-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The driving force behind oncoproteomics is to identify protein signatures that are associated with a particular malignancy. Here, we have used a recombinant scFv antibody microarray in an attempt to classify sera derived from pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients versus healthy subjects. Based on analysis of nonfractionated, directly labeled, whole human serum proteomes we have identified a protein signature based on 19 nonredundant analytes, that discriminates between cancer patients and healthy subjects. Furthermore, a potential protein signature, consisting of 21 protein analytes, could be defined that was shown to be associated with cancer patients having a life expectancy of <12 months. Taken together, the data suggest that antibody microarray analysis of complex proteomes will be a useful tool to define disease associated protein signatures.
Proteomics 06/2008; 8(11):2211-9. · 4.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The driving force behind oncoproteomics is to identify protein signatures that are associated with a particular malignancy. Here, we have used a recombinant scFv antibody microarray in an attempt to classify sera derived from pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients versus healthy subjects. Based on analysis of nonfractionated, directly labeled, whole human serum proteomes we have identified a protein signature based on 19 nonredundant analytes, that discriminates between cancer patients and healthy subjects. Furthermore, a potential protein signature, consisting of 21 protein analytes, could be defined that was shown to be associated with cancer patients having a life expectancy of <12 months. Taken together, the data suggest that antibody microarray analysis of complex proteomes will be a useful tool to define disease associated protein signatures.
Proteomics 05/2008; 8(11):2211 - 2219. · 4.43 Impact Factor
-
Erik Rollman,
Nathalie Mathy,
Andreas Bråve,
Andreas Boberg,
Anne Kjerrström,
Cathy van Wely, Gunnel Engström,
Susanne Johansson,
Kajsa Aperia,
Lars E Eriksson,
Reinhold Benthin,
Peter Ertl,
Jonathan Heeney,
Jorma Hinkula,
Gerald Voss,
Britta Wahren
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A DNA plasmid encoding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) env, nef and tat genes was used in mice in a prime-boost immunization regimen with the corresponding recombinant proteins. The genetic immunogen was delivered with a gene gun and the proteins were injected intramuscularly together with the adjuvant AS02A. Immunizations were followed by experimental challenge with pseudotyped HIV-1 subtype A or B virus. In an initial experiment in which animals were challenged four weeks after the final immunization, all single modality and prime-boost vaccinations resulted in a significant level of protection as compared to control animals. There was a trend for DNA-alone immunization yielding the highest protection. In a subsequent study, a late challenge was performed 19 weeks after the final immunization. All groups having received the DNA vaccine, either alone or in combination with adjuvanted protein, exhibited strong protection against HIV replication. The subtype-specific protection against the experimental HIV challenge was significantly stronger than the cross-protection. Cellular and humoral immune responses were assessed during immunization and after challenge, but without clear correlation to protection against HIV replication. The data suggest that either DNA or protein antigens alone provide partial protection against an HIV-1/MuLV challenge and that DNA immunization is essential for achieving very high levels of efficacy in this murine HIV-1 challenge model. While prime-boost combinations were more immunogenic than DNA alone, they did not appear to provide any further enhancement over DNA vaccine mediated efficacy. The DNA immunogen might prime low levels of CD8+ T cells responsible for virus clearance or possibly a yet unidentified mechanism of protection.
Vaccine 04/2007; 25(11):2145-54. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
Andreas Bråve,
Lindvi Gudmundsdotter,
Georg Gasteiger,
Kristian Hallermalm,
Wolfgang Kastenmuller,
Erik Rollman,
Andreas Boberg, Gunnel Engström,
Sven Reiland,
Antonio Cosma,
Ingo Drexler,
Jorma Hinkula,
Britta Wahren,
Volker Erfle
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) regulatory protein, Nef, is an attractive vaccine target because it is involved in viral pathogenesis, is expressed early in the viral life cycle and harbors many T and B cell epitopes. Several clinical trials include gene-based vaccines encoding this protein. However, Nef has been shown to transform certain cell types in vitro. Based on these findings we performed a long-term toxicity and immunogenicity study of Nef, encoded either by Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara or by plasmid DNA. BALB/c mice were primed twice with either DNA or MVA encoding Nef and received a homologous or heterologous boost ten months later. In the meantime, the Nef-specific immune responses were monitored and at the time of sacrifice an extensive toxicological evaluation was performed, where presence of tumors and other pathological changes were assessed.
The toxicological evaluation showed that immunization with MVAnef is safe and does not cause cellular transformation or other toxicity in somatic organs.Both DNAnef and MVAnef immunized animals developed potent Nef-specific cellular responses that declined to undetectable levels over time, and could readily be boosted after almost one year. This is of particular interest since it shows that plasmid DNA vaccine can also be used as a potent late booster of primed immune responses. We observed qualitative differences between the T cell responses induced by the two different vectors: DNA-encoded nef induced long-lasting CD8+ T cell memory responses, whereas MVA-encoded nef induced CD4+ T cell memory responses. In terms of the humoral immune responses, we show that two injections of MVAnef induce significant anti-Nef titers, while repeated injections of DNAnef do not. A single boost with MVAnef could enhance the antibody response following DNAnef prime to the same level as that observed in animals immunized repeatedly with MVAnef. We also demonstrate the possibility to boost HIV-1 Nef-specific immune responses using the MVAnef construct despite the presence of potent anti-vector immunity.
This study shows that the nef gene vectored by MVA does not induce malignancies or other adverse effects in mice. Further, we show that when the nef gene is delivered by plasmid or by a viral vector, it elicits potent and long-lasting immune responses and that these responses can be directed towards a CD4+ or a CD8+ T cell response depending on the choice of vector.
Infectious Agents and Cancer 02/2007; 2:14.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We investigated the effects of immunizing with several genes and subtypes of HIV-1. The genes used as immunogens were: gp160 envelope (env subtypes A, B and C), p37gag (gag subtypes A and B), rev (subtype B) and reverse transcriptase (RT subtype B). The different genes are all carried by separate plasmids. C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were immunized with different combinations of the genes together with recombinant cytokine granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor. The env genes injected alone induced significantly stronger cellular responses to envelope in both strains of mice than when env genes were injected together with gag and RT genes. In the C57BL/6 mice, the envelope specific responses were significantly increased after spatial separation of env genes from gag and RT genes as compared to when all vaccine genes were injected as a mixture. The gag responses were strong in gag-immunized animals and were not significantly affected by the spatial separation of gag and RT genes from the env genes. Our results illustrate the importance of being cautious when formulating multivalent genetic vaccines and that it might be possible to overcome lost immune responses through spatial separation of vaccine antigens.
Vaccine 06/2006; 24(21):4524-6. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were immunized with two different plasmids (p91023B and pKCEA66) encoding different forms of the tumor-associated antigen carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The wild type form of CEA (p91023B), which is expressed at the cell surface, induces stronger anti-CEA IgG response after DNA-plasmid immunizations than the modified intracellular form of CEA (pKCEA66), which was designed to mount strong cellular responses. Boosting with recombinant CEA (rCEA) increased the anti-CEA IgG response significantly. In the tumor protection model used, where SCID mice are challenged with human tumor cells mixed with splenocytes from immunized mice, both innate and specific immune responses are responsible for the protective effect.
Vaccine 06/2006; 24(21):4572-5. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
Anne Kjerrström Zuber,
Andreas Bråve, Gunnel Engström,
Bartek Zuber,
Karl Ljungberg,
Malin Fredriksson,
Reinhold Benthin,
Maria G Isaguliants,
Eric Sandström,
Jorma Hinkula,
Britta Wahren
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We evaluated the compound imiquimod as a possible adjuvant for DNA immunization against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We found that gene-gun epidermal delivery of the DNA in combination with imiquimod resulted in the strongest HIV specific immune responses. The effect of imiquimod was further compared to that of recombinant granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a known DNA vaccine adjuvant. Both adjuvants were able to enhance the immune responses induced by the HIV-1 genes alone. The delivery of an adjuvant as a topical cream rather than through injections has a clear clinical benefit. We show for the first time that imiquimod can act as an adjuvant for DNA vaccination.
Vaccine 05/2004; 22(13-14):1791-8. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, CEACAM5) is expressed on several human carcinomas including colon cancer. CEA contains signal peptides that target the protein through the endoplasmic reticulum and to the cell membrane. We constructed a plasmid DNA vaccine encoding a truncated CEA (deltaCEA), devoid of its signal peptides, and demonstrated that it was retained inside the cell, while full-length CEA (wtCEA) was expressed on the membrane. We hypothesized that intracellular retention of deltaCEA would enhance MHC class I presentation of CEA peptides, thus favoring cellular immune responses. In addition, a promiscuous T-helper epitope (Q830-L844 of tetanus toxoid) was fused to the N-terminal of the truncated CEA gene (tetdeltaCEA). C57BL/6 mice immunized with DNA encoding wtCEA or tetdeltaCEA developed both humoral and cellular immune responses to CEA. SCID mice transplanted with spleen cells from tetdeltaCEA but not wtCEA-immunized C57BL/6 mice showed strong suppression of tumor growth after inoculation of human CEA-expressing colon carcinoma cells. Immune spleen cell populations depleted for either B, T or both B and T cells were active, indicating that effector cells might also reside in other populations. The present approach to manipulating antigen presentation may open new possibilities for immunotherapy against colon and other CEA-secreting carcinomas.
Cancer Gene Therapy 06/2003; 10(5):365-76. · 2.80 Impact Factor
