Nagi S El Saghir

American University of Beirut, Beirut, Mohafazat Beyrouth, Lebanon

Are you Nagi S El Saghir?

Claim your profile

Publications (32)94.69 Total impact

  • Article: Breast cancer early detection and resources: where in the world do we start?
    Nagi S El Saghir, Benjamin O Anderson
    Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 07/2012; 21(4):423-5. · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • Article: Optimisation of breast cancer management in low-resource and middle-resource countries: executive summary of the Breast Health Global Initiative consensus, 2010.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) 2010 summit was to provide a consensus analysis of breast cancer control issues and implementation strategies for low-income and middle-income countries (LMCs), where advanced stages at presentation and poor diagnostic and treatment capacities contribute to lower breast cancer survival rates than in high-income countries. Health system and patient-related barriers were identified that create common clinical scenarios in which women do not present for diagnosis until their cancer has progressed to locally advanced or metastatic stages. As countries progress to higher economic status, the rate of late presentation is expected to decrease, and diagnostic and treatment resources are expected to improve. Health-care systems in LMCs share many challenges including national or regional data collection, programme infrastructure and capacity (including appropriate equipment and drug acquisitions, and professional training and accreditation), the need for qualitative and quantitative research to support decision making, and strategies to improve patient access and compliance as well as public, health-care professional, and policy-maker awareness that breast cancer is a cost-effective, treatable disease. The biggest challenges identified for low-income countries were little community awareness that breast cancer is treatable, inadequate advanced pathology services for diagnosis and staging, and fragmented treatment options, especially for the administration of radiotherapy and the full range of systemic treatments. The biggest challenges identified for middle-resource countries were the establishment and maintenance of data registries, the coordination of multidisciplinary centres of excellence with broad outreach programmes to provide community access to cancer diagnosis and treatment, and the resource-appropriate prioritisation of breast cancer control programmes within the framework of existing, functional health-care systems.
    The lancet oncology 04/2011; 12(4):387-98. · 14.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Breast cancer management in low resource countries (LRCs): consensus statement from the Breast Health Global Initiative.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) brought together international breast cancer experts to discuss breast cancer in low resource countries (LRCs) and identify common concerns reviewed in this consensus statement. There continues to be a lack of public and health care professionals' awareness of the importance of early detection of breast cancer. Mastectomy continues to be the most common treatment for breast cancer; and a lack of surgeons and anesthesia services was identified as a contributing factor in delayed surgical therapy in LRCs. Where available, radiation therapy is still more likely to be used for palliation rather than for curative treatment. Tumor receptor status is often suboptimally performed due to lack of advanced pathology services and variable quality control of tissue handling and processing. Regional pathology services can be a cost-effective approach and can serve as reference, training and research centers. Limited availability of medical oncologists in LRCs often results in non-specialist providing chemotherapeutic services, which requires additional supervision and training. Palliative care is an emerging field in LRCs that requires investment in training and infrastructure development. A commitment and investment in the development of breast cancer care services by LRC governments and health authorities remains a critical need in LRCs.
    Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 03/2011; 20 Suppl 2:S3-11. · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • Article: Treatment of metastatic breast cancer: state-of-the-art, subtypes and perspectives.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) aims at achieving meaningful clinical responses, improved quality of life, long-term remissions, prolonged survival, and dares to hope for a cure in a small percentage of cases. This article will discuss both consensus and controversies in the management of MBC in the context of the new evolving breast cancer molecular classification. Hormonal therapy remains the mainstay of management of MBC Luminal A and B. Data is emerging on management of ErbB2-positive HR-positive MBC by combining hormonal manipulation and targeted anti-ErbB2 therapy and has recently received regulatory approval in Europe and USA. The optimal use and duration of single agent or combination chemotherapy is discussed. Data and controversies surrounding the use of newer agents such as nab-paclitaxel, ixabepilone, eribulin, and PARP inhibitors as well as trastuzumab is reviewed. Better understanding of pathophysiology has paved the way for the introduction of newer anti-ErbB2 agents such as lapatinib, pertuzumab, T-DM1 and neratinib. Controversies regarding bevacizumab and anti-angiogenesis are discussed. Bisphosphonates have significantly reduced skeletal related events and made significant improvements in the quality of life of patients with MBC. Newer anti-RANK Ligand antibodies show promising results. Significant advances in the understanding of molecular biology of breast cancer have been made and should lead to an improvement in the outcome of MBC. More possibilities of cure can become an attainable goal in the near future.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 02/2011; 80(3):433-49. · 5.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Survey of utilization of multidisciplinary management tumor boards in Arab countries.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multidisciplinary management (MDM) of cancer patients provides better care and is recommended by all authorities and published guidelines. There is very little documentation of MDM practices in low and middle income countries. A survey of 338 practicing oncology specialists from various Arab countries was conducted at four major pan-Arab oncology conferences in the first half of 2010. While 72% of respondents reported having an MDM tumor board, only 49% reported that their tumor boards met on a weekly basis. Of those who do not have a tumor board, 57% attend a tumor board meeting at another hospital within their country. 60% of respondents attend tumor board meetings to seek group opinion and help in the management of their patients. 93% of physicians surveyed agreed that tumor boards should be mandatory. The vast majority of physicians agreed that in the absence of all specialties, "mini tumor boards" should be organized between available specialists at all hospitals that treat cancer patients.
    Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 02/2011; 20 Suppl 2:S70-4. · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • Article: Isolated splenic metastasis from colorectal cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Splenic metastases are unusual, arising in less than 1% of all metastases. Isolated solitary splenic metastasis from colorectal carcinoma is considered exceptional. This rarity has been explained by several hypotheses relating to the anatomical, histological, and immunological features of the spleen. We review the reported cases of isolated solitary splenic metastasis from colorectal carcinoma and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic options for this entity. We searched the English-language medical literature, using the Medline and Pubmed databases from January 1966 through July 2010, for articles reporting isolated splenic metastasis from colorectal carcinoma. Only 26 cases have been reported; four cases had synchronous splenic metastasis. Fifteen patients had regional lymph node involvement on diagnosis of primary carcinoma. The primary tumor was located in the left colon or in the rectum in 18 cases. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was elevated in 73% of cases. All patients underwent curative splenectomy; only one patient had laparoscopic resection of the spleen. Mean reported survival interval was 19.5 months; only three patients were deceased at last follow-up. Solitary splenic metastasis from colorectal carcinoma is very rare; clinicians are advised to pay close attention when routinely evaluating patients with serial CEA levels and abdominal scans. Splenectomy seems to be the preferred treatment modality with improvement of long-term survival. However, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from the small number of case reports available.
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology 01/2011; 16(4):306-13. · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • Article: Ratio between positive lymph nodes and total excised axillary lymph nodes as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic lymph node-positive breast cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND.: The status of the axillary lymph nodes in nonmetastatic lymph node-positive breast cancer (BC) patients remains the single most important determinant of overall survival (OS). Although the absolute number of nodes involved with cancer is important for prognosis, the role of the total number of excised nodes has received less emphasis. Thus, several studies have focused on the utility of the axillary lymph node ratio (ALNR) as an independent prognostic indicator of OS. However, most studies suffered from shortcomings, such as including patients who received neoadjuvant therapy or failing to consider the use of adjuvant therapy and tumor receptor status in their analysis. METHODS.: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 669 patients with nonmetastatic lymph nodepositive BC. Data collected included patient demographics; breast cancer risk factors; tumor size, histopathological, receptor, and lymph node status; and treatment modalities used. Patients were subdivided into four groups according to ALNR value (<.25, .25-.49, .50-.74, .75-1.00). Study parameters were compared at the univariate and multivariate levels for their effect on OS. RESULTS.: On univariate analysis, both the absolute number of positive lymph nodes and the ALNR were significant predictors of OS. On multivariate analysis, only the ALNR remained an independent predictor of OS, with a 2.5-fold increased risk of dying at an ALNR of ≥.25. CONCLUSIONS.: Our study demonstrates that ALNR is a stronger factor in predicting OS than the absolute number of positive axillary lymph nodes.
    Indian journal of surgical oncology. 12/2010; 1(4):305-12.
  • Article: Complete response of brain metastases from breast cancer overexpressing Her-2/neu to radiation and concurrent Lapatinib and Capecitabine.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancers that overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) have a predilection to metastasize to the brain. Therapeutic options for brain metastases with systemic therapy remain a challenge in those patients since targeted and chemotherapeutic agents have limited penetration through the blood-brain barrier. Here we report the case of a patient with brain metastases from breast cancer overexpressing HER-2 who achieved a complete radiologic response after treatment by radiation and concurrent Lapatinib and Capecitabine.
    The Breast Journal 11/2010; 16(6):644-6. · 1.64 Impact Factor
  • Article: Ratio between positive lymph nodes and total excised axillary lymph nodes as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic lymph node-positive breast cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The status of the axillary lymph nodes in nonmetastatic lymph node-positive breast cancer (BC) patients remains the single most important determinant of overall survival (OS). Although the absolute number of nodes involved with cancer is important for prognosis, the role of the total number of excised nodes has received less emphasis. Thus, several studies have focused on the utility of the axillary lymph node ratio (ALNR) as an independent prognostic indicator of OS. However, most studies suffered from shortcomings, such as including patients who received neoadjuvant therapy or failing to consider the use of adjuvant therapy and tumor receptor status in their analysis. We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 669 patients with nonmetastatic lymph nodepositive BC. Data collected included patient demographics; breast cancer risk factors; tumor size, histopathological, receptor, and lymph node status; and treatment modalities used. Patients were subdivided into four groups according to ALNR value (<0.25, 0.25-0.49, 0.50-0.74, 0.75-1.00). Study parameters were compared at the univariate and multivariate levels for their effect on OS. On univariate analysis, both the absolute number of positive lymph nodes and the ALNR were significant predictors of OS. On multivariate analysis, only the ALNR remained an independent predictor of OS, with a 2.5-fold increased risk of dying at an ALNR of ⩾0.25. Our study demonstrates that ALNR is a stronger factor in predicting OS than the absolute number of positive axillary lymph nodes.
    Indian journal of surgical oncology. 01/2010; 1(1):68-75.
  • Source
    Article: Axillary lymph node ratio revisited.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 08/2009; 27(24):e67; author reply e68-9. · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Long-term outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Lebanon: a single institution experience from the American University of Beirut.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The most important studies about outcome of acute leukemia come from developed countries, whereas most of the patients with this disease are in developing countries. We report predictive and prognostic factors in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a tertiary care center in a developing country. We retrospectively reviewed the records of adult patients with acute leukemia who were referred to the American University of Beirut Medical Center between 1996 and early 2006. Of 105 patients, 36 (34%) patients were diagnosed with ALL, and included 19 (53%) males and 17 (47%) females with a median age of 34 years (range, 14-79 years). Induction chemotherapy with curative intent was administered to 34 (94%) patients. Twenty-seven patients received intrathecal chemotherapy as prophylaxis (n=24) or as treatment for CNS disease (n=3). Twenty-eight patients (82%) achieved complete remission (CR) after induction chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) time was 22 months and the five-year OS for ALL patients was 38%. The median disease-free survival (DFS) time was 12 months, while the five-year DFS was 38%. Multivariate analysis showed that age <40 years, WBC <30 X 109/L, achievement of CR after first induction, and CNS prophylaxis were predictive factors for OS and DFS. Despite limitations and the relatively low socioeconomic status of the Lebanese population, OS (38%) and DFS (38%) are quite similar to international data. Trends toward a higher CR and DFS in adults are due to intensified consolidation chemotherapy, the use of stem cell transplantation, and improvements in supportive care.
    Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy 01/2009; 2(2):333-9.
  • Source
    Article: Responding to the challenges of breast cancer in egypt and other arab countries.
    Nagi S El Saghir
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Physicians in Egypt and other Arab and developing countries still have to deal on a daily basis with large numbers of patients with advanced stages of breast cancer at presentation. Efforts at measuring the magnitude of the breast cancer issues, epidemiology, and awareness, are now moving further in the right direction. We are now starting to face the challenges of early detection of breast cancer as well as the implementation of proper modern management. Dorria S. Salem et al. publish in this issue of the Journal of Egyptian NCI an outline and initial results of a very ambitious Women Health Outreach Program (WHOP) designed to be completed in 5 phases 1. She and her co-authors state that those 5 phases include a prior training and demonstration phase that was completed in the Imaging Unit of Kasr El Aini Hospital in Cairo, as well as a one-year pilot phase completed between October 2007 and October 2008. Authors present us with results of screening of 20.098 women over the age of 45 years, between October 30, 2007 and February 9, 2009 in Cairo, Alexandria and Suez Governorates in Egypt. In addition to breast cancer, WHOP included screening for diabetes, hypertension and obesity. WHOP investigators are to be congratulated for this extraordinary ambitious project and all the efforts put into it. They were well prepared in regards to having a multi-disciplinary working team and they included in their project programs for training of clerks, data managers, radiographers, nurses, radiologists and other physicians who deal with diagnosis and management of breast cancer. They also included engineers and arranged for mobile units to reach women who could not otherwise reach them. WHOP investigators are to be commended also for performing a field plan demonstration project and testing it and for measuring citizens' response before finalizing their plans and starting the project1. They set a great example for other people working in the field. Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy in women in almost all Arab countries [2-5]. Randomized trials of mammographic screening of average-risk women above 50 years reduced breast cancer mortality by more than 36%. Analysis of the eight randomized trials, including the Canadian trials on women, ages 40-49 years old, showed a relative reduction of breast cancer deaths by 18% [6]. There is an obvious overlap as women with ages ranging from 40-49 years old reach the age of 50 and above, and enjoy the more clear benefits of mammographic screening beyond the age of 50 years. Many societies, including the American Cancer Society, recommend mammographic screening starting at age 40 years [7,8]. As it would be very difficult in this day and age to do more studies on breast cancer screening, and in view of the observations that almost 50% of cases are below the age of 50 years with a median age of 48-52 years at presentation, we recommend screening be done starting age 40, where resources are available and where setup for breast cancer care is appropriate [4,9]. Salem et al. report an initial very significant and alarming number of 10.215 women out of 20.098 women to be overweight and 2692 women to be obese [1]. Their observation that there is no significant correlation with breast cancer is only a one point in time observation and it cannot be used to confirm or refute any potential relationship between overweight, obesity and breast cancer. Future results, follow-up, and multivariate analysis will be awaited. Correlation of mammographic abnormalities with diabetes and hypertension in WHOP participants are very preliminary and will also need further multivariate analysis. WHOP investigators report that they invited women aged 45 years and up for screening. Eligibility criteria listed include only two points, women should have no personal history of breast cancer and no recent mammography [1], authors neither describe clinical history nor physical breast examination of selected and invited women. In future reports, authors will be asked about the assessement of those invited women, and what were the results and outcome if referred women were found to have abnormalities in their breasts. In another study from Cairo, Egypt, women were taught how to examine themselves, and authors reported that many were found to have clinical breast cancers for which they were effectively downstaged, and therefore treated for cancers that would have otherwise presented later as more advanced cases [10]. This issue brings me back to re-emphasize the importance of awareness, teaching women self-breast exam, and clinical breast examination once-a-year by a physician, particularly in countries with limited resources. Breast cancer awareness campaigns emphasize the benefits of early detection by promoting breaking of taboos, and teaching scientific facts that early breast cancer can be cured, and that cure can be achieved without the need of mastectomy. Advanced breast cancer is devastating to women and to their husbands and children, and therefore campaigns should be directed towards women as well as husbands who should be asked to encourage their wives to enroll in screening campaigns. Campaigns have begun to reduce the effects of taboos and people started to talk more freely about cancer, in fact, we and many centers in Arab countries have started to see more cases of early breast cancer and even a significant number of cases with microcalcifications [4]. Breast cancer screening in countries with limited resources have been recently reviewed [11,12]. As for the management of abnormal findings, Dorria S. Salem et al. [1] report performing FNAB as first line management in suspicious cases and reserving core biopsies for inconclusive cases. I fully agree with the authors' efforts to ensure accurate diagnosis and the importance of having an experienced cytopathologist. However, FNA is useful and recommended when there is a palpable tumor or a highly suspicious tumor with irregular borders and infiltrative characteristics on mammography and ultrasound. Core biopsy is indicated when FNA is inconclusive as the authors state, and also if mammography shows micro-calcifications where FNA cannot distinguish between in-situ and infiltrative carcinoma. A core biopsy is important for better assessment of pathology and determination of receptors (estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors) especially in patients with large tumors who require preoperative (neoadjuvant) therapy, particularly when targeted anti-HER2 therapy is indicated [13]. In the present report, WHOP investigators [1] report that 31 patients, out of 86 true positive cancers, underwent modified radical mastectomy while 21 had breast-conserving surgery. Eleven patients required only excisional biopsy and had benign tumors, 25 had surgery at private institutions and no data is available on them. Further WHOP reports will be awaited to report to us on the stages and follow-up information on all patients. Availability of experienced surgeons and radiation oncology are also important issues when referring patients for partial or total mastectomy. After screening of over 20000 women, authors report that abnormal mammographies with BiRADS 4 and 5 were found in 433 cases (reported as 2.1%). Additional work-up with ultrasound and FNA/biopsy showed 2 false negatives, 110 false positives, and confirmed 86 true positive cases (0.4% of total 20.098 women screened). In the US, the likelihood of a woman being called back for additional testing after first round of screening is an average of 11% (range 3-57%) [14]. In women for whom a biopsy is then indicated, the likelihood of finding an invasive and/or insitu cancer is 25-47% [15]. This is what we call positive predictive value (PPV) and it varies with expertise and patients own risk factors for breast cancer. What is of concern in this present WHOP article, although not unexpected, is that more than half of the recalled women did not show up or no feedback is available on them. This should generate yet another important experience on how to deal with missing information and how to assure follow-up of patients in Egypt and other Arab countries, as well as in all limited resource countries. WHOP investigators will be asked to report in the future on screening intervals and data collection. Screening started at age 45 years, and data were analyzed by 10-year age groups starting age 50, which makes comparisons somehow difficult. In view of the high incidence of women with breast cancer with young age at presentation, it would be more helpful if WHOP investigators revise the starting age for screening mammography and make it 40 years and analyze data according to 10-year age groups starting age 40 years. On the other hand, it is important to note that increasing the time interval of periodic mammography diminished the mortality reduction by allowing undetected growth of interval cancers. Increasing the screening interval of women in their forties from annual to every 2 years or to every 3 years would diminish mortality reduction rates from 36% to 18% and to 4%, respectively [16]. Once a screening strategy is adopted, women aged 40 years and up should be screened at yearly intervals because data from Egypt and other Arab countries indicate that 50% of breast cancers are seen in women below age 50 years, and because young women have more aggressive tumors [17,18] and may be missed by two-year intervals. Finally, WHOP investigators, staff, and their sponsors are to be commended for this excellent, well planned and executed project that sets a great example for devotion for science and public health. In addition to regional and national cancer registries, they provide many new innovative approaches to characterize, diagnose and treat breast cancer in Egypt and other Arab countries. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
    Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute 12/2008; 20(4):309-12.
  • Article: Modified resistance to chemotherapy and trastuzumab by bevacizumab in locally recurrent breast cancer.
    Mirna H Farhat, Nagi S El-Saghir, Ali I Shamseddine
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antiangiogenic therapy is a valuable new approach in the treatment of breast cancer. Response rates ranging from 6.7% to 54% were reported using Bevacizumab (Avastin), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, with chemotherapy. We report the first case of a patient, with a highly vascular breast cancer that recurred locally while on treatment with paclitaxel and trastuzumab combination, but showed complete clinical and pathological regression upon the addition of bevacizumab therapy to the same combination.
    Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 12/2008; 18(1):66-8. · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • Article: Locally advanced breast cancer: treatment guideline implementation with particular attention to low- and middle-income countries.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is guided by scientific advances but is limited by local resources and expertise. LABC remains very common in low-resource countries. The Systemic Therapy Focus Group met as part of the Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) Summit in Budapest, Hungary, in October 2007 to discuss management and implementation of primary systemic therapy (PST) for LABC. PST is standard treatment for large operable breast cancer in enhanced-resource settings and, in all resource settings, should be standard treatment for inoperable breast cancer and for LABC. Standard PST includes anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The addition of sequential taxanes after anthracycline improves pathologic responses and breast-conservation rates and is appropriate at enhanced-resource levels; however, costs and lack of clear survival benefit do not justify their use at limited-resource levels. It remains to define better the role of endocrine therapy as PST, but it is acceptable in elderly women. Aromatase inhibitors have produced better results than tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients and are used in enhanced-resource settings. The less expensive tamoxifen remains useful in low-resource countries. Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy yields high pathologic response rates in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors; its use in low-resource countries is limited by high costs. Most studies on PST of LABC were conducted in countries with enhanced resources. BHGI encourages conducting clinical trials in countries with limited resources.
    Cancer 11/2008; 113(8 Suppl):2315-24. · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: treatment resource allocation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A key determinant of breast cancer outcome is the degree to which newly diagnosed cancers are treated correctly in a timely fashion. Available resources must be applied in a rational manner to optimize population-based outcomes. A multidisciplinary international panel of experts addressed the implementation of treatment guidelines and developed process checklists for breast surgery, radiation treatment, and systemic therapy. The needed resources for stage I, stage II, locally advanced, and metastatic breast cancer were outlined, and process metrics were developed. The ability to perform modified radical mastectomy is the mainstay of locoregional treatment at the basic level of breast healthcare. Radiation therapy allows for consideration of breast-conserving therapy, postmastectomy chest wall irradiation, and palliation of painful or symptomatic metastases. Systemic therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of all biologic subtypes of breast cancer, but its provision is resource intensive. Although endocrine therapy requires few specialized resources, it requires knowledge of hormone receptor status. Targeted therapy against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (anti-HER-2) is very effective in tumors that overexpress HER-2/neu receptors, but cost largely prevents its use in resource-limited environments. Incremental allocation of resources can help address economic disparities and ensure equity in access to care. Checklists and allocation tables can support the objective of offering optimal care for all patients. The use of process metrics can facilitate the development of multidisciplinary, integrated, fiscally responsible, continuously improving, and flexible approaches to the global enhancement of breast cancer treatment.
    Cancer 11/2008; 113(8 Suppl):2269-81. · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Article: Trends in epidemiology and management of breast cancer in developing Arab countries: a literature and registry analysis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Registries and research on breast cancer in Arabic and developing countries are limited. We searched PubMed, Medline, WHO and IAEA publications, national, regional, hospital tumor registries and abstracts. We reviewed and analyzed available data on epidemiological trends and management of breast cancer in Arab countries, and compared it to current international standards of early detection, surgery and radiation therapy. Breast cancer constitutes 13-35% of all female cancers. Almost half of patients are below 50 and median age is 49-52 years as compared to 63 in industrialized nations. A recent rise of Age-Standardized Incidence Rates (ASR) is noted. Advanced disease remains very common in Egypt, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Palestinians and others. Mastectomy is still performed in more than 80% of women with breast cancer. There are only 84 radiation therapy centers, 256 radiation oncologists and 473 radiation technologists in all Arab countries, as compared with 1875, 3068 and 5155, respectively, in the USA, which has an equivalent population of about 300 million. Population-based screening is rarely practiced. Results from recent campaigns and studies show a positive impact of clinical breast examination leading to more early diagnosis and breast-conserving surgery. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in Arab countries with a young age of around 50 years at presentation. Locally advanced disease is very common and total mastectomy is the most commonly performed surgery. Awareness campaigns and value of clinical breast examination were validated in the Cairo Breast Cancer Screening Trial. More radiation centers and early detection would optimize care and reduce the currently high rate of total mastectomies. Population-based screening in those countries with affluent resources and accessible care should be implemented.
    International journal of surgery (London, England) 09/2007; 5(4):225-33.
  • Article: The value of EUS in predicting the response of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma to Helicobacter pylori eradication.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is associated with Helicobacter pylori infection, and regression of the tumor has been described after its eradication. To determine the value of EUS, in addition to other clinical/endoscopic features, in predicting the response of low-grade MALT lymphoma to H pylori eradication. A retrospective, single-center study. Twenty-two patients with primary gastric MALT lymphoma were identified through a retrospective review of charts of patients seen at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Only 19 patients with histopathologically confirmed gastric MALT lymphoma and H pylori infection who had EUS staging were included in the study. Regression of the gastric MALT lymphoma as determined by follow-up endoscopy and mucosal biopsies. Patients with disease restricted to the gastric mucosa had a significantly higher rate of complete remission after H pylori eradication compared with patients who had disease infiltrating into the gastric submucosa (77.8% vs 12.5%, P value .007). There was no statistical difference in terms of the mean follow-up time to achieve such response (P value .212). Age, sex, location of the tumor within the stomach, and endoscopic appearance did not correlate with the probability of complete remission of the MALT lymphoma. The limitations include a retrospective design and a relatively small sample population. EUS determination of the invasion depth of gastric MALT lymphoma helps predict a complete response to H pylori eradication.
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 02/2007; 65(1):89-96. · 4.88 Impact Factor
  • Article: Combined ovarian ablation and aromatase inhibition as first-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women: report of three cases.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aromatase inhibitors have become well established for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer and for adjuvant hormonal therapy for primary breast cancer. Benefit of aromatase inhibition has not yet been extended to premenopausal women. Ovarian ablation by oophorectomy, ovarian radiation or hormonal suppression is the initial recommended treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women. The addition of tamoxifen improves the benefit of ovarian ablation/ovarian suppression. Addition of aromatase inhibitors to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs has been reported to significantly decrease circulating estrogens and produce tumor responses in only a very small number of patients over the last 15 years. We treated three premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer with combined oophorectomy or ovarian irradiation and anastrozole. One patient remained free of progression for 4 years, while the other two remained free of progression for more than 5 and 3 years, respectively. We also note that monthly zoledronic acid for 4 years produced sclerosis of vertebral body metastasis. We conclude that combined ovarian ablation and aromatase inhibition is a feasible treatment modality that deserves more attention and further investigation for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women.
    Anti-Cancer Drugs 10/2006; 17(8):999-1002. · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • Article: Angiogenesis and cancer: A cross-talk between basic science and clinical trials (the "do ut des" paradigm).
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in facilitating tumor growth and the metastatic process, and it is the result of a dynamic balance between pro-angiogenic factors, like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor, and antiangiogenic factors, like thrombospondin-1 and angiostatin. Many drugs that target human tumors, like bevacizumab and some VEGF-receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (e.g., BAY 43-9006, SU11248 and PTK787/ZK222584) have been studied in clinical trials, with favorable toxicity reports and encouraging results in advanced colorectal cancer, renal cell cancer, breast cancer and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, either combined with chemotherapy, or in monotherapy. Another potential approach to inhibiting angiogenesis is through metronomic chemotherapy (low doses of chemotherapy for long periods of time). This review describes the mechanisms of the angiogenic process and evaluates the recent data about antiangiogenic therapies in clinical trials.
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 08/2006; 59(1):40-50. · 4.41 Impact Factor
  • Article: A clinical phase II study of a non-anthracycline sequential combination of cisplatin-vinorelbine followed by docetaxel as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We tested a sequential combination regimen using cisplatin and vinorelbine (PVn) followed by docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in a phase II clinical trial in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) was given on day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Responding patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days for a maximum of 4 cycles. Three patients were excluded from analysis because of death unrelated to treatment. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 32 patients completed the study. The overall response rate was 53.1%. Complete remission was seen in 5 patients (15.6%), partial response in 12 (37.5%), stable disease in 6 (18.75%), and progressive disease in 9 patients (28.1%). Median time to disease progression was 8 months (range 1-24). At 24 months, 12 (37.5%) patients were alive. A total of 183 cycles were administered. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 4 patients (2.2%). Grade II nephrotoxicity occurred in 12 cycles (6.5%) and grade III vomiting in 31/183 cycles (16.9%). PVn is a feasible non-anthracycline option as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and has acceptable toxicity. The sequential addition of 4 cycles of docetaxel following 4 cycles of PVn did not improve the overall response rate and results.
    Oncology 02/2006; 70(5):330-8. · 2.27 Impact Factor