-
Diana M Cittelly,
Irina Dimitrova,
Erin N Howe,
Dawn R Cochrane, Annie Jean,
Nicole S Spoelstra,
Miriam D Post,
Xian Lu,
Russell R Broaddus,
Monique A Spillman,
Jennifer K Richer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A therapeutic intervention that could decrease tumor burden and increase sensitivity to chemotherapy would have a significant impact on the high morbidity rate associated with ovarian cancer. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as potential therapeutic candidates due to their ability to down regulate multiple targets involved in tumor progression and chemoresistance. MiR-200c is down regulated in ovarian cancer cell lines and stage III ovarian tumors, and low miR-200c correlates with poor prognosis. MiR-200c increases sensitivity to taxanes in vitro, by targeting TUBB3, a tubulin known to mediate chemoresistance. Indeed, we find that patients with tumors with low TUBB3 had significantly prolonged survival (average survival 52.73 ± 4.08 months) compared to those with high TUBB3 (average survival 42.56 ±3.19 months). MiR-200c also targets TrkB, a mediator of resistance to anoikis. We demonstrate that restoration of miR-200c to ovarian cancer cells results in increased anoikis sensitivity and reduced adherence to biological substrates in vitro. Since both chemo- and anoikis-resistance are critical steps in the progression of ovarian cancer, we sought to determine how restoration of miR-200c affects tumor burden and chemosensitivity in an in vivo preclinical model of ovarian cancer. Restoration of miR-200c in an intraperitoneal xenograft model of human ovarian cancer, results in decreased tumor formation and tumor burden. Furthermore, even in established tumors, restoration of miR-200c, alone or in combination with paclitaxel, results in significantly decreased tumor burden. Our study suggests that restoration of miR-200c immediately prior to cytotoxic chemotherapy may allow for a better response or lower effective dose.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 10/2012; · 5.23 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Pit-1 is a POU-homeodomain transcription factor that dictates the ontogeny of pituitary somatotrophs, lactotrophs, and thyrotrophs through regulation of their respective protein hormone genes: GH, prolactin (PRL), and TSHbeta. Although Pit-1 threonine 220 (T220) and serine 115 are protein kinase phospho-acceptor sites, the transcriptional role of Pit-1 phosphorylation remains unclear. In the rat PRL promoter (rPRL), Ras-stimulated transcription is mediated by binding of Ets-1 and Pit-1 at a composite site (FPIV). Ets-1 and Pit-1 physically interact, and Pit-1 T220 is a major Ets-1 contact point. T220 was mutated to aspartic acid (D, to mimic phosphorylation) or a neutral alanine (A), and DNA binding and transcriptional activity were tested. The Pit-1 T220D mutation reduced binding at monomeric Pit-1 sites (FPIV, PRL-1d), but not dimeric Pit-1 sites (FPI). Pit-1 T220A bound all sites with wild-type (WT) affinity. In transfections of HeLa cells, each Pit-1 mutant transcriptionally activated the -425rPRL promoter and cooperated with Ets-1 to WT levels. In contrast, Pit-1-mediated Ras activation of the -425 rPRL promoter was significantly inhibited by T220D. Finally, Pit-1 synergistic activation of the 2500-bp rPRL promoter with estrogen receptor was reduced by T220D compared with T220A and WT Pit-1. Thus, phosphorylation of Pit-1 T220 reduces binding to monomeric sites blunting Ras and estrogen/estrogen receptor stimulation of the rPRL gene promoter. Consequently, T220 phosphorylation of Pit-1 by protein kinase A, protein kinase C, or cell cycle-dependent kinases appears to serve as a regulatory switch, inhibiting Ras and estrogen/estrogen receptor regulatory pathways, while enhancing the cAMP/protein kinase A response, thus allowing a more precise integration of pituitary responses to distinct signaling stimuli.
Molecular Endocrinology 11/2009; 24(1):91-103. · 4.54 Impact Factor
-
Meenakshi Singh,
Nicole S Spoelstra, Annie Jean,
Erin Howe,
Kathleen C Torkko,
Hilda R Clark,
Douglas S Darling,
Kenneth R Shroyer,
Kathryn B Horwitz,
Russell R Broaddus,
Jennifer K Richer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) is a transcription factor containing two clusters of Kruppel-type zinc-fingers, by which it binds E-box-like sequences on target DNAs. A role for ZEB1 in tumor progression, specifically, epithelial to mesenchymal transitions, has recently been revealed. ZEB1 acts as a master repressor of E-cadherin and other epithelial markers. We previously demonstrated that ZEB1 is confined to the stromal compartment in normal endometrium and low-grade endometrial cancers. Here, we quantify ZEB1 protein expression in endometrial samples from 88 patients and confirm that it is expressed at significantly higher levels in the tumor-associated stroma of low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinomas (type I endometrial cancers) compared to hyperplastic or normal endometrium. In addition, as we previously reported, ZEB1 is aberrantly expressed in the epithelial-derived tumor cells of highly aggressive endometrial cancers, such as FIGO grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinomas, uterine serous carcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian tumors (classified as type II endometrial cancers). We now demonstrate, in both human endometrial cancer specimens and cell lines, that when ZEB1 is inappropriately expressed in epithelial-derived tumor cells, E-cadherin expression is repressed, and that this inverse relationship correlates with increased migratory and invasive potential. Forced expression of ZEB1 in the nonmigratory, low-grade, relatively differentiated Ishikawa cell line renders them migratory. Conversely, reduction of ZEB1 in a highly migratory and aggressive type II cell line, Hec50co, results in reduced migratory capacity. Thus, ZEB1 may be a biomarker of aggressive endometrial cancers at high risk of recurrence. It may help identify women who would most benefit from chemotherapy. Furthermore, if expression of ZEB1 in type II endometrial cancers could be reversed, it might be exploited as therapy for these highly aggressive tumors.
Modern Pathology 08/2008; 21(7):912-23. · 4.79 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The POU-homeodomain transcription factor Pit-1 governs ontogeny and cell-specific gene expression of pituitary lactotropes, somatotropes, and thyrotropes. The splice isoform, Pit-1beta, inserts a 26-amino acid (AA) repressor at AA48 in the Pit-1 transcription activation domain (TAD). The Pit-1 TAD contains a basal regulatory subregion, R1 (AA1-45), and a basal and Ras-responsive region, R2 (AA46-80). To precisely map these activities, we generated GAL4-Pit-1/Pit-1betaTAD fusions and, in full-length HA-Pit-1, a series of substitution mutants of R2. Analysis in GH4 cells identified an activation domain at AA50-70, followed by an overlapping, dual-function, Ras-responsive-inhibitory domain, located from AA60-80. In contrast, GAL4-Pit-1betaTAD repressed both basal and Ras-mediated TAD activity. To determine the functional interplay between TAD subregions and the beta-domain, we inserted the beta-domain every 10 AA across the 80-AA Pit-1 TAD. Like wild-type Pit-1beta, each construct retained transcriptional activity in HeLa cells and repressed the Ras response in GH4 cells. However, beta-domain insertion at AA61 and 71 resulted in greater repression of Ras responsiveness, defining a critical R2 TAD spanning AA61-71 of Pit-1. Furthermore, Ras activation is augmented by steroid receptor coactivator 1, whereas cAMP response element binding protein-binding protein is not a Ras mediator in this system. In summary, the Pit-1/Pit-1beta TADs are composed of multiple, modular, and transferable subdomains, including a regulatory R1 domain, a basal activation region, a selective inhibitory-Ras-responsive segment, and a beta-specific repressor domain. These data provide novel insights into the mechanisms by which the Pit-1 TAD integrates DNA binding, protein partner interactions, and distinct signaling pathways to fine-tune Pit-1 activity.
Molecular Endocrinology 02/2007; 21(1):172-85. · 4.54 Impact Factor
-
Molecular Endocrinology - MOL ENDOCRINOL. 01/2006; 21(1):172-185.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Pit-1 and Ets-1 binding to a composite element synergistically activates and targets Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling to the rat prolactin promoter. These transcriptional responses appear to depend on three molecular features: organization of the Ets-1/Pit-1 composite element, physical interaction of these two factors via the Pit-1 homeodomain (amino acids 199-291) and the Ets-1 regulatory III domain (amino acids 190-257), and assembly of their transcriptional activation domains (TADs). Here we show that the organization of the Ets-1/Pit-1 composite element tolerates significant flexibility with regard to Ras stimulation and synergy. Specifically, the putative monomeric Pit-1 binding site can be substituted with bona fide binding sites for either a Pit-1 monomer or dimer, and these sites tolerated a separation of 28 bp. Additionally, we show that the physical interaction of Ets-1 and Pit-1 is not required for Ras responsiveness or synergy because block mutations of the Pit-1 interaction surface in Ets-1, which reduced Ets-1/Pit-1 binding in vitro, did not significantly affect Ets-1 stimulation of Ras responsiveness or synergy. We also show differential use of distinct TAD subtypes and Pit-1 TAD subregions to mediate either synergy or Ras responsiveness. Specifically, TADs from Gal4, VP16, or Ets-2 regulatory III domain linked to Ets-1 DNA binding domain constructs restored synergy to these TAD/Ets-1 DNA binding domain fusions. Conversely, deletion of the defined Pit-1 TAD (amino acids 2-80) retained synergy, but not Ras responsiveness. Consequently, we further defined the Pit-1 amino-terminal TAD into region 1 (R1, amino acids 2-45) and region 2 (R2, amino acids 46-80). R1 appears to regulate basal and synergistic responses, whereas the Ras response was mapped to R2. In summary, Ras responsiveness and Pit-1/Ets-1 synergy are mediated through the assembly of distinct TADs at a flexible composite element, indicating that different mechanisms underlie these two transcriptional responses and that the Pit-1 R2 subregion represents a novel, tissue-specific Ras-responsive TAD.
Journal of Biological Chemistry 11/2003; 278(41):39684-96. · 4.77 Impact Factor
