-
Spine Journal Meeting Abstracts. 08/2012;
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion is a well-established procedure for treatment of degenerative disc disease and cervical trauma including flexion-distraction injuries. Low-profile interbody devices incorporating fixation have been introduced to avoid potential issues associated with dissection and traditional instrumentation. While these devices have been assessed in traditional models, they have not been evaluated in the setting of traumatic spine injury. This study investigated the ability of these devices to stabilize the subaxial cervical spine in the presence of flexion-distraction injuries of increasing severity. METHODS: Thirteen human cadaveric subaxial cervical spines (C3-C7) were tested at C5-C6 in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the load-control mode under ±1.5 Nm moments. Six spines were tested with locked screw configuration and seven with variable angle screw configuration. After testing the range of motion (ROM) with implanted device, progressive posterior destabilization was performed in 3 stages at C5-C6. RESULTS: The anchored spacer device with locked screw configuration significantly reduced C5-C6 flexion-extension (FE) motion from 14.8 ± 4.2 to 3.9 ± 1.8°, lateral bending (LB) from 10.3 ± 2.0 to 1.6 ± 0.8, and axial rotation (AR) from 11.0 ± 2.4 to 2.5 ± 0.8 compared with intact under (p < 0.01). The anchored spacer device with variable angle screw configuration also significantly reduced C5-C6 FE motion from 10.7 ± 1.7 to 5.5 ± 2.5°, LB from 8.3 ± 1.4 to 2.7 ± 1.0, and AR from 8.8 ± 2.7 to 4.6 ± 1.3 compared with intact (p < 0.01). The ROM of the C5-C6 segment with locked screw configuration and grade-3 F-D injury was significantly reduced from intact, with residual motions of 5.1 ± 2.1 in FE, 2.0 ± 1.1 in LB, and 3.3 ± 1.4 in AR. Conversely, the ROM of the C5-C6 segment with variable-angle screw configuration and grade-3 F-D injury was not significantly reduced from intact, with residual motions of 8.7 ± 4.5 in FE, 5.0 ± 1.6 in LB, and 9.5 ± 4.6 in AR. CONCLUSIONS: The locked screw spacer showed significantly reduced motion compared with the intact spine even in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury. The variable angle screw spacer did not sufficiently stabilize flexion-distraction injuries. The resulting motion for both constructs was higher than that reported in previous studies using traditional plating. Locked screw spacers may be utilized with additional external immobilization while variable angle screw spacers should not be used in patients with flexion-distraction injuries.
European Spine Journal 08/2012; · 1.97 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The biconvex mobile core of the CHARITÉ lumbar disc prosthesis forms two joints (spherical bearings) with the metal end plates. We quantified the intra-prosthesis motion to test the hypothesis that the total prosthesis motion would not be equally distributed between the two bearings of implanted CHARITÉ discs, which might explain the unequal wear distribution reported in explanted cores.
The hypothesis was tested by studying the flexion-extension motion responses of (1) twenty-six monosegmental CHARITÉ III discs implanted in nineteen human cadaveric lumbar spines, and (2) twenty-one CHARITÉ III discs (fifteen monosegmental, six bisegmental) implanted in eighteen patients in other published clinical studies. Intra-prosthesis motions were quantified with use of a radiographic image analysis technique.
Eighty-eight percent of the CHARITÉ discs implanted in cadaveric specimens exhibited larger motion at the superior bearing, with 54% demonstrating more than twice as much motion at the superior bearing as at the inferior bearing. The ratio of motion at the superior bearing to motion at the inferior bearing averaged 2.68 ± 1.84, which was significantly larger than 1.0 (p < 0.001). Ninety percent of prostheses implanted in patients showed larger motion at the superior bearing. The motion ratio averaged 2.39 ± 2.47 for monosegmental cases and 2.55 ± 2.66 for all cases; both ratios were significantly larger than 1.0 (p < 0.05).
We found preferentially larger motion at the superior bearing of the CHARITÉ discs implanted in human cadaveric lumbar spines and in patients, regardless of the implanted level.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 05/2012; 94(9):846-54. · 3.27 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We hypothesized that L5-S1 kinematics will not be affected by the lordosis distribution between the prosthesis endplates.
Twelve cadaveric lumbosacral spines (51.3 ± 9.8 years) were implanted with 6° or 11° prostheses (ProDisc-L) with four combinations of superior/inferior lordosis (6°/0°, 3°/3°, 11°/0°, 3°/8°). Specimens were tested intact and after prostheses implantation with different lordosis distributions. Center of rotation (COR) and range of motion (ROM) were quantified.
Six-degree lordosis prostheses (n = 7) showed no difference in flexion-extension ROM, regardless of design (6°/0° or 3°/3°) (p > 0.05). In lateral bending (LB), both designs reduced ROM (p < 0.05). In axial rotation, only the 3°/3° design reduced ROM (p < 0.05). Eleven-degree lordosis prostheses (n = 5) showed no difference in flexion-extension ROM for either design (p > 0.05). LB ROM decreased with distributed lordosis prostheses (3°/8°) (p < 0.05). Overall, L5-S1 range of motion was not markedly influenced by lordosis distribution among the two prosthesis endplates. The ProDisc-L prosthesis design where all lordosis is concentrated in the superior endplate yielded COR locations that were anterior and caudal to intact controls. The prosthesis with lordosis distributed between the two endplates yielded a COR that tended to be closer to intact.
Further clinical and biomechanical studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of lordosis angle distribution on the fate of the facet joints.
European Spine Journal 04/2012; 21 Suppl 5:S585-91. · 1.97 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: STUDY DESIGN:: A biomechanical cadaveric study of lumbar spine segments. OBJECTIVE:: To compare the immediate stability provided by parallel-shaped and anatomically shaped carbon fiber interbody fusion I/F cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) constructs with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:: Few biomechanical data are available on the anatomically shaped cages in PLIF and TLIF constructs. METHODS:: Twenty human lumbar segments were tested in flexion-extension (FE) (8 N m flexion, 6 N m extension), lateral bending (LB) (±6 N m), and torsional loading (±5 N m). Each segment was tested in the intact state and after insertion of interbody cages in one of 3 constructs: PLIF with 2 parallel-shaped or anatomically shaped cages and TLIF with 1 anatomically shaped cage. All cages received supplementary pedicle screw fixation. The range-of-motion (ROM) values after cage insertion and posterior fixation were compared with the intact specimen values using analysis of variance and multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS:: All constructs significantly reduced segmental motion relative to intact (P<0.001). The motion reductions in FE, LB, and axial rotation were 85±15%, 83±18%, and 67±6.8% for the PLIF construct using parallel cages, 79±5.5%, 87±10%, and 66±20% for PLIF using anatomically shaped cages, and 90±6.8%, 87±12%, and 77±22% for TLIF with an anatomically shaped cage. In FE and LB, the reductions in the ROM caused between the 3 constructs were equivalent (P>0.05). In axial rotation, the TLIF cage provided significantly greater limitation in the ROM compared with the parallel-shaped PLIF cage (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS:: The parallel-shaped and anatomically shaped I/F cages provided similar stability in a PLIF construct. The greater stability of the TLIF construct was likely due to a more anterior placement of the TLIF cage and preservation of the contralateral facet joint.
Journal of spinal disorders & techniques 02/2012; · 1.21 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Surgeons have questioned whether foot deformity applies abnormal loading on a knee implant. A total of 24 patients with mild knee deformity underwent a static recording of foot loading prior to and at 3 months following knee replacement. Of these patients, 13 had a preoperative varus deformity. The recorded postoperative to preoperative loading in all 6 geographic sites was decreased by an average of 10%. The largest changes were observed in the hallux and lesser toe masks, whereas the postoperative to preoperative foot pressure ratio in the metatarsal head (lateral and medial), heel, and midfoot masks was 0.94. This preliminary investigation reveals a minimal change in geographic foot loading following total knee arthroplasty in patients with mild knee deformity.
Foot & Ankle Specialist 12/2011; 5(1):17-22.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A biomechanical study of human cadaveric lumbar spine segments undergoing disc-space distraction for insertion of anterior lumbar interbody implants.
To measure the distraction force and its relaxation during a period of up to 3 hours after disc-space distraction as a function of the distraction magnitude and disc level.
Interbody implants depend on compressive preload produced by disc-space distraction (annular pretension) for initial stabilization of the implant-bone interface. However, the amount of preload produced by disc-space distraction due to insertion of the implant and its subsequent relaxation have not been quantified.
Twenty-two fresh human lumbar motion segments (age: 51 ± 14.8 years) were used. An anterior lumbar discectomy was performed. The distraction test battery consisted of a tension stiffness test performed before and after each relaxation test, 2 distraction magnitudes of 2 and 4 mm, and a recovery period before each distraction input. The distraction forces and lordosis angles were measured. RESULTS.: Peak distraction force was significantly larger for the 4-mm distraction (431.8 ± 116.4 N) than for the 2-mm distraction (204.9 ± 55.5 N) (P < 0.01). The distraction force significantly decreased over time (P < 0.01), approximating steady-state values of 146.1 ± 47.3 N at 2-mm distraction and 289.8 ± 92.8 N at 4-mm distraction, respectively. The distraction force reduced in magnitude by more than 20% of peak value in the first 15 minutes and reduced by approximately 30% of the peak value at the end of the testing period. The spine segment relaxed by the same amount of force, regardless of the disc level (P > 0.05).
The "tightness of fit" that the surgeon notes immediately after interbody device insertion in the disc space degrades in the very early postoperative period, which could compromise the stability of the bone-implant interface.
Spine 09/2011; 37(9):733-40. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In vitro biomechanical study.
To characterize cervical total disc replacement (TDR) kinematics above two-level fusion, and to determine the effect of fusion alignment on TDR response.
Cervical TDR may be a promising alternative for a symptomatic adjacent level after prior multilevel cervical fusion. However, little is known about the TDR kinematics in this setting.
Eight human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1, age: 59 ± 8.6 years) were tested intact, after simulated two-level fusion (C4-C6) in lordotic alignment and then in straight alignment, and after C3-C4 TDR above the C4-C6 fusion in lordotic and straight alignments. Fusion was simulated using an external fixator apparatus, allowing easy adjustment of C4-C6 fusion alignment, and restoration to intact state upon disassembly. Specimens were tested in flexion-extension using hybrid testing protocols.
The external fixator device significantly reduced range of motion (ROM) at C4-C6 to 2.0 ± 0.6°, a reduction of 89 ± 3.0% (P < 0.05). Removal of the fusion construct restored the motion response of the spinal segments to their intact state. The C3-C4 TDR resulted in less motion as compared to the intact segment when the disc prosthesis was implanted either as a stand-alone procedure or above a two-level fusion. The decrease in motion of C3-C4 TDR was significant for both lordotic and straight fusions across C4-C6 (P < 0.05). Flexion and extension moments needed to bring the cervical spine to similar C2 motion endpoints significantly increased for the TDR above a two-level fusion compared to TDR alone (P < 0.05). Lordotic fusion required significantly greater flexion moment, whereas straight fusion required significantly greater extension moment (P < 0.05).
TDR placed adjacent to a two-level fusion is subjected to a more challenging biomechanical environment as compared to a stand-alone TDR. An artificial disc used in such a clinical scenario should be able to accommodate the increased moment loads without causing impingement of its endplates or undue wear during the expected life of the prosthesis.
Spine 06/2011; 36(17):1359-66. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A cadaveric biomechanical study.
To investigate the biomechanical behavior of the cervical spine after cervical total disc replacement (TDR) adjacent to a fusion as compared to a two-level fusion.
There are concerns regarding the biomechanical effects of cervical fusion on the mobile motion segments. Although previous biomechanical studies have demonstrated that cervical disc replacement normalizes adjacent segment motion, there is a little information regarding the function of a cervical disc replacement adjacent to an anterior cervical decompression and fusion, a potentially common clinical application.
Nine cadaveric cervical spines (C3-T1, age: 60.2 ± 3.5 years) were tested under load- and displacement-control testing. After intact testing, a simulated fusion was performed at C4-C5, followed by C6-C7. The simulated fusion was then reversed, and the response of TDR at C5-C6 was measured. A hybrid construct was then tested with the TDR either below or above a single-level fusion and contrasted with a simulated two-level fusion (C4-C6 and C5-C7).
The external fixator device used to simulate fusion significantly reduced range of motion (ROM) at C4-C5 and C6-C7 by 74.7 ± 8.1% and 78.1 ± 11.5%, respectively (P < 0.05). Removal of the fusion construct restored the motion response of the spinal segments to their intact state. Arthroplasty performed at C5-C6 using the porous-coated motion disc prosthesis maintained the total flexion-extension ROM to the level of the intact controls when used as a stand-alone procedure or when implanted adjacent to a single-level fusion (P > 0.05). The location of the single-level fusion, whether above or below the arthroplasty, did not significantly affect the motion response of the arthroplasty in the hybrid construct. Performing a two-level fusion significantly increased the motion demands on the nonoperated segments as compared to a hybrid TDR-plus fusion construct when the spine was required to reach the same motion end points. The spine with a hybrid construct required significantly less extension moment than the spine with a two-level fusion to reach the same extension end point.
The porous-coated motion cervical prosthesis restored the ROM of the treated level to the intact state. When the porous-coated motion prosthesis was used in a hybrid construct, the TDR response was not adversely affected. A hybrid construct seems to offer significant biomechanical advantages over two-level fusion in terms of reducing compensatory adjacent-level hypermobility and also loads required to achieve a predetermined ROM.
Spine 02/2011; 36(23):1932-9. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A biomechanical study using human lumbar spines.
To test the hypotheses that with increasing implant height (1) the range of motion (ROM) of the implanted segment will decrease, (2) the segmental lordosis will increase, and (3) the size of the neural foramens will increase.
Little is known about the effects of the implant height on the segmental motion and foraminal size at the implanted level.
Seven human lumbar spines (age, 54.4+/-11.4 years; L1-sacrum) were tested intact, and after discectomy at L4-L5 and sequential insertion of ProDisc-L implants (Synthes Spine, Paoli, PA) of increasing heights (10, 12, and 14 mm). The specimens were tested in flexion (8 Nm) and extension (-6 Nm) with a 400 N follower preload as well as in lateral bending (+/-6 Nm) and axial rotation (+/-5 Nm) without preload. Three-dimensional motions were measured at L4-L5. Foraminal sizes at L4-L5 were measured in the specimen's neutral posture under a 400 N preload for the intact spine and after each implantation using finely graded cylindrical probes. Segmental lordosis was measured in the specimen's neutral posture under a 400 N preload by analyzing digital fluoroscopic images. Effects of implant height on the kinematics, foraminal size, and segmental lordosis were assessed using paired comparisons with Bonferroni correction.
Increasing implant height from 10 mm to 14 mm caused a significant decrease (P<0.05) in segmental ROM by up to 37%+/-21% in flexion/extension, 33%+/-18% in lateral bending, and 29%+/-28% in axial rotation. Increasing implant height also produced a significant increase in segmental lordosis (P<0.05): from 9.7 degrees+/-2.9 degrees at 10 mm, to 16.1 degrees+/-5.1 degrees at 14 mm. The increase in foraminal size, while significant, was only 4.6%+/-3.2% when comparing 10 mm to 14 mm implants.
These results suggest that a smaller implant height should be selected to optimize the ROM of the implanted segment and maintain sagittal balance.
Spine 09/2010; 35(19):1777-82. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Static and dynamic loading of the foot are important characteristics for understanding human walking in both health and disease. The goal of this investigation was to determine whether an objective measure of normal midstance loading of the foot could reliably be recorded using readily available disposable qualitative recording devices. Ten randomly selected normal volunteers were trained to step on Harris mat and Pressure Stat recording devices during normal walking. Each of the recordings was divided into 5 weight-bearing regions by 2 separate examiners. After outlining each foot, the recordings were digitized and compared. Interobserver reliability ranged from 0.81 to 0.96 for the Harris mat technique and 0.94 to 0.97 for the Pressure Stat technique. Data from a linear regression plot indicate high precision of calculations of the foot masks between the 2 examiners based on an R(2) value of 0.966 using the Pressure Stat method. These data plus a linear regression plot suggest that both qualitative recording devices, when digitized using a standardized format, appear to obtain a reliable objective measure of midstance loading during normal gait. The Pressure Stat device may be slightly more reliable. It is planned to use this standardized experimental model to compare objectively patterns of midstance loading in patients with injury or disease that is capable of altering normal walking.
Foot & Ankle Specialist 12/2009; 2(6):267-70.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Biomechanical study using human cadaveric cervical spines.
To evaluate the construct stability of 3 different segmental occipitoatlantoaxial (C0-C1-C2) stabilization techniques.
Different C0-C1-C2 stabilization techniques are used for unstable conditions in the upper cervical spine, all with different degrees of risk to the vertebral artery. Techniques with similar stability but less risk to the vertebral artery may be advantageous.
Six human cadaveric cervical spines (C0-C5) (age: 74 +/- 5.0 years) were used. After testing the intact spines, instability was created by transecting the transverse and alar ligaments. The spines were instrumented from the occiput to C2 using 3 different techniques which varied in their attachment to C2. All spines had 6 screws placed into the occiput along with lateral mass screws at C1. The 3 variations used in attachment to C2 were (1) C2 crossing laminar screws, (2) C2 pedicle screws, and (3) C1-C2 transarticular screws. The C1 lateral mass screws were removed before placement of the C1-C2 transarticular screws. Range of motion across C0-C2 was measured for each construct. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. The following post hoc comparisons were made: (1) intact spine versus each of the 3 techniques, (2) laminar screw technique versus the pedicle screw technique, and (3) laminar screw technique versus the transarticular screw technique. The level of significance was alpha = 0.01 (after Bonferroni correction for 5 comparisons).
All 3 stabilization techniques significantly decreased range of motion across C0-C2 compared to the intact spine (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference among the 3 stabilization methods in flexion/extension and axial rotation. In lateral bending, the technique using C2 crossing laminar screws demonstrated a trend toward increased range of motion compared to the other 2 techniques. CT scans in both axial and sagittal views demonstrated greater proximity to the vertebral artery in the pedicle and transarticular screw techniques compared to the crossing laminar screw technique.
Occipitoatlantoaxial stabilization techniques using C2 crossing laminar screws, C2 pedicles screws, and C1-C2 transarticular screws offer similar biomechanical stability. Using the C2 crossing laminar screw technique may offer an advantage over the other techniques due to the reduction of the risk to the vertebral artery during C2 screw placement.
Spine 12/2009; 34(25):2740-4. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Biomechanical study using human cadaver spines.
To characterize kinematics of cervical spines implanted with total disc replacement (TDR) at 2-levels referencing the implanted and adjacent levels.
Cervical TDR is an appealing alternative to fusion particularly when treating multilevel disease, where the advantages of maintaining motion and reducing adjacent level stresses with TDR are compelling. To our knowledge there are no biomechanical studies evaluating multilevel cervical TDR.
Six human cadaveric cervical spine specimens (C3-C7, age: 57 +/- 12 years) were tested (i) intact, (ii) after TDR (Discover, DePuy, Raynham, MA) at C5-C6, and (iii) after additional TDR at C6-C7. Specimens were subjected to flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation (+/-1.5 Nm). Segmental range of motion (ROM) was measured using optoelectronic instrumentation and fluoroscopy.
Insertion of TDR at C5-C6 increased flexion/extension ROM of the implanted segment compared with intact (8.6 +/- 1.0 vs. 12.3 +/- 3.3 degrees , P < 0.025). The TDR maintained ROM to intact levels in lateral bending (7.4 +/- 2.6 vs 6.0 +/- 1.6, P > 0.025) and axial rotation (5.5 +/- 1.9 vs. 6.0 +/- 2.9, P > 0.025). The TDR at C5-C6 did not affect ROM at the adjacent levels. Implantation of a second TDR at C6-C7 maintained the ROM at that segment to intact values in flexion/extension (9.6 +/- 4.3 vs. 11.2 +/- 5.5, P > 0.025), lateral bending (6.1 +/- 4.0 vs. 4.1 +/- 2.1, P > 0.025), and axial rotation (6.7 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.5 +/- 3.7, P > 0.025). The second TDR at C6-C7 did not affect the ROM of the prosthesis implanted at C5-C6. Two-level TDR at C5-C6-C7 did not affect the ROM at C4-C5 in flexion/extension or axial rotation, however, in lateral bending a small increase occurred (8.9 +/- 3.6 vs. 10.1 +/- 4.5, P < 0.025).
Cervical TDR at 2 levels can provide near-normal mobility at both levels without destabilizing the implanted segments or affecting adjacent segment motions. These observations lend support to the notion that single or multilevel cervical TDR may be advantageous when compared to fusion.
Spine 10/2009; 34(22):E794-9. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: An in vitro three-dimensional (3D) flexibility test of human C3-C7 cervical spine specimens.
To test the hypothesis that anterior cervical fusion with a wedged graft and a locked plate can effectively stabilize the cervical spine after complete anterior and posterior segmental ligamentous release.
Distraction-flexion Stage 3 injuries of the lower cervical spine (bilateral facet dislocations) are usually reduced under awake cranial traction. When the magnetic resonance imaging reveals a traumatic disc prolapse, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is usually recommended. Most authors advise combining ACDF with posterior instrumentation to address the insufficiency of the posterior elements. However, there is clinical evidence that ACDF with a locked plate alone suffices for the treatment of these injuries, especially in young patients. Still, there are no biomechanical studies on the effect of a locked plate on the complete anterior and posterior ligamentous-deficient young cervical spine under physiologic preload.
Eight fresh frozen human lower cervical spines (C3-C7) from young donors (age, 44.5 years; range, 21-63 years) were used. A 3D flexibility test was conducted using a moment of 0.8 Nm without preload. Flexion-extension was additionally tested using a moment of 1.5 Nm under 0 and 150 N follower preload. Spines were tested first intact, then after complete C5-C6 discectomy with posterior longitudinal ligament resection and ACDF with a wedged bone graft and a rigid locked plate, and finally after complete release of the supraspinous, interspinous, and intertransverse ligaments; the facet capsules; and ligamentum flavum. RESULTS.: When tested under 0.8 Nm moment without preload, complete posterior and anterior ligamentous release did not significantly increase the ROM of the ACDF construct in flexion-extension (P > 0.025), lateral bending (P > 0.025), and axial rotation (P > 0.025). When tested under 1.5 Nm moment with or without a compressive preload, the complete posterior and anterior ligamentous release did not significantly affect the ROM of the ACDF construct (P > 0.01). The application of preload significantly reduced the motion at the C5-C6 ACDF construct with ligamentous disruption in comparison with the motion in the absence of a preload (P < 0.01).
Anterior cervical fusion with a wedged graft and a rigid constrained (locked) plate can effectively stabilize the nonosteoporotic cervical spine after complete posterior element injury when excessive ROM is prevented (for example, by the use of postoperative external immobilization). Even when the construct is subjected to higher moments, adequate stability can be achieved when physiologic preload is present. Osteoporosis and lack of sufficient preload due to poor neuromuscular control may affect long-term screw stability, and additional external immobilization may be needed until fusion matures.
Spine 01/2009; 34(1):E9-15. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lumbar fusion is traditionally used to restore stability after wide surgical decompression for spinal stenosis. The Total Facet Arthroplasty System (TFAS) is a motion-restoring implant suggested as an alternative to rigid fixation after complete facetectomy.
To investigate the effect of TFAS on the kinematics of the implanted and adjacent lumbar segments.
Biomechanical in vitro study.
Nine human lumbar spines (L1 to sacrum) were tested in flexion-extension (+8 to -6Nm), lateral bending (+/-6Nm), and axial rotation (+/-5Nm). Flexion-extension was tested under 400 N follower preload. Specimens were tested intact, after complete L3 laminectomy with L3-L4 facetectomy, after L3-L4 pedicle screw fixation, and after L3-L4 TFAS implantation. Range of motion (ROM) was assessed in all tested directions. Neutral zone and stiffness in flexion and extension were calculated to assess quality of motion.
Complete laminectomy-facetectomy increased L3-L4 ROM compared with intact in flexion-extension (8.7+/-2.0 degrees to 12.2+/-3.2 degrees, p<.05) lateral bending (9.0+/-2.5 degrees to 12.6+/-3.2 degrees, p=.09), and axial rotation (3.8+/-2.7 degrees to 7.8+/-4.5 degrees p<.05). Pedicle screw fixation decreased ROM compared with intact, resulting in 1.7+/-0.5 degrees flexion-extension (p<.05), 3.3+/-1.4 degrees lateral bending (p<.05), and 1.8+/-0.6 degrees axial rotation (p=.09). TFAS restored intact ROM (p>.05) resulting in 7.9+/-2.1 degrees flexion-extension, 10.1+/-3.0 degrees lateral bending, and 4.7+/-1.6 degrees axial rotation. Fusion significantly increased the normalized ROM at all remaining lumbar segments, whereas TFAS implantation resulted in near-normal distribution of normalized ROM at the implanted and remaining lumbar segments. Flexion and extension stiffness in the high-flexibility zone decreased after facetectomy (p<.05) and increased after simulated fusion (p<.05). TFAS restored quality of motion parameters (load-displacement curves) to intact (p>.05). The quality of motion parameters for the whole lumbar spine mimicked L3-L4 segmental results.
TFAS restored range and quality of motion at the operated segment to intact values and restored near-normal motion at the adjacent segments.
The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 04/2008; 9(1):96-102. · 2.90 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Biomechanical study using human cadaver spines.
To assess the stabilizing effect of a supplemental anterior tension band (ATB, Synthes) plate on L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using a femoral ring allograft (FRA) under physiologic compressive preloads, and to compare the results with the stability achieved using FRA with supplemental transpedicular instrumentation.
Posterior instrumentation can improve the stability of ALIF cages. Anterior plates have been proposed as an alternative to avoid the additional posterior approach.
Eight human specimens (L3 to sacrum) were tested in the following sequence: (i) intact, (ii) after anterior insertion of an FRA at L5-S1, (iii) after instrumentation with the ATB plate, and (iv) after removal of the plate and adding transpedicular instrumentation at the same level. Specimens were tested in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Flexion-extension was tested under 0 N, 400 N, and 800 N compressive follower preload to simulate physiologic compressive preloads on the lumbar spine.
Stand-alone FRAs significantly decreased the range of motion (ROM) in all tested directions (P < 0.05); however, the resultant ROM was large in flexion-extension ranging between 6.1 +/- 3.1 degrees and 5.1 +/- 2.2 degrees under 0 N to 800 N preloads. The ATB plate resulted in a significant additional decrease in flexion-extension ROM under 400 N and 800 N preloads (P < 0.05). The flexion-extension ROM with the ATB plate was 4.1 +/- 2.3 under 0 N preload and ranged from 3.1 +/- 1.8 to 2.4 +/- 1.3 under 400 N to 800 N preloads. The plate did not significantly decrease lateral bending or axial rotation ROM compared with stand-alone FRA (P > 0.05), but the resultant ROM was 2.7 +/-1.9 degrees and 0.9 +/- 0.6 degrees , respectively. Compared with the ATB plate, the transpedicular instrumentation resulted in significantly less ROM in flexion-extension and lateral bending (P < 0.05), but not in axial rotation (P > 0.05).
The ATB plate can significantly increase the stability of the anterior FRA at L5-S1 level. Although supplemental transpedicular instrumentation results in a more stable biomechanical environment, the resultant ROM with the addition of a plate is small, especially under physiologic preload, suggesting that the plate can sufficiently resist motion. Therefore, clinical assessment of the ATB plate as an alternative to transpedicular instrumentation to enhance ALIF cage stability is considered reasonable.
Spine 01/2008; 33(2):E38-43. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In vitro biomechanical study.
To quantify the effects of uncinatectomy on cervical motion after total disc replacement (TDR).
The effect of uncinatectomy on TDR motion is unknown. Partial uncinatectomy may be required to decompress the foramen; however, the residual uncinates can potentially limit TDR motion and serve as a source of progressive spondylosis. Complete resection of the uncinates may decrease this risk yet endanger destabilizing the segment.
Seven human cervical spines (C3-C7) (age, 63.4 +/- 6.9 years) were tested first intact and then after implantation of a metal-on-polyethylene ball-and-socket semiconstrained prosthesis at C5-C6. Following this, gradually increased uncinatectomy was performed in the following order: 1) right partial-posteromedial (two thirds), 2) right complete, and 3) bilateral complete resection. Specimens were tested in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (+/-1.5 Nm). Flexion-extension was tested under 150 N follower preload.
TDR without uncinatectomy increased C5-C6 flexion-extension range of motion from 8.4 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees to 11.6 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees, but statistical significance was not reached (P > 0.05). Lateral bending decreased from 6.2 degrees +/- 2.2 degrees to 3.1 degrees +/- 1.4 degrees, with a trend for statistical significance (P = 0.07). Axial rotation decreased from 5.5 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees to 4.3 degrees +/- 1.4 degrees after the implantation (P > 0.05). Both right partial and right complete uncinatectomy resulted in nearly symmetrical restoration of lateral bending to intact values and significantly increased flexion-extension compared with intact (P < or = 0.05); however, axial rotation still did not differ from intact (P > 0.05). Complete bilateral resection also restored lateral bending to intact values (7.3 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees, P > 0.05); however, it resulted in significant increase in range of motion in flexion-extension (14.1 degrees +/- 3.0 degrees, P < or = 0.05) and axial rotation (8.7 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees, P < or = 0.05).
Unilateral complete or even partial uncinatectomy can normalize lateral bending after TDR. Bilateral complete uncinatectomy is not necessary to restore lateral bending and may result in significantly increased range of motion in flexion-extension and axial rotation compared with intact values.
Spine 12/2007; 32(26):2965-9. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The authors conducted an in vitro biomechanical flexibility study of T2-S1 specimens in flexion-extension under compressive follower preloads of physiological magnitudes.
The objectives of this study were to test the hypotheses that 1) the thoracolumbar spine will support compressive preloads of in vivo magnitudes and 2) allow physiological mobility under flexion-extension moments if the preload is applied along an optimized follower load path that approximates the kypholordotic curve of the thoracolumbar spine.
In the absence of muscle forces, the ligamentous thoracolumbar spine specimens cannot support the compressive loads expected in vivo. As a result, the flexibility of the thoracolumbar spine in flexion-extension has not been studied in vitro under physiological compressive preloads.
Seven human thoracolumbar spines (T2-sacrum) were subjected to flexion and extension moments (up to 8 and 6 Nm, respectively) under compressive preloads from 0 to 800 N applied along an optimized follower preload path. The experimental technique applied the compressive preload such that: 1) it minimized the internal shear forces and bending moments resulting from the preload application, 2) made the internal force resultant compressive, and 3) caused the preload path to approximate the tangent to the curve of the thoracolumbar spine. The range of motion was measured in the T2-sacrum, T2-T11, T11-L1, and L1-sacrum regions.
All thoracolumbar specimens supported the compressive follower preload up to 800 N without damage or instability. At 800 N preload, the total flexion-extension range of motion of the T2-sacrum region decreased by 22%, from a mean of 73 degrees to 57 degrees (P < 0.05). The range of motion of the T2-T11 and L1-sacrum regions decreased from the baseline value by 23% and 30%, respectively, at a preload of 800 N. The sagittal mobility of the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L1) was not affected by the preload. The follower preload did not significantly affect the proportion of the total T2-sacrum flexion-extension range of motion contributed by the T2-T11 and L1-sacrum regions of the thoracolumbar spine.
The optimized follower preload vector minimizes the effects of artifact moment and shear force on the range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine in flexion-extension. This model allows the entire thoracolumbar spine to be investigated under physiological loading for different clinical applications.
Spine 12/2004; 29(22):E510-4. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A biomechanical study of lumbar threaded interbody cage construct under varying compressive preloads of similar magnitudes to those experienced in vivo during daily activities.
To test the hypothesis that supplemental translaminar facet screws would enhance the stability (ability to reduce segmental angular motion) of threaded interbody cages in flexion-extension during activities in which the spine is subjected to low compressive preloads, and therefore the stand-alone interbody cage construct is least stable.
Controversy exists over whether threaded anteriorly placed interbody cages can be routinely used as "stand-alone" devices or whether they require supplemental posterior stabilization to achieve successful fusion. Biomechanical studies suggest that under conditions of low preloads, the motion segment treated with stand-alone cages might be less stable, particularly in extension. METHODS.: Eight human lumbar spine specimens (from L1 to sacrum) were tested intact, after insertion of 2 threaded cylindrical cages (BAK) at L5-S1 and after supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation. They were subjected to flexion and extension moments under progressively increasing magnitude of externally applied compressive follower preload from 0 to 1200 N. The range of angular motion in flexion-extension at L5-S1 was analyzed to assess the effect of translaminar facet screws on the stability of the cage construct for different compressive preloads.
In flexion, over 0 to 400 N preload, the supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation reduced the L5-S1 angular motion relative to intact by 71% to 74% as compared to 40% to 44% for the cages alone. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In extension at 0 N preload, the cages allowed more angular motion than the intact segment, whereas with translaminar facet screw fixation, the motion was reduced to the level of the intact segment. At 400 N preload, supplemental TLFS fixation significantly increased the stability of the cages, reducing the extension angular motion by 60% of intact (P = 0.04). Supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation did not significantly increase the stability provided by the cages in flexion or extension at the 1200 N preload magnitude.
In vivo during activities of daily living, interbody cage constructs are subject to varying compressive preloads due to external loads generated by paraspinal musculature, and our results suggest that the stability created by the cage (reduction in segmental angular motion) is not constant. The cage construct is likely to be least stable in extension during activities that impart low compressive preloads to the lumbar spine. Supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation will enhance stability of the motion segment treated with threaded cages, particularly during conditions of low compressive preloads, the very condition in which the cage alone is least effective in providing stability.
Spine 08/2004; 29(16):1731-6. · 2.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Insertion of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage has been shown to reduce motion in a human spine segment in all loading directions except extension. The "stand-alone" cages depend on compressive preload produced by anular pretensioning and muscle forces for initial stabilization. However, the effect that the in vivo compressive preload generated during activities of daily living has on the construct is not fully understood. This study tested the hypothesis that the ability of the cages to reduce the segmental motions in flexion and extension is significantly affected by the magnitude of the externally applied compressive preload.
Fourteen specimens from human lumbar spines were tested intact and after insertion of two threaded cylindrical cages at level L5-Sl. They were subjected to flexion and extension moments under progressively increasing magnitudes of externally applied compressive follower preload from 0 to 1200 N. The range of motion at level L5-S1 after cage insertion was compared with the value achieved in the intact specimens at each compressive preload magnitude.
The cages significantly reduced the L5-S1 flexion motion at all preloads (p < 0.05). They decreased flexion motion by 29% to 43% of that of the intact specimens for low preloads (0 to 400 N) and by 69% to 79% of that of the intact specimens under preloads of 800 to 1200 N. In extension, in the absence of an externally applied preload, the cages permitted 24% more motion than the intact segment (p < 0.05). In contrast, they reduced the extension motion at preloads from 200 to 1200 N. Under preloads of 800 to 1200 N, the reduction in extension motion after cage placement was 42% to 48% of that of the intact segment (p < 0.05). The reduction of motion in both flexion and extension after cage placement was significantly greater at preloads of 800 to 1200 N compared with the motion reductions at preloads of < or =400 N (p < 0.05).
In contrast to the observed extension instability under anular tension preload only, the two-cage construct exerted a stabilizing effect on the motion segment (a reduction in segmental motion) in flexion as well as extension under externally applied compressive preloads of physiologic magnitudes. The external compressive preload significantly affected the stabilization provided by the cages. The cages provided substantially more stabilization, both in flexion and in extension, at larger preloads than at smaller preloads. Clinical Relevance: The study suggests that the segment treated with an anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage is relatively less stable under conditions of low external compressive preload. The magnitude of preload required to achieve stabilization with stand-alone cages may be only partially achieved by anular pretensioning. Since the magnitude of the preload across the disc space due to muscle activity can vary with activities of daily living, supplemental stabilization of the cage construct may provide a more predictably stable environment for lumbar spine fusion.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 09/2003; 85-A(9):1749-56. · 3.27 Impact Factor
