Publications (7)20.92 Total impact
-
Article: Effect of subcentimeter nonpositive resection margin on hepatic recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Evidences from 663 liver resections.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To elucidate if a nonpositive <1-cm resection margin has any effect on hepatic recurrence in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Six hundred and nine patients underwent 663 liver resections. Patients with positive margin were excluded from the analysis. Two groups were studied: group A, <1-cm resection margin and group B, > or =1-cm resection margin. A total of 545 liver resections in 523 patients were carried out with nonpositive resection margins. With a median follow-up of 25 months, the 5-year cumulative hepatic recurrence reached 54% in group A (n = 206) and 41% in group B (n = 339). Factors associated with hepatic recurrence were synchronic metastases (P = 0.0015), bilobar (P < 0.001), two or more metastases (P < 0.001), margin <1 cm (P = 0.0123) and extrahepatic disease (P = 0.0037). A strong correlation between resection margin and number of metastases was confirmed (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis only two factors were independent predictors of hepatic recurrence: multinodular disease in the liver specimen [> or =4 metastases hazard ratio (HR) = 3.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-5.38; P < 0.001] and extrahepatic disease at hepatectomy (HR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.58-3.32). Subcentimeter nonpositive resection margins do not directly influence hepatic recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.Annals of Oncology 07/2007; 18(7):1190-5. · 6.43 Impact Factor -
Article: Surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients. When is it worthwhile?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The elderly are under-represented in series of patients operated on for colorectal liver metastases (LM). To analyse the influence of age on surgery of colorectal LM, and the identification of factors that could be used as exclusion criteria. Six hundred and forty-eight patients underwent liver resection between 1990 and 2006. Demographic data, primary tumour related variables, stage of the disease, morbidity, mortality, survival and recurrence were prospectively recorded. One hundred and sixty of 648 patients (25%) were 70 years old or older. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in elderly patients (8% vs. 3%, p=0.008). Morbidity was also higher (41% vs. 34%, p=0.008). Survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 years was 88%, 62% and 45% respectively in patients younger than 70 years, and 82%, 48% and 36% in the elderly (p=0.007). Excluding the postoperative mortality, the figures were 90%, 64% and 46%. 90%, 53% and 38% (p=0.061). Disease-free survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years excluding postoperative mortality were 68%, 32% and 25% in younger patients, compared to 68%, 34% and 30% (p=0.71) in the elderly. Major liver resections increased mortality in the elderly. In the multivariate analyses only a tumour size equal to or more than 10 cm significantly increased the postoperative mortality risk in elderly patients. The elderly have a higher mortality. In recent years that difference has been markedly reduced. Excluding the postoperative mortality, the overall survival and disease-free survival are similar between both groups. The criteria to indicate surgery must be the same in both groups.Clinical and Translational Oncology 07/2007; 9(6):392-400. · 1.33 Impact Factor -
Article: Causes of mortality after liver transplantation: period of main incidence.
Transplantation Proceedings 03/2002; 34(1):287-9. · 1.00 Impact Factor -
Article: Temporary portocaval shunt during liver transplantation with vena cava preservation. Results of a prospective randomized study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study aims to determine whether the use of a temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) improves hemodynamic and metabolic evolution during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Preservation of the vena cava during OLT has gained wide acceptance. However, benefits of adding a temporary PCS to the piggyback technique during the anhepatic phase in patients with cirrhosis have not been shown. Eighty patients with cirrhosis were studied prospectively. They were randomly distributed into two groups: patients with a temporary PCS (n = 40) and those without a PCS (n = 40). In all cases, the piggyback technique was used. Hemodynamic profiles and biochemical data during OLT and clinical evolution after OLT were evaluated. Preoperative data were similar in both groups. Surgical time also was similar (403 +/- 77 v 387 +/- 56 minutes; P = .3). Red blood cell requirements were lower in the PCS group (2.3 +/- 2.5 v 3.3 +/- 2.9 units), although differences were not significant. In the PCS group, 45% of patients did not need red blood cell transfusion, whereas in the other group, only 22% were not administered a transfusion (P = .03). During the anhepatic phase, the decrease in cardiac output was lower in the PCS group (-9.6% v -19%; P = .05), whereas diuresis during the anhepatic phase was greater in the PCS group (3.6 +/- 2.97 v 2.1 +/- 1.38 mL/kg/h; P = .005). There were no differences in liver biochemical parameters during the first 3 postoperative days. Nevertheless, creatinine levels increased significantly during this period only in the no-PCS group. The use of a temporary PCS during OLT improves hemodynamic status, reduces intraoperative transfusion requirements, and preserves renal function during and after OLT.Liver Transplantation 11/2001; 7(10):904-11. · 3.39 Impact Factor -
Article: [Clinical study of 437 consecutive hepatectomies].
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this prospective study was to analyze the risk of liver resection in unselected patients. From 1990 to 2000, 437 consecutive hepatectomies were performed in our center. Most frequent indications were liver metastases (n = 288), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 62), Klatskin tumor (n = 17), gallblader carcinoma (n = 139) and other malignant tumors (n = 6). The indication was a benign tumor in 51 patients. In 357 cases the liver parenchyma was normal, 51 patients had an underlying cirrhosis and 17 patients had an obstructive jaundice. Overall mortality was 3.6% (15 cases). Mortality in benign tumors was lacking. The prevalence of postoperative complications was 43.9%, which was mainly influenced by malignancy (46.9% vs 21.6%, p = 0.001) and type of tumor (Klastkin tumor, p # 0.001). Major liver resection (p < 0.001), blood transfusion (p < 0.001), age over 60 years (p = 0.001) and the type of hepatectomy (p < 0.001) also increased significantly the morbidity. The prevalence of biliary fistula was 11.2%, which was mainly related to the type of hepatectomy (major hepatectomy; p = 0.002) and a biliary-enteric anastomosis (p < 0.001). The prevalence of hepatic insufficiency was 3.6%, and chief risk factors for its development were underlying liver disease and major liver resection (p = 0.017). Mortality after hepatectomy in experienced centers is low. Morbidity is mainly related to the amount of parenchyma resected, type of hepatectomy, underlying liver disease and associated procedures. Liver resection should be performed preferentially in centers with high volume by specialized surgeons.Medicina Clínica 07/2001; 117(2):41-4. · 1.38 Impact Factor -
Article: The impact of donor age on liver transplantation: influence of donor age on early liver function and on subsequent patient and graft survival.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The urgent need to increase the organ donor pool has led to the expansion of criteria for donor selection. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of donor age on early graft function, subsequent graft loss, and mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Data on LT were evaluated retrospectively in a population-based cohort of 400 LTs in 348 patients. Of these, 21 (5%) were from donors >70 years old. Pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics and the evolution of recipients were analyzed. The influence of donor age as a risk factor was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Actuarial graft survival was 89% at 1 month after LT, 81% after 6 months, and 59% after 60 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only donor age (>70 years old) was associated with a higher risk of long-term graft loss (relative risk [RR]=1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1-1.9; P=0.03) and mortality (RR=1.7, 95% CI=1.2-2.3; P=0.01). Graft survival of septuagenarian livers was 80% at 1 month after LT, 56% after 6 months, and 25% after 54 months. Actuarial survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier curves) also demonstrated worse evolution in recipients of livers from old donors (log-rank test, P<0.001). Advanced donor age is associated with lower graft and recipient survival.Transplantation 07/2001; 71(12):1765-71. · 4.00 Impact Factor -
Article: Changing strategies in diagnosis and management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is one of the most difficult tumors to stage and treat. This study aims to evaluate (1) the best diagnostic imaging, (2) the usefulness of preoperative biliary drainage, (3) the resectability rate, and (4) the results of palliative treatments and surgical resection. Seventy-six patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma with a mean age of 64 +/- 11 years were treated at our institution from 1989 to 1999. Patients were studied preoperatively using ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and percutaneous cholangiography or magnetic resonance cholangiography. Forty-eight patients (63%) underwent palliative treatment. Twenty-eight patients underwent surgical curative therapy; 20 resections and 8 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs). Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography was performed in 18 of 28 patients (64%), and magnetic resonance cholangiography in 5 patients; both methods were equally effective in establishing tumoral invasion of the biliary ducts. Five patients did not undergo either diagnostic modality. Excluding the patients who underwent OLT, no significant differences were found in surgical mortality (1 v 2 patients) or postoperative morbidity (100% v 66%) for patients with and without preoperative biliary drainage. The postoperative mortality rate was 11% (3 of 28 patients). The overall resectability rate was 37%. Mean survival in the surgical and palliative groups was 35 and 6 months, respectively (P <.0001). Patients who underwent OLT had a better 5-year survival rate than those treated by tumor resection (36% v 21%; P =.02). Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy apparently did not provide a significant survival benefit. Helical CT and magnetic resonance cholangiography are useful techniques to delineate tumor extent and rule out vascular invasion and lymph node or liver metastases. No clear conclusions regarding preoperative drainage can be drawn from this study. A high resectability rate (37%) is feasible with major hepatectomy.Liver Transplantation 11/2000; 6(6):786-94. · 3.39 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
Institutions
-
2002
-
University of Barcelona
- Departament de Medicina
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
-
