-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Introduction. Ewing's sarcomas (EWSs) of bone and soft tissue are neuroectodermal tumors that affect both axial and appendicular locations. We hypothesized that axial location predicted poor outcome in EWS patients. Materials and Methods. Sixty-seven patients (57 with bone EWS and 10 with soft tissue EWS) were identified from our database. Thirty-four (51%) had axial EWS and 33 (49%) had appendicular EWS. Statistical analyses identified predictors of poor outcome. Results and Discussion. Axial location, large size, metastases at presentation, lack of definitive treatment, and positive surgical margins all correlated with poor outcome in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, axial location still predicted poor outcome when adjusted for pretreatment variables. Axial location was not statistically predictive of poor outcome when adjusted for treatment variables. Conclusions. Anatomic location has a negative effect on outcome in EWS that cannot be completely explained by pretreatment or treatment factors. Additional studies are required to determine if there is a biologic difference between axial and appendicular EWS.
Sarcoma 01/2011; 2011:395180.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and present predominantly in middle-aged and older individuals. Historically, the outlook for patients with GISTs was very poor because of the general lack of efficacy of conventional chemotherapy and the often limited surgical options. However, the recognition of the role of mutations of the v-kit Hardy/Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog KIT and the platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha gene PDGFRα in the development of GISTs led to the evaluation of potential antitumor effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and, more recently, sunitinib. Consequently, these molecularly targeted therapies were introduced into clinical practice, and the outcome for patients with GISTs improved considerably. In the last few years, the European Society of Medical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the Canadian Advisory Committee on GIST each published a major set of guidelines or practice recommendations for the management of patients with GIST. In the current review, the latest recommendations from each organization are summarized in terms of diagnosis and risk assessment, tumor staging, surgical and/or drug treatment of primary resectable and recurrent metastatic disease, and patient follow-up and assessment. In addition, areas of consensus and points of divergence among the guidelines are highlighted along with any unresolved issues.
Cancer 11/2010; 116(22):5126-37. · 4.77 Impact Factor
-
The Lancet 04/2010; 375(9721):1224. · 38.28 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate changes in circulating levels of soluble KIT (sKIT) extracellular domain as a potential biomarker for clinical outcome in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients treated with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib following imatinib failure in a previously reported phase III study.
Patients received sunitinib 50 mg/d (n = 243) or placebo (n = 118) daily in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off treatment). Plasma sKIT levels were sampled every 2 weeks in cycle 1 and on days 1 and 28 of subsequent cycles; analyzed by ELISA; and evaluated using Prentice criteria, Cox proportional hazards models, and proportion of treatment effect (PTE) analysis.
From 4 weeks on treatment and onward, significant differences were shown between treatment groups (P < 0.0001) in sKIT level changes from baseline (median levels decreased with sunitinib and increased with placebo). Decreases in sKIT levels were a significant predictor of longer time to tumor progression (TTP). Patients with reduced levels at the end of cycle 2 had a median TTP of 34.3 weeks versus 16.0 weeks for patients with increased levels [hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.61-0.83; P < 0.0001], and changes in sKIT levels replaced treatment as a stronger predictor of TTP (PTE, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34-3.70), showing even greater surrogacy on cycle 3 day 1 (PTE, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.39-3.40).
The results suggest that circulating plasma sKIT levels seem to function as a surrogate marker for TTP in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. Additional studies are warranted to confirm and expand these findings.
Clinical Cancer Research 09/2009; 15(18):5869-77. · 7.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Single slice dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) appears to provide perfusion data about sarcomas in vivo that correlate with tumor necrosis on equivalent pathological sections. However, sarcomas are heterogeneous and therefore single slice DCE-MRI may not correlate with total tumor necrosis.
To determine whether changes in pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MRI, during chemotherapy for primary bone sarcomas correlated with histological measures of total tumor necrosis.
Twelve patients with appendicular primary bone sarcomas were included in the study. Each patient had DCE-MRI before, and after completion, of pre-operative chemotherapy. The mean arterial slope (A), endothelial permeability coefficient (K(trans)), and extravascular extracellular volume (V(e)) were derived from each data set using a modified two compartment pharmacokinetic model. Total tumor necrosis rates were compared with changes in A, K(trans), and V(e).
Six patients had total tumor necrosis of >or=90% and six had a measure of <90%. The median percentage changes in A, K(trans), and V(e) for the >or=90% necrosis group were -52.5% (-83 to 6), -66% (-82 to 26), and 23.5% (-26 to 40), respectively. For the <90% necrosis group, A = - 35% (-75 to 132), K(trans)= - 53 (-66 to 149) and V(e)= - 14.5% (-42 to 40). One patient with >90% necrosis had increases in all three measures. Comparison of the two groups generated P-values of 0.699 for A, 0.18 for K(trans), and 0.31 for V(e).
There was no statistically significant correlation between changes in pharmacokinetic perfusion parameters and total tumor necrosis. When using single slice DCE-MRI heterogeneous histology of primary bone sarcomas and repair mediated angiogenesis might both be confounding factors.
Acta Radiologica 06/2009; 50(5):512-20. · 1.37 Impact Factor
-
Ronald P Dematteo,
Karla V Ballman,
Cristina R Antonescu,
Robert G Maki,
Peter W T Pisters,
George D Demetri, Martin E Blackstein,
Charles D Blanke,
Margaret von Mehren,
Murray F Brennan,
Shreyaskumar Patel,
Martin D McCarter,
Jonathan A Polikoff,
Benjamin R Tan,
Kouros Owzar
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour is the most common sarcoma of the intestinal tract. Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule that inhibits activation of the KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha proteins, and is effective in first-line treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour. We postulated that adjuvant treatment with imatinib would improve recurrence-free survival compared with placebo after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour.
We undertook a randomised phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Eligible patients had complete gross resection of a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour at least 3 cm in size and positive for the KIT protein by immunohistochemistry. Patients were randomly assigned, by a stratified biased coin design, to imatinib 400 mg (n=359) or to placebo (n=354) daily for 1 year after surgical resection. Patients and investigators were blinded to the treatment group. Patients assigned to placebo were eligible to crossover to imatinib treatment in the event of tumour recurrence. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival, and analysis was by intention to treat. Accrual was stopped early because the trial results crossed the interim analysis efficacy boundary for recurrence-free survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00041197.
All randomised patients were included in the analysis. At median follow-up of 19.7 months (minimum-maximum 0-56.4), 30 (8%) patients in the imatinib group and 70 (20%) in the placebo group had had tumour recurrence or had died. Imatinib significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with placebo (98% [95% CI 96-100] vs 83% [78-88] at 1 year; hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [0.22-0.53]; one-sided p<0.0001). Adjuvant imatinib was well tolerated, with the most common serious events being dermatitis (11 [3%] vs 0), abdominal pain (12 [3%] vs six [1%]), and diarrhoea (ten [2%] vs five [1%]) in the imatinib group and hyperglycaemia (two [<1%] vs seven [2%]) in the placebo group.
Adjuvant imatinib therapy is safe and seems to improve recurrence-free survival compared with placebo after the resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour.
US National Institutes of Health and Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
The Lancet 03/2009; 373(9669):1097-104. · 38.28 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The interstitial cells of Cajal have been identified in locations beyond the gastrointestinal tract, including the prostate, uterus and bladder. Indeed, there are reports of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) arising from each of these sites. We report the case of a 72-year old male who presented with benign prostatic hypertrophy and was diagnosed on retropubic prostatectomy as having a GIST. While the initial clinical and radiologic impression was that of a primary prostatic GIST, subsequent imaging ultimately revealed a small rectal extension as the source of the lesion. The purpose of our report is to highlight the need to assiduously rule-out gastrointestinal sources of GIST prior to making the diagnosis of primary prostatic GIST.
The Canadian Journal of Urology 07/2008; 15(3):4112-4. · 0.64 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This paper examines the challenge of conducting economic evaluations to support patient access to cancer therapies when the cost-effectiveness estimation is hampered by crossover trial design. To demonstrate these limitations, we present the submission to the Canadian Drug Review (CDR) of a cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib versus best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour in patients intolerant or resistant to imatinib. The economic model generated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for sunitinib versus BSC of dollars 79,884/quality-adjusted life-year gained. Eight months after initial submission, CDR granted a final recommendation to fund sunitinib following the manufacturer's appeal against their first recommendation. Although cost-effectiveness is an important consideration in reimbursement decisions, there is a need for improved decision-making processes for cancer drugs, as well as a better understanding of the limitations of clinical trial design.
European Journal of Cancer 06/2008; 44(7):972-7. · 5.54 Impact Factor
-
George D Demetri,
Allan T van Oosterom,
Christopher R Garrett, Martin E Blackstein,
Manisha H Shah,
Jaap Verweij,
Grant McArthur,
Ian R Judson,
Michael C Heinrich,
Jeffrey A Morgan,
Jayesh Desai,
Christopher D Fletcher,
Suzanne George,
Carlo L Bello,
Xin Huang,
Charles M Baum,
Paolo G Casali
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: No effective therapeutic options for patients with unresectable imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumour are available. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, international trial to assess tolerability and anticancer efficacy of sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour who were resistant to or intolerant of previous treatment with imatinib.
Blinded sunitinib or placebo was given orally once daily at a 50-mg starting dose in 6-week cycles with 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off treatment. The primary endpoint was time to tumour progression. Intention-to-treat, modified intention-to-treat, and per-protocol analyses were done. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00075218.
312 patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive sunitinib (n=207) or placebo (n=105); the trial was unblinded early when a planned interim analysis showed significantly longer time to tumour progression with sunitinib. Median time to tumour progression was 27.3 weeks (95% CI 16.0-32.1) in patients receiving sunitinib and 6.4 weeks (4.4-10.0) in those on placebo (hazard ratio 0.33; p<0.0001). Therapy was reasonably well tolerated; the most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, diarrhoea, skin discolouration, and nausea.
We noted significant clinical benefit, including disease control and superior survival, with sunitinib compared with placebo in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure and discontinuation of imatinab. Tolerability was acceptable.
The Lancet 11/2006; 368(9544):1329-38. · 38.28 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In the multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), there is a need to coordinate the efforts of pathology, radiology, surgery and oncology. Surgery is the mainstay for resectable nonmetastatic GISTs, but virtually all GISTs are associated with a risk of metastasis. Imatinib 400 mg/day with or without surgery is the recommended first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic GIST; a higher dose may be considered in patients who progress, develop secondary resistance or present with specific genotypic characteristics. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant imatinib is not advised for resectable nonmetastatic GISTs. Neoadjuvant imatinib may be considered when surgery would result in significant morbidity or loss of organ function. Follow-up computed tomography imaging is recommended every three to six months for at least five years. Patients with metastatic disease should be continued on imatinib due to the high risk of recurrence on discontinuation of therapy. Treatment should be continued until there is progression or intolerable adverse effects. If dose escalation with imatinib fails, a clinical trial with novel agents alone or in combination may be considered. The present recommendations were developed at a surgical subcommittee meeting and a subsequent full Advisory Committee meeting held in Toronto, Ontario, in April 2005, under the sponsorship of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 04/2006; 20(3):157-63. · 1.21 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Purpose. Flavopiridol is a potent cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor that has preclinical activity in many tumours. This synthetic flavonoid was tested in a phase II nonrandomized, nonblinded multicentre clinical trial to determine its activity and toxicity in patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Methods. A total of 18 patients with histologically confirmed nonoperable soft tissue was treated with flavopiridol administered at a dose of 50 mg/m(2) IV over 1 hour daily x3 days every 3 weeks. Results. Eighteen patients were accrued to the study over a period of 6 months. No objective responses were noted in the seventeen evaluable patients. Eight patients (47%) exhibited stable disease after 2 cycles (median duration of 4.3 months (range 1.4-6.9 months). Kaplan-Meier estimates for 3- and 6-month progression-free survivial rates were 44 percent and 22 percent, respectively. The only grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (N = 2), nausea (N = 2), gastritis (N = 1), and fatigue (N = 1). Ninety-four percent of patients received >/= 90% of the planned dose intensity, during 55 treatment cycles. Conclusions. Flavopiridol was well tolerated at the dose and schedule used in this study, however, no objective treatment responses were seen and thus our results do not support further exploration of flavopiridol as a monotherapy at this dose and schedule in soft tissue sarcomas.
Sarcoma 02/2006; 2006:64374.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study had three aims: to establish the incidence of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) in a community treatment setting, to evaluate known factors--in particular younger age (< 40 years)--predictive for local recurrence, and to assess the impact of local recurrence on disease-specific survival (DSS).
A consecutive series of 1,540 women with node-negative breast cancer, diagnosed between the ages of 18-75 years, were prospectively accrued between September 1987 and September 1999. All had undergone a resection of the primary breast cancer with clear margins, an axillary lymph node dissection with a minimum of four sampled nodes, and breast-conserving surgery (of any type).
During the study follow-up period, 98 (6.4%) IBTRs and 117 (7.6%) deaths from or with breast cancer were observed. The median time to IBTR was 3.1 years and to death from or with disease was 4.3 years. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression model for IBTR with adjuvant therapy factors, independent risk factors included age < 40 years (relative risk (RR) = 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.00 - 3.58), presence of intraductal disease (RR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.15-2.85) and histological grade ('G2' or G3 versus G1: RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.87-2.94). In the multivariate Cox PH regression model for DSS with adjuvant therapy factors, independent risk factors included previous IBTR (RR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.41-4.72), tumor size (1-2 cm versus < 1 cm: RR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.05-3.64, > 2 cm versus < 1 cm: RR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.56-5.56), progesterone receptor status (negative or equivocal versus positive or unknown: RR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.36-3.39), lymphatic invasion (RR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.17-2.72), and histological grade ('G2' or G3 versus G1: RR = 8.59, 95% CI = 2.09-35.36). The effects of competing risks could be ignored.
The Cox PH analyses confirmed the importance of known risk factors for IBTR and DSS in a community treatment setting. This study also revealed that the early occurrence of an IBTR is associated with a relatively poor five-year survival rate.
Breast cancer research: BCR 01/2006; 8(4):R44. · 5.24 Impact Factor
-
Ronald L Burkes,
Frances A Shepherd, Martin E Blackstein,
Melvin E Goldberg,
Paul F Waters,
G Alexander Patterson,
Thomas Todd,
F Griffith Pearson,
Donald Jones,
Samina Farooq,
John McGlaughlin,
Robert J Ginsberg
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This is a phase II study to assess the role of induction chemotherapy in the management of stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We are now reporting the long-term follow-up of the Toronto phase II trial.
Sixty five patients with mediastinoscopy proven stage IIIA NSCLC received two cycles of preoperative MVP or VLB/P followed by thoracotomy followed by two further courses of chemotherapy.
The overall response rate was 67.7% with three complete and 41 partial responders. Forty seven patients went on to thoracotomy with 35 complete resections. Pathologically 4.6% of patients had no tumour remaining. There were three postop deaths as well as five chemotherapy related deaths. Of the 35 patients completely resected 19 have recurred including eight in brain. The median survival for the entire 65 patients is 18.6 months with a 1 year survival of 66%, 5 year survival of 29% and a 10 year survival of 22%.
The long-term survival of induction chemotherapy is maintained. The high incidence of brain recurrences warrants assessment of the role of prophylactic cranial radiation. The role of surgery for stage IIIA NSCLC following induction chemotherapy awaits further study.
Lung Cancer 02/2005; 47(1):103-9. · 3.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Investigation of the regulation of cell growth, differentiation and death by signalling pathways has led to a greater understanding of how alterations in these pathways play a critical role in the development of some cancers, and has opened new opportunities for their treatment. In the present review, results with the prototype drug of this class, imatinib (Gleevec, Glivec [formerly STI571]; Novartis, Switzerland), in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours are presented. The present review originated from a conference of the authors held in Montreal, Quebec in June 2003, under the sponsorship of Novartis.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 10/2004; 18 Suppl B:3B-8B. · 1.21 Impact Factor
-
Soha Riad,
Anthony M Griffin,
Boaz Liberman, Martin E Blackstein,
Charles N Catton,
Rita A Kandel,
Brian O'Sullivan,
Lawrence M White,
Robert S Bell,
Peter C Ferguson,
Jay S Wunder
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: For patients with soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity, the outcome is thought to be poor if lymph node metastasis develops. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of lymphatic involvement from soft tissue sarcoma on patient survival. Thirty-nine (3.7%) of 1066 patients who had surgery for soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity had lymph node metastases develop. Three (20%) of 15 patients with epithelioid sarcoma, four (19%) of 21 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, two (11.1%) of 18 patients with clear cell sarcoma, and two (11.1%) of 18 patients with angiosarcoma had lymphatic involvement. Thirty patients who had resection of involved lymph nodes had an estimated 5-year survival of 57%, whereas nine patients treated without surgery all died within 30 months. An estimated 4-year survival of 71% for patients with isolated lymph node metastases was significantly better than 21% for patients with synchronous systemic and lymph node involvement. There was no difference in outcome for patients with isolated lymphatic involvement compared with patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage III extremity sarcomas. These results suggest that long-term survival is possible after surgical resection of lymphatic metastases from soft tissue sarcoma. The American Joint Committee on Cancer should consider separating isolated nodal metastases from systemic involvement in patients with Stage IV sarcoma.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 10/2004; · 2.53 Impact Factor
-
Shelley B Bull,
Hilmi Ozcelik,
Dushanthi Pinnaduwage, Martin E Blackstein,
Donald A J Sutherland,
Kathleen I Pritchard,
Anjela T Tzontcheva,
Saul Sidlofsky,
Wedad M Hanna,
Ali H Qizilbash,
Mary E Tweeddale,
Sheldon Fine,
David R McCready,
Irene L Andrulis
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Increases in neu/erbB-2 have been implicated in breast cancer prognosis, but do not predict all recurrences. On the basis of evidence that p53 mutation is involved in the development of human neoplasia, we examined the prognostic value of p53 alterations in combination with neu/erbB-2 amplification.
A consecutive series of women were observed for recurrence and death (median follow-up of 85 months) and tumors from 543 individuals were analyzed for p53 mutation status and neu/erbB-2 amplification. Exons 4 through 10 of the p53 gene were analyzed by single-stranded conformational polymorphism and mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The association of p53 mutation status and neu/erbB-2 amplification with risk of recurrence and death was examined in survival analyses with traditional and histologic markers as prognostic factors.
p53 mutations occurred in 24.5% of the axillary node-negative breast carcinomas. Mutations were more frequent in carcinomas with neu/erbB-2 amplification: 38.9% compared with only 20.9% in those without neu/erbB-2 amplification. We found elevated risks of disease recurrence and overall mortality in patients with both p53 mutation and neu/erbB-2 amplification in their tumor compared with patients with neither or only one of the alterations. This increase persisted with adjustment for other prognostic factors (relative risk, 2.32; P =.002 for recurrence; relative risk, 2.22; P =.004 for death).
Evaluation of tumors for p53 mutations may be beneficial to identify women at higher risk of disease recurrence and death when the tumor has neu/erbB-2 amplification, but in the absence of neu/erbB-2 amplification, the presence of p53 mutation may not provide additional independent prognostic information.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 02/2004; 22(1):86-96. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Ronald L. Burkes,
Robert J. Ginsberg,
Frances A. Shepherd, Martin E. Blackstein,
Melvyn E. Goldberg,
Paul F. Waters,
G. Alexander Patterson,
Thomas Todd,
F. Griffith Pearson,
Joel D. Cooper,
Donald Jones,
Gina Lockwood
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The 5-year survival rates for patients undergoing a potentially curative surgical resection for pre-operatively identified stage 3A N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) vary from 2–13%. In an attempt to improve the curative potential of surgery, 39 patients with mediastinoscopy stage 3A unresectable N2 NSCLC received induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of mitomycin-C, vindesine and cisplatin (MVP). Responding patients underwent thoracotomy for resection and 2 further courses of MVP. The overall response rate was 64% () with 3 complete and 22 partial responses. 22 patients were resected which included a radical mediastinal node dissection. 18 resections were complete and 4 were incomplete. Pathologically 3 patients (7.7%) had no tumor remaining. There were 2 post-op deaths secondary to a BP fistula. In addition to GI and neurologic side effects, toxicity of chemotherapy included mitomycin pulmonary toxicity in 2 patients and 4 septic deaths. 28 patients have died, 20 with recurrent or progressive disease. Of the 18 patients completely resected, 8 have recurred with a median time to recurrence of 20.6 months. Sites of recurrence include 2 loco-regional, 5 distant (2 in brain) and 1 both. Median survival of the entire 39 patients is 18.6 months with a 3-year survival of 26%. The median survival for those patients completely resected is 29.7 months with a 3-year survival of 40%. These findings suggest that MVP is an effective but toxic chemotherapeutic regimen for limited NSCLC, and although the median survival appears to be prolonged, the role of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery in stage IIIA N2 NSCLC requires a Phase III randomized trial comparing it to other treatment modalities.
Lung Cancer.
