-
M Brignole,
G L Botto,
L Mont,
D Oddone,
S Iacopino,
G De Marchi,
M Campoli,
V Sebastiani,
A Vincenti,
D Garcia Medina,
J Osca Asensi,
A Mocini,
N Grovale,
T De Santo, C Menozzi
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the 2-year clinical improvement after 'Ablate and Pace' therapy and to identify the variables able to influence the efficacy of this therapy in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Design Prospective multicentre observational study. Setting Cardiology departments of 19 general hospitals in Italy, Spain and Greece.
171 patients with drug-refractory severely symptomatic permanent AF considered for AV junction ablation. Interventions Patients underwent AV junction ablation, received a right ventricular (RV) pacing or echo-guided cardiac resynchronisation (CRT) pacing and were followed-up to 24 months. Main outcome measures Non-responders to Ablate and Pace therapy were defined those patients who, during the follow-up period had clinical failure (defined as death or hospitalisation due to heart failure, or worsening heart failure) or showed no improvement in their clinical condition.
Responders were 63% of RV-paced patients and 83% of CRT-paced patients. Another 27% showed no clinical improvement (7%) or worsened (20%) (non-responders group). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, CRT mode and echo-optimised CRT were the only independent protective factors against non-response (HR=0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.58, p=0.001 and HR=0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.77, p=0.018 respectively). On comparing freedom from non-response, a trend in favour of echo-optimised CRT versus simultaneous biventricular pacing (p=0.077) was seen.
In patients affected by severely symptomatic permanent AF, Ablate and Pace therapy yielded a clinical benefit in 63% of RV-paced patients and 83% of CRT-paced patients. CRT pacing and echo-optimised CRT were the only independent predictor of clinical benefit.
Heart (British Cardiac Society) 11/2011; 98(4):297-302. · 4.22 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To develop, in patients referred for syncope to an emergency department (ED), a diagnostic score to identify those patients likely to have a cardiac cause.
Prospective cohort study.
ED of 14 general hospitals.
516 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope.
Subjects underwent a diagnostic evaluation on adherence to Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. The clinical features of syncope were analysed using a standard 52-item form. In a validation cohort of 260 patients the predictive value of symptoms/signs was evaluated, a point score was developed and then validated in a cohort of 256 other patients. Main outcome measurements: Diagnosis of cardiac syncope, mortality.
Abnormal ECG and/or heart disease, palpitations before syncope, syncope during effort or in supine position, absence of autonomic prodromes and absence of predisposing and/or precipitating factors were found to be predictors of cardiac syncope. To each variable a score from +4 to -1 was assigned to the magnitude of regression coefficient. A score >or=3 identified cardiac syncope with a sensitivity of 95%/92% and a specificity of 61%/69% in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. During follow-up (mean (SD) 614 (73) days) patients with score >or=3 had a higher total mortality than patients with a score <3 both in the derivation (17% vs 3%; p<0.001) and in the validation cohort (21% vs 2%; p<0.001).
A simple score derived from clinical history can be usefully employed for the triage and management of patients with syncope in an ED.
Heart (British Cardiac Society) 12/2008; 94(12):1620-6. · 4.22 Impact Factor
-
11/2007: pages 27 - 28; , ISBN: 9780470995013
-
11/2007: pages 41 - 43; , ISBN: 9780470995013
-
11/2007: pages 25 - 26; , ISBN: 9780470995013
-
12/2005: pages 675-679;
-
M Brignole,
M Gammage,
E Puggioni,
P Alboni,
A Raviele,
R Sutton,
P Vardas,
M G Bongiorni,
L Bergfeldt, C Menozzi,
G Musso
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Left ventricular (LV) and biventricular (BiV) pacing are potentially superior to right ventricular (RV) apical pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation and pacing for permanent atrial fibrillation.
Prospective randomized, single-blind, 3-month crossover comparison between RV and LV pacing (phase 1) and between RV and BiV pacing (phase 2) performed in 56 patients (70+/-8 years, 34 males) affected by severely symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation, uncontrolled ventricular rate, or heart failure. Primary endpoints were quality of life and exercise capacity. Compared with RV pacing, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ) score improved by 2 and 10% with LV and BiV pacing, respectively, the effort dyspnoea item of the Specific Symptom Scale (SSS) changed by 0 and 2%, the Karolinska score by 6 and 14% (P<0.05 for BiV), the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class by 5 and 11% (P<0.05 for BiV), the 6-min walked distance by 12 (+4%) and 4 m (+1%), and the ejection fraction by 5 and 5% (P<0.05 for both). BiV pacing but not LV pacing was slightly better than RV pacing in the subgroup of patients with preserved systolic function and absence of native left bundle branch block. Compared with pre-ablation measures, the Minnesota LHFQ score improved by 37, 39, and 49% during RV, LV, and BiV pacing, respectively, the effort dyspnoea item of the SSS by 25, 25, and 39%, the Karolinska score by 39, 42, and 54%, the NYHA class by 21, 25, and 30%, the 6-min walking distance by 35 (12%), 47 (16%), and 51 m (19%) and the ejection fraction by 5, 10, and 10% (all differences P<0.05).
Rhythm regularization achieved with AV-junction ablation improved quality of life and exercise capacity with all modes of pacing. LV and BiV pacing provided modest or no additional favourable effect compared with RV pacing.
European Heart Journal 04/2005; 26(7):712-22. · 10.48 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A minority of patients with unexplained syncope has an increased susceptibility to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) injection. In these 'hypersensitive' patients, owing to its powerful cardiac and hypotensive effects, endogenous adenosine released under physiological and pathological conditions could trigger bradycardia and/or hypotension and cause syncope. This hypothesis still needs to be proven. However, there is some evidence that the ATP test identifies a group of patients with otherwise unexplained syncope with definite clinical features, absence of structural heart disease and benign prognosis. The mechanism of syncope is heterogeneous; indeed, in cases of electrocardiographic documentation of spontaneous syncope, either a long ventricular pause (mainly due to paroxysmal atrioventricular (AV) block) or no rhythm variations or even tachycardia were documented. ATP-positive patients have clinical features and mechanisms of syncope which are different from tilt-positive patients. Owing to its low positive predictive value, the ATP test is of little value in selecting treatment. A favourable outcome suggests a strategy of postponing treatment, in particular pacemaker therapy, until a definite diagnosis can be made by documenting a spontaneous syncopal relapse.
Europace 11/2003; 5(4):425-8. · 1.98 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare clinical, electrophysiological characteristics and transcatheter ablation results between two groups of patients, one with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and the other with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
The study population consisted of 94 consecutive patients who underwent endocavitary electrophysiological study and radiofrequency (RF) ablation: 46 patients had AVRT due to an accessory pathway with only retrograde conduction while 48 patients had AVNRT.
In relation to general and clinical characteristics, differences between the two groups emerged regarding the age of symptom onset (25+/-16 vs 37+/-17 years, p=0.001), the prevalence of heart disease (8 vs 31%, p=0.001) and the correct diagnosis on surface ECG (50 vs 79%, p=0.001). Clinical presentation was quite similar apart from a higher prevalence of fatigue and sweating in the AVNRT group. Transcatheter RF ablation therapy results were similar.
Patients with AVRT have a lower mean age at arrhythmia symptom onset compared with those with AVNRT and have fewer associated cardiac abnormalities. Clinical presentation is quite similar as well as their outcome after ablation. A correct diagnosis by standard ECG is more frequent in AVNRT.
Europace 08/2003; 5(3):225-9. · 1.98 Impact Factor
-
M Disertori,
M Brignole, C Menozzi,
A Raviele,
P Rizzon,
M Santini,
A Proclemer,
C Tomasi,
A Rossillo,
F Taddei,
A Scivales,
R Migliorini,
T De Santo
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the incidence and the strategy of management of syncope admitted urgently to a general hospital.
The management of patients with syncope is not standardized.
The study was a prospective observational registry from a sample of 28 general hospitals in Italy and enroled all consecutive patients referred to their emergency rooms from November 5th 2001 to December 7th 2001 who were affected by transient loss of consciousness as the principal symptom.
The incidence of syncope was 0.95% (996 of 105,173 patients attending). Forty-six percent were hospitalized, mostly in the Department of Internal Medicine. The mean in-hospital stay was 8.1+/-5.9 days. A mean of 3.48 tests was performed per patient. A definite diagnosis was made in 80% of cases, neurally-mediated syncope being the most frequent. The findings of each of the 28 hospitals participating in the survey were separately evaluated. We observed great inter-hospital and inter-department heterogeneity regarding the incidence of emergency admission, in-hospital pathways, most of the examinations performed and the final assigned diagnosis. For example, the execution of carotid sinus massage ranged from 0% in one hospital to 58% in another (median 12.5%); tilt testing ranged from 0 to 50% (median 5.8%); the final diagnosis of neurally-mediated syncope ranged from 10 to 78.6% (median 43.3%).
Great inter-hospital and inter-department heterogeneity in the incidence and management of syncope was observed in general hospitals. As a consequence, we were unable to describe a uniform strategy for the management of syncope in everyday practice.
Europace 08/2003; 5(3):283-91. · 1.98 Impact Factor
-
M Brignole,
M Disertori, C Menozzi,
A Raviele,
P Alboni,
M V Pitzalis,
P Delise,
E Puggioni,
M Del Greco,
V Malavasi,
M Lunati,
M Pepe,
D Fabrizi
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We tested the hypothesis that management of patients with syncope admitted urgently to a general hospital may be influenced by the presence of an in-hospital structured syncope unit.
The management of syncope is not standardized. Methods We compared six hospitals equipped with a syncope unit organized inside the department of cardiology with six matched hospitals without such facilities. The study enroled all consecutive patients referred to the emergency room from 5 November 2001 to 7 December 2001 who were affected by transient loss of consciousness as their principal symptom.
There were 279 patients in the syncope unit hospitals and 274 in the control hospitals. In the study group, 30 (11%) patients were referred to the syncope unit for evaluation. In the study group, 12% fewer patients were hospitalized (43 vs 49%, not significant) and 8% fewer tests were performed (3.3+/-2.2 vs 3.6+/-2.2 per patient, not significant). In particular, the study group patients underwent fewer basic laboratory tests (75 vs 86%, P=0.002), fewer brain-imaging examinations (17 vs 24%, P=0.05), fewer echocardiograms (11 vs 16%, P=0.04), more carotid sinus massage (13 vs 8%, P=0.03) and more tilt testing (8 vs 1%, P=0.000). In the study group, there was a +56% rate of final diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope (56 vs 36%, P=0.000).
Although only a minority of patients admitted as an emergency are referred to the syncope unit, overall management is substantially affected. It is speculated that the use of a standardized approach, such as that typically adopted in the syncope unit, is able to influence overall practice in the hospital.
Europace 08/2003; 5(3):293-8. · 1.98 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The finding of bundle branch block in patients with syncope suggests that paroxysmal AV block may be the cause of syncope, even though its prevalence is unknown.
We evaluated 55 consecutive patients with syncope and bundle branch block (mean age 75 +/- 8 years; median of two syncopal episodes per patient) referred to three Syncope Units. The hierarchy and appropriateness of diagnostic tests and the definitions of the final diagnoses followed standardized predefined criteria.
Cardiac syncope was diagnosed in 25 patients (45%): AV block in 20, sick sinus syndrome in 2, sustained ventricular tachycardia in 1, aortic stenosis in 2. Neurally mediated syncope was diagnosed in 22 (40%): carotid sinus syndrome in 5, tilt-induced syncope in 15, adenosine-sensitive syncope in 2. Syncope remained unexplained in 8 (15%).
Less than half of the patients with bundle branch block have a final diagnosis of cardiac syncope; in these patients, paroxysmal AV block is the most frequent but not the only mechanism supposed.
Europace 11/2002; 4(4):357-60. · 1.98 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The appropriate diagnostic work-up of patients with syncope is not well defined. We applied the guidelines of Italian 'Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri' to a group of consecutive patients with syncope referred to three Syncope Units. The aim of the study was to evaluate the applicability of those guidelines in the 'real world' and their impact on the use of the tests.
We evaluated 308 consecutive patients with syncope (mean age 61 +/- 20 years; median of three syncopal episodes per patient). The hierarchy and appropriateness of diagnostic tests and the definitions of the final diagnosis followed standardized predefined criteria. In brief, all patients underwent initial evaluation consisting of history, physical examination, supine and upright blood pressure measurement and standard electrocardiogram (ECG) (only in patients > 45 years or with history of heart disease). Any subsequent investigations were based on the findings of the initial evaluation. Priority was given to cardiological tests (prolonged ECG monitoring, exercise test, electrophysiological study), or to neurally mediated tests (carotid sinus massage, tilt test, ATP test), or to neuro-psychiatric tests, as appropriate.
The initial evaluation alone was diagnostic in 72 patients (23%). One further test was necessary for diagnosis in 65 patients (21%), > or = 2 tests in 64 (21%) and > or = 3 tests in 50 (16%). The diagnostic yield was 10% for ECG, 3% for echocardiogram, 16% for Holter, 5% for exercise test, 27% for electrophysiological study, 57% for carotid sinus massage, 52% for tilt testing and 15% for ATP test. At the end of the work-up the mechanism of syncope remained unexplained in 57 patients (18%).
When standardized criteria based on the appropriateness of indications are used, few simple tests are usually needed for diagnosis of syncope.
Europace 10/2002; 4(4):351-5. · 1.98 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Permanent atrial fibrillation develops in many patients after ablation and pacing therapy. We compared a strategy that initially allowed patients to remain in atrial fibrillation with a strategy that initially attempted to restore and maintain sinus rhythm.
In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, 68 patients affected by severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were assigned, after successful atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing treatment, to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone, propafenone, flecainide or sotalol and were compared with 69 patients assigned, after successful AV junction ablation and pacing treatment, to no antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The patients were followed-up for 12 to 24 months (mean 16+/-4). The drug arm patients had a 57% reduction in the risk of developing permanent atrial fibrillation (21% vs 37%, P=0.02). Evaluation after 12 months revealed similar quality of life scores and echocardiographic parameters in the two groups, but the drug arm patients had more episodes of heart failure and hospitalizations (P=0.05). The outcome was similar between the 40 patients who developed permanent atrial fibrillation and the 97 who did not.
Conventional antiarrhythmic therapy reduces the risk of development of permanent atrial fibrillation after ablation and pacing therapy. The present data do not support the concept that the development of permanent atrial fibrillation is related to an adverse outcome when a perfect control of heart rate is obtained by ablation and pacing.
European Heart Journal 07/2002; 23(11):892-900. · 10.48 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Though vasovagal syncope probably does not directly cause death, it is often associated with severe trauma and, when recurrent, significantly impairs the patient's quality of life. While drug therapy for vasovagal syncope is still controversial, recently two randomized studies revealed the efficacy of dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in decreasing recurrences in very symptomatic patients. However, since both studies were not placebo-controlled, the benefits observed might have been due to the placebo effect of the pacemaker. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the vasovagal Syncope and pacing (Synpace) trial, a multicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, is to ascertain whether, in patients suffering from recurrent vasovagal syncope, the implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with rate drop response algorithm programmed to ON, will reduce syncope relapses compared with the implantation of a pacemaker programmed to OFF. Moreover, in order to evaluate the role of the haemodynamic response during tilt-induced syncope in identifying those patients who will benefit most from pacemaker implantation, enrolled patients will be divided into two groups on the basis of their haemodynamic behaviour during tilt-induced syncope: group 1, asystolic response (development of asystole >3 s), and group 2, mixed response (development of bradycardia <60 bpm, without asystole >3 s). The head-up tilt testing protocol will consist of 20 min at 60 degrees without drug potentiation, followed by 15 min at the same inclination after 400 microg of sublingual nitroglycerin. Results from the two groups will be analysed both separately and globally. The primary clinical endpoint of the study will be syncope. INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: To be enrolled, patients will have to meet the following criteria: at least six syncopal episodes in the patient's lifetime; positive head-up tilt testing with asystolic or mixed response; at least one syncope recurrence following a positive head-up tilt test. The following constitute exclusion criteria: non-vasovagal syncope; other indications for pacing. SAMPLE SIZE: We hypothesize a risk of syncope recurrence of 70% after one year, and we estimate that--owing to the placebo effect alone--pacemaker will produce a 20% decrease in risk, which corresponds to a 50% risk of recurrence after one year, in those patients randomized to 'pacemaker OFF'. We calculate conservatively a risk decrease of 60% in patients with 'pacemaker ON'. This implies a 10% incidence of syncope recurrence after one year, vs 50% in patients with 'pacemaker OFF'. Fifty patients will need to be enrolled in the study: 25 patients for each group.
Europace 11/2001; 3(4):336-41. · 1.98 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In patients with syncope and bundle branch block (BBB), syncope is suspected to be attributable to a paroxysmal atrioventricular (AV) block, but little is known of its mechanism when electrophysiological study is negative.
We applied an implantable loop recorder in 52 patients with BBB and negative conventional workup. During a follow-up of 3 to 15 months, syncope recurred in 22 patients (42%), the event being documented in 19 patients after a median of 48 days. The most frequent finding, recorded in 17 patients, was one or more prolonged asystolic pause mainly attributable to AV block; the remaining 2 patients had normal sinus rhythm or sinus tachycardia. The onset of the bradycardic episodes was always sudden but was sometimes preceded by ventricular premature beats. The median duration of the arrhythmic event was 47 seconds. An additional 3 patients developed nonsyncopal persistent III-degree AV block, and 2 patients had presyncope attributable to AV block with asystole. No patients suffered injury attributable to syncopal relapse.
In patients with BBB and negative electrophysiological study, most syncopal recurrences have a homogeneous mechanism that is characterized by prolonged asystolic pauses, mainly attributable to sudden-onset paroxysmal AV block.
Circulation 11/2001; 104(17):2045-50. · 14.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Because of its episodic behavior, the correlation of spontaneous syncope with an abnormal finding can be considered a reference standard.
We inserted an implantable loop recorder in 111 patients with syncope, absence of significant structural heart disease, and a normal ECG; tilt-testing was negative in 82 (isolated syncope) and positive in 29 (tilt-positive). The patients had had >/=3 episodes of syncope in the previous 2 years and were followed up for 3 to 15 months. Results were similar in the isolated syncope group and the tilt-positive group: syncope recurred in 28 (34%) and 10 patients (34%), respectively, and electrocardiographic correlation was found in 24 (23%) and 8 (28%) patients, respectively. The most frequent finding, which was recorded in 46% and 62% of patients, respectively, was one or more prolonged asystolic pauses, mainly due to sinus arrest, preceded for a few minutes by progressive bradycardia or progressive tachycardia-bradycardia. Bradycardia without pauses was observed in 8% and 12% of cases, respectively. The remaining patients had normal sinus rhythm or sinus tachycardia, except for one, who had ectopic atrial tachycardia. In the tilt-positive group, an asystolic syncope was also recorded when the type of response to tilt-testing was vasodepressor or mixed. Presyncopal episodes were never characterized by asystolic pauses; normal sinus rhythm was the most frequent finding.
Homogeneous findings were observed during syncope. In most patients, the likely cause was neurally-mediated, and the most frequent mechanism was a bradycardic reflex. In the other cases, a normal sinus rhythm was frequently recorded. Presyncope was not an accurate surrogate for syncope in establishing a diagnosis.
Circulation 10/2001; 104(11):1261-7. · 14.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is current opinion that concealed and manifest accessory pathways (APs) are indistinguishable with respect to their location and contribution to orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of two groups of patients.
Between January 1999 and June 2000, 42 consecutive patients underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia attributable to a concealed AP. Their clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were compared with a group of 48 consecutive patients with manifest AP and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.
There were no differences regarding gender, the prevalence of heart disease and the age of onset of symptomatic tachycardias between the two groups. Compared to those with a manifest AP, the patients presenting with a tachyarrhythmia due to a concealed AP were older (48 +/- 15 vs 40 +/- 16 years, p < 0.05) and had a longer history of tachyarrhythmias (22 +/- 16 vs 13 +/- 13 years, p < 0.05). Atrial fibrillation was more frequent in patients with a manifest AP than in patients with a concealed AP (50 vs 9.5% respectively, p = 0.02). Atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia was a cause of more hospitalizations (76 vs 35%, p = 0.01) and episodes of pre-syncope (47 vs 22%, p < 0.05) in the group of patients with a concealed AP. The anatomical site of concealed and manifest APs was significantly different: concealed APs were more frequently localized in the left side (93% left, 7% right), while manifest APs were seen in the left side in 64% of cases, in the right side in 29% and in the posteroseptal left + right region in 7% of cases. The retrograde electrophysiological properties and the inducibility of other types of reentrant arrhythmias were similar. Catheter ablation was similarly successful regardless of whether the AP was concealed or manifest, the rates of success being 91 and 88% respectively at the first attempt and with a similar number of energy applications (7 +/- 7 vs 10 +/- 9, p = NS). At a second attempt, the procedure was successful in 100 and 98% of cases respectively. Periprocedural complications occurred in 5% of patients with a concealed (1 ventricular fibrillation, 1 cerebral transient ischemic attack) and in 8% of patients with a manifest AP (2 pericardial effusion, 1 transient atrioventricular block, 1 anginal attack with spontaneous recovery) (p = NS). Complications occurred only for left-sided APs and were independent of the approach (transseptal or retrograde). Relapse of AP conduction was more frequent in the group of patients with a manifest than in those with a concealed AP (12 vs 5%), though not significantly. There were no late complications.
Those patients presenting with a tachyarrhythmia due to a concealed AP, compared to those with a manifest AP, were older and had a longer history of tachyarrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation was more frequent in patients with manifest AP. Atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia episodes were longer-lasting and caused more hospitalizations and more frequently pre-syncope in the group of patients with a concealed AP. Almost all concealed APs were localized in the left side. The retrograde electrophysiological properties were similar. The results of radiofrequency catheter ablation were comparable in both groups.
Italian heart journal. Supplement: official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology 08/2001; 2(8):888-93.
-
Heart (British Cardiac Society) 07/2001; 85(6):610-2. · 4.22 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We sought to establish what historical findings are predictive of the cause of syncope.
The clinical features of the various types of syncope have not been systematically investigated.
Three hundred forty-one patients with syncope were prospectively evaluated. Each patient was interviewed using a standard questionnaire. A cause of syncope was assigned using standardized diagnostic criteria.
A cardiac cause of syncope was established in 23% of the patients, a neurally mediated cause in 58% and a neurologic or psychiatric cause in 1%, and in the remaining 18%, the cause of syncope remained unexplained. In a preliminary analysis including age, gender and the presence of suspected or certain heart disease after the initial evaluation, only heart disease was an independent predictor of a cardiac cause of syncope (odds ratio 16, p = 0.00001), with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 45%. In contrast, the absence of heart disease allowed us to exclude a cardiac cause of syncope in 97% of the patients. In patients with certain or suspected heart disease, the most specific predictors of a cardiac cause were syncope in the supine position or during effort, blurred vision and convulsive syncope. Significant and specific predictors of a neurally mediated cause were time between the first and last syncopal episode >4 years, abdominal discomfort before the loss of consciousness and nausea and diaphoresis during the recovery phase. In the patients without heart disease, palpitation was the only significant predictor of a cardiac cause.
The presence of suspected or certain heart disease after the initial evaluation is a strong predictor of a cardiac cause of syncope. A few historical findings are useful to predict cardiac and neurally mediated syncope in patients with and without heart disease.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 06/2001; 37(7):1921-8. · 14.16 Impact Factor
