Publications (6)41.3 Total impact
-
Article: Defining high-risk patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison among different scoring systems and clinical definitions.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Identification of high-risk patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) is of the utmost importance for adequate patient stratification and evaluation of additive treatments. However, there is no consensus on the optimal definition of high-risk patients. We therefore compared 5 scoring systems in the assessment of the risk of 30-day mortality in 3214 patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clinical scores showed a large variability in risk stratifying patients. Identification of high-risk patients ranged from 15% (PAMI score ≥ 9) to 66% (McNamara definition). McNamara, Antoniucci and Brodie definitions had the best sensitivity (0.87-0.88 and 95% confidence intervals (CI) ranging from 0.82-0.93) while PAMI ≥ 9 had the best specificity (0.87 with 95% CI of 0.86-0.88), while its sensitivity was quite low (0.42). In a sample size simulation of a trial aimed at demonstrating a 33% difference in 30-day mortality between two hypothetical treatments, the number of STEMI patients needed to be screened varied from 4712 for the Brodie definition to 9038 for the PAMI ≥ 9 score. There is a large variability in risk stratification, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values among different scoring systems. These considerations should be taken into account when designing randomised trials.International journal of cardiology 01/2011; 157(2):207-11. · 7.08 Impact Factor -
Article: Prognostic implications of ST-segment elevation resolution in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with primary or facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Scant data are available on the relation between ST-segment elevation (STE) resolution and 30-day mortality in patients with STE acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary, real world, clinical practice. Furthermore, whether the prognostic value of STE resolution is influenced by the patient clinical risk profile or postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow has never been investigated. Lombardima was an observational registry implemented in Lombardy, a Northern Italian region. The clinical characteristics, electorcardiographic parameters, and procedural data were prospectively entered into a Web-based database. In the present study, we enrolled 3,403 patients. STE resolution occurred in 2,452 patients (group 1) and did not in 951 patients (group 2). The mortality rate was 2.4% in group 1 and 11.3% in group 2 (p <0.001). After stratifying patients according to their TIMI risk index, we observed that STE resolution was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality across all spectrum of clinical risk. Furthermore, in patients with TIMI 3 flow, STE resolution remained an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (p <0.0001). In conclusion, STE resolution was a strong and independent predictor of 30-day mortality in patients with STE acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention across all spectrum of clinical risk.The American journal of cardiology 03/2010; 105(5):605-10. · 3.58 Impact Factor -
Article: Impact of acute coronary syndromes on two-year clinical outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this study we investigated the impact of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) on clinical outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents (DESs). In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study we enrolled 1,101 patients with ULMCA stenosis treated with DESs. Six hundred eleven patients presented with ACS and 490 had stable coronary artery disease. ACS was defined as the presence of unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). During 2-year follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratio of cardiac mortality and MI of patients with ACS versus stable patients was 2.42 (95% confidence interval 1.37 to 4.28, p = 0.002). We observed a stepwise risk increase, namely patients with stable coronary disease had the lowest risk, patients with unstable angina an intermediate risk, and patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI the highest risk. The increased risk of cardiac mortality and MI of patients with ACS was concentrated in the first year after DES implantation. In conclusion, patients with ULMCA stenosis and ACS treated with DESs have an increased risk of cardiac mortality and MI during the first year after the intervention compared to stable patients.The American journal of cardiology 01/2010; 105(2):174-8. · 3.58 Impact Factor -
Article: A randomised study comparing the antiplatelet and antiinflammatory effect of clopidogrel 150 mg/day versus 75 mg/day in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction and poor responsiveness to clopidogrel: results from the DOUBLE study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The antiplatelet effect of standard or increased clopidogrel doses in patients with ST- segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) has never been studied. In this study we compared the antiplatelet effect of a 75 mg daily maintenance dose of clopidogrel with 150 mg in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Fifty-four patients with STEMI undergoing PCI were randomly allocated to receive either 75 mg/day clopidogrel (group 1) or 150 mg/day (group 2) for 1 month. Platelet function, measured by 5 different assays, was determined at 3 time points: 38+/-8 hours after the procedure, 1 week and 1 month after randomization. In group 1, mean +/- SD platelet reactivity index (PRI) measured with the VASP assay was 57.7+/-15.7% and 46.9+/-15.7% at 1 week and 1 month, respectively, compared to 38.8+/-15.7% and 34.9+/-12.6% in group 2 (p=0.0001). Same results were observed for light transmittance aggregometry, whole blood aggregometry and VerifyNow, but not for thromboelastometry. In contrast to what may be expected, the 75 mg daily maintenance dose took longer than 1-week to provide the full clopidogrel antiplatelet effect. Furthermore, patients in group 2 had a nearly 50% reduction in C-reactive protein levels both at 1 week and 1 month. In patients with STEMI and poor responsiveness to clopidogrel a 150 mg daily maintenance dose of clopidogrel is associated with a significant reduction of platelet aggregation and a trend towards reduced inflammation.Thrombosis Research 08/2009; 125(4):309-14. · 2.44 Impact Factor -
Article: Ostial and midshaft lesions vs. bifurcation lesions in 1111 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents: results of the survey from the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this study, we compared the cumulative risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis with those of patients with ostial and midshaft lesions treated with drug-eluting stent (DES). The survey promoted by the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology on ULMCA stenosis was an observational study involving 19 high-volume Italian centres. We enrolled 1111 patients with ULMCA stenosis treated with DES. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Three hundred and thirty-four patients had ostial or midshaft lesions (group 1) and 777 bifurcations (group 2). The adjusted hazards ratio of the risk of 2 year MACE of patients in group 2 vs. patients in group 1 was 1.50 (P = 0.024). However, we observed that there was a significant difference between patients with bifurcations treated with two stents and those in group 1 (P = 0.001), but not between patients with bifurcations treated with one stent and those in group 1 (P = 0.38). Patients with bifurcations have a worse outcome than patients with ostial and midshaft lesions. However, the technique used to treat bifurcations has a significant impact on clinical outcomes.European Heart Journal 07/2009; 30(17):2087-94. · 10.48 Impact Factor -
Article: Temporal pattern of ischemic events in relation to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a temporal pattern of ischemic events in relation to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Identifying which periods during follow-up of patients with ULMCA stenosis treated with PCI are associated with higher risk of clinical events might help to improve therapeutic strategies. We analyzed data from 15 centers involved in an observational study conducted by the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology on patients with ULMCA stenosis treated with PCI. Eight hundred ninety-four patients were enrolled. At 30-day follow-up, the rate of cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) was 5.4%. In patients still taking dual antiplatelet therapy, the adjusted incidence rate ratio/10,000 patient-days of the combination of cardiac mortality and MI in the 31- to 180-day interval compared with the 181- to 360-day interval after PCI was 3.64 (p = 0.035). This risk was particularly high in patients with acute coronary syndromes. After stopping clopidogrel, the adjusted incidence rate ratio of cardiac mortality and MI in the 0- to 90-day interval compared with the 91- to 180-day interval was 4.20 (p = 0.009). In patients with ULMCA stenosis taking dual antiplatelet therapy there is an increased hazard of cardiac mortality and MI between 31 and 180 days compared with 181 to 360 days. Furthermore, there is an increased hazard of cardiac mortality and MI in the first 90 days after stopping clopidogrel.Journal of the American College of Cardiology 05/2009; 53(14):1176-81. · 14.16 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
Institutions
-
2010
-
University of Bologna
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
-
