Are you Elizabeth Stewart?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)3.61 Total impact

  • Article: Impact of different levels of weight loss on blood pressure in overweight and obese women.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study sought to determine the impact of different levels of weight loss on blood pressure in overweight/obese women. One hundred fifty-nine overweight/obese women (age 48.7 +/- 9.7, weight 101.3 +/- 18.7 kg, BMI 37.3 +/- 6.6 kg/m(2)) completed a six-month clinical weight loss program that included weekly nutrition, behavior, and exercise instruction. Participants consumed a very-low-energy diet (VLED) for 12 weeks. VLED was followed by four weeks of gradual reintroduction to solid foods. At week 16, participants received a diet to maintain weight or slightly reduce weight (<0.5 lb/week) which they followed for the duration of the study. All lab and blood pressure assessments were performed at baseline and six months. Three groups were formed according to the proportion of weight loss after six months; Group 1 had < 10% (n = 19), Group 2 had 10%-20% (n = 64), and Group 3 had >20% (n = 76) weight loss. Differences in systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) were found in dose response fashion for weight loss at six months with 125 +/- 17 (<10%), 119 +/- 13 (10%-20%), and 117 +/- 15 (>20%; p = 0.005). Differences in diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) were also found in dose response fashion with 81 +/- 9 (<10%), 77 +/- 9 (10%-20%), and 75 +/- 9 (20%; p = 0.003). These data indicate that increasing weight loss beyond 10% of initial body weight may provide added improvements in blood pressure compared to less than 10% weight loss in overweight or obese women.
    Disease Management 04/2007; 10(2):83-90. · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Comparison of a low carbohydrate and low fat diet for weight maintenance in overweight or obese adults enrolled in a clinical weight management program.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent evidence suggests that a low carbohydrate (LC) diet may be equally or more effective for short-term weight loss than a traditional low fat (LF) diet; however, less is known about how they compare for weight maintenance. The purpose of this study was to compare body weight (BW) for participants in a clinical weight management program, consuming a LC or LF weight maintenance diet for 6 months following weight loss. Fifty-five (29 low carbohydrate diet; 26 low fat diet) overweight/obese middle-aged adults completed a 9 month weight management program that included instruction for behavior, physical activity (PA), and nutrition. For 3 months all participants consumed an identical liquid diet (2177 kJ/day) followed by 1 month of re-feeding with solid foods either low in carbohydrate or low in fat. For the remaining 5 months, participants were prescribed a meal plan low in dietary carbohydrate (~20%) or fat (~30%). BW and carbohydrate or fat grams were collected at each group meeting. Energy and macronutrient intake were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. The LC group increased BW from 89.2 +/- 14.4 kg at 3 months to 89.3 +/- 16.1 kg at 9 months (P = 0.84). The LF group decreased BW from 86.3 +/- 12.0 kg at 3 months to 86.0 +/- 14.0 kg at 9 months (P = 0.96). BW was not different between groups during weight maintenance (P = 0.87). Fifty-five percent (16/29) and 50% (13/26) of participants for the LC and LF groups, respectively, continued to decrease their body weight during weight maintenance. Following a 3 month liquid diet, the LC and LF diet groups were equally effective for BW maintenance over 6 months; however, there was significant variation in weight change within each group.
    Nutrition Journal 02/2007; 6:36. · 2.48 Impact Factor
  • Article: Comparison of a low carbohydrate and low fat diet for weight maintenance in overweight or obese adults enrolled in a clinical weight management program
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests that a low carbohydrate (LC) diet may be equally or more effective for short-term weight loss than a traditional low fat (LF) diet; however, less is known about how they compare for weight maintenance. The purpose of this study was to compare body weight (BW) for participants in a clinical weight management program, consuming a LC or LF weight maintenance diet for 6 months following weight loss. Methods Fifty-five (29 low carbohydrate diet; 26 low fat diet) overweight/obese middle-aged adults completed a 9 month weight management program that included instruction for behavior, physical activity (PA), and nutrition. For 3 months all participants consumed an identical liquid diet (2177 kJ/day) followed by 1 month of re-feeding with solid foods either low in carbohydrate or low in fat. For the remaining 5 months, participants were prescribed a meal plan low in dietary carbohydrate (~20%) or fat (~30%). BW and carbohydrate or fat grams were collected at each group meeting. Energy and macronutrient intake were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. Results The LC group increased BW from 89.2 ± 14.4 kg at 3 months to 89.3 ± 16.1 kg at 9 months ( P = 0.84). The LF group decreased BW from 86.3 ± 12.0 kg at 3 months to 86.0 ± 14.0 kg at 9 months ( P = 0.96). BW was not different between groups during weight maintenance ( P = 0.87). Fifty-five percent (16/29) and 50% (13/26) of participants for the LC and LF groups, respectively, continued to decrease their body weight during weight maintenance. Conclusion Following a 3 month liquid diet, the LC and LF diet groups were equally effective for BW maintenance over 6 months; however, there was significant variation in weight change within each group.
    Nutrition Journal. 01/2007;