-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although it is well known that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a primary restraint of the knee under anterior tibial load, the role of the ACL in resisting internal tibial torque and the pivot shift test is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of these 2 external loading conditions on the kinematics of the intact and ACL-deficient knee and the in situ force in the ACL.
This study was a biomechanical study that used cadaveric knees with the intact knee of the specimen serving as a control.
Twelve human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. This system applied (1) a 10-Newton meter (Nm) internal tibial torque and (2) a combined 10-Nm valgus and 10-Nm internal tibial torque (simulated pivot shift test) to the intact and the ACL-deficient knee.
In the ACL-deficient knee, the isolated internal tibial torque significantly increased coupled anterior tibial translation over that of the intact knee by 94%, 48%, and 19% at full extension, 15 degrees, and 30 degrees of flexion, respectively (P <.05). In the case of the simulated pivot shift test, there were similar increases in anterior tibial translation, i.e., 103%, 61%, and 32%, respectively (P <.05). Furthermore, the anterior tibial translation under the simulated pivot shift test was significantly greater than under an isolated internal tibial torque (P <.05). Under the simulated pivot shift test, the in situ forces in the ACL were 83 +/- 16 N at full extension and 93 +/- 23 N at 15 degrees of knee flexion. These forces were also significantly higher when compared with those for an isolated internal tibial torque (P <.05).
Our data indicate that the ACL plays an important role in restraining coupled anterior tibial translation in response to the simulated pivot shift test as well as under an isolated internal tibial torque, especially when the knee is near extension. These findings are also consistent with the clinical observation of anterior tibial subluxation during the pivot shift test with the knee near extension.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 10/2000; 16(6):633-9. · 3.02 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Coupled axial tibial rotation in response to an anterior tibial load has been used as a common diagnostic measurement and as a means to load the ligamentous structures during laboratory tests. However, the exact location of the point of application of these loads as well as the corresponding sensitivity of the coupled tibial rotation to this point can have an effect on the function of the soft tissues at the joint. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of four different points of application of the anterior tibial load on the anterior tibial translation and coupled axial tibial rotation. The four points include: (1) geometric point - midway between the collateral ligament insertion sites on the tibia, (2) clinical point - a position that attempts to simulate clinical diagnostic tests, (3) medial point - a position medial to the geometric point and (4) lateral point - a position lateral to the clinical point. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to apply the anterior tibial load at the four points of application and to record the resulting joint motion. Anterior tibial translation in response to an anterior tibial load of 100N was found not to vary between the four points of application of the anterior tibial load at all flexion angles examined. However, internal tibial rotation was found for the lateral point (13+/-10 degrees at 30 degrees of knee flexion) in all specimens and clinical point (8+/-10 degrees at 30 degrees of knee flexion) while external rotation resulted when the load was applied at the medial point (-8+/-7 degrees at 30 degrees of knee flexion). Both internal and external tibial rotations occurred throughout the range of flexion when the tibial load was applied at the geometric point. The results suggest that the clinical point should be used as the point of application of the anterior tibial load whenever clinical examinations are simulated and multi-degree-of-freedom joint and soft tissue function are examined.
Journal of Biomechanics 10/2000; 33(9):1147-52. · 2.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Measurements of tibial translation in response to an external load are used in clinical and laboratory settings to diagnose and characterize knee-ligament injuries. Before these measurements can be quantified, a reference position of the knee must be established (defined as the position of the knee with no external forces or moments applied). The objective of this study was to determine the effects of cruciate ligament deficiency on this reference position and on subsequent measurements of tibial translation and, in so doing, to establish a standard of kinematic measurement for future biomechanical studies. Thirty-six human cadaveric knees were studied with a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The reference positions of the intact and posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees of 18 specimens were determined at full extension and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 degrees of flexion, and the remaining five-degree-of-freedom knee motion was unrestricted. Subsequently, under a 134-N anterior-posterior load, the resulting knee kinematics were measured with respect to the reference positions of the intact and posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. With posterior cruciate ligament deficiency, the reference position of the knee moved significantly in the posterior direction, reaching a maximal shift of 9.3 +/- 3.8 mm at 90 degrees of flexion. For the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee, posterior tibial translation ranged from 13.0 +/- 3.4 to 17.7 +/- 3.6 mm at 30 and 90 degrees, respectively, when measured with respect to the reference positions of the intact knee. When measured with respect to the reference positions of the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee, these values were significantly lower, ranging from 11.7 +/- 4.3 mm at 30 degrees of knee flexion to 8.4 +/- 4.8 mm at 90 degrees. A similar protocol was performed to study the effects of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency on 18 additional knees. With anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, only a very small anterior shift in the reference position was observed. Overall, this shift did not significantly affect measurements of tibial translation in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Thus, when the tibial translation in the posterior cruciate ligament-injured knee is measured when the reference position of the intact knee is not available, errors can occur and the measurement may not completely reflect the significance of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. However, there should be less corresponding error when measuring the tibial translation of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee because the shift in reference position with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is too small to be significant. We therefore recommend that in the clinical setting, where the reference position of the knee changes with injury, comparison of total anterior-posterior translation with that of the uninjured knee can be a more reproducible and accurate measurement for assessing cruciate-ligament injury, especially in posterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Similarly, in biomechanical testing where tibial translations are often reported for the ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees, a fixed reference position should be chosen when measuring knee kinematics. If such a standard is set, measurements of knee kinematics will more accurately reflect the altered condition of the knee and allow valid comparisons between studies.
Journal of Orthopaedic Research 04/2000; 18(2):176-82. · 2.81 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study investigated the effect of hamstring co-contraction with quadriceps on the kinematics of the human knee joint and the in-situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during a simulated isometric extension motion of the knee. Cadaveric human knee specimens (n = 10) were tested using the robotic universal force moment sensor (UFS) system and measurements of knee kinematics and in-situ forces in the ACL were based on reference positions on the path of passive flexion/extension motion of the knee. With an isolated 200 N quadriceps load, the knee underwent anterior and lateral tibial translation as well as internal tibial rotation with respect to the femur. Both translation and rotation increased when the knee was flexed from full extension to 30 of flexion; with further flexion, these motion decreased. The addition of 80 N antagonistic hamstrings load significantly reduced both anterior and lateral tibial translation as well as internal tibial rotation at knee flexion angles tested except at full extension. At 30 of flexion, the anterior tibial translation, lateral tibial translation, and internal tibial rotation were significantly reduced by 18, 46, and 30%, respectively (p<0.05). The in-situ forces in the ACL under the quadriceps load were found to increase from 27.8+/-9.3 N at full extension to a maximum of 44.9+/-13.8 N at 15 of flexion and then decrease to 10 N beyond 60 of flexion. The in-situ force at 15 was significantly higher than that at other flexion angles (p<0.05). The addition of the hamstring load of 80 N significantly reduced the in-situ forces in the ACL at 15, 30 and 60 of flexion by 30, 43, and 44%, respectively (p<0.05). These data demonstrate that maximum knee motion may not necessarily correspond to the highest in-situ forces in the ACL. The data also suggest that hamstring co-contraction with quadriceps is effective in reducing excessive forces in the ACL particularly between 15 and 60 of knee flexion.
Journal of Biomechanics 04/1999; 32(4):395-400. · 2.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study investigated the impact of a combination of axial compressive and anterior-posterior tibial loads on the in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament. An axial compressive load is believed to contribute to increased stability of the knee joint; however, its effect on in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament has not been clearly defined, to our knowledge. It was hypothesized that the application of an axial compressive load, when combined with an anterior tibial load, would result in larger in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament than those caused by an isolated anterior tibial load. With use of a porcine knee model, the results confirmed this hypothesis; the addition of a 200 N axial compressive load to a 100 N anterior tibial load increased knee stability by reducing anterior-posterior tibial translation and internal-external tibial rotation and also caused a significant increase in in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament (p < 0.05). Specifically, there was a 34% increase in the in situ force at 30 degrees of flexion, a 68% increase at 60 degrees of flexion, and an 84% increase at 90 degrees of flexion compared with those for an isolated anterior tibial load of 100 N. Additionally, there was a statistically significant increase of the in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament at 60 and 90 degrees as compared with those at 30 degrees. These results suggest that axial compressive loads on the knee may play a role in injury of the anterior cruciate ligament when the knee is flexed.
Journal of Orthopaedic Research 01/1998; 16(1):122-7. · 2.81 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Despite its current popularity and relative success, endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft has not yet been perfected. Using a recently developed robotic/UFS testing system, we assessed the overall stability of porcine knees following ACL reconstruction with different sites of tibial graft fixation--proximal, central, and distal. Testing of the intact knee was performed first to determine the normal anterior-posterior (A-P) displacements and in situ forces of the ACL under 110 N of anterior tibial loading of 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of knee flexion. The knee was then reconstructed with a BPTB autograft, and the distal end of the graft was fixed sequentially at three different locations in each specimen--proximal, central, distal. A-P testing was repeated for each fixation site, and the resulting knee kinematics and the in situ forces of the grafts were compared to the intact case. The site of tibial fixation was demonstrated to have a significant effect on the resulting anterior displacement and internal rotation of the tibia as well as the in situ forces of the graft. Proximal fixation produced the most stable knee (A-P displacements reduced to 120% of intact at 30 degrees and 170% at 90 degrees), becoming significantly less stable with more distal fixation. These results suggest that proximal graft fixation may provide the most acute stability of the reconstructed knee.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 05/1997; 13(2):177-82. · 3.02 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We developed a system that uses a 6-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) robotic manipulator combined with a 6-DOF force-moment sensor and a control system. The system is used to find and record the passive knee flexion path for controlling the knee flexion positions. It is also used to strain a knee structure by finding a multiple-DOF path in response to specific joint loading, e.g. anterior-posterior tibial force application. It is additionally used to measure in-situ forces in ligaments by recording differences in forces and moments when repeating a prerecorded path, both before and after removal of the ligament of interest. Example applications are included in the study.
Journal of Biomechanics 11/1996; 29(10):1357-60. · 2.43 Impact Factor
