Publications (56)864 Total impact
-
Article: Senataxin Associates with Replication Forks to Protect Fork Integrity across RNA-Polymerase-II-Transcribed Genes.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Transcription hinders replication fork progression and stability. The ATR checkpoint and specialized DNA helicases assist DNA synthesis across transcription units to protect genome integrity. Combining genomic and genetic approaches together with the analysis of replication intermediates, we searched for factors coordinating replication with transcription. We show that the Sen1/Senataxin DNA/RNA helicase associates with forks, promoting their progression across RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-transcribed genes. sen1 mutants accumulate aberrant DNA structures and DNA-RNA hybrids while forks clash head-on with RNAPII transcription units. These replication defects correlate with hyperrecombination and checkpoint activation in sen1 mutants. The Sen1 function at the forks is separable from its role in RNA processing. Our data, besides unmasking a key role for Senataxin in coordinating replication with transcription, provide a framework for understanding the pathological mechanisms caused by Senataxin deficiencies and leading to the severe neurodegenerative diseases ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2 and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 4.Cell 11/2012; 151(4):835-46. · 32.40 Impact Factor -
Article: Preserving the genome by regulating chromatin association with the nuclear envelope.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The nuclear envelope compartmentalizes chromatin within eukaryotic cells and influences diverse cellular functions by controlling nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Recent evidence has revealed the importance of interactions between chromatin and nuclear envelope components in the maintenance of genome integrity. Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), traditionally regarded as transport gateways, have emerged as specialized hubs involved in organizing genome architecture, influencing DNA topology, and modulating DNA repair. Here, we review the interplay between the nuclear envelope, chromatin and DNA damage checkpoint pathways, and discuss the physiological and pathological implications of these associations.Trends in cell biology 07/2012; 22(9):465-73. · 12.12 Impact Factor -
Article: Dna2 offers support for stalled forks.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The ATR and ATM checkpoint kinases preserve the integrity of replicating chromosomes by preventing the reversal of stalled and terminal replication forks. Hu et al. now show that the ATR pathway targets the Dna2 nuclease to process stalled forks and counteract fork reversal.Cell 06/2012; 149(6):1181-3. · 32.40 Impact Factor -
Article: Molecular pathways: old drugs define new pathways: non-histone acetylation at the crossroads of the DNA damage response and autophagy.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Histone deacetylases (HDAC) modulate acetylation and the function of histone and non-histone proteins. HDAC inhibitors have been developed to block the aberrant action of HDACs in cancer, and several are in clinical use (vorinostat, romidepsin, and valproic acid). Detailed understanding of their action is lacking, however, and their clinical activity is limited in most cases. Recently, HDACs have been involved in the control of the DNA damage response (DDR) at several levels and in directly regulating the acetylation of a number of DDR proteins (including CtIP and Exo1). Mechanistically, acetylation leads to the degradation of double-strand break repair enzymes through autophagy, providing a novel, direct link between DDR and autophagy. These observations, obtained in yeast cells, should now be translated to mammalian model systems and cancer cells to reveal whether this acetylation link is maintained in mammals, and if and how it is deregulated in cancer. In addition to HDACs, DDR and autophagy have been addressed pharmacologically, suggesting that the acetylation link, if involved in cancer, can be exploited for the design of new anticancer treatments.Clinical Cancer Research 04/2012; 18(9):2436-42. · 7.74 Impact Factor -
Article: Preventing replication stress to maintain genome stability: resolving conflicts between replication and transcription.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: DNA and RNA polymerases clash along the genome as they compete for the same DNA template. Cells have evolved specialized strategies to prevent and resolve replication and transcription interference. Here, we review the topology and architecture at sites of replication fork clashes with transcription bubbles as well as the regulatory circuits that control replication fork passage across transcribed genes. In the case of RNA polymerase II-transcribed genes, cotranscriptional processes such as mRNA maturation, splicing, and export influence the integrity of replication forks and transcribed loci. Fork passage likely contributes to reset the epigenetic landscape, influencing gene expression and transcriptional memory. When any of these processes are not properly coordinated, aberrant outcomes such as fork reversal and R-loop formation arise and trigger unscheduled recombinogenic events and genome rearrangements. The evolutionary implications of such conflicts on genome dynamics and their potential impact on oncogenic stress are discussed.Molecular cell 03/2012; 45(6):710-8. · 14.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Acetylation: a novel link between double-strand break repair and autophagy.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are clinically relevant because they are used as anticancer drugs. Recent evidence sheds light on an intriguing connection among the DNA damage response (DDR), protein acetylation, and autophagy. HDAC inhibitors have been shown to counteract key steps in the cellular response to double-strand break formation by affecting checkpoint activation, homologous recombination-mediated repair of DNA lesions, and stability of crucial enzymes involved in resection of DNA ends. The degradation of the resection factors depends on autophagy, which plays a detrimental role when cells are in a hyperacetylated state and experience treatment with radiomimetic anticancer drugs. Future work will be required to further investigate the mechanisms underlying the link between acetylation, autophagy, and the DDR, as well as the significance of mTORC1 inhibitors, which are potent inducers of autophagy that are now used in cancer treatment.Cancer Research 03/2012; 72(6):1332-5. · 7.86 Impact Factor -
Article: G-quadruplex-induced instability during leading-strand replication.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: G-quadruplexes are four-stranded nucleic acid structures whose biological functions remain poorly understood. In the yeast S. cerevisiae, we report that G-quadruplexes form and, if not properly processed, pose a specific challenge to replication. We show that the G-quadruplex-prone CEB1 tandem array is tolerated when inserted near ARS305 replication origin in wild-type cells but is very frequently destabilized upon treatment with the potent Phen-DC(3) G-quadruplex ligand, or in the absence of the G-quadruplex-unwinding Pif1 helicase, only when the G-rich strand is the template of leading-strand replication. The orientation-dependent instability is associated with the formation of Rad51-Rad52-dependent X-shaped intermediates during replication detected by two-dimensional (2D) gels, and relies on the presence of intact G-quadruplex motifs in CEB1 and on the activity of ARS305. The asymmetrical behaviour of G-quadruplex prone sequences during replication has implications for their evolutionary dynamics within genomes, including the maintenance of G-rich telomeres.The EMBO Journal 08/2011; 30(19):4033-46. · 9.20 Impact Factor -
Article: The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Transcription hinders replication fork progression and stability, and the Mec1/ATR checkpoint protects fork integrity. Examining checkpoint-dependent mechanisms controlling fork stability, we find that fork reversal and dormant origin firing due to checkpoint defects are rescued in checkpoint mutants lacking THO, TREX-2, or inner-basket nucleoporins. Gene gating tethers transcribed genes to the nuclear periphery and is counteracted by checkpoint kinases through phosphorylation of nucleoporins such as Mlp1. Checkpoint mutants fail to detach transcribed genes from nuclear pores, thus generating topological impediments for incoming forks. Releasing this topological complexity by introducing a double-strand break between a fork and a transcribed unit prevents fork collapse. Mlp1 mutants mimicking constitutive checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation also alleviate checkpoint defects. We propose that the checkpoint assists fork progression and stability at transcribed genes by phosphorylating key nucleoporins and counteracting gene gating, thus neutralizing the topological tension generated at nuclear pore gated genes.Cell 07/2011; 146(2):233-46. · 32.40 Impact Factor -
Article: Genome-wide function of THO/TREX in active genes prevents R-loop-dependent replication obstacles.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: THO/TREX is a conserved nuclear complex that functions in mRNP biogenesis and prevents transcription-associated recombination. Whether or not it has a ubiquitous role in the genome is unknown. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-chip studies reveal that the Hpr1 component of THO and the Sub2 RNA-dependent ATPase have genome-wide distributions at active ORFs in yeast. In contrast to RNA polymerase II, evenly distributed from promoter to termination regions, THO and Sub2 are absent at promoters and distributed in a gradual 5' → 3' gradient. This is accompanied by a genome-wide impact of THO-Sub2 deletions on expression of highly expressed, long and high G+C-content genes. Importantly, ChIP-chips reveal an over-recruitment of Rrm3 in active genes in THO mutants that is reduced by RNaseH1 overexpression. Our work establishes a genome-wide function for THO-Sub2 in transcription elongation and mRNP biogenesis that function to prevent the accumulation of transcription-mediated replication obstacles, including R-loops.The EMBO Journal 06/2011; 30(15):3106-19. · 9.20 Impact Factor -
Article: HDACs link the DNA damage response, processing of double-strand breaks and autophagy.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Protein acetylation is mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and deacetylases (HDACs), which influence chromatin dynamics, protein turnover and the DNA damage response. ATM and ATR mediate DNA damage checkpoints by sensing double-strand breaks and single-strand-DNA-RFA nucleofilaments, respectively. However, it is unclear how acetylation modulates the DNA damage response. Here we show that HDAC inhibition/ablation specifically counteracts yeast Mec1 (orthologue of human ATR) activation, double-strand-break processing and single-strand-DNA-RFA nucleofilament formation. Moreover, the recombination protein Sae2 (human CtIP) is acetylated and degraded after HDAC inhibition. Two HDACs, Hda1 and Rpd3, and one HAT, Gcn5, have key roles in these processes. We also find that HDAC inhibition triggers Sae2 degradation by promoting autophagy that affects the DNA damage sensitivity of hda1 and rpd3 mutants. Rapamycin, which stimulates autophagy by inhibiting Tor, also causes Sae2 degradation. We propose that Rpd3, Hda1 and Gcn5 control chromosome stability by coordinating the ATR checkpoint and double-strand-break processing with autophagy.Nature 03/2011; 471(7336):74-9. · 36.28 Impact Factor -
Article: A lethal combination for cancer cells: synthetic lethality screenings for drug discovery.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In recent years, cancer drug discovery has faced the challenging task of integrating the huge amount of information coming from the genomic studies with the need of developing highly selective target-based strategies within the context of tumour cells that experience massive genome instability. The combination between genetic and genomic technologies has been extremely useful and has contributed to efficiently transfer certain approaches typical of basic science to drug discover projects. An example comes from the synthetic lethal approaches, very powerful procedures that employ the rational used by geneticists working on model organisms. Applying the synthetic lethality (SL) screenings to anticancer therapy allows exploiting the typical features of tumour cells, such as genome instability, without changing them, as opposed to the conventional anticancer strategies that aim at counteracting the oncogenic signalling pathways. Recent and very encouraging clinical studies clearly show that certain promising anticancer compounds work through a synthetic lethal mechanism by targeting pathways that are specifically essential for the viability of cancer cells but not of normal cells. Herein we describe the rationale of the synthetic lethality approaches and the potential applications for anticancer therapy.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 11/2010; 46(16):2889-95. · 4.12 Impact Factor -
Article: Replication termination at eukaryotic chromosomes is mediated by Top2 and occurs at genomic loci containing pausing elements.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chromosome replication initiates at multiple replicons and terminates when forks converge. In E. coli, the Tus-TER complex mediates polar fork converging at the terminator region, and aberrant termination events challenge chromosome integrity and segregation. Since in eukaryotes, termination is less characterized, we used budding yeast to identify the factors assisting fork fusion at replicating chromosomes. Using genomic and mechanistic studies, we have identified and characterized 71 chromosomal termination regions (TERs). TERs contain fork pausing elements that influence fork progression and merging. The Rrm3 DNA helicase assists fork progression across TERs, counteracting the accumulation of X-shaped structures. The Top2 DNA topoisomerase associates at TERs in S phase, and G2/M facilitates fork fusion and prevents DNA breaks and genome rearrangements at TERs. We propose that in eukaryotes, replication fork barriers, Rrm3, and Top2 coordinate replication fork progression and fusion at TERs, thus counteracting abnormal genomic transitions.Molecular cell 08/2010; 39(4):595-605. · 14.61 Impact Factor -
Article: The double life of Holliday junctions.
Cell Research 06/2010; 20(6):611-3. · 8.19 Impact Factor -
Article: Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Aberrant DNA replication is a major source of the mutations and chromosome rearrangements that are associated with pathological disorders. When replication is compromised, DNA becomes more prone to breakage. Secondary structures, highly transcribed DNA sequences and damaged DNA stall replication forks, which then require checkpoint factors and specialized enzymatic activities for their stabilization and subsequent advance. These mechanisms ensure that the local DNA damage response, which enables replication fork progression and DNA repair in S phase, is coupled with cell cycle transitions. The mechanisms that operate in eukaryotic cells to promote replication fork integrity and coordinate replication with other aspects of chromosome maintenance are becoming clear.Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 03/2010; 11(3):208-19. · 39.12 Impact Factor -
Article: Leaping forks at inverted repeats.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Genome rearrangements are often associated with genome instability observed in cancer and other pathological disorders. Different types of repeat elements are common in genomes and are prone to instability. S-phase checkpoints, recombination, and telomere maintenance pathways have been implicated in suppressing chromosome rearrangements, but little is known about the molecular mechanisms and the chromosome intermediates generating such genome-wide instability. In the December 15, 2009, issue of Genes & Development, two studies by Paek and colleagues (2861-2875) and Mizuno and colleagues (pp. 2876-2886), demonstrate that nearby inverted repeats in budding and fission yeasts recombine spontaneously and frequently to form dicentric and acentric chromosomes. The recombination mechanism underlying this phenomenon does not appear to require double-strand break formation, and is likely caused by a replication mechanism involving template switching.Genes & development 01/2010; 24(1):5-9. · 12.08 Impact Factor -
Article: Genome-organizing factors Top2 and Hmo1 prevent chromosome fragility at sites of S phase transcription.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Specialized topoisomerases solve the topological constraints arising when replication forks encounter transcription. We have investigated the contribution of Top2 in S phase transcription. Specifically in S phase, Top2 binds intergenic regions close to transcribed genes. The Top2-bound loci exhibit low nucleosome density and accumulate gammaH2A when Top2 is defective. These intergenic loci associate with the HMG protein Hmo1 throughout the cell cycle and are refractory to the histone variant Htz1. In top2 mutants, Hmo1 is deleterious and accumulates at pericentromeric regions in G2/M. Our data indicate that Top2 is dispensable for transcription and that Hmo1 and Top2 bind in the proximity of genes transcribed in S phase suppressing chromosome fragility at the M-G1 transition. We propose that an Hmo1-dependent epigenetic signature together with Top2 mediate an S phase architectural pathway to preserve genome integrity.Cell 10/2009; 138(5):870-84. · 32.40 Impact Factor -
Article: The checkpoint response to replication stress.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer cells, and defective DNA replication, repair and recombination have been linked to its etiology. Increasing evidence suggests that proteins influencing S-phase processes such as replication fork movement and stability, repair events and replication completion, have significant roles in maintaining genome stability. DNA damage and replication stress activate a signal transduction cascade, often referred to as the checkpoint response. A central goal of the replication checkpoint is to maintain the integrity of the replication forks while facilitating replication completion and DNA repair and coordinating these events with cell cycle transitions. Progression through the cell cycle in spite of defective or incomplete DNA synthesis or unrepaired DNA lesions may result in broken chromosomes, genome aberrations, and an accumulation of mutations. In this review we discuss the multiple roles of the replication checkpoint during replication and in response to replication stress, as well as the enzymatic activities that cooperate with the checkpoint pathway to promote fork resumption and repair of DNA lesions thereby contributing to genome integrity.DNA repair 06/2009; 8(9):1038-46. · 4.20 Impact Factor -
Article: Replicon dynamics, dormant origin firing, and terminal fork integrity after double-strand break formation.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In response to replication stress, the Mec1/ATR and SUMO pathways control stalled- and damaged-fork stability. We investigated the S phase response at forks encountering a broken template (termed the terminal fork). We show that double-strand break (DSB) formation can locally trigger dormant origin firing. Irreversible fork resolution at the break does not impede progression of the other fork in the same replicon (termed the sister fork). The Mre11-Tel1/ATM response acts at terminal forks, preventing accumulation of cruciform DNA intermediates that tether sister chromatids and can undergo nucleolytic processing. We conclude that sister forks can be uncoupled during replication and that, after DSB-induced fork termination, replication is rescued by dormant origin firing or adjacent replicons. We have uncovered a Tel1/ATM- and Mre11-dependent response controlling terminal fork integrity. Our findings have implications for those genome instability syndromes that accumulate DNA breaks during S phase and for forks encountering eroding telomeres.Cell 05/2009; 137(2):247-58. · 32.40 Impact Factor -
Article: Sgs1 function in the repair of DNA replication intermediates is separable from its role in homologous recombinational repair.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Mutations in human homologues of the bacterial RecQ helicase cause diseases leading to cancer predisposition and/or shortened lifespan (Werner, Bloom, and Rothmund-Thomson syndromes). The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has one RecQ helicase, Sgs1, which functions with Top3 and Rmi1 in DNA repair. Here, we report separation-of-function alleles of SGS1 that suppress the slow growth of top3Delta and rmi1Delta cells similar to an SGS1 deletion, but are resistant to DNA damage similar to wild-type SGS1. In one allele, the second acidic region is deleted, and in the other, only a single aspartic acid residue 664 is deleted. sgs1-D664Delta, unlike sgs1Delta, neither disrupts DNA recombination nor has synthetic growth defects when combined with DNA repair mutants. However, during S phase, it accumulates replication-associated X-shaped structures at damaged replication forks. Furthermore, fluorescent microscopy reveals that the sgs1-D664Delta allele exhibits increased spontaneous RPA foci, suggesting that the persistent X-structures may contain single-stranded DNA. Taken together, these results suggest that the Sgs1 function in repair of DNA replication intermediates can be uncoupled from its role in homologous recombinational repair.The EMBO Journal 03/2009; 28(7):915-25. · 9.20 Impact Factor -
Article: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Recombination is important for DNA repair, but it can also contribute to genome rearrangements. RecQ helicases, including yeast Sgs1 and human BLM, safeguard genome integrity through their functions in DNA recombination. Sgs1 prevents the accumulation of Rad51-dependent sister chromatid junctions at damaged replication forks, and its functionality seems to be regulated by Ubc9- and Mms21-dependent sumoylation. We show that mutations in Smc5-6 and Esc2 also lead to an accumulation of recombinogenic structures at damaged replication forks. Because Smc5-6 is sumoylated in an Mms21-dependent manner, this finding suggests that Smc5-6 may be a crucial target of Mms21 implicated in this process. Our data reveal that Smc5-6 and Esc2 are required to tolerate DNA damage and that their functionality is critical in genotoxic conditions in the absence of Sgs1. As reported previously for Sgs1 and Smc5-6, we find that Esc2 physically interacts with Ubc9 and SUMO. This interaction is correlated with the ability of Esc2 to promote DNA damage tolerance. Collectively, these data suggest that Esc2 and Smc5-6 act in concert with Sgs1 to prevent the accumulation of recombinogenic structures at damaged replication forks, likely by integrating sumoylation activities to regulate the repair pathways in response to damaged DNA.Molecular biology of the cell 02/2009; 20(6):1671-82. · 5.98 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
- Molecular Cell (5)
- Cell (5)
- Cell (4)
- Genes & Development (4)
- The EMBO Journal (4)
Institutions
-
2012
-
Universidad de Salamanca
Salamanca, Castile and Leon, Spain
-
-
2010–2011
-
Campus IFOM-IEO
Milano, Lombardy, Italy
-
-
2004–2010
-
University of Milan
- Department of Biomedical Science
Milano, Lombardy, Italy
-
-
2005–2009
-
FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation
Milano, Lombardy, Italy
-
-
2002–2004
-
Brandeis University
Waltham, MA, USA -
ETH Zurich
- Department of Biology
Zürich, ZH, Switzerland
-
