Sarah T Hawley

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Are you Sarah T Hawley?

Claim your profile

Publications (124)726.78 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early-stage breast cancer patients face a series of complex treatment decisions, with the first typically being choice of locoregional treatment. There is a need for tools to support patients in this decision-making process. We developed an innovative, online locoregional treatment tool based on International Patient Decision Aids Standards criteria. We evaluated its impact on patient knowledge about treatment and appraisal of decision making in a pilot study using a clinical sample of newly diagnosed, breast cancer patients who were randomized to view the decision aid website first or complete a survey prior to viewing the decision aid. Differences in knowledge and decision appraisal between the two groups were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Computer-generated preferences for treatment were compared with patients' stated preferences using chi-square tests. One hundred and one newly diagnosed patients were randomized to view the website first or take a survey first. Women who viewed the website first had slightly higher, though not significantly, knowledge about surgery (p = 0.29) and reconstruction (p = 0.10) than the survey-first group. Those who viewed the website first also appraised their decision process significantly more favorably than did those who took the survey first (p < 0.05 for most decision outcomes). There was very good concordance between computer-suggested and stated treatment preferences. This pilot study suggests that an interactive decision tool shows promise for supporting early-stage breast cancer patients with complicated treatment decision making.
    The patient 07/2015; DOI:10.1007/s40271-015-0135-y · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding which attributes of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests drive older adults' test preferences and choices may help improve decision making surrounding CRC screening in older adults. To explore older adults' preferences for CRC-screening test attributes and screening tests, we conducted a survey with a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a directly selected preferred attribute question, and an unlabeled screening test-choice question in 116 cognitively intact adults aged 70-90 years, without a history of CRC or inflammatory bowel disease. Each participant answered ten discrete choice questions presenting two hypothetical tests comprised of four attributes: testing procedure, mortality reduction, test frequency, and complications. DCE responses were used to estimate each participant's most important attribute and to simulate their preferred test among three existing CRC-screening tests. For each individual, we compared the DCE-derived attributes to directly selected attributes, and the DCE-derived preferred test to a directly selected unlabeled test. Older adults do not overwhelmingly value any one CRC-screening test attribute or prefer one type of CRC-screening test over other tests. However, small absolute DCE-derived preferences for the testing procedure attribute and for sigmoidoscopy-equivalent screening tests were revealed. Neither general health, functional, nor cognitive health status were associated with either an individual's most important attribute or most preferred test choice. The DCE-derived most important attribute was associated with each participant's directly selected unlabeled test choice. Older adults' preferences for CRC-screening tests are not easily predicted. Medical providers should actively explore older adults' preferences for CRC screening, so that they can order a screening test that is concordant with their patients' values. Effective interventions are needed to support complex decision making surrounding CRC screening in older adults.
    Patient Preference and Adherence 07/2015; 9:1005-16. DOI:10.2147/PPA.S82203 · 1.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the effectiveness of chemoprevention (tamoxifen and raloxifene) in preventing breast cancer among women at high risk for the disease, uptake is low. The objective of this study was to determine the tradeoff preferences for various attributes associated with chemoprevention among women not currently taking the drugs. We used rating-based conjoint analysis to evaluate the relative importance of a number of attributes associated with chemoprevention, including risk of side effects, drug effectiveness, time needed to take the drugs, and availability of a blood test to see if the drugs were working in an Internet sample of women. We generated mean importance values and part-worth utilities for all attribute levels associated with taking chemoprevention. We then used multivariable linear regression to examine attribute importance scores controlling for participant age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, educational level, and a family history of breast cancer. Overall interest in taking chemoprevention was low among the 1094 women included in the analytic sample, even for the scenario in which participants would receive the greatest benefit and fewest risks associated with taking the drugs. Time needed to take the pill for it to work and 5-year risk of breast cancer were the most important attributes driving tradeoff preferences between the chemoprevention scenarios. Interest in taking chemoprevention among this sample of women at average risk was low. Addressing women's concerns about the time needed to take chemoprevention for it to work may help clinicians improve uptake of the drugs among those likely to benefit.
    The patient 06/2015; DOI:10.1007/s40271-015-0134-z · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate preferences for and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse cohort of patients with breast cancer identified through population-based registries, with attention to differences by race/ethnicity. We surveyed women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer from 2005 to 2007, as reported to the SEER registries of metropolitan Los Angeles and Detroit, about experiences with hereditary risk evaluation. Multivariable models evaluated correlates of a strong desire for genetic testing, unmet need for discussion with a health care professional, and receipt of testing. Among 1,536 patients who completed the survey, 35% expressed strong desire for genetic testing, 28% reported discussing testing with a health care professional, and 19% reported test receipt. Strong desire for testing was more common in younger women, Latinas, and those with family history. Minority patients were significantly more likely to have unmet need for discussion (failure to discuss genetic testing with a health professional when they had a strong desire for testing): odds ratios of 1.68, 2.44, and 7.39 for blacks, English-speaking Latinas, and Spanish-speaking Latinas compared with whites, respectively. Worry in the long-term survivorship period was higher among those with unmet need for discussion (48.7% v 24.9%; P <.001). Patients who received genetic testing were younger, less likely to be black, and more likely to have a family cancer history. Many patients, especially minorities, express a strong desire for genetic testing and may benefit from discussion to clarify risks. Clinicians should discuss genetic risk even with patients they perceive to be at low risk, as this may reduce worry. © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 04/2015; 33(14). DOI:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.5885 · 18.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    The Journal of Urology 04/2015; 193(4):e307. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.1174 · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • Sarah T. Hawley · Reshma Jagsi
    04/2015; 1(1). DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.186
  • Sarah T Hawley
    Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 04/2015; 18(2):151-2. DOI:10.1111/hex.12360 · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • The Journal of Urology 04/2015; 193(4):e153. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.869 · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    The Journal of Urology 04/2015; 193(4):e309-e310. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.1179 · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although breast conservation is therapeutically equivalent to mastectomy for most patients with early-stage breast cancer, an increasing number of patients are pursuing mastectomy, which may be followed by breast reconstruction. We sought to evaluate long-term quality of life and cosmetic outcomes after different locoregional management approaches, as perceived by patients themselves. We surveyed women with a diagnosis of nonmetastatic breast cancer from 2005 to 2007, as reported to the Los Angeles and Detroit population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. We received responses from 2290 women approximately 9 months after diagnosis (73% response rate) and from 1536 of these 4 years later. We evaluated quality of life and patterns and correlates of satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes overall and, more specifically, within the subgroup undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction, using multivariable linear regression. Of the 1450 patients who responded to both surveys and experienced no recurrence, 963 underwent breast-conserving surgery, 263 mastectomy without reconstruction, and 222 mastectomy with reconstruction. Cosmetic satisfaction was similar between those receiving breast conservation therapy and those receiving mastectomy with reconstruction. Among patients receiving mastectomy with reconstruction, reconstruction type and radiation receipt were associated with satisfaction (P < 0.001), with an adjusted scaled satisfaction score of 4.7 for patients receiving autologous reconstruction without radiation, 4.4 for patients receiving autologous reconstruction and radiation therapy, 4.1 for patients receiving implant reconstruction without radiation therapy, and 2.8 for patients receiving implant reconstruction and radiation therapy. Patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction was similar after breast conservation and after mastectomy with reconstruction. In patients undergoing postmastectomy radiation, the use of autologous reconstruction may mitigate the deleterious impact of radiation on cosmetic outcomes.
    Annals of Surgery 01/2015; 261(6). DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000908 · 8.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Helping patients to maximize their autonomy in breast cancer decision-making is an important aspect of patient-centered care. Shared decision-making is a strategy that aims to maximize patient autonomy by integrating the values and preferences of the patient with the biomedical expertise of the physician. Application of this approach in breast cancer decision-making has not been uniform across cancer-specific interventions (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy), and in some circumstances may present challenges to evidence-based care delivery. Increasingly precise estimates of individual patients' risk of recurrence and commensurate predicted benefit from certain therapies hold significant promise in helping patients exercise autonomous decision-making for their breast cancer care, yet will also likely complicate decision-making for certain subgroups of patients.
    01/2015; 4(1):53-64. DOI:10.2217/bmt.14.47
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: . While studies suggest most women have little regret regarding their breast cancer treatment decisions immediately following treatment, no studies to date have evaluated how regret may change over time. . To measure the stability of posttreatment decision regret over time among women with breast cancer. . Women diagnosed with breast cancer between August 2005 and May 2007 reported to the Detroit, Michigan, or Los Angeles County Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry and completed surveys at 9 months following diagnosis (time 1) and again approximately 4 years later (time 2). A decision regret scale consisting of 5 items was summed to create 2 decision regret scores at both time 1 and time 2 (range, 0-20). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine change in regret from 9 months to 4 years. Independent variables included surgery type, receipt of reconstruction, and recurrence status at follow-up. The model controlled for demographic and clinical factors. . The analytic sample included 1536 women. Mean regret in the overall sample was 4.9 at time 1 and 5.4 at time 2 (P < 0.001). In the multivariable linear model, we found no difference in change in decision regret over time by surgery type. Reporting a new diagnosis of breast cancer at time 2 was associated with a 2.6-point increase in regret over time compared with women without an additional diagnosis (P = 0.003). Receipt of reconstruction was not associated with change in decision regret over time. . Decision regret following treatment was low and relatively stable over time for most women. Those facing an additional diagnosis of breast cancer following treatment may be at risk for elevated regret-related distress. © The Author(s) 2014.
    Medical Decision Making 12/2014; 35(4). DOI:10.1177/0272989X14564432 · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • Sarah T. Hawley · Jennifer Elston Lafata
    JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 12/2014; 106(12):dju383-dju383. DOI:10.1093/jnci/dju383 · 15.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Breast cancer patients face several preference-sensitive treatment decisions. Feelings such as regret or having had inadequate information about these decisions can significantly alter patient perceptions of recovery and recurrence. Numerous objective measures of decision quality (e.g., knowledge assessments, values concordance measures) have been developed; there are far fewer measures of subjective decision quality and little consensus regarding how the construct should be assessed. The current study explores the psychometric properties of a new subjective quality decision measure for breast cancer treatment that could be used for other preference sensitive decisions. Methods320 women aged 20¿79 diagnosed with AJCC stage 0 ¿ III breast cancer were surveyed at two cancer specialty centers. Decision quality was assessed with single items representing six dimensions: regret, satisfaction, and fit as well as perceived adequacy of information, time, and involvement. Women rated decision quality for their overall treatment experience and surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation decisions separately. Principle components was used to explore factor structure. After scales were formed, internal consistency was computed using Cronbach¿s alpha. The association of each of the four final scale scores was examined by Pearson correlation.ResultsFor overall breast cancer treatment as well as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation decisions, the six items yielded a single factor solution. Factor loadings of the six decision items were all above .45 across the overall and treatment-specific scales, with the exception of ¿Right for You¿ for chemotherapy and radiation. Internal consistency was 0.77, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.78 for the overall, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation decision quality scales, respectively.Conclusions Our measure of subjective appraisal of breast cancer treatment decisions includes 5 related elements; regret and satisfaction as well as perceived adequacy of information, time, and involvement. Future research is needed to establish norms for the measure as is further psychometric testing, particularly to examine how it is associated with outcomes such as quality of life, psychological coping and objective decision quality.
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12/2014; 14(1):110. DOI:10.1186/s12911-014-0110-x · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Test the impact of tailoring CRC screening messages for African Americans (AAs) using novel theoretical variables and to examine moderating effect of communication preferences. Methods Participants were randomized to receive two minimally tailored or two enhanced tailored print newsletters addressing CRC. The enhanced intervention was tailored on self-determination theory and other novel psychological constructs. Minimal tailoring only used information available in the patient's EHR. The primary outcome was CRC screening based on EHR. Participants were AA members aged 50-74 of an integrated health care delivery system not up to date on CRC screening. Results We enrolled 881 participants. CRC screening participation rates at 1-year follow up were 20.5% and 21.5% in the minimally and enhanced tailored groups, respectively. Communication preferences moderated the impact of the intervention. Specifically, among those with an autonomous communication preference, screening rates in the minimally and enhanced tailored groups were 17.1% and 25.9%, respectively, while no intervention effect was evident among those with a directive preference. Conclusion Future research is needed to explore the impact of communication preference tailoring for other health behaviors and among other populations.
    Patient Education and Counseling 12/2014; 97(3). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.013 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is suboptimal, particularly for vulnerable populations. Effective intervention programs are needed to increase screening rates. We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to learn about how vulnerable individuals in North Carolina value different aspects of CRC screening programs.Methods We enrolled English-speaking adults ages 50¿75 at average risk of CRC from rural North Carolina communities with low rates of CRC screening, targeting those with public or no insurance and low incomes. Participants received basic information about CRC screening and potential program features, then completed a 16 task DCE and survey questions that examined preferences for four attributes of screening programs: testing options available; travel time required; money paid for screening or rewards for completing screening; and the portion of the cost of follow-up care paid out of pocket. We used Hierarchical Bayesian methods to calculate individual-level utilities for the 4 attributes¿ levels and individual-level attribute importance scores. For each individual, the attribute with the highest importance score was considered the most important attribute. Individual utilities were then aggregated to produce mean utilities for each attribute. We also compared DCE-based results with those from direct questions in a post-DCE survey.ResultsWe enrolled 150 adults. Mean age was 57.8 (range 50¿74); 55% were women; 76% White and 19% African-American; 87% annual household income under $30,000; and 51% were uninsured. Individuals preferred shorter travel; rewards or small copayments compared with large copayments; programs that included stool testing as an option; and greater coverage of follow-up costs. Follow-up cost coverage was most frequently found to be the most important attribute from the DCE (47%); followed by test reward/copayment (33%). From the survey, proportion of follow-up costs paid was most frequently cited as most important (42% of participants), followed by testing options (32%). There was moderate agreement (45%) in attribute importance between the DCE and the single question in the post-DCE survey.Conclusions Screening test copayments and follow-up care coverage costs are important program characteristics in this vulnerable, rural population.
    BMC Health Services Research 11/2014; 14(1):611. DOI:10.1186/s12913-014-0611-4 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Sarah T. Hawley · Steven Katz · Reshma Jagsi
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Concern has been raised about the growing rate of extensive breast surgery, including contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). We sought to assess patient reported factors associated with CPM decisions in a population-based sample Methods: Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients identified from Los Angeles and Georgia SEER registries were surveyed approximately 5 months after diagnosis. Patients were asked about their surgical treatment (lumpectomy-L, unilateral mastectomy-UM, CPM), and if they had a genetic test. Factors contributing to decision making, including knowledge about the benefit of CPM and values important to patients’ surgical decisions, were compared with surgery type using chi-square tests. Multinomal logistic regression (MNL) was ussed to assess factors associated with CPM compared to UM and L. Results: 509 responses have been received to date (anticipated N of 1,000). Of these, 62.5% received lumpectomy, 15% UM and 22.6% CPM. Of women who had CPM, 43.4% did not have a genetic test, 45.2% had a negative test, and 11.3% had a genetic mutation. Of women without a mutation who got CPM, 36.5% thought CPM improved survival in all women with breast cancer, and 19.8% thought it would reduce risk of cancer coming back. These women more often reported it was very important to reduce worry about recurrence when choosing their surgery than did patients who got UM or L (78.4% vs. 62.5%, 55.9%, P<0.010) but were no more likely to indicate they wanted to do everything possible. Women who were incorrect regarding survival benefit of CPM were significantly more likely than those who were correct (RRR 4.88; 95% CI 2.37-10.21) to receive CPM vs. lumpectomy. Conclusions: In this population-based sample, rates of CPM were high and it was most often received by women without a genetic mutation. CPM decisions appear driven by a desire to reduce worry about recurrence, while also being made with low knowledge about the impact of CPM on survival and recurrence. Further work to understand decision-making for CPM in the absence of clinical indications is warranted.
    The 36th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making; 10/2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite improved survival with chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer (CRC), patients may suffer substantial economic hardship during treatment. Methods for quantifying financial burden in CRC patients are lacking.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) may suffer significant economic hardship during treatment. Complications are common after surgery for CRC and may exacerbate the financial burden of CRC even further. METHODS: Within a population-based survey of patients with stage III CRC, the authors investigated the effects of disease and treatment on personal finances and computed a composite measure of financial burden. Correlations were examined between components of financial burden and patient-reported postoperative complications using chi-square analyses, and Mantel-Haenszel chi-square tend tests were used to evaluate correlations between composite financial burden scores and surgical complications, controlling for patient characteristics and other factors by using multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS: Among 937 respondents, 224 (24%) reported complications after surgery. Those with complications had significantly higher composite financial burden (P < .001 for trend): they were more likely to spend savings (40% vs 31%; P = .01), borrow or take loans (18% vs 11%; P = .007), fail to make credit card payments (18% vs 11%; P = .005), reduce spending for food or clothes (38% vs 27%; P = .001), and decrease recreational activities (41% vs 33%; P = .03). They took significantly longer to return to work (P = .009) and were more likely to experience significant worry about finances (61% vs 52%; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Complications after surgery for CRC result in significant personal financial consequences as well as morbidity. Financial stress impairs quality of life and may prevent adherence to recommended treatments. Therefore, patients who suffer complications may require not just additional clinical care but also economic support and services. (C) 2014 American Cancer Society.
    Cancer 10/2014; 120(19). DOI:10.1002/cncr.28812 · 4.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Importance Most women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer do not undergo breast reconstruction.Objective To examine correlates of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and to determine if a significant unmet need for reconstruction exists.Design, Setting, and Participants We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries from Los Angeles, California, and Detroit, Michigan, for rapid case ascertainment to identify a sample of women aged 20 to 79 years diagnosed as having ductal carcinoma in situ or stages I to III invasive breast cancer. Black and Latina women were oversampled to ensure adequate representation of racial/ethnic minorities. Eligible participants were able to complete a survey in English or Spanish. Of 3252 women sent the initial survey a median of 9 months after diagnosis, 2290 completed it. Those who remained disease free were surveyed 4 years later to determine the frequency of immediate and delayed reconstruction and patient attitudes toward the procedure; 1536 completed the follow-up survey. The 485 who remained disease free at follow-up underwent analysis.Exposures Disease-free survival of breast cancer.Main Outcomes and Measures Breast reconstruction at any time after mastectomy and patient satisfaction with different aspects of the reconstruction decision-making process.Results Response rates in the initial and follow-up surveys were 73.1% and 67.7%, respectively (overall, 49.4%). Of 485 patients reporting mastectomy at the initial survey and remaining disease free, 24.8% underwent immediate and 16.8% underwent delayed reconstruction (total, 41.6%). Factors significantly associated with not undergoing reconstruction were black race (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.16 [95% CI, 1.11-4.20]; P = .004), lower educational level (AOR, 4.49 [95% CI, 2.31-8.72]; P < .001), increased age (AOR in 10-year increments, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.77-3.61]; P < .001), major comorbidity (AOR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.01-5.11]; P = .048), and chemotherapy (AOR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.99-3.31]; P = .05). Only 13.3% of women were dissatisfied with the reconstruction decision-making process, but dissatisfaction was higher among nonwhite patients in the sample (AOR, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.27-6.51]; P = .03). The most common patient-reported reasons for not having reconstruction were the desire to avoid additional surgery (48.5%) and the belief that it was not important (33.8%), but 36.3% expressed fear of implants. Reasons for avoiding reconstruction and systems barriers to care varied by race; barriers were more common among nonwhite participants. Residual demand for reconstruction at 4 years was low, with only 30 of 263 who did not undergo reconstruction still considering the procedure.Conclusions and Relevance Reconstruction rates largely reflect patient demand; most patients are satisfied with the decision-making process about reconstruction. Specific approaches are needed to address lingering patient-level and system factors with a negative effect on reconstruction among minority women.
    08/2014; 149(10). DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.548

Publication Stats

2k Citations
726.78 Total Impact Points

Institutions

  • 2005–2015
    • University of Michigan
      • • Department of Internal Medicine
      • • Medical School
      • • Division of General Medicine
      Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • 2007–2014
    • Concordia University–Ann Arbor
      Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • 2010
    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
      New York, New York, United States
  • 2009
    • Harvard University
      Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • 2000–2009
    • Baylor College of Medicine
      • Department of Family & Community Medicine
      Houston, Texas, United States
  • 2006–2007
    • Fox Chase Cancer Center
      Filadelfia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 2003
    • Duke University
      Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • 2001
    • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
      North Carolina, United States