Publications (55)140.19 Total impact
-
Article: Comparison of laparoscopic and open intraoperative ultrasonography for staging liver tumours.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver surgery must reproduce open surgical steps. Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) is mandatory, but reliability of laparoscopic IOUS has been poorly evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic versus open IOUS in staging liver tumours. METHODS: All patients scheduled for liver resection between September 2009 and March 2011 were considered. Inclusion criteria were primary and metastatic tumours. Exclusion criteria were: hilar/gallbladder cholangiocarcinoma, ten or more lesions, repeat resection, laparoscopic hepatectomy, adhesions and unresectability. Following percutaneous ultrasonography and thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT), and on indication contrast-enhanced (CE) liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, patients were scheduled for laparoscopy, laparoscopic IOUS, then laparotomy, open IOUS and Partial hepatectomy. Data were collected prospectively. Reference standards were final pathology and 6-month follow-up results. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included, who had a median of 3 preoperative imaging studies (ultrasonography/CT 100 per cent, CE-MRI 67 per cent, PET-CT 54 per cent). A total of 119 lesions were diagnosed. Laparoscopic IOUS detected 22 additional lesions (+18·5 per cent) in 14 patients. Open IOUS detected two additional lesions, but did not confirm four lesions; overall 20 additional lesions (+16·8 per cent) were detected in ten patients. Pathology confirmed 14 newly detected malignant nodules (+11·8 per cent) in eight patients. After 6 months ten new nodules were identified in six patients. The sensitivity of preoperative imaging, laparoscopic IOUS and open IOUS was 83·1, 92·3 and 93·0 per cent respectively; accuracy was 79, 82 and 88 per cent. In comparison with open IOUS, the sensitivity and accuracy of laparoscopic IOUS were 98·6 and 94 per cent. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic IOUS is a reliable tool for staging liver tumours with a performance similar to that of open IOUS in detecting new nodules. Copyright © 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.British Journal of Surgery 01/2013; · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Combined first-stage hepatectomy and colorectal resection in a two-stage hepatectomy strategy for bilobar synchronous liver metastases.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of combined colorectal and hepatic resection as the first step of two-stage hepatectomy in patients with bilobar synchronous colorectal liver metastases. All patients with bilobar synchronous colorectal liver metastases who were considered for two-stage hepatectomy, combining resection of the primary tumour with the first stage of hepatectomy, between 2000 and 2008 were selected from a prospectively collected database at two institutions. Data were analysed retrospectively on an intention-to-treat basis. Thirty-three patients were studied. Twenty patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combined colorectal resection and clearance of left-sided liver metastases was the first-stage procedure in all but one patient, in whom right clearance was performed. In 17 patients right portal vein ligation was undertaken at the same time. No patient died. Two patients had anastomotic leakage. Interval chemotherapy was given to 25 patients, five of whom also had percutaneous portal vein embolization. Twenty-five patients had the second-stage hepatectomy, but not eight patients with disease progression. There was one postoperative death after the second stage, and eight patients experienced morbidity. Median follow-up from the first stage was 28.7 months. Overall and disease-free survival rates for patients who completed the procedure were 80 and 44 per cent respectively at 3 years, and 48 and 22 per cent at 5 years. In patients with bilobar synchronous colorectal liver metastases who are candidates for two-stage hepatectomy, combined resection of the primary tumour and first-stage hepatectomy reduces the number of procedures, optimizes chemotherapy administration and may improve outcome.British Journal of Surgery 09/2010; 97(9):1354-62. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Liver resection of colorectal metastases in elderly patients.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the outcome of liver surgery for colorectal metastases (CLM) in patients over 70 years old in a large international multicentre cohort. Among 7764 patients who had resection of CLM, 999 (12.9 per cent) were aged 70-75 years, 468 (6.0 per cent) were aged 75-80 years and 157 (2.0 per cent) were at least 80 years old. Elderly patients were compared with the younger population. Multinodular and bilateral metastases were less common in elderly than in younger patients (P < 0.001). Preoperative chemotherapy was used less frequently and more limited surgery was performed (P < 0.001). Sixty-day postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 3.8 and 32.3 per cent respectively, compared with 1.6 and 28.7 per cent in younger patients (both P < 0.001). Three-year overall survival was 57.1 per cent in elderly and 60.2 per cent in younger patients (P < 0.001), and was similar among patients aged 70-75, 75-80 or at least 80 years (57.8, 55.3 and 54.1 per cent respectively; P = 0.160). Independent predictors of survival were more than three metastases, bilateral metastases, concomitant extrahepatic disease and no postoperative chemotherapy. Liver resection for CLM in elderly patients can achieve a reasonable 3-year survival rate, with an acceptable morbidity rate. There should be no upper age limit but risk factors may help predict potential benefit.British Journal of Surgery 03/2010; 97(3):366-76. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in adults. Outline of the principal recommendations. National reference guidelines.
Minerva anestesiologica 10/2009; 75(9):543-7, 548-52. · 2.66 Impact Factor -
Article: Low rates of loco-regional recurrence following extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The study by MacDonald et al. [Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 2001;345:725-30] has reported low loco-regional recurrence rates (19%) after gastric cancer resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. However, the lymph node dissection was often "inadequate". The aim of this retrospective study is to analyse if an extended lymph node dissection (D2) without adjuvant radiotherapy may achieve comparable loco-regional recurrence rates. A prospective database of 200 patients who underwent a curative resection for gastric carcinoma from January 2000 to December 2006 was analysed. D2 lymph node dissection was standard. Recurrences were categorized as loco-regional, peritoneal, or distant. No patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1% (2 patients). The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 25.9. Overall and disease-free survival at 5years were 60.7% and 61.2% respectively. During the follow-up, 60 patients (30%) have recurred at 76 sites: 38 (50%) distant metastases, 25 (32.9%) peritoneal metastases, and 13 (17.1%) loco-regional recurrences. The loco-regional recurrence was isolated in 6 patients and associated with peritoneal or distant metastases in 7 patients. The mean time to the first recurrence was 18.9 (95% confidence interval: 15.0-21.9) months. Extended lymph node dissection is safe and warrants low loco-regional recurrence rates.European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 02/2009; 35(6):588-92. · 2.56 Impact Factor -
Article: Liver dysfunction and sepsis determine operative mortality after liver resection.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Liver failure is the principal cause of death after hepatectomy. Its progression towards death and its relationship with sepsis are unclear. This study analysed predictors of mortality in patients with liver dysfunction and the role of sepsis in the death of these patients. The study focused on patients with liver dysfunction, excluding those with vascular thrombosis, after liver resection at one of two centres between 1998 and 2006. Liver dysfunction occurred after 57 (4.5 per cent) of 1271 hepatectomies. Fifty-three patients without vascular thrombosis were included in the analysis, with a mortality rate of 23 per cent. Independent predictors of death were age (odds ratio (OR) 1.18 per year increase; P = 0.017), cirrhosis (OR 54.09; P = 0.004) and postoperative sepsis (OR 37.58; P = 0.005). Sepsis occurred in 15 patients (28 per cent), seven of whom died. Intestinal pathogens were isolated in 12 patients with sepsis. The risk of sepsis was significantly increased in those with surgical complications (11 of 16 versus four of 37; P < 0.001). Sepsis plays a key role in the death of patients with liver dysfunction after hepatectomy. Early recognition and aggressive treatment of sepsis may reduce mortality.British Journal of Surgery 12/2008; 96(1):88-94. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Local surgical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: is there still a place?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In recent decades, surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma has moved toward liver surgery in association with biliary resection in order to increase radicality and to achieve better survival. Results of local resection compared with hepatectomy associated with bile duct resection and its actual indications have to be clarified. A systematic review of relevant studies published before December 2007 was performed. Original published studies comparing the results of isolated local excision with those of hepatectomy associated with bile duct resection were identified and the reported results were synthesized. The pathologic data suggest that isolated bile duct resection cannot be adequate: required wide surgical margins; neoplastic extension along perineural sheaths; Segment 1 neoplastic invasion. Considering postoperative outcomes, in the 1990s, local resection had significantly lower mortality rates than liver resection. In recent years, the short-term results of liver surgery have improved significantly, while mortality rates have decreased. The R0 resection rate is significantly higher after associated liver resection. Comparison of survival results between local resection and associated liver surgery is difficult because, in the majority of series, the treatment was planned according to tumor extension. Better long-term outcomes have been reported after liver resection than after isolated bile duct resection, even for Bismuth-Corlette type I-II cholangiocarcinoma. Long-term survivors after local resection have been reported in a few selected patients with Bismuth-Corlette type I Tis-T1 or papillary neoplasm.HPB 02/2008; 10(3):174-8. · 1.60 Impact Factor -
Article: Liver resection for HCC with cirrhosis: surgical perspectives out of EASL/AASLD guidelines.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: EASL/AASLD guidelines clearly define indications for liver surgery for HCC: patients with single HCC and completely preserved liver function without portal hypertension. These guidelines exclude from operation many patients that could benefit from radical resection and that are daily scheduled for hepatectomy in surgical centers. Patients with large tumors or with portal vein thrombosis cannot be transplanted or treated by interstitial treatments. In selected cases liver resection may obtain good long-term outcomes, significantly better than non-curative therapies. In cases of multinodular HCC, liver transplantation is the treatment of choice within Milan criteria; patients beyond these limits can benefit from liver resection, especially if only two nodules are diagnosed: even if they have a worse prognosis, survival results after liver surgery are better than those reported after TACE or conservative treatments. EASL/AASLD guidelines excluded from operating patients with portal hypertension but data about this topic are not conclusive and further studies are necessary. Selected patients with mild portal hypertension could probably be scheduled for liver resection and, considering the shortage of donors, listing for transplantation could be avoided. In conclusion, guidelines for HCC treatment should consider good results of liver resection for advanced HCC, and indications for hepatectomy should be expanded in order not to exclude from radical therapy patients that could benefit from it.European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 09/2007; 35(1):11-5. · 2.56 Impact Factor -
Article: Prevention of intrahepatic recurrence by adjuvant (131)iodine-labeled lipiodol after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related cirrhosis.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the impact of postoperative injection into the hepatic artery of 131-iodine-labeled lipiodol on disease-free and overall survival rates in patients who underwent liver surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ten consecutive patients with HCV (hepatitis C virus)-related cirrhosis who underwent liver surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were treated with adjuvant injection of 131-iodine-labeled lipiodol. They were matched with 20 HCV-positive cirrhotic controls who underwent liver resection alone; patients were paired in terms of age, Child-Pugh class, tumor size, microscopic vascular invasion, tumor histological pattern, presence of satellite nodules and type of surgical resection. Recurrence was defined as the development of a new hypervascularizated nodule in the liver. No significant differences were found between the two groups in clinical, biologic and histologic characteristics, except a lower platelet count in the control group. None of the treated patients developed an intrahepatic recurrence until the 15th month from liver resection, whereas recurrences occurred in nine of the 20 patients in the control group (p=0.01). From 18 months onwards, recurrences appeared also in the treated patients, and after 36 months of follow-up both recurrence rate and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups. Intrahepatic injection of 131-iodine-labeled lipiodol improves the disease-free survival rate following liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in the short term up to 15 months; this advantage fades, however, away after 36 months.European Journal of Surgical Oncology 03/2007; 33(1):61-6. · 2.50 Impact Factor -
Article: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of advanced synchronous liver metastases before treatment of the colorectal primary (Br J Surg) 2006; 93; 872-878.
British Journal of Surgery 01/2007; 93(12):1564; author reply 1564. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for initially irresectable colorectal liver metastases.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Hepatic surgery is the treatment of choice for resectable colorectal liver metastases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can downstage the tumour and enable surgery in up to 38 per cent of patients whose tumours were initially considered irresectable. This prospective study included 150 patients who underwent hepatic resection over a 4-year period. One hundred and sixteen patients had resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (group 1) and 34 had chemotherapy before liver surgery (group 2). Perioperative features, survival and pattern of recurrence were compared. Median follow-up was 35.1 months. The in-hospital mortality rate was zero. Three-year overall survival in the two groups was comparable (P = 0.232). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 21 per cent in the neoadjuvant group compared with 50.5 per cent in the immediate resection group (P < 0.001). Recurrence rates were 94 per cent (32 of 34) in group 1 and 66.4 per cent in group 2 (P = 0.001); extrahepatic recurrence, alone or associated with recurrence in the liver, was significantly more common in group 2 than in group 1 (78 versus 55 per cent; P = 0.016). Multivariate analysis revealed that resection of the recurrence was the most important independent prognostic factor for improved disease-free survival (relative risk 0.2; P < 0.001). Patients in group 2 had reduced disease-free survival (RR 1.8; P = 0.012). The recurrence rate among patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for initially irresectable liver metastases was extremely high. Re-resection should be attempted whenever feasible.British Journal of Surgery 08/2006; 93(8):1001-6. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Randomized clinical trial of liver resection with and without hepatic pedicle clamping.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcome of liver resection with and without intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping. Between June 2002 and June 2004, 126 consecutive patients with resectable liver tumours were randomized to undergo resection with (63 patients) or without (63 patients) intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping. The transection time was significantly higher in the group without hepatic pedicle clamping. The blood loss per cm(2) was similar in the two groups: 2.7 ml/cm(2) in the group with versus 3.2 ml/cm(2) in group without hepatic pedicle clamping (P = 0.425). In the subset of patients with an abnormal liver, there were no differences in blood loss per transection surface: 3.1 ml/cm(2) in the group with versus 2.9 ml/cm(2) in the group without clamping (P = 0.829). The rate of blood transfusions was not higher in the non-clamping group. No differences were observed in the postoperative liver enzyme serum levels, the in-hospital mortality (one patient in each group) or the number of complications. This study showed clearly that liver resection without hepatic pedicle clamping is safe, even in patients with a diseased liver.British Journal of Surgery 07/2006; 93(6):685-9. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Hepatic bisegmentectomy 7-8 for a colorectal metastasis.
European Journal of Surgical Oncology 06/2006; 32(4):469-71. · 2.50 Impact Factor -
Article: Diagnostic accuracy of portal-phase CT and MRI with mangafodipir trisodium in detecting liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of single section spiral computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with tissue-specific contrast agent mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing surgery for primary and/or metastatic disease were evaluated using CT (5 mm collimation and reconstruction interval, pitch 2), two-dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo (2D FSPGR) T1 and single shot fast-spin echo (SSFSE) T2 weighted breath-hold MRI sequences, performed before and after intravenous administration of MnDPDP. The reference standards were intraoperative ultrasound and histology. The per-patient accuracy of CT was 72.8 versus 78.4% for unenhanced MRI (p = 0.071) and 82.4% for MnDPDP-enhanced MRI (p = 0.005). MnDPDP-enhanced MRI appeared to be more accurate than unenhanced MRI but this was not significant (p = 0.059). The sensitivity of CT was 48.4% versus 58.1% for unenhanced MRI (p = 0.083) and 66.1% for MnDPDP-enhanced MRI (p = 0.004). The difference in specificity between procedures was not significant. The per-lesion sensitivity was 71.7, 74.9 and 82.7% for CT, unenhanced MRI, and MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, respectively; the positive predictive value of the procedures was respectively 84.0, 96.0 and 95.8%. MnDPDP-enhanced MRI provided a high level diagnostic confidence in 92.5% of the cases versus 82.5% for both unenhanced MRI and CT. The kappa value for inter-observer variability was >0.75 for all procedures. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of MnDPDP-enhanced MRI is significantly higher than single section spiral CT in the detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases; no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was observed between unenhanced MRI and MnDPDP-enhanced MRI.Clinical Radiology 05/2006; 61(4):338-47. · 1.95 Impact Factor -
Article: Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: analysis of mortality, morbidity and survival--a European single center experience.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate short- and long-term results of liver resections and prognostic factors in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. A single-unit, retrospective study analyzing 216 patients with histologically confirmed cirrhosis who underwent hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. All clinico-pathologic and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Child A patients had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate compared to Child B-C: 4.7 vs 21.3% (p=0.0003). Overall morbidity rate was 38.4%; multiple logistic regression analysis identified liver function, hepatic pedicle clamping time, number of nodes and transfusion rate as independent predictors for post-operative complications. Overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates were 34.1 and 25.2%. Multivariate analysis showed that Child A, radical resection, tumour size < or =5 cm and, absence of vascular invasion were independent prognostic factors for long-term survival. No significant differences in overall and disease-free survival were found according to the type of resection (anatomic vs non-anatomic). Patients with preserved liver function and small-size, single-node hepatocellular carcinomas are the best candidates for hepatic resection.European Journal of Surgical Oncology 12/2005; 31(9):986-93. · 2.50 Impact Factor -
Article: Phase II trial of primary radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Primary chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) may improve local control, curative resection rate and long-term survival. We performed a phase II study to evaluate toxicity and activity of primary radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) twice weekly in patients (pts) with LAPC. From 6/1999 to 6/2003, 23 LAPC pts received GEM 100 mg/m2 twice weekly in the first 15 pts and 50 mg/m2 in the last 8 pts, concurrently with radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day for a total dose of 45 Gy). The treatment was completed in 19/23 pts. Toxicities: G3-4 hematological toxicity occurred in 35 and 4% respectively; G3 nausea and vomiting and gastrointestinal toxicity in 30%. Clinical benefit was found in 10/18 pts (55%). Overall response: partial response rate 4/18 (22%); stable disease 13/18 (72%); progressive disease 1/18 (6%). Six pts underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (5/6 pts pT3, 1/6 pts microscopic cancer foci, 1/6 N+, 5/6 negative retroperitoneal margin). MEDIAN SURVIVAL: 14 months for the entire group, 12 months for unresected pts, 20 months for resected pts. The treatment with GEM twice weekly at 50 mg/m2 associated with radiotherapy (45 Gy) is feasible and permits to obtain clinical benefit in a good percentage of pts. Objective response, median survival, and local and systemic control are similar to other studies and need further improvement.Oncology 02/2005; 68(4-6):493-9. · 2.27 Impact Factor -
Article: Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer: results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Several studies reporting preliminary long-term survival data after laparoscopic resections for colonic adenocarcinoma did not show any detrimental effect in comparison with historic studies of laparotomies. A previous randomized study has reported an unforeseen better long-term survival for node-positive patients treated by laparoscopic colectomy. A single-institution prospective nonrandomized trial compared short- and long-term results of laparoscopic and open curative resection for adenocarcinoma of the left colon or rectum in 255 consecutive patients from January 1996 to December 2000. In this study, 34 left hemicolectomy, 202 anterior resections, and 19 abdominoperineal resections were performed. A total of 74 patients underwent a laparoscopic resection (LR), and 181, an open resection (OR). The tumor site was the descending colon in 32 cases, the sigmoid colon in 98 cases, and the rectum in 125 cases, including 87 mid-low rectal cancers. Ten LR procedures (13.5%) were converted to open surgery. The hospital mortality was 0.08%, and in hospital morbidity was 16.2% for LR and 13.3% for OR (p = 0.56). The median postoperative stay was 1 day shorter for LR (9 days) than for OR (10 days) (p = 0.09). The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved were 13.8 +/- 5.7 for OR and 12.7 +/- 5; for LR (p = 0.23). Age exceeding 70 years, T stage, N stage, grading, mid-low rectal site, and laparoscopy were found by multivariate analysis to be significant prognostic factors for disease-free and cancer-related survival. When patients were stratified by stage, a trend toward a better disease-free and cancer-related survival was identified in stage III patients undergoing LR. Laparoscopic colonic resection is a safe procedure in terms of postoperative outcome and long-term survival. Multivariate analysis showed that laparoscopy is a positive prognostic factor for disease-free and cancer-related survival. The current data agrees with the data for the only randomized study reported so far. Both suggest a better outcome for node-positive patients treated by laparoscopy.Surgical Endoscopy 08/2004; 18(7):1130-5. · 4.01 Impact Factor -
Article: Prospective randomized study of steroids in the prevention of ischaemic injury during hepatic resection with pedicle clamping.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The major drawback of hepatic pedicle clamping is ischaemia-reperfusion injury with impairment of liver function. Perioperative steroid administration has been advocated to reduce liver damage. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to determine whether steroid administration can reduce liver injury and improve short-term outcome. Fifty-three patients undergoing liver resection were randomized to a steroid group (group 1) or to a control group (group 2); patients in group 1 received methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg 30 min before liver resection whereas those in group 2 did not. Serum levels of interleukin (IL) 6, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and prothrombin time (PT) were measured. Length of stay, and type and number of complications were recorded. Serum IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the steroid group than in the control group 24 h after surgery. Steroid administration significantly modified AST, ALT and PT levels only in patients with chronic liver disease. Overall and lung-related morbidity were not significantly different between the two groups. Steroid administration suppresses serum IL-6 levels, but has no effect on short-term outcome.British Journal of Surgery 02/2003; 90(1):17-22. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Outcome of surgical treatment for chronic calcifying pancreatitis.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the short and long-term results of surgical treatment of calcifying chronic pancreatitis in our center. We studied 55 consecutive patients operated on for chronic calcifying pancreatitis during a period of 12 years. The mean follow-up period was 6.2 years. Main outcome measures were operative mortality and morbidity, degree of pain control, diabetes onset, survival, and causes of death. The etiology was alcoholic in 48 patients and idiopathic in seven patients. A resection was performed in 78% of cases and a by-pass procedure was performed in 22%. Operative mortality was 3.6%; morbidity was 21.8%. A ductal adenocarcinoma was found in 3.6% of cases. The alcohol withdrawal rate was 78%. Complete pain control was achieved in 71.4% of the patients. Among diabetes, cirrhosis, type of surgery, smoking and alcohol abuse history, only alcohol withdrawal was associated with pain control (p < 0.03). A late reintervention was needed in only one patient in the by-pass group. Five and 10-year survival rates for the entire population were 80% and 61%, respectively. Among alcohol, cirrhosis, diabetes, and type of surgery, only the former was associated with survival (p < 0.003). Five-year actuarial survival was 55.6% for patients who continued drinking compared with 86.3% for ex-alcoholics. Surgical resection should be performed when required by the anatomical conditions because it was associated with good long-term pain control and low postoperative and late morbidity. Alcohol withdrawal has a key role for effective control of pain and prolonged survival.Pancreas 05/2001; 22(4):378-82. · 2.39 Impact Factor -
Article: Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A worthwhile operation?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: After curative resection of hepatic colorectal metastases, 10-20% of patients experience a resectable hepatic recurrence. We wanted to assess the expected risk-to-benefit ratio in comparison to first hepatectomy and to determine the prognostic factors associated with survival. Twenty-nine patients from a group of 152 patients resected for colorectal liver metastases underwent 32 repeat hepatectomies. In-hospital mortality was 3.5% (1/29 patients); the morbidity after repeat hepatectomy was lower than that after first hepatic resection. Combined extrahepatic surgery was performed on 34.5% of repeat hepatectomies vs. 6.9% of first hepatectomies (P = 0.01). Overall actuarial 3-year survival was 35.1%: four patients have survived more than 3 years and one survived for more than 5 years. The number of hepatic metastases and the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum levels were significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis. The synchronous resection of hepatic and extrahepatic disease was not associated with a lower survival rate when compared with that of patients without extrahepatic localization: three patients of the former group are alive and disease-free at more than 2 years. Repeat hepatic resection can provide long-term survival rates similar to those of first liver resection, with comparable mortality and morbidity. The presence of resectable extrahepatic disease must not be an absolute contraindication to synchronous hepatectomy because long-term survival is possible.Journal of Surgical Oncology 03/2001; 76(2):127-32. · 2.10 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
Institutions
-
1990–2013
-
Ospedale Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Umberto I
Torino, Piedmont, Italy
-
-
2006–2009
-
Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment
Torino, Piedmont, Italy
-
