-
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 02/2008; 36(1 Suppl):23-7. · 1.22 Impact Factor
-
Robert M Pestronk, Brian Kamoie,
David Fidler,
Gene Matthews,
Georges C Benjamin,
Ralph T Bryan,
Socrates H Tuch,
Richard Gottfried,
Jonathan E Fielding,
Fran Schmitz,
Stephen Redd
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 02/2008; 36(1 Suppl):47-51. · 1.22 Impact Factor
-
Brian Kamoie
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This Article provides a detailed overview of the new National Response Plan (NRP) with a focus on its applicability to bioterrorism and other public health emergencies. The Article highlights critical policy and legal issues left unresolved by the NRP, and offers recommendations for the resolution of those issues. The author concludes that, although the NRP is not perfect, it represents a major advance in domestic incident management and provides regular opportunities for review and revision as we learn how to best coordinate the national response to major incidents. A close working relationship between the Departments of Health and Human Services and Homeland Security should enable a unified response to bioterrorism and other public health emergencies in support of state and local efforts.
Journal of health law 02/2005; 38(2):287-318.
-
Brian Kamoie
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) in 1986 to prohibit patient dumping. Subsequent to its passage, however, issues concerning the application of EMTALA have vexed hospitals, patients, regulators, and courts. In an attempt to clarify these issues, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently promulgated new EMTALA regulations. This Article reviews the basic requirements of EMTALA and highlights the statutory definitions critical to its proper interpretation and application. The article then analyzes the impact of the new regulations, particularly in five major areas: where and when the statute applies, on-call physician requirements, hospital-owned ambulances, managed care, and bioterrorism. It concludes with a discussion of the implications of the new regulations for hospitals and their counsel.
Journal of health law 01/2004; 37(1):41-60.
-
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 02/2003; 31(4):590-601. · 1.22 Impact Factor
-
Brian Kamoie
Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy). 01/2003;
-
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 02/2002; 30(2):191-200. · 1.22 Impact Factor
-
Heather Horton,
Guthrie S Birkhead,
Christine Bump,
Scott Burris,
Kathy Cahill,
Richard A Goodman, Brian Kamoie,
Paula Kocher,
Zita Lazzarini,
Karen McKie,
Anthony D Moulton,
Montrece McNeill Ransom,
Frederic E Shaw,
Barbara Silverstein,
Jon S Vernick
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Applied public health law research is an essential element for improving the legal foundation of public health practice. This article focuses on the proper scope and the methodology related to conducting public health law research. In addition to considering the issue of translating research into practice, the article provides overviews of three current public health law research projects and the lessons they provide for researchers.
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 02/2002; 30(3 Suppl):197-201. · 1.22 Impact Factor
-
Brian Kamoie
Public Health Reports 120(5):571-3. · 1.27 Impact Factor
-
Public Health Reports 118(4):379-81. · 1.27 Impact Factor
-
Public Health Reports 119(2):216-9. · 1.27 Impact Factor
