Dennis T Ko

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Are you Dennis T Ko?

Claim your profile

Publications (125)1187.01 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: -Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with a poor prognosis and poses a significant burden to the health care system, but few studies have evaluated whether OHCA incidence and survival have changed over time.
    Circulation 11/2014; · 15.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relationship between appropriateness score, treatment strategy and quality of life (QOL) among patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is not known. In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated changes in generic and cardiac-specific quality of life in patients with documented SIHD, comparing patients with revascularization versus those with medical therapy alone, stratified by their appropriateness scores.
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 10/2014; 14(1):137. · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wide variation exists in the detection rate of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with elective coronary angiography for suspected stable ischemic heart disease. We sought to understand the incremental impact of nonclinical factors on this variation.
    Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 09/2014; · 5.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Extensive research has demonstrated the importance of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in predicting acute coronary events. Our main objective was to evaluate the relationship between traditional risk factors and the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), and to explore potential differences in men versus women. Methods An observational study was conducted in a population-based cohort of stable patients who underwent cardiac catheterization in Ontario, Canada. We examined the relationship of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoking with the presence of obstructive CAD in men and women using multivariable logistic regression models. Results Of the 46,490 patients who were included in our study, 61.2% were men and 38.8% were women. We found that 97% of patients with obstructive CAD had at least one conventional cardiovascular risk factor. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) for obstructive CAD in women with diabetes (OR 1.51), hypertension (OR 1.38), and smoking (OR 1.39) were statistically significantly higher than in men (OR 1.20 for diabetes, OR 1.08 for hypertension, OR 1.14 for smoking, P < 0.001). The sex difference was even greater for patients with multiple risk factors. For example, the association with obstructive CAD in women with four cardiac risk factors (OR 4.30;95%CI 3.49-5.28) was almost doubled when compared to men (OR 2.26;95%CI 1.99-2.57, P < 0.001). Conclusions Almost all patients with stable CAD undergoing cardiac catheterization had at least one traditional cardiac risk factor. Importantly, the association between multiple cardiac risk factors and the presence of obstructive CAD is substantially stronger in women than men.
    The Canadian journal of cardiology 07/2014; · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Higher-risk patients may not receive evidence-based therapy because of limited life expectancy, which is a composite measure that encompasses many patient factors, including age, frailty, and comorbidities. In this study, we evaluated the extent to which treatment care gaps can be explained by a difference in projected life expectancy.
    Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 06/2014; · 5.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ezetimibe use has steadily increased in Canada during the past decade even in the absence of evidence demonstrating a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes. Among the 4 most populated provinces in Canada, there is a gradient in the restrictiveness of ezetimibe in public-funded formularies (most to least strict: British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec, and Ontario). The effect of formulary policy on the use of ezetimibe over time is unknown.
    Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 06/2014; · 5.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We previously found that the use of ezetimibe increased rapidly with different patterns between the United States (US) and Canada prior to the landmark Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Hypercholesterolemia Enhance Atherosclerosis Regression (ENHANCE) trial, which was reported in January 2008, and failed to show that the drug slowed the progression of atherosclerosis. What is not known is how practice in the 2 countries changed after the ENHANCE trial. We examined ezetimibe use trends in the US and Canada before and after the reporting of the ENHANCE trial. We conducted a population-based, retrospective, time-series analysis using the data collected by IMS Health in the US and CompuScript in Canada from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2009. The main outcome measure was monthly number of prescriptions for ezetimibe-containing products. The monthly number of ezetimibe prescriptions/100,000 population rose from 6 to 1,082 in the US from November 2002 to January 2008, then significantly declined to 572/100,000 population by December 2009 after the release of the ENHANCE trial, a decrease of 47.1% (P < .001). In contrast, in Canada, use continuously rose from 2 to 495/100,000 population from June 2003 to December 2009 (P = .2). United States expenditures totaled $2.24 billion in 2009. Ezetimibe remains commonly used in both the US and Canada. Ezetimibe use has decreased in the US post-ENHANCE, whereas use has gradually but steadily increased in Canada. The diverging patterns of ezetimibe use in the US and Canada require further investigation, as they reveal that a common evidence base is eliciting very different utilization patterns in neighboring countries.
    American heart journal 05/2014; 167(5):683-9. · 4.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Randomized studies have shown optimal medical therapy to be as efficacious as revascularization in stable ischemic heart disease (IHD). It is not known if these efficacy results are reflected by real-world effectiveness. To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of routine medical therapy versus revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in stable IHD. Observational cohort study. Stable IHD patients from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2011, identified using a Registry of all angiography patients in Ontario, Canada. Revascularization, defined as PCI/CABG within 90 days after index angiography. Death, myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat PCI/CABG. Revascularization was compared to medical therapy using a) multivariable Cox-proportional hazard models with therapy strategy treated as a time-varying covariate; and b) a propensity score matched analysis. Post-angiography medication use was determined. We identified 39,131 stable IHD patients, of whom 15,139 were treated medically, and 23,992 were revascularized (PCI = 15,604; CABG = 8,388). Mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Revascularization was associated with fewer deaths (HR 0.76; 95 % CI 0.68-0.84; p < 0.001) ,MIs (HR 0.78; 95 % CI 0.72-0.85; p < 0.001) and repeat PCI/CABG (HR 0.59; 95 % CI 0.50-0.70; p < 0.001) than medical therapy. In the propensity-matched analysis of 12,362 well-matched pairs of revascularized and medical therapy patients, fewer deaths (8.6 % vs 12.7 %; HR 0.75; 95 % CI 0.69-0.81; p < 0.001) , MIs (11.7 % vs 14.4 %; HR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.77-0.93 p < 0.001) and repeat PCI/CABG ( 17.4 % vs 24.1 %;HR 0.67; 95 % 0.63-0.71; p < 0.001) occurred in revascularized patients, over the 4.1 years of follow-up. The revascularization patients had higher uptake of clopidogrel (70.3 % vs 27.2 %; p < 0.001), β-blockers (78.2 % vs 76.7 %; p = 0.010), and statins (94.7 % vs 91.5 %, p < 0.001) in the 1-year post-angiogram. Stable IHD patients treated with revascularization had improved risk-adjusted outcomes in clinical practice, potentially due to under-treatment of medical therapy patients.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 03/2014; · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although multidisciplinary heart failure (HF) clinics are efficacious, it is not known how patient factors or HF clinic structural indicators and process measures have an impact on the cumulative health care costs. In this retrospective cohort study using administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, we identified 1216 HF patients discharged alive after an acute care hospitalization in 2006 and treated at a HF clinic. The primary outcome was the cumulative 1-year health care costs. A hierarchical generalized linear model with a logarithmic link and gamma distribution was developed to determine patient-level and clinic-level predictors of cost. The mean 1-year cost was $27,809 (range, $69 to $343,743). There was a 7-fold variation in the mean costs by clinic, from $14,670 to $96,524. Delays in being seen at a HF clinic were a significant patient-level predictor of costs (rate ratio 1.0015 per day; P<0.001). Being treated at a clinic with >3 physicians was associated with lower costs (rate ratio 0.78; P=0.035). Unmeasured patient-level differences accounted for 97.4% of the between-patient variations in cost. The between-clinic variation in costs decreased by 16.3% when patient-level factors were accounted for; it decreased by a further 49.8% when clinic-level factors were added. From a policy perspective, the wide spectrum of HF clinic structure translates to inefficient care. Greater guidance as to the type of patient seen at a HF clinic, the timeliness of the initial visit, and the most appropriate structure of the HF clinics may potentially result in more cost-effective care.
    Medical care 03/2014; 52(3):272-9. · 3.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aims: Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) treatment strategy and quality of life improvements. Methods and results: This multicentre prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive CTO patients undergoing a non-urgent coronary angiogram who completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and EQ-5D at baseline and at one year. Strategies were: i) medical therapy, ii) PCI to non-CTO, iii) PCI to CTO, and iv) CABG. Multivariable regression models compared quality of life changes over time among strategies, accounting for repeat measures per patient. In our cohort of 387 patients, 154 underwent medical therapy, 83 had PCI to the non-CTO artery, 104 underwent CABG, and 46 underwent PCI to the CTO. Medically treated patients had no improvement on any SAQ domains. Patients with revascularisation of the CTO territory with either PCI or CABG had significant improvements in the physical limitation (PCI to CTO 60.5-76.4; CABG 61.6-80.1; p<0.001), angina frequency (PCI to CTO 79.0-92.7; CABG 82.1-97.9; p<0.001), and disease perception (PCI to CTO 50.5-75.0; CABG 50.2-80.0; p<0.001) domains. In non-CTO PCI patients, improvement was restricted to the angina frequency (82.8-93.3; p<0.001), and disease perception (53.8-71.4; p<0.001) domains. Conclusions: CTO territory revascularisation was associated with quality of life improvements.
    EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 02/2014; 9(10):1165-72. · 3.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe rates and risk factors for prolonged postoperative use of opioids in patients who had not previously used opioids and undergoing major elective surgery. Population based retrospective cohort study. Acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2010. 39 140 opioid naïve patients aged 66 years or older who had major elective surgery, including cardiac, intrathoracic, intra-abdominal, and pelvic procedures. Prolonged opioid use after discharge, as defined by ongoing outpatient prescriptions for opioids for more than 90 days after surgery. Of the 39 140 patients in the entire cohort, 49.2% (n=19 256) were discharged from hospital with an opioid prescription, and 3.1% (n=1229) continued to receive opioids for more than 90 days after surgery. Following risk adjustment with multivariable logistic regression modelling, patient related factors associated with significantly higher risks of prolonged opioid use included younger age, lower household income, specific comorbidities (diabetes, heart failure, pulmonary disease), and use of specific drugs preoperatively (benzodiazepines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors). The type of surgical procedure was also highly associated with prolonged opioid use. Compared with open radical prostatectomies, both open and minimally invasive thoracic procedures were associated with significantly higher risks (odds ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 2.03 to 3.28 and 1.95 1.36 to 2.78, respectively). Conversely, open and minimally invasive major gynaecological procedures were associated with significantly lower risks (0.73, 0.55 to 0.98 and 0.45, 0.33 to 0.62, respectively). Approximately 3% of previously opioid naïve patients continued to use opioids for more than 90 days after major elective surgery. Specific patient and surgical characteristics were associated with the development of prolonged postoperative use of opioids. Our findings can help better inform understanding about the long term risks of opioid treatment for acute postoperative pain and define patient subgroups that warrant interventions to prevent progression to prolonged postoperative opioid use.
    BMJ (online) 02/2014; 348:g1251. · 17.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Mony Shuvy, Dennis T Ko
    Open heart. 02/2014; 1(1):e000036.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical guidelines emphasize medical therapy as the initial approach to the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the extent to which medical therapy is applied before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary clinical practice is uncertain. We evaluated medication use for patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI, and assessed whether the COURAGE study altered medication use in the Canadian healthcare system.
    The Canadian journal of cardiology 01/2014; 3(4). · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department (ED), however there is a paucity of data evaluating the impact of physician follow-up and subsequent management. To evaluate the impact of physician follow-up for low risk chest pain patients after ED assessment. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study of low risk chest pain patients who were assessed and discharged home from an Ontario ED. Low risk was defined as ≥50 years of age, and no diabetes or pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Follow-up within 30 days was stratified as: a) no-physician, b) primary care physician (PCP) alone, c) PCP with cardiologist, and d) cardiologist alone. The primary outcome was death or myocardial infarction (MI) at one-year. Results Among 216,527 patients, 29% had no-physician, 60% had PCP alone, 8% had PCP with cardiologist, and 4% had cardiologist alone follow-up after ED discharge. The mean age of the study cohort was 64.2 years and 42% of the patients were male. After adjusting for important differences in baseline characteristics between physician follow-up groups, the adjusted hazard ratios for death or MI were 1.07 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.14) for the PCP group, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91) for the PCP with cardiologist group, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.02) for the cardiologist alone group, as compared to patients who had no follow-up. Conclusion In this cohort of low risk patients who presented to an ED with chest pain, follow up with a PCP and cardiologist was associated with significantly reduced risk of death or MI at one-year.
    The Canadian journal of cardiology 01/2014; · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background There is increasing demand for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as the primary treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are high risk surgical candidates or inoperable. We used mathematical simulation models to estimate the hypothetical effectiveness of TAVR with increasing wait-times. Methods We applied discrete event modelling, using data from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trials. We compared TAVR to medical therapy in the inoperable cohort, and compared TAVR to conventional aortic valve surgery in the high risk cohort. One-year mortality and wait-time deaths were calculated in different scenarios by varying TAVR wait-times from 10 days to 180 days, while maintaining a constant wait-time for surgery at a mean of 15.6 days Results In the inoperable cohort, the 1-year mortality for medical therapy was 50%. When the TAVR wait-time was 10 days, the TAVR wait-time mortality was 1.9% with a 1 year mortality of 31.5%. TAVR wait-time deaths increased to 28.9% with a 180-day wait, with a 1-year mortality of 41.4%. In the high risk cohort, the wait-time deaths and 1-year mortality for the surgical patients were 2.5% and 27% respectively. The TAVR wait-time deaths increased from 2.2% with a 10-day wait to 22.4% with a 180-day wait, and a corresponding increase in 1-year mortality from 24.5% to 32.6%. Mortality with TAVR exceeded surgery when TAVR wait-times exceeded 60 days. Conclusion Modest increases in TAVR wait-times have substantial impact on the effectiveness of TAVR in both inoperable patients and high risk surgical candidates.
    The Canadian journal of cardiology 01/2014; · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Canadians of Chinese descent, represent one of the fastest growing visible minority groups in Canada, (as well as the second largest), but relatively little is known about the clinical features of heart failure (HF) in Chinese-Canadian versus non-Chinese Canadian patients. We conducted a population-based analysis of urban patients hospitalized in Ontario, Canada for the first time with a most responsible diagnosis of HF between April 1, 1995 and March 31, 2008. Among the 99,278 patients, 1,339 (1.3%) were classified as Chinese using a previously validated list of Chinese surnames. Through linkage to other administrative databases, we compared the clinical characteristics, pharmacological management, and outcomes of Chinese versus non-Chinese HF patients. Ischemic heart disease was identified as the possible etiology of HF in a greater proportion of non-Chinese patients (47.7% vs. 35.3%; p < 0.001) whereas hypertension (26.1% vs. 16.1%; p < 0.001) and valvular heart disease (11.6% vs. 7.2%; p < 0.001) were relatively more common in Chinese patients. Chinese patients were prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors less frequently (57.5% vs. 66.4%, p < 0.001) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) more frequently (17.4% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001) compared to non-Chinese patients. They were also less likely to be adherent to ACE inhibitors over a 1-year follow up period. However, the 1-year case-fatality rates were comparable between the Chinese (31.7%) and non-Chinese (30.2%) subjects (p = 0.24). There are important differences in the causes and medical management of HF in Chinese and non-Chinese patients residing in Canada. Despite these differences, the long-term outcomes of HF patients were similar.
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 12/2013; 13(1):114. · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IMPORTANCE Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death globally. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are the revascularization options for ischemic heart disease. However, the choice of the most appropriate revascularization modality is controversial in some patient subgroups. OBJECTIVE To summarize the current evidence comparing the effectiveness of CABG surgery and PCI in patients with unprotected left main disease (ULMD, in which there is >50% left main coronary stenosis without protective bypass grafts), multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes, or left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). EVIDENCE REVIEW A search of OvidSP MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases between January 2007 and June 2013, limited to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analysis of trials and/or observational studies comparing CABG surgery with PCI was performed. Bibliographies of relevant studies were also searched. Mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization) were reported wherever possible. FINDINGS Thirteen RCTs and 5 meta-analyses were included. CABG surgery should be recommended in patients with ULMD, multivessel CAD, or LVD, if the severity of coronary disease is deemed to be complex (SYNTAX >22) due to lower cardiac events associated with CABG surgery. In cases in which coronary disease is less complex (SYNTAX ≤22) and/or the patient is a higher surgical risk, PCI should be considered. For patients with diabetes and multivessel CAD, CABG surgery should be recommended as standard therapy irrespective of the severity of coronary anatomy, given improved long-term survival and lower cardiac events (5-year MACCE, 18.7% for CABG surgery vs 26.6% for PCI; P = .005). Overall, the incidence of repeat revascularization is higher after PCI, whereas stroke is higher after CABG surgery. Current literature emphasizes the importance of a heart-team approach that should consider coronary anatomy, patient characteristics, and local expertise in revascularization options. Literature pertaining to revascularization options in LVD is scarce predominantly due to LVD being an exclusion factor in most studies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Both CABG surgery and PCI are reasonable options for patients with advanced CAD. Patients with diabetes generally have better outcomes with CABG surgery than PCI. In cases of ULMD, multivessel CAD, or LVD, CABG surgery should be favored in patients with complex coronary lesions and anatomy and PCI in less complicated coronary disease or deemed a high surgical risk. A heart-team approach should evaluate coronary disease complexity, patient comorbidities, patient preferences, and local expertise.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 11/2013; 310(19):2086-95. · 29.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rate of conversion of abstracts presented at scientific meetings into peer-reviewed published manuscripts is an important metric for medical societies, because it facilitates translation of scientific knowledge into practice. We determined the rate and predictors of conversion of scientific abstracts presented at the Canadian Cardiovascular Congress (CCC) from 2006 to 2010 into peer-reviewed article publications within 2 years of their initial presentation. Using a previously validated computer algorithm, we searched the International Statistical Institute Web of Science to identify peer-reviewed full manuscript publications of these abstracts. A multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with successful publication. From 2006 to 2010, 3565 abstracts were presented at the CCC. Overall 24.1% of presented abstracts were published within 2 years of the conference. Mean impact factor for publications was 5.2 (range, 0.4-53.2). The type of presentation (for poster vs oral; odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.83; P < 0.001) and category of presentation (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with successful publication. Late breaking abstracts and those related to cancer and clinical sciences were more likely to be published, compared with prevention, vascular biology, and pediatrics. In conclusion, the publication rate at the CCC is only marginally lower than that reported for large international North American and European cardiology conferences (30.6%). Efforts should focus on several identified barriers to improve conversion of abstracts to full report publication.
    The Canadian journal of cardiology 11/2013; 29(11):1520-3. · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although practice guidelines recommend that perioperative β-blockade be initiated at least several days to weeks before noncardiac surgery is performed, the minimum required period of preoperative therapy is unclear. Population-based administrative databases were used to conduct a cohort study of 48,103 patients aged ≥ 66 years who underwent major elective noncardiac surgery in Ontario, Canada and received preoperative β-blocker therapy. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the association of duration of preoperative β-blocker treatment (classified as 1-7 days, 8-30 days, and ≥ 31 days) with 30-day mortality, 30-day myocardial infarction (MI), 30-day ischemic stroke, and 1-year mortality. The duration of preoperative β-blocker treatment was 1-7 days in 1105 patients (2.3%), 8-30 days in 2639 patients (5.5%), and ≥ 31 days in 44,269 patients (92.0%). Compared with ≥ 31 days of preoperative therapy, 1-7 days of therapy was associated with increased 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.16; P = 0.03], whereas 8-30 days of therapy was not (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69-1.31; P = 0.77). One to 7 days of preoperative therapy was not significantly associated with 1-year mortality (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84-1.35; P = 0.62), 30-day MI (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.92-1.71; P = 0.15), or 30-day ischemic stroke (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.64-2.94; P = 0.41). Initiation of β-blocker therapy 1-7 days before noncardiac surgery is associated with increased 30-day mortality. The findings merit further evaluation by randomized trials.
    The Canadian journal of cardiology 10/2013; · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: There is increasing demand for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as the primary treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are high risk surgical candidates or inoperable. TAVR is typically limited to centers of excellence with restricted capacity, thereby causing prolonged wait-times. Our objective was to use mathematical simulation models to estimate the hypothetical effectiveness of TAVR with increasing wait-times, when compared to either conservative medical therapy in inoperable candidates or conventional surgical aortic valve surgery in high risk candidates. Methods: We developed a fully probabilistic discrete event model, using input data from the randomized controlled Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trials. We evaluated two populations separately: a) in the high risk surgical cohort, we compared TAVR to conventional aortic valve surgery; b) in the inoperable cohort, we compared TAVR to conservative medical therapy. We evaluated 7 scenarios with hypothetical TAVR wait-times ranging from 10 days to 180 days. The main outcome was 1-year mortality and wait-time deaths. Results: In the inoperable cohort, the mean 1-year mortality for the conservative medical therapy arm was approximately 50%. When the TAVR wait-time was 10 days, the mean TAVR wait-time mortality was 1.9% with a 1 year mortality of 31.5%. Mean TAVR wait-time deaths increased to 28.9% with a 180-day wait, with a corresponding mean 1-year mortality of 41.4%. In the high risk cohort, the wait-time deaths and mean 1-year mortality for the surgical patients were 2.5% and 27% respectively in all scenarios. The TAVR wait-time deaths increased from 2.2% at a 10-day wait to 22.4% at a 180-day wait, with a corresponding increase in 1-year mortality from 24.5% to 32.6%. The 1-year mortality in the TAVR group exceeded that in the surgical group at wait-times greater than 60 days. Conclusion: We found that modest increases in TAVR wait-times would have substantial impact on the effectiveness of TAVR in both inoperable patients and high risk surgical candidates. In the high-risk surgical candidates, at wait-times beyond 60 days, TAVR was less effective on average compared to conventional surgery. Our results highlight the importance of aggressive wait-time management for TAVR in severe AS.
    The 35th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making; 10/2013

Publication Stats

2k Citations
1,187.01 Total Impact Points

Institutions

  • 2006–2014
    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
      Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • University of Western Australia
      • School of Population Health
      Perth City, Western Australia, Australia
  • 2005–2014
    • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
      • • Division of Cardiology
      • • Department of Medicine
      Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2004–2014
    • University of Toronto
      • • Division of Cardiac Surgery
      • • Division of Cardiology
      • • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
      Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2011
    • Western University of Health Sciences
      • College of Pharmacy
      Pomona, CA, United States
    • The University of Chicago Medical Center
      Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • 2010
    • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
      Manhattan, New York, United States
  • 2006–2010
    • McMaster University
      • Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine
      Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • 2008
    • University Health Network
      Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2002–2007
    • Yale University
      • Section of Cardiovascular Medicine
      New Haven, CT, United States
  • 2004–2005
    • The Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics
      Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2002–2004
    • Yale-New Haven Hospital
      • Department of Laboratory Medicine
      New Haven, Connecticut, United States