Publications (6)27.42 Total impact
-
Article: Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring admission to intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer admitted to several intensive care units. Knowledge on patients with cancer requiring intensive care is mostly restricted to single-center studies. : Prospective, multicenter, cohort study. Intensive care units from 28 hospitals in Brazil. A total of 717 consecutive patients included over a 2-mo period. None. There were 667 (93%) patients with solid tumors and 50 (7%) patients had hematologic malignancies. The main reasons for intensive care unit admission were postoperative care (57%), sepsis (15%), and respiratory failure (10%). Overall hospital mortality rate was 30% and was higher in patients admitted because of medical complications (58%) than in emergency (37%) and scheduled (11%) surgical patients (p < .001). Adjusting for covariates other than the type of admission, the number of hospital days before intensive care unit admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.37), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34), poor performance status (OR, 3.40; 95% CI, 2.19 -5.26), the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.51-3.87), and active underlying malignancy in recurrence or progression (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.51-3.87) were associated with increased hospital mortality in multivariate analysis. This large multicenter study reports encouraging survival rates for patients with cancer requiring intensive care. In these patients, mortality was mostly dependent on the severity of organ failures, performance status, and need for mechanical ventilation rather than cancer-related characteristics, such as the type of malignancy or the presence of neutropenia.Critical care medicine 10/2009; 38(1):9-15. · 6.37 Impact Factor -
Article: The role of corticosteroids in severe community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review.
Critical care (London, England) 12/2008; 12(6):434. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Surviving sepsis campaign: a critical reappraisal.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In 2002, the declaration of Barcelona launched a worldwide campaign that proposed to decrease in sepsis-related mortality by the introduction of evidence-based medicine into the management of sepsis. This paved the way for the publication of a wide selection of recommendations entitled the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Guidelines. Whereas most of the medical community received the guidelines with enthusiasm, dissonant voices were made public just after its publication, and in recent years, the SSC guidelines were a source of intense debate, resulting in a recent revision of the guidelines. In the midst of a large controversy, it is evident that a critical reappraisal of the SSC guidelines is timely. In our opinion, whereas many relevant aspects of the SSC guidelines have been discussed, there are three major limitations that deserve a closer look, and they are sepsis as a public health issue, the weight of the evidence behind the recommendations, and the absence of recommendations related to the prevention of sepsis. In conclusion, although we recognize that the SSC is a valuable initiative, many of its present aspects must be revised to provide a clear message for clinicians taking care of sepsis patients at bedside. New guidelines should be based on solid evidence, have no interference from the pharmaceutical or medical equipment industry, and should have a stronger preventive and public health approach.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) 09/2008; 30 Suppl 1:70-2. · 2.87 Impact Factor -
Article: Comparative effects of vaporized perfluorohexane and partial liquid ventilation in oleic acid-induced lung injury.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is currently not known whether vaporized perfluorohexane is superior to partial liquid ventilation (PLV) for therapy of acute lung injury. In this study, the authors compared the effects of both therapies in oleic acid-induced lung injury. Lung injury was induced in 30 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs by means of central venous infusion of oleic acid. Animals were assigned to one of the following groups: (1) control or gas ventilation (GV), (2) 2.5% perfluorohexane vapor, (3) 5% perfluorohexane vapor, (4) 10% perfluorohexane vapor, or (5) PLV with perfluorooctane (30 ml/kg). Two hours after randomization, lungs were recruited and positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to obtain minimal elastance. Ventilation was continued during 4 additional hours, when animals were killed for lung histologic examination. Gas exchange and elastance were comparable among vaporized perfluorohexane, PLV, and GV before the open lung approach was used and improved in a similar fashion in all groups after positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to optimal elastance (P < 0.05). A similar behavior was observed in functional residual capacity (FRC) in animals treated with vaporized perfluorohexane and GV. Lung resistance improved after recruitment (P < 0.05), but values were higher in the 10% perfluorohexane and PLV groups as compared with GV (P < 0.05). Interestingly, positive end-expiratory pressure values required to obtain minimal elastance were lower with 5% perfluorohexane than with PLV and GV (P < 0.05). In addition, diffuse alveolar damage was significantly lower in the 5% and 10% perfluorohexane vapor groups as compared with PLV and GV (P < 0.05). Although the use of 5% vaporized perfluorohexane permitted the authors to reduce pressures needed to stabilize the lungs and was associated with better histologic findings than were PLV and GV, none of these perfluorocarbon therapies improved gas exchange or lung mechanics as compared with GV.Anesthesiology 02/2006; 104(2):278-89. · 5.36 Impact Factor -
Article: Comparative Effects of Vaporized Perfluorohexane and Partial Liquid Ventilation in Oleic Acid– induced Lung Injury
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background: It is currently not known whether vaporized perfluorohexane is superior to partial liquid ventilation (PLV) for therapy of acute lung injury. In this study, the authors compared the effects of both therapies in oleic acid–induced lung injury.Anesthesiology 01/2006; 104(2):278-289. · 5.36 Impact Factor -
Article: Circulating levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor are associated with mild pulmonary dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a central mediator of inflammatory response and acute lung injury that is secreted in response to corticosteroids. A rise in systemic MIF levels was described after cardiac surgery in steroid-treated patients. This study aimed to investigate the circulating levels of MIF and the possible relationship of this cytokine to pulmonary dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We included 74 patients without previous organ dysfunction undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS). The same team performed all CABS via a standard technique adding methylprednisolone (15 mg/kg) to the CPB priming solution (Group MP, n = 37). In the remaining patients (Group NS, n = 37), methylprednisolone was withdrawn from the CPB priming. MIF, C-reactive protein (CRP), and total C3 were assayed in peripheral blood sampled immediately before anesthesia induction and 3, 6, and 24 h post-CPB. Preoperative risk scores and peri- and postoperative variables were documented. Postoperative kinetics of MIF and C3 were similar for both groups. Levels of CRP 24 h post-CPB were higher in Group MP (P = 0.003). Higher MIF levels were detected 6 h post-CPB, and returned to preoperative levels 24 h after CPB. MIF levels 6 h post-CPB were inversely related to the postoperative PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P = 0.0021) and were directly related to the duration of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.014). Perioperative use of methylprednisolone did not modify the MIF response to CPB, but it was related to an enhanced acute phase response. Higher circulating MIF levels 6 h post-CPB were associated with worse postoperative pulmonary short-course outcome.Shock 01/2005; 22(6):533-7. · 2.85 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
- Anesthesiology (2)
- Shock (1)
- Critical care (London, England) (1)
- Critical care medicine (1)
- Shock (Augusta, Ga.) (1)
