Mitsuhiro Tsukino

Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto-fu, Japan

Are you Mitsuhiro Tsukino?

Claim your profile

Publications (28)95.33 Total impact

  • Source
    Article: Predictive properties of different multidimensional staging systems in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered to be a respiratory disease with systemic manifestations. Some multidimensional staging systems, not based solely on the level of airflow limitation, have been developed; however, these systems have rarely been compared. We previously recruited 150 male outpatients with COPD for an analysis of factors related to mortality. For this report, we examined the discriminative and prognostic predictive properties of three COPD multidimensional measurements. These indices were the modified BODE (mBODE), which includes body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity; the ADO, composed of age, dyspnea, and airflow obstruction; and the modified DOSE (mDOSE), comprising dyspnea, airflow obstruction, smoking status, and exacerbation frequency. Among these indices, the frequency distribution of the mBODE index was the most widely and normally distributed. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses revealed that the scores on three indices were significantly predictive of 5-year mortality of COPD (P < 0.001). The scores on the mBODE and ADO indices were more significantly predictive of mortality than forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the Medical Research Council dyspnea score, and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score. However, peak oxygen uptake on progressive cycle ergometry was more significantly related to mortality than the scores on the three indices (P < 0.0001). The multidimensional staging systems using the mBODE, ADO, and mDOSE indices were significant predictors of mortality in COPD patients, although exercise capacity had a more significant relationship with mortality than those indices. The mBODE index was superior to the others for its discriminative property. Further discussion of the definition of disease severity is necessary to promote concrete multidimensional staging systems as a new disease severity index in guidelines for the management of COPD.
    International Journal of COPD 01/2011; 6:521-6.
  • Source
    Article: Tazobactam/piperacillin for moderate-to-severe pneumonia in patients with risk for aspiration: comparison with imipenem/cilastatin.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment of aspiration pneumonia is becoming an important issue due to aging of populations worldwide. Effectiveness of tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) in aspiration pneumonia is not clear. To compare clinical efficacy between TAZ/PIPC (1:4 compound) and imipenem/cilastatin (IPM/CS) in patients with moderate-to-severe aspiration pneumonia. In this open-label, randomized study either TAZ/PIPC 5 g or IPM/CS 1 g was intravenously administered every 12 h to patients with moderate-to-severe community-acquired aspiration pneumonia or nursing home-acquired pneumonia with risk for aspiration pneumonia for average 11 days. The primary outcome was clinical response rate at the end of treatment (EOT) in validated per-protocol (VPP) population. Secondary outcomes were clinical response during treatment (days 4 and 7) and at the end of study (EOS) in VPP population, and survival at day 30 in modified intention-to-treat (MITT) population. There was no difference between the groups in primary or secondary outcome. However, significantly faster improvement as measured by axillary temperature (p < 0.05) and WBC count (p = 0.01) was observed under TAZ/PIPC treatment. In patients with gram-positive bacterial infection, TAZ/PIPC was more effective at EOT in VPP population (p = 0.03). TAZ/PIPC is as effective and safe as IPM/CS in the treatment of moderate- to-severe aspiration pneumonia.
    Pulmonary Pharmacology &amp Therapeutics 10/2010; 23(5):403-10. · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Article: Multidimensional analyses of long-term clinical courses of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic respiratory disorders involving obstructive airway defects. There have been many discussions on their similarities and differences. Although airflow limitation expressed as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) has been considered to be the main diagnostic assessment in both diseases, it does not reflect the functional impairment imparted to the patients by these diseases. Therefore, multidimensional approaches using multiple measurements in assessing disease control or severity have been recommended, and multiple endpoints in addition to FEV(1) have been set recently in clinical trials so as not to miss the overall effects. In particular, as improving symptoms and health status as well as pulmonary function are important goals in the management of asthma and COPD, some patient-reported measurements such as health-related quality of life or dyspnea should be included. Nonetheless, there have been few reviews on the long-term clinical course comparing asthma and COPD as predicted by measurements other than airflow limitation. Here, we therefore analyzed and compared longitudinal changes in both physiological measurements and patient-reported measurements in asthma and COPD. Although both diseases showed similar long-term progressive airflow limitation similarly despite guideline-based therapies, disease progression was different in asthma and COPD. In asthma, patient-reported assessments of health status, disability and psychological status remained clinically stable over time, in contrast to the significant deterioration of these parameters in COPD. Thus, because a single measurement of airflow limitation is insufficient to monitor these diseases, multidimensional analyses are important not only for disease control but also for understanding disease progression in asthma and COPD.
    Allergology International 09/2010; 59(3):257-65.
  • Article: Possible Maximal Change in the SF‐36 of Outpatients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the responsiveness of the Short Form‐36 (SF‐36) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. We studied patients with COPD and asthma who attended our outpatient clinic. In the first cross‐sectional study, we compared the differences in the SF‐36 scores between pretreatment patients (152 with COPD and 174 with asthma) who visited the clinic for the first time and in‐treatment patients (123 with COPD and 151 with asthma) who had received treatment for > 6 months. The differences in each scale of the SF‐36 ranged from 6.9 to 14.4 in COPD patients and from 7.0 to 28.3 in asthma patients. In the second longitudinal study, patients who visited for the first time were enrolled, and the initial, and, 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐month evaluations of the SF‐36 were studied. A total of 136 COPD patients and 136 asthma patients were enrolled consecutively, and 100 patients with COPD and 66 patients with asthma completed the year‐long examinations. In COPD patients, except for bodily pain, the scores in all scales of the SF‐36 improved significantly during the first 3 or 6 months. In patients with asthma, all scale scores of the SF‐36 improved significantly during the first 3 months. Maximal changes in the SF‐36 scores were observed at 6 or 12 months. Longitudinal maximal changes in each scale approached or exceeded the possible maximal changes, which were derived from the differences in the scores between pretreatment patients and in‐treatment patients in the first cross‐sectional study. Improvements in the SF‐36 scores showed moderate to strong negative correlations with their baseline scores in patients with COPD and asthma. In conclusion, the SF‐36 shows sufficient responsiveness in the assessment of the health status of patients with COPD and asthma, but these responses are strongly influenced by their baseline values.
    08/2009; 41(3):355-365.
  • Source
    Article: Effect of exacerbations on health status in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute exacerbations may cause deteriorations in the health status of subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study prospectively evaluated the effects of such exacerbations on the health status and pulmonary function of subjects with COPD over a 6-month period, and examined whether those subjects showed a steeper decline in their health status versus those subjects without exacerbations. A total of 156 subjects with COPD (mean age 71.4 +/- 6.3 years) were included in the analysis. At baseline and after 6 months, their pulmonary function and health status were evaluated using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). An acute exacerbation was defined as a worsening of respiratory symptoms requiring the administration of systemic corticosteroids or antibiotics, or both. Forty-eight subjects experienced one or more exacerbations during the 6-month study period, and showed a statistically and clinically significant decline in Symptom scores on the SGRQ, whereas subjects without exacerbations did not show a clinically significant decline. Logistic multiple regression analyses confirmed that the exacerbations significantly influenced the Fatigue and Mastery domains of the CRQ, and the Symptoms in the SGRQ. Twelve subjects with frequent exacerbations demonstrated a more apparent decline in health status. Although pulmonary function did not significantly decline during the 6-month period, acute exacerbations were responsible for a decline in health status. To minimize deteriorations in health status, one must prevent recurrent acute exacerbations and reduce the exacerbation frequencies in COPD subjects.
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 08/2009; 7:69. · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • Article: Comparison of health-related quality of life measurements using a single value in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Three methods have been developed to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) expressed as a single value: the global rating scale, the total score obtained from disease-specific instruments, and the preference-based utility index. We compared these different single HRQoL measurements in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We recruited 167 patients with asthma and 161 patients with COPD. The global rating HRQoL was assessed by the Hyland scale. The total HRQoL was assessed by the Living With Asthma Questionnaire in asthma and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in COPD. The Quality of Well-being (QWB) scale was used for the utility measurement derived from the Medical Outcome Study Short-form 36. The inter-relationships between these three HRQoL values were weak to moderate in asthma and moderate in COPD. In asthma, the Hyland scale was weakly correlated with the total HRQoL (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients [Rs] = -0.20) and moderately with the QWB score (Rs = -0.43). In the stepwise multiple regression analyses, anxiety on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and the dyspnea score tended to correlate more significantly with the single HRQoL values in both asthma and COPD than physiological measurements such as the forced expiratory volume in one second. The Hyland scale was less correlated with existing parameters (cumulative coefficient determination [R(2)] = 0.04) than the total HRQoL (cumulative R(2) = 0.47) and the QWB scale (cumulative R(2) = 0.49) in asthma. The single HRQoL values from the Hyland scale, the total HRQoL and the QWB scale evaluated different aspects of asthma and COPD. The psychological status and dyspnea contributed more significantly to the single HRQoL values in these two disorders than the physiological measurements. In asthma, the Hyland scale was especially different from the other single HRQoL scales and should be evaluated separately from the multi-item HRQoL assessments.
    Journal of Asthma 10/2008; 45(7):615-20. · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • Article: Body mass index in male patients with COPD: correlation with low attenuation areas on CT.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by the presence of airflow limitation caused by loss of lung elasticity and/or airway narrowing. The pathological hallmark of loss of lung elasticity is emphysema, and airway wall remodelling contributes to the airway narrowing. Using CT, these lesions can be assessed by measuring low attenuation areas (LAA) and airway wall thickness/luminal area, respectively. As previously reported, COPD can be divided into airway dominant, emphysema dominant and mixed phenotypes using CT. In this study, it is postulated that a patient's physique may be associated with the relative contribution of these lesions to airflow obstruction. CT was used to evaluate emphysema and airway dimensions in 201 patients with COPD. Emphysema was evaluated using percentage of LAA voxels (LAA%) and airway lesion was estimated by percentage wall area (WA%). Patients were divided into four phenotypes using LAA% and WA%. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the higher LAA% phenotype (ie, emphysema dominant and mixed phenotypes). BMI correlated with LAA% (rho = -0.557, p<0.0001) but not with WA%. BMI was significantly lower in the emphysema dominant phenotype than in the airway dominant phenotype, while there was no difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 s %predicted between the two. A low BMI is associated with the presence of emphysema, but not with airway wall thickening, in male smokers who have COPD. These results support the concept of different COPD phenotypes and suggest that there may be different systemic manifestations of these phenotypes.
    Thorax 10/2008; 64(1):20-5. · 6.84 Impact Factor
  • Article: Analysis of longitudinal changes in the psychological status of patients with asthma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Significant relationships between the psychological status and poor asthma outcomes are often reported. However, most of these studies are cross-sectional and none have evaluated how the psychological status progresses over time during the management of asthma patients. Therefore, we examined the longitudinal changes in the psychological status of asthma patients, and compared them with changes in other clinical measurements. Eighty-seven outpatients with stable asthma after 6 months of treatment were enrolled in this study. The psychological status was evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the health status using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The patient's pulmonary function, peak expiratory flow values and airway hyperresponsiveness were measured at entry and every year thereafter over a 5-year period. Using mixed effects models to estimate the slopes, the HADS anxiety and depression scores did not change significantly over time (p=0.71 and 0.72, respectively). The changes in the HADS scores correlated noticeably with changes in the AQLQ and SGRQ scores, but not with changes in the physiological measurements. The baseline HADS anxiety and depression scores were significantly correlated to the subsequent annual changes in each measurement. The psychological status remained clinically stable over the 5-year study period in patients with stable asthma. Changes in the psychological status were significantly correlated to changes in the health status. The baseline HADS scores were a useful indicator in detecting patients who would show subsequent deterioration in their psychological status.
    Respiratory Medicine 11/2007; 101(10):2133-8. · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Article: Longitudinal deteriorations in patient reported outcomes in patients with COPD.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Goals of effective management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) include relieving their symptoms and improving their health status. We examined how such patient reported outcomes would change longitudinally in comparison to physiological outcomes in COPD. One hundred thirty-seven male outpatients with stable COPD were recruited for the study. The subjects health status was evaluated using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ). Their dyspnoea using the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and their psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were assessed upon entry and every 6 months thereafter over a 5-year period. Pulmonary function and exercise capacity as evaluated by peak oxygen uptake (VO2) on progressive cycle ergometry were also followed over the same time. Using mixed effects models to estimate the slopes for the changes, scores on the SGRQ, the CRQ, the MRC and the HADS worsened in a statistically significant manner over time. However, changes only weakly correlated with changes in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) and peak (VO2). We demonstrated that although changes in pulmonary function and exercise capacity are well known in patients with COPD, patient reported outcomes such as health status, dyspnoea and psychological status also deteriorated significantly over time. In addition, deteriorations in patient reported outcomes only weakly correlated to changes in physiological indices. To capture the overall deterioration of COPD from the subjective viewpoints of the patients, patient reported outcomes should be followed separately from physiological outcomes.
    Respiratory Medicine 02/2007; 101(1):146-53. · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Article: Dyspnoea with activities of daily living versus peak dyspnoea during exercise in male patients with COPD.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dyspnoea measurements in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be broadly divided into two categories: those that assess breathlessness during exercise, and those that assess breathlessness during daily activities. We investigated the relationships between dyspnoea at the end of exercise and during daily activities with clinical measurements and mortality in COPD patients. We examined 143 male outpatients with moderate to very severe COPD. The peak Borg score at the end of progressive cycle ergometry was used for the assessment of peak dyspnoea rating during exercise, and the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) score was used for dyspnoea with activities of daily living. Relationships between these dyspnoea ratings with other clinical measurements of pulmonary function, exercise indices, health status and psychological status were then investigated. In addition, their relationship with the 5-year mortality of COPD patients was also analyzed to examine their predictive ability. Although the BDI score was significantly correlated with airflow limitation, diffusing capacity, exercise indices, health status and psychological status, the Borg score at the end of exercise had non-existent or only weak correlations with them. The BDI score was strongly significantly correlated with mortality, whereas the Borg score was not. Dyspnoea during daily activities was more significantly correlated with objective and subjective measurements of COPD than dyspnoea at the end of exercise. In addition, the former was more predictive of mortality. Dyspnoea with activities of daily living is considered to be a better measurement for evaluating the disease severity of COPD than peak dyspnoea during exercise.
    Respiratory Medicine 07/2006; 100(6):965-71. · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Article: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 promoter polymorphism associated with upper lung dominant emphysema.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) has proteolytic activity against connective tissue proteins and appears to play an important role in the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The functional polymorphism of MMP-9 (C-1562T) is considered as one of the candidate genes in the susceptibility to COPD. To determine if MMP-9 (C-1562T) is related to the development of COPD in the Japanese population and whether it is associated with development of pulmonary emphysema assessed by high-resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) parameters. MMP-9 (C-1562T) genotypes of 84 patients with COPD and 85 healthy smokers (control subjects) were determined by the restriction fragment length polymorphism method. We investigated the relationship between the genotypes using automatically analyzed HRCT parameters, such as percentage of low attenuation area (LAA%) and average computed tomography (CT) value density (Hounsfield units; mean CTv) in upper, middle, and lower lung fields in all patients with COPD. There was no difference in polymorphism of MMP-9 (C-1562T) between patients with COPD and control subjects. In the HRCT study, patients with COPD with a T allele (C/T or T/T) showed larger LAA% (95% confidence interval of difference, 0.5-18.7; p = 0.04), and smaller mean CTv (confidence interval, -34.3 to -1.0; p = 0.04) in the upper lung compared with patients without T alleles (C/C). However, pulmonary function tests showed no difference between the two patient groups. Patients with a T allele showed a decrease in LAA% and an increase in mean CTv from upper to lower lung fields (p = 0.006 and p = 0.002, respectively). Polymorphism of MMP-9 (C-1562T) was associated with upper lung dominant emphysema in patients with COPD.
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 01/2006; 172(11):1378-82. · 11.08 Impact Factor
  • Article: Exercise capacity deterioration in patients with COPD: longitudinal evaluation over 5 years.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although exercise capacity is an important outcome measure in patients with COPD, its longitudinal course has not been analyzed in comparison to the change in pulmonary function. To examine how exercise capacity would deteriorate over time in patients with COPD, and what factors would contribute to it. A total of 137 male outpatients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD were examined. The average age was 69.0 +/- 6.6 years (+/- SD), and the mean postbronchodilator FEV(1) was 45.9 +/- 15.4% predicted. Progressive cycle ergometry and pulmonary function testing were performed at entry, and every 6 months thereafter over 5 years. Due to the presence of missing data, a mixed-effect model analysis was then used to estimate the longitudinal changes in various clinical parameters. Peak oxygen uptake (Vo(2)), peak minute ventilation (Ve), and peak tidal volume (Vt) during exercise declined significantly over time (p < 0.0001), which was no less rapid than the deterioration in FEV(1). The mean decline rates for peak Vo(2) were 32 +/- 60 mL/min/yr and 0.5 +/- 1.0 mL/min/kg/yr. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the changes in peak Ve, peak Vt, and peak respiratory rates were significant predictors for the change in peak Vo(2). We demonstrated clear evidence of measurable and progressive deterioration in exercise capacity in COPD patients, which was no less rapid than the decline in airflow limitation. Dynamic ventilatory constraints during exercise also deteriorated over time, which most significantly contributed to this exercise capacity deterioration. In addition to pulmonary function, the longitudinal follow-up of exercise capacity is important not to miss the overall deterioration in COPD.
    Chest 08/2005; 128(1):62-9. · 5.25 Impact Factor
  • Article: Longitudinal changes in patient vs. physician-based outcome measures did not significantly correlate in asthma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although improving health status is one important aim in managing asthmatic patients, few studies have evaluated their health status longitudinally. Therefore, we examined longitudinal changes in health status of asthma patients, and compared them with changes in physiological measures. Eighty-seven outpatients with stable asthma after 6 months of treatment were recruited. Health status using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), pulmonary function, peak expiratory flow (PEF) values, and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) were evaluated at entry and every year over a 5-year period. Using mixed effects models to estimate the slopes, the overall AQLQ score declined statistically at a mean rate of 0.06 units/year (P=.0091). However, this decline did not reach a clinically significant level at 5 years. The total SGRQ score did not change significantly (P=.54). Although the forced expiratory volume in 1 sec declined at a mean rate of 53 mL/year, the PEF variability and AHR improved significantly. Health status was clinically stable over the 5-year study period in patients with asthma, which contrasted with the changes in the physiological outcome measures. As a patient centered outcome measure, health status should be followed separately.
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 06/2005; 58(5):532-9. · 4.27 Impact Factor
  • Article: Exercise responses during endurance testing at different intensities in patients with COPD.
    Toru Oga, Koichi Nishimura, Mitsuhiro Tsukino, Susumu Sato
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endurance time on submaximal exercise tests is a sensitive measure in detecting changes after medical intervention and is used as an outcome in clinical trials, although there has been little discussion regarding the appropriate intensity. Therefore, we investigated whether there were differences in exercise responses between endurance tests at high versus moderate intensity, and analyzed which test was more appropriate. Thirty-seven patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease participated in the study. They performed cycle endurance tests at high and moderate submaximal workloads representing 80% and 60% of the maximum work rate reached on progressive cycle ergometry, respectively. Each type of exercise test was performed after inhaling salbutamol 400 microg, ipratropium bromide 80 microg or an identical placebo. Endurance time on the 80% endurance test was much shorter than on the 60% endurance test. The coefficients of variation for the endurance time were lower on the 80% test. Statistically significant improvements in the endurance time after bronchodilators in comparison to placebo were found only on the 80% test. When using the endurance time as an outcome, the high intensity endurance test is preferable to the moderate intensity endurance test, as the high intensity test demonstrated shorter exercise time, less variability and higher sensitivity.
    Respiratory Medicine 07/2004; 98(6):515-21. · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Article: A comparison of two simple measures to evaluate the health status of asthmatics: the Asthma Bother Profile and the Airways Questionnaire 20.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Simple and concise measures for health status are desirable in clinical practice. The Asthma Bother Profile (ABP), which consists of 23 items, has been developed to assess how much asthma bothers patients. The Airways Questionnaire 20 (AQ20) is a simple instrument which consists of 20 items. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the ABP and AQ20 evaluate the health status of patients with asthma. A total of 166 patients with chronic asthma (age: 48 +/- 16 yr, 77 males) completed pulmonary function testing, measurement of airway hyperresponsiveness, dyspnea rating, assessments of their anxiety and depression (HADS; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and assessments of their health status. The health status was assessed using the ABP, AQ20, the short-form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36), the Living With Asthma Questionnaire (LWAQ) and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). The Japanese version of the ABP included only 15 'bother' items out of the original 23 items due to cultural differences. The scores on the ABP were widely distributed, whereas the scores on the AQ20 were skewed towards the milder end of the scale. The ABP had a strong correlation with the Avoidance and Distress constructs on the LWAQ, and Anxiety and Depression on the HADS (Rs = 0.56 to approximately 0.79), and its strongest correlation with the General Health (Rs = -0.64) scale among the 8 subscales on the SF-36. The AQ20 had a less significant correlation with the LWAQ, AQLQ, and SF-36 than the ABP. The ABP and AQ20 were short and simple to complete, and both measures could easily be used in clinical practice. The ABP can evaluate patients more specifically with respect to distress and bother than the AQ20.
    Journal of Asthma 05/2004; 41(2):141-6. · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • Article: Health-related quality of life in stable asthma: what are remaining quality of life problems in patients with well-controlled asthma?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We purposed to examine the distribution of the disturbances in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to determine the relationship between HRQoL and various clinical parameters in patients with well-controlled asthma according to the guidelines. We enrolled 162 patients with stable asthma, and 113 were defined as well-controlled. HRQoL was measured by the Living with Asthma Questionnaire (LWAQ), the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the short-form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36), dyspnea by the Medical Research Council (MRC), and psychological status by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). In both stable and well-controlled patients, the frequency distributions showed that the scores on the Avoidance, Distress, and Preoccupation constructs on the LWAQ were widely distributed, whereas the scores on the Vitality and General Health scales on the SF-36 were normally distributed. In patients with well-controlled asthma, the HADS had mild to moderate correlations with all questionnaires. Multiple regression analysis showed that the Anxiety, the MRC scale and the treatment steps accounted for 44% of the variance in the Avoidance on the LWAQ. These results suggest that domains of psychological well-being may continue to be affected even though the asthma patients are well-controlled by guideline criteria.
    Journal of Asthma 03/2004; 41(1):57-65. · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • Article: Development and psychometric analysis of the Japanese version of the Nottingham Health Profile: cross-cultural adaptation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To adapt the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) for Japanese and to describe the results of the assessment of its psychometric properties. Assessments included test-retest reliability over approximately a 2-week interval, internal consistency and construct validity in 133 patients with COPD. The distribution of scores indicated that most of the NHP sections exhibited a floor effect, although this is greatly reduced with the NHP-Distress scale. The test-retest reliability was above 0.8 for all sections when patients reporting any change in their health status rating were excluded. Cronbach's alpha coefficients reflected the number of items contained in each section. The internal consistency of the emotional reactions section at one timepoint and the physical mobility section at both timepoints were lower than expected to be higher. All sections except the pain section could be used to distinguish patients who reported their health status to be good or fair from those who rated it to be poor or very poor. The adaptation of the NHP for Japanese was successful. Most sections showed reasonable test-retest reliability, indicating that they produced acceptable levels of random measurement error. The internal consistency of the sections was confirmed, although the alpha values of the emotional reactions and physical mobility sections were lower than might be expected for scales of their length. Different sections of the Japanese NHP were shown to have known group validity.
    Internal Medicine 02/2004; 43(1):35-41. · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • Article: Risk and severity of COPD is associated with the group-specific component of serum globulin 1F allele.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The finding that only 15 to 20% of cigarette smokers acquire COPD suggests that there is a genetic predisposition to the disease. Genetic polymorphism of the group-specific component of serum globulin (Gc-globulin), also known as vitamin-D-binding protein, is considered one of the candidates for the susceptibility to COPD. However, the role of Gc-globulin polymorphism in the development of COPD remains inconclusive. s: To determine whether Gc-globulin gene polymorphism plays a role in the development of COPD in the Japanese population, and whether it is associated with the physiologic deterioration in COPD, and its radiologically detectable correlates. Association study. Subjects and methods: One hundred three patients with COPD and 88 healthy smokers sampled from the Japanese population were genotyped for Gc-globulin by the restriction fragment-length polymorphism method. Based on the results of the genotyping, we investigated the relationship between Gc-globulin polymorphism and a physiologic/radiologic indicator of lung function, namely, the annual decline of FEV(1) (dFEV(1)) in 86 patients with COPD and 21 healthy smokers. Additionally, high-resolution CT parameters such as low-attenuation area percentage (LAA%) and average CT number (mean CT score) were measured in 85 patients with COPD. There was an increased proportion of Gc*1F homozygotes in the patients with COPD (32%) compared with the healthy smokers (17%) [p = 0.01; odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.6]. Patients with COPD and the Gc*1F allele showed a larger dFEV(1) (p = 0.01), higher frequency with LAA% > 60% (p = 0.01), and lower mean CT score than patients without this allele (p = 0.03). Gc-globulin polymorphism is significantly associated with susceptibility to COPD, and also with the severity of the disease.
    Chest 02/2004; 125(1):63-70. · 5.25 Impact Factor
  • Article: Possible maximal change in the SF-36 of outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the responsiveness of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. We studied patients with COPD and asthma who attended our outpatient clinic. In the first cross-sectional study, we compared the differences in the SF-36 scores between pretreatment patients (152 with COPD and 174 with asthma) who visited the clinic for the first time and in-treatment patients (123 with COPD and 151 with asthma) who had received treatment for > 6 months. The differences in each scale of the SF-36 ranged from 6.9 to 14.4 in COPD patients and from 7.0 to 28.3 in asthma patients. In the second longitudinal study, patients who visited for the first time were enrolled, and the initial, and, 3-, 6-, and 12-month evaluations of the SF-36 were studied. A total of 136 COPD patients and 136 asthma patients were enrolled consecutively, and 100 patients with COPD and 66 patients with asthma completed the year-long examinations. In COPD patients, except for bodily pain, the scores in all scales of the SF-36 improved significantly during the first 3 or 6 months. In patients with asthma, all scale scores of the SF-36 improved significantly during the first 3 months. Maximal changes in the SF-36 scores were observed at 6 or 12 months. Longitudinal maximal changes in each scale approached or exceeded the possible maximal changes, which were derived from the differences in the scores between pretreatment patients and in-treatment patients in the first cross-sectional study. Improvements in the SF-36 scores showed moderate to strong negative correlations with their baseline scores in patients with COPD and asthma. In conclusion, the SF-36 shows sufficient responsiveness in the assessment of the health status of patients with COPD and asthma, but these responses are strongly influenced by their baseline values.
    Journal of Asthma 01/2004; 41(3):355-65. · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Optimal cutoff level of breath carbon monoxide for assessing smoking status in patients with asthma and COPD.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the optimal cutoff level of breath CO concentration to distinguish actual smokers from nonsmokers among patients with asthma and COPD. Kyoto University Hospital outpatient clinic. Three hundred thirty-one consecutive outpatients (161 with asthma and 170 with COPD) were examined cross-sectionally by self-reported smoking status, breath CO monitoring, and serum cotinine concentration. Actual smoking status was verified by serum cotinine concentration. Mean serum cotinine concentrations of never smokers, former smokers, and current smokers with asthma were 6.0 +/- 5.2 ng/mL, 12.1 +/- 25.0 ng/mL, and 198.3 +/- 181.7 ng/mL, respectively (+/- SD). Mean serum cotinine concentrations of former smokers and current smokers with COPD were 23.2 +/- 69.2 ng/mL and 191.1 +/- 109.8 ng/mL, respectively. Mean breath CO levels of never smokers, former smokers, and current smokers with asthma were 6.1 +/- 2.4 ppm, 7.7 +/- 3.2 ppm, and 19.9 +/- 17.3 ppm, respectively. Mean breath CO levels of former smokers and current smokers with COPD were 7.7 +/- 4.3 ppm and 13.5 +/- 6.5 ppm, respectively. The optimal cutoff level of breath CO to discriminate between actual smokers and nonsmokers was 10 ppm in patients with asthma and 11 ppm in patients with COPD, giving 85.0% and 73.1% sensitivity, and 85.8% and 84.7% specificity, respectively. The optimal cutoff level of breath CO to assess actual smoking status was 10 ppm in patients with stable asthma and 11 ppm in patients with stable COPD. In patients with asthma and COPD, breath CO levels were potentially influenced by underlying airway inflammation, suggesting misclassification in the assessment of smoking status by breath CO.
    Chest 12/2003; 124(5):1749-54. · 5.25 Impact Factor