Robert R. Kuske

Washington University in St. Louis, San Luis, Missouri, United States

Are you Robert R. Kuske?

Claim your profile

Publications (36)135.32 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The results of breast-conservation therapy using breast irradiation and a boost to the tumor excision site with either electron beam or interstitial 192Ir implant are reviewed. A total of 701 patients with histologically confirmed Stage T1 and T2 carcinoma of the breast were treated with wide local tumor excision or quadrantectomy and breast irradiation. The breast was treated with tangential fields using 4 or 6 MV photons to deliver 48 to 50 Gy in 1.8 to 2 Gy daily dose, in five weekly fractions. In 80 patients the regional lymphatics were irradiated. In 342 patients with Stage T1 and 107 with Stage T2 tumors, boost to the primary tumor excision site was delivered with 9 MeV and, more frequently, with 12 MeV electrons. In 91 patients with Stage T1 and 38 patients with Stage T2 tumors an interstitial 192Ir implant was performed. Tumor control, disease-free survival, cosmesis, and morbidity of therapy are reviewed. Minimum follow-up is 4 years (median 5.6 years; maximum, 24 years). The overall local tumor recurrence rates were 5% in the T1 and 11% in the T2 tumor groups. There was no significant difference in the breast relapse rate in patients treated with either electron beam or interstitial 192Ir boost. Regional lymph node recurrences were 1% in patients with T1 and 5% with T2 tumors. Distant metastases were recorded in 5% of the T1 and 23% of the T2 groups. The 10-year actuarial disease-free survival rates were 87% for patients with T1 and 75% with T2 tumors. Disease-free survival was exactly the same in patients receiving either electron beam or interstitial 192Ir boost. Cosmesis was rated as excellent/good in 84% of patients with T1 tumors treated with electron beam and 81% of patients treated with interstitial implant, and 74 and 79% respectively, in patients with T2 tumors. Breast-conservation therapy is an effective treatment for patients with T1 and T2 carcinoma of the breast. There is no difference in local tumor control, disease-free survival, cosmesis, or morbidity in patients treated with either electron beam or interstitial 192Ir implant boost. Clinical trials in progress will further elucidate this controversial subject.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 04/1996; 34(5):995-1007. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(95)02378-X · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Host, tumor, and treatment-related factors influencing cosmetic outcome are analyzed for patients receiving breast conservation treatment. Four-hundred and fifty-eight patients with evaluable records for cosmesis evaluation, a subset of 701 patients treated for invasive breast cancer with conservation technique between 1969 and 1990, were prospectively analyzed. In 243 patients, cosmetic evaluation was not adequately recorded. Cosmesis evaluation was carried out from 3.7 months to 22.3 years, median of 4.4 years. By pathologic stage, tumors were 62% T1N0, 14% T1N1, 15%, T2N0, and 9% T2N1. The majority of patients were treated with 4-6 MV photons. Cosmetic evaluation was rated by both patient and physician every 4-6 months. A logistic regression analysis was completed using a stepwise logistic regression. P-values of 0.05 or less were considered significant. Excellent cosmetic scores were used in all statistical analyses unless otherwise specified. At most recent follow-up, 87% of patients and 81% of physicians scored their cosmetic outcome as excellent or good. Eighty-two percent of physician and patient evaluations agreed with excellent-good vs. fair-poor rating categories. Analysis demonstrated a lower proportion of excellent cosmetic scores when related to patient age > 60 years (p = 0.001), postmenopausal status (p = 0.02), black race (p = 0.0034), and T2 tumor size (p = 0.05). Surgical factors of importance were: volume of resection > 100 cm3 (p = 0.0001), scar orientation compliance with the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) guidelines (p = 0.0034), and > 20 cm2 skin resected (p = 0.0452). Extent of axillary surgery did not significantly affect breast cosmesis. Radiation factors affecting cosmesis included treatment volume (tangential breast fields only vs. three or more fields) (p = 0.034), whole breast dose in excess of 50 Gy (p = 0.0243), and total dose to tumor site > 65 Gy (p = 0.06), as well as optimum dose distribution with compensating filters (p = 0.002). Daily fraction size of 1.8 Gy vs. 2.0 Gy, boost vs. no boost, type of boost (brachytherapy vs. electrons), total radiation dose, and use of bolus were not significant factors. Use of concomitant chemotherapy with irradiation impaired excellent cosmetic outcome (p = 0.02). Use of sequential chemotherapy or adjuvant tamoxifen did not appear to diminish excellent cosmetic outcomes (p = 0.31). Logistic regression for excellent cosmetic outcome analysis was completed for age, tumor size, menopausal status, race, type of surgery, volume of breast tissue resected, scar orientations, whole breast radiation dose, total radiation dose, number of radiation fields treated, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Significant independent factors for excellent cosmetic outcome were: volume of tissue resected (p = 0.0001), type of surgery (p = 0.0001), breast radiation dose (p = 0.005), race (p = 0.002), and age (p = 0.007). Satisfactory cosmesis was recorded in 81% of patients. Impaired cosmetic results are more likely with improper orientation of tylectomy and axillary incisions, larger volume of breast resection, radiation dose to the entire breast in excess of 50.0 Gy, and concurrent administration of chemotherapy. Careful selection of treatment procedures for specific patients/tumors and refinement in surgical/irradiation techniques will enhance the cosmetic results in breast conservation therapy.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 03/1995; 31(4):753-64. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(94)00480-3 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • Robert R. Kuske
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) is the most lethal and fulminant of all breast cancers. IBC can be either clinically or pathologically defined, but the prognosis is equally poor, whether it is diagnosed using clinical or pathological criteria or a combination of both. Rapid growth and short doubling times are characteristic of IBC, resulting in local growth analogous to a "brush fire," extending rapidly in all directions across all surfaces and tissue planes. In addition, rapid systemic dissemination results in the death of the majority of these patients. Traditional treatment of IBC consisted of surgery or radiation therapy alone, with cure rates rarely achieving 15%. The advent of successful combination chemotherapy regimens, along with local irradiation of the breast and regional lymphatics, has increased the 5-year disease-free survival rate to 35% to 50%. In spite of recent innovative European programs combining radiation therapy and chemotherapy without mastectomy, optimal treatment is still considered to be induction chemotherapy, mastectomy, and comprehensive chest wall/nodal irradiation following by maintenance chemotherapy. Some centers are also investigating accelerated radiation therapy fractionation schemes that may further improve local control through maximizing the radiobiological response of tumor cells. Attention to radiotherapy technique can minimize local-regional tumor control and minimize long-term complications. There is considerable room for improvement. Numerous studies are in progress attemping to improve survival rates, including use of autologous bone marrow transplantation. Better systemic agents and more effective drug combinations are needed. Once systemic micrometastases are reliably eradicated, improvement in local-regional control will become even more important for IBC patients.
    Seminars in radiation oncology 11/1994; 4(4):270-282. DOI:10.1053/SRAO00400270 · 4.03 Impact Factor
  • International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 12/1993; 27:271-271. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(93)90863-Q · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Between 1979 and 1987, 76 women with 77 ductal carcinomas in-situ of the breast were evaluated by The Radiation Oncology Center after breast conservation surgery. Seventy breasts (91%) had tylectomy and irradiation and seven breasts (9%) had tylectomy alone. Median follow-up was 4.0 years, with a range of 2-10 years. Fifty patients (65%) had occult lesions discovered by mammography with a median mammographic size of 0.9 cm. The twenty-six patients with presenting symptoms had a median clinical tumor size of 1.95 cm. All patients had local excision of the primary tumor. Of 15 patients who had axillary dissections, one had nodal metastasis. Seventy breasts were irradiated. Seven patients refused radiotherapy. Overall 5-year actuarial survival was 99%; 5-year actuarial disease-free survival was 89%; the 5-year actuarial intramammary tumor control rate for irradiated patients was 93% vs. 57% for patients not irradiated (p < 0.001). Comedocarcinoma had a 5-year actuarial tumor control rate of 75%, 88% in the irradiated group as compared to 98% for all other histologic subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ (p < 0.03). All six patients with local failure were successfully salvaged by further surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed significant factors in local control to be (a) radiotherapy, (b) comedocarcinoma histology, and (c) menopausal status. Although the number of patients treated is small, and follow-up time is limited, these early results support the contention that the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ by excision and irradiation is an acceptable alternative to mastectomy. We urge caution in treating patients with the comedocarcinoma subtype and counsel these patients to have more treatment than excision alone.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 06/1993; 26(3):391-6. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(93)90955-U · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • E.E. Klein · Robert R. Kuske
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Subcutaneous prosthetic implants had been routinely used for cosmetic augmentation and for tissue replacement following mastectomy over the last 15 years. The implants come in many forms as the gel filler material and surrounding shell material(s) vary significantly. This study uses a thin window parallel-plate chamber and thermoluminescent dosimeters to quantify and dosimetric changes to surrounding breast tissue due to the presence of the prosthesis. A mammographic phantom was compared to four commercial prostheses, namely two silicon gel fillers within two different shells (silicon or silicon/polyurethane), a tri-glyceride within silicon and a bio-oncotic gel within silicon/polyurethane. The latter two implants were designed with a low-Z fill for diagnostic imaging benefits. Ion chamber results indicate no significant alteration of depth doses away from the implant with only minor canceling (parallel opposed) interface perturbations for all implants. In addition the physical changes to the irradiated prostheses were quantified by tonometry testing and qualified by color change. Each implant exhibited color change following 50 Gy, and the bio-oncotic gel became significantly less formable following irradiation, and even less formable 6 weeks postirradiation. The data indicates that prostheses do not affect the photon beam distribution, but radiation does affect the prostheses.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 03/1993; 25(3):541-9. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(93)90078-A · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology 02/1993; 27:62-88.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The records of 55 patients who had breast cancer treated by mastectomy, irradiation, and breast reconstruction were reviewed for cosmetic outcome, complications, and tumor control. Median follow-up was 35 months. Local control rates were 95 percent in patients treated for high risk factors or breast conservation and 85 percent in patients treated for recurrent breast cancer. Acceptable cosmetic results were obtained in only 42 percent of patients. The incidence of complications was 55 percent. Transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) reconstructions gave superior cosmetic results compared with all other types of reconstructions. The timing of reconstruction in relation to mastectomy or radiation therapy did not significantly influence cosmetic outcome, although other factors suggest that delayed reconstruction may give better results. A majority of patients were satisfied with cosmetic outcome.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 10/1992; 90(3):445-52; discussion 453-4. DOI:10.1097/00006534-199209000-00014 · 2.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The records of 55 patients who had breast cancer treated by mastectomy, irradiation, and breast reconstruction were reviewed for cosmetic outcome, complications, and tumor control. Median follow-up was 35 months. Local control rates were 95 percent in patients treated for high risk factors or breast conservation and 85 percent in patients treated for recurrent breast cancer. Acceptable cosmetic results were obtained in only 42 percent of patients. The incidence of complications was 55 percent. Transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) reconstructions gave superior cosmetic results compared with all other types of reconstructions. The timing of reconstruction in relation to mastectomy or radiation therapy did not significantly influence cosmetic outcome, although other factors suggest that delayed reconstruction may give better results. A majority of patients were satisfied with cosmetic outcome. (C)1992American Society of Plastic Surgeons
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 09/1992; 90(3):445-452. DOI:10.1097/00006534-199209000-00013 · 2.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of systemic therapy in addition to irradiation for locoregional recurrence of breast cancer is controversial. In the absence of prospective randomized trials, treatment decisions must be based on retrospective studies. We retrospectively analyzed 230 patients treated for locoregionally recurrent breast cancer between 1964 and 1986. Forty-seven were premenopausal, 173 were postmenopausal, and the menopausal status was unknown in 10 patients. Each patient treated with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy or with RT and hormonal therapy was matched with a control patient treated with RT alone. The addition of hormonal therapy to radiation therapy significantly improved the 5-year overall survival (50 versus 28%), disease-free survival (37 versus 26%), and distant metastases-free survival (45 versus 29%). No improvement in locoregional control was observed. In contrast, chemotherapy did not confer such survival benefits, but there was a trend towards improvement in 5-year locoregional control (68 versus 50%), p = 0.08. Our data support the use of hormonal therapy along with RT at the time of locoregional recurrence of breast cancer. Although our data suggest that chemotherapy is not routinely indicated, controlled clinical trials are needed to define which subsets of patients, if any, benefit from systemic therapy.
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology 05/1992; 15(2):93-101. DOI:10.1097/00000421-199204000-00001 · 3.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although prognostic variables for locoregional recurrence of breast cancer have been evaluated by univariate analysis, multifactorial analysis has not been previously performed. In the present study, survival following chest wall and/or regional lymphatic recurrence was determined in 230 patients with locoregionally recurrent breast cancer without evidence of distant metastases treated at the Radiation Oncology Center, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and affiliated hospitals. Multifactorial analysis demonstrated that the site of recurrences correlated most strongly with overall survival (p = 0.001). The 5-year actuarial overall survival was 44-49% for patients with isolated chest wall, axillary, and internal mammary lymph node recurrence. Patients with either supraclavicular, multiple lymphatic, or concomitant chest wall and lymphatic recurrence had an 21-24% 5-year overall survival. The 5-year disease-free survival was 28-37% for patients with chest wall, axillary, or internal mammary recurrences compared to 4-13% for those with supraclavicular, chest wall and lymphatic, or those with multiple sites of lymphatic recurrence. Disease-free interval from mastectomy to recurrence was also found to be a significant prognostic factor for overall survival (p = 0.005). Fifty percent of patients with a disease-free interval of at least 2 years survived 5 years following locoregional relapse, compared to 35% for those with disease-free interval of less than 2 years. In the subset of patients with small chest wall recurrences (excised or less than 3 cm) and a disease-free interval of at least 2 years, the 5-year overall and disease-free survivals were 67% and 54%, respectively. These results suggest that subsets of patients with locoregional recurrence of breast cancer can survive for long periods of time. The conventional wisdom that chest wall and/or regional nodal recurrence following mastectomy uniformly confers a dismal prognosis is not necessarily true.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 02/1992; 23(2):285-91. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(92)90743-2 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hemibody irradiation (HBI) in a single exposure is an effective and safe technique for palliation of symptoms due to widespread bony metastases (RTOG 78-10). The present study (82-06) sought to explore the possibility that HBI added to local-field irradiation might delay the onset of metastases in the hemibody effected, as assessed by bone scans and X rays, and decrease the frequency of further treatment. The results of this clinical trial establish that 800 cGy of HBI is indeed causes micro-metastases to regress, perhaps completely. A total of 499 patients were randomized to receive either HBI or no further treatment following completion of standard palliative local field irradiation (300 cGy x 10) to the symptomatic site. Improvement was seen in time-to-disease progression at one year, 35% for local + HBI versus 46% on the local-only control arm. Time-to-new disease in the targeted hemibody was also improved. At one year, 50% of patients on the local + HBI arm showed new disease compared to 68% on the local-only arm. Furthermore, the median time-to-new disease within the targeted HBI area was 12.6 months for the local + HBI arm versus 6.3 months for patients in the local-only arm. Time-to-new treatment within the hemibody segment was also delayed. At one year, 76% of the local only group had been retreated versus 60% in the local + HBI arm. There were no fatalities and no radiation pneumonitis was seen in the local + HBI arm. Overall, the incidence of toxicities was low (5-15%). The occurrence of severe hematopoetic toxicities were significantly different in the local + HBI arm, but they were transitory. One life-threatening thrombocytopenia occurred, for a limited time, indicating excellent tolerance to HBI. This clinical trial demonstrates that HBI has the potential to be used to treat systemic and occult metastases, particularly if both halves of the body can be treated.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 02/1992; 23(1):207-14. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(92)90563-W · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: From December 1984 to December 1989, 240 superficially located recurrent/metastatic malignant lesions (173 patients) were enrolled in a prospective randomized study of one versus two hyperthermia fractions per week. In the majority of patients, the dose of radiation therapy was less than 4000 cGy over 4 to 5 weeks. Stratification was by tumor size, site, and histology. The goal of the hyperthermia sessions were 42.5 degrees C for 45-60 min minimum intra-tumor measured temperature. Hyperthermia was given after radiation within 30-60 min. External applicators, both microwave (over 90% of treatments) and ultrasound, were used. Overall, complete response rate in 222 evaluable lesions was 56.3% (125/222) with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and a maximum follow-up of 52 months. The complete response rate for once a week versus twice a week hyperthermia group was 54.7% and 57.8%, respectively. The severe complication rate was 18% (41/222). There was no difference between the two treatment arms. Cox regression analyses were performed to study the prognostic significance of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, and treatment parameters. Detailed analysis and results are presented.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 02/1992; 24(1):145-52. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(92)91034-K · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • Eric E. Klein · Robert R. Kuske
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 12/1991; 21:228-229. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90638-K · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Immediate or delayed reconstruction using implants or autologous tissue transfer is increasingly offered to women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Some patients require radiotherapy for prevention of local/regional relapse, and some for post-surgical local/regional recurrence. Others with augmented breasts may opt for conservative surgery and irradiation. At Washington University, 70 breast cancers were irradiated in 66 patients following mastectomy with reconstruction (N = 61) or wide local excision of an augmented breast (N = 5). Two patients elected to have a second reconstruction after an unsatisfactory initial result. Thus, 72 breasts were evaluated after radiotherapy for tumor control, complications, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction. Locoregional failure occurred in only five patients, one following adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy with reconstruction and four following radiotherapy for recurrent breast cancer within a reconstructed breast. Grade 2 or 3 complications occurred in 34 patients (51%). The complication rate was highest in autologous tissue transfer reconstructions. Cosmetic results were evaluated good/excellent in 49% by physicians and 67% by patients. Immediate reconstructions had fewer good/excellent physician evaluations (32%) compared with reconstructions performed at least 6 weeks after radiotherapy (55%). Transverse rectus abdominis flaps had the best cosmesis scores, followed by permanent silicone prostheses, tissue expanders, latissimus dorsi, and gluteal flaps. Only 48% of patients would choose to have the same reconstructive procedure again. Phantom interface dosimetry with a parallel plate chamber and TLD measurements was performed. Radiotherapy and reconstruction are not incompatible, but careful consideration of their relative timing and technique appear to be important in optimizing cosmesis while minimizing complications.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 08/1991; 21(2):339-46. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90780-8 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: From 1968-1987 237 women with Stage III, noninflammatory breast cancer were treated with various modalities. Ninety-three (39%) had Stage IIIA tumors, and 144 (61%) had Stage IIIB, noninflammatory tumors (AJC, 1983 staging). Median follow-up was 5.4 years (range 2 to 22 years). No patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-five patients (15%) were treated with irradiation alone, 27 (11%) with irradiation and adjuvant systemic therapy, 80 (34%) with mastectomy and irradiation, and 95 (40%) with combined mastectomy, irradiation, and systemic therapy. Local/regional control by treatment at 5 and 10 years, respectively, was 31% and 31% for irradiation alone, 47% and 47% for irradiation and systemic therapy, 80% and 80% for irradiation and mastectomy, and 93% and 78% for irradiation, mastectomy, and systemic therapy (p less than .0001). Actuarial disease-free survival by treatment was 19% and 12% for irradiation alone, 25% and 18% for irradiation and systemic therapy, 34% and 20% for irradiation and mastectomy, and 41% and 31% for irradiation, mastectomy, and systemic therapy, at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p = .0001). Patients given systemic therapy and/or irradiation prior to mastectomy had a better local/regional control and DFS and actuarial survival, although not achieving statistical significance (p = 0.10). Of the triple modality group of patients, there were no chest wall failures with chest wall doses greater than 5040 cGy (p = 0.3). There were 40/237 (17%) grade 2 or greater treatment sequelae. The administration of chemotherapy significantly increased complications.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 08/1991; 21(2):311-8. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90776-Z · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • R R Kuske
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A decade of experience with the oncology course offered within the second year pathophysiology curriculum at the Washington University School of Medicine is reviewed. The number of classroom hours allotted to this course has steadily decreased from 28 to 6 hours. Causes of this downward trend include the introduction of new subject matter into the curriculum and the desire for more independent study time. Strategies for maintaining or increasing the number of lecture hours are discussed. Videotaping the principles of surgical, medical, and radiation oncology enables the coursemaster to return the classroom emphasis to the patient as illustration.
    Journal of Cancer Education 02/1991; 6(2):69-72. DOI:10.1080/08858199109528094 · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two hundred twenty-four patients with their first, isolated local-regional recurrence of breast cancer were irradiated with curative intent. Patients who had previous chest wall or regional lymphatic irradiation were not included in the study. With a median follow-up of 46 months (range 24 to 241 months), the 5- and 10-year survival for the entire group were 43% and 26%, respectively. Overall, 57% of the patients were projected to be loco-regionally controlled at 5 years. The 5-year local-regional tumor control was best for patients with isolated chest wall recurrences (63%), intermediate for nodal recurrences (45%), and poor for concomitant chest wall and nodal recurrences (27%). In patients with solitary chest wall recurrences, large field radiotherapy encompassing the entire chest wall resulted in a 5- and 10-year freedom from chest wall re-recurrence of 75% and 63% in contrast to 36% and 18% with small field irradiation (p = 0.0001). For the group with recurrences completely excised, tumor control was adequate at all doses ranging from 4500 to 7000 cGy. For the recurrences less than 3 cm, 100% were controlled at doses greater than or equal to 6000 cGy versus 76% at lower doses. No dose response could be demonstrated for the larger lesions. The supraclavicular failure rate was 16% without elective radiotherapy versus 6% with elective radiotherapy (p = 0.0489). Prophylactic irradiation of the uninvolved chest wall decreased the subsequent re-recurrence rate (17% versus 27%), but the difference is not statistically significant (p = .32). The incidence of chest wall re-recurrence was 12% with doses greater than or equal to 5000 cGy compared to 27% with no elective radiotherapy, but again was not statistically significant (p = .20). Axillary and internal mammary failures were infrequent, regardless of prophylactic treatment. Although the majority of patients with local and/or regional recurrence of breast cancer will eventually develop distant metastases and succumb to their disease, a significant percentage will live 5 years. Therefore, aggressive radiotherapy should be used to provide optimal local-regional control.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 11/1990; 19(4):851-8. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(90)90004-4 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sixty tumors with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were treated with radiation and superficial microwave hyperthermia (915 MHz). The overall local control rate was 50% (30/60). The most important factor in outcome was appropriateness of the hyperthermia applicator. Tumors covered by at least the 25% iso-SAR contour achieved 65% local control versus 21% local control with less than 25% SAR coverage (p less than 0.01). Several measures of adequate minimum monitored tumor temperature and duration were considered. The measure best correlated with outcome was best single session time at or above 43 degrees C (t43). If each monitored tumor catheter achieved t43 greater than or equal to 30 minutes in at least one session, then tumor control was significantly (p less than 0.01) improved (63% with Min t43 greater than or equal to 30 versus 25% with Min t43 less than 30). Although there was considerable overlap between tumors with SAR greater than or equal to 25% and those achieving Min t43 greater than or equal to 30, a statistically significant (p = 0.02) difference could be demonstrated between the group meeting both the SAR and the minimum tumor time/duration standards as opposed to those meeting only one standard. The actuarial local progression-free survival for tumors most likely to have had adequate hyperthermia (defined as SAR greater than or equal to 25% and Min t43 greater than or equal to 30) and all other tumors did not begin to separate significantly until 8 to 12 months after treatment. Implications for future randomized studies are discussed.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 06/1990; 18(5):1123-9. DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(90)90448-S · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty-three patients with advanced gynecologic malignancy were treated with definitive irradiation and synchronous sensitizing chemotherapy (CT) consisting of cisplatin (CDDP), 50 mg/m2 i.v. rapid infusion, and a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 750 mg/m2/day. A total of three cycles were administered every 3-4 weeks. Fifteen patients had primary cervical epidermoid carcinoma (three bulky stage IIB, one stage IIIA, ten stage IIIB, one stage IV), four had pelvic recurrences of carcinoma of the cervix, two had endometrial adenocarcinomas (stage IV), and two had vulvar epidermoid carcinoma (one stage III and one stage IV). Radiotherapy (RT) for implantable tumors consisted of 2,000 cGy whole pelvis, 3,000-4,000 cGy split field, and two intracavitary or interstitial insertions, resulting in a total dose of 7,500-8,000 cGy to point A. Three courses of CT were delivered simultaneously with irradiation of the central bulk of tumor: during the first week of whole pelvis RT and with each of the two brachytherapy procedures. Nonimplantable tumors were treated with protracted external beam RT (5,500 cGy tumor dose) and three courses of CT during weeks 1, 4, and 7 of RT. Twenty-one of 23 patients completed RT and 18 of 23 patients completed CT as planned, but half had delays in either RT or CT. Grade 2 or 3 late sequelae consisted of leg edema (one patient), proctosigmoiditis (one patient), bowel obstruction (one patient), vesicovaginal fistula (one patient), and pulmonary embolus (two--one fatal). The incidence of grade 2 and 3 sequelae were 18 and 22%, respectively. With 1-3 years of follow-up evaluation, 12 of 23 (52%) patients are free of disease, and 9 of 22 evaluable patients (41%) have had failure within the pelvis. We conclude that high-dose definitive RT can be delivered with synchronous CDDP and 5-FU at the doses given, with acceptable toxicity. Further study is required to evaluate the impact of radiosensitization on tumor control and late morbidity of therapy. Optimization of irradiation and drug doses as well as the best schedules that may enhance the interaction of these two modalities should be further investigated.
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology 01/1990; 12(6):467-73. · 3.06 Impact Factor