-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Delirium, an acute altered level of cognition, is a frequent complication of medical illness in the elderly. Antipsychotic medications (APs) are often used to treat agitation and psychosis in delirium. The goal of this study is to compare mortality in delirious elderly medical inpatients treated with APs with those who did not receive APs.
326 elderly hospitalized patients were identified with delirium at an acute care community hospital. A nested case-control analysis was conducted on this cohort. Cases consisted of all patients who died in hospital within eight weeks of admission. Each case was matched for age and severity of illness to patients (controls) alive on the same day post-admission. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the impact of exposure to AP on mortality. Covariates used for adjustment were the Charlson comorbidity score and the acute physiology score. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the regression coefficients.
111 patients received an AP. A total of 62 patients died, 16 of whom were exposed to an AP. The OR of association between AP use and death was 1.53 (95% C.I, 0.83-2.80) in univariate and 1.61 (95% C.I, 0.88-2.96) in multivariate analysis.
In elderly medical inpatients with delirium, administration of APs was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of mortality. Larger studies are needed to clarify the safety of AP medication in elderly patients with delirium.
International Psychogeriatrics 05/2009; 21(3):588-92. · 2.24 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine the effectiveness of a two-stage (screening and nursing assessment) intervention for older patients in the emergency department (ED) who are at increased risk of functional decline and other adverse outcomes.
Controlled trial, randomized by day of ED visit, with follow-up at 1 and 4 months.
Four university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal.
Patients age 65 and older expected to be released from the ED to the community with a score of 2 or more on the Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR) screening tool and their primary family caregivers. One hundred seventy-eight were randomized to the intervention, 210 to usual care.
The intervention consisted of disclosure of results of the ISAR screen, a brief standardized nursing assessment in the ED, notification of the primary care physician and home care providers, and other referrals as needed. The control group received usual care, without disclosure of the screening result.
Patient outcomes assessed at 4 months after enrollment included functional decline (increased dependence on the Older American Resources and Services activities of daily living scale or death) and depressive symptoms (as assessed by the short Geriatric Depression Scale). Caregiver outcomes, also assessed at baseline and 4 months, included the physical and mental summary scales of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with care were assessed 1 month after enrollment.
The intervention increased the rate of referral to the primary care physician and to home care services. The intervention was associated with a significantly reduced rate of functional decline at 4 months, in both unadjusted (odds ratio (OR) = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.36-0.99) and adjusted (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.31-0.91) analyses. There was no intervention effect on patient depressive symptoms, caregiver outcomes, or satisfaction with care.
A two-stage ED intervention, consisting of screening with the ISAR tool followed by a brief, standardized nursing assessment and referral to primary and home care services, significantly reduced the rate of subsequent functional decline.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 11/2001; 49(10):1272-81. · 3.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the relationship of environmental risk factors in hospitals to changes over time in delirium symptom severity scores.
Observational prospective clinical study with repeated measurements, several times during the first week of hospitalization and then weekly during hospitalization.
University-affiliated general community hospital.
Four hundred forty-four patients age 65 and older admitted to the medical wards: 326 with delirium and 118 without delirium. Patients with prior cognitive impairment were oversampled.
The severity of delirium symptoms was measured with the Delirium Index, a scale developed and validated by our group, based on the Confusion Assessment Method. Potential environmental risk factors assessed included isolation, hospital unit, room changes, levels of sensory stimulation, aids to orientation, and presence of medical (e.g., intravenous) or physical restraints.
Controlling for initial severity of delirium and patient characteristics, variables significantly related to an increase in delirium severity scores included hospital unit (intensive care or long-term care unit), number of room changes, absence of a clock or watch, absence of reading glasses, presence of a family member, and presence of medical or physical restraints.
The associations of intensive care and medical and physical restraints with severity of delirium symptoms may be due to uncontrolled confounding by indication. However, the other factors identified suggest potentially modifiable risk factors for symptoms of delirium in hospitalized older people.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 11/2001; 49(10):1327-34. · 3.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Delirium in older hospital inpatients appears to be associated with various adverse outcomes. The limitations of previous research on this association have included small sample sizes, short follow-up periods and lack of consideration of important confounders or modifiers, such as severity of illness, comorbidity and dementia. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of delirium, with or without dementia, for cognitive and functional status during the 12 months after hospital admission, independent of premorbid function, comorbidity, severity of illness and other potentially confounding variables.
Patients 65 years of age and older who were admitted from the emergency department to the medical services were screened for delirium during their first week in hospital. Two cohorts were enrolled: patients with prevalent or incident delirium and patients without delirium, but similar in age and cognitive impairment. The patients were followed up at 2, 6 and 12 months after hospital admission. Analyses were conducted for 4 patient groups: 56 with delirium, 53 with dementia, 164 with both conditions and 42 with neither. Baseline measures included delirium (Confusion Assessment Method), dementia (Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly), physical function (Barthel Index [BI] and premorbid instrumental activities of daily living, IADL), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), comorbidity, and physiologic and clinical severity of illness. Outcome variables measured at follow-up were the MMSe, Barthel Index, IADL and admission to a long-term care facility.
After adjustment for covariates, the mean differences in MMSE scores at follow-up between patients with and without delirium were -4.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] -7.17 to -2.81) for patients with dementia and -3.36 (95% CI -6.15 to -0.58) for those without dementia. At 12 months, the adjusted mean differences in the BI were -16.45 (95% CI -27.42 to -5.50) and -13.89 (95% CI -28.39 to 0.61) for patients with and without dementia respectively. Patients with both delirium and dementia were more likely to be admitted to long-term care than those with neither condition (adjusted odds ratio 3.18, 95% CI 1.19 to 8.49). Dementia but not delirium predicted worse IADL scores at follow-up. Unadjusted analyses yielded similar results.
For older patients with and without dementia, delirium is an independent predictor of sustained poor cognitive and functional status during the year after a medical admission to hospital.
Canadian Medical Association Journal 10/2001; 165(5):575-83. · 8.22 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study compared residential addiction treatment clients meeting full DSM-III-R criteria for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) with those reporting syndromal levels of antisocial behavior only in adulthood (AABS) on time to and severity of first posttreatment drug use. Antisocial syndrome and selected other mental disorders were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Revised for DSM-III-R, and validity of self-reported posttreatment drug behavior was measured against results of hair analysis. Among subjects followed within 180 days after treatment exit, individuals with ASPD were at modestly increased risk of a first lapse episode compared to those with AABS. However, the two groups did not differ in severity of lapse. Participants with ASPD demonstrated poorer agreement between self-reported posttreatment drug behavior and hair data. These results add to the evidence suggesting that the DSM requirement for childhood onset in ASPD may be clinically important among substance abusers in identifying a severely antisocial and chronically addicted group at elevated risk for early posttreatment recidivism. Our findings support the importance of careful classification of antisocial syndromes among substance abusers and the identification of characteristics of these syndromes that underlie clients' risks for posttreatment return to drug use to provide optimally individualized treatment planning.
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 09/2001; 27(3):453-82. · 1.55 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND/LITERATURE REVIEW: The prevalence of agitated behaviors in different populations with dementia is between 24% and 98%. Although agitated behaviors are potentially disruptive, little research attention has been focused on the effects of these behaviors upon nursing staff. The objectives of this study of demented patients in long-term-care beds at an acute care community hospital were to determine the frequency and disruptiveness of agitated behaviors; to investigate the associations of patient characteristics and interventions with the level of agitation; and to explore the burden of these agitated behaviors on nursing staff.
The study sample comprised 56 demented patients in the long-term-care unit during the study period. Twenty-seven staff who cared for these patients during three shifts over a 2-week period were interviewed to rate the frequency and disruptiveness of agitated behaviors using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, and the burden of care using a modified version of the Zarit Burden Interview. Data on patient characteristics and interventions extracted from the hospital chart included scores on the Barthel Index and Mini-Mental State Examination, the use of psychotropic medication, and the use of physical restraints.
Ninety-five percent of the patients with dementia were reported to have at least one agitated behavior; 75% had at least one moderately disruptive behavior. A small group of six patients (11%) had 17 or more disruptive behaviors. The frequency of most behaviors did not vary significantly by shift. Length of stay on long-term care, Barthel Index score, and the use of psychotropic medications were significantly associated with the number of agitated behaviors. The number of behaviors, their mean frequency, and their mean disruptiveness were all significantly correlated with staff burden.
The prevalence of agitated behaviors in patients with dementia in long-term-care beds at an acute care hospital is similar to that reported in long-term-care facilities. These behaviors are associated with staff burden.
International Psychogeriatrics 07/2001; 13(2):183-97. · 2.24 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Use of anticholinergic (ACH) medications is a biologically plausible and potentially modifiable risk factor of delirium, but research findings are conflicting regarding its association with delirium.
To evaluate the longitudinal association between use of ACH medications and severity of delirium symptoms and to determine whether this association is modified by the presence of dementia.
A total of 278 medical inpatients 65 years and older with diagnosed incident or prevalent delirium were followed up with repeated assessments using the Delirium Index for up to 3 weeks. Exposure to ACH and other medications was measured daily. The association between change in medication exposure in the 24 hours preceding a Delirium Index assessment was assessed using a mixed linear regression model.
During follow-up (mean +/- SD, 12.3 +/- 7.0 days), 47 medications with potential ACH effect were used in the population (mean, 1.4 medications per patient per day). Increase in delirium severity was significantly associated with several measures of ACH medication exposure on the previous day, adjusting for dementia, baseline delirium severity, length of follow-up, and number of non-ACH medications taken. Dementia did not modify the association between ACH medication use and delirium severity.
Exposure to ACH medications is independently and specifically associated with a subsequent increase in delirium symptom severity in elderly medical inpatients with diagnosed delirium.
Archives of Internal Medicine 05/2001; 161(8):1099-105. · 11.46 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of antidepressive treatments for post-stroke depression in elderly medical inpatients, MEDLINE was searched for potentially relevant articles published from January 1987 to August 1997 using the keywords "depression or depressive disorder" (exploded) and "aged." Thirteen reports met the following inclusion criteria: (1) published in English or French; (2) minimum age criterion of 55 and over or mean age 65 and over; (3) post-stroke subjects admitted to a medical, geriatric, or rehabilitation service; (4) used accepted criteria for depression; (5) examined treatment(s) for depression; and (6) reported outcomes as a depression diagnosis and/or symptom level. Data were abstracted independently from each article by two reviewers. The limited evidence suggests contraindications to treatment of 83% of a group to receive a heterocyclic antidepressant compared with 11% of a group to receive a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI); rates of discontinuation and study completion are similar for heterocyclics, SSRIs and psychostimulants. All of the treatments appear to be at least modestly effective in the short term.
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 02/2001; 14(1):37-41. · 3.07 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of treatments for depressed elderly medical inpatients, MEDLINE was searched for potentially relevant articles published from January 1987 to August 1997, using the keywords "depression or depressive disorder" (exploded) and "aged." The bibliographies of relevant articles were searched for additional references. Fifteen reports met the following inclusion criteria: (a) published in English or French; (b) minimum age criterion of 55 and over or mean age 65 and over; (c) subjects admitted to the medical service of an acute care hospital; (d) used accepted criteria for depression; (e) examined treatment(s) for depression; and (f) reported outcomes as a depression diagnosis and/or symptom level. Information was abstracted independently from each article by two reviewers, tabulated, and compared. The limited evidence suggests contraindications to treatment in 38% to 87% of subjects who received a heterocyclic antidepressant compared to 4% of subjects who received the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine; rates of discontinuation and study completion were similar for heterocyclics, the SSRIs, and psychostimulants. All of the treatments (including social support/psychotherapy) appeared to be at least modestly effective in the short term.
International Psychogeriatrics 01/2001; 12(4):453-61. · 2.24 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A simple screening tool, Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR), developed for administration in the emergency department for patients 65 years and older, predicts adverse health outcomes during the 6 months after the ED visit. In this study, we investigated whether the ISAR tool can also predict acute care hospital utilization in the same population.
Patients 65 years and older who visited the EDs of 4 acute care Montreal hospitals during the weekday shift over a 3-month period were enrolled. At the initial (index) ED visit, 27 self-report screening questions (including the 6 ISAR items) were administered. The number of acute care hospital days during the 6 months after the index visit were abstracted from the provincial hospital discharge database. High utilization was defined as the top decile of the distribution of acute care hospital days.
Among 1,620 patients with linked data, a score of 2+ on the ISAR tool predicted high hospital utilization with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 51%; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68. The ISAR tool also performed well in subgroups defined by disposition (admitted versus discharged) and by age (65 to 74 years versus 75 years and older).
The ISAR tool, a 6-item self-report questionnaire, can be used in the ED to identify elderly patients who will experience high acute care hospital utilization as well as adverse health outcomes.
Annals of Emergency Medicine 12/2000; 36(5):438-45. · 4.13 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Delirium is a complex medical disorder associated with high morbidity and mortality among elderly patients. The goals of our study were to determine the prevalence of delirium in emergency department (ED) patients aged 65 years and over and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a conventional clinical assessment by an ED physician for the detection of delirium in the same population.
All elderly patients presenting to the ED in a primary acute care, university-affiliated hospital who were triaged to the observation room on a stretcher because of the severity of their illness were screened for delirium by a research psychiatrist using the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Confusion Assessment Method. The diagnosis of "delirium" or an equivalent term by the ED physician was determined by 2 methods: completion of a mental status checklist by the ED physician and chart review. The prevalence of delirium and the sensitivity and specificity of the ED physician's clinical assessment were calculated with their 95% confidence intervals. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with detected delirium and those with undetected delirium were compared.
A sample of 447 patients was screened. The prevalence of delirium was 9.6% (95% confidence interval 6.9%-12.4%). The sensitivity of the detection of delirium by the ED physician was 35.3% and the specificity, 98.5%. Most patients with delirium had neurologic or pulmonary diseases, and most patients with detected delirium had neurologic diseases.
Despite the relatively high prevalence of delirium in elderly ED patients, the sensitivity of a conventional clinical assessment for this condition is low. There is a need to improve the detection of delirium by ED physicians.
Canadian Medical Association Journal 11/2000; 163(8):977-81. · 8.22 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To estimate the annual rate of change scores (ARC) on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to identify study or population characteristics that may affect the ARC estimation.
MEDLINE was searched for articles published from January 1981 to November 1997 using the following keywords: AD and longitudinal study or prognosis or cognitive decline. The bibliographies of review articles and relevant papers were searched for additional references. All retrieved articles were screened to meet the following inclusion criteria: (a) original study; (b) addressed cognitive decline or prognosis or course of AD; (c) published in English; (d) study population included AD patients with ascertainable sample size; (e) used either clinical or pathological diagnostic criteria; (f) longitudinal study design; and (g) used the MMSE as one of the outcome measures. Data were systematically abstracted from the included studies, and a random effects regression model was employed to synthesize relevant data across studies and to evaluate the effects of study methodology on ARC estimation and its effect size.
Of the 439 studies screened, 43 met all the inclusion criteria. After 6 studies with inadequate or overlapping data were excluded, 37 studies involving 3,492 AD patients followed over an average of 2 years were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of ARC was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9-3.7). The observed variability in ARC across studies could not be explained with the covariates we studied, whereas part of the variability in the effect size of ARC could be explained by the minimum MMSE score at entry and number of assessments.
A pooled average estimate of ARC in AD patients was 3.3 points (95% CI: 2.9-3.7) on the MMSE. Significant heterogeneity of ARC estimates existed across the studies and cannot be explained by the study or population characteristics investigated. Effect size of ARC was related to the initial MMSE score of the study population and the number of assessments.
International Psychogeriatrics 07/2000; 12(2):231-47. · 2.24 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: 1) To describe the pattern of return visits to the emergency department (ED) among elders over the six months following an index visit; 2) to identify the predictors of early return (within 30 days) and frequent return (three or more return visits in six months); and 3) to evaluate a newly developed screening tool for functional decline, Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR), with regard to its ability to predict return visits.
Subjects were patients aged 65 years or more who visited the EDs of four Canadian hospitals during the weekday shift over a three-month recruitment period. Excluded were patients who: could not be interviewed, due either to their medical conditions or to cognitive impairment, and no other informant was available; refused linkage of study data; or were admitted to hospital at the initial (index) visit. Measures made at the index ED visit included: 27 self-report screening questions on social, physical, and mental risk factors, medical history, use of hospital services, medications, and alcohol. Six of these questions comprised the ISAR scale. Return visits and diagnoses during the six months after the index visit were abstracted from the utilization database.
Among 1,122 patients released from the ED, 492 (43.9%) made one or more return visits; 216 (19.3%) returned early and 84 (7.5%) returned frequently. Earlier returns were more likely than later returns to be for the same diagnosis (p = 0.003). Using logistic regression, hospitalization during the previous six months, feeling depressed, and certain diagnoses predicted both early and frequent returns. Also, a history of heart disease, having ever been married, and not drinking alcohol daily predicted early return; a history of diabetes, a recent ED visit, and lack of support predicted frequent use.
In the first month after an ED visit, return rates are highest and are more likely to be for the same diagnosis. Both medical and social factors predict early and frequent returns to the ED; patients at increased risk of return can be quickly identified with a short, self-report questionnaire. The ISAR screening tool, developed to identify patients at increased risk of functional decline, can also identify patients who are more likely to return to the ED.
Academic Emergency Medicine 04/2000; 7(3):249-59. · 1.86 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study describes 6- and 12-month outcomes in a referral cohort with anxiety disorders and identifies treatment and prognostic factors related to these outcomes. Patients were recruited at three general hospital clinics, two psychologist-run clinics, and one psychiatric hospital clinic. Outcomes included severity of symptoms, physical and mental health status, and subjective global change in problem severity. Of 254 patients eligible for follow-up, 165 (65.0%) completed a follow-up questionnaire. Methods of treatment included consultation with return to the primary care physician (38.2%); or continued treatment at the clinic, with medications (16.4%), psychotherapy (22.4%), or both (23.0%). Both severity of symptoms and mental health status improved but remained abnormal at follow-up. In multiple logistic regression, subjective global improvement was related to a diagnosis of panic disorder only, treatment with psychotherapy, and type of referral. Change over time in symptom severity was related to clinic type, and change over time in mental health was related to clinic type and duration of previous treatment.
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease 02/2000; 188(1):3-12. · 1.68 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to determine the validity of French and English versions of the Older American Resources and Services (OARS) activities of daily living (ADL) questionnaire using a premorbid reference period among older emergency department (ED) patients. A sample of 404 ED patients aged 65 and over participating in a study of functional decline was invited to participate in a clinical assessment shortly after their ED visit. The OARS ADL questionnaire was administered either to the patient or a proxy informant at the ED visit. The clinical assessment was conducted by a nurse, blind to the OARS score, using the Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF). Disability scores for the OARS and SMAF were computed, based on the patient's premorbid status. Assessments were conducted in 213 patients (52.7%). The OARS summary scores, a total and an ordinal score, were highly correlated with the SMAF total disability score (Spearman's r of 0.80 and 0.79, respectively). Similar correlations were found for French and English versions. The OARS ADL questionnaire with a premorbid reference period appears to be valid when administered in the ED, both in French and English.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 12/1999; 52(11):1023-30. · 4.27 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To develop a self-report screening tool to identify older people in the emergency department (ED) of a hospital at increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including: death, admission to a nursing home or long-term hospitalization, or a clinically significant decrease in functional status.
Prospective (6-month) follow-up study of a cohort of ED patients aged 65 and older.
The EDs of four acute-care hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Community-dwelling patients aged 65 and older who came to the EDs during the weekday shift over a 3-month recruitment period. Patients were excluded if they could not be interviewed either because of their medical condition or because of cognitive impairment and no other informant was available.
Measures ascertained at the ED visit included: 27 self-report screening questions on social, physical, and mental risk factors; medical history; use of hospital services, medications, and alcohol; and the Older American Resources and Services (OARS) activities of daily living (ADL) scale. At follow-up, the OARS scale was readministered by telephone, and other adverse health outcomes were ascertained.
Among 1673 patients who completed the follow-up measures, 488 (29.2%) had an adverse health outcome. Scale development and selection methods included logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and expert judgment. The proposed screening tool (ISAR) comprises six self-report questions on functional dependence (premorbid and acute change), recent hospitalization, impaired memory and vision, and polymedication. The tool performed well in the total cohort aged 65 and older, and in sub-groups defined by disposition (admitted or released from ED), language of questionnaire administration (French or English), information source (patient or other), and other characteristics.
The ISAR is a short self-report questionnaire that can quickly identify older patients in the ED at increased risk of several adverse health outcomes and those with current disability.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 11/1999; 47(10):1229-37. · 3.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We compared residential addictions treatment clients meeting full criteria for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD+) with those reporting syndromal levels of antisocial behavior only in adulthood (AABS+) on demographics, antisocial symptomatology, drug history, axis I comorbidity and characteristics of index treatment episode. We examined these issues in the sample as a whole, as well as separately in male and female respondents. Among both men and women, ASPD+ initiated their antisocial behavior earlier, met more ASPD criteria and endorsed more violent symptoms, than AABS+. Male ASPD+ also met criteria for more lifetime axis I diagnoses and reported more years of drug involvement than male AABS+. Trends were observed toward poorer retention in treatment among ASPD+ than among AABS+ participants of both genders randomized to a planned duration of 180 days, but retention did not differ between ASPD+ and AABS+ randomized to a planned duration of 90 days. Our findings, which replicate and extend previously published results, carry potential implications for treatment programming and for the nosology of ASPD.
Drug and Alcohol Dependence 02/1999; 53(2):171-87. · 3.38 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of a new instrument, the Delirium Index (DI), to measure changes in the severity of the symptoms of delirium among patients previously diagnosed with delirium. Subjects were medical inpatients aged 65 and over diagnosed with delirium by the Confusion Assessment Method. Interrater reliability of the DI was .78 between research assistants (concordance coefficient) and was .88 between research assistants and geriatric psychiatrists. Criterion validity, assessed by the correlation between DI and Delirium Rating Scale scores (Spearman's correlation coefficient, r), was .84. Construct validity was assessed using correlations of the DI with two measures of current function for convergent validity (r = -.60, -.70) and two measures of function before admission for discriminant validity (r = .26,-.42). We conclude that the DI has acceptable levels of interrater reliability, criterion validity, and construct validity.
International Psychogeriatrics 01/1999; 10(4):421-33. · 2.24 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objectives of the study were (a) to investigate the characteristics of drug abuse treatment clients who return to treatment and (b) among those with readmissions, to describe changes over time in risk behavior for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and to identify factors associated with behavior change. Data were derived from a multisite HIV surveillance program in a single community; the program used a unique identifier to link HIV test results and behavioral information from multiple contacts. During a 30-month period, 1994 clients were admitted to three satellite facilities of a single treatment agency: detoxification, long-term residential, and outpatient. Of these clients, 574 (29%) had one or more readmissions to the same or a different facility during the 24 months following the index admission. Drug injectors, those tested for HIV, and those living in the community were more likely to be readmitted to treatment. There was little overall change in HIV risk behavior between the index admission and the readmission furthest in time from the index admission. Clients whose index visit was at the residential facility were more likely to reduce their injection risk behavior than those admitted to the other facilities. Clients readmitted to either the residential or the outpatient facility were more likely to have reduced their injection risk behavior than those readmitted to detoxification. Treatment facility was not associated with sexual risk behavior change. Men were more likely than women to reduce their high-risk sexual behaviors. The results underscore the need for treatment programs to make HIV testing readily available to their clients and to make special efforts to assist female clients to reduce their HIV risk.
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 12/1998; 24(4):523-40. · 1.55 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The clinical diagnosis of delirium has traditionally been based on an assessment by one or more physicians. Because of the transient, ubiquitous, and fluctuating nature of the symptoms of delirium, however, this approach may be flawed. Therefore, we decided to compare diagnosis based on one assessment by a psychiatrist, diagnosis by a nurse clinician (using the Confusion Assessment Method [CAM] and multiple observation points), and diagnosis by consensus. The study subjects were 87 patients aged 65 and over who were admitted consecutively from the emergency department to the medical wards, and who scored 3 or more on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. All subjects were assessed independently by one of three psychiatrists (a chart review and clinical examination) and a nurse clinician (using the CAM and multiple observation points). A consensus conference, attended by the three psychiatrists and the nurse clinician, used all available information to reach a consensus diagnosis. Compared to the consensus diagnosis, the clinical diagnosis by a psychiatrist had a sensitivity of .73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .61-.85), a specificity of .93 (95% CI: .79-1.0), and an agreement kappa coefficient of .58 (95% CI: .41-.74). The nurse clinician diagnosis had a sensitivity of .89 (95% CI: .81-.97), a specificity of 1.00, and an agreement kappa coefficient of .86 (95% CI: .75-.97). These results suggest that one clinical assessment by a psychiatrist may not be the best method for detecting and diagnosing delirium in the elderly. A consensus diagnosis or diagnosis by a trained rater (using the CAM and multiple observation points) may be more sensitive approaches.
International Psychogeriatrics 10/1998; 10(3):303-8. · 2.24 Impact Factor
