-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Routine versus selective predonation liver biopsy (LBx) remains controversial for assuring the safety of right hepatic lobe live donor (RHLD). Between December 1999 and March 2007, 403 potential RHLD were evaluated; 142 donated. Indications for selective LBx were: abnormal liver function tests or imaging studies, body mass index (BMI) >28, history of substance abuse or family history of immune mediated liver disease. All donors had a LBx at the time of surgery. Of 403 potential RLD, 149(36.9%) were accepted as donors, 25(6.3%) had their recipient receive a deceased donor graft, 94(23.4%) were rejected, 52(12.9%) stopped the evaluation process, 76(18.8%) withdrew from the process and 7(1.7%) are currently completing evaluation. Eighty-seven (21.5%) met criteria and were biopsied. Seventy-three (83.9%) had either normal (n = 24) or macrosteatosis <10% (n = 49); 51 of these donated. Abnormal LBx eliminated 15 potential donors. No significant abnormalities were found in donation biopsies of donors not meeting algorithm criteria. Three of 87 (3.4%) had complications requiring overnight admission (2 for pain, 1 for bleeding; transfusion not required). Use of this algorithm resulted in 78% of potential donors avoiding biopsy and potential complications. No significant liver pathology was identified in donors not meeting criteria for evaluation LBx. Routine predonation LBx is unnecessary in potential RHLD.
American Journal of Transplantation 04/2008; 8(4):832-8. · 6.39 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Life-threatening hypophosphatemia (phosphorus < 1.0 mg/dL) has been reported only once after liver resection for tumor and was associated with a significant increase in postoperative complications. Hypophosphatemia is associated with reversible cardiac dysfunction, hypoventilation, and impaired immunity. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of hypophosphatemia after elective right hepatic lobectomy for live donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT), investigate the associated complication rate and surgical outcome of live liver donors, and determine the efficacy of prospective treatment with phosphate repletion as part of total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Evaluation of 30 donors who provided 30 right-lobe grafts between December 1998 and January 2000 was performed. Of the initial 18 live liver donors (group 1), 10 donors were treated with TPN that contained slightly more (35 +/- 8 mmol/d) than the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of phosphorus (30 mmol/d) starting on postoperative day 1. The last 12 donors (group 2) were prospectively studied and administered similar TPN with 2 times the RDA for phosphorus (60 mmol/d). All donors in group 1 developed hypophosphatemia that was either life threatening (phosphorus < 1.0 mg/dL) in 70% or severely depleted (phosphorus, 1.5 to 1.1 mg/dL) in 30%. With more aggressive phosphate repletion (group 2), only 8% developed life-threatening (phosphorus < 1.0 mg/dL) hypophosphatemia and 30% developed severe (phosphorus, 1.1 to 1.5 mg/dL) hypophosphatemia. Results suggest that hypophosphatemia is a universal event after LDALT and may have contributed to the observed complications in this study. Repletion of phosphorus at twice the RDA abrogates the incidence of hypophosphatemia and may reduce donor morbidity. Institutions performing LDALT should carefully monitor live liver donors for hypophosphatemia and correct abnormal phosphate levels. Additional studies are needed to determine whether more aggressive parenteral repletion can prevent postoperative hypophosphatemia and thus improve outcomes.
Liver Transplantation 08/2001; 7(7):637-42. · 3.39 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Live donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease.
Case-control study.
Hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation unit.
From December 10, 1998, through April 10, 2000, a single team performed 15 LDALT procedures with 2 simultaneous living donor kidney transplants. During this period, 66 potential donors were screened and evaluated.
Potential donors were evaluated with 3-dimensional helical computed tomographic scan, including volume renderings for hepatic lobar volume, vascular anatomy, virtual resection planes, and morphologic features. Suitable donors undergo complete medical and psychiatric evaluation and preoperative arteriography.
Donor demographics, evaluation data, operative data, hospital length of stay, and morbidity.
A total of 38 men (58%) and 28 women (42%) were evaluated with 15 donors participating in LDALT. Two additional donors provided kidney grafts for simultaneous transplantation at the time of LDALT. Thirty-two donors (48%) were rejected for either donor or recipient reasons, and 10 patients (15%) elected not to participate after initial screening. Three-dimensional volume renderings by helical computed tomographic scan predicted right lobe liver volume within 92% of actual graft volume. Donor morbidity, including all complications, was 67% with no mortality. Residual liver regenerated to approximately 70% of initial volume within 1 week and 80% within 1 month after surgery.
Donor evaluation is an important component of LDALT. Significant donor morbidity is encountered even with careful selection. To minimize donor morbidity, groups considering initiating living donor programs should have expertise in hepatic resection and vena cava preservation using the "piggyback" technique during liver transplantation.
Archives of Surgery 05/2001; 136(4):425-33. · 4.24 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Parenteral iron dextran is efficacious and safe for iron repletion in patients with iron-deficiency anemia. The risk for developing reactions to parenteral iron infusion can be attenuated if patients are carefully selected. Patients with underlying autoimmune disease, malnutrition with indolent infection, and risk for iron overload syndromes should be carefully monitored for complications. Further, the rate of infusion and the route of administration of iron dextran play roles in the risk of adverse reactions. The purpose of this review is to identify and elucidate the mechanisms of the acute and chronic toxicities associated with parenteral iron dextran use.
Kidney international. Supplement 04/1999; 69:S119-24.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Iron deficiency anemia is common among hospitalized patients, and blood losses from diagnostic phlebotomy increase the likelihood of a negative iron balance. The role for iron supplementation of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in these patients is unclear. Twenty-three patients with iron deficiency anemia were identified. Twelve patients were randomized to receive TPN without iron (group 1) and 11 received TPN supplemented with 10 mg of iron as iron dextran daily (group 2). Both groups were matched for age, serum iron studies, red cell indices, and hemogram. After a 7-d period, the mean serum iron in group 2 increased from 10 to 26 micrograms/dL, with an increased transferrin saturation from 7.3 to 15.3% (each, p < 0.05). No changes in total iron binding capacity, ferritin, reticulocyte count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, or mean corpuscular volume were observed in the two groups. The incidence of infectious complications was not different between both groups. We conclude that iron supplementation of TPN appears safe and is effective in increasing serum iron levels. The use of iron-supplemented short-term TPN needs to be further studied given no change in red cell indices, hemoglobin, hematocrit, or transfusion requirement.
Nutrition 07/1996; 12(6):411-5. · 3.03 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Iron dextran was introduced more than 30 yr ago for the parenteral treatment of iron deficiency anemia that is refractory to oral therapy. Iron dextran is a preparation of ferric hydroxide complexed with a low molecular weight fraction of dextran. Iron deficiency anemia is one of the most common nutritional deficiency diseases and occurs worldwide secondary to inadequate dietary iron, usually with excessive gastrointestinal blood losses. Repletion of iron stores is often complicated by intolerance to oral iron supplementation and may require parenteral iron. Parenteral iron can be administered via the intramuscular or intravenous route either directly or as an additive to total parenteral nutrition. Both routes of administration can cause various side effects and a test dose is recommended before therapeutic administration to assess the risk for anaphylaxis. Although the efficacy and safety of parenteral iron dextran have been convincingly demonstrated, supplementation may be contraindicated in the setting of infection.
Nutrition 11(2):163-8. · 3.03 Impact Factor
