-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair has emerged as a treatment option for popliteal artery aneurysms. Our goal was to analyze outcomes of elective and emergency endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm repair (EVPAR). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of clinical data of patients treated with EVPAR at our institution between 2004 and 2010. Stent-related complications, patency, outcome limb salvage, and survival were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS: EVPAR was performed in 31 limbs of 25 patients (mean age, 81 years; range, 65-89 years). Repair was elective in 19 limbs (61%) and emergent in 12 (39%). One aneurysm ruptured and 11 presented with acute thrombosis. All 11 underwent thrombolysis before EVPAR. Patients were implanted with a mean of 2.1 Viabahn stent grafts (range, 1-4). Ten procedures (32%) were performed percutaneously and 21 by femoral cutdown. Technical success was 97%. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.4%, with 0% in the elective group, and 16.7% in the emergent group (P = .14). Early complications included graft thrombosis in two limbs (6.4%) and hematoma in four (13%), all after percutaneous repair. Myocardial infarction and thrombolysis-associated intracranial hemorrhage occurred in one patient each (3.2%). The 30-day primary and secondary patencies were 93.6% and 96.7%, respectively, and were 100% in the elective group and 83.3% and 91.6%, respectively, for the emergent group. Mean follow-up was 21.3 months (range, 1-75 months). Primary patency at 1 year was 86% (95% for elective, 69% for emergent; P = .56), secondary patency at the same time was 91% (elective, 100%; emergent, 91%). One-year limb salvage was 97%. Two-year survival was 91% for the elective group and 73% for the emergent group (P = .15). Five stent occlusions were encountered after 30 days, four in the elective group. Four underwent successful reintervention, two had bypass, and two had thrombolysis, followed by angioplasty. The fifth patient was asymptomatic and nonambulatory and remains under observation. Stent graft infolding occurred in one limb (3.2%), with no clinical sequelae. No stent migration or separation was observed. One stent fracture was noted in an asymptomatic patient. Three (10%) type II endoleaks were detected but none had aneurysm expansion. One (3.2%) type I endoleak was treated percutaneously with placement of an additional stent graft. Overall, major adverse events, including death, graft occlusion with or without reoperation, or reoperation for endoleak or stent infolding occurred after 11 procedures (35.5%). On univariate analysis, no factors predicted stent failure, including runoff, antiplatelet therapy, emergency repair, number of stents implanted, heparin bonding of the stent, or degree of stent oversizing. CONCLUSIONS: These results support elective EVPAR in anatomically suitable patients with increased risk for open repair; however, major adverse events after EVPAR, mainly after emergency repairs, are frequent. A prospective randomized multicenter study to justify EVPAR in the emergent setting is warranted.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 01/2013; · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term patient survival and causes of death after open (OR) or endovascular (ER) mesenteric revascularization for atherosclerotic chronic mesenteric ischemia using propensity score-matched comparison and clinical risk stratification. METHODS: The clinical data of 343 patients treated with mesenteric revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia between 1991 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, anatomical, and procedure-related variables were analyzed using a multivariate model to identify independent predictors of any-cause early and late (>30 days) mortality. Cause of death was retrieved from review of the National Death Index. Patient survival was analyzed using Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) comorbidity scores and propensity score-matched comparison based on independent predictors of any-cause mortality. RESULTS: There were 187 patients treated by OR and 156 patients treated by ER. Early procedure-related mortality was 2.6% (9/343), including five OR (2.7%) and four ER (2.6%) patients. Median follow-up was 96 ± 54 months (range, 1-168 months). There were 144 late deaths, most commonly from cardiac causes in 35% (51/144), followed by cancer in 15% (21/144), pulmonary complications in 13% (19/144), and mesenteric ischemia in 11% (16/144). A further 21 patients died from various identifiable causes, and 14 patients (10%) died of unknown causes. Overall, 25 patients (7.3%) died of mesenteric-related causes, including nine early and 16 late deaths (OR, 10/187; 8.0%, and ER, 6/156; 6.4%). Multivariate analysis identified age >80, diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage IV or V, and home oxygen therapy as independent predictors (P < .05) of any cause of death. Diabetes and CKD stage IV or V were independently associated with mesenteric-related death (P < .05). Late patient survival at 5 years in the OR and ER groups was 75% ± 4% and 60% ± 9% for low SVS risk (<9), 52% ± 8% and 43% ± 9% for intermediate SVS risk (9-16), and 67% ± 15% and 30% ± 8% for high SVS risk (>16). Using propensity matched scores, 5-year survival was nearly identical for patients treated by OR (60%) or ER (57%; P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term patient survival after mesenteric revascularization was not influenced by type of arterial reconstruction. Age >80 years, diabetes, CKD stage IV or V, and home oxygen were independent predictors of any-cause mortality. Diabetes and CKD stage IV or V were independently associated with mesenteric-related death.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 01/2013; · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Primary angiosarcomas originating from the heart, aorta, or great vessels are extremely rare and hence poorly understood. We reviewed our experience to identify a preferred diagnostic and treatment strategy and evaluate the role of adjunctive therapy. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of all patients diagnosed with primary angiosarcoma of the heart, aorta, and great vessels from 1985 to 2011, including presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcomes. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (five males and eight females; mean age, 54 ± 4 years) had primary angiosarcoma arising from the aorta (n = 7), heart (n = 3), pericardium (n = 2), and pulmonary artery (n = 1). Patients with aortic tumors most commonly presented with lower extremity claudication (n = 2), renovascular hypertension (n = 3), abdominal pain (n = 5), and weight loss (n = 4). Patients with cardiac and pericardial tumors presented with dyspnea (n = 5) due to pleural effusion or cardiac tamponade. All 13 patients underwent computed tomographic scan, which demonstrated irregular, lobulated mass/thrombus with peripheral enhancement, and eight patients underwent diagnostic echocardiography. Metastatic disease was present in 10 patients. The most common site was the lungs (n = 6). All except one patient exhibited high-grade morphology histopathologically. Nine patients were treated surgically: resection with aortic reconstruction (n = 5), thromboendarterectomy (n = 2), pericardiectomy/atrial septal resection with patch reconstruction (n = 2), and just biopsy (n = 1). Adjunctive treatment included chemotherapy (n = 6) and radiation (n = 4). Median survival was 8 months (range, 1-75 months). Patients treated with all three treatment modalities had longer survival than did patients treated with a single modality (P = .013). Patients treated with chemotherapy had a more favorable survival than did those without chemotherapy (P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Primary angiosarcoma of the heart and great vessels is rare but is a harbinger of poor prognosis. Pathologic examination is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Combined therapy with surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy offers patients the best survival.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 01/2013; · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The role of common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFE) and the need for distal revascularization is challenging in certain clinical scenarios. For some patients with claudication or rest pain CFE alone may suffice, however, some surgeons advocated that in-line flow must be re-established in patients with major tissue loss for wound healing purposes. The decision when to perform CFE with or without distal revascularization is sometimes difficult. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFE) to define predictive factors for additional distal revascularization.
Retrospective review of 262 consecutive CFEs in 230 patients with lower-extremity ischemia between 1997 and 2008. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (n = 169; CFE alone) and group B (n = 93; CFE + distal revascularization). Concomitant iliac intervention was included only if performed by endovascular approach. Patients were analyzed by Rutherford category (RC) and TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus (TASC) II classification. Primary end points were mortality, patency, reintervention, and limb salvage.
Demographics, preoperative Society for Vascular Surgery score assessment, and TASC II classification did not differ between groups. Mean follow-up was 75 months (range: 1-128 months). Technical success was obtained in all patients. RC (3 ± 1.2 vs. 5 ± 1.4; P = 0.001), diabetes (33% vs. 52%; P = 0.005), mean operative time (+154 minutes; P < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (+1.7 days; P = 0.03) were higher in group B. Reintervention rates were higher in group B than group A (12% vs. 3%; P = 0.015). For patients with RC 5/TASC D lesions and patients with RC 6 regardless of TASC, initial distal revascularization (group B) was associated with fewer reinterventions or major amputations (29%) than CFE alone (67%) (P = 0.002). The cumulative 5-year primary patencies for groups A and group B were 96% and 92%, respectively. Secondary patency was 100% at both time points. Limb salvage was also lower in patients with RC 5 and 6 (P = 0.01; P = 0.02). Overall survival was 93% at 1 year and 77% at 5 years. Independent predictors for distal revascularization were RC 5 or 6 (P < 0.001), TASC D lesions (P < 0.0001), diabetes (P = 0.04), and being on anticoagulation (P = 0.003). There was no difference in survival between the two groups for RC 1 to 5 (P = 0.2), but for patients with RC 6, survival was improved in group B (39% vs. 67%; P = 0.9).
CFE alone is sufficient for patients with lower-extremity ischemia who present with life-limiting claudication regardless of TASC lesion and for those with RC 5 and TASC lesions A to C. Patients with RC 5 and TASC D lesions and those with major tissue loss (RC 6) regardless of TASC lesion are better served with additional distal revascularization to improve limb salvage, reintervention, and survival rates.
Annals of Vascular Surgery 10/2012; 26(7):946-56. · 1.03 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) remains difficult to diagnose, carries a high rate of complications, and is associated with significant mortality. We evaluated our experience with AMI over the last 2 decades to evaluate changes in management and assess current outcomes.
Data from consecutive patients who underwent arterial revascularization for AMI over a 20-year period (January 1990-January 2010) were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, treatment modalities, and outcomes over the last decade (2000-2010) were compared with those of the preceding decade (1990-1999) previously reported.
Over the last 2 decades, 93 patients with AMI underwent emergency arterial revascularization. Forty-five patients were treated during the 1990s and 48 during the 2000s. The majority of these patients were transferred from outside facilities. Patient demographics and risk factors were similar between the 2 decades with the exception that the more contemporary patients were significantly older (65.1 ± 14 vs 71.3 ± 14; P = .04). Etiology remained constant between the groups with in situ thrombosis being the most common followed by arterial embolus. The majority of patients were treated with open revascularization. Endovascular therapy alone or as a hybrid procedure was used in 11 total patients, eight of which were treated in the last 10 years. The use of second-look laparotomy was much more liberal in the last decade (80% vs 48%; P = .003) Thirty-day mortality was 27% in the 1990s and 17% during the 2000s (P = 0.28). Major adverse events occurred in 47% of patients with no difference between decades. There was no significant difference in outcomes between open and endovascular revascularization. On univariate analysis, elevated SVS comorbidity score, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease predicted early death, while a history of chronic mesenteric ischemia appeared protective. On multivariate analysis, no factor independently predicted perioperative mortality. Bowel resection and cerebrovascular disease predicted postoperative morbidity, while advanced age and connective tissue disease predicted long-term mortality.
Morbidity and mortality from AMI continues to be high. Revascularization by endovascular means, although more frequent in the last decade, was still utilized in a minority of patients with severe AMI. Advanced ischemia with bowel infarction at presentation, and markers of generalized atherosclerosis are predictors of poor outcome, while history of chronic mesenteric ischemia is associated with better outcome.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 04/2012; 55(6):1682-9. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Hybrid procedures were introduced as a less invasive alternative to open conventional repair, avoiding thoracotomy, single-lung ventilation, and in many patients, aortic cross-clamping. Despite these potential advantages over open repair, results of hybrid repair have varied in the literature, with several reports indicating high morbidity and mortality rates. It is likely that once fenestrated and branched endografts receive approval from the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use, indications for hybrid repair of complex aortic aneurysms will further diminish. This article summarizes the current state of the art on patient selection, techniques, and results of hybrid procedures for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery 03/2012; 24(1):14-22.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, management, and outcomes of mesenteric artery complications (MACs) during angioplasty and stent placement (MAS) for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 156 patients treated with 173 MAS for CMI (1998-2010). MACs were defined as procedure-related mesenteric artery dissection, stent dislodgement, embolization, thrombosis, or perforation. End points were procedure-related morbidity and death.
There were 113 women and 43 men (mean age, 73 ± 14 years). Eleven patients (7%) developed 14 MACs, including distal mesenteric embolization in six, branch perforation in three, dissection in two, stent dislodgement in two, and stent thrombosis in one. Five patients required adjunctive endovascular procedures, including in two patients each, catheter-directed thrombolysis or aspiration, retrieval of dislodged stents, and placement of additional stents for dissection. Five patients (45%) required conversion to open repair: two required evacuation of mesenteric hematoma, two required mesenteric revascularization, and one required bowel resection. There were four early deaths (2.5%) due to mesenteric embolization or myocardial infarction in two patients each. Patients with MACs had higher rates of mortality (18% vs 1.5%) and morbidity (64% vs 19%; P <.05) and a longer hospital length of stay (6.3 ± 4.2 vs 1.6 ± 1.2 days) than those without MACs. Periprocedural use of antiplatelet therapy was associated with lower risk of distal embolization or vessel thrombosis (odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.90). Patients treated by a large-profile system had a trend toward more MACs (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-26.5; P = .07).
MACs occurred in 7% of patients who underwent MAS for CMI and resulted in higher mortality, morbidity, and longer hospital length of stay. Use of antiplatelet therapy reduced the risk of distal embolization or vessel thrombosis. There was a trend toward more MACs in patients who underwent interventions performed with a large-profile system.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 02/2012; 55(4):1063-71. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate our experience with treatment of giant arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) involving the renal and visceral vasculature and assess outcomes.
Clinical data from 12 consecutive patients (10 women; median age 58 years, range 37-79) undergoing intervention for 14 giant renal/visceral AVFs over a 15-year period (1994-2008) were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with extra-parenchymal, wide arteriovenous communications were included. Thirteen were located in the renal artery and one in the splenic artery. The etiology was most likely post-traumatic/iatrogenic in 6 patients, idiopathic in 4 (1 bilateral), congenital in 1 (bilateral), and one was associated with fibromuscular dysplasia. In 4 cases, the lesion was asymptomatic.
Two large renal AVFs were treated with open surgery: one elective AV fistula repair early in our experience and the other an emergent nephrectomy for rupture. Twelve AV fistulae were closed successfully using endovascular techniques performed solely through the feeding vessel without cannulating the draining vein. All symptomatic patients, except one with continued dyspnea from cardiac causes, had complete symptomatic relief. There was no mortality. Morbidity included 2 access site hematomas that were managed conservatively. Loss of renal parenchyma ranged from 5% to 30%, but median serum creatinine levels remained stable.
Endovascular treatment of giant renal/visceral AVFs is challenging but feasible and safe, with good organ preservation. Endovascular techniques have replaced open surgical repair as a first-line treatment for these challenging lesions.
Journal of Endovascular Therapy 12/2011; 18(6):811-8. · 2.86 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Small numbers of patients have advanced renal and mesenteric vascular disease requiring treatment. Open surgical treatment has been considered high risk, and the advent of endovascular intervention has affected management. This study evaluated the safety and long-term efficacy of concomitant mesenteric and renal revascularization with open techniques.
Data from 90 consecutive patients who underwent mesenteric and renal revascularization during a 30-year period were analyzed. Early and late outcomes were evaluated over two intervals: 48 in period A (1978 to 1995), concomitant open renal and mesenteric revascularization (COR; n = 46) and sequential open renal and mesenteric revascularization (SOR; n = 2); 42 in period B (1996 to 2009), 22 COR, 4 SOR, 13 sequential hybrid open/endovascular repairs (SOER), and 3 sequential endovascular repairs (SER).
There were 26 men and 64 women (median age, 67 years). Renal insufficiency was present in 24% and coronary artery disease (CAD) in 53%. Open surgical reconstruction was performed in 126 renal and 149 mesenteric arteries, with angioplasty/stenting in 15 and 8, respectively; 58 patients had concomitant aortic reconstruction (AR), and 9 had prior AR (8 in period A, 1 in period B). Hospital mortality was 8.8% overall; seven (14.5%) in period A and one (2.3%) in period B. Causes of early death were hemorrhage in three and multisystem organ failure in five. During a median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 6 days-26.5 years), 11 patients progressed to hemodialysis (7 COR, 4 SOER), and 6 had recurrent mesenteric ischemia (4 COR, 1 SOER, 1 SER). Eight patients in period A and seven in period B required further procedures (9 renal, 9 mesenteric; 11 COR, 2 SOER, 1 SOR, 1 SER). Univariate analysis of COR patients showed CAD (P = .017) and prior AR (P = .035), but not concomitant AR (P = .366), predicted early death. Five-year survival for COR patients was 65% overall, but 74% in patients who survived the operation, with no difference between time periods (P = .55).
Concomitant open mesenteric and renal revascularization is associated with low early mortality and good long-term durability in appropriately selected patients. It remains a viable procedure, especially in patients requiring concomitant aortic reconstruction. High-risk patients with CAD or prior aortic surgery should be considered for endovascular treatment, when anatomically feasible.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 11/2011; 55(2):406-12. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Mesenteric artery angioplasty and stenting (MAS) has been plagued by high restenosis and reintervention rates. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of patients treated for mesenteric artery in-stent restenosis (MAISR).
The clinical data of 157 patients treated for chronic mesenteric ischemia with MAS of 170 vessels was entered into a prospective database (1998-2010). Fifty-seven patients (36%) developed MAISR after a mean follow-up of 29 months, defined by duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity >330 cm/s and angiographic stenosis >60%. We reviewed the clinical data, radiologic studies, and outcomes of patients who underwent reintervention for restenosis. End points were mortality and morbidity, patient survival, symptom recurrence, reintervention, and patency rates.
There were 30 patients (25 female and five male; mean age, 69 ± 14 years) treated with reintervention for MAISR. Twenty-four patients presented with recurrent symptoms (21 chronic, three acute), and six had asymptomatic preocclusive lesions. Twenty-six patients (87%) underwent redo endovascular revascularization (rER) with stent placement in 17 (13 bare metal and four covered) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in nine. The other four patients (13%) had open bypass, one for acute ischemia. There was one death (3%) in a patient treated with redo stenting for acute mesenteric ischemia. Seven patients (27%) treated by rER developed complications, including access site problems in four patients, and distal embolization with bowel ischemia, congestive heart failure and stent thrombosis in one each. Symptom improvement was noted in 22 of the 24 symptomatic patients (92%). After a mean follow-up of 29 ± 12 months, 15 patients (50%) developed a second restenosis, and seven (23%) required other reintervention. Rates of symptom recurrence, restenosis, and reinterventions were 0/4, 0/4, and 0/4 for covered stents, 2/9, 3/9, and 2/9 for PTA, 5/13, 8/13, and 5/13 for bare metal stents, and 1/4, 4/4, and 0/4 for open bypass. For all patients, freedom from recurrent symptoms, restenosis, and reinterventions were 70% ± 10%, 60% ± 10% and 50% ±10% at 2 years. For patients treated by rER, secondary patency rates were 72 ± 12 at the same interval.
Nearly 40% of patients developed mesenteric artery in-stent restenosis, of which half required reintervention because of symptom recurrence or progression to an asymptomatic preocclusive lesion. Mesenteric reinterventions were associated with low mortality (3%), high complication rate (27%), and excellent symptom improvement (92%).
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 09/2011; 54(5):1422-1429.e1. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To describe a case of autoimmune inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) associated with rupture.
A 63-year-old woman presented with 5 days of abdominal pain, malaise, fever, and chills after 6 months of debilitating back pain with a 3-kg weight loss. On examination, she was shown to have a tender palpable pulsatile abdominal mass. Computed tomographic angiography revealed a multilobulated paravisceral AAA (5.5 cm in maximal diameter) and bilateral popliteal aneurysms. The appearance of the aneurysms was indicative of primary aortic infection. Laboratory examinations demonstrated a white blood cell (WBC) count of 12.3×10(9)/L, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 131 mm/hr, normal antinuclear antibody level, and C-reactive protein level of 211 mg/L. Nuclear WBC scan showed no uptake of tracer around the aorta. Blood and urine cultures were negative. Because of the AAA size and symptoms, open repair was expedited. The operation was performed through a transabdominal midline incision with a mediovisceral rotation. Extensive retroperitoneal inflammation extending into the paravisceral aorta was encountered. Supraceliac clamping was possible. The aorta was replaced from the level of the superior mesenteric artery to the aortic bifurcation with a 16-mm rifampin-soaked graft with reimplantation of the left renal artery. Cultures and biopsies were done.
Histology demonstrated vessel wall rupture, adventitial fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration, obliterative phlebitis, lymphoid follicles, perineural inflammation, and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) plasma cell infiltration, consistent with a contained ruptured aneurysm associated with IgG4 periaortitis. The patient had a long postoperative course with prolonged intubation and renal failure requiring hemodialysis, which resolved 8 weeks postoperatively. Immunosuppression was paramount for her improvement.
IgG4-related inflammatory AAAs are rare; this is the first report of one with a contained rupture. The patient's symptoms, the unusual appearance on computed tomography, the presence of popliteal aneurysms in a woman, and the normal WBC scan were indicative of an inflammatory etiology. Tissue biopsy was critical to obtain histological diagnosis and direct treatment.
Annals of Vascular Surgery 09/2011; 26(1):108.e1-4. · 1.03 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To review the outcomes of retrograde supra-aortic vessel stent (RSAS) placement combined with open carotid or subclavian artery revascularization.
Retrospective review of all consecutive patients between 1995 and 2010, excluding transfemoral procedures or isolated retrograde stent placement.
There were 11 patients (9 females, mean age 65 years). Open revascularization included carotid endarterectomy in 6 patients, carotid-subclavian bypass in 3, and carotid-carotid bypass in 2 patients. There were no operative deaths or neurological events. All symptomatic patients improved. Over a mean follow-up of 24 months, One patient developed common carotid artery (CCA) in-stent dissection and symptomatic restenosis treated with subclavian-carotid bypass. Another 3 patients had asymptomatic restenosis of the carotid bifurcation but required no intervention.
Retrograde stenting of the common carotid or innominate artery is a safe and effective method to provide inflow in selected patients with severe supra-aortic vessel disease who require concomitant open carotid or subclavian artery reconstructions.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 06/2011; 45(6):527-35. · 0.99 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the clinical characteristics, anatomy, and outcomes of patients treated with open mesenteric revascularization (OR) for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) before and after the preferential use of endovascular revascularization (ER).
We reviewed a prospective database of 257 patients treated for CMI with OR or ER from 1998 to 2009. Treatment trends were analyzed to identify changes in practice paradigm. Prior to 2002, OR was used in 58 of 81 patients (72%). Since 2002, ER surpassed OR as the most common treatment option; OR was indicated in 58 of 176 patients (33%) who either failed ER or had unfavorable lesions for stent placement. We analyzed differences in clinical data, anatomical characteristics, and outcomes in 116 patients treated with OR before (Pre-Endo, n = 58) and after 2002 (Post-Endo, n = 58). Anatomical characteristics were determined by a blinded investigator using conventional angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography with centerline of flow measurements.
Both groups had similar demographics, risk factors, and clinical presentation, with the exception of higher (P < .05) rates of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cardiac interventions, dysrhythmias, and higher comorbidity scores in the Post-Endo group. This group also had more extensive mesenteric artery disease, including higher incidence of three-vessel involvement (76% vs 57%; P = .048) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion (67% vs 41%;P = .005). There were no differences (P > .05) in the number of vessels revascularized (1.8 ± 0.4 vs 1.7 ± 0.5) and in graft configuration (antegrade, 91% vs 78%; retrograde, 9% vs 22%; two-vessel, 69% vs 81%) in the Pre- and Post-Endo groups, respectively. There were no differences in operative mortality (1.7% vs 3.4%), morbidity (43% vs 53%), length of stay (12 ± 1 vs 12 ± 1 days), and immediate symptom improvement (88% vs 86%) in the Pre- and Post-Endo groups, respectively. Mean follow-up was 57 ± 6 months for patients treated before 2002 and 29 ± 6 months for those treated after 2002 (P = .0001). At 5 years, primary and secondary patency rates and recurrence-free survival were 82%, 86%, and 84% in the Pre-Endo and 81%, 82%, and 76% in the Post-Endo groups (P > .05).
OR has been used in approximately one-third of patients treated for CMI since 2002. Despite more comorbidities and more extensive mesenteric artery disease in patients now treated with OR, outcomes have not changed compared with those operated prior to the preferential use of mesenteric stents before 2002.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 06/2011; 53(6):1611-8.e2. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is often diagnosed when idiopathic, episodic abdominal pain is associated with dynamic compression of the proximal celiac artery by fibers of the median arcuate ligament. The character of the abdominal pain is often postprandial and associated with gradual weight loss from poor food intake, suggestive of chronic mesenteric ischemia. However, the pathognomonic imaging feature of dynamic, ostial celiac artery compression with expiration does not consistently predict clinical improvement from revascularization. Proposed but unproven pathophysiological mechanisms include neurogenic pain from compression of the splanchnic nerve plexus and intermittent ischemia from compression of the celiac artery. Alterations in blood flow and ganglion compression are both associated with delayed gastric emptying, another physiological correlate of the clinical syndrome. Published reports describe a variable response to revascularization and nerve plexus resection suggest a need for translational research to better characterize this poorly understood clinical entity. We illustrate the current gaps in our knowledge of MALS with the case of a 51-year-old woman with a 4-year history of chronic abdominal pain who responded to a combination of ganglion resection and celiac artery reconstruction.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 05/2011; 45(5):433-7. · 0.99 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare outcomes of hybrid repair (HR) combining iliac artery stenting and open common femoral endarterectomy (CFE) with open aortoiliac and femoral reconstruction (OR) in patients with extensive iliac and common femoral occlusive disease (IFOD).
Between 1998 and 2008, 92 patients (164 limbs) underwent OR and 70 (84 limbs) underwent HR. All patients underwent concomitant CFE. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity, long-term patency, procedurally related limb salvage, and overall survival were analyzed after stratification by iliac TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus (TASC) classification into TASC A/B and TASC C/D.
HR patients were older for both TASC groups (A/B, P = .02; C/D, P = .01) and had higher Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) cardiac comorbidity scores (A/B, P = .01; C/D, P < .001) compared with OR. Technical success was ≥99% in both groups. An increase in the ankle-brachial index after the procedure was significantly higher in OR patients (0.49 ± 0.28) with TASC A/B lesions than HR (0.22 ± 0.18, P = .031). Hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay were 3.9 days for HR patients in TASC C/D vs 9.4 days for OR patients (P = .005). Comparing HR and OR, 30-day morbidity (3% vs 5%, P = .55) and mortality (1.1% vs 1.4%, P = .85) were equivalent. Primary patency of HR vs OR at 3 years was similar (91% vs 97%, P = .29) and was maintained after stratification by TASC A/B (89% vs 100%, P = .38) and TASC C/D (95% vs 97%, P = .54). Multivariate analysis for patency indicated that major tissue loss (Rutherford class 6) at presentation in the HR group was predictive of decreased long-term patency (P = .02). Limb salvage at 3 years was 100% in both groups. Overall survival was 74% for OR vs 40% for HR (P = .007).
IFOD can be treated using HR with similar early and long-term efficacy vs OR. HR patients with TASC C/D lesions experienced a shorter ICU and hospital stay than OR patients. HR should be considered for all patients with IFOD regardless the severity of TASC classification, particularly in those with high surgical risk. When deciding between HR and OR, one must consider that major tissue loss at presentation is a negative predictor of long-term patency in patients undergoing HR.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 04/2011; 54(2):402-11. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and open surgical repair (OR) for treatment of radiation-induced carotid stenosis (RICS).
We retrospectively reviewed 60 patients treated for 73 RICSs from a group of 5,824 patients who had carotid interventions between 1992 and 2009. Thirty-three patients (37 arteries) were treated with CAS and 27 patients (36 arteries) with OR. CAS was performed using embolic protection as part of a prospective institutional registry since 2003. End-points included mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), cranial nerve injury (CNI), wound complication, restenosis, and reintervention.
Demographics and cardiovascular risk factors were similar in both groups, with the exception of higher rates (P < .05) of hyperlipidemia (81% vs 56%) and coronary artery disease (63% vs 33%) in OR patients. There were more patients with tracheostomy (31% vs 4%) and time interval from irradiation to intervention was longer in the CAS group. There were no early deaths. At 30 days, OR was associated with one (3%) stroke, two (5.5%) MIs, six (17%) CNIs, and three (8%) wound complications. OR patients with prior radical neck dissections had more wound complications (14% vs 5%) and CNIs (28% vs 9%) compared with those without neck dissections. In the CAS group, there were two (6%) strokes and no MIs, CNIs, or wound complications. Mean length of hospital stay was longer after OR than CAS (4.1 ± 3.7 days vs 2.4 ± 2.1 days; P = .02). Median follow-up was 58 months. At 7 years, OR was associated with higher patient survival (75% ± 15% vs 29% ± 13%, P = .008) and freedom from neurological events (100% vs 57% ± 9.5%, P = .058), but similar freedom from restenosis (80% ± 10% vs 72% ± 9%) and reinterventions (87% ± 10% vs 86% ± 9%) compared with CAS.
Carotid artery stenting for radiation-induced stenosis has the advantages of no CNI or wound complications with similar early stroke rate compared with open carotid repair. However, the lower freedom from neurological events may offset the early benefits of carotid stenting in patients who are considered good candidates for open surgery.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 03/2011; 53(3):629-36.e1-5. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To identify factors affecting long-term outcome after open surgical reconstructions (OSR) and hybrid reconstructions (HR) for chronic venous obstructions.
Retrospective review of clinical data of 60 patients with 64 OSR or HR for chronic obstruction of iliofemoral (IF) veins or inferior vena cava (IVC) between January 1985 and September 2009. Primary end points were patency and clinical outcome.
Sixty patients (26 men, mean age 43 years, range 16-81) underwent 64 procedures. Ninety-four percent had leg swelling, 90% had venous claudication, and 31% had active or healed ulcers (CEAP classes: C3 = 30, C4 = 12, C5 = 8, C6 = 12). Fifty-two OSRs included 29 femorofemoral (Palma vein: 25, polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]: 4), 17 femoroiliac-inferior vena cava (IVC) (vein: 3, PTFE: 14) and six complex bypasses. Twelve patients had HR, which included endophlebectomy, patch angioplasty, and stenting. Early graft occlusion occurred after 17% of OSR and 33% HR. Discharge patency was 96% after OSR, 92% after HR. No mortality or pulmonary embolism occurred. Five-year primary and secondary patency was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29%-55%) and 59% (CI 43%-72%), respectively. For Palma vein grafts it was 70% and 78%, for femoroiliac and ilio-infrahepatic IVC bypasses it was 63% and 86%, and for femoro-infrahepatic IVC bypasses it was 31% and 57%, respectively. Complex OSRs and hybrid procedures had 28% and 30% 2-year secondary patency, respectively. The only factor that significantly affected graft patency in multivariate analysis was May-Thurner syndrome with associated chronic venous thrombosis. For HR, stenting into the common femoral vein patch vs iliac stents only significantly increased patency. At last follow-up, 60% of the patients had no venous claudication and no or minimal swelling. All ulcers with patent grafts healed but 50% of these recurred.
Both OSR and HR are viable options if endovascular procedures fail or are not feasible. Palma vein bypass and femoroiliac or iliocaval PTFE bypasses have excellent outcomes with good symptomatic relief.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 02/2011; 53(2):383-93. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We previously reported that in situ rifampin-soaked grafts (ISRGs) were safe in select patients with aortic graft infections, with the best results in those with aortic graft enteric erosion or fistula (AGEF). This study evaluates the late results of ISRG for AGEF.
From 1990 to 2008, 183 patients were treated for aortic graft infections (121 primary and 62 AGEF). We reviewed 54 patients treated for AGEF with a standard protocol, which included excision of the infected part of the graft, intestinal repair, ISRG with omental wrap, and long-term antibiotics. We excluded 8 patients with AGEF (13%) treated with axillofemoral grafts (AXFG, n = 5) or in situ femoral vein (n = 3) due to excessive perigraft purulence. Endpoints were early morbidity and mortality, late survival, reinfection, and graft-related complications.
There were 45 male patients and 9 female patients with a mean age of 69 ± 9 years. Presentation was gastrointestinal bleeding in 33 patients, fever in 25 patients, and hemorrhagic shock in 10 patients. Other features were perigraft fluid in 29 patients and purulence in 9 patients. Forty-two patients (80%) had infections isolated to a portion of the graft body or limb, with the remainder of the graft well incorporated. Total graft excision was performed in 31 patients and partial excision in 23 patients. Total operating time was 6.2 ± 1.9 hours. Postoperative complications occurred in 28 patients (52%), and there were 5 deaths (9%). Operative mortality was 2.3% in stable patients (1 of 44) and 40% in those with hemorrhagic shock (4 of 10; P < .001). The hospital stay was 20 ± 18 days. Mean follow-up was 51 months (range, 3-197 months). Five-year patient survival, primary graft patency, and limb salvage rates were 59 ± 8%, 92 ± 5%, and 100%, respectively. There were no late graft-related deaths. There were two (4%) graft reinfections, one that was treated with axillofemoral bypass, and the other with perigraft fluid aspiration and oral antibiotic suppression.
ISRGs with omental wrap and long-term antibiotics are associated with low reinfection rates in patients with AGEF who do not have excessive perigraft purulence. Graft patency and limb salvage rates are excellent.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 01/2011; 53(1):99-106, 107.e1-7; discussion 106-7. · 3.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To describe the outcomes of single- and two-vessel mesenteric artery stents in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).
We reviewed 101 patients (41 men and 60 women; mean age, 73 ± 13 years) treated with mesenteric artery stents for atherosclerotic CMI between 1998 and 2008. Clinical data and outcomes were reviewed in patients treated with single superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stent (group A) or two-vessel celiac artery (CA) and SMA stent (group B). Isolated CA stenting was analyzed as a separate group (group C). End-points were taken as differences in morbidity and mortality and freedom from recurrent symptoms and reinterventions.
There were 61 patients in group A, 24 in group B, and 16 in group C. All three groups had similar demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and clinical presentation. There were no differences in early mortality (2%, 4%, and 0%), morbidity (18%, 26%, and 12%), and symptom relief (95%, 78%, and 100%) between groups A, B, and C, respectively (p value was not significant). Mean follow-up was 41 ± 17 months. Freedom for reintervention at 1 and 3 years was similar among patients in groups A (86 ± 5% and 50 ± 9%), B (67 ± 11% and 67 ± 11%), and C (63 ± 13% and 63 ± 13%), respectively (p value was not significant). There were no significant differences in freedom from restenosis at 1 and 3 years among patients in groups A (54 ± 7% and 44 ± 9%), B (47 ± 12% and 39 ± 12%), and C (43 ± 13% and 34 ± 13%), respectively. Primary and secondary patency rates at 3 years were 57% and 96% for SMA and 61% and 87% for CA stents, respectively (p value was not significant). CA stent alone was associated with symptom recurrence in 6 of 16 patients (38%), as compared with the recurrence rate of 18% (11 of 61) in patients who underwent SMA stent placement (p = 0.06).
Two-vessel CA and SMA stenting do not reduce the incidence of recurrent symptoms or reinterventions when compared with single-vessel SMA stents in patients with CMI. CA stent alone carries a high risk of recurrence.
Annals of Vascular Surgery 11/2010; 24(8):1094-101. · 1.03 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Endoleaks are critical complications of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study sought to determine the frequency and nature of intraoperative endoleaks and their impact on postoperative endoleak-related events.
A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent EVAR at our institution. The impact of intraoperative endoleaks on postoperative endoleak rates and endoleak-related reintervention rates were assessed.
From December 18, 1996, to May 21, 2003, 241 patients underwent EVAR. An endoleak was observed during 126 (52.3%) procedures. Type I endoleaks were observed in 63 (26.1%) cases: 35 proximal and 31 distal endoleaks (3 cases at both attachments). Angioplasty, additional cuff placement, or stenting corrected 59 (89.4%) of these endoleaks. A total of 71 type II intraoperative endoleaks (29.5%) and 8 type IV endoleaks (3.3%) were observed without any attempted corrective maneuvers. Ten type III endoleaks (4.2%) occurred but all resolved with angioplasty or additional cuff placement. In all, 86 (35.7%) endoleaks persisted on completion angiogram. Patients with a type I or type II intraoperative endoleak were more likely to have an endoleak at 1.5 years (31.4% vs. 21.6%, P=.018). Reinterventions were required more often after an intraoperative type I endoleak (10% vs. 4%, P=.003). Patients with intraoperative endoleaks demonstrated a trend toward less postoperative aneurysm diameter reduction at 2 years (43.8% vs. 74.5%, P=.104).
The presence of a type I or a type II endoleak during EVAR significantly increases the likelihood of a postoperative endoleak and should prompt a high degree of suspicion during follow-up.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 05/2009; 43(4):352-9. · 0.99 Impact Factor
