-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) task force considered aspects of the design and conduct of early (phase I and II) studies of combinations of molecular targeted agents during their 2012 meeting. The task force defined necessary non-clinical data, such as evidence of additive or synergistic effects in multiple molecularly credentialed and validated models, and appropriate pharmacodynamic marker development. A robust hypothesis was considered critical while non-clinical pharmacokinetic studies were also considered valuable. Clinical trials should include clear objectives that will prove or disprove the hypothesis. Predictive biomarkers/classifiers should be explored in phase I studies, rather than used to select patients. Trial design should be efficient and flexible rather than based on a strict progression from phase I to II to III; researchers could consider phase I studies with an expansion cohort, Phase I/II designs or phase II studies with a safety run in. Pharmacokinetics are recommended when interactions or overlapping toxicity is expected. Pharmacodynamic evaluations should be considered especially in a subset of patients closest to the recommended dose; an attempt should be made to validate surrogate tissues to enable inclusion for all patients. Schedule and or dose should be formally explored for e.g. with a randomised or an adaptive design. Data and knowledge sharing was strongly recommended, including the creation of formal or informal consortia of laboratories with individual expertise in pathway or target based models, collaboration between companies to ensure that agents which are 'best in class' are combined, and the development of databases which will be able to inform the development of future recommendations/guidelines.
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 02/2013; · 4.12 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract Sorafenib is active in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The NCIC Clinical Trials Group initiated a phase I/II study of the combination of sorafenib with cytarabine in older patients with AML or high risk MDS, who were unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. FLT3 mutational status was determined in all patients. Twenty-one patients were enrolled (4 MDS, 17 AML) with a median age of 77 years. The Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) was cytarabine 10mg bid days 1-10 and sorafenib 600mg/day days 2-28. Dose limiting toxicities were fatigue, sepsis and skin rash. Of 15 evaluable patients treated at the RP2D, two patients responded. The overall response rate for eligible patients was 10%. FLT3 mutations were found in only 3 patients. We conclude that this combination of sorafenib and cytarabine has limited activity in this unselected cohort of elderly AML/MDS patients in which FLT3 mutations seemed underrepresented.
Leukemia & lymphoma 10/2012; · 2.40 Impact Factor
-
Teresa M Petrella,
Richard Tozer,
Karl Belanger,
Kerry J Savage,
Ralph Wong,
Michael Smylie,
Suzanne Kamel-Reid,
Victor Tron,
Bingshu E Chen,
Naomi N Hunder,
Linda Hagerman,
Wendy Walsh, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE We report a multicenter phase II study of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM), evaluating the efficacy, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), immunogenicity, and biomarker profile of interleukin-21 (IL-21). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with no prior systemic therapy and with limited-disease MM were treated with IL-21 by using three different dosing regimens. Cohort 1 received 50 μg/kg per day by outpatient intravenous bolus injection for 5 days of each week during weeks 1, 3, and 5 of an 8-week cycle. Cohort 2 received 30 μg/kg per day on the same schedule, and cohort 3 received 50 μg/kg per day for 5 days of each week during weeks 1 and 3 of a 6-week cycle. Results Forty patients were enrolled: three in cohort 1, 30 in cohort 2, and seven in cohort 3. Two patients in cohort 1 and four in cohort 3 had dose-limiting toxicities; all other patients were treated with a dose of 30 μg/kg per day. Common adverse events were fatigue, rash, diarrhea, nausea, and myalgia. Overall response rate (ORR) was 22.5%, with nine confirmed partial responses (median response duration, 5.3 months); 16 had stable disease (median response duration, 5.3 months). ORR did not appear to depended on IL-21 receptor expression or BRAF mutation status. The median PFS was 4.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.09 to 17.81 months). CONCLUSION The ORR to IL-21 is 22.5% for first-line MM and warrants further investigation. The favorable PFS and OS suggest that this is an active agent in comparison to both historical NCIC Clinical Trials Group data and data from meta-analysis of Cooperative Group phase II trials.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 08/2012; 30(27):3396-401. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Clinical Oncology 02/2012; 30(10):1030-3. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: There has been a significant shift within oncology drug development away from empiric screening of cytotoxic compounds to the era of genomics and molecularly targeted agents. The drug development process is evolving with greater emphasis on proof-of-mechanism studies in both preclinical and early clinical development. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) Task Force, established as a forum for academic and pharmaceutical leaders to discuss methodological issues in targeted anticancer therapy development, met in March 2010 to review what were the minimal data required to make appropriate decisions about moving new targeted cancer agents from late preclinical development into phase I and from phase I into phase II trials. A number of specific questions were posed, and responses to each developed through survey, literature review and discussion at the face to face meeting of the MDICT Task Force. Consensus emerged around the necessity to demonstrate proof-of-mechanism and obtain information on key pharmacokinetic aspects of drug behaviour in late preclinical and early clinical trials. However, controversy remains on the extent of in vivo anti-tumour efficacy required to support clinical development of targeted agents. A systematic review of the data in this area would be informative. Further, while objective response in phase I trials may be a favourable signal about the potential activity of a new agent, debate exists around the weight that should be placed on the observation of stable disease or functional imaging changes in driving drug development decisions in the absence of observing either responses or convincing pharmacodynamic data in phase I. MDICT made a number of recommendations that may aid in future development of targeted agents.
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 11/2011; 48(2):170-8. · 4.12 Impact Factor
-
Amit M Oza,
Laurie Elit,
Ming-Sound Tsao,
Suzanne Kamel-Reid,
Jim Biagi,
Diane Michele Provencher,
Walter H Gotlieb,
Paul J Hoskins,
Prafull Ghatage,
Katia S Tonkin,
Helen J Mackay,
John Mazurka,
Joana Sederias,
Percy Ivy,
Janet E Dancey, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a tumor suppressor gene, and loss of function mutations are common and appear to be important in the pathogenesis of endometrial carcinomas. Loss of PTEN causes deregulated phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/serine-threonine kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) signaling which may provide neoplastic cells with a selective survival advantage by enhancing angiogenesis, protein translation, and cell cycle progression. Temsirolimus, an ester derivative of rapamycin that inhibits mTOR, was evaluated in this setting.
Sequential phase II studies evaluated single-agent activity of temsirolimus in women with recurrent or metastatic chemotherapy-naive or chemotherapy-treated endometrial cancer. Temsirolimus 25 mg intravenously was administered weekly in 4-week cycles.
In the chemotherapy-naive group, 33 patients received a median of four cycles (range, one to 23 cycles). Of the 29 patients evaluable for response, four (14%) had an independently confirmed partial response and 20 (69%) had stable disease as best response, with a median duration of 5.1 months (range, 3.7 to 18.4 months) and 9.7 months (range, 2.1 to 14.6 months). Only five patients (18%) had progressive disease. In the chemotherapy-treated group, 27 patients received a median of three cycles (range, one to six cycles). Of the 25 patients evaluable for response, one (4%) had an independently confirmed partial response, and 12 patients (48%) had stable disease, with a median duration of 4.3 months (range, 3.6 to 4.9 months) and 3.7 months (range, 2.4 to 23.2 months). PTEN loss (immunohistochemistry and mutational analysis) and molecular markers of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway did not correlate with the clinical outcome.
mTOR inhibition with temsirolimus has encouraging single-agent activity in endometrial cancer which is higher in chemotherapy-naive patients than in chemotherapy-treated patients and is independent of PTEN status. The difference in activity according to prior therapy should be factored into future clinical trial designs.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 08/2011; 29(24):3278-85. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Rena Buckstein,
John Kuruvilla,
Neil Chua,
Christina Lee,
David A Macdonald,
Abdulwahab J Al-Tourah,
Alison H Foo,
Wendy Walsh,
S Percy Ivy,
Michael Crump, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: There are limited effective therapies for most patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We conducted a phase II trial of the multi-targeted vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) kinase inhibitor, sunitinib, 37.5 mg given orally once daily in adult patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Of 19 enrolled patients, 17 eligible patients were evaluable for toxicity and 15 for response. No objective responses were seen and nine patients achieved stable disease (median duration 3.4 months). As a result, the study was closed at the end of the first stage. Grades 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 29% and 35%, respectively. There was no relationship between change in circulating endothelial cell numbers (CECs) and bidimensional tumor burden over time. Despite some activity in solid tumors, sunitinib showed no evidence of response in relapsed/refractory DLBCL and had greater than expected hematologic toxicity.
Leukemia & lymphoma 04/2011; 52(5):833-41. · 2.40 Impact Factor
-
Kim N Chi,
Sebastien J Hotte,
Evan Y Yu,
Dongsheng Tu,
Bernhard J Eigl,
Ian Tannock,
Fred Saad,
Scott North,
Jean Powers,
Martin E Gleave, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine the clinical activity of OGX-011, an antisense inhibitor of clusterin, in combination with docetaxel/prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive docetaxel/prednisone either with (arm A) or without (arm B) OGX-011 640 mg intravenously weekly. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥ 50% from baseline, with the experimental therapy being considered of interest if the proportion of patients with a PSA decline was more than 60%. Secondary end points were objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and changes in serum clusterin.
Eighty-two patients were accrued, 41 to each arm. OGX-011 adverse effects included rigors and fevers. After cycle 1, median serum clusterin decreased by 26% in arm A and increased by 0.9% in arm B (P < .001). PSA declined by ≥ 50% in 58% of patients in arm A and 54% in arm B. Partial response occurred in 19% and 25% of patients in arms A and B, respectively. Median PFS and OS times were 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 8.8 months) and 23.8 months (95% CI, 16.2 months to not reached), respectively, in arm A and 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.6 months) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 25.8 months), respectively, in arm B. Baseline factors associated with improved OS on exploratory multivariate analysis were an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.51), presence of bone or lymph node metastases only (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.79), and treatment assignment to OGX-011 (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.87).
Treatment with OGX-011 and docetaxel was well tolerated with evidence of biologic effect and was associated with improved survival. Further evaluation is warranted.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 09/2010; 28(27):4247-54. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The impact of PTEN status and microsatellite instability (MSI) on the prognosis of women with endometrial cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate MSI and PTEN expression in two patient populations using data from NCIC CTG studies.
Archival paraffin embedded tumour from women with endometrial cancer enrolled in NCIC CTG studies: EN5 (stage I/II) and IND 126, 148 and 160 (advanced/recurrent disease) were examined for MSI using BAT25/26 and for PTEN expression using immunohistochemistry. PTEN and MSI status were correlated with clinicopathologic variables and survival using data from NCIC CTG trial databases.
PTEN and MSI results were available from 128 and 163 patients, respectively. MSI+ tumours were more common in women enrolled in EN5 compared to the IND studies (p=0.01). PTEN negative tumours were associated with improved survival in both univariate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.94; p=0.03) and multivariate (adjusted HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.96; p=0.03) analyses in women enrolled in IND studies. Microsatellite stable tumours were associated with an improved prognosis in univariate (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06-0.51; p<0.0001) and multivariate (adjusted HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.5; p<0.0001) analyses in women enrolled in EN5. There was no significant correlation between MSI and PTEN status.
PTEN negative tumours in women with advanced disease are associated with improved survival. MSI+ tumours are more common in early stage disease and in this group of women are associated with a worse prognosis.
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 03/2010; 46(8):1365-73. · 4.12 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Vascular endothethial growth factor (VEGF) and stem cell factor (c-KIT) signaling may play a role in the development and progression of cervical carcinoma. Sunitinib malate is an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits receptors for VEGF, c-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor. This multi-centre phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity of sunitinib in women with locally advanced or metastatic cervical carcinoma who had received up to one prior line of chemotherapy for advanced disease.
Sunitinib, 50 mg/day, was administered in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off treatment). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.
Sixteen (84%) of 19 patients enrolled had stable disease (median duration 4.4 months, 2.3-17 months), but no objective response was observed. Median time to progression was 3.5 months (range, 2.7-7.0 months). Four patients had fistulae develop on study treatment and an additional patient developed a fistula 3.5 months after discontinuation of therapy. All five patients had received either prior chemoradiation or radiation.
A higher rate of fistula formation (26.3%) was observed than would be expected and is of concern. Sunitinib has insufficient activity as a single agent in cervical cancer to warrant further investigation.
Gynecologic Oncology 10/2009; 116(2):163-7. · 3.89 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Clinical Oncology 10/2009; 27(33):e213-4. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Clinical benefit (CB) was first successfully used as an end-point in 1997 in the pivotal study of gemcitabine in advanced pancreas cancer. In the trial by Burris et al. CB was a composite measure of pain, performance status and weight. Here we describe how CB has been used in oncology trials since that time.
We performed an electronic search (www.jco.org) for reports of all clinical trials (phase I, II and III) published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology 1997-2008 citing 'clinical benefit'. Eligible trials were those reporting clinical benefit as an end-point. Details related to study methodology, sponsorship and end-points were abstracted. Use of CB was classified as patient centred if it referred to improvement in the clinical parameters used by Burris et al. or in other disease-related symptoms. CB was classified as tumour centred if it related to objective tumour criteria for partial/complete response and/or stable disease. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise findings and the chi-square test was used to compare proportions.
Seventy-one trials reporting CB as an end-point were identified: 37 in breast, 8 in pancreas and 26 in other cancers. The definition of CB was patient centred in 20 trials (28%) and tumour centred in 51 trials (72%). Only 20% (14/71) of trials (including all 8 pancreas studies) used the original Burris definition. Among the 71 trials reporting clinical benefit, in only 31 (44%) cases was the end-point defined as a primary or secondary study objective. Trials with a patient-centred definition of CB were considerably more likely to do so than trials with a tumour-centred definition (19/20, 95% versus 12/51, 24%, p<0.0001). Study variables associated with the use of a tumour-centred definition include: disease site (breast 35/37, 95%; all others 16/34, 47%, p<0.001) and intervention (hormone or targeted agent 38/40, 95%; chemotherapy 13/31, 42%, p<0.001). There has been a steady increase in the number of trials using CB as an end-point; in the second half of the study period the number of trials increased from 17 to 54, along with the proportion of trials with a tumour-centred definition (10/17, 59% to 41/54, 76%, p=0.09).
Despite its initial definition, clinical benefit is often used to describe objective tumour findings. Clinical trials should use end-points in a consistent manner to enable clear communication between investigators, clinicians and patients about the benefit of novel therapies.
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 06/2009; 45(13):2249-52. · 4.12 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Clusterin is an antiapoptotic protein activated in response to cellular stress. OGX-011 is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits clusterin expression. The primary objective of this phase II trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of OGX-011 and docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer.
Women with measurable metastatic breast cancer and <or=1 chemotherapy regimen were eligible. Three loading doses of OGX-011 640 mg i.v. followed by weekly OGX-011 and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (every 3 weeks) were given. A two-stage design was used with a hypothesis of H(0) <or=35% and H(a) >or=55%. Objective response in >or=6 of the first 14 patients was required for the trial to continue to the second stage.
Fifteen patients were enrolled. A median of six cycles were delivered (range, 2-10). Five partial responses were confirmed for a 33% response rate (95% confidence interval, 11.8-61.6%) with a further 9 (60%) patients showing stable disease. The median duration of stable disease was 9.3 months. The median time to progression was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.62-9.43 months). Toxic effects were similar to those with single agent docetaxel. Although serum clusterin decreased on treatment, there was no relationship observed between the magnitude of decrease and response.
The combination of OGX-011 and docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) is well tolerated and clinical activity was seen in these patients with metastatic breast cancer, but there was an insufficient number of responses to meet the criteria for proceeding to the second stage of accrual.
Clinical Cancer Research 01/2009; 15(2):708-13. · 7.74 Impact Factor
-
Amit M Oza, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer,
Laurie Elit,
Jean-Claude Cutz,
Akira Sakurada,
Ming S Tsao,
Paul J Hoskins,
Jim Biagi,
Prafull Ghatage,
John Mazurka,
Diane Provencher,
Naomi Dore,
Janet Dancey,
Anthony Fyles
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression is common in endometrial cancers and may have a major role in tumor growth and progression. Erlotinib is an orally active, selective inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine kinase activity.
A multinomial design two-stage phase II study was performed to evaluate single-agent activity of erlotinib in women with advanced endometrial cancer with recurrent or metastatic disease who were chemotherapy naïve and had received up to one line of prior hormonal therapy. Erlotinib was administered at daily dose of 150 mg. Archival tumor tissue was analyzed for EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Mutational status of EGFR was determined in responders.
Thirty-two of 34 entered patients are assessable for response. Treatment was well tolerated and severe toxicity infrequent, with the only grade 4 toxicity being an elevation of transaminases (AST). There were four confirmed partial responses (PRs; 12.5%; 95% CI, 3.5% to 29%) lasting 2 to 36 months. Fifteen patients had stable disease (SD), with median duration of 3.7 months (range, 2 to 12 months). EGFR expression was analyzed in thirty patients; 19 were positive, nine were negative, and two were not assessable. Of the 19 patients who were EGFR positive, three had PR (16%), seven SD, and eight progressive disease, and one was not assessable. No mutations were identified in responders. FISH showed no correlation of response with gene amplification.
Erlotinib is well tolerated with an overall objective response rate of 12.5%. Molecular analysis did not identify EGFR mutations in responders or correlation of response with gene amplification.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 07/2008; 26(26):4319-25. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Christopher W Lee,
Karl Bélanger,
Sanjay C Rao,
Teresa M Petrella,
Richard G Tozer,
Lori Wood,
Kerry J Savage, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer,
Timothy W Synold,
Nancy Wainman,
Lesley Seymour
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To assess the response rate and toxicity of the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor, ispinesib, in malignant melanoma. Seventeen patients were enrolled from April to November 2005. Ispinesib was administered as a 1-hour infusion at a dose of 18 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks until disease progression. No objective responses were seen. Six patients (35%) had a best response of stable disease for a median duration of 2.8 months. Disease progression was documented in 9 (53%) after 1 or 2 cycles. Eighty-eight percent of patients received > or =90% of planned dose intensity. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included dizziness (1) and blurred vision (1). There was one episode of febrile neutropenia, but no grade 3 or 4 biochemical adverse events. Pharmacokinetics was consistent with prior studies. KSP immunoreactivity was seen in 14 of 16 available archival tissue samples (88%). Ispinesib can be safely administered using the dose and schedule employed, with mild hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity. No objective responses were observed, and further development of single-agent ispinesib in malignant melanoma is not recommended. Although KSP expression appears to be common in melanoma, KSP may not be a suitable target for its treatment.
Investigational New Drugs 06/2008; 26(3):249-55. · 3.36 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Because the appropriate design and end points for phase II evaluation of targeted anticancer agents are unclear, we undertook a review of recent reports of phase II trials of targeted agents to determine the types of designs used, the planned end points, the outcomes, and the relationship between trial outcomes and regulatory approval.
We retrieved reports of single-agent phase II trials in six solid tumors for 19 targeted drugs. For each, we abstracted data regarding planned design and actual results. Response rates were examined for any relationship to eventual success of the agents, as determined by US Food and Drug Administration approval for at least one indication.
Eighty-nine trials were identified. Objective response was the primary or coprimary end point in the majority of trials (61 of 89 trials). Fourteen reports were of randomized studies generally evaluating different doses of agents, not as controlled experiments. Enrichment for target expression was uncommon. Objective responses were seen in 38 trials; in 19 trials, response rates were more than 10%, and in eight, they were more than 20%. Agents with high response rates tended to have high nonprogression rates; renal cell carcinoma was the exception to this. Higher overall response rates were predictive of regulatory approval in the tumor types reviewed (P = .005).
In practice, phase II design for targeted agents is similar to that for cytotoxics. Objective response seems to be a useful end point for screening new targeted agents because, in our review, its observation predicted for eventual success. Improvements in design are recommended, as is more frequent inclusion of biological questions as part of phase II trials.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 04/2008; 26(8):1346-54. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) task force considered aspects of the design and conduct of phase II studies for molecular targeted agents during their 2007 meeting. The task force recommended that multinomial endpoints and designs should be considered for phase II studies of targeted agents, that both single arm as well as randomised designs remain appropriate in certain settings, and that further assessment of novel endpoints (tumour growth kinetic assessment, biomarker or functional imaging) and designs (randomised discontinuation or Bayesian adaptive design) be encouraged. The MDICT cautioned on the use of small randomised trials which have a number of statistical pitfalls and dangers and strongly encouraged the complete reporting, including negative trials, in the scientific literature.
European Journal of Cancer 02/2008; 44(1):25-9. · 5.54 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Oncology drug development has seen a paradigm shift in the past decade from traditional cytotoxic agents to molecular targeted therapies. Given the different mechanisms and toxicities of these agents, drug development methodology may also require novel approaches. To address emerging issues in oncology drug development the 'Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies' (MDICT) task force was established to provide a forum for academic leaders involved in cancer drug development to discuss methodological issues inherent to the study of targeted anticancer therapy. At the inaugural MDICT meeting in 2006, discussion focused on the most appropriate primary endpoints for first-in-man phase I studies of targeted anticancer agents and organisational issues of such studies. This report summarises the scientific reviews and discussions as well as the recommendations regarding phase I trial design formulated by the MDICT task force.
European Journal of Cancer 02/2008; 44(1):19-24. · 5.54 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Triapine is a novel small molecule ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor that showed activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines. Evaluating new agents with novel mechanisms remains of interest for patients with incurable RCC. This was a single-arm, multicentre phase II trial where Triapine was given at a schedule of 96 mg/m2 2-h infusion daily x 4 repeated every 2 weeks in patients with recurrent RCC. A median of four cycles of Triapine was administered to 19 eligible patients. One response was seen (7%.) Median time to progression was 3.6 months. Common adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2, with fatigue in 74%, nausea in 68% and vomiting in 58%. However grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 79% and acute reactions of hypoxia, hypotension, methemoglobinemia were seen. Dose reductions/delays due to AEs were common with only 47% of patients receiving > 90% of planned dose intensity. The study closed, at the end of stage 1 as it did not meet the minimal efficacy criteria to proceed. Further evaluation of Triapine at this dose and schedule in patients with advanced kidney cancer is not recommended.
Investigational New Drugs 10/2007; 25(5):471-7. · 3.36 Impact Factor
-
Lillian L Siu,
Denis Soulieres,
Eric X Chen,
Gregory R Pond,
Soo F Chin,
Peggy Francis,
Luc Harvey,
Meri Klein,
Wenjiang Zhang,
Janet Dancey, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer,
Eric Winquist
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine the phase II dose and objective response rate of erlotinib, a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC).
HNSCC patients with no prior chemotherapy and measurable disease were treated in three escalating-dose cohorts of daily continuous oral (PO) erlotinib and intermittent intravenous (IV) cisplatin given every 21 days. The recommended phase II dose (RPTD) was then evaluated in a two-stage trial with a primary end point of objective response rate.
A total of 51 patients were enrolled. The RPTD was identified as erlotinib 100 mg PO daily and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV every 21 days. Forty-five patients were treated at the RPTD, of which 44 and 43 were eligible for toxicity and efficacy evaluations, respectively. The intention-to-treat response rate was 21%, with one complete and eight partial responses (95% CI, 10% to 36%), and disease stabilization was achieved in 21 patients (49%; 95% CI, 33% to 65%). Median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 4.8 months) and median overall survival was 7.9 (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.5) months. The combination was well tolerated, with minimal grade 3 or higher toxicity. Subgroup analysis suggested that patients who developed higher grade skin rashes during cycle 1 had better survival outcomes (P = .034).
This schedule of erlotinib and cisplatin has a favorable toxicity profile and has antitumor activity in HNSCC comparable to standard combination chemotherapy regimens.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 07/2007; 25(16):2178-83. · 18.37 Impact Factor
