-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Masticatory efficiency may be impaired in individuals with dentofacial deformities. The objective of the present study was to determine the condition of masticatory efficiency in individuals with dentofacial deformities. 30 patients with class II (DG-II) and 35 patients with class III (DG-III) dentofacial deformity participated in the study, all had an indication for orthognathic surgery. 30 volunteers (CG) with no alterations of facial morphology or dental occlusion and with no signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction also participated. Masticatory efficiency was analysed using a bead system (colorimetric method). Each individual chewed 4 beads, one at a time, over 20s measured with a chronometer. The groups were compared in terms of masticatory efficiency using analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the level of significance set at P<0.05. Masticatory efficiency was significantly greater in CG (P<0.05) than in DG-II and DG-III in all chewing tasks tested, with no significant difference between DG-II and DG-III (P>0.05). It was observed that the presence of class II and class III dentofacial deformity affected masticatory efficiency compared to CG, although there was no difference between DG-II and DG-III.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 04/2012; 41(7):830-4. · 1.51 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine whether dentofacial deformities influence maximal isometric bite force in affected individuals compared to a control group.
A total of 125 volunteer adult patients attended at a hospital participated in the study. Of these, 44 had a confirmed diagnosis of class II deformity (GII: 13 men and 31 women; mean age: 27 years) and 81 had class III deformity (GIII: 35 men and 46 women; mean age 25 years), all of them with indication of orthognathic surgery and under orthodontic treatment. Fifty adult volunteers (CG: 17 men and 33 women; mean age: 22 years) with no alterations of dental occlusion or clinical signs of temporomandibular joint dysfunction participated as controls. Maximal isometric bite force was measured with an electronic gnathodynamometer alternately positioned on each side of the dental arch in the region of the molar teeth and the subjects were instructed to bite it as strongly as possible, with the value being recorded in Newtons. Individuals with good understanding of oral language and with no cognitive or neuromuscular deficits were selected. Data were analysed statistically by the mixed effects model.
There was no statistically significant difference (P>.05) in maximal isometric bite force between subjects with class II and class III dentofacial deformities, although the values for both groups were lower than those of control individuals.
Dentofacial deformity affected maximal isometric bite force regardless of its pattern.
Archives of oral biology 03/2011; 56(10):972-6. · 1.65 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Individuals with dentofacial deformities have masticatory muscle changes. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of interdisciplinary treatment in patients with dentofacial deformities regarding electromyographic activity (EMG) of masticatory muscles three years after surgical correction. Thirteen patients with class III dentofacial deformities were studied, considered as group P1 (before surgery) and group P3 (3 years to 3 years and 8 months after surgery). Fifteen individuals with no changes in facial morphology or dental occlusion were studied as controls. The participants underwent EMG examination of the temporal and masseter muscles during mastication and biting. Evaluation of the amplitude interval of EMG activity revealed a difference between P1 and P3 and no difference between P3 and the control group. In contrast, evaluation of root mean square revealed that, in general, P3 values were higher only when compared with P1 and differed from the control group. There was an improvement in the EMG activity of the masticatory muscles, mainly observed in the masseter muscle, with values close to those of the control group in one of the analyses.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 05/2009; 39(9):853-6. · 1.51 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Individuals with dentofacial deformities present changes in masticatory muscles. The objective of the present study was to determine the influence of interdisciplinary treatment in cases of class III dentofacial deformities regarding the EMG activity of the temporal (T) and masseter (M) muscles. The study was conducted on 15 patients with class III dentofacial deformities who were submitted to orthodontic, oromyofunctional and surgical treatment and assigned to groups P1 (before surgery) and P2 (6-9 months after surgery). Fifteen individuals with no alterations in facial morphology or dental occlusion and without signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction were used as controls (CG). The T and M muscles were submitted to EMG bilaterally in the situations of mastication and mastication plus biting, with analysis of amplitude interval and root mean square. For all muscles tested, there was a difference between CG, P1 and P2; CG was higher than P2 and P2 higher than P1 in all situations assessed. We conclude that there was an increase in EMG activity in the T and M muscles after surgical correction of the dentofacial deformity accompanied by interdisciplinary treatment, although the values were still lower than those obtained for CG.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 03/2006; 35(2):170-3. · 1.51 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: After laryngectomy for treatment of pharyngeal/laryngeal carcinomas the patients may be rehabilitated, for oral communication, with the esophageal speech.
To study the intra-esophageal pressure during the esophageal speech.
It was measured the intra-esophageal pressure in 25 laryngectomized patients aged 40 to 70 years (median 57 years), 10 rehabilitated with esophageal speech and 15 unable to do so. The manometric method with continuous perfusion was used. The esophageal pressures was measured 3 to 5 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter when the patients tried to speak the vowel "a". Sometimes the air swallowed went to the stomach, with a peristaltic or simultaneous contraction in the esophageal body.
During the attempt of esophageal speech the intra-esophageal pressure was higher in patients able to have esophageal speech (26.4 +/- 10.1 mm Hg, mean +/- SD) than in patients unable to do so (13.7 +/- 7.2 mm Hg). The esophageal contraction after a swallow of air was also higher in patients with esophageal speech (45.3 +/- 8.6 mm Hg) than in patients unable to do so (33.8 +/- 13.1 mm Hg).
Laryngectomized patients rehabilitated with esophageal speech has a higher intra-esophageal pressure during speech than patients unable to do so, what may be consequence of the capacity to retain air inside the esophagus.
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia 38(3):158-61.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Laryngectomy for treatment of laryngeal-pharyngeal carcinomas may impair the sensation in the larynx and epiglottis, with consequent impairment of esophageal motility. Our aim in the present study was to investigate the esophageal motility of laryngectomized patients. Esophageal manometry was performed on 17 patients submitted to laryngectomy 2 to 71 months (median 29 months) before the examination. Eleven were rehabilitated with esophageal voice and six could not speak. Ten swallows of a 5 ml bolus of water were recorded at the lower esophageal sphincter and at 5, 10 and 15 cm above it. The lower esophageal sphincter pressure was measured by the rapid pull-through method and the upper esophageal sphincter pressure by the station pull-through method. The results were compared with those obtained for a control group of 40 healthy volunteers. The amplitude of contractions was lower and the number of nonperistaltic contractions was higher in laryngectomized patients than in volunteers (P < 0.05). The duration of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (7.4 +/- 1.5 s) was shorter in laryngectomized patients than in volunteers (8.8 +/- 1.6 s, P < 0.05). The upper esophageal sphincter pressure was lower (34.9 +/- 29.1 mm Hg) in laryngectomized patients than in volunteers (61.2 +/- 20.8 mm Hg, P < 0.05). There was no difference between groups in contraction duration or velocity, in the numbers of multipeaked or failed contractions, lower esophageal sphincter pressure or in the number of swallows followed by complete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. In conclusion, laryngectomy causes esophageal motility impairment characterized by low contraction amplitude, nonperistaltic contraction and shorter lower esophageal sphincter relaxation duration.
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia 36(3):112-6.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Individuals with dentofacial deformities present changes in masticatory muscles. The objective of the present study was to determine the influence of interdisciplinary treatment in cases of class III dentofacial deformities regarding the EMG activity of the temporal (T) and masseter (M) muscles. The study was conducted on 15 patients with class III dentofacial deformities who were submitted to orthodontic, oromyofunctional and surgical treatment and assigned to groups P1 (before surgery) and P2 (6–9 months after surgery). Fifteen individuals with no alterations in facial morphology or dental occlusion and without signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction were used as controls (CG). The T and M muscles were submitted to EMG bilaterally in the situations of mastication and mastication plus biting, with analysis of amplitude interval and root mean square. For all muscles tested, there was a difference between CG, P1 and P2; CG was higher than P2 and P2 higher than P1 in all situations assessed. We conclude that there was an increase in EMG activity in the T and M muscles after surgical correction of the dentofacial deformity accompanied by interdisciplinary treatment, although the values were still lower than those obtained for CG.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
