Matthias Meissnitzer

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany

Are you Matthias Meissnitzer?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)14.41 Total impact

  • Article: The pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat inhibits growth of hepatocellular carcinoma models by alternative pathways of apoptosis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inhibition of deacetylases represents a new treatment option for human cancer diseases. We applied the novel and potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) to human hepatocellular carcinoma models and investigated by which pathways tumor cell survival is influenced. HepG2 (p53wt) and Hep3B (p53null) responded to panobinostat treatment with a reduction of cell proliferation and a significant increase in apoptotic cell death at low micromolar concentrations. Apoptosis was neither mediated by the extrinsic nor the intrinsic pathway but quantitative RT-PCR showed an upregulation of CHOP, a marker of the unfolded protein response and endoplasmic reticulum stress with subsequent activation of caspase 12. Dependent on the p53 status, a transcriptional upregulation of p21(cip1/waf1), an increased phosphorylation of H2AX, and an activation of the MAPK pathway were observed. In a subcutaneous xenograft model, daily i.p. injections of 10 mg/kg panobinostat lead to a significant growth delay with prolonged overall survival, mediated by reduced tumor cell proliferation, increased apoptosis and reduced angiogenesis in tumor xenografts. Panobinostat increased the acetylation of histones H3 and H4. Panobinostat is a well tolerated new treatment option for HCC that activates alternative pathways of apoptosis, also in p53-deficient tumors.
    Cellular oncology: the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology 02/2010; 32(4):285-300. · 4.17 Impact Factor
  • Article: Cellular plasticity of trans- and dedifferentiation markers in human hepatoma cells in vitro and in vivo.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tumor cells have the capability to trans- and to dedifferentiate, for example by reactivating embryonic development genes and stem cell characteristics. The aim of our study was to show the differential expression of stem- and progenitor cell markers in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HCC). Different human HCC cell lines (HUH7, HUH7 5-15, HUH7 pcDNA3.1, Hep3B and HepG2) were cultured under standard conditions in vitro or implanted subcutaneously (5x10(6) cells) in male NMRI mice. Specimens were characterized by quantitative real-time PCR, Western blotting, methylation-specific PCR and immunohistochemistry for markers of differentiation (cytokeratins, vimentin), embryonic development or stem cells (PTC, PDX-1, SHH, Thy1, c-kit, CD34, beta-catenin, Ki-67). The investigated HCC cell lines showed different patterns of marker expression allowing to distinguish four distinct groups: the classical cholangiocellular type (Huh-7, Huh-7 pcDNA3.1, Hep3B) with expression of CK7/19, beta-catenin and CD34; a dedifferentiated mesenchymal-proliferative type (Huh-7 5-15) characterized by CK19, Vimentin and Ki-67; a dedifferentiated embryonic-development type (Hep3B implanted in matrigel) with expression of CK19, beta-catenin and PTC and a classical HCC type (HepG2) showing CK18/19 and beta-catenin expression. HCC cell lines showed significantly different expression patterns of differentiation markers in a xenograft model. Furthermore, direct association of some markers was observed. The groups differ from each other in expression patterns, but also show that environmental factors play an important role in the behaviour of cells.
    International Journal of Oncology 08/2009; 35(1):69-80. · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • Article: The dual EGF/VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor AEE788 inhibits growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts in nude mice.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated the effect of AEE788, a novel dual receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the EGF and the VEGF receptor, for treatment of human HCC cell lines and in a subcutaneous xenograft model. Cell viability and apoptosis of HepG2 and Hep3B cells incubated with 0.1-100 microM AEE788 were quantified. In vivo, HepG2 cells were xenografted to NMRI mice and animals were treated orally with 50 mg/kg AEE788 3x/week. Immunohistochemistry and quantitative Western blotting was performed for pathway analysis in vitro and in vivo. AEE788 reduced growth and induced apoptosis of HCC cells by disrupting mitochondrial transmembrane potentials and inhibiting MAPK phosphorylation. In the xenografts, AEE788 lead to a reduced tumor growth by reducing proliferation and vascularisation. Except for a reversible skin reaction and weight loss, no signs of toxicity were observed. AEE788 is a promising new option for the treatment of HCC.
    International Journal of Oncology 11/2008; 33(4):733-42. · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • Article: Inhibition of heme oxygenase 1 expression by small interfering RNA decreases orthotopic tumor growth in livers of mice.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endogenous overexpression of the antiapoptotic protein heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) has been shown to occur in various cancer diseases and might contribute to cancer progression. We compared the expression levels of HO-1 in human liver to expression levels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as the effect of HO-1 inhibition by small interfering RNA (siRNA) on cellular survival and apoptosis in the mouse hepatoma cell lines Hepa129 and Hepa1-6 and on orthotopic tumor growth in immune-competent C3H/HeN mice. Our results show that HO-1 is frequently overexpressed in human HCC. Downmodulation of HO-1 by siRNA resulted in increased cellular damage and apoptosis, reduced proliferation, reduced growth of orthotopic HCC and reduced angiogenesis. Livers and kidneys of treated animals did not reveal signs of damage by this treatment. In conclusion, a specific knockdown of HO-1 might represent a novel therapeutic approach in HCC therapy.
    International Journal of Cancer 07/2008; 123(6):1269-77. · 5.44 Impact Factor