Alison R Yung

University of Groningen, Groningen, Province of Groningen, Netherlands

Are you Alison R Yung?

Claim your profile

Publications (118)539.59 Total impact

  • Article: Sexual Trauma Increases the Risk of Developing Psychosis in an Ultra High-Risk "Prodromal" Population.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies indicate a high prevalence of childhood trauma in patient cohorts with established psychotic disorder and in those at risk of developing psychosis. A causal link between childhood trauma and development of psychosis has been proposed. We aimed to examine the association between experience of childhood trauma and the development of a psychotic disorder in a large "Ultra High Risk" (UHR) for psychosis cohort. The data were collected as part of a longitudinal cohort study of all UHR patients recruited to research studies at the Personal Assessment and Clinical Evaluation clinic between 1993 and 2006. Baseline data were collected at recruitment to these studies. The participants completed a comprehensive follow-up assessment battery (mean time to follow-up 7.5 years, range 2.4-14.9 years), which included the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), a self-report questionnaire that assesses experience of childhood trauma. The outcome of interest was transition to a psychotic disorder during the follow-up period. Data were available on 233 individuals. Total CTQ trauma score was not associated with transition to psychosis. Of the individual trauma types, only sexual abuse was associated with transition to psychosis (P = .02). The association remained when adjusting for potential confounding factors. Those with high sexual abuse scores were estimated to have a transition risk 2-4 times that of those with low scores. The findings suggest that sexual trauma may be an important contributing factor in development of psychosis for some individuals.
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 03/2013; · 8.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Dataset: McGorry et al Staging model
  • Article: Development and Validation of a New Measure of Everyday Adolescent Functioning: The Multidimensional Adolescent Functioning Scale.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Everyday functioning is an important outcome for studies of the developmental psychopathology of adolescence. An unbiased, well-validated, and easy-to-use instrument to specifically assess normal adolescent functioning is not yet available. The current study aimed to introduce and validate the Multidimensional Adolescent Functioning Scale (MAFS). METHODS: The MAFS was developed by clinical consensus, resulting in a 23-item self-report questionnaire with three distinct subscales: general functioning, family-related functioning, and peer-related functioning. MAFS data were collected in a general population sample (N = 842; mean age = 15.0 years [standard deviation = .4]) at baseline and again at 1- and 3-year follow-up. Psychometric analyses included confirmatory factor analysis, calculations of internal consistency, scale correlations, and correlations with the abridged General Health Questionnaire. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the hypothesized 3-factor structure fits well to the MAFS data. All scales showed adequate internal consistency (greatest lower bound: .75-.91) and sufficient discriminative ability (scale intercorrelations: ρ = .15-.52). Of the scales, general functioning was most strongly correlated with the General Health Questionnaire, whereas family- and peer-related functioning showed weaker correlations with this general measure. The results were stable across repeated measurements and gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: The MAFS is an easy-to-use instrument with good psychometric characteristics, which could be suitable for a broad range of future research applications, especially when a multidimensional and unbiased indication of normal adolescent functioning is required.
    Journal of Adolescent Health 02/2013; 52(2):195-200. · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Is basic self-disturbance in ultra-high risk for psychosis ('prodromal') patients associated with borderline personality pathology?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AIM: Research in the phenomenological tradition suggests that the schizophrenia spectrum is characterized by disturbance of the 'basic' self, whereas borderline personality disorder involves disturbance of the 'narrative' self. The current study investigated this proposal in an ultra-high risk for psychosis sample. METHODS: The sample consisted of 42 ultra-high-risk participants with a mean age of 19.22 years. Basic self-disturbance was measured using the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience. Borderline personality pathology was measured using the borderline personality disorder items from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) Axis II Personality Questionnaire. RESULTS: No correlation was found between the measures of basic self-disturbance and borderline personality pathology. CONCLUSIONS: The finding is consistent with the proposal that different (although not mutually exclusive) types of self-disturbance characterize the schizophrenia spectrum and borderline personality disorder. Further research should further examine the question of basic self-disturbance in patients with established borderline personality disorder.
    Early Intervention in Psychiatry 01/2013; · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Dataset: McGorry et al 2006 Staging paper
  • Article: Measuring psychosocial outcome is good.
    Ashleigh Lin, Stephen J Wood, Alison R Yung
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Poor psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia can be conceptualized as an early indicator of chronic neurodevelopmental illness. Alternatively, impaired psychosocial functioning could be the result of social and environmental factors associated with the onset of psychotic illness. We review recent evidence on psychosocial outcome in the early phases of psychotic illness, when young people are less removed from their developmental trajectory, any brain changes may be mutable and there may be greater opportunity for intervention. RECENT FINDINGS: In samples with first-episode psychosis, poor premorbid functioning, stable negative symptoms and impaired social cognition and neurocognition may indicate individuals likely to experience poor psychosocial outcome. There is also some evidence of social/environmental predictors of poor outcome. Recent findings from at-risk samples suggest similar patterns, although more research is needed. SUMMARY: It is likely that for some patients poor psychosocial outcome is the result of longstanding neurological changes, whereas for others it is related to the secondary consequences of having psychosis. We suggest that measuring psychosocial outcome in the early stages of psychosis is important for our understanding of the cause of schizophrenia, but argue for the importance of the patient's subjective view on their psychosocial recovery.
    Current opinion in psychiatry 01/2013; · 3.57 Impact Factor
  • Article: The Ultra-High Risk Concept-A Review.
    Alison R Yung, Barnaby Nelson
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attempts to identify people at imminent risk of psychotic disorder have been made during the past 20 years. High-risk criteria have been developed, and despite findings of a recent decline in the rate of onset of psychosis associated with these criteria, people identified still have a significantly greater risk, compared with the general population. Intervention studies in this group indicate that psychological treatments and fish oil appear to be just as effective as antipsychotics. Future research should refine risk factors for psychosis and examine outcomes other than psychosis. Research is also needed into what harms and benefits are associated with making the high-risk criteria into a formal diagnosis.
    Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie 01/2013; 58(1):5-12. · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • Article: Cognitive precursors of severe mental disorders.
    Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 01/2013; 18(1-2):1-8.
  • Article: Comorbid Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in 509 Individuals With an At-Risk Mental State: Impact on Psychopathology and Transition to Psychosis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:The current diagnostic system for subjects at enhanced clinical risk of psychosis allows concurrent comorbid diagnoses of anxiety and depressive disorders. Their impact on the presenting high-risk psychopathology, functioning, and transition outcomes has not been widely researched.Methods:In a large sample of subjects with an At-Risk Mental State (ARMS, n = 509), we estimated the prevalence of DSM/SCID anxiety or depressive disorders and their impact on psychopathology, functioning, and psychosis transition. A meta-analytical review of the literature complemented the analysis.Results:About 73% of ARMS subjects had a comorbid axis I diagnosis in addition to the "at-risk" signs and symptoms. About 40% of ARMS subjects had a comorbid diagnosis of depressive disorder while anxiety disorders were less frequent (8%). The meta-analysis conducted in 1683 high-risk subjects confirmed that baseline prevalence of comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders is respectively 41% and 15%. At a psychopathological level, comorbid diagnoses of anxiety or depression were associated with higher suicidality or self-harm behaviors, disorganized/odd/stigmatizing behavior, and avolition/apathy. Comorbid anxiety and depressive diagnoses were also associated with impaired global functioning but had no effect on risk of transition to frank psychosis. Meta-regression analyses confirmed no effect of baseline anxiety and/or depressive comorbid diagnoses on transition to psychosis.Conclusions:The ARMS patients are characterized by high prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in addition to their attenuated psychotic symptoms. These symptoms may reflect core emotional dysregulation processes and delusional mood in prodromal psychosis. Anxiety and depressive symptoms are likely to impact the ongoing psychopathology, the global functioning, and the overall longitudinal outcome of these patients.
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 11/2012; · 8.80 Impact Factor
  • Article: Transition to first episode psychosis in ultra high risk populations: Does baseline functioning hold the key?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Baseline functioning has been found to be a strong predictor of transition to psychosis in ultra high risk populations. However, the time course of functioning may enhance prediction. We investigated whether there were different patterns of functioning over time and whether particular temporal patterns were related to baseline characteristics and psychosis outcome. METHOD: Functional data was assessed at baseline and after 3 to 6year follow-up in an ultra high risk sample (n=158; 92 female, mean age=19.28 (SD=3.33), range=14-29). Using the median score of the GAF and the QLS scale, a 'High' and 'Low' group (comprising of subjects functioning above or below median at both baseline and follow-up) and a 'Deterioration' group and 'Improving' group were created. RESULTS: Chi-square analyses showed that the Low and Deteriorating functioning groups were the most likely to develop first-episode psychosis (FEP). Importantly, UHR individuals with deteriorating functioning were at higher risk of transition than those whose functioning was low at baseline but improved over time (GAF: X(2)=5.10, df=1, p=.02; QLS: X(2)=9.13, df=1, p=.003). Binary logistic regression analyses showed that a decline in functioning was more strongly associated with FEP (GAF: p=<.0001; QLS: p<.0001) than the level of baseline functioning (GAF: p=.005; QLS: p=.09). The deteriorating group could not be distinguished from the High group in terms of baseline symptomatology. DISCUSSION: With the addition of the 'low functioning' criterion to the UHR criteria, we may miss out on some true positive cases. Limiting our attention to baseline poor functioning may therefore distort the picture in terms of risk for psychosis.
    Biological Psychiatry 11/2012; · 8.28 Impact Factor
  • Article: Neurocognitive functioning in the prodrome of mania-an exploratory study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits have been well documented in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) after the first episode of mania. However, little is known about the presence of such deficits prior to the initial manic episode. METHODS: Participants were recruited from a cohort of 416 young people who were at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis and were followed up between 4 and 13 years later. The current report is of 16 participants who developed BD over a mean follow-up period of 8.2 years (UHR-BD). Baseline demographic, clinical and neurocognitive assessment scores were compared with those of 46 age and gender matched UHR subjects who did not transition to psychosis or BD over the follow-up period (UHR-NT) and 66 healthy comparison subjects. RESULTS: UHR-BD subjects had lower global functioning at baseline compared with UHR-NT subjects. There were no significant differences between UHR-BD and UHR-NT subjects on baseline demographic and neurocognitive characteristics. UHR-BD subjects had lower test performance than HC on picture completion, Trail-Making Tests and measures of global intelligence. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, limited and variable neurocognitive tests utilised and the confounding effects of psychotic symptoms might have impacted on the ability to detect meaningful clinical and neurocognitive differences. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, neurocognition in young people who later develop BD is similar to those of subjects who are at a high risk for psychotic disorders, but there may be certain neurocognitive markers that distinguish this group from unaffected and healthy young people.
    Journal of affective disorders 11/2012; · 3.76 Impact Factor
  • Article: Whither the attenuated psychosis syndrome?
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 11/2012; 38(6):1130-4. · 8.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Dataset: YWE10004 04-01 11
  • Article: Follow-up factor structure of schizotypy and its clinical associations in a help-seeking sample meeting ultra-high risk for psychosis criteria at baseline.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Schizotypy is a multidimensional construct indexing psychometric risk for schizophrenia. This study investigated the factor structure and clinical associations of the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE) short scales, assessed at follow-up in an originally help-seeking sample identified as ultra-high risk for psychosis. METHOD: Participants were 228 help-seeking individuals identified as ultra-high risk for psychosis between 2 and 14 years previously (mean, 7.09; SD, 3.17; median, 6.41). The 43-item O-LIFE short scales (Unusual Experiences, Introvertive Anhedonia, Cognitive Disorganization, Impulsive Nonconformity) and indices of depression, anxiety, positive and negative psychotic symptoms, functioning, and quality of life were administered at follow-up. Structural equation modeling was used. RESULTS: Impulsive Nonconformity was shown to be an unstable factor and was excluded. A 3-factor model of Unusual Experiences, Cognitive Disorganization, and Introvertive Anhedonia was found to be the best description of the data, compared with a 1-factor model. Unusual Experiences factor was associated with positive psychotic symptoms; Cognitive Disorganization was associated with depression and anxiety; and Introvertive Anhedonia was associated with positive and negative psychotic symptoms, quality of life, and functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The Impulsive Nonconformity factor of the O-LIFE short scales should be interpreted with caution. A well-fitting 3-factor model provides support for a dimensional structure in schizotypy that is similar to that of schizophrenia. Separate dimensions were differentially associated with psychopathology, functioning, and quality of life. The interpersonal dimension of schizotypy was the only dimension associated with poorer functioning and quality of life and may be a sensitive indicator of need for care.
    Comprehensive psychiatry 08/2012; · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • Article: Not all first-episode psychosis is the same: preliminary evidence of greater basic self-disturbance in schizophrenia spectrum cases.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AIM: Disturbance in the basic sense of self has previously been found to characterize schizophrenia spectrum disorders and to predict onset of psychosis in the ultra-high-risk population. The current study examined basic self-disturbance in a first-episode psychosis (FEP) population. We hypothesized that basic self-disturbance would be more prominent in cases with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder compared to those with other psychoses. METHOD: Sixteen FEP patients from Orygen Youth Health, Melbourne, were recruited to the study. Participants were assessed using the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. RESULTS: Basic self-disturbance scores were significantly higher in patients with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis (n = 8) compared to patients with other psychotic diagnoses (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: The findings are consistent with previous work indicating that the disturbance of the basic sense of self is more characteristic of schizophrenia spectrum psychosis than other psychoses. This may have implications for early diagnosis, clinical formulation and intervention.
    Early Intervention in Psychiatry 07/2012; · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Borderline personality features and development of psychosis in an 'ultra high risk' (UHR) population: a case control study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is clinical uncertainty as to whether borderline personality disorder (BPD) traits in those with an 'at risk mental state' have an effect on the risk of 'transition' to psychosis. We aimed to investigate the relationship between baseline BPD features, risk of transition and type of psychotic disorder experienced. This is a case-control study of 'ultra high risk' (UHR) for psychosis patients treated at the clinic, between 2004 and 2007. 'Cases' were UHR individuals who made the 'transition' to full threshold psychotic disorder within 24 months; 'control' group was a matched UHR sample who had not developed a psychotic disorder at 24 months. Individuals were matched on time of entry to the clinic, age and gender. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) BPD features were assessed from clinical assessments using a structured instrument (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorder for BPD (SCID-II BPD)). Psychosis diagnosis following transition was rated from the clinical files using the operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness (OPCRIT) computer algorithm. The number of BPD traits and number with full threshold BPD were compared in those who developed psychosis and those who did not. We analysed data from 48 cases and 48 controls. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of transition to psychosis for those with baseline full-threshold BPD, compared with those without BPD. The number of BPD traits or number with full threshold BPD did not differ by psychosis diagnosis grouping. Co-occurring BPD or BPD features does not appear to strongly influence the risk of short-term transition to psychosis or the risk of developing a non-affective psychotic disorder in this population.
    Early Intervention in Psychiatry 06/2012; 6(3):247-55. · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • Article: Markers of vulnerability to obsessive-compulsive disorder in an ultra-high risk sample of patients who developed psychosis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study aims to identify markers of vulnerability to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in an ultra-high risk sample of patients who developed psychosis. Three hundred and eleven patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis were examined at baseline and after a mean of 7.4 years follow-up. Patients who developed psychosis with OCD (PSY + OCD; n = 13) and psychosis without OCD (PSY - OCD; n = 45) were compared in terms of socio-demographic and clinical features. PSY + OCD patients displayed greater severity of depression before and after conversion to PSY + OCD, and increased rates of depressive disorders before exhibiting PSY + OCD. However, they only displayed greater severity of anxiety and increased rates of non-OCD anxiety disorders after psychosis. Further, PSY + OCD patients were more likely to report a positive family history for anxiety disorders than PSY - OCD. Although depression and a family history of anxiety disorder may act as vulnerability markers for OCD in psychosis, the resulting anxiety may be a correlate or a consequence of PSY + OCD.
    Early Intervention in Psychiatry 05/2012; 6(2):201-6. · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • Article: Precursors of schizophrenia
    Alison R. Yung, Patrick D. McGorry
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several likely precursors of schizophrenia have been identified. These range from possibly causative features, such as exposure to perinatal insults, to features that are the effects of an underlying vulnerability, such as abnormal childhood behaviors. Unfortunately none of these precursors is specific enough to be used in identifying individuals for targeted preventive treatment. A more useful strategy is to combine risk factors for psychotic disorders in a population seeking help for psychiatric problems. Thus, individuals who are possibly prodromal are identified. Research into this group has found high rates of onset of psychotic disorders, particularly schizophrenia, within a short time frame. Preliminary treatment trials suggest that symptoms can be reduced and psychosis onset possibly delayed or averted.
    Current Psychosis and Therapeutics Reports 04/2012; 2(2):67-72.
  • Article: Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) perception in ultra-high risk for psychosis participants who develop schizophrenia: Testing the evidence for an endophenotypic marker.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reports suggesting that schizophrenia participants are more likely to be phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) non-tasters when compared to controls have recently been controversial. If supported, a genetic-based phenotypic variation in PTC taster status is implicated, suggesting a greater illness risk for those participants with recessive alleles for the TAS2R38 receptor. Should PTC insensitivity be a schizophrenia endophenotype, then it would be expected in follow-up of ultra high-risk for psychosis participants who later develop schizophrenia (UHR-S). UHR-S was hypothesised to show reduced PTC sensitivity compared to those who were previously at risk, but did not transition (UHR-NP). PTC perception was assessed in 219 UHR participants at long-term follow-up, of whom 53 had transitioned to psychosis (UHR-P) during the follow-up period. Fifteen of the 219 participants were diagnosed with schizophrenia. Seventy-eight had a family history of psychotic disorder. No differences in PTC taster status were found in UHR participants based upon transition to psychosis status, schizophrenia diagnosis, or family history of schizophrenia. This report indicates that schizophrenia development among UHR participants is not associated with PTC tasting deficits and fails to support previous findings that inability to detect the bitter taste of PTC is a schizophrenia endophenotype.
    Psychiatry Research 04/2012; · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • Article: Basic Self-Disturbance Predicts Psychosis Onset in the Ultra High Risk for Psychosis "Prodromal" Population.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction:Phenomenological research indicates that disturbance of the basic sense of self may be a core phenotypic marker of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Basic self-disturbance refers to a disruption of the sense of ownership of experience and agency of action and is associated with a variety of anomalous subjective experiences. In this study, we investigated the presence of basic self-disturbance in an "ultra high risk" (UHR) for psychosis sample compared with a healthy control sample and whether it predicted transition to psychotic disorder.Methods:Forty-nine UHR patients and 52 matched healthy control participants were recruited to the study. Participants were assessed for basic self-disturbance using the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE) instrument. UHR participants were followed for a mean of 569 days.Results:Levels of self-disturbance were significantly higher in the UHR sample compared with the healthy control sample (P < .001). Cox regression indicated that total EASE score significantly predicted time to transition (P < .05) when other significant predictors were controlled for. Exploratory analyses indicated that basic self-disturbance scores were higher in schizophrenia spectrum cases, irrespective of transition to psychosis, than nonschizophrenia spectrum cases.Discussion:The results indicate that identifying basic self-disturbance in the UHR population may provide a means of further "closing in" on individuals truly at high risk of psychotic disorder, particularly of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This may be of practical value by reducing inclusion of "false positive" cases in UHR samples and of theoretical value by shedding light on core phenotypic features of schizophrenia spectrum pathology.
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 02/2012; · 8.80 Impact Factor

Institutions

  • 2013
    • University of Groningen
      • Department of Psychiatry
      Groningen, Province of Groningen, Netherlands
    • The University of Manchester
      Manchester, ENG, United Kingdom
    • University of Birmingham
      • School of Psychology
      Birmingham, ENG, United Kingdom
  • 2003–2013
    • University of Melbourne
      • • Orygen Centre for Youth Mental Health
      • • Department of Psychiatry
      Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 2012
    • Universität Köln
      Köln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
    • Orygen Youth Health
      Parkerville, Western Australia, Australia
    • Academisch Medisch Centrum Universiteit van Amsterdam
      • Academic Medical Center
      Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
  • 2011
    • Maastricht University
      • MHeNS School for Mental Health and Neuroscience
      Maastricht, Provincie Limburg, Netherlands
  • 2010
    • Université de Lausanne
      Lausanne, VD, Switzerland
    • University of Toyama
      Toyama-shi, Toyama-ken, Japan
  • 2005–2008
    • Royal Melbourne Hospital
      Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    • Sichuan University
      Chengdu, Sichuan Sheng, China
  • 2007
    • Diabetes Australia, Victoria
      Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 2004
    • King's College London
      • Department of Psychological Medicine
      London, ENG, United Kingdom