-
Bernard Chevalier,
Robert Moulichon,
Emmanuel Teiger,
Philippe Brunel,
Jean-Philippe Metzger,
Michel Pansieri,
Didier Carrie, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Kristel Wittebols,
Christian Spaulding,
Jean Fajadet
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objectives : We compared the efficacy of the Cypher Select™ (Cordis Corporation, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus balloon angioplasty (BA) in in-stent restenosis (ISR) of Taxus™ or Taxus Liberté™ paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) or Cypher/Cypher Select SES. Background : Optimal treatment strategies have not been identified for drug-eluting stent (DES) ISR. Methods : Patients with a native coronary artery SES or PES ISR were randomized to SES or BA. In addition, a control group included BMS ISR treated with SES. Angiographic control was performed at 12 months. Results : 281 patients were enrolled. Significant differences favoring SES over BA were noted in immediate and net gain (1.39 ± 0.51 vs. 0.97 ± 0.54 mm, P < 0.0001 and 1.07 ± 0.69 vs. 0.49 ± 0.67 mm, P < 0.0001), 12-month mean luminal diameter (MLD; 2.14 ± 0.62 vs. 1.71 ± 0.55 mm, P < 0.0001) and percent diameter stenosis (%DS; 21 ± 19.24 vs. 29.82 ± 18.47, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference at 12 months between SES and BA in the primary end-point late lumen loss (LLL; 0.37 ± 0.57 vs.0.41 ± 0.63, P = 0.73) and in in-stent binary restenosis (11.1% vs. 14%, P = 0.59). Target-lesion revascularization (TLR) was numerically lower in patients treated with SES (5.9% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.097). There was no difference according to the initial DES. In contrast, significantly higher immediate and net gains and MLD were noted in the BMS control group treated by SES. Conclusions : In this angiographic randomized trial comparing SES and BA in SES or PES restenosis, 12 month MLD, immediate and net gain, and %DS favored SES whereas no difference was noted in LLL. Condensed Abstract Optimal treatment strategies have not been identified for sirolimus- (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in-stent restenosis (ISR). We randomized patients with a native coronary artery SES or PES ISR to SES or BA. In addition, a control group included BMS ISR treated with SES. There was no difference in the primary end-point, late lumen loss (LLL) at 12 months between the SES and BA groups. However, follow-up MLD and immediate and net gain favored SES. (J Interven Cardiol 2012;**:1-10).
Journal of Interventional Cardiology 09/2012; · 1.18 Impact Factor
-
Jan-Malte Sinning,
Dietrich Baumgart,
Nikos Werner,
Volker Klauss,
Frank M Baer,
Franz Hartmann,
Helmut Drexler,
Wolfgang Motz,
Heinrich Klues,
Wolfram Voelker,
Thomas Pfannebecker, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Georg Nickenig
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Because a delayed arterial healing response after drug-eluting stent implantation has raised concerns about safety in diabetic patients, long-term effects of treatment with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), as compared with bare-metal stent (BMS), have to be established. The aim of the 5-year follow-up of the randomized, controlled, open-label multicenter SCORPIUS study was to assess long-term safety and efficacy of the CYPHER (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Bridgewater, NJ) SES in percutaneous coronary intervention of diabetic patients.
A total of 190 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to receive either a SES (n = 95) or a BMS (n = 95). Dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) was prescribed for at least 6 months. Clinical follow-up data were scheduled at 1, 8, and 12 months and 5 years.
Treatment with SES resulted in a 16% decrease in the rate of major adverse cardiac events (36% vs 52%; hazard ratio 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9; P = .02). This reduction in major adverse cardiac events with SES at 5 years was mostly attributable to a lower number of repeat target lesion revascularization (13% vs 29%; hazard ratio 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7; P = .003). No differences between groups were observed for safety end points (all-cause mortality 21% vs 21%, cardiac death 15% vs 13%, repeat myocardial infarction 8% vs 9%, and stent thrombosis 5% vs 6%) at 5 years.
The 5-year follow-up of the SCORPIUS trial demonstrates the long-term antirestenotic efficacy of SES in diabetic patients with significantly reduced target lesion revascularization and comparable rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis compared with BMS.
American heart journal 03/2012; 163(3):446-53, 453.e1. · 4.65 Impact Factor
-
Florim Cuculi,
Adrian P Banning,
Alexander Abizaid,
Antonio L Bartorelli,
Ana C Baux,
Vladimir Dzavík,
Stepehen Ellis,
Runlin Gao,
David Holmes,
Myung H Jeong,
Victor Legrand,
Franz-Josef Neumann,
Maria Nyakern,
Christian Spaulding, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Stephen Worthley,
Philip Urban
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to multiple coronary lesions during the same procedure has potential economic and social advantages. However comprehensive outcome data of real world practice in a large population is limited. We aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes between patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who either underwent single- or multivessel PCI within the e-SELECT registry.
The e-SELECT registry combines data collected at 320 medical centres in 56 countries where patients received CYPHER Select® or CYPHER Select® Plus sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). Rates of myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (defined as any death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation) were compared between patients undergoing single-vessel versus multivessel PCI. A total of 15,147 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in the e-SELECT registry. Two thousand two hundred and seventy-eight (2,278) subjects (15%) underwent multivessel PCI and 12,869 (85%) had single-vessel PCI. The mean age was higher in the multivessel PCI group (63 vs. 62 years, p<0.001) and there was a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (32.4 vs. 30.0%, p=0.02). Lesions were more complex in the single-PCI group while pre- and post-dilatation were less common in the multivessel PCI group. Myocardial infarction within the first 30 days post PCI was more common in the multivessel PCI group (1.9 vs. 0.8%, p<0.001) and most of the infarctions were periprocedural (1.3 vs. 0.6%, p=0.001). Mortality and myocardial infarction at one-year were higher in the multivessel PCI group resulting in a significantly higher MACE (6.1 vs. 4.6%, p=0.005).
Overall procedural and one year outcomes were excellent for both single- and multivessel procedures. However despite lower lesion complexity, performing multivessel PCI was associated with higher rates of periprocedural myocardial infarction and MACE when compared to single-vessel PCI in the e-SELECT registry.
EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 12/2011; 7(8):962-8. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
Christian Spaulding,
Emmanuel Teiger,
Philippe Commeau,
Olivier Varenne,
Ezio Bramucci,
Michel Slama,
Keavin Beatt,
Ashok Tirouvanziam,
Lech Polonski,
Pieter R Stella, [......],
Xavier de Boisgelin,
Christophe Bode,
Didier Carrié,
Andrejs Erglis,
Bela Merkely,
Stefan Hosten,
Ana Cebrian,
Patrick Wang, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Patrick Henry
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the CYPHER (Cordis, Johnson and Johnson, Bridgewater, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (SES) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Concern over the safety of drug-eluting stents implanted during PCI for STEMI remains, and long-term follow-up from randomized trials are necessary. TYPHOON (Trial to assess the use of the cYPHer sirolimus-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction treated with ballOON angioplasty) randomized 712 patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI to receive either SES (n = 355) or bare-metal stents (BMS) (n = 357). The primary end point, target vessel failure at 1 year, was significantly lower in the SES group than in the BMS group (7.3% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.004) with no increase in adverse events.
A 4-year follow-up was performed. Complete data were available in 501 patients (70%), and the survival status is known in 580 patients (81%).
Freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 4 years was significantly better in the SES group (92.4% vs. 85.1%; p = 0.002); there were no significant differences in freedom from cardiac death (97.6% and 95.9%; p = 0.37) or freedom from repeat myocardial infarction (94.8% and 95.6%; p = 0.85) between the SES and BMS groups. No difference in definite/probable stent thrombosis was noted at 4 years (SES: 4.4%, BMS: 4.8%, p = 0.83). In the 580 patients with known survival status at 4 years, the all-cause death rate was 5.8% in the SES and 7.0% in the BMS group (p = 0.61).
In the 70% of patients with complete follow-up at 4 years, SES demonstrated sustained efficacy to reduce TLR with no difference in death, repeat myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. (The Study to Assess AMI Treated With Balloon Angioplasty [TYPHOON]; NCT00232830).
01/2011; 4(1):14-23. · 1.07 Impact Factor
-
John A Ormiston,
Alexandre Abizaid,
John Spertus,
Jean Fajadet,
Laura Mauri,
Joachim Schofer,
Stefan Verheye,
Joseph Dens,
Leif Thuesen,
Christophe Dubois,
Rainer Hoffmann,
William Wijns,
Peter J Fitzgerald,
Jeffrey J Popma,
Nathalie Macours,
Ana Cebrian, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Campbell Rogers,
Christian Spaulding
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis and reintervention rates but are complicated by stent thrombosis, which may be related to polymer coating. The NEVO sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (NEVO SES) is designed to improve long-term percutaneous coronary intervention safety by combining sirolimus release from reservoirs with bioabsorbable polymer to reduce spatial and temporal polymer exposure.
NEVO ResElution-I was a prospective randomized study in 394 patients with coronary artery disease comparing the NEVO SES with the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (TAXUS Liberté PES) stent. The primary end point was in-stent angiographic late loss at 6 months. Six months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the primary end point favored NEVO SES (0.13±0.31 mm versus 0.36±0.48 mm, P<0.001 for noninferiority and superiority). The study was not powered for clinical end points and showed no significant difference for NEVO SES versus TAXUS Liberté PES: death: 0.5 versus 1.6%, P=0.36; myocardial infarction: 2.0 versus 2.6%, P=0.75; target lesion revascularization: 1.5 versus 3.2%, P=0.33; major adverse cardiac events: 4.0 versus 7.4%, P=0.19. No stent thrombosis was observed with NEVO SES, whereas 2 cases occurred in TAXUS Liberté PES. Intravascular ultrasound showed lower percent volume obstruction for NEVO SES (5.5±11% versus 11.5±9.7%, P=0.016).
This trial proved the superiority of NEVO SES over TAXUS Liberté PES for the primary angiographic end point of in-stent late loss. No stent thrombosis occurred in the NEVO SES group.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00606333.
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 11/2010; 3(6):556-64. · 6.06 Impact Factor
-
Ron T van Domburg,
Joost Daemen,
Marie-Claude Morice,
Bernard de Bruyne,
Antonio Colombo,
Carlos Macaya,
Gert Richardt,
Jean Fajadet,
Christian Hamm,
Gerrit-Anne van Es,
Kristel Wittebols,
Nathalie Macours, Hans Peter Stoll,
Patrick W Serruys
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Assessment of health related quality-of-life (HRQL) has become increasingly important as not only the clinician's view of the technical success, but also the patient's perception is being measured. We evaluated the HRQL following sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (SES) (CYPHER(R); Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ, USA) implantation in patients with multivessel disease, comparing the outcomes with the historical surgical and bare metal stent (BMS) arms of the ARTS-I study.
The HRQL outcomes were compared to the outcome of the historical cohorts of the randomised ARTS-I trial using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. HRQL was evaluated at baseline, at one month and at 6, 12 and 36 months after revascularisation using the SF-36 in patients treated with SES (n=585), BMS (n=483) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (n=492). The HRQL compliance rates varied from 100% at baseline to 92% at 36 months. Both stenting and CABG resulted in significant improvement of HRQL and anginal status. There was a trend towards better HRQL after CABG than BMS beyond six months. Already from the first month up to three years, SES patients had, on average, 10% significantly better HRQL than BMS patients on the HRQL subscales physical functioning, role physical functioning, role emotional functioning and mental health (p<0.01) and a trend towards better HRQL in the other subscales. Up to 12 months, the HRQL was better after SES than CABG and was identical thereafter. At all time points, angina was more prevalent in the BMS group than in both the SES and CABG groups, in which the incidence of angina was similar. At three years, 10% of the SES patients suffered from angina, 13% of the CABG patients and 20% of the BMS patients.
Both stenting and CABG resulted in a significant improvement in HRQL and angina. Along with a substantial reduction of restenosis, HRQL after SES was significantly improved as compared with BMS, and was similar to CABG.
EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 04/2010; 5(8):962-7. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
Patrick W Serruys,
Yoshinobu Onuma,
Scot Garg,
Pascal Vranckx,
Bernard De Bruyne,
Marie-Claude Morice,
Antonio Colombo,
Carlos Macaya,
Gert Richardt,
Jean Fajadet,
Christian Hamm,
Monique Schuijer,
Tessa Rademaker,
Kristel Wittebols, Hans Peter Stoll
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to compare the 5-year clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in the ARTS II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study II) with the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and bare-metal stenting (BMS) from the ARTS I.
The long-term outcomes after SES implantation in patients with multivessel disease remains to be established.
The ARTS I was a randomized trial of 1,205 patients with multivessel disease comparing CABG and BMS. The ARTS II study was a nonrandomized trial with the Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (Cordis, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Warren, New Jersey), applying the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, end points, and protocol definitions. The ARTS II trial enrolled 607 patients, with an attempt to enroll at least one-third of patients with 3-vessel disease.
At 5-year, the death/stroke/myocardial infarction event-free survival rate was 87.1% in ARTS II SES, versus 86.0% (p = 0.1) and 81.9% (p = 0.007) in ARTS I CABG and BMS cohorts, respectively. The 5-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rate in ARTS II (27.5%) was significantly higher than ARTS I CABG (21.1%, p = 0.02), and lower than in ARTS I BMS (41.5%, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of definite stent thrombosis was 3.8%. Thirty-two percent (56 of 176) of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 5 years were related to possible, probable, or definite stent thrombosis.
At 5 years, SES had a safety record comparable to CABG and superior to BMS, and a MACCE rate that was higher than in patients treated with CABG, and lower than in those treated with BMS. Approximately one-third of the events seen with SES could be prevented through the elimination of early, late, and very late stent thrombosis.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 01/2010; 55(11):1093-101. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
Yoseph Rozenman,
Valentin Witzling,
Israel Tamari,
Vladimir Turkisher,
Michael Kriviski,
Christoph Bode,
Patrick Henry,
Emmanuel Teiger,
Ana Cebrian, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Christian Spaulding
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Stent length is a major predictor of restenosis in stable patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stents (BMS). The effect of stent length is decreased by using drug eluting stents, however, this association had not been previously determined in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to determine the impact of stent length on restenosis in patients who undergo primary PCI for AMI.
Three-hundred and fifty-seven and 355 patients with AMI were included respectively in the BMS and SES (sirolimus eluting stents) arms of the Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON). Patients were divided into four subgroups based on the total length of the culprit lesion stented segment (in mm) : <18, >or=18 and <23, >or=23 and < 28, and >or=28 (groups 1 - 4 respectively). Target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and angiographic late loss were used to assess the restenotic process. Despite similar lesion length, average stent length was longer in patients treated with SES as compared to BMS 22.1+/-8.6 and 20.3+/-8.2 mm respectively, p=0.005. The rate of 12m death and AMI was similar in SES and BMS. There was no significance influence of stent length on % TLR neither in BMS (12.6, 10.1, 17.4 and 12.3 - subgroups 1-4 respectively) nor in SES (3.9, 5, 2.2 and 2.7 respectively). There was also no significant impact of stent length on angiographic late loss (mm) neither in BMS (0.7, 0.87, 0.84 and 0.92 respectively) nor in SES (0.32, 0.0, 0.11 and 0.3 respectively).
Physicians tend to choose longer SES than BMS for a similar lesion length during primary PCI for AMI. Interestingly, stent length did not affect clinical or angiographic restenosis neither in BMS nor in SES in this group of patients who underwent primary PCI for acute MI. This data challenges current practice concerning the chosen stent length in patients with AMI.
EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 07/2009; 5(2):219-23. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
N Kukreja,
P W Serruys,
B De Bruyne,
A Colombo,
C Macaya,
G Richardt,
J Fajadet,
C Hamm,
D Goedhart,
N Macours, H P Stoll
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The The Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS)-II trial found no differences in survival or overall adverse events between sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and the surgical arm of ARTS-I. Nevertheless, existing data suggest that patients with disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) may derive particular benefit from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We therefore analysed the clinical outcome of patients in ARTS-I and ARTS-II with proximal LAD involvement.
Multicentre observational study.
Forty-five European academic hospitals.
Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Patients in ARTS-II with proximal LAD disease treated with SES (289/607, 48%) were compared with 187/600 (31%) bare metal stent patients (ARTS-I BMS) and 206/605 (34%) surgical patients (ARTS-I CABG) with proximal LAD involvement from ARTS-I.
Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after 3 years.
The Arterial Revascularization Therapies study part 2 (ARTS-II) subgroup had better survival than both ARTS-I groups (ARTS-II 98.6% vs ARTS-I BMS 95.7%, p = 0.05 and vs ARTS-I CABG 94.7%, p = 0.01) and lower rates of the hard clinical composite endpoint of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (ARTS-II 3.1% vs ARTS-I BMS 9.6%, p = 0.002 and vs ARTS-I CABG 9.7%, p = 0.002). Although the ARTS-I CABG patients had a lower need for repeat revascularisation than ARTS-II (5.3% vs 13.1%, p = 0.002), the overall composite adverse event rates (death, myocardial infarction, stroke or any repeat revascularisation) were not significantly different between the ARTS-I CABG and ARTS-II patients (15.0% vs 18.0%, p = 0.4).
SES are not inferior to CABG or bare metal stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary disease including involvement of the proximal LAD.
Heart (British Cardiac Society) 04/2009; 95(13):1061-6. · 4.22 Impact Factor
-
Sophia Vaina,
Vassilis Voudris,
Marie-Claude Morice,
Bernard De Bruyne,
Antonio Colombo,
Carlos Macaya,
Gert Richardt,
Jean Fajadet,
Christian Hamm,
Monique Schuijer,
Nathalie Macours, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Dennis V Cokkinos,
Christodoulos Stefanadis,
Patrick W Serruys
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of the current study was to compare the short and mid-term outcome between males and females treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and drug-eluting stent implantation in the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study I and II (ARTS I and II).
The patients included in ARTS I were randomised to PCI with bare metal stents or to CABG. The patients enrolled in ARTS II were treated with Cypher stent implantation. All patients were scheduled for clinical follow-up at one, six and twelve months, and after three and five years. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) included death, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), myocardial infarction (MI), repeat target vessel PCI (RPCI) and CABG. At one and three-year follow-up in ARTS II, both the female and male patients had an incidence of MACCE similar to ARTS I-CABG. When comparing the female and male population of ARTS II, there were no differences between the two genders in terms of in-hospital outcome. At one year and three years there were no gender specific differences in the incidence of MACCE.
Female and male patients in ARTS II had significantly lower MACCE rates compared with ARTS I-PCI, but similar to that of ARTS I-CABG. In ARTS II, MACCE free survival was similar for the two genders at three years follow-up.
EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 02/2009; 4(4):492-501. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
Joost Daemen,
Karl Heinz Kuck,
Carlos Macaya,
Victor LeGrand,
Maarten Vrolix,
Didier Carrie,
Imad Sheiban,
Maarten Jan Suttorp,
Pascal Vranckx,
Tessa Rademaker,
Dick Goedhart,
Monique Schuijer,
Kristel Wittebols,
Nathalie Macours, Hans Peter Stoll,
Patrick W Serruys
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to assess the 3-year outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients who had multivessel coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus.
The optimal method of revascularization in diabetic patients remains in dispute.
The ARTS-II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study-Part II) trial is a single-arm study (n = 607) that included 159 diabetic patients treated with SES whose 3-year clinical outcome was compared with that of the historical diabetic and nondiabetic arms of the randomized ARTS-I trial (n = 1,205, including 96 diabetic patients in the CABG arm and 112 in the PCI arm).
At 3 years, among nondiabetic patients, the incidence of the primary composite of death, CVA, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]), was significantly lower in ARTS-II than in ARTS-I PCI (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 0.64) and similar to ARTS-I CABG. The ARTS-II patients were at significantly lower risk for death, CVA, and MI as compared with both the ARTS-I PCI (adjusted OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.91) and ARTS-I CABG patients (adjusted OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.92). Among diabetic patients, the incidence of MACCE in ARTS-II was similar to that of both PCI and CABG in ARTS-I. Conversely, the incidence of death, CVA, and MI was significantly lower in ARTS-II than in ARTS-I PCI (adjusted OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.65) and was similar to that of ARTS-I CABG.
At 3 years, PCI using SES for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease seems to be safer and more efficacious than PCI using bare-metal stents, irrespective of the diabetic status of the patient. Hence, PCI using SES appears to be a valuable alternative to CABG for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 01/2009; 52(24):1957-67. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
Ahmed A Khattab,
Joost Daemen,
Gert Richardt,
Philippe Rioux,
Franz-Wolfgang Amann,
Richard Levy,
Ivan G Horvath,
Rui C Teles,
Fath Ordoubadi,
Magdaleen Pieters,
Kristel Wittebols, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Patrick W Serruys
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The differential safety and efficacy profiles of sirolimus-eluting stents when implanted in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who have increased body mass indexes (BMIs) compared with those with normal BMIs are largely unknown. This study evaluated the impact of BMI on 1-year outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stents as part of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Part II (ARTS II). From February to November 2003, 607 patients were included at 45 centers; 176 patients had normal BMIs (<25 kg/m(2)), 289 were overweight (> or =25 and < or =30 kg/m(2)), and 142 were obese (>30 kg/m(2)). At 30 days, the cumulative incidence of the primary combined end point of death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and repeat revascularization (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events) was 3.4% in the group with normal BMIs, 3.1% in overweight patients, and 2.8% in obese patients (p = 0.76). At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was 10.8%, 11.8%, and 7.0% in the normal BMI, overweight, and obese groups, respectively (p = 0.31). In conclusion, BMI had no impact on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stents in ARTS II.
The American Journal of Cardiology 06/2008; 101(11):1550-9. · 3.37 Impact Factor
-
Patrick W Serruys,
Joost Daemen,
Marie-Claude Morice,
Bernard De Bruyne,
Antonio Colombo,
Carlos Macaya,
Gert Richardt,
Jean Fajadet,
Christian Hamm,
Keith D Dawkins,
Pascal Vranckx,
Marco Bressers,
Ron van Domburg,
Monique Schuijer,
Kristel Wittebols,
Magdaleen Pieters, Hans Peter Stoll
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Aims: Late stent thrombosis has been documented in on- and off-label populations. Stent thrombosis is more frequently in higher risk patients and there is still scarce data about the impact on late adverse cardiac events. The aim therefore is to determine the 3-year safety and effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (SES) (Cypher(R)) implantation in patients with multivessel disease and to compare outcomes with the historical results of the two arms of the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study (ARTS-I). Methods and results: ARTS-II is a 45 centre, 607 patient single-arm study. Three years outcomes were compared to the outcome of the historical cohorts of ARTS-I using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) definitions. Patients were stratified by clinical site to ensure that at least 1/3 had 3-vessel disease to achieve a number of treated lesions per patient comparable to ARTS-I. Stent thrombosis was re-adjudicated using the ARC definitions. An angiographic coronary score to characterise lesion complexity was applied to allow the identification of patients who might benefit the most from multivessel stenting. In ARTS-II, 46.6% of the patients underwent 3-vessel treatment as compared to 18.0% in ARTS-I percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=600) with bare metal stents (BMS). Diabetes was present in 26.2% in ARTS-II as compared to 17.3% in ARTS-I. In ARTS-II, patients received on average 3.7 stents resulting in a mean total stented length of 72.5 mm. The 3-year survival rate in ARTS-II was 97.0%, comparable to the 95.6% and 96.0% of the historical surgical (n=605) and PCI cohorts of ARTS-I. The death/cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/myocardial infarction (MI) event free survival rate in ARTS-II was 91.7%, versus 89.1% (p=0.1) and 87.2% (p=0.007) in ARTS-I coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and PCI cohorts, respectively. Freedom from revascularisation in ARTS-II was 85.5%, lower than in ARTS-I CABG (93.4%; p<0.001) but higher than in ARTS-I PCI (73.7%; p<0.001) cohorts. MACCE free survival was 80.6% in ARTS-II, comparable to ARTS-I CABG (83.8%; p=0.21) but superior to ARTS-I PCI (66.0%; p<0.0001). The incidence of stent thrombosis (ARC any) in ART-II was 6.4% (39/607 patients). Conclusions: Despite the higher clinical and angiographic risk profile, the overall MACCE rate at three years was lower in ARTS-II than in the ARTS-I PCI and comparable to ARTS-I CABG. However, the re-intervention rate in ARTS-I CABG remained significantly lower than in ARTS-II.
EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 01/2008; 3(4):450-9. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study examined the clinical outcomes at 5 years in RAVEL (A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization), the first controlled trial of drug-eluting stents.
The 6-month rate of angiographic coronary restenosis has been markedly lowered by sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). The long-term performance of drug-eluting stents, however, is under close scrutiny.
The trial included 238 patients (mean age 60.7 +/- 10.4 years, 76% men) with a single, de novo native coronary artery lesion, randomly assigned to treatment with SES versus bare-metal stents (BMS). Rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous or surgical revascularization up to 5 years of follow-up, and rates of stent thrombosis were compared between the 2 treatment groups.
Complete datasets were available in 92.5% of patients treated with SES and 89.1% of patients assigned to BMS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of survival free from target lesion revascularization (TLR) were, respectively, 99.2%, 93.8%, and 89.7% in the SES group versus 75.9%, 75.0%, and 74.0% in the control group (p < 0.001; log-rank). Rates of all MACE at 5 years were 25.8% in patients treated with SES versus 35.2% in patients assigned to BMS (p = 0.03; log-rank). Rates of stent thrombosis, per protocol or by the Academic Research Consortium definitions, were similar in both groups.
The 5-year rate of TLR associated with SES was significantly lower than that with BMS. There was no apparent adverse effect associated with the use of SES, although the trial was not powered to examine uncommon complications.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 11/2007; 50(14):1299-304. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
Dietrich Baumgart,
Volker Klauss,
Frank Baer,
Franz Hartmann,
Helmut Drexler,
Wolfgang Motz,
Heinrich Klues,
Stefan Hofmann,
Wolfgang Völker,
Thomas Pfannebecker, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Georg Nickenig
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study sought to analyze the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in a high-risk group of diabetic patients. Previously, this had been analyzed only in substudies of larger trials or in clinical investigations enrolling a small number of patients.
Drug-eluting stents are highly effective in reducing the rate of in-stent restenosis.
Two hundred patients with diabetes and de novo coronary artery lesions were enrolled in 16 centers: 98 were randomly assigned to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and 102 received bare-metal stents (BMS). The primary end point was in-segment late luminal loss. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was analyzed at 30 days and 8 and 12 months.
The extent of in-segment late luminal loss in the SES group was 0.18 mm compared with 0.74 mm in the BMS group. In-segment restenosis was identified on follow-up angiography in 8.8% of the patients in SES and in 42.1% in BMS (p < 0.0001). Target lesion revascularization was performed in 5.3% of the patients in SES and in 21.1% of the patients in BMS (p = 0.002). The SES was effective in the treatment group with oral diabetic medication as well as in the insulin-dependent treatment group (3.6% SES vs. 38.8% BMS). There was no subacute stent thrombosis in the SES group up to 1 year. The MACE rate was not significantly different at 30 days. At 12 months, MACE rate was 14.7% in SES versus 35.8% in BMS.
The SES is safe and highly effective in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease and associated with a significant decrease in the extent of late luminal loss.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 10/2007; 50(17):1627-34. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
Markus Zähringer,
Marc Sapoval,
Peter M T Pattynama,
Claudio Rabbia,
Claudio Vignali,
Geert Maleux,
Louis Boyer,
Malgorzata Szczerbo-Trojanowska,
Werner Jaschke,
Geir Hafsahl,
Mark Downes,
Jean-Paul Bérégi,
Nic J G M Veeger, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Aly Talen
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the patency of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS).
Between November 2001 to June 2003, 105 consecutive symptomatic patients (53 men; mean age 65.7 years) with RAS were treated with either a bare-metal (n=52) or a drug-eluting (n=53) low-profile Palmaz-Genesis peripheral stent at 11 centers in a prospective nonrandomized trial. The primary endpoint was the angiographic result at 6 months measured with quantitative vessel analysis by an independent core laboratory. Secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success, clinical patency [no target lesion revascularization (TLR)], blood pressure and antihypertensive drug use, worsening of renal function, and no major adverse events at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months.
At 6 months, the overall in-stent diameter stenosis for BMS was 23.9%+/-22.9% versus 18.7%+/-15.6% for SES (p=0.39). The binary restenosis rate was 6.7% for SES versus 14.6% for the BMS (p=0.30). After 6 months and 1 year, TLR rate was 7.7% and 11.5%, respectively, in the BMS group versus 1.9% at both time points in the SES group (p=0.21). This rate remained stable up to the 2-year follow-up but did not reach significance due to the small sample. Even as early as 6 months, both types of stents significantly improved blood pressure and reduced antihypertensive medication compared to baseline (p<0.01). After 6 months, renal function worsened in 4.6% of the BMS patients and in 6.9% of the SES group. The rate of major adverse events was 23.7% for the BMS group and 26.8% for the SES at 2 years (p=0.80).
The angiographic outcome at 6 months did not show a significant difference between BMS and SES. Renal artery stenting with both stents significantly improved blood pressure. Future studies with a larger patient population and longer angiographic follow-up are warranted to determine if there is a significant benefit of drug-eluting stents in treating ostial renal artery stenosis.
Journal of Endovascular Therapy 08/2007; 14(4):460-8. · 2.86 Impact Factor
-
Marco Valgimigli,
Patrick Washington Serruys,
Keiichi Tsuchida,
Sophia Vaina,
Marie-Angèle Morel,
Marcel J van den Brand,
Antonio Colombo,
Marie Claude Morice,
Keith Dawkins,
Bernard de Bruyne,
Ran Kornowski,
Stefano de Servi,
Giulio Guagliumi,
J Wouter Jukema,
Frederick W Mohr,
Arie-Pieter Kappetein,
Kristel Wittebols, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Eric Boersma,
Giovanni Parrinello
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Syntax score (SXscore) was recently developed as a comprehensive angiographic scoring system aiming to assist in patient selection and risk stratification of patients with extensive coronary artery disease undergoing contemporary revascularization. A validation of this angiographic classification scheme is lacking. We assessed its predictive value in patients who underwent percutaneous intervention (PCI) for 3-vessel disease and explored its performance in comparison with the modified lesion classification system of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology. The SXscore, applied to 1,292 lesions in 306 patients who underwent PCI for 3-vessel disease in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Part II, was 4 to 54.5, and after a median of 370 days (range 274 to 400) predicted the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio 1.08/U increase, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.11, p <0.0001), with patients in the highest SXscore tertile having a significantly higher event rate (27.9%) than patients in the lowest tertile (8.7%, hazard ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 7.4, p = 0.001). By multivariable analyses, SXscore independently predicted outcome with an almost fourfold adjusted increase in the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients with high versus low values based on the discrimination level provided by classification and regression tree analysis. Compared with the modified lesion classification scheme of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology, SXscore showed a greater discrimination ability (c-index 0.58 +/- 0.08 vs 0.67 +/- 0.08, respectively, p <0.001) and a better goodness of fit with the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. In conclusion, the SXscore is a promising tool to risk stratify outcome in patients with extensive coronary artery disease undergoing contemporary PCI.
The American Journal of Cardiology 04/2007; 99(8):1072-81. · 3.37 Impact Factor
-
Keiichi Tsuchida,
Antonio Colombo,
Thierry Lefèvre,
Keith G Oldroyd,
Victor Guetta,
Giulio Guagliumi,
Wolfgang von Scheidt,
Witold Ruzyllo,
Christian W Hamm,
Marco Bressers, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Kristel Wittebols,
Dennis J Donohoe,
Patrick W Serruys
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Little is known about the impact of treating bifurcations on the overall outcome of multivessel coronary artery disease treated with stenting. This analysis was made to investigate the 1 year clinical outcome of the treatment of bifurcation lesions using sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with multivessel disease.
Among a total of 607 patients (2160 lesions) in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study part II (ARTS II), there were 324 patients in whom at least one bifurcation lesion was treated (465 lesions). Patients with bifurcations were compared with those without bifurcations in terms of baseline characteristics and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Patients with 'true' (200 patients) vs. 'partial' bifurcations (124 patients) and usage of a one- (263 patients) vs. two-stent strategy (61 patients) were also evaluated. The bifurcation group was associated with more complex lesion and procedural characteristics than the non-bifurcation group. However, there was no significant difference in 1 year MACCE rates between the bifurcation group and the non-bifurcation group (13.3 vs. 11.0%, P=0.46). MACCE in patients with true bifurcations was 13.0 vs. 13.7% for partial bifurcations (P=0.87) and 14.1 vs. 9.8% for one- vs. two-stent strategy (P=0.53).
In this trial without angiographic follow-up, the presence of bifurcations did not affect 1 year outcomes after SES implantation. The outcomes in true vs. partial bifurcations and using one vs. two stents were similar when the treatment strategies were left to the operator's discretion.
European Heart Journal 03/2007; 28(4):433-42. · 10.48 Impact Factor
-
Marco Valgimigli,
Keith Dawkins,
Carlos Macaya,
Bernard de Bruyne,
Emmanuel Teiger,
Jean Fajadet,
Richardt Gert,
Stefano De Servi,
Angelo Ramondo,
Kristel Wittebols, Hans-Peter Stoll,
Tessa A M Rademaker,
Patrick W Serruys
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We sought to evaluate the impact of unstable coronary artery disease (CAD) on short- and mid-term outcomes in patients with multivessel disease treated by multiple sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) as part of ARTS II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Part II).
The differential safety/efficacy profile of SES when implanted in patients with unstable angina (UA) in comparison with stable angina (SA) undergoing multivessel intervention is largely unknown.
Between February 2003 and November 2003, 607 patients at 45 participating centers were treated; 221 of them (36%) presented with UA.
At 30 days, the cumulative rate of death, myocardial infarction-defined as any creatine kinase (CK)/CK-myocardial band elevation beyond the upper limit of normal-cerebrovascular accident, and repeat revascularization (i.e., major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]) was 19.9% in both groups. Angiographic subacute stent occlusion was documented in 1 (0.5%) and 4 (1%) patients in the UA and SA groups, respectively. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of MACCEs was 27.1% in the UA and 24.9% in the SA group (p = 0.56). Two late occlusions occurred, both in the SA group. After adjustment for baseline and procedural characteristics, the presence of UA was not identified as an independent predictor of MACCE (hazard ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 2.12; p = 0.88). These findings remained consistent after increasing the CK/CK-myocardial band threshold to define periprocedural myocardial infarction up to at least 3 or 5 times the upper limit of normal.
In ARTS II, an unstable clinical presentation did not exert a negative impact on short- and mid-term outcome after SES implantation for multivessel disease. (ARTS II Trial; ; NCT00235170).
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 02/2007; 49(4):431-41. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
Christian Spaulding,
Patrick Henry,
Emmanuel Teiger,
Kevin Beatt,
Ezio Bramucci,
Didier Carrié,
Michel S Slama,
Bela Merkely,
Andrejs Erglis,
Massimo Margheri,
Olivier Varenne,
Ana Cebrian, Hans-Peter Stoll,
David B Snead,
Christoph Bode
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sirolimus-eluting stents reduce rates of restenosis and reintervention, as compared with uncoated stents. Data are limited regarding the safety and efficacy of such stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation.
We performed a single-blind, multicenter, prospectively randomized trial to compare sirolimus-eluting stents with uncoated stents in primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. The trial included 712 patients at 48 medical centers. The primary end point was target-vessel failure at 1 year after the procedure, defined as target-vessel-related death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization. A follow-up angiographic substudy was performed at 8 months among 174 patients from selected centers.
The rate of the primary end point was significantly lower in the sirolimus-stent group than in the uncoated-stent group (7.3% vs. 14.3%, P=0.004). This reduction was driven by a decrease in the rate of target-vessel revascularization (5.6% and 13.4%, respectively; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of death (2.3% and 2.2%, respectively; P=1.00), reinfarction (1.1% and 1.4%, respectively; P=1.00), or stent thrombosis (3.4% and 3.6%, respectively; P=1.00). The degree of neointimal proliferation, as assessed by the mean (+/-SD) in-stent late luminal loss, was significantly lower in the sirolimus-stent group (0.14+/-0.49 mm, vs. 0.83+/-0.52 mm in the uncoated stent group; P<0.001).
Among selected patients with acute myocardial infarction, the use of sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduced the rate of target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00232830 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
New England Journal of Medicine 10/2006; 355(11):1093-104. · 53.30 Impact Factor
