J H F Smith

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, ENG, United Kingdom

Are you J H F Smith?

Claim your profile

Publications (12)19.06 Total impact

  • Article: Factors contributing to false-negative and potential false-negative cytology reports in SurePath™ liquid-based cervical cytology.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: N. Gupta, D. John, N. Dudding, J. Crossley and J. H. F. Smith Factors contributing to false-negative and potential false-negative cytology reports in SurePath™liquid-based cervical cytology Objectives:  The characteristics of false-negative conventional cervical cytology smears have been well documented, but there is limited literature available for liquid-based cytology (LBC), especially SurePath™ samples. We aimed to assess the characteristics of false-negative SurePath LBC samples. Methods:  Over a period of 5 years, an audit of false-negative reports in SurePath cervical cytology was undertaken. In a workload of 183, 112 samples, 481 (0.3%) false negatives were identified using two routes: those detected by routine laboratory internal quality control (rapid pre-screening) (n = 463) and those reported as normal (true false negatives) with concurrent high-grade cervical histology (n = 18). Ninety-five false-negative cases with a subsequent biopsy reported as at least cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2+) were reviewed for a number of different cytomorphological features. Results:  Of 95 samples with subsequent CIN2+, 30.5% predominately contained microbiopsies/hyperchromatic crowded cell groups (HCGs), 27.3% sparse dyskarytotic cells, 4.2% pale cell dyskaryosis, 6.3% small dyskaryotic cells; 3.2% were misinterpreted cells, 8.4% contained other distracting cells, 7.4% were low contrast, 5.3% were unexplained and 7.4% were true negatives. The mean number of microbiopsies/HCGs in that category was 4.6. The mean number of abnormal cells in the sparse dyskaryotic cell category was 13.8. Conclusions:  Microbiopsies/HCGs were the commonest reason for false negatives. They were usually present in sufficient numbers to be detected but interpretation could be problematic. Dispersed single abnormal cells were usually not identified because of their scarcity or the presence of distracters.
    Cytopathology 07/2012; · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: Outcome of SurePath™ cervical samples reported as borderline nuclear change by cytological subtype and high-risk HPV status.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: N. Gupta, N. Dudding, J. Crossley, S.J. Payyappilly and J.H.F. Smith Outcome of SurePath™ cervical samples reported as borderline nuclear changes by cytological subtype and high-risk HPV status Background:  The average borderline rate in cervical cytology samples for English laboratories was 3.8% with the range being 2.0-6.8% at the time of the present study, which was undertaken in order to determine the association between different subtypes of borderline nuclear change (BNC), high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) status. Materials and methods:  Of 68 551 SurePath(TM) cervical samples reported in one laboratory over a period of 2 years, 2335 (3.4%) were reported as BNC. hrHPV status was known in 1112 cases (47.6%). The outcome was known only for women with hrHPV-positive BNC, who were recommended for colposcopy under the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme sentinel site protocol. Women with hrHPV-negative BNC were returned to 3-yearly recall. The cases were subdivided into BNC, high-grade dyskaryosis cannot be excluded (B-HG; 105 cases); BNC with koilocytosis (B-K; 421 cases); BNC with other features of HPV (B-HPV; 160 cases); and BNC, not otherwise specified (B-NOS; 426 cases) and were correlated with the histological outcome where available. Results:  The study population age ranged from 23 to 65 years. Cases that tested positive for hrHPV by Qiagen HCII assay comprised 78.1%, 81.0%, 73.1% and 67.8% of B-HG, B-K, B-HPV and B-NOS categories, respectively. CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) was found in 64.6%, 10.0%, 19.7% and 20.1% of hrHPV-positive cases of B-HG, B-K, B-HPV and B-NOS, respectively, which was significantly higher in the B-HG category (P < 0.001) and lower in the B-K category compared with B-NOS (p < 0.001) and B-HPV (p = 0.006) respectively. CIN3+ comprised 55.6%, 6.3%, 26.3% and 19.1% of biopsies in the same categories, respectively. Conclusions:  Subtyping BNC is useful, especially B-K and B-HG, which, respectively, had the lowest and highest rates of detection of both CIN2+ and CIN3+, confirming that koilocytosis is likely to be associated with transient HPV infection. Women with B-HG should be referred to colposcopy in the absence of HPV triage.
    Cytopathology 04/2012; · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: Cytomorphological features of extra-genital metastases in SurePath™ cervical liquid-based cytology: a series of eight cases.
    N Gupta, N Dudding, J H F Smith
    Cytopathology 01/2012; · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Survey of medical training in cytopathology carried out by the journal Cytopathology.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This report of the Editorial Advisory Board of Cytopathology gives the results of a survey of medical practitioners in cytopathology, which aimed to find out their views on the current situation in undergraduate and postgraduate training in their institutions and countries. The results show that training in cytopathology and histopathology are largely carried out at postgraduate level and tend to be organized nationally rather than locally. Histopathology was regarded as essential for training in cytopathology by 89.5% of respondents and was mandatory according to 83.1%. Mandatory cytopathology sections of histopathology were reported by 67.3% and specific examinations in cytopathology by 55.4%. The main deficiencies in training were due to its variability; there were insufficient numbers of pathologists interested in cytology and a consequent lack of training to a high level of competence. Pathologists without specific training in cytopathology signed out cytology reports according to 54.7% of responses, more often in centres where training was 3-6 months or less duration. Although 92.2% of respondents thought that specialist cytology should not be reported by pathologists without experience in general cytopathology, that practice was reported by 30.9%, more often in centres with small workloads. The survey report recommends that 6-12 months should be dedicated to cytopathology during histopathology training, with optional additional training for those wanting to carry out independent practice in cytopathology. Formal accreditation should be mandatory for independent practice in cytopathology. When necessary, temporary placements to centres of good practice should be available for trainees intending to practise independently in cytopathology. There should be adequate numbers of pathologists trained in cytopathology to a high level of competence; some of their time could be released by training cytotechnologists and trainee pathologists to prescreen cytology slides and assess adequacy of fine-needle aspiration samples when immediate diagnosis was not required. The survey demonstrated a clear need for European and international guidelines for training in cytopathology.
    Cytopathology 06/2010; 21(3):147-56. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: The revised BSCC terminology for abnormal cervical cytology.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The BSCC terminology was originally published in 1986 and although highly successful, requires revision. Through a process of professional consensus and literature review this has been undertaken by the BSCC. The revision takes account of recent developments and improvements in understanding of morphology and disease process and is compatible with other terminologies in use elsewhere, whilst still maintaining a focus on practice in the UK cervical screening programmes.
    Cytopathology 07/2008; 19(3):137-57. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: European guidelines on cervical screening.
    J H F Smith, M S Desai
    Cytopathology 09/2007; 18(4):211-2. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: Psammoma bodies in cervical smears: sifting the grains of sand.
    J H F Smith
    Cytopathology 07/2007; 18(3):140-2. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: P‐11
THE IMPACT OF INTRODUCING LIQUID BASED CYTOLOGY INTO A ROUTINE SCREENING LABORATORY
    L. Gregory, N. Dudding, J. H. F. Smith
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the exception of information from the liquid based cytology (LBC) pilot site there has been limited data to date on the impact of the introduction of SurePath™ LBC in the NHSCSP. We will present data to show the impact on a medium sized laboratory (42 000 requests per annum) over the first phases of rollout. Data from before, during and post conversion, a period of 28 months, shows the following trends: (1) A significant fall in the inadequate rate (2) A slight decrease in the borderline / mild dyskaryosis rate (3) A small increase in the high-grade squamous dyskaryosis reporting rate (4) An increase in both the number and specificity of glandular lesions reported (5) A largely unchanged positive predictive value for high-grade abnormalities (6) A significant increase in laboratory productivity, unrelated to inadequate rate but through increased speed of screening. Although our experience is not directly comparable to the experience of the LBC pilot, our observations may well reflect that we were fortunate to be trained by staff from one of the LBC sites and thereby benefited directly from their experience.
    Cytopathology 08/2006; 17(s1):24 - 24. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: Can the management of mild dyskaryosis be refined?
    J H F Smith
    Cytopathology 01/2006; 16(6):273-6. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study assesses the accuracy of published quantitative and qualitative criteria in the Bethesda System (TBS) for squamous intra-epithelial lesions. Quantitative image analysis was undertaken on illustrations from TBS publications and also from slides in Cytology Training Centre teaching sets. Comparisons were also made with the British Society for Clinical Cytology (BSCC) terminology in cervical cytology, using the illustrations in their terminology publication and amalgamating the results into their proposed new two-tier model. TBS quantitatively defines low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (LSIL) in both conventional and liquid-based cytology (LBC) preparations as showing nuclear enlargement more than x3 the area of a normal intermediate squamous cell nucleus. This study found that the increase in mean nuclear area was limited to only x2 in conventional preparations. In LBC (SurePath preparations, there was only a statistically non-significant x1.2 increase. This study identified a progressive and statistically significant reduction in mean cytoplasmic area from normal intermediate cells to LSIL and then to high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (HSIL) in both conventional and LBC preparations. Furthermore, the most consistent quantitative finding in both conventional and LBC preparations was a statistically significant increase in the mean area and diameter ratios from normal intermediate cells to LSIL and then to HSIL. In all instances this varied from x2 to just below x3. This is in agreement with TBS, which states that the cytoplasmic area in HSIL is decreased leading to a marked increase in nuclear to cytoplasmic (NC) ratio. With the exception of an increase in mean nuclear area in conventional preparations from normal intermediate cells to LSIL, the predominant cause for this increase in NC ratios was a reduction in mean cytoplasmic area. The numerical increase in NC ratio for LSIL identified in this study was greater than implied by the 'slightly increased' statement in TBS. TBS comments that some HSIL cells can have the same degree of nuclear enlargement as in LSIL and that other HSIL cells may have much smaller nuclei than in LSIL. Both of these qualitative comments were supported in this study. The mean diameter NC ratios of 33% and 50% could provide useful diagnostic assistance in the distinction of normal intermediate cells and LSIL and between LSIL and HSIL, respectively. Because of overlapping individual ranges, however, additional diagnostic features such as nuclear morphology must be used in the distinction of normal intermediate cells, LSIL and HSIL. No statistical difference was identified in the mean diameter NC ratios between ASC-US and LSIL in TBS publications. In addition, the proposed new BSCC low and high grades of squamous abnormality were not statistically different from ASC-US/LSIL and HSIL, respectively. This provides support that the proposed BSCC two-tier system of squamous abnormalities is comparable to TBS. This study shows that LBC has variable but major and significant effects on nuclear and cytoplasmic morphology and that quantitative definitions in conventional preparations cannot be automatically extrapolated to LBC methodology. The study shows that some TBS quantitative and qualitative criteria require amendment and that an alternative quantitative approach, such as diameter NC ratio has a more valid scientific evidence base. Furthermore, use of NC ratios avoids the problems associated with the variable changes in nuclear and cytoplasmic areas, occurring between conventional and different commercial LBC preparations. By contrast, classifications based on area comparisons must be tailored to the specific conventional or commercial LBC preparation.
    Cytopathology 09/2005; 16(4):168-78. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the grading of squamous cell dyskaryosis, as the British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 1986, the British Society for Clinical Cytology (BSCC) published quantitative criteria to assist diagnosis in a three-tier grading system of squamous cell dyskaryosis. In dyskaryotic cells, area nuclear to cytoplasmic (NC) ratios below 50%, between 50% and 66% and over 66% were defined as equating with mild, moderate and severe grades respectively. Following the Terminology Conference in 2002, however, the BSCC recommended on their website that the three-tier model should be replaced by a new two-tier system of low- and high-grade squamous abnormalities. The latter broadly equate with the two-grade Bethesda System (TBS) for reporting squamous intraepithelial lesions. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of the BSCC three-tier quantitative definitions, to investigate if they were applicable to liquid-based cytology (LBC) and to see how they related to the proposed new two-tier BSCC system. Quantitative image analysis was undertaken on illustrations from the 1986 BSCC terminology publication and on microscope slides from external quality assessment and Cytology Training Centre teaching sets. Analysis of mean NC ratios showed that mild, moderate and severe dyskaryosis exist as statistically different populations. Overlap of NC ratio ranges, however, limits their practical application in the three-tier model, although interestingly no overlap was noted between mild and severe dyskaryosis. No grade of dyskaryosis had a mean area NC ratio over 50%, indicating that the BSCC quantitative definitions are incorrect. The mean diameter NC ratios for mild, moderate and severe dyskaryosis were found to be 40%, 49% and 66% respectively. Accordingly it is possible that those reporting cervical cytology could be interpreting the BSCC NC ratios as meaning diameter rather than area. Amalgamation of the three-tier results into the proposed two-tier model shows that the resulting mean NC area and diameter ratios identify statistically different low- and high-grade populations. The reduced degree of overlap, however, of NC ratio ranges in the two-tier model implies that NC ratios could have a useful practical role in the separation of the low- and high-grade categories. The two categories were reasonably well separated by mean area and diameter NC ratios of 25% and 50% respectively. A two-tier model combining mild with moderate rather than severe dyskaryosis was found to be a statistically valid alternative but gave rise to NC ratios that would be difficult to use in practice. Except for moderate dyskaryosis, no significant differences were identified between the mean NC ratios of either conventional and LBC preparations or LBC preparations using two different commercial methodologies (SurePath and ThinPrep). Differences, however, were noted in area measurements between SurePath and ThinPrep and this has potential implications for classifications (such as TBS) using area comparisons as their basis. In addition, it was found that the increased NC ratio, associated with higher grades of dyskaryosis is more a consequence of progressive cytoplasmic area reduction rather than nuclear area increase. The similar NC ratios of borderline nuclear changes associated with human papilloma virus and mild dyskaryosis support the BSCC proposal that these can be combined to constitute a low-grade category. This study shows that the BSCC area NC ratio criteria of grading squamous cell dyskaryosis require amendment. In addition, this study supports the new BSCC recommendation of low- and high-grade squamous cell categories. The study proposes Sheffield quantitative criteria to assist the grading of squamous cell abnormalities. Quantitative diameter NC ratio measurements, however, must always be accompanied by detailed assessment of qualitative morphological features and in particular those relating to nuclear chromatin. This is equally relevant to both two- and three-tier models.
    Cytopathology 09/2005; 16(4):179-92. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: Bethesda 2001.
    J H F Smith
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Bethesda system (TBS) for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses was originally developed in 1988 at a National Cancer Institute (NCI) workshop convened to consider the benefits of increased standardization in the diagnostic reports provided by cytology laboratories. It rapidly gained acceptance in laboratory practice in the USA and beyond and three years later the NCI sponsored another workshop to assess the use of TBS in practice and consider areas for improvement. Subsequently an illustrated guide was published.
    Cytopathology 03/2002; 13(1):4-10. · 1.59 Impact Factor

Top Journals

Institutions

  • 2002–2012
    • Royal Hallamshire Hospital
      Sheffield, ENG, United Kingdom
  • 2010
    • Karolinska University Hospital
      Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2008
    • University hospitals, Bristol
      Bristol, ENG, United Kingdom
  • 2005–2006
    • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      Sheffield, ENG, United Kingdom