-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCCA) remains a surgical challenge for which few large Western series have been reported. The aims of this study were to investigate the results of surgical resection for PHCCA and assess how practice has evolved over the past 15 years.
A prospectively maintained database was interrogated to identify all resections. Clinicopathological data were analysed for impact on survival. Subsequently, data for resections carried out during the periods 1994-1998, 1999-2003 and 2004-2008 were compared.
Eighty-three patients underwent resection. Trisectionectomy was required in 67% of resections. Overall survival was 70%, 36% and 20% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Size of tumour, margin (R0) status, lymph node status, distant metastasis, tumour grade, portal vein resection, microscopic direct vascular invasion, T-stage and blood transfusion requirement significantly affected outcome on univariate analysis. Distant metastasis (P = 0.040), percutaneous biliary drainage (P = 0.015) and blood transfusion requirement (P = 0.026) were significant factors on multivariate analysis. Survival outcomes improved and blood transfusion requirement was significantly reduced in the most recent time period.
Blood transfusion requirement and preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage were identified as independent indicators of a poor prognosis following resection of PHCCA. Longterm survival can be achieved following the aggressive surgical resection of this tumour, but the emergence of a clear learning curve in our analyses indicates that these patients should be managed in high-volume centres in order to achieve improved outcomes.
HPB 07/2011; 13(7):483-93. · 1.60 Impact Factor
-
British journal of hospital medicine (London, England: 2005) 04/2011; 72(4):M64. · 0.19 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: There continues to be a growing disparity between the demand for and supply of organs for transplantation. This article reviews the status of current strategies in the UK to tackle the organ donor shortage.
British journal of hospital medicine (London, England: 2005) 03/2010; 71(3):144-7. · 0.19 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: With the worldwide shortage of donors, extra lengths are ongoing to enlarge the donor pool. One means has been a greater use of "expanded criteria donor" (ECD) grafts. A major concern regarding ECD kidneys is poor long-term graft survival. The aims of this study were to determine whether ECD grafts, as defined by the United Network for Organ Sharing, had a negative impact on graft survival and to identify the principle donor and recipient factors that influenced graft survival in our patient cohort.
We analyzed all deceased donor renal transplants in our unit from January 1995 to October 2005, in total 1,053 transplants.
ECD grafts (United Network for Organ Sharing criteria) demonstrated higher rates of delayed graft function and higher early mean creatinine levels. However, there was no significant difference in 5-year graft survival. Multivariate analysis of our patient group identified donor hypertension and ischemic heart disease (IHD) as independent predictors of poor graft survival. Recipient age was significant on univariate but not on multivariate analysis. However, although younger recipients maintained acceptable 5-year graft survival despite donor hypertension, IHD, or a combination of both, these factors significantly reduced graft survival in older recipients.
Although ECD grafts had slightly worse function, 5-year survival was comparable with standard grafts in all recipients. Donor hypertension, IHD, or a combination of both significantly reduced graft survival in older recipients, not evident in younger patients. We discuss the possible factors for improved outcome with ECD grafts in our patients and the implications of our patient analysis.
Transplantation 01/2010; 89(1):88-96. · 4.00 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The impact of postoperative morbidity, and in particular infective complications on long-term outcomes, following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is not widely published.
To evaluate the effect of postoperative complications on disease recurrence and overall survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM.
All patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM from January 1993 and March 2007 were identified, and postoperative complications analyzed. Patients who died of postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery were excluded form the study. Postoperative complications were graded using a validated system of classification. Complications were further classified into infective and noninfective complication groups and the primary end points of the study were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years.
A total of 705 patients underwent hepatic resection in the study period. Median follow-up was 38 months. Operative morbidity and mortality were 28% and 3.6%, respectively. The total number of patients was 197 (28%) with complications, and 508 (72%) without complications. The 5 year DFS and OS for those with and without complications were: 13% versus 26% (P < 0.001) and 24% versus 37% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed inflammatory response to tumor score, blood transfusion, tumor number >8, and postoperative sepsis to be independent factors associated with DFS, and inflammatory response to tumor, tumor number >8, and postoperative sepsis to be independent predictors for OS. Intra-abdominal and respiratory infection but not wound infections were associated with poorer long-term outcomes.
Postoperative complications influence long-term outcomes in hepatic resection for CRLM. Specifically, postoperative sepsis is an independent predictor of disease free and overall survival. Thorough preoperative optimization, meticulous surgical technique and careful management in the postoperative period may reduce the incidence of these complications and influence long-term outcomes.
Annals of surgery 10/2009; 251(1):91-100. · 7.90 Impact Factor
-
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) 03/2009; 144(2):196-7. · 4.32 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2008; 13(1):179; author reply 180. · 2.83 Impact Factor
