-
M H Buch,
D L Boyle,
S Rosengren,
B Saleem, R J Reece,
L A Rhodes,
A Radjenovic,
A English,
H Tang,
G Vratsanos,
P O'Connor,
G S Firestein,
P Emery
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abatacept is the only agent currently approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that targets the co-stimulatory signal required for full T-cell activation. No studies have been conducted on its effect on the synovium, the primary site of pathology. The aim of this study was to determine the synovial effect of abatacept in patients with RA and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) blocking therapy.
This first mechanistic study incorporated both dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy-acquired synovial biopsies before and 16 weeks after therapy, providing tissue for immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR analyses.
Sixteen patients (13 women) were studied; all had previously failed TNFalpha-blocking therapy. Fifteen patients completed the study. Synovial biopsies showed a small reduction in cellular content, which was significant only for B cells. The quantitative PCR showed a reduction in expression for most inflammatory genes (Wald statistic of p<0.01 indicating a significant treatment effect), with particular reduction in IFNgamma of -52% (95% CI -73 to -15, p<0.05); this correlated well with MRI improvements. In addition, favourable changes in the osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B levels were noted. DCE-MRI showed a reduction of 15-40% in MRI parameters.
These results indicate that abatacept reduces the inflammatory status of the synovium without disrupting cellular homeostasis. The reductions in gene expression influence bone positively and suggest a basis for the recently demonstrated radiological improvements that have been seen with abatacept treatment in patients with RA.
Annals of the rheumatic diseases 09/2008; 68(7):1220-7. · 8.11 Impact Factor
-
Barry Bresnihan,
Dominique Baeten,
Gary S Firestein,
Oliver M Fitzgerald,
Danielle M Gerlag,
Jasper J Haringman,
Iain B McInnes, Richard J Reece,
Malcolm D Smith,
Ann-Kristin Ulfgren,
Douglas J Veale,
Paul Peter Tak
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Synovial tissue analysis has considerable potential for future randomized controlled trials (RCT). The synovial membrane is the target tissue in treatment strategies of rheumatoid arthritis and other arthropathies. Effective modulation of synovitis is critical when attempting to control symptoms and signs, to prevent joint damage, and to maintain function. In RCT, the systematic evaluation of changes in synovial tissue after commencing treatment enables identification of an early therapeutic effect, using relatively small numbers of patients. This special interest group is working on establishing the evidence to have this endpoint meet the OMERACT filter criteria.
The Journal of Rheumatology 01/2006; 32(12):2481-4. · 3.69 Impact Factor
-
Arthritis & Rheumatism 01/2003; 48(1):271 - 271. · 7.87 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Serial synovial biopsy samples are increasingly being used for the evaluation of novel therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Most studies have used tissues from knee biopsies, but technical improvements have made serial small joint arthroscopy feasible as well. Theoretically, there could be differences in the features of synovial inflammation between various joints as a result of mechanical factors, differences in innervation, and other factors. We therefore undertook this study to compare the cell infiltrate in paired synovial biopsy samples from inflamed knee joints and paired inflamed small joints of patients with RA.
Nine RA patients with both an inflamed knee joint and an inflamed small joint (wrist or metacarpophalangeal joint) underwent an arthroscopic synovial biopsy of both joints on the same day. Multiple biopsy specimens were collected and stained for macrophages, T cells, plasma cells, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) by immunohistochemistry. Sections were evaluated by digital image analysis.
There were no significant differences in mean cell numbers for all markers investigated in samples from the knee joint compared with samples from the small joints. We detected statistically significant correlations for the numbers of sublining macrophages, T cells, and plasma cells, as well as for IL-6 expression, between the knee joint and the small joints. However, there was no significant correlation between different joints for the numbers of intimal macrophages or fibroblast-like synoviocytes.
The results of this study show that the inflammation in one inflamed joint is generally representative of that in other inflamed joints. Therefore, it is possible to use serial samples from the same joint, selecting either large or small joints, for the evaluation of antirheumatic therapies.
Arthritis & Rheumatism 09/2002; 46(8):2034-8. · 7.87 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Ethical constraints on the conduct of placebo-controlled trials evaluating new therapies for serious chronic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), indicate the need for discerning methods to assess treatment effect in active-controlled clinical trials. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DEMRI) is a sensitive technique for the detection of synovial inflammation in RA. Therefore, this investigation was undertaken to evaluate DEMRI as an efficacy assessment tool for differentiating treatment effect in a randomized, active-controlled trial comparing leflunomide and methotrexate.
Patients with active RA (n = 39) were randomized in a 2-center, prospective, double-blind clinical trial to receive either leflunomide (n = 18) or methotrexate (n = 21) therapy for 4 months. DEMRI scans were obtained at baseline and at 4 months, and the initial rate of enhancement (IRE) and the maximal signal intensity (SI) enhancement (ME) were calculated from the SI curves. Clinical improvement was assessed by conventional outcome measures.
Thirty-four patients (17 treated with leflunomide and 17 with methotrexate) had usable baseline and end point DEMRI scans. Leflunomide treatment was associated with a significantly greater improvement in IRE compared with methotrexate treatment (P < 0.05). Average values of ME indicated reduction of inflammation with both leflunomide and methotrexate. The improvement in clinical signs and symptoms, as measured by traditional assessments, was comparable for both active treatments.
Results of this study validate the sensitivity of DEMRI in detecting inflammatory changes in active RA in response to treatment. Improvement in synovial inflammation as measured by IRE was significantly better with leflunomide than with methotrexate over 4 months of therapy.
Arthritis & Rheumatism 03/2002; 46(2):366-72. · 7.87 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Despite its advantages in diagnosis, treatment and research, the role of arthroscopy in the management of rheumatic diseases has diminished due to the development of other less invasive means of joint assessment including advances in imaging techniques, e.g. ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. However, arthroscopy still provides invaluable information. By direct and precise internal inspection of a joint, arthroscopy allows the collection of synovial membrane samples (biopsies) of excellent quality, notably from the most representative pathological areas. Arthroscopy may also play a therapeutic role in the management of inflammatory arthritis (IA) by providing pain relief (lavage). Here we describe the procedure of knee arthroscopy under local anaesthesia, as well as an in situ visual assessment of synovial inflammation and its correlation with degree of histological and immunological abnormalities. With the emphasis being placed on early diagnosis and treatment initiation in patients with IA and as earlier initiation of targeted biologic therapies becomes more commonplace, the ability to predict which patients will respond to the different therapies available would be invaluable. Assessment of arthroscopic derived synovial biopsies has potential to play an important role in management of early IA in the future.
Clinical and experimental rheumatology 30(3):429-35. · 2.15 Impact Factor
