-
Jason E Faris,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky,
Shaunagh McDermott,
Alexander R Guimaraes,
Jackie Szymonifka,
Mai Anh Huynh,
Cristina R Ferrone,
Jennifer A Wargo,
Jill N Allen,
Lauren E Dias, [......],
Keith D Lillemoe,
Sarah P Thayer,
Janet E Murphy,
Andrew X Zhu,
Dushyant V Sahani,
Jennifer Y Wo,
Jeffrey W Clark,
Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo,
David P Ryan,
Theodore S Hong
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of our retrospective institutional experience is to report the overall response rate, R0 resection rate, progression-free survival, and safety/toxicity of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin) and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients with LAPC treated with FOLFIRINOX were identified via the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center pharmacy database. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and safety/tolerability data were compiled. Formal radiographic review was performed to determine overall response rates (ORRs). Twenty-two patients with LAPC began treatment with FOLFIRINOX between July 2010 and February 2012. The ORR was 27.3%, and the median progression-free survival was 11.7 months. Five of 22 patients were able to undergo R0 resections following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation. Three of the five patients have experienced distant recurrence within 5 months. Thirty-two percent of patients required at least one emergency department visit or hospitalization while being treated with FOLFIRINOX. FOLFIRINOX possesses substantial activity in patients with LAPC. The use of FOLFIRINOX was associated with conversion to resectability in >20% of patients. However, the recurrences following R0 resection in three of five patients and the toxicities observed with the use of this regimen raise important questions about how to best treat patients with LAPC.
The Oncologist 05/2013; · 3.91 Impact Factor
-
Brian M Wolpin,
Kimmie Ng,
Andrew X Zhu,
Thomas Abrams,
Peter C Enzinger,
Nadine J McCleary,
Deborah Schrag, Eunice L Kwak,
Jill N Allen,
Pankaj Bhargava, Jennifer A Chan,
Wolfram Goessling,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky,
Jeffrey G Supko,
Meaghan Elliot,
Kaori Sato,
Eileen Regan,
Jeffrey A Meyerhardt,
Charles S Fuchs
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Treatments that target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway have efficacy in colorectal cancer. We evaluated tolerability and efficacy of tivozanib (an oral VEGF receptor-1, -2, -3 inhibitor) plus everolimus (an oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor). METHODS: The phase Ib study followed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with three dose levels. The primary objective in the follow-on phase II study was improvement in 2-month progression-free survival (PFS) from 30% (historical benchmark) to 50% in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities in the phase Ib study were grade 3 fatigue and dehydration. Oral tivozanib (1 mg daily for 3 of 4 weeks) and oral everolimus (10 mg daily continuously) were advanced to a 40-patient phase II study. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia and hypophosphatemia. The 2-month PFS rate was 50%, with 20 of 40 patients having stable disease (SD). Seven (18%) patients were treated for ≥6 months. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 3.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-3.6 months) and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4-10.6 months), respectively. Patients who developed grade 1+ hypertension had increased SD rates (65.2% vs. 29.4%) and longer OS times (10.6 vs. 3.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: The oral combination of tivozanib and everolimus was well tolerated, with stable disease achieved in 50% of patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer.
The Oncologist 04/2013; · 3.91 Impact Factor
-
Michael S Lee,
Harvey J Mamon,
Theodore S Hong,
Noah C Choi,
Panagiotis M Fidias, Eunice L Kwak,
Jeffrey A Meyerhardt,
David P Ryan,
Raphael Bueno,
Dean M Donahue,
Michael T Jaklitsch,
Michael Lanuti,
David W Rattner,
Charles S Fuchs,
Peter C Enzinger
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Purpose. To determine the efficacy and toxicity of weekly neoadjuvant cetuximab combined with irinotecan, cisplatin, and radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.Methods and Materials. Patients with stage IIA-IVA esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were enrolled in a Simon's two-stage phase II study. Patients received weekly cetuximab on weeks 0-8 and irinotecan and cisplatin on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5, with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy on weeks 1-6), followed by surgical resection.Results. In the first stage, 17 patients were enrolled, 16 of whom had adenocarcinoma. Because of a low pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in this cohort, the trial was discontinued for patients with adenocarcinoma but squamous cell carcinoma patients continued to be enrolled; two additional patients were enrolled before the study was closed as a result of poor accrual. Of the 19 patients enrolled, 18 patients proceeded to surgery and 16 patients underwent an R0 resection. Three patients (16%) had a pCR. The median progression-free survival interval was 10 months and the median overall survival duration was 31 months. Severe neutropenia occurred in 47% of patients, and severe diarrhea occurred in 47% of patients. One patient died preoperatively from sepsis, and one patient died prior to hospital discharge following surgical resection.Conclusions. This schedule of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan, cisplatin, and radiation therapy was toxic and did not achieve a sufficient pCR rate in patients with localized esophageal adenocarcinoma to undergo further evaluation.
The Oncologist 02/2013; · 3.91 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Targeted therapies have been studied in combination with chemoradiation therapy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. To date, the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) HER2, epidermal growth factor receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways have been most extensively studied in esophagogastric cancers. However, despite strong preclinical rationale and evidence of activity in other diseases, the efficacy of these agents has been mixed when studied in the metastatic setting or in combination with chemoradiation. In this review, the history of the development of targeted therapies in esophagogastric cancers is reviewed, with a specific focus on the incorporation of these agents with chemoradiation. Additionally, more recently identified targets of interest in esophagogastric cancers, including c-MET, heat shock protein 90, and Sonic hedgehog, are discussed in the context of chemoradiation.
Seminars in radiation oncology 01/2013; 23(1):31-7. · 4.32 Impact Factor
-
Ioannis T Konstantinidis,
Andrew L Warshaw,
Jill N Allen,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky,
Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo,
Vikram Deshpande,
Theodore S Hong, Eunice L Kwak,
Gregory Y Lauwers,
David P Ryan,
Jennifer A Wargo,
Keith D Lillemoe,
Cristina R Ferrone
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:: Patients who undergo an R0 resection of their pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have an improved survival compared with patients who undergo an R1 resection. It is unclear whether an R1 resection confers a survival benefit over locally advanced (LA) unresectable tumors. Our aim was to compare the survival of patients undergoing an R1 resection with those having LA tumors and to explore the prognostic significance of a 1-mm surgical margin. METHODS:: Clinicopathologic data from a pancreatic cancer database between January 1993 and July 2008 were reviewed. Locally advanced tumors had no evidence of metastatic disease at exploration. RESULTS:: A total of 1705 patients were evaluated for PDAC in the Department of Surgery. Of the 1084 (64%) patients who were surgically explored, 530 (49%) were considered unresectable (286 locally unresectable, 244 with distant metastasis). One hundred fifty-seven (28%) of the resected PDACs had an R1 resection. Patients undergoing an R1 resection had a slightly longer survival compared with those who had locally advanced unresectable cancers (14 vs 11 months; P < 0.001). Patients with R0 resections had a favorable survival compared with those with R1 resections (23 vs 14 months; P < 0.001), but survival after resections with 1-mm margin or less (R0-close) were similar to R1 resections: both groups had a significantly shorter median survival than patients with a margin of greater than 1 mm (R0-wide) (16 vs 14 vs 35 months, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:: Patients undergoing an R1 resection still have an improved survival compared with patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. R0 resections have an improved survival compared with R1 resections, but this survival benefit is lost when the tumor is within 1 mm of the resection margin.
Annals of surgery 09/2012; · 7.90 Impact Factor
-
D Ross Camidge,
Yung-Jue Bang, Eunice L Kwak,
A John Iafrate,
Marileila Varella-Garcia,
Stephen B Fox,
Gregory J Riely,
Benjamin Solomon,
Sai-Hong I Ou,
Dong-Wan Kim, [......],
Pasi A Jänne,
Daniel B Costa,
Geoffrey I Shapiro,
Patricia Lorusso,
Katherine Ruffner,
Patricia Stephenson,
Yiyun Tang,
Keith Wilner,
Jeffrey W Clark,
Alice T Shaw
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: ALK fusion genes occur in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). We assessed the tolerability and activity of crizotinib in patients with NSCLC who were prospectively identified to have an ALK fusion within the first-in-man phase 1 crizotinib study.
In this phase 1 study, patients with ALK-positive stage III or IV NSCLC received oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. Endpoints included tumour responses, duration of response, time to tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival at 6 and 12 months, and determination of the safety and tolerability and characterisation of the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of crizotinib after oral administration. Responses were analysed in evaluable patients and PFS and safety were analysed in all patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00585195.
Between Aug 27, 2008, and June 1, 2011, 149 ALK-positive patients were enrolled, 143 of whom were included in the response-evaluable population. 87 of 143 patients had an objective response (60·8%, 95% CI 52·3-68·9), including three complete responses and 84 partial responses. Median time to first documented objective response was 7·9 weeks (range 2·1-39·6) and median duration of response was 49·1 weeks (95% CI 39·3-75·4). The response rate seemed to be largely independent of age, sex, performance status, or line of treatment. Median PFS was 9·7 months (95% CI 7·7-12·8). Median overall survival data are not yet mature, but estimated overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 87·9% (95% CI 81·3-92·3) and 74·8% (66·4-81·5), respectively. 39 patients continued to receive crizotinib for more than 2 weeks after progression because of perceived ongoing clinical benefit from the drug (12 for at least 6 months from the time of their initial investigator-defined disease progression). Overall, 144 (97%) of 149 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were mostly grade 1 or 2. The most common adverse events were visual effects, nausea, diarrhoea, constipation, vomiting, and peripheral oedema. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (n=9), raised alanine aminotransferase (n=6), hypophosphataemia (n=6), and lymphopenia (n=6).
Crizotinib is well tolerated with rapid, durable responses in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. There seems to be potential for ongoing benefit after initial disease progression in this population, but a more formal definition of ongoing benefit in this context is needed.
Pfizer.
The lancet oncology 09/2012; 13(10):1011-9. · 14.47 Impact Factor
-
Nils D Arvold,
Christopher G Willett,
Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo,
David P Ryan,
Cristina R Ferrone,
Jeffrey W Clark,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky,
Vikram Deshpande,
Andrzej Niemierko,
Jill N Allen, Eunice L Kwak,
Raymond C Wadlow,
Andrew X Zhu,
Andrew L Warshaw,
Theodore S Hong
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) are rare neoplasms associated with poor outcomes without resection, and involved surgical margins are associated with a worse prognosis. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in these patients has not been characterized.
We retrospectively evaluated 46 consecutive patients with positive or close (<1 mm) margins after pNET resection, treated from 1983 to 2010, 16 of whom received adjuvant RT. Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions; half the patients received concurrent chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. No patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Cox multivariate analysis (MVA) was used to analyze factors associated with overall survival (OS).
Median age at diagnosis was 56 years, and 52% of patients were female. Median tumor size was 38 mm, 57% of patients were node-positive, and 11% had a resected solitary liver metastasis. Patients who received RT were more likely to have larger tumors (median, 54 mm vs. 30 mm, respectively, p = 0.002) and node positivity (81% vs. 33%, respectively, p = 0.002) than those not receiving RT. Median follow-up was 39 months. Actuarial 5-year OS was 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-77%). In the group that did not receive RT, 3 patients (10%) experienced local recurrence (LR) and 5 patients (18%) developed new distant metastases, while in the RT group, 1 patient (6%) experienced LR and 5 patients (38%) developed distant metastases. Of all recurrences, 29% were LR. On MVA, male gender (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 3.81; 95% CI, 1.21-11.92; p = 0.02) and increasing tumor size (AHR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; p = 0.007) were associated with decreased OS.
Long-term survival is common among patients with involved-margin pNET. Despite significantly worse pathologic features among patients receiving adjuvant RT, rates of LR between groups were similar, suggesting that RT might aid local control, and merits further evaluation.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 03/2012; 83(3):e337-43. · 4.59 Impact Factor
-
Kristin Bergethon,
Alice T Shaw,
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou,
Ryohei Katayama,
Christine M Lovly,
Nerina T McDonald,
Pierre P Massion,
Christina Siwak-Tapp,
Adriana Gonzalez,
Rong Fang, [......],
Haiquan Chen,
Keith D Wilner, Eunice L Kwak,
Jeffrey W Clark,
David P Carbone,
Hongbin Ji,
Jeffrey A Engelman,
Mari Mino-Kenudson,
William Pao,
A John Iafrate
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chromosomal rearrangements involving the ROS1 receptor tyrosine kinase gene have recently been described in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Because little is known about these tumors, we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with NSCLC with ROS1 rearrangement.
Using a ROS1 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, we screened 1,073 patients with NSCLC and correlated ROS1 rearrangement status with clinical characteristics, overall survival, and when available, ALK rearrangement status. In vitro studies assessed the responsiveness of cells with ROS1 rearrangement to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib. The clinical response of one patient with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC to crizotinib was investigated as part of an expanded phase I cohort.
Of 1,073 tumors screened, 18 (1.7%) were ROS1 rearranged by FISH, and 31 (2.9%) were ALK rearranged. Compared with the ROS1-negative group, patients with ROS1 rearrangements were significantly younger and more likely to be never-smokers (each P < .001). All of the ROS1-positive tumors were adenocarcinomas, with a tendency toward higher grade. ROS1-positive and -negative groups showed no difference in overall survival. The HCC78 ROS1-rearranged NSCLC cell line and 293 cells transfected with CD74-ROS1 showed evidence of sensitivity to crizotinib. The patient treated with crizotinib showed tumor shrinkage, with a near complete response.
ROS1 rearrangement defines a molecular subset of NSCLC with distinct clinical characteristics that are similar to those observed in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Crizotinib shows in vitro activity and early evidence of clinical activity in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 01/2012; 30(8):863-70. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Raymond C Wadlow,
Aram F Hezel,
Thomas A Abrams,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky,
Charles S Fuchs,
Matthew H Kulke, Eunice L Kwak,
Jeffrey A Meyerhardt,
David P Ryan,
Jackie Szymonifka,
Brian M Wolpin,
Andrew X Zhu,
Jeffrey W Clark
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background Cetuximab and panitumumab are monoclonal antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and are approved for the treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. There are no data that describe the activity of panitumumab in patients with progressive disease on cetuximab. We performed a single-arm phase II trial of panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer that had progressed on prior cetuximab. Methods We used a two-stage study design to treat patients with panitumumab at 6 mg/kg every 14 days (cycle length = 28 days). Treatment was continued until disease progression, death, inability to tolerate panitumumab, or study withdrawal. The primary endpoint was response rate; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. Twenty patients were treated in the first stage, with plans to treat an additional twelve patients if there was at least one objective response. We collected blood samples at baseline and prior to cycles 2 and 3 to evaluate for the presence of anti-cetuximab and anti-panitumumab antibodies. Results We treated twenty patients for a median of two cycles (range 1-4). No patients responded, and 45% had a best response of stable disease (no progression for at least two cycles). Median progression-free survival was 1.7 months and median overall survival was 5.2 months. Panitumumab was well tolerated. Thirteen patients (65%) had grade 1-2 dry skin or rash, and three patients had treatment-related grade 3 toxicities (one each with hyperglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and hypokalemia). No patients had detectable anti-cetuximab antibodies at any time point; one patient developed anti-panitumumab antibodies. Conclusions Panitumumab has minimal benefit in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed on prior cetuximab. Discussion Both cetuximab and panitumumab competitively inhibit ligand binding to EGFR, thereby promoting receptor internalization and blocking receptor-mediated signaling. Although the two agents have never been compared directly in a randomized clinical trial, they produce similar response rates when used alone as well as in combination with cytotoxic agents. Cetuximab is a chimeric antibody with approximately 30% murine protein, while panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody. Correspondingly, rates of severe hypersensitivity reactions are somewhat increased with cetuximab (3%) compared to panitumumab (1%). However, the potential efficacy of panitumumab in patients who have developed disease progression on cetuximab has been an open question. Metges et al. (PANERB trial) prospectively treated 32 KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients with cetuximab and irinotecan followed by panitumumab monotherapy after progression. Remarkably, the authors reported an objective response rate of 22% to panitumumab, including a disease control rate (objective response plus stable disease) of 73% in 11 patients who had previously responded to cetuximab and irinotecan. In contrast, we found no responders and a stable disease rate of 45% with a median duration of only 1.7 months in our trial of 20 patients. Moreover, no patients had detectable anti-cetuximab antibodies at baseline. It is not clear to what extent the PANERB trial included patients without objective disease progression on cetuximab or for whom cetuximab-containing regimens may have been ceased due to toxicity in the absence of disease progression. In both circumstances, retreatment with panitumumab may be expected to demonstrate some degree of clinical activity. In our study, disease progression after at least 4 weeks of cetuximab documented radiographically or by increased carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels was required for inclusion in order to ensure that the study population demonstrated unequivocal evidence of progression on cetuximab. While it remains possible that a small subset of patients may benefit from panitumumab after progression on cetuximab, our results suggest that this approach should not be adopted until predictive biomarkers for panitumumab response in this setting have been discovered and validated. Until then, patients who develop progression on cetuximab should be enrolled in trials of novel agents.
The Oncologist 01/2012; 17(1):14-e35. · 3.91 Impact Factor
-
Jochen K Lennerz, Eunice L Kwak,
Allison Ackerman,
Michael Michael,
Stephen B Fox,
Kristin Bergethon,
Gregory Y Lauwers,
James G Christensen,
Keith D Wilner,
Daniel A Haber,
Ravi Salgia,
Yung-Jue Bang,
Jeffrey W Clark,
Benjamin J Solomon,
A John Iafrate
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Amplification of the MET proto-oncogene in gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) may constitute a molecular marker for targeted therapy. We examined a GEC cohort with follow-up and reported the clinical response of four additional patients with MET-amplified tumors to the small molecule inhibitor crizotinib as part of an expanded phase I cohort study.
From 2007 to 2009, patients with GEC were genetically screened as a consecutive series of 489 tumors (stages 0, I, and II, 39%; III, 25%; IV, 36%; n = 222 esophageal, including n = 21 squamous carcinomas). MET, EGFR, and HER2 amplification status was assessed by using fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Ten (2%) of 489 patients screened harbored MET amplification; 23 (4.7%) harbored EGFR amplification; 45 (8.9%) harbored HER2 amplification; and 411 (84%) were wild type for all three genes (ie, negative). MET-amplified tumors were typically high-grade adenocarcinomas that presented at advanced stages (5%; n = 4 of 80). EGFR-amplified tumors showed the highest fraction of squamous cell carcinoma (17%; n = 4 of 23). HER2, MET, and EGFR amplification were, with one exception (MET and EGFR positive), mutually exclusive events. Survival analysis in patients with stages III and IV disease showed substantially shorter median survival in MET/EGFR-amplified groups, with a rank order for all groups by median survival (from most to least aggressive): MET (7.1 months; P < .001) less than EGFR (11.2 months; P = .16) less than HER2 (16.9 months; P = .89) when compared with the negative group (16.2 months). Two of four patients with MET-amplified tumors treated with crizotinib experienced tumor shrinkage (-30% and -16%) and experienced progression after 3.7 and 3.5 months.
MET amplification defines a small and aggressive subset of GEC with indications of transient sensitivity to the targeted MET inhibitor crizotinib (PF-02341066).
Journal of Clinical Oncology 12/2011; 29(36):4803-10. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Darrell R Borger,
Kenneth K Tanabe,
Kenneth C Fan,
Hector U Lopez,
Valeria R Fantin,
Kimberly S Straley,
David P Schenkein,
Aram F Hezel,
Marek Ancukiewicz,
Hannah M Liebman, Eunice L Kwak,
Jeffrey W Clark,
David P Ryan,
Vikram Deshpande,
Dora Dias-Santagata,
Leif W Ellisen,
Andrew X Zhu,
A John Iafrate
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cancers of origin in the gallbladder and bile ducts are rarely curable with current modalities of cancer treatment. Our clinical application of broad-based mutational profiling for patients diagnosed with a gastrointestinal malignancy has led to the novel discovery of mutations in the gene encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) in tumors from a subset of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. A total of 287 tumors from gastrointestinal cancer patients (biliary tract, colorectal, gastroesophageal, liver, pancreatic, and small intestine carcinoma) were tested during routine clinical evaluation for 130 site-specific mutations within 15 cancer genes. Mutations were identified within a number of genes, including KRAS (35%), TP53 (22%), PIK3CA (10%), BRAF (7%), APC (6%), NRAS (3%), AKT1 (1%), CTNNB1 (1%), and PTEN (1%). Although mutations in the metabolic enzyme IDH1 were rare in the other common gastrointestinal malignancies in this series (2%), they were found in three tumors (25%) of an initial series of 12 biliary tract carcinomas. To better define IDH1 and IDH2 mutational status, an additional 75 gallbladder and bile duct cancers were examined. Combining these cohorts of biliary cancers, mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 were found only in cholangiocarcinomas of intrahepatic origin (nine of 40, 23%) and in none of the 22 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and none of the 25 gallbladder carcinomas. In an analysis of frozen tissue specimens, IDH1 mutation was associated with highly elevated tissue levels of the enzymatic product 2-hydroxyglutarate. Thus, IDH1 mutation is a molecular feature of cholangiocarcinomas of intrahepatic origin. These findings define a specific metabolic abnormality in this largely incurable type of gastrointestinal cancer and present a potentially new target for therapy.
The Oncologist 12/2011; 17(1):72-9. · 3.91 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Clinical Oncology 12/2011; 30(3):e30-3. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Nils D Arvold,
David P Ryan,
Andrzej Niemierko,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky, Eunice L Kwak,
Jennifer Y Wo,
Jill N Allen,
Jeffrey W Clark,
Raymond C Wadlow,
Andrew X Zhu,
Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo,
Theodore S Hong
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before chemoradiation therapy (CRT) may improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but optimal management remains controversial, and prior reports have limited follow-up.
Seventy consecutive patients with unresectable (n = 46) or borderline resectable (n = 24) locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with CRT from 2005 to 2009. Patients typically received 50.4 grays in 28 fractions (91%) with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (84%) or capecitabine (14%). Forty patients received CRT alone, and 30 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRT for a median of 4 months, typically gemcitabine (93%). All patients without progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were offered CRT.
Median follow-up was 14.2 months (range, 3-57 months). Fifty-three percent of patients in the CRT group versus 83% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRT group had unresectable tumors at diagnosis; after completion of CRT, 20% of patients in both groups underwent resection. Compared with CRT alone, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRT group demonstrated improved median overall survival (OS; 18.7 vs 12.4 months; P = .02) and progression-free survival (11.4 vs 6.7 months; P = .02). On multivariate analysis, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87; P = .02) and surgical resection (adjusted HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.85; P = .02) were associated with increased OS.
Gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy confers a significant OS advantage by allowing the selection of patients who will derive greatest benefit from CRT. Median survival with this approach was similar to that seen with surgical resection.
Cancer 10/2011; 118(12):3026-35. · 4.77 Impact Factor
-
Alice T Shaw,
Beow Y Yeap,
Benjamin J Solomon,
Gregory J Riely,
Justin Gainor,
Jeffrey A Engelman,
Geoffrey I Shapiro,
Daniel B Costa,
Sai-Hong I Ou,
Mohit Butaney, [......],
Robert C Doebele,
Yung-Jue Bang,
Kimary Kulig,
Paulina Selaru,
Yiyun Tang,
Keith D Wilner, Eunice L Kwak,
Jeffrey W Clark,
A John Iafrate,
D Ross Camidge
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: ALK gene rearrangement defines a new molecular subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a recent phase 1 clinical trial, the ALK tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib showed marked antitumour activity in patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC. To assess whether crizotinib affects overall survival in these patients, we did a retrospective study comparing survival outcomes in crizotinib-treated patients in the trial and crizotinib-naive controls screened during the same time period.
We examined overall survival in patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC who enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial of crizotinib, focusing on the cohort of 82 patients who had enrolled through Feb 10, 2010. For comparators, we identified 36 ALK-positive patients from trial sites who were not given crizotinib (ALK-positive controls), 67 patients without ALK rearrangement but positive for EGFR mutation, and 253 wild-type patients lacking either ALK rearrangement or EGFR mutation. To assess differences in overall survival, we assessed subsets of clinically comparable ALK-positive and ALK-negative patients.
Among 82 ALK-positive patients who were given crizotinib, median overall survival from initiation of crizotinib has not been reached (95% CI 17 months to not reached); 1-year overall survival was 74% (95% CI 63-82), and 2-year overall survival was 54% (40-66). Overall survival did not differ based on age, sex, smoking history, or ethnic origin. Survival in 30 ALK-positive patients who were given crizotinib in the second-line or third-line setting was significantly longer than in 23 ALK-positive controls given any second-line therapy (median overall survival not reached [95% CI 14 months to not reached] vs 6 months [4-17], 1-year overall survival 70% [95% CI 50-83] vs 44% [23-64], and 2-year overall survival 55% [33-72] vs 12% [2-30]; hazard ratio 0·36, 95% CI 0·17-0·75; p=0·004). Survival in 56 crizotinib-treated, ALK-positive patients was similar to that in 63 ALK-negative, EGFR-positive patients given EGFR TKI therapy (median overall survival not reached [95% CI 17 months to not reached] vs 24 months [15-34], 1-year overall survival 71% [95% CI 58-81] vs 74% [61-83], and 2-year overall survival 57% [40-71] vs 52% [38-65]; p=0·786), whereas survival in 36 crizotinib-naive, ALK-positive controls was similar to that in 253 wild-type controls (median overall survival 20 months [95% CI 13-26] vs 15 months [13-17]; p=0·244).
In patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC, crizotinib therapy is associated with improved survival compared with that of crizotinib-naive controls. ALK rearrangement is not a favourable prognostic factor in advanced NSCLC.
Pfizer Inc, V Foundation for Cancer Research.
The lancet oncology 09/2011; 12(11):1004-12. · 14.47 Impact Factor
-
Jason E Faris,
Jamie Arnott,
Hui Zheng,
David P Ryan,
Thomas A Abrams,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky,
Jeffrey W Clark,
Peter C Enzinger,
Aram F Hezel,
Kimmie Ng,
Brian M Wolpin, Eunice L Kwak
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: MKC-1 is an orally available cell cycle inhibitor with downstream targets that include tubulin and the importin-β family. We conducted an open-label Phase II study with MKC-1 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer, performance status of 1 or better, and failure of at least one prior regimen of chemotherapy. MKC-1 was administered orally, twice daily, initially at 100 mg/m(2) dosing for 14 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle. This schedule was modified during the trial to fixed and continuous dosing of 150 mg per day.
20 of an original target of 33 patients were accrued, with a median age of 61 (range 44-81). No objective responses were observed, with one patient demonstrating stable disease. Overall survival was 101 days from the start of MKC-1 administration, and median time to progression was 42 days. The most common adverse events listed as related or possibly related to MKC-1 administration were hematologic toxicities and fatigue. One patient developed grade 5 (fatal) pancytopenia. Grade 3 and 4 events included cytopenias (lymphopenia, anemia), hyperbilirubinemia, pneumonia, mucositis, fatigue, infusion reaction, anorexia, and hypoalbuminemia.
MKC-1 administration was associated with substantial toxicity and did not demonstrate sufficient activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer to justify further exploration in this patient population.
Investigational New Drugs 07/2011; 30(4):1614-20. · 3.36 Impact Factor
-
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Eunice L Kwak,
Christina Siwak-Tapp,
Joni Dy,
Kristin Bergethon,
Jeffrey W Clark,
D Ross Camidge,
Benjamin J Solomon,
Robert G Maki,
Yung-Jue Bang,
Dong-Wan Kim,
James Christensen,
Weiwei Tan,
Keith D Wilner,
Ravi Salgia,
A John Iafrate
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Crizotinib is a dual MET and ALK inhibitor. Currently, clinical development of crizotinib is focused primarily on ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we report an NSCLC patient with de novo MET amplification but no ALK rearrangement who achieved a rapid and durable response to crizotinib indicating is also a bona fide MET inhibitor.
Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 05/2011; 6(5):942-6. · 4.55 Impact Factor
-
Andrew X Zhu,
Thomas A Abrams,
Rebecca Miksad,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky,
Jeffrey A Meyerhardt,
Hui Zheng,
Alona Muzikansky,
Jeffrey W Clark, Eunice L Kwak,
Deborah Schrag,
Kathryn R Jors,
Charles S Fuchs,
A John Iafrate,
Darrell R Borger,
David P Ryan
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a single-arm, phase 1/2 study of everolimus in patients with advanced HCC.
Patients with histologically confirmed measurable advanced HCC, 0-2 prior regimens, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received everolimus at 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day orally (6 weeks/cycle). The primary end points were determination of a safe dosage of everolimus (phase 1) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 weeks (phase 2).
Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at the 5 mg/day (n = 3) or 10 mg/day (n = 6) dosage level in phase 1. Twenty-five patients received everolimus at 10 mg/day. Grade 3-4 adverse events included lymphopenia (n = 3), aspartate transaminase (n = 3), hyponatremia (n = 2), and 1 patient each with anemia, alanine transaminase, hyperglycemia, proteinuria, rash, and hypoxia. One patient (4%) had partial response (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9%-19.6%). The median PFS and overall survival were 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.1-4.6) and 8.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-21.1), respectively. The estimated PFS rate at 24 weeks was 28.6% (95% CI, 7.9%-49.3%).
Everolimus was well tolerated in patients with advanced HCC, and 10 mg/day was defined as the phase 2 dosage. Although the study did not proceed to the second stage of phase 2, preliminary antitumor activity was observed with everolimus in patients with advanced HCC, most of whom had prior systemic treatment.
Cancer 04/2011; 117(22):5094-102. · 4.77 Impact Factor
-
Jennifer R Diamond,
Bruno R Bastos,
Ryan J Hansen,
Daniel L Gustafson,
S Gail Eckhardt, Eunice L Kwak,
Shuchi S Pandya,
Graham C Fletcher,
Todd M Pitts,
Gillian N Kulikowski,
Mark Morrow,
Jamie Arnott,
Mark R Bray,
Carolyn Sidor,
Wells Messersmith,
Geoffrey I Shapiro
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: ENMD-2076 is a unique orally bioavailable Aurora kinase and VEGFR inhibitor. The purpose of this phase 1 study of ENMD-2076 was to determine the MTD, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles and preliminary antitumor activity.
Patients with refractory advanced solid malignancies were treated with ENMD-2076 orally with continuous once daily dosing. Doses from 60 to 200 mg/m(2) were evaluated using a standard 3 (to 4) + 3 design. Pharmacokinetic parameters were studied on days 1, 28, and 30 to 35 of cycle 1. Expanded MTD cohorts included patients with ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and refractory solid tumors.
A total of 67 patients (46 F, 21M; ages 30-76) entered the study. Dose levels of 60, 80, 120, 200, and 160 mg/m(2) were evaluated. Two patients experienced grade 3 hypertension at 200 mg/m(2), and additional grade 3 neutropenia events limited tolerability at this dose. An intermediate dose of 160 mg/m(2) was determined to be the MTD. The most common drug-related adverse events included hypertension, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue. The pharmacokinetics of ENMD-2076 were characterized by a rapid absorption phase (T(max) 3-7.8 hours), a t(1/2) of 27.3 to 38.3 hours after a single dose, and dose proportional exposure. Decreased plasma sVEGFR2 was observed posttreatment. Two patients with platinum refractory/resistant ovarian cancer had RECIST partial responses.
ENMD-2076 was well tolerated, had a linear pharmacokinetic profile, and showed promising antitumor activity, particularly in ovarian cancer. The recommended phase 2 dose of ENMD-2076 is 160 mg/m(2) administered orally once daily with continuous dosing.
Clinical Cancer Research 02/2011; 17(4):849-60. · 7.74 Impact Factor
-
Theodore S Hong,
David P Ryan,
Lawrence S Blaszkowsky,
Harvey J Mamon, Eunice L Kwak,
Mari Mino-Kenudson,
Judith Adams,
Beow Yeap,
Barbara Winrich,
Thomas F DeLaney,
Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the safety of 1 week of chemoradiation with proton beam therapy and capecitabine followed by early surgery.
Fifteen patients with localized resectable, pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the head were enrolled from May 2006 to September 2008. Patients received radiation with proton beam. In dose level 1, patients received 3 GyE × 10 (Week 1, Monday-Friday; Week 2, Monday-Friday). Patients in Dose Levels 2 to 4 received 5 GyE × 5 in progressively shortened schedules: level 2 (Week 1, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; Week 2, Tuesday and Thursday), Level 3 (Week 1, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday; Week 2, Monday), Level 4 (Week 1, Monday through Friday). Capecitabine was given as 825 mg/m(2) b.i.d. Weeks 1 and 2 Monday through Friday for a total of 10 days in all dose levels. Surgery was performed 4 to 6 weeks after completion of chemotherapy for Dose Levels 1 to 3 and then after 1 to 3 weeks for Dose Level 4.
Three patients were treated at Dose Levels 1 to 3 and 6 patients at Dose Level 4, which was selected as the MTD. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Grade 3 toxicity was noted in 4 patients (pain in 1; stent obstruction or infection in 3). Eleven patients underwent resection. Reasons for no resection were metastatic disease (3 patients) and unresectable tumor (1 patient). Mean postsurgical length of stay was 6 days (range, 5-10 days). No unexpected 30-day postoperative complications, including leak or obstruction, were found.
Preoperative chemoradiation with 1 week of proton beam therapy and capecitabine followed by early surgery is feasible. A Phase II study is underway.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 01/2011; 79(1):151-7. · 4.59 Impact Factor
-
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou,
Lyudmila Bazhenova,
D Ross Camidge,
Benjamin J Solomon,
June Herman,
Tatiana Kain,
Yung-Jue Bang, Eunice L Kwak,
Alice T Shaw,
Ravi Salgia,
Robert G Maki,
Jeffrey W Clark,
Keith D Wilner,
A John Iafrate
Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 12/2010; 5(12):2044-6. · 4.55 Impact Factor
