-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: B. anthracis edema (ET) and lethal (LT) toxins are each composed of protective antigen (PA), necessary for toxin uptake by host cells, and their respective toxic moieties, edema (EF) and lethal (LF) factors. Although both toxins likely contribute to shock during infection, their mechanisms are unclear. To test whether ET and LT produce arterial relaxation, their effects on phenylephrine (PE) stimulated contraction in a Sprague-Dawley rat aortic ring model were measured. Rings were prepared and connected to pressure transducers. Their viability was confirmed and peak contraction with 60mM KCL determined. Compared to PA pretreatment (control, 60 min), ET pretreatment at concentrations similar to ones noted in vivo decreased the mean (±SEM) maximum contractile force (MCF, % peak contraction) rings generated during stimulation with increasing PE concentrations (96.2±7.0 vs. 57.3±9.1) and increased the estimated PE concentration producing half the MCF (EC50, x10-7M) (1.1±0.3 vs. 3.7±0.8) (p≤0.002). ET inhibition with PA-directed mAb, selective EF inhibition with adefovir, or removal of ring endothelium reversed the effects of ET on MCF and EC50 (p≤0.02). Consistent with its adenyl-cyclase activity, ET increased tissue cAMP in endothelium intact but not denuded rings (p<0.0001 and 0.25 respectively). LT pretreatment even in high concentrations did not significantly decrease MCF or increase EC50 (all p>0.05). In rings pre-contracted with PE, compared to post-treatment with PA (90 min), ET post-treatment produced progressive reductions in contractile force and increases in relaxation in endothelium intact rings (p<0.0001) but not denuded rings (p=0.51). Thus, ET may contribute to shock by producing arterial relaxation.
AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology 04/2013; · 3.71 Impact Factor
-
Caitlin W Hicks,
Daniel A Sweeney,
Robert L Danner, Peter Q Eichacker,
Anthony F Suffredini,
Jing Feng,
Junfeng Sun,
Brad Moriyama,
Robert Wesley,
Ellen N Behrend,
Steven B Solomon,
Charles Natanson
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: The effects of stress-dose corticosteroid therapy were studied in a canine staphylococcal pneumonia model of septic shock. METHODS: Immediately following intrabronchial bacterial challenge, purpose-bred beagles were treated with stress doses of desoxycorticosterone (DOC), a mineralocorticoid agonist, and dexamethasone (DEX), a glucocorticoid agonist, or with placebo for 96 h. Oxacillin (30 mg/kg every 8 h) was started 4 h after infection onset. Bacterial dose was titrated to achieve 80-90 % lethality (n = 20) using an adaptive design; additional animals (n = 18) were investigated using the highest bacterial dose. RESULTS: Initial analysis of all animals (n = 38) demonstrated that the effects of DOC + DEX were significantly altered by bacterial dose (p = 0.04). The treatment effects of DOC + DEX were different in animals administered high or relatively lower bacterial doses in terms of survival (p = 0.05), shock reversal (p = 0.02), interleukin-6 levels (p = 0.02), and temperature (p = 0.01). DOC + DEX significantly improved the above parameters (p ≤ 0.03 for all) and lung injury scores (p = 0.02) after high-dose bacterial challenges, but not after lower challenges (p = not significant for all). Oxacillin trough levels were below the minimum inhibitory concentration of the infecting organism, and DOC + DEX increased the frequency of persistent staphylococcal bacteremia (odds ratio 3.09; 95 % confidence interval 1.05-9.11; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Stress-dose corticosteroids were only beneficial in cases of sepsis with high risk for death and even short courses may interfere with host mechanisms of bacterial clearance.
European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 10/2012; · 5.17 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bacillus anthracis infection (anthrax) can be highly lethal. Two recent outbreaks related to contaminated mail in the USA and heroin in the UK and Europe and its potential as a bioterrorist weapon have greatly increased concerns over anthrax in the developed world.
This review summarizes the microbiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of anthrax.
Anthrax, a gram-positive bacterium, has typically been associated with three forms of infection: cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and inhalational. However, the anthrax outbreak among injection drug users has emphasized the importance of what is now considered a fourth disease form (i.e., injectional anthrax) that is characterized by severe soft tissue infection. While cutaneous anthrax is most common, its early stages are distinct and prompt appropriate treatment commonly produces a good outcome. However, early symptoms with the other three disease forms can be nonspecific and mistaken for less lethal conditions. As a result, patients with gastrointestinal, inhalational, or injectional anthrax may have advanced infection at presentation that can be highly lethal. Once anthrax is suspected, the diagnosis can usually be made with gram stain and culture from blood or tissue followed by confirmatory testing (e.g., PCR). While antibiotics are the mainstay of anthrax treatment, use of adjunctive therapies such as anthrax toxin antagonists are a consideration. Prompt surgical therapy appears to be important for successful management of injectional anthrax.
European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 04/2012; 38(7):1092-104. · 5.17 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Anthrax-associated shock is closely linked to lethal toxin (LT) release and is highly lethal despite conventional hemodynamic support. We investigated whether protective antigen-directed monoclonal antibody (PA-mAb) treatment further augments titrated hemodynamic support.
Forty sedated, mechanically ventilated, instrumented canines challenged with anthrax LT were assigned to no treatment (controls), hemodynamic support alone (protocol-titrated fluids and norepinephrine), PA-mAb alone (administered at start of LT infusion [0 hours] or 9 or 12 hours later), or both, and observed for 96 hours. Although all 8 controls died, 2 of 8 animals receiving hemodynamic support alone survived (median survival times 65 vs 85 hours, respectively; P = .03). PA-mAb alone at 0 hour improved survival (5 of 5 animals survived), but efficacy decreased progressively with delayed treatment (9 hours, 2 of 3 survived; 12 hours, 0 of 4 survived) (P = .004 comparing survival across treatment times). However, combined treatment increased survival irrespective of PA-mAb administration time (0 hours, 4 of 5 animals; 9 hours, 3 of 3 animals; and 12 hours, 4 of 5 animals survived) (P = .95 comparing treatment times). Compared to hemodynamic support alone, when combined over PA-mAb treatment times (0, 9, and 12 hours), combination therapy produced higher survival (P = .008), central venous pressures, and left ventricular ejection fractions, and lower heart rates, norepinephrine requirements and fluid retention (P ≤ .03).
PA-mAb may augment conventional hemodynamic support during anthrax LT-associated shock.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases 03/2012; 205(5):818-29. · 6.41 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Septic shock is highly lethal and its incidence is increasing. Although TNF-α plays a key role in sepsis pathogenesis, past efforts to therapeutically inhibit it had limited success. However, there is continued interest in such therapies and there are now ongoing Phase II sepsis trials testing the effects of AZD9773, a TNF-directed polyclonal antibody fragment preparation. Experience with anti-inflammatory agents suggested that their efficacy may relate to sepsis-associated risk of death. AREAS COVERED: An overview of the biology of TNF and experimental data implicating TNF as a key mediator in sepsis pathogenesis; a review of the earlier clinical experience with anti-TNF therapies demonstrating that when examined across 12 trials, these agents had a highly consistent overall effect which although not reaching significance, was on the side of benefit; a review of data showing that sepsis-associated risk of death may influence the efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents like anti-TNF ones and a review of the rational and clinical experience to date with AZD9773 and its precursor, CytoFab. EXPERT OPINION: Discusses variables that may need to be accounted for to maximize the success of clinical trials in sepsis testing agents that modulate host inflammation.
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 10/2011; 20(11):1555-64. · 5.27 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Corticosteroid regimens that stimulate both mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid pathways consistently reverse vasopressor-dependent hypotension in septic shock but have variable effects on survival. The objective of this study was to determine whether exogenous mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid treatments have distinct effects and whether the timing of administration alters their effects in septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Desoxycorticosterone, a selective mineralocorticoid agonist; dexamethasone, a selective glucocorticoid agonist; and placebo were administered either several days before (prophylactic) or immediately after (therapeutic) infectious challenge and continued for 96 hrs in 74 canines with staphylococcal pneumonia.
Effects of desoxycorticosterone and dexamethasone were different and opposite depending on timing of administration for survival (p = .05); fluid requirements (p = .05); central venous pressures (p ≤ .007); indicators of hemoconcentration (i.e., sodium [p = .0004], albumin [p = .05], and platelet counts [p = .02]); interleukin-6 levels (p = .04); and cardiac dysfunction (p = .05). Prophylactic desoxycorticosterone treatment significantly improved survival, shock, and all the other outcomes stated, but therapeutic desoxycorticosterone did not. Conversely, prophylactic dexamethasone was much less effective for improving these outcomes compared with therapeutic dexamethasone with the exception of shock reversal. Prophylactic dexamethasone given before sepsis induction also significantly reduced serum aldosterone and cortisol levels and increased body temperature and lactate levels compared with therapeutic dexamethasone (p ≤ .05), consistent with adrenal suppression.
In septic shock, mineralocorticoids are only beneficial if given prophylactically, whereas glucocorticoids are most beneficial when given close to the onset of infection. Prophylactic mineralocorticoids should be further investigated in patients at high risk to develop sepsis, whereas glucocorticoids should only be administered therapeutically to prevent adrenal suppression and worse outcomes.
Critical care medicine 09/2011; 40(1):199-207. · 6.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Outbreaks of Bacillus anthracis in the US and Europe over the past 10 years have emphasized the health threat this lethal bacteria poses even for developed parts of the world. In contrast to cutaneous anthrax, inhalational disease in the US during the 2001 outbreaks and the newly identified injectional drug use form of disease in the UK and Germany have been associated with relatively high mortality rates. One notable aspect of these cases has been the difficulty in supporting patients once shock has developed. Anthrax bacilli produce several different components which likely contribute to this shock. Growing evidence indicates that both major anthrax toxins may produce substantial cardiovascular dysfunction. Lethal toxin (LT) can alter peripheral vascular function; it also has direct myocardial depressant effects. Edema toxin (ET) may have even more pronounced peripheral vascular effects than LT, including the ability to interfere with the actions of conventional vasopressors. Additionally, ET also appears capable of interfering with renal sodium and water retention. Importantly, the two toxins exert their actions via quite different mechanisms and therefore have the potential to worsen shock and outcome in an additive fashion. Finally, both toxins have the ability to inhibit host defense and microbial clearance, possibly contributing to the very high bacterial loads noted in patients dying with anthrax. This last point is clinically relevant since emerging data has begun to implicate other bacterial components such as anthrax cell wall in the shock and organ injury observed with infection. Taken together, accumulating evidence regarding the potential contribution of LT and ET to anthrax-associated shock supports efforts to develop adjunctive therapies that target both toxins in patients with progressive shock.
Toxins. 09/2011; 3(9):1185-202.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists [e.g., TNF soluble receptor (TNFsr)] improved survival in preclinical but not clinical sepsis trials. However fluid support-itself beneficial-is standard clinically but rarely employed in preclinical sepsis models. We hypothesized that these therapies may not have additive benefit.
Antibiotic-treated rats (n = 156) were randomized to intratracheal or intravenous Escherichia coli challenges (>LD50) and either placebo or TNFsr and 24 h fluid treatments alone or together. The survival effects of these therapies did not differ significantly comparing challenge routes. When averaged across route, while TNFsr or fluid alone decreased the hazard ratio of death significantly [ln ± standard error (SE): -0.65 ± 0.30 and -0.62 ± 0.30, respectively, p ≤ 0.05], together they did not (p = 0.16). Furthermore, the observed effect of TNFsr and fluid together on reducing the hazard ratio was significantly less than estimated (-0.37 ± 0.29 versus -1.27 ± 0.43, respectively, p = 0.027) based on TNFsr and fluid alone. While each treatment increased central venous pressure at 6 and 24 h, the observed effects of the combination were also less than estimated ones (p ≤ 0.0005).
The individual survival benefits of TNFsr and fluids were not additive in this rat sepsis model. Investigating new sepsis therapies together with conventional ones during preclinical testing may be informative.
European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 08/2011; 37(10):1688-95. · 5.17 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bacillus anthracis infection is rare in developed countries. However, recent outbreaks in the United States and Europe and the potential use of the bacteria for bioterrorism have focused interest on it. Furthermore, although anthrax was known to typically occur as one of three syndromes related to entry site of (i.e., cutaneous, gastrointestinal, or inhalational), a fourth syndrome including severe soft tissue infection in injectional drug users is emerging. Although shock has been described with cutaneous anthrax, it appears much more common with gastrointestinal, inhalational (5 of 11 patients in the 2001 outbreak in the United States), and injectional anthrax. Based in part on case series, the estimated mortalities of cutaneous, gastrointestinal, inhalational, and injectional anthrax are 1%, 25 to 60%, 46%, and 33%, respectively. Nonspecific early symptomatology makes initial identification of anthrax cases difficult. Clues to anthrax infection include history of exposure to herbivore animal products, heroin use, or clustering of patients with similar respiratory symptoms concerning for a bioterrorist event. Once anthrax is suspected, the diagnosis can usually be made with Gram stain and culture from blood or surgical specimens followed by confirmatory testing (e.g., PCR or immunohistochemistry). Although antibiotic therapy (largely quinolone-based) is the mainstay of anthrax treatment, the use of adjunctive therapies such as anthrax toxin antagonists is a consideration.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 08/2011; 184(12):1333-41. · 11.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: If thrombosis contributes to sepsis, heparin titrated using activated partial thromboplastin times may be efficacious. We investigated heparin in preclinical models.
In unchallenged mice (n = 107), heparin at 100, 500, or 2500 units/kg produced activated partial thromboplastin time levels less than, within, or greater than a prespecified therapeutic range (1.5-2.5 times control), respectively. In animals (n = 142) administered intratracheal Escherichia coli challenge, compared to placebo treatment, heparin at 100, 500, or 2500 units/kg were associated with dose dependent increases in the hazard ratios of death (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.08 [0.66, 1.76]; 1.34 [0.80, 2.24]; 3.02 [1.49, 6.10], respectively) (p = .001 for the dose effect). Compared to normal saline challenge, E. coli without heparin (i.e., with placebo) increased the activated partial thromboplastin time (p = .002) close to the therapeutic range. While heparin at 100 and 500 units/kg with E. coli further increased activated partial thromboplastin time (p < .0001 vs. placebo) within or above the therapeutic range, respectively, these did not decrease inflammatory cytokines or lung injury. In metaregression analysis of published preclinical studies, heparin improved survival with lipopolysaccharide (n = 23, p < .0001) or surgically induced infection (n = 14, p < .0001) but not monobacterial (n = 7, p = .29) challenges.
Coagulopathy with sepsis or other variables, such as type of infectious source, may influence the efficacy of heparin therapy for sepsis.
Critical care medicine 05/2011; 39(5):1104-12. · 6.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Sepsis remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite years of extensive research, effective drugs that inhibit the pro-inflammatory effects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and improve outcome when added to conventional sepsis treatments are lacking. Eritoran tetrasodium (E5564) is a promising candidate therapy for sepsis belonging to a new class of such drugs which inhibit LPS-induced inflammation by blocking toll-like receptor 4. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the rationale for the use of eritoran tetrasodium in sepsis as well as on its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety. Preclinical and clinical studies from a MEDLINE/PubMed literature search in August 2010 with the search terms 'eritoran' and 'E5564' are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies of eritoran tetrasodium indicate it can limit excessive inflammatory mediator release associated with LPS and improve survival in sepsis models. While early clinical results are promising, its efficacy and safety for treating patients with sepsis are currently under investigation. Even if the ongoing Phase III clinical trial enrolling patients with severe sepsis and increased risk of death shows benefit from eritoran, questions remain and confirmatory studies would be necessary to define its clinical usage.
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 02/2011; 7(4):479-94. · 3.12 Impact Factor
-
Laith Altaweel,
Zhaochun Chen,
Mahtab Moayeri,
Xizhong Cui,
Yan Li,
Junwu Su,
Yvonne Fitz,
Syd Johnson,
Stephen H Leppla,
Robert Purcell, Peter Q Eichacker
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: W1-mAb is a chimpanzee-derived monoclonal antibody to protective antigen that improved survival when administered before anthrax lethal toxin challenge in rats. To better define W1-mAb's efficacy for anthrax, we administered it after initiation of 24-hr infusions of edema toxin and lethal toxin either alone or together in rats or following anthrax spore challenge in mice.
W1-mAb or placebo treatment.
In toxin-challenged rats treated with placebo, survival rates were lower with edema toxin (500 μg/kg) compared to lethal toxin either alone (175 μg/kg) or with edema toxin (175 μg/kg each) (8%, 33%, and 32%, respectively), but the median time to death was longer (36, 11, and 9 hrs, respectively) (p ≤ .01 for all comparisons). W1-mAb administered up to 12 hrs after edema toxin and 6 hrs after lethal toxin increased survival and reduced hypotension (p ≤ .01). However, only administration of W1-mAb at 0 hrs improved these variables with lethal toxin and edema toxin together (p ≤ .0002). In C57BL/6J mice challenged with anthrax spores subcutaneously, compared to placebo treatment (0 of 15 animals survived), W1-mAb administered beginning 24 hrs after challenge increased survival (13 of 15 survived) (p ≤ .0001).
While rapidity of lethality may influence the effectiveness of delayed W1-mAb treatment, these rat and mouse studies provide a basis for further exploring this agent's usefulness for anthrax.
Critical care medicine 02/2011; 39(6):1439-47. · 6.37 Impact Factor
-
Caitlin W Hicks,
Yan Li,
Shu Okugawa,
Steven B Solomon,
Mahtab Moayeri,
Stephen H Leppla,
Ajana Mohanty,
G Mani Subramanian,
Thi S Mignone,
Yvonne Fitz,
Xizhong Cui, Peter Q Eichacker
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: While anthrax edema toxin produces pronounced tachycardia and lethal toxin depresses left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction in in vivo models, whether these changes reflect direct cardiac effects as opposed to indirect ones related to preload or afterload alterations is unclear. In the present study, the effects of edema toxin and lethal toxin were investigated in a constant pressure isolated perfused rat heart model. Compared with control hearts, edema toxin at doses comparable to or less than a dose that produced an 80% lethality rate (LD(80)) in vivo in rats (200, 100, and 50 ng/ml) produced rapid increases in heart rate (HR), coronary flow (CF), LV developed pressure (LVDP), dP/dt(max), and rate-pressure product (RPP) that were most pronounced and persisted with the lowest dose (P ≤ 0.003). Edema toxin (50 ng/ml) increased effluent and myocardial cAMP levels (P ≤ 0.002). Compared with dobutamine, edema toxin produced similar myocardial changes, but these occurred more slowly and persisted longer. Increases in HR, CF, and cAMP with edema toxin were inhibited by a monoclonal antibody blocking toxin uptake and by adefovir, which inhibits the toxin's intracellular adenyl cyclase activity (P ≤ 0.05). Lethal toxin at an LD(80) dose (50 ng/ml) had no significant effect on heart function but a much higher dose (500 ng/ml) reduced all parameters (P ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, edema toxin produced cAMP-mediated myocardial chronotropic, inotropic, and vasodilatory effects. Vasodilation systemically with edema toxin could contribute to shock during anthrax while masking potential inotropic effects. Although lethal toxin produced myocardial depression, this only occurred at high doses, and its relevance to in vivo findings is unclear.
AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology 01/2011; 300(3):H1108-18. · 3.71 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: High mortality in the 2001 US and recent European anthrax outbreaks suggests that better understanding of the effects of the toxins produced by this bacterium is needed to improve treatment.
Here, 24-h edema (ETx) and lethal (LeTx) toxin infusions were investigated for 96 hin sedated canines receiving mechanical ventilation. The initial study compared similarly lethal doses of ETx (n=8) or LeTx (n=15) alone. ETx was 24 times less lethal than LeTx, and the median time to death in nonsurvivors (n=6 and n=9, respectively) was shorter with ETx (42 vs 67 h; P=.04). Compared with controls(n=9), both toxins decreased arterial and central venous pressures and systemic vascular resistance and increased heart rate, cardiac index, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, creatinine (Cr) concentration, BUN:Cr ratio, and hepatic transaminase levels (P ≤ .05 for toxin effect or time interaction). However, ETx stimulated early diuresis,reduced serum sodium levels, and had more pronounced vasodilatory effects, compared with LeTx, as reflected by greater or earlier central venous pressures, systemic vascular resistance, and changes in the BUN:Cr ratio(P ≤ .01). LeTx progressively decreased the left ventricular ejection fraction (P ≤ .002). In a subsequent study, a lethal dose of LeTx with an equimolar nonlethal ETx dose (n=8) increased mortality, compared with LeTx alone (n=8; P= .05).
Shock with ETx or LeTx may require differing supportive therapies, whereas toxin antagonists should likely target both toxins.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases 11/2010; 202(12):1885-96. · 6.41 Impact Factor
-
European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 10/2010; 36(10):1631-2. · 5.17 Impact Factor
-
Anesthesia and analgesia 08/2010; 111(2):576-7; author reply 577. · 3.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Supporting its therapeutic application in sepsis, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibition decreases cardiopulmonary injury and lethality with lipopolysaccharide challenge. However, only one preclinical study has reported the survival effects of a p38 inhibitor (SB203580, 100 mg/kg) during infection. We therefore tested SB203580 in mice (n = 763) challenged with intratracheal Escherichia coli and treated with antibiotics and fluids.
Compared with placebo, high dose SB203580 (100 mg/kg) pretreatment increased the hazards ratio of death (95% confidence interval) (3.6 [2.1, 6.1], p < 0.0001). Decreasing doses (10, 1, or 0.1 mg/kg) went from being harmful to having no significant effect (p < 0.0001 for the effect of decreasing dose). At 48 hours, but not 24 hours after E. coli, high and low dose SB203580 pretreatment decreased cardiac phosphorylated p38 MAPK levels and improved cardiac output either (p <or= 0.07). Low dose SB203580 did not alter lung neutrophils significantly but increased lung injury at 48 hours (p = 0.05). High dose decreased lung neutrophils and injury at 24 hours (p = 0.09 and 0.01, respectively) but then increased them at 48 hours (both p <or= 0.01). Lung injury was greater with high versus low dose at 48 hours (p = 0.002).
Thus, SB203580 had divergent effects on cardiac and lung function in E. coli challenged mice. Furthermore, high dose worsened survival and low dose did not improve it. Altogether, these findings suggest that clearly defining the risks and benefits of p38 MAPK inhibition is important before such treatment is applied in patients with or at risk of serious infection.
The Journal of trauma 06/2010; 68(6):1317-27. · 2.48 Impact Factor
-
Critical care medicine 01/2010; 38(1):306-8. · 6.37 Impact Factor
-
Amisha V Barochia,
Xizhong Cui,
David Vitberg,
Anthony F Suffredini,
Naomi P O'Grady,
Steven M Banks,
Peter Minneci,
Steven J Kern,
Robert L Danner,
Charles Natanson, Peter Q Eichacker
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sepsis bundles have been developed to improve patient outcomes by combining component therapies. Valid bundles require effective components with additive benefits. Proponents encourage evaluation of bundles, both as a whole and based on the performance of each component.
Assess the association between outcome and the utilization of component therapies in studies of sepsis bundles.
Database searches (January 1980 to July 2008) of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, using the terms sepsis, bundles, guidelines, and early goal directed therapy.
Inclusion required comparison of septic adults who received bundled care vs. nonprotocolized care. Survival and use rates for individual interventions were abstracted.
Eight unblinded trials, one randomized and seven with historical controls, were identified. Sepsis bundles were associated with a consistent (I2 = 0%, p = .87) and significant increase in survival (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-2.45; p < .0001). For all studies reporting such data, there were consistent (I2 = 0%, p > or = .64) decreases in time to antibiotics, and increases in the appropriateness of antibiotics (p < or = .0002 for both). In contrast, significant heterogeneity was seen across trials for all other treatments (antibiotic use within a specified time period; administration of fluids, vasopressors, inotropes, and packed red blood cells titrated to hemodynamic goals; corticosteroids and human recombinant activated protein C use) (all I2 > or = 67%, p < .002). Except for antibiotics, sepsis bundle components are still being investigated for efficacy in randomized controlled trials.
Bundle use was associated with consistent and significant improvement in survival and antibiotic use. Use of other bundle components changed heterogeneously across studies, making their impact on survival uncertain. However, this analysis should be interpreted cautiously as these studies were unblinded, and only one was randomized.
Critical care medicine 12/2009; 38(2):668-78. · 6.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Appropriate control group selection in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a critical factor in generating results, which are both interpretable and generalizable. Control groups ideally encompass and realistically reflect prevailing medical practices. This goal can be challenging in investigations of standard therapies that are routinely titrated. To eliminate the heterogeneity in clinical practice from the trial design, recent investigations of titrated therapies have randomized patients to fixed-dose regimens. Although this approach may produce statistically significant differences, the results may not be interpretable or generalizable. In this trial design, randomization disrupts the normal relationship between clinically important characteristics and therapy titration, thereby creating subgroups of patients within each study arm that receive levels of therapy inconsistent with current practices outside of the clinical study. These misaligned subgroups may have worse outcomes than usual care. Practice misalignments can occur in any clinical trial of a preexisting therapy that is typically adjusted based on severity of illness or other patient characteristics. In this study, we review three recent RCTs to demonstrate how practice misalignments can affect the safety, results, and conclusions of RCTs. Furthermore, we discuss methods to prospectively identify potentially important relationships between therapy titration and patient- and disease-specific characteristics. Finally, we review trial design options that may minimize the occurrence and impact of practice misalignments. Because these designs may limit the feasibility of a clinical trial, a thorough characterization of usual care is necessary to determine whether one of these designs should be used to protect patient safety.
Anesthesia and analgesia 10/2009; 111(2):444-50. · 3.08 Impact Factor
