Astrid M L Kappers

VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdamo, North Holland, Netherlands

Are you Astrid M L Kappers?

Claim your profile

Publications (283)445.08 Total impact

  • Source
    Sander E. M. Jansen · Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M. L. Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to acquire information concerning the geometry and material of handheld objects, people tend to execute stereotypical hand movement patterns called haptic Exploratory Procedures (EPs). Manual annotation of haptic exploration trials with these EPs is a laborious task that is affected by subjectivity, attentional lapses, and viewing angle limitations. In this paper we propose an automatic EP annotation method based on position and orientation data from motion tracking sensors placed on both hands and inside a stimulus. A set of kinematic variables is computed from these data and compared to sets of predefined criteria for each of four EPs. Whenever all criteria for a specific EP are met, it is assumed that that particular hand movement pattern was performed. This method is applied to data from an experiment where blindfolded participants haptically discriminated between objects differing in hardness, roughness, volume, and weight. In order to validate the method, its output is compared to manual annotation based on video recordings of the same trials. Although mean pairwise agreement is less between human-automatic pairs than between human-human pairs (55.7% vs 74.5%), the proposed method performs much better than random annotation (2.4%). Furthermore, each EP is linked to a specific object property for which it is optimal (e.g., Lateral Motion for roughness). We found that the percentage of trials where the expected EP was found does not differ between manual and automatic annotation. For now, this method cannot yet completely replace a manual annotation procedure. However, it could be used as a starting point that can be supplemented by manual annotation.
    PLoS ONE 02/2015; 10(2):e0117017. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0117017 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Vonne van Polanen · Wouter M Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M L Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a haptic search task, one has to detect the presence of a target among distractors using the sense of touch. A salient target can be detected faster than a non-salient target. However, little is known about the exploration strategies that are used, especially in 3D search tasks where items are held in the hand. In this study, we investigated which parts of the hand were used to contact the target and which strategies were performed. Blindfolded participants performed search tasks in four conditions, where the targets differed in relevant property and saliency. The positions of the target and the hand were tracked during exploration. It was found that target saliency had a large effect on the use of the hand parts and the strategies. In the non-salient target conditions, the fingers, especially the thumb, contacted the target more often than in the salient target conditions. This could also be seen in the strategies, where the thumb was used to explore the items in a serial way by moving them in the hand or touching them individually. In the salient target conditions, more parallel strategies like grasping or shuffling of the items in the hand were used.
    Scientific Reports 09/2014; 4:6254. DOI:10.1038/srep06254 · 5.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Femke E van Beek · Wouter M Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M L Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While quite some research has focussed on the accuracy of haptic perception of distance, information on the precision of haptic perception of distance is still scarce, particularly regarding distances perceived by making arm movements. In this study, eight conditions were measured to answer four main questions, which are: what is the influence of reference distance, movement axis, perceptual mode (active or passive) and stimulus type on the precision of this kind of distance perception? A discrimination experiment was performed with twelve participants. The participants were presented with two distances, using either a haptic device or a real stimulus. Participants compared the distances by moving their hand from a start to an end position. They were then asked to judge which of the distances was the longer, from which the discrimination threshold was determined for each participant and condition. The precision was influenced by reference distance. No effect of movement axis was found. The precision was higher for active than for passive movements and it was a bit lower for real stimuli than for rendered stimuli, but it was not affected by adding cutaneous information. Overall, the Weber fraction for the active perception of a distance of 25 or 35 cm was about 11% for all cardinal axes. The recorded position data suggest that participants, in order to be able to judge which distance was the longer, tried to produce similar speed profiles in both movements. This knowledge could be useful in the design of haptic devices.
    PLoS ONE 08/2014; 9(8):e104769. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0104769 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Daisuke Shibata · Astrid M L Kappers · Marco Santello
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Humans are able to modulate digit forces as a function of position despite changes in digit placement that might occur from trial to trial or when changing grip type for object manipulation. Although this phenomenon is likely to rely on sensing the position of the digits relative to each other and the object, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To address this question, we asked subjects (n = 30) to match perceived vertical distance between the center of pressure (CoP) of the thumb and index finger pads (dy ) of the right hand ("reference" hand) using the same hand ("test" hand). The digits of reference hand were passively placed collinearly (dy = 0 mm). Subjects were then asked to exert different combinations of normal and tangential digit forces (Fn and Ftan , respectively) using the reference hand and then match the memorized dy using the test hand. The reference hand exerted Ftan of thumb and index finger in either same or opposite direction. We hypothesized that, when the tangential forces of the digits are produced in opposite directions, matching error (1) would be biased toward the directions of the tangential forces; and (2) would be greater when the remembered relative contact points are matched with negligible digit force production. For the test hand, digit forces were either negligible (0.5-1 N, 0 ± 0.25 N; Experiment 1) or the same as those exerted by the reference hand (Experiment 2).Matching error was biased towards the direction of digit tangential forces: thumb CoP was placed higher than the index finger CoP when thumb and index finger Ftan were directed upward and downward, respectively, and vice versa (p < 0.001). However, matching error was not dependent on whether the reference and test hand exerted similar or different forces. We propose that the expected sensory consequence of motor commands for tangential forces in opposite directions overrides estimation of fingertip position through haptic sensory feedback.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 08/2014; 8:564. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00564 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Eurohaptics 2014; 07/2014
  • Vonne van Polanen · Wouter M Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M L Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a haptic search task, one has to determine the presence of a target among distractors. It has been shown that if the target differs from the distractors in two properties, shape and texture, performance is better than in both single-property conditions (Van Polanen, Bergmann Tiest, & Kappers, 2013). The search for a smooth sphere among rough cubical distractors was faster than both the searches for a rough sphere (shape information only) and for a smooth cube (texture information only). This effect was replicated in this study as a baseline. The main focus here was to further investigate the nature of this integration. It was shown that performance is better when the two properties are combined in a single target (smooth sphere), than when located in two separate targets (rough sphere and smooth cube) that are simultaneously present. A race model that assumes independent parallel processing of the two properties could explain the enhanced performance with two properties, but this could only take place effectively when the two properties were located in a single target.
    Acta psychologica 05/2014; 150C:35-40. DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.004 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Virjanand Panday · Wouter M Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M L Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: From previous studies, it is unclear how bimanual length discrimination differs from unimanual length discrimination. To investigate the difference, we designed an experiment with four conditions. In the first two conditions, unimanual and bimanual discrimination thresholds are determined. In the third and fourth conditions, length is explored with the two index fingers like in the bimanual condition, but the reference is either internal, by clasping the hands together, or external, by grasping handles connected to the table. We find that thresholds for the unimanual condition (7.0 %) and the clasping condition (9.2 %) are both lower than for the bimanual condition (16 %) and the grasping handles condition (15 %). We conclude that when discriminating length unimanually and bimanually while clasping the hands together, the internal reference within the hand can be used and that explains the lower discrimination thresholds.
    Experimental Brain Research 05/2014; 232(9). DOI:10.1007/s00221-014-3974-1 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Haptic perception is bidirectionally related to exploratory movements, which means that exploration influences perception, but perception also influences exploration. We can optimize or change exploratory movements according to the perception and/or the task, consciously or unconsciously. This paper presents a psychophysical experiment on active roughness perception to investigate movement changes as the haptic task changes. Exerted normal force and scanning velocity are measured in different perceptual tasks (discrimination or identification) using rough and smooth stimuli. The results show that humans use a greater variation in contact force for the smooth stimuli than for the rough stimuli. Moreover, they use higher scanning velocities and shorter break times between stimuli in the discrimination task than in the identification task. Thus, in roughness perception humans spontaneously use different strategies that seem effective for the perceptual task and the stimuli. A control task, in which the participants just explore the stimuli without any perceptual objective, shows that humans use a smaller contact force and a lower scanning velocity for the rough stimuli than for the smooth stimuli. Possibly, these strategies are related to aversiveness while exploring stimuli.
    PLoS ONE 03/2014; 9(3):e93363. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093363 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Astrid M L Kappers · Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RECENTLY, WE SHOWED A STRONG HAPTIC SIZE AFTEREFFECT BY MEANS OF A SIZE BISECTION TASK: after adaptation to a large sphere, subsequently grasped smaller test spheres felt even smaller, and vice versa. In the current study, we questioned whether the strength of this aftereffect depends on shape. In four experimental conditions, we determined the aftereffect after adaptation to spheres and tetrahedra and subsequent testing also with spheres and tetrahedra. The results showed a clear influence of shape: the haptic aftereffect was much stronger if adaptation and test stimuli were identical in shape than if their shapes were different. Therefore, it would be more appropriate to term such aftereffects haptic shape-size aftereffects, as size alone could not be the determining factor. This influence of shape suggests that higher cortical areas are involved in this aftereffect and that it cannot be due to adaptation of peripheral receptors. An additional finding is that the geometric property or combination of properties participants use in the haptic size bisection task varies widely over participants, although participants themselves are quite consistent.
    PLoS ONE 02/2014; 9(2):e88729. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0088729 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Virjanand Panday · Wouter M Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M L Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated if and how length and curvature information are integrated when an object is explored in one hand. Subjects were asked to explore four types of objects between thumb and index finger. Objects differed in either length, curvature, both length and curvature correlated as in a circle, or anti-correlated. We found that when both length and curvature are present, performance is significantly better than when only one of the two cues is available. Therefore, we conclude that there is integration of length and curvature. Moreover, if the two cues are correlated in a circular cross-section instead of in an anti-correlated way, performance is better than predicted by a combination of two independent cues. We conclude that integration of curvature and length is highly efficient when the cues in the object are combined as in a circle, which is the most common combination of curvature and length in daily life.
    Scientific Reports 01/2014; 4:3856. DOI:10.1038/srep03856 · 5.58 Impact Factor
  • Vonne van Polanen · Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M.L. Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a haptic search task, one has to determine the presence of a target among distractors. It has been shown that if the target differs from the distractors in two properties, shape and texture, performance is better than in both single-property conditions (Van Polanen, Bergmann Tiest, & Kappers, 2013). The search for a smooth sphere among rough cubical distractors was faster than both the searches for a rough sphere (shape information only) and for a smooth cube (texture information only). This effect was replicated in this study as a baseline. The main focus here was to further investigate the nature of this integration. It was shown that performance is better when the two properties are combined in a single target (smooth sphere), than when located in two separate targets (rough sphere and smooth cube) that are simultaneously present. A race model that assumes independent parallel processing of the two properties could explain the enhanced performance with two properties, but this could only take place effectively when the two properties were located in a single target.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Haptic exploratory procedures (EPs) are prototypical hand movements that are linked to the acquisition of specific object properties. In studies of haptic perception, hand movements are often classified into these EPs. Here, we aim to investigate several EPs in a quantitative manner to understand how hand dynamics and contact forces differ between them. These dissimilarities are then used to construct an EP identification model capable of discriminating between EPs based on the index finger position and contact force. The extent to which the instructed EPs were distinct, repeatable, and similar across subjects was confirmed by showing that more than 95 percent of the analyzed trials were classified correctly. Finally, the method is employed to investigate haptic exploratory behavior during similarity judgments based on several object properties. It seems that discrimination based on material properties (hardness, roughness, and temperature) yields more consistent classification results compared to discrimination based on the acquisition of shape information.
    IEEE Transactions on Haptics 10/2013; 6(4):464-472. DOI:10.1109/TOH.2013.22 · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • Astrid M L Kappers · Wouter M Bergmann Tiest
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Haptic matching of the orientation of bars separated by a horizontal distance leads to large systematic deviations. This finding leads to the following intriguing question which we investigated in this study: How will a bar moving from left to right in a fixed orientation be perceived by blindfolded observers? Interestingly, this previous finding predicts that the translating bar will cause the illusory perception of a rotation. In our experiment, we used psychophysical methods to determine the rotation needed to perceive the bar as non-rotating, for both rightward and leftward translations. From our results, it can be estimated that, on average, a bar translating in parallel over 60 cm is perceived as rotating 18°, so we established that the predicted illusory rotation indeed exists. This implies that static and dynamic signals are processed in a similar way.
    Experimental Brain Research 09/2013; 231(3). DOI:10.1007/s00221-013-3695-x · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • Sander E. M. Jansen · Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M. L. Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Active movement of the hand and fingers enables dynamic exploration of objects. Lederman and Klatzky [1987] have proposed a set of stereotyped movement patterns called Exploratory Procedures (EPs) that are linked to the acquisition of knowledge concerning specific object properties. For example, lateral motion is the optimal EP for acquiring roughness information and compliance is best estimated by employing pressure.
    Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception; 08/2013
  • Rick van Dijk · Astrid M L Kappers · Albert Postma
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study investigated haptic spatial orientation processing in deaf signers, hearing sign language interpreters, and hearing controls. Blindfolded participants had to set two bars parallel in the horizontal plane, with either a 2-s or a 10-s delay between inspection of the reference bar and the setting of the test bar. The deaf group outperformed the other two groups which did not differ from each other. Together these results indicate that deaf individuals can better identify the allocentric spatial coordinates of haptically inspected orientations. These results are discussed in terms of the possible neurocognitive consequences of auditory deprivation.
    Experimental Brain Research 07/2013; 230(3). DOI:10.1007/s00221-013-3653-7 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Vonne van Polanen · Wouter M Bergmann Tiest · Astrid M L Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a search task, where one has to search for the presence of a target among distractors, the target is sometimes easily found, whereas in other searches it is much harder to find. The performance in a search task is influenced by the identity of the target, the identity of the distractors and the differences between the two. In this study, these factors were manipulated by varying the target and distractors in shape (cube or sphere) and roughness (rough or smooth) in a haptic search task. Participants had to grasp a bundle of items and determine as fast as possible whether a predefined target was present or not. It was found that roughness and edges were relatively salient features and the search for the presence of these features was faster than for their absence. If the task was easy, the addition of these features could also disrupt performance, even if they were irrelevant for the search task. Another important finding was that the search for a target that differed in two properties from the distractors was faster than a task with only a single property difference, although this was only found if the two target properties were non-salient. This means that shape and texture can be effectively integrated. Finally, it was found that edges are more beneficial to a search task than disrupting, whereas for roughness this was the other way round.
    PLoS ONE 07/2013; 8(7):e70255. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0070255 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two experiments evaluated the ability of 30 older and younger adults to discriminate the curvature of simple object surfaces from static and dynamic touch. The ages of the older adults ranged from 66 to 85 years, while those of the younger adults ranged from 20 to 29 years. For each participant in both experiments, the minimum curvature magnitude needed to reliably discriminate between convex and concave surfaces was determined. In Experiment 1, participants used static touch to make their judgments of curvature, while dynamic touch was used in Experiment 2. When static touch was used to discriminate curvature, a large effect of age occurred (the thresholds were 0.67 & 1.11/m for the younger and older participants, respectively). However, when participants used dynamic touch, there was no significant difference between the ability of younger and older participants to discriminate curvature (the thresholds were 0.58 & 0.59/m for the younger and older participants, respectively). The results of the current study demonstrate that while older adults can accurately discriminate surface curvature from dynamic touch, they possess significant impairments for static touch.
    PLoS ONE 07/2013; 8(7):e68577. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0068577 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Virjanand Panday · W.M.B. Tiest · A.M.L. Kappers
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For small stimuli, it has been shown that subjects are very accurate in distinguishing a cylinder with an elliptical cross section from one with a circular cross section. In such a task, both curvature and length are integrated effectively. Large cylinders are explored differently: either by one hand or by two hands sliding over the surface. However, the same cues are available. We investigated the integration of position and curvature in unimanual and bimanual explorations. In Experiment 1, curved surfaces were presented as part of a horizontal cylinder with a cross section that was either a horizontally or a vertically elongated ellipse. We found that discrimination thresholds for unimanual exploration were significantly larger than for bimanual exploration. In Experiment 2, we found that position discrimination thresholds were independent of the type of exploration (unimanual or bimanual) and surprisingly also independent of the reference length. In Experiment 3, we found that discrimination thresholds for the position of the midsagittal plane were on an average lower than the position discrimination thresholds found in Experiment 2. From these findings, we conclude that the lower thresholds in Experiment 1 for bimanual exploration compared to unimanual exploration are due to the integration of curvature, not position or uncertainty of the midsagittal plane in unimanual exploration.
    IEEE Transactions on Haptics 07/2013; 6(3):285-295. DOI:10.1109/TOH.2013.8 · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • Astrid M. L. Kappers · Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fueled by novel applications, interest in haptic perception is growing. This paper provides an overview of the state of the art of a number of important aspects of haptic perception. By means of touch we can not only perceive quite different material properties, such as roughness, compliance, friction, coldness and slipperiness, but we can also perceive spatial properties, such as shape, curvature, size and orientation. Moreover, the number of objects we have in our hand can be determined, either by counting or subitizing. All these aspects will be presented and discussed in this paper. Although our intuition tells us that touch provides us with veridical information about our environment, the existence of prominent haptic illusions will show otherwise. Knowledge about haptic perception is interesting from a fundamental viewpoint, but it also is of eminent importance in the technological development of haptic devices. At the end of this paper, a few recent applications will be presented. WIREs Cogn Sci 2013, 4:357–374. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1238 Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
    Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science 07/2013; 4(4). DOI:10.1002/wcs.1238 · 0.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study examined exploratory procedures (EPs) of congenitally blind and sighted children and adults on a haptic match-to-sample task. The aim was to examine the influence of age, visual status, and familiarity on the use of EPs when people haptically examine the object properties of weight, size, exact shape, and texture. EPs in the first and last of four series of trials were compared. The results showed that all four groups chose the same dominant EP for examining the four different object properties, all of them in agreement with the ones found by Lederman and Klatzky (Cognitive Psychology 19:342-368, 1987). Children were found to use more EPs, rather than using only the most efficient EP, for the dimension under study. Overall, performance was affected more by age than by visual status, and repeating the task led to increased efficiency in all groups. To describe exploratory behaviors in more detail, actions were introduced. Actions are single or sequential hand movements occurring in parallel with the EPs or apart from the EPs. The use of actions explained, in part, individual variation among the participants.
    Attention Perception & Psychophysics 06/2013; 75(7). DOI:10.3758/s13414-013-0479-0 · 2.15 Impact Factor

Publication Stats

3k Citations
445.08 Total Impact Points

Institutions

  • 2013–2015
    • VU University Amsterdam
      • • MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam
      • • Faculty of Human Movement Sciences
      Amsterdamo, North Holland, Netherlands
  • 1996–2013
    • Utrecht University
      • • Helmholtz Institute
      • • Division of Physics of Man
      Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • 1996–2007
    • The Ohio State University
      • Department of Psychology
      Columbus, OH, United States
  • 1992–2000
    • Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht
      Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands