-
Fergus J Couch,
Xianshu Wang,
Lesley McGuffog,
Andrew Lee,
Curtis Olswold,
Karoline B Kuchenbaecker,
Penny Soucy,
Zachary Fredericksen,
Daniel Barrowdale,
Joe Dennis, [......],
Chen Wang,
Steven Hart,
Kristen Stevens,
Jacques Simard,
Tomi Pastinen,
Vernon S Pankratz,
Kenneth Offit,
Douglas F Easton,
Georgia Chenevix-Trench,
Antonis C Antoniou
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BRCA1-associated breast and ovarian cancer risks can be modified by common genetic variants. To identify further cancer risk-modifying loci, we performed a multi-stage GWAS of 11,705 BRCA1 carriers (of whom 5,920 were diagnosed with breast and 1,839 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer), with a further replication in an additional sample of 2,646 BRCA1 carriers. We identified a novel breast cancer risk modifier locus at 1q32 for BRCA1 carriers (rs2290854, P = 2.7×10(-8), HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.20). In addition, we identified two novel ovarian cancer risk modifier loci: 17q21.31 (rs17631303, P = 1.4×10(-8), HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38) and 4q32.3 (rs4691139, P = 3.4×10(-8), HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38). The 4q32.3 locus was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in the general population or BRCA2 carriers, suggesting a BRCA1-specific association. The 17q21.31 locus was also associated with ovarian cancer risk in 8,211 BRCA2 carriers (P = 2×10(-4)). These loci may lead to an improved understanding of the etiology of breast and ovarian tumors in BRCA1 carriers. Based on the joint distribution of the known BRCA1 breast cancer risk-modifying loci, we estimated that the breast cancer lifetime risks for the 5% of BRCA1 carriers at lowest risk are 28%-50% compared to 81%-100% for the 5% at highest risk. Similarly, based on the known ovarian cancer risk-modifying loci, the 5% of BRCA1 carriers at lowest risk have an estimated lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer of 28% or lower, whereas the 5% at highest risk will have a risk of 63% or higher. Such differences in risk may have important implications for risk prediction and clinical management for BRCA1 carriers.
PLoS Genetics 03/2013; 9(3):e1003212. · 8.69 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Clinical Oncology 01/2013; · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Microsatellite instability is the consequence of a deficient mismatch repair system. It has a key role in the diagnostic strategy of Lynch syndrome, where tumours are all characterized by the presence of this phenotype. Microsatellite instability is therefore essential in the selection of colorectal cancer patients in whom a germline analysis of Mismatch Repair genes is possibly indicated. Moreover, microsatellite instability tumours are associated with a good prognosis and a resistance to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy, which has a clinical application mainly in stage II colon cancer patients in whom adjuvant chemotherapy has a less beneficial effect than in stage III and outcome in presence of microsatellite instability is excellent. Recent data suggest that impact of microsatellite instability on benefit to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy is dependent of the molecular mechanism involved in this genetic instability since an improved survival has been reported with adjuvant fluorouracil in microsatellite instability colorectal cancers of germline origin but not in sporadic cases. Predictive value of microsatellite instability on response to fluorouracil/oxaliplatin adjuvant chemotherapy has been less evaluated but recent studies suggest that the favorable outcome of Microsatellite instability tumours is maintained in patients receiving FOLFOX.
Digestive and Liver Disease 11/2012; · 3.05 Impact Factor
-
Emmanuel Labourier,
Jeroen R Dijkstra,
J Han J M van Krieken,
Frank J M Opdam,
Jerry Boonyaratanakornkit,
E Ralf Schönbrunner,
Mona Shahbazian,
Anders Edsjö,
Gerald Hoefler,
Andreas Jung,
Athanassios Kotsinas,
Vassilis G Gorgoulis,
Fernando López-Ríos,
Karin de Stricker, Etienne Rouleau,
Bart Biesmans
The Journal of molecular diagnostics: JMD 11/2012; 14(6):631-3. · 3.48 Impact Factor
-
Pascaline Gaildrat,
Sophie Krieger,
Daniela Di Giacomo,
Julie Abdat,
Françoise Révillion,
Sandrine Caputo,
Dominique Vaur,
Estelle Jamard,
Elodie Bohers,
Danielle Ledemeney,
Jean-Philippe Peyrat,
Claude Houdayer, Etienne Rouleau,
Rosette Lidereau,
Thierry Frébourg,
Agnès Hardouin,
Mario Tosi,
Alexandra Martins
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Exonic variants of unknown biological significance (VUS) identified in patients can affect mRNA splicing, either by changing 5' or 3' splice sites or by modifying splicing regulatory elements. Bioinformatic predictions of these elements are still inaccurate and only few such elements have been functionally mapped in BRCA2. We studied the effect on splicing of eight exon 7 VUS, selected from the French UMD-BRCA2 mutation database.
We performed splicing minigene assays and analyses of patient RNA. We also developed a pyrosequencing-based quantitative assay, to measure, in patient RNA, the relative contribution of each allele to the production of exon 7-containing transcripts. Moreover, an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE)-dependent minigene assay was used to evaluate the splicing regulatory properties of wild-type and mutant segments.
Six out of the eight variants induced splicing defects. In the minigene assay, c.517G>T and c.631G>A altered the natural splice sites, c.572A>G created a new 5' splice site, and c.520C>T, c.587G>A and c.617C>G induced exon 7 skipping (66%, 25% and 46%, respectively). Pyrosequencing of patient RNA confirmed these levels of exon skipping for c.520C>T and c.617C>G. Results from the ESE-dependent minigene assay indicated that c.520C>T and c.587G>A disturb splicing regulatory elements.
BRCA2 exon 7 splicing is regulated by multiple exonic elements and is sensitive to disease-associated sequence variations. Measurements of allelic imbalance in patient-derived RNA and/or quantitative analyses using minigene assays provide valuable estimates of the extent of partial splicing defects. Assessment of pathogenicity of variants with partial splicing effect awaits additional evidence and especially the completion of segregation analyses.
Journal of Medical Genetics 09/2012; 49(10):609-17. · 6.36 Impact Factor
-
Corine Bertolotto,
Fabienne Lesueur,
Sandy Giuliano,
Thomas Strub,
Mahaut de Lichy,
Karine Bille,
Philippe Dessen,
Benoit d'Hayer,
Hamida Mohamdi,
Audrey Remenieras, [......],
Laurence Venat-Bouvet,
Hélène Zattara,
Valérie Chaudru,
Gilbert M Lenoir,
Mark Lathrop,
Irwin Davidson,
Marie-Françoise Avril,
Florence Demenais,
Robert Ballotti,
Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets
-
Gaël A Millot,
Marcelo A Carvalho,
Sandrine M Caputo,
Maaike P G Vreeswijk,
Melissa A Brown,
Michelle Webb, Etienne Rouleau,
Susan L Neuhausen,
Thomas V O Hansen,
Alvaro Galli,
Rita D Brandão,
Marinus J Blok,
Aneliya Velkova,
Fergus J Couch,
Alvaro N A Monteiro
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 confer an estimated lifetime risk of 56-80% for breast cancer and 15-60% for ovarian cancer. Since the mid 1990s when BRCA1 was identified, genetic testing has revealed over 1,500 unique germline variants. However, for a significant number of these variants, the effect on protein function is unknown making it difficult to infer the consequences on risks of breast and ovarian cancers. Thus, many individuals undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1 mutations receive test results reporting a variant of uncertain clinical significance (VUS), leading to issues in risk assessment, counseling, and preventive care. Here, we describe functional assays for BRCA1 to directly or indirectly assess the impact of a variant on protein conformation or function and how these results can be used to complement genetic data to classify a VUS as to its clinical significance. Importantly, these methods may provide a framework for genome-wide pathogenicity assignment. Hum Mutat 33:1526-1537, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Human Mutation 07/2012; 33(11):1526-1537. · 5.69 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Drugs targeting protein kinase C (PKC) show promising therapeutic activity. However, little is known about the expression patterns of the 11 PKC genes in human tumors, and the clinical significance of most PKC genes is unknown. We used qRT-PCR assays to quantify mRNA levels of the 11 PKC genes in 458 breast tumors from patients with known clinical/pathological status and long-term outcome. The proportion of tumors in which the expression of the different genes was altered varied widely, from 9.6% for PKN2 to 40.2% for PKCι/λ. In breast tumors, overexpression was the main alteration observed for PKCι/λ (33.4%), PKCδ (29.5%) and PKCζ (9.6%), whereas underexpression was the main alteration observed for PKCα (27.3%), PKCε (11.6%), PKCη (8.7%) and PKN2 (8.1%). Both overexpression and underexpression were observed for PKCβ (underexpression 15.5%, overexpression 13.8%), PKCθ (underexpression 14.8%, overexpression 10.0%) and PKN1 (underexpression 6.6%, overexpression 7.4%). Several links were found between different PKC genes; and also between the expression patterns of PKC genes and several classical pathological and clinical parameters. PKCι/λ alone was found to have prognostic significance (p = 0.043), whereas PKCα showed a trend towards an influence on relapse-free survival (p = 0.052). PKCι/λ retained its prognostic significance in Cox multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.031). These results reveal very complex expression patterns of PKC genes in breast tumors, and suggest that their expression should be considered together when evaluating anti-tumoral drugs. PKCι/λ seems to be the most promising therapeutic target in breast cancer.
International Journal of Cancer 04/2012; 131(12):2852-62. · 5.44 Impact Factor
-
Claude Houdayer,
Virginie Caux-Moncoutier,
Sophie Krieger,
Michel Barrois,
Françoise Bonnet,
Violaine Bourdon,
Myriam Bronner,
Monique Buisson,
Florence Coulet,
Pascaline Gaildrat, [......],
Jean-Philippe Vert,
Rosette Lidereau,
Florent Soubrier,
Hagay Sobol,
Nicolas Sevenet,
Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets,
Agnès Hardouin,
Mario Tosi,
Olga M Sinilnikova,
Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Assessing the impact of variants of unknown significance (VUS) on splicing is a key issue in molecular diagnosis. This impact can be predicted by in silico tools, but proper evaluation and user guidelines are lacking. To fill this gap, we embarked upon the largest BRCA1 and BRCA2 splice study to date by testing 272 VUSs (327 analyses) within the BRCA splice network of Unicancer. All these VUSs were analyzed by using six tools (splice site prediction by neural network, splice site finder (SSF), MaxEntScan (MES), ESE finder, relative enhancer and silencer classification by unanimous enrichment, and human splicing finder) and the predictions obtained were compared with transcript analysis results. Combining MES and SSF gave 96% sensitivity and 83% specificity for VUSs occurring in the vicinity of consensus splice sites, that is, the surrounding 11 and 14 bases for the 5' and 3' sites, respectively. This study was also an opportunity to define guidelines for transcript analysis along with a tentative classification of splice variants. The guidelines drawn from this large series should be useful for the whole community, particularly in the context of growing sequencing capacities that require robust pipelines for variant interpretation.
Human Mutation 04/2012; 33(8):1228-38. · 5.69 Impact Factor
-
Jeroen R Dijkstra,
Frank J M Opdam,
Jerry Boonyaratanakornkit,
E Ralf Schönbrunner,
Mona Shahbazian,
Anders Edsjö,
Gerald Hoefler,
Andreas Jung,
Athanassios Kotsinas,
Vassilis G Gorgoulis,
Fernando López-Ríos,
Karin de Stricker, Etienne Rouleau,
Bart Biesmans,
J Han J M van Krieken
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In recent years, the mutational status of the KRAS oncogene has become incorporated into standard medical care as a predictive marker for therapeutic decisions related to patients with metastasized colorectal cancer. This is necessary, because these patients benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy with increased progression-free survival only if the tumor does not carry a mutation in KRAS. Many different analytical platforms, both those commercially available and those developed in house, have been used within pathology laboratories to assess KRAS mutational status. For a testing laboratory to become accredited to perform such tests, it is essential that they perform reliability testing, but it has not previously been possible to perform this kind of testing on the complete workflow on a large scale without compromising reproducibility or the mimicry of the control sample. We assessed a novel synthetic control for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples in a blind study conducted within nine laboratories across Europe. We show that FFPE material can, at least in part, mimic clinical samples and we demonstrate this control to be a valuable tool in the assessment of platforms used in testing for KRAS mutational status.
The Journal of molecular diagnostics: JMD 03/2012; 14(3):187-91. · 3.48 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Approximately 5 to 10 % of all ovarian cancers arise in the setting of a major genetic predisposition. The two main hereditary forms of ovarian adenocarcinomas are the hereditary breast/ovarian cancers associated with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation and the Lynch syndrome associated with a MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2 gene mutation. Their identification and the characterization of a causative germline mutation are crucial and have a major impact for affected women and their relatives in terms of medical management. The aim of this review is to indicate cancer risks associated with these two entities, to evaluate their contribution in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancers and to indicate the clinical data suggestive of these diagnoses, the validated indications for genetic analyses and the current management guidelines. We will also illustrate the diagnostic strategy by reporting a clinical observation.
Bulletin du cancer 02/2012; 99(4):453-62. · 0.67 Impact Factor
-
Kevin Cheeseman, Etienne Rouleau,
Anne Vannier,
Aurélie Thomas,
Adrien Briaux,
Cedrick Lefol,
Pierre Walrafen,
Aaron Bensimon,
Rosette Lidereau,
Emmanuel Conseiller,
Maurizio Ceppi
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are involved in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. About 2 to 4% of breast cancer patients with positive family history, negative for point mutations, can be expected to carry large rearrangements in one of these two genes. We developed a novel diagnostic genetic test for the physical mapping of large rearrangements, based on molecular combing (MC), a FISH-based technique for direct visualization of single DNA molecules at high resolution. We designed specific Genomic Morse Codes (GMCs), covering the exons, the noncoding regions, and large genomic portions flanking both genes. We validated our approach by testing 10 index cases with positive family history of breast cancer and 50 negative controls. Large rearrangements, corresponding to deletions and duplications with sizes ranging from 3 to 40 kb, were detected and characterized on both genes, including four novel mutations. The nature of all the identified mutations was confirmed by high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and breakpoints characterized by sequencing. The developed GMCs allowed to localize several tandem repeat duplications on both genes. We propose the developed genetic test as a valuable tool to screen large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 to be combined in clinical settings with an assay capable of detecting small mutations.
Human Mutation 02/2012; 33(6):998-1009. · 5.69 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the two main genes responsible for predisposition to breast and ovarian cancers, as a result of protein-inactivating monoallelic mutations. It remains to be established whether many of the variants identified in these two genes, so-called unclassified/unknown variants (UVs), contribute to the disease phenotype or are simply neutral variants (or polymorphisms). Given the clinical importance of establishing their status, a nationwide effort to annotate these UVs was launched by laboratories belonging to the French GGC consortium (Groupe Génétique et Cancer), leading to the creation of the UMD-BRCA1/BRCA2 databases (http://www.umd.be/BRCA1/ and http://www.umd.be/BRCA2/). These databases have been endorsed by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) and are designed to collect all variants detected in France, whether causal, neutral or UV. They differ from other BRCA databases in that they contain co-occurrence data for all variants. Using these data, the GGC French consortium has been able to classify certain UVs also contained in other databases. In this article, we report some novel UVs not contained in the BIC database and explore their impact in cancer predisposition based on a structural approach.
Nucleic Acids Research 12/2011; 40(Database issue):D992-1002. · 8.03 Impact Factor
-
Corine Bertolotto,
Fabienne Lesueur,
Sandy Giuliano,
Thomas Strub,
Mahaut de Lichy,
Karine Bille,
Philippe Dessen,
Benoit d'Hayer,
Hamida Mohamdi,
Audrey Remenieras, [......],
Laurence Venat-Bouvet,
Hélène Zattara,
Valérie Chaudru,
Gilbert M Lenoir,
Mark Lathrop,
Irwin Davidson,
Marie-Françoise Avril,
Florence Demenais,
Robert Ballotti,
Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: So far, no common environmental and/or phenotypic factor has been associated with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The known risk factors for melanoma include sun exposure, pigmentation and nevus phenotypes; risk factors associated with RCC include smoking, obesity and hypertension. A recent study of coexisting melanoma and RCC in the same patients supports a genetic predisposition underlying the association between these two cancers. The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) has been proposed to act as a melanoma oncogene; it also stimulates the transcription of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF1A), the pathway of which is targeted by kidney cancer susceptibility genes. We therefore proposed that MITF might have a role in conferring a genetic predisposition to co-occurring melanoma and RCC. Here we identify a germline missense substitution in MITF (Mi-E318K) that occurred at a significantly higher frequency in genetically enriched patients affected with melanoma, RCC or both cancers, when compared with controls. Overall, Mi-E318K carriers had a higher than fivefold increased risk of developing melanoma, RCC or both cancers. Codon 318 is located in a small-ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) consensus site (ΨKXE) and Mi-E318K severely impaired SUMOylation of MITF. Mi-E318K enhanced MITF protein binding to the HIF1A promoter and increased its transcriptional activity compared to wild-type MITF. Further, we observed a global increase in Mi-E318K-occupied loci. In an RCC cell line, gene expression profiling identified a Mi-E318K signature related to cell growth, proliferation and inflammation. Lastly, the mutant protein enhanced melanocytic and renal cell clonogenicity, migration and invasion, consistent with a gain-of-function role in tumorigenesis. Our data provide insights into the link between SUMOylation, transcription and cancer.
Nature 12/2011; 480(7375):94-8. · 36.28 Impact Factor
-
Danièle Muller, Etienne Rouleau,
Inès Schultz,
Sandrine Caputo,
Cédrick Lefol,
Ivan Bièche,
Olivier Caron,
Catherine Noguès,
Jean Marc Limacher,
Liliane Demange,
Rosette Lidereau,
Jean Pierre Fricker,
Joseph Abecassis
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are major contributors to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Large rearrangements are less frequent in the BRCA2 gene than in BRCA1. We report, here, the first total deletion of exon 3 in the BRCA2 gene that was detected during screening of 2058 index cases from breast/ovarian cancer families for BRCA2 large rearrangements. Deletion of exon 3, which is in phase, does not alter the reading frame. Low levels of alternative transcripts lacking exon 3 (Δ3 delta3 transcript) have been reported in normal tissues, which raises the question whether deletion of exon 3 is pathogenic.
Large BRCA2 rearrangements were analysed by QMPSF (Quantitative Multiplex PCR of Short Fluorescent Fragments) or MLPA (Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification). The exon 3 deletion was characterized with a "zoom-in" dedicated CGH array to the BRCA2 gene and sequencing. To determine the effect of exon 3 deletion and assess its pathogenic effect, three methods of transcript quantification were used: fragment analysis of FAM-labelled PCR products, specific allelic expression using an intron 2 polymorphism and competitive quantitative RT-PCR.
Large rearrangements of BRCA2 were detected in six index cases out of 2058 tested (3% of all deleterious BRCA2 mutations). This study reports the first large rearrangement of the BRCA2 gene that includes all of exon 3 and leads to an in frame deletion of exon 3 at the transcriptional level. Thirty five variants in exon 3 and junction regions of BRCA2 are also reported, that contribute to the interpretation of the pathogenicity of the deletion. The quantitative approaches showed that there are three classes of delta3 BRCA2 transcripts (low, moderate and exclusive). Exclusive expression of the delta3 transcript by the mutant allele and segregation data provide evidence for a causal effect of the exon 3 deletion.
This paper highlights that large rearrangements and total deletion of exon 3 in the BRCA2 gene could contribute to hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. In addition, our findings suggest that, to interpret the pathogenic effect of any variants of exon 3, both accurate transcript quantification and co-segregation analysis are required.
BMC Medical Genetics 09/2011; 12:121. · 2.33 Impact Factor
-
Antonis C Antoniou,
Christiana Kartsonaki,
Olga M Sinilnikova,
Penny Soucy,
Lesley McGuffog,
Sue Healey,
Andrew Lee,
Paolo Peterlongo,
Siranoush Manoukian,
Bernard Peissel, [......],
Amanda B Spurdle,
Susan L Neuhausen,
Yuan Chun Ding,
Zachary Fredericksen,
Xianshu Wang,
Vernon S Pankratz,
Fergus Couch,
Jacques Simard,
Douglas F Easton,
Georgia Chenevix-Trench
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 6q25.1, near the ESR1 gene, have been implicated in the susceptibility to breast cancer for Asian (rs2046210) and European women (rs9397435). A genome-wide association study in Europeans identified two further breast cancer susceptibility variants: rs11249433 at 1p11.2 and rs999737 in RAD51L1 at 14q24.1. Although previously identified breast cancer susceptibility variants have been shown to be associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, the involvement of these SNPs to breast cancer susceptibility in mutation carriers is currently unknown. To address this, we genotyped these SNPs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers from 42 studies from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2. In the analysis of 14 123 BRCA1 and 8053 BRCA2 mutation carriers of European ancestry, the 6q25.1 SNPs (r(2) = 0.14) were independently associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 mutation carriers [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.23, P-trend = 4.5 × 10(-9) for rs2046210; HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.18-1.40, P-trend = 1.3 × 10(-8) for rs9397435], but only rs9397435 was associated with the risk for BRCA2 carriers (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.28, P-trend = 0.031). SNP rs11249433 (1p11.2) was associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.17, P-trend = 0.015), but was not associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.02, P-trend = 0.20). SNP rs999737 (RAD51L1) was not associated with breast cancer risk for either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (P-trend = 0.27 and 0.30, respectively). The identification of SNPs at 6q25.1 associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers will lead to a better understanding of the biology of tumour development in these women.
Human Molecular Genetics 06/2011; 20(16):3304-21. · 7.64 Impact Factor
-
Ana Peixoto,
Catarina Santos,
Manuela Pinheiro,
Pedro Pinto,
Maria José Soares,
Patrícia Rocha,
Leonor Gusmão,
António Amorim,
Annemarie van der Hout,
Anne-Marie Gerdes, [......],
Alberto Gulino,
Maria I Achatz,
Dirce M Carraro,
Brigitte Bressac de Paillerets,
Audrey Remenieras,
Cindy Benson,
Silvia Casadei,
Mary-Claire King,
Erik Teugels,
Manuel R Teixeira
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The c.156_157insAlu BRCA2 mutation has so far only been reported in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) families of Portuguese origin. Since this mutation is not detectable using the commonly used screening methodologies and must be specifically sought, we screened for this rearrangement in a total of 5,443 suspected HBOC families from several countries. Whereas the c.156_157insAlu BRCA2 mutation was detected in 11 of 149 suspected HBOC families from Portugal, representing 37.9% of all deleterious mutations, in other countries it was detected only in one proband living in France and in four individuals requesting predictive testing living in France and in the USA, all being Portuguese immigrants. After performing an extensive haplotype study in carrier families, we estimate that this founder mutation occurred 558 ± 215 years ago. We further demonstrate significant quantitative differences regarding the production of the BRCA2 full length RNA and the transcript lacking exon 3 in c.156_157insAlu BRCA2 mutation carriers and in controls. The cumulative incidence of breast cancer in carriers did not differ from that of other BRCA2 and BRCA1 pathogenic mutations. We recommend that all suspected HBOC families from Portugal or with Portuguese ancestry are specifically tested for this rearrangement.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 06/2011; 127(3):671-9. · 4.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 gene strongly predispose women to breast cancer (lifetime risk up to 80%). Furthermore, the BRCA1 protein is absent or present at very low levels in about one third of sporadic breast cancers. However, the mechanisms underlying BRCA1 somatic inactivation appear multiple and are still not fully understood. We report here the involvement of miR-146a and miR-146b-5p that bind to the same site in the 3′UTR of BRCA1 and down-regulate its expression as demonstrated using reporter assays. This was further confirmed with the endogenous BRCA1 gene by transfecting microRNA (miRNA) precursors or inhibitors in mammary cell lines. This down-regulation was accompanied by an increased proliferation and a reduced homologous recombination rate, two processes controlled by BRCA1. Furthermore, we showed that the highest levels of miR-146a and/or miR-146b-5p are found in basal-like mammary tumour epithelial cell lines and in triple negative breast tumours, which are the closest to tumours arising in carriers of BRCA1 mutations. This work provides further evidence for the involvement of miRNAs in sporadic breast cancer through down-regulation of BRCA1.
EMBO Molecular Medicine 04/2011; 3(5):279 - 290. · 10.33 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 gene strongly predispose women to breast cancer (lifetime risk up to 80%). Furthermore, the BRCA1 protein is absent or present at very low levels in about one third of sporadic breast cancers. However, the mechanisms underlying BRCA1 somatic inactivation appear multiple and are still not fully understood. We report here the involvement of miR-146a and miR-146b-5p that bind to the same site in the 3'UTR of BRCA1 and down-regulate its expression as demonstrated using reporter assays. This was further confirmed with the endogenous BRCA1 gene by transfecting microRNA (miRNA) precursors or inhibitors in mammary cell lines. This down-regulation was accompanied by an increased proliferation and a reduced homologous recombination rate, two processes controlled by BRCA1. Furthermore, we showed that the highest levels of miR-146a and/or miR-146b-5p are found in basal-like mammary tumour epithelial cell lines and in triple negative breast tumours, which are the closest to tumours arising in carriers of BRCA1 mutations. This work provides further evidence for the involvement of miRNAs in sporadic breast cancer through down-regulation of BRCA1.
EMBO Molecular Medicine 04/2011; 3(5):279-90. · 10.33 Impact Factor
-
Ivan Bièche,
Sophie Vacher,
François Lallemand,
Sengül Tozlu-Kara,
Hind Bennani,
Michèle Beuzelin,
Keltouma Driouch, Etienne Rouleau,
Florence Lerebours,
Hugues Ripoche,
Géraldine Cizeron-Clairac,
Frédérique Spyratos,
Rosette Lidereau
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability (CIN) are common abnormalities in human cancer. Alterations of the mitotic spindle checkpoint are likely to contribute to these phenotypes, but little is known about somatic alterations of mitotic spindle checkpoint genes in breast cancer.
To obtain further insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying aneuploidy in breast cancer, we used real-time quantitative RT-PCR to quantify the mRNA expression of 76 selected mitotic spindle checkpoint genes in a large panel of breast tumor samples.
The expression of 49 (64.5%) of the 76 genes was significantly dysregulated in breast tumors compared to normal breast tissues: 40 genes were upregulated and 9 were downregulated. Most of these changes in gene expression during malignant transformation were observed in epithelial cells.Alterations of nine of these genes, and particularly NDC80, were also detected in benign breast tumors, indicating that they may be involved in pre-neoplastic processes.We also identified a two-gene expression signature (PLK1 + AURKA) which discriminated between DNA aneuploid and DNA diploid breast tumor samples. Interestingly, some DNA tetraploid tumor samples failed to cluster with DNA aneuploid breast tumors.
This study confirms the importance of previously characterized genes and identifies novel candidate genes that could be activated for aneuploidy to occur. Further functional analyses are required to clearly confirm the role of these new identified genes in the molecular mechanisms involved in breast cancer aneuploidy. The novel genes identified here, and/or the two-gene expression signature, might serve as diagnostic or prognostic markers and form the basis for novel therapeutic strategies.
Molecular Cancer 02/2011; 10:23. · 3.99 Impact Factor
