-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We assessed the risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program, which enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and a broad range of ejection fractions (EFs).
Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of adverse CV outcomes in patients with CHF and reduced EF. The risk of AF in patients with CHF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (PEF) is unknown.
A total of 7,599 patients with symptomatic CHF were randomized to candesartan or placebo. Patients were divided by baseline EF (< or =40% or >40%) in low or preserved EF groups. Major outcomes were cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Median follow-up was 37.7 months.
A total of 670 (17%) patients in the low EF group and 478 (19%) in the PEF group had AF at baseline. Atrial fibrillation predicted a high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality regardless of baseline EF. Patients with AF and low EF had the highest absolute risk for adverse CV outcomes. However, AF was associated with greater relative increased risk of the major outcomes in patients with PEF than in patients with low EF: hazard ratio 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45 to 2.06) versus 1.29 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.46), respectively. The same was true for the risk of all-cause mortality. Candesartan was associated with similar treatment effects regardless of baseline rhythm.
Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of CV outcomes in patients with CHF and either reduced EF or PEF. Candesartan improved outcomes similarly regardless of baseline rhythm.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 05/2006; 47(10):1997-2004. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Patient and physician preferences as well as cost favor an increasingly higher threshold for hospital admission for heart failure (HF) treatment. This trend risks masking the severity and prevalence of HF as hospitalization for HF may decrease.
Heart Failure Score (HFS) has 4 ordinal subscales assessing (1) HF symptoms, physical signs of left (2) and (3) right HF, and (4) therapy changes for HF. Heart Failure Score was calculated for 1257 of 2010 (63%) patients enrolled in the MOST trial in sinus node dysfunction, who survived and had complete first-year HFS data at 4 postpacemaker implant visits (1, 3, 6, and 12 months). Heart Failure Score was summed and ranged from 0 to 14, with lower scores representing less HF.
There were 1257 patients (median age 74 years [interquartile range 68-79], 47% were women, 61% had hypertension, 20%, diabetes mellitus, and 23%, prior myocardial infarction). The median HFS accumulated during 1 year was 4 (interquartile range 1-8). Of patients with a benign first year, those with a higher HFS were more likely to die during subsequent follow-up compared with patients with lower HFS (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10 for each 1-point increase, P < .001).
Increasing HFS is associated with an increased risk of mortality in mostly elderly patients without pre-existing HF. Heart Failure Score may be a useful surrogate HF end point for clinical trials.
American heart journal 04/2006; 151(3):699-705. · 4.65 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abnormal large artery function and increased pulsatile load are exacerbated by excess angiotensin-II acting through the AT1 receptor and contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of chronic heart failure (CHF).
To evaluate effects of the AT1 receptor blocker candesartan (N = 30) or placebo (N = 34) on pulsatile hemodynamics in participants with CHF in the CHARM program.
Noninvasive hemodynamics were assessed following 6 and 14 months of treatment and averaged. Using calibrated tonometry and aortic outflow Doppler, characteristic impedance was calculated as the ratio of the change in carotid pressure and aortic flow in early systole. Total arterial compliance was calculated by the diastolic area method. Brachial blood pressure, cardiac output and peripheral resistance did not differ between groups. Lower central pulse pressure in the candesartan group (57+/-20 vs. 67+/-17 mmHg, P = 0.043) was accompanied by lower characteristic impedance (200+/-78 vs. 240+/-74 dyne s/cm5, P = 0.039) and higher total arterial compliance (1.87+/-0.70 vs. 1.47+/-0.48 ml/mmHg, P = 0.008). Similar favorable differences were seen when analyses were stratified for ejection fraction (< or = 0.40 vs. >0.40) and baseline angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use.
Candesartan has a favorable effect on large artery function in patients with chronic heart failure.
European Journal of Heart Failure 03/2006; 8(2):191-7. · 4.90 Impact Factor
-
Eileen O'Meara,
Tim Clayton,
Margaret B McEntegart,
John J V McMurray,
Chim C Lang,
Simon D Roger,
James B Young,
Scott D Solomon,
Christopher B Granger,
Jan Ostergren,
Bertil Olofsson,
Eric L Michelson,
Stuart Pocock,
Salim Yusuf,
Karl Swedberg, Marc A Pfeffer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We wished to determine the prevalence of, potential mechanistic associations of, and clinical outcomes related to anemia in patients with heart failure and a broad spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
In multivariable analyses, we examined the associations between hemoglobin and baseline characteristics, laboratory variables, and outcomes in 2653 patients randomized in the CHARM Program in the United States and Canada. Anemia was equally common in patients with preserved (27%) and reduced (25%) LVEF but was more common in black and older patients. Anemia was associated with ethnicity, diabetes, low body mass index, higher systolic and lower diastolic blood pressure, and recent heart failure hospitalization. More than 50% of anemic patients had a glomerular filtration rate <60 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(-2) compared with <30% of nonanemic patients. Despite an inverse relationship between hemoglobin and LVEF, anemia was associated with an increased risk of death and hospitalization, a relationship observed in patients with both reduced and preserved LVEF. There were 133 versus 69 deaths and 527 versus 352 hospitalizations per 1000 patient-years of follow-up in anemic versus nonanemic patients (both P<0.001). The effect of candesartan in reducing outcomes was independent of hemoglobin.
Anemia was common in heart failure, regardless of LVEF. Lower hemoglobin was associated with higher LVEF yet was an independent predictor of adverse mortality and morbidity outcomes. In heart failure, the causes of anemia and the associations between anemia and outcomes are probably multiple and complex.
Circulation 02/2006; 113(7):986-94. · 14.74 Impact Factor
-
Hans L Hillege,
Dorothea Nitsch, Marc A Pfeffer,
Karl Swedberg,
John J V McMurray,
Salim Yusuf,
Christopher B Granger,
Eric L Michelson,
Jan Ostergren,
Jan Hein Cornel,
Dick de Zeeuw,
Stuart Pocock,
Dirk J van Veldhuisen
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Decreased renal function has been found to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with markedly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the prognostic importance of renal function in a broader spectrum of patients with CHF.
The Candesartan in Heart Failure:Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program consisted of three component trials that enrolled patients with symptomatic CHF, based on use of ACE inhibitors and reduced (< or =40%) or preserved LVEF (>40%). Entry baseline creatinine was required to be below 3.0 mg/dL (265 micromol/L). Routine baseline serum creatinine assessments were done in 2680 North American patients. An analysis of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and LVEF on risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, as well as on all-cause mortality, was conducted on these 2680 patients. The proportion of patients with eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 was 36.0%; 42.6% for CHARM-Alternative, 33.0% for CHARM-Added, and 34.7% for CHARM-Preserved. During the median follow-up of 34.4 months (total 6493 person-years), the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening CHF occurred in 950 of 2680 subjects. Both reduced eGFR and lower LVEF were found to be significant independent predictors of worse outcome after adjustment for major confounding baseline clinical characteristics. The risk for cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening CHF as well as the risk for all-cause mortality increased significantly below an eGFR of 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.54 for 45 to 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and 1.86 for <45 mL/min per 1.73 m2 for the primary outcome, both P<0.001, and hazard ratio of 1.50, P=0.006, and 1.91, P=0.001, respectively, for all-cause mortality). The prognostic value of eGFR was not significantly different among the three component trials. There was no significant interaction between renal function, the effect of candesartan, and clinical outcome.
Impaired renal function is independently associated with heightened risk for death, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with CHF with both preserved as well as reduced LVEF. There was no evidence that the beneficial effect of candesartan was modified by baseline eGFR.
Circulation 02/2006; 113(5):671-8. · 14.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Myocardial performance index (MPI) is a noninvasive, quantitative Doppler measure of global cardiac function, integrating systolic and diastolic functions. The prognostic significance of MPI is less clear for cardiovascular (CV) events after myocardial infarction (MI) among individuals at high risk with depressed left ventricular (LV) systolic function.
We analyzed echocardiograms from 512 patients with depressed LV function after MI enrolled in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) echocardiographic substudy. Baseline MPI measures were obtainable in 226 patients. The cohort was separated by median MPI (0.50). MPI was related to baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, ventricular remodeling, and subsequent CV events, including recurrent MI, heart failure, CV death, and a composite of all CV end points.
An MPI of 0.5 or more was associated with larger infarct size and reduced LV systolic function at baseline; other baseline characteristics between the groups were similar. A total of 64 (28.3%) patients experienced CV events. Baseline MPI did not influence ventricular remodeling and did not modify the relationship between ventricular dilatation and CV events. After covariate adjustment, an MPI of 0.50 or higher remained an independent predictor for adverse CV events (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.17-3.43).
An MPI of 0.50 or greater is an independent predictor for CV events after MI in patients with known LV dysfunction.
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 02/2006; 19(1):28-33. · 2.98 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We aimed to develop prognostic models for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).
We evaluated data from 7599 patients in the CHARM programme with CHF with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Multi-variable Cox regression models were developed using baseline candidate variables to predict all-cause mortality (n=1831 deaths) and the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (n=2460 patients with events). Final models included 21 predictor variables for CV death/HF hospitalization and for death. The three most powerful predictors were older age (beginning >60 years), diabetes, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (beginning <45%). Other independent predictors that increased risk included higher NYHA class, cardiomegaly, prior HF hospitalization, male sex, lower body mass index, and lower diastolic blood pressure. The model accurately stratified actual 2-year mortality from 2.5 to 44% for the lowest to highest deciles of predicted risk.
In a large contemporary CHF population, including patients with preserved and decreased left ventricular systolic function, routine clinical variables can discriminate risk regardless of EF. Diabetes was found to be a surprisingly strong independent predictor. These models can stratify risk and help define how patient characteristics relate to clinical course.
European Heart Journal 01/2006; 27(1):65-75. · 10.48 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is an important cause of hospital admission and death. Poor adherence to medication is common in some chronic illnesses and might reduce the population effectiveness of proven treatments. Because little is known about adherence in patients with CHF and about the consequences of non-adherence, we assessed the association between adherence and clinical outcome in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) programme.
CHARM was a double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial, comparing the effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan with placebo in 7599 patients with CHF. Median follow-up was 38 months. The proportion of time patients took more than 80% of their study medication was defined as good adherence and 80% or less as poor adherence. We used a Cox proportional hazards regression model, with adherence as a time-dependent covariate in the model, to examine the association between adherence and mortality in the candesartan and placebo groups.
We excluded 187 patients because of missing information on adherence. In the time-dependent Cox regression model, after adjustment for predictive factors (demographics, physiological and severity-of-illness variables, smoking history, and number of concomitant medications), good adherence was associated with lower all-cause mortality in all patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.57-0.75, p<0.0001). The adjusted HR for good adherence was similar in the candesartan (0.66, 0.55-0.81, p<0.0001) and placebo (0.64, 0.53-0.78, p<0.0001) groups.
Good adherence to medication is associated with a lower risk of death than poor adherence in patients with CHF, irrespective of assigned treatment. This finding suggests that adherence is a marker for adherence to effective treatments other than study medications, or to other adherence behaviours that affect outcome. Understanding these factors could provide an opportunity for new interventions, including those aimed at improving adherence.
The Lancet 01/2006; 366(9502):2005-11. · 38.28 Impact Factor
-
Scott D Solomon,
Nagesh Anavekar,
Hicham Skali,
John J V McMurray,
Karl Swedberg,
Salim Yusuf,
Christopher B Granger,
Eric L Michelson,
Duolao Wang,
Stuart Pocock, Marc A Pfeffer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Left ventricular function is a principal determinant of cardiovascular risk in patients with heart failure. The growing number of patients with preserved systolic function heart failure underscores the importance of understanding the relationship between ejection fraction and risk.
We studied 7599 patients with a broad spectrum of symptomatic heart failure enrolled in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program. All patients were randomized to candesartan at a target dose of 32 mg once daily or matching placebo and followed up for a median of 38 months. We related left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), measured before randomization at the sites, to cardiovascular outcomes and causes of death. Mean LVEF in patients enrolled in CHARM was 38.8+/-14.9% (median LVEF 36%). Patients with lower LVEF tended to have higher baseline New York Heart Association class. The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality increased by 39% for every 10% reduction in ejection fraction below 45% (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.46), with adjustment for baseline covariates. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and all components of cardiovascular death declined with increasing ejection fraction until an ejection fraction of 45%, after which the risk of these outcomes remained relatively stable with increasing LVEF. The absolute change in rate per 100 patient-years for each 10% reduction in LVEF was greatest for sudden death and heart failure-related death. The effect of candesartan in reducing cardiovascular outcomes was consistent across LVEF categories.
LVEF is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular outcome in heart failure patients across a broad spectrum of ventricular function. Nevertheless, once elevated to a range above 45%, ejection fraction does not further contribute to assessment of cardiovascular risk in heart failure patients.
Circulation 01/2006; 112(24):3738-44. · 14.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of achieving very low calculated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels with intensive statin therapy.
Intensive statin therapy reduces clinical events occurring after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and may result in LDL levels markedly lower than guideline levels. Prior epidemiologic and preclinical studies raise concerns about the safety of very low cholesterol levels.
The Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) study compared intensive therapy (atorvastatin, 80 mg) and moderate therapy (pravastatin, 40 mg) in patients after ACS. Patients treated with atorvastatin were divided by four-month LDL values into groups: >100, >80 to 100 (reference-range-meeting guidelines), >60 to 80, >40 to 60, and <40 mg/dl. Baseline, clinical, and safety data were compared among groups achieving guideline recommendation levels or lower.
Among 1,825 patients with four-month LDL, 91% were at goal (<100 mg/dl). The distribution was >80 to 100 mg/dl (14%), >60 to 80 mg/dl (31%), >40 to 60 mg/dl (34%), and <40 mg/dl (11%). Those with lower LDL levels were more often male, older, and diabetic, and had lower baseline LDL levels. They had prior statin therapy and fewer prior myocardial infarctions (MI). There were no significant differences in safety parameters, including muscle, liver, or retinal abnormalities, intracranial hemorrhage, or death, in the very low LDL groups. The <40 mg/dl and 40 to 60 mg/dl groups had fewer major cardiac events (death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia, revascularization).
Compared with patients treated with an accepted LDL goal (80 to 100 mg/dl), there was no adverse effect on safety with lower achieved LDL levels, and apparent improved clinical efficacy. These data identify no intrinsic safety concern of achieving low LDL and, therefore, a strategy of intensive treatment need not be altered in patients achieving very low LDL levels.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 11/2005; 46(8):1411-6. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
Karolina E Szummer,
Scott D Solomon,
Eric J Velazquez,
Rakhi Kilaru,
John McMurray,
Jean-Lucien Rouleau,
Kenneth W Mahaffey,
Aldo P Maggioni,
Robert M Califf, Marc A Pfeffer,
Harvey D White
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We sought to assess the relative contribution of heart failure (HF) on admission for an acute myocardial infarction (MI) to the subsequent in-hospital stroke risk.
The VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion (VALIANT) registry enrolled 5573 consecutive MI patients at 84 international sites from 1999 to 2001. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for stroke and adjusted for baseline characteristics, Killip Class, and risk factors for stroke, such as diabetes and prior HF. In-hospital stroke occurred in 81 (1.5%) patients. HF was present on admission in 38% of patients who developed a stroke and in 24% who did not (P=0.001). Older age (OR 1.03 increase/year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.04), Killip Class III (OR 1.66, CI 0.86-3.19) or IV (OR 4.85, CI 1.69-13.93), history of hypertension (OR 1.73, CI 1.06-2.82), and history of stroke (OR 1.89, CI 1.06-3.37) were more common in patients who had in-hospital stroke. In-hospital mortality in patients with and without stroke was 27.2 and 6.5%, respectively (P<0.001).
Patients with stroke after MI have a dismal prognosis. The presence of HF on admission for an acute MI increases in-hospital stroke risk. HF treatments may modify the risk of stroke.
European Heart Journal 11/2005; 26(20):2114-9. · 10.48 Impact Factor
-
Catherine Demers,
John J V McMurray,
Karl Swedberg, Marc A Pfeffer,
Christopher B Granger,
Bertil Olofsson,
Robert S McKelvie,
Jan Ostergren,
Eric L Michelson,
Peter A Johansson,
Duolao Wang,
Salim Yusuf
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), but it is not known whether angiotensin receptor blockers have the same effect.
To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on MI and other coronary events in patients with heart failure.
The Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program, a randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolling patients (mean age, 66 [SD, 11] years) with New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms who were randomly allocated to receive candesartan (target dose, 32 mg once daily) or matching placebo given in addition to optimal therapy for heart failure. Patients were enrolled from March 1999 through March 2001. Of 7599 patients allocated, 4004 (53%) had experienced a previous MI, and 1808 (24%) currently had angina. At baseline, 3125 (41%) were receiving an ACE inhibitor; 4203 (55%), a beta-blocker; 3153 (42%), a lipid-lowering drug; 4246 (56%), aspirin; and 6286 (83%), a diuretic.
The primary outcome of the present analysis was the composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI in patients with heart failure receiving candesartan or placebo.
During the median follow-up of 37.7 months, the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI was significantly reduced in the candesartan group (775 patients [20.4%]) vs the placebo group (868 [22.9%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96; P = .004; number needed to treat [NNT], 40). Nonfatal MI alone was also significantly reduced in the candesartan group (116 [3.1%]) vs the placebo group (148 [3.9%]) (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98; P = .03; NNT, 118). The secondary outcome of fatal MI, sudden death, or nonfatal MI was significantly reduced with candesartan (459 [12.1%]) vs placebo (522 [13.8%]) (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97; P = .02; NNT, 59). Risk reductions in cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI were similar across predetermined subgroups and the component CHARM trials. There was no impact on hospitalizations for unstable angina or coronary revascularization procedures with candesartan.
In patients with heart failure, candesartan significantly reduces the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 11/2005; 294(14):1794-8. · 30.03 Impact Factor
-
Harvey D White,
Philip E G Aylward,
Zhen Huang,
Anthony J Dalby,
W Douglas Weaver,
Ståle Barvik,
José Antonio Marin-Neto,
Jan Murin,
Rolf O Nordlander,
Wiek H van Gilst,
Faiez Zannad,
John J V McMurray,
Robert M Califf, Marc A Pfeffer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The elderly constitute an increasing proportion of acute myocardial infarction patients and have disproportionately high mortality and morbidity. Those with heart failure or impaired left ventricular left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction have high complication and mortality rates. Little is known about outcomes with contemporary therapies in these patients.
The Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT) randomized 14,703 patients with heart failure and/or left ventricular ejection fraction <40% to receive captopril, valsartan, or both. Mortality and a composite end point, including cardiovascular mortality, readmission for heart failure, reinfarction, stroke, and resuscitated cardiac arrest, were compared for the age groups of <65 (n=6988), 65 to 74 (n=4555), 75 to 84 (n=2777), and > or =85 (n=383) years. With increasing age, 3-year mortality almost quadrupled (13.4%, 26.3%, 36.0%, and 52.1%, respectively), composite end-point events more than doubled (25.2%, 41.0%, 52.3%, and 66.8%), and hospital admissions for heart failure almost tripled (12.0%, 23.1%, 31.3%, and 35.4%). Outcomes did not differ between the 3 study treatments in any age group. Adverse events associated with captopril and valsartan were more common in the elderly and in patients receiving combination therapy. With increasing age, use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and statins declined, and use of digoxin, calcium-channel blockers, and non-potassium-sparing diuretics increased. On 3-year multivariable analysis, each 10-year age increase was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.49 (95% CI, 1.426 to 1.557; P<0.0001) for mortality and an odds ratio of 1.38 (95% CI, 1.31 to 1.46; P<0.0001) for readmission with heart failure.
Outcomes remained poor in elderly patients with heart failure and/or impaired left ventricular systolic function after acute myocardial infarction, although most received beta-blockers and all received an ACE inhibitor and/or an angiotensin receptor blocker. Better therapies and increased use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and statins are needed in this important and increasing patient group.
Circulation 11/2005; 112(22):3391-9. · 14.74 Impact Factor
-
Adrian F Hernandez,
Eric J Velazquez,
Scott D Solomon,
Rakhi Kilaru,
Rafael Diaz,
Christopher M O'Connor,
George Ertl,
Aldo P Maggioni,
Jean-Lucien Rouleau,
Wiek van Gilst, Marc A Pfeffer,
Robert M Califf
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: How often echocardiography and cardiac catheterization are used to evaluate left ventricular (LV) function in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and how they are associated with quality of care is unknown.
Patients with MI in the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VALIANT) registry were divided into those with (n = 1423) and without (n = 3968) heart failure (HF), and the use of either echocardiography or cardiac catheterization for LV assessment in each group was compared along with associated baseline characteristics. We evaluated the association between LV assessment and discharge medications. Using a multivariable model with a propensity analysis, we evaluated the association of LV assessment with in-hospital outcomes.
Of the patients with HF, 322 (22.6%) had no LV assessment. Patients with HF with LV assessment were discharged more frequently under treatment with aspirin (81.3% vs 70.0%; P<.001), beta-blockers (65.6% vs 56.4%; P = .008), clopidogrel (30.4% vs 14.0%; P<.001), and statins (45.9% vs 34.2%; P<.001). Patients without HF who underwent LV assessment were discharged more frequently under treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (53.8% vs 41.5%; P<.001). After adjustment for regional use, other covariates, and revascularization, LV assessment was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with HF (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.45; P<.001) and in patients without HF (adjusted OR, 0.30; P<.001). After excluding deaths during the first 2 days, LV assessment remained associated with lower mortality in patients with HF (adjusted OR, 0.59; P = .03) and in patients without HF (adjusted OR, 0.41; P<.001).
Left ventricular assessment was frequently not performed during the in-hospital stay of patients with acute MI, including those with clinical HF, and its use was associated with better quality of care.
Archives of Internal Medicine 10/2005; 165(18):2162-9. · 11.46 Impact Factor
-
Hicham Skali,
Leonardo A M Zornoff, Marc A Pfeffer,
Malcolm O Arnold,
Gervasio A Lamas,
Lemuel A Moyé,
Ted Plappert,
Jean L Rouleau,
Bruce A Sussex,
Martin St John Sutton,
Eugene Braunwald,
Scott D Solomon
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function are known predictors of morbidity and mortality after an acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, the prognostic use of a late evaluation of cardiac function after an MI remains unclear.
We analyzed echocardiograms obtained 1 year after MI in patients with LV dysfunction at baseline (ejection fraction [EF] < or = 40%) from 291 patients enrolled in the SAVE echocardiographic substudy who did not develop heart failure (HF) or a recurrent MI during this first year. Left ventricular EF and RV fractional area change were assessed.
After a median follow-up of 22 months after the 1-year echocardiogram, a low LVEF (< 30%) at 1 year was associated with an increased risk of death and/or HF (hazards ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.3). Presence of RV dysfunction was also associated with an increased risk of death (HR 8.9, 95% CI 3.5-22.1), development of HF (HR 7.1, 95% CI 3.4-15.0), and the composite end point of death or HF (HR 7.6, 95% CI 4.1-14.2). In multivariate analyses, both low LVEF and RV dysfunction remained independently predictive of the composite end point of death or HF. Patients with biventricular dysfunction were at the greatest risk of death and/or HF (HR 19.4, 95% CI 8.2-46.0) in follow-up.
In a stable population of survivors of MI, impaired LV and RV function at 1 year after MI are independently and additively predictive of increased risk of HF or death.
American heart journal 10/2005; 150(4):743-9. · 4.65 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of achieving very low calculated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels with intensive statin therapy. BACKGROUND: Intensive statin therapy reduces clinical events occurring after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and may result in LDL levels markedly lower than guideline levels. Prior epidemiologic and preclinical studies raise concerns about the safety of very low cholesterol levels. METHODS: The Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) study compared intensive therapy (atorvastatin, 80 mg) and moderate therapy (pravastatin, 40 mg) in patients after ACS. Patients treated with atorvastatin were divided by four-month LDL values into groups: >100, >80 to 100 (reference-range-meeting guidelines), >60 to 80, >40 to 60, and <40 mg/dl. Baseline, clinical, and safety data were compared among groups achieving guideline recommendation levels or lower. RESULTS: Among 1,825 patients with four-month LDL, 91% were at goal (<100 mg/dl). The distribution was >80 to 100 mg/dl (14%), >60 to 80 mg/dl (31%), >40 to 60 mg/dl (34%), and <40 mg/dl (11%). Those with lower LDL levels were more often male, older, and diabetic, and had lower baseline LDL levels. They had prior statin therapy and fewer prior myocardial infarctions (MI). There were no significant differences in safety parameters, including muscle, liver, or retinal abnormalities, intracranial hemorrhage, or death, in the very low LDL groups. The <40 mg/dl and 40 to 60 mg/dl groups had fewer major cardiac events (death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia, revascularization). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients treated with an accepted LDL goal (80 to 100 mg/dl), there was no adverse effect on safety with lower achieved LDL levels, and apparent improved clinical efficacy. These data identify no intrinsic safety concern of achieving low LDL and, therefore, a strategy of intensive treatment need not be altered in patients achieving very low LDL levels.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 10/2005; 46(8):1411-1416.
-
Shelby D Reed,
Jasmina I Radeva,
Kevin P Weinfurt,
John J V McMurray, Marc A Pfeffer,
Eric J Velazquez,
Jennifer S Allsbrook,
Leah E Masselink,
Mary Ann Sellers,
Robert M Califf,
Kevin A Schulman
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In a multinational clinical trial, valsartan was statistically not inferior to captopril in reducing mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with signs of heart failure and/or left ventricular dysfunction. We conducted a prospective economic evaluation to compare within-trial resource use, costs, and quality of life in patients receiving valsartan, captopril, or both after MI.
We assigned country-specific unit costs to resource use data for 14703 patients and measured health-related quality of life in a subset of 4524 patients. We used the nonparametric bootstrap method to compare rates of resource use and costs, and a piecewise linear mixed-effects regression analysis to compare longitudinal measures of quality of life.
There were no significant differences in rates of resource use between the valsartan and captopril groups. During an average follow-up of 2 years, total costs for patients receiving valsartan were significantly higher than for patients receiving captopril (USD 14103 vs USD 13038; 95% CI USD 369-USD 1875). The cost differential was caused primarily by the cost of the study medications (USD 1056 for valsartan vs USD 165 for captopril; 95% CI USD 867 to USD 912). Quality of life did not differ significantly between groups.
For most patients at high risk after MI, the availability of generic captopril confers a cost advantage over valsartan because of lower medication costs. The difference will be smaller or nonexistent in settings where brand-name ACE inhibitors are prescribed.
American heart journal 09/2005; 150(2):323-9. · 4.65 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Diabetes is a risk factor for heart failure, and both conditions are increasing. Identifying treatments that prevent both conditions will be clinically important. We previously reported that candesartan (an angiotensin receptor blocker) reduces cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in heart failure patients (CHARM: Candesartan in Heart Failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity Program).
We assessed the impact of candesartan versus placebo on the development of diabetes, a predefined secondary outcome in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study involving 5436 of the 7601 patients with heart failure, irrespective of ejection fraction, who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes at entry into the trial. Patients received candesartan (target of 32 mg once daily) or matching placebo for 2 to 4 years. One hundred sixty-three (6.0%) individuals in the candesartan group developed diabetes, as compared with 202 (7.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.64 to 0.96; P=0.020). The composite end point of death or diabetes occurred in 692 (25.2%) and 779 (28.6%), respectively, in the candesartan and placebo groups (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.95; P=0.004). The results were not statistically heterogeneous in the various subgroups examined, although the apparent magnitude of benefit appeared to be smaller among those treated concomitantly with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at trial entry (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.20) compared with those not receiving these drugs (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.93; P for heterogeneity, 0.28).
The angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan appears to prevent diabetes in heart failure patients, suggesting that the renin-angiotensin axis is implicated in glucose regulation.
Circulation 08/2005; 112(1):48-53. · 14.74 Impact Factor
-
Scott D Solomon,
Hicham Skali,
Mikhail Bourgoun,
James Fang,
Jalal K Ghali,
Michel Martelet,
Dariusz Wojciechowski,
Baiba Ansmite,
Janis Skards,
Toivo Laks,
David Henry,
Milton Packer, Marc A Pfeffer
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition attenuates ventricular remodeling and improves ventricular function in heart failure patients. Vasopeptidase inhibition has shown similar effects in experimental models.
The OVERTURE echocardiographic study was designed to test the hypothesis that the vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat would attenuate ventricular remodeling and improve ventricular function to a greater extent than an ACE inhibitor.
Three hundred twenty-one patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association class > or = 2) were included in the OVERTURE echocardiographic substudy and were randomized to receive enalapril (10 mg twice a day) or omapatrilat (40 mg every day). Echocardiograms were performed at baseline and at 1 year (n = 214). Left ventricular size was estimated by summation of ventricular areas in apical and short-axis views and by calculation of ventricular volumes. Ejection fraction was calculated from ventricular volumes.
Combined diastolic and systolic areas and volumes decreased significantly (mean diastolic area change -8.36 cm2, 95% CI -9.4 to -7.3 cm2; mean systolic change -8.4 cm2, 95% CI -9.5 to -7.3 cm2), and ejection fractions increased significantly (3.6%, 95% CI 2.6% to 4.6%) in both treatment groups from baseline to 1 year. There were no differences in the magnitude of improvement in ventricular size or function based on treatment assignment. Patients who died or were hospitalized for heart failure subsequent to the final assessment demonstrated the least degree of reverse remodeling.
Ventricular size and function improved similarly after 1 year with ACE or vasopeptidase inhibition in patients with heart failure. Reverse remodeling was associated with improved outcome.
American heart journal 08/2005; 150(2):257-62. · 4.65 Impact Factor
-
Tomas Berl,
Lawrence G Hunsicker,
Julia B Lewis, Marc A Pfeffer,
Jerome G Porush,
Jean-Lucien Rouleau,
Paul L Drury,
Enric Esmatjes,
Donald Hricik,
Marc Pohl,
Itamar Raz,
Philippe Vanhille,
Thomas B Wiegmann,
Bernard M Wolfe,
Francesco Locatelli,
Samuel Z Goldhaber,
Edmund J Lewis
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Elevated arterial pressure enhances the risk for cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The optimal BP and the component of the elevated BP that affect the risk have not been defined. A post hoc analysis was performed to assess the impact of achieved systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures on CV outcomes in 1590 adults who had overt diabetic nephropathy and were enrolled in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and had a baseline serum creatinine above the normal range, up to 266 micromol/L (3.0 mg/dL), 24-h urine protein >900 mg/d, and at least 6 mo of follow-up. Patients were randomized to irbesartan, amlodipine, or placebo, with other antihypertensive agents to a BP goal of < or =135/85 mmHg. Progressively lower achieved systolic BP (SBP) to 120 mmHg predicted a decrease in CV mortality and congestive heart failure (CHF) but not myocardial infarctions (MI). A SBP below this threshold was associated with increased risk for CV deaths and CHF events. Achieved diastolic BP <85 mmHg was associated with a trend to increase in all-cause mortality, significant increase in MI, but decreased risk for strokes. Increased pulse pressure predicted increased all-cause mortality, CV mortality, MI, and CHF. It is concluded that achieved SBP approaching 120 mmHg and diastolic BP of 85 mmHg are associated with the best protection against CV events in these patients. BP < or =120/85 may be associated with an increase in CV events.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 07/2005; 16(7):2170-9. · 9.66 Impact Factor
