-
José I Labarta,
Eva Barrio,
Laura Audí,
Mónica Fernández-Cancio, Pilar Andaluz,
Antonio de Arriba,
Beatriz Puga,
María T Calvo,
Esteban Mayayo,
Antonio Carrascosa,
Angel Ferrández-Longás
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: CONTEXT: IGF-I is essential for normal human growth and mediates its effects through the IGF1R. IGF1R mutations have been associated with varying degrees of intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. OBJECTIVE: To identify IGF1R gene mutations in a short-statured family with intrauterine growth retardation and microcephaly. METHODS: Direct DNA sequencing was used to identify IGF1R mutations. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analyses were performed for deletions and duplications of all IGF1R exons. Functional studies were conducted to assess mutation pathogenicity. RESULTS: A novel heterozygous IGF1R missense mutation in exon 7 (c.A1549T, p.Y487F) was identified in a short-statured girl with severe prenatal growth retardation and microcephaly. The same mutation was also identified in her mother, who presented prenatal and postnatal growth failure, and her short-statured maternal grandmother, both of whom exhibited microcephaly. The index case showed a partial response to rhGH. Functional studies performed in dermal fibroblasts from the index case and her mother showed normal IGF-I binding; however, IGF-I activation of intracellular signalling measured as AKT and ERK phosphorylation was markedly reduced, with patients's values being lower than those of her mother. IGF-I stimulation of DNA synthesis was significantly reduced compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Our results show a novel missense mutation in the IGF1R gene (c.A1549T, p.Y487F) associated with prenatal and postnatal growth failure and microcephaly in the context of familial short stature. The functional studies are in line with the inactivation of one copy of the IGF1R gene with variable expression within the same family. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Clinical Endocrinology 06/2012; · 3.17 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In short small-for-gestational-age (SGA) patients, the exon 3-deleted(d3)/full-length (fl)-GHR polymorphism was associated with responsiveness to GH therapy (30-48 microg/kg.d); however, these results were not confirmed for higher GH doses (56-66 microg/kg.d). We hypothesized that higher doses would mask the lower dose differences.
Our objective was to evaluate, in short SGA patients, 2-yr growth response to GH therapy (32.1 +/- 3.8 microg/kg.d) according to exon d3/fl-GHR genotypes.
This was a 2-yr follow-up study.
There was a total of 60 short SGA children (d3/d3 n = 8, d3/fl n = 23, and fl/fl n = 29). There were 11 children that entered puberty during the second follow-up year. Results were evaluated for all patients (group A1, n = 60, 7.7 +/- 2.7 yr) and for patients who remained prepubertal (group A2, n = 49, 6.9 +/- 2.2 yr).
Patients were followed by a single clinical team, and exon d3/fl-GHR genotypes were determined and analyzed in the same hospital.
In groups A1 and A2, growth velocity significantly (P < 0.0001) increased during the first and second years of therapy, as did height sd score (SDS). These increases were similar in each exon d3/fl-GHR genotype. Total 2-yr height gain (cm, SDS) did not differ statistically among genotypes: group A1, 15.0 +/- 2.0 cm and 1.15 +/- 0.45 SDS in d3/d3, 16.0 +/- 2.4 cm and 1.17 +/- 0.51 SDS in d3/fl, 16.1 +/- 2.4 cm and 1.15 +/- 0.53 SDS in fl/fl; and group A2, 15.4 +/- 2.0 cm and 1.03 +/- 0.42 SDS in d3/d3, 15.6 +/- 2.1 cm and 1.22 +/- 0.51 in d3/fl, and 16.2 +/- 2.6 cm and 1.21 +/- 0.56 SDS in fl/fl.
These results did not confirm our hypothesis and show that, in short SGA children, 2-yr growth response to GH therapy 32.1 +/- 3.8 microg/kg.d was similar for each exon d3/fl-GHR genotype carried, as occurred in our previous study using 66 microkg.d.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 01/2008; 93(1):147-53. · 6.50 Impact Factor
-
Cristina Esteban,
Laura Audí,
Antonio Carrascosa,
Mónica Fernández-Cancio,
Annalisa Pérez-Arroyo,
Angels Ulied, Pilar Andaluz,
Rosa Arjona,
Marian Albisu,
María Clemente,
Miquel Gussinyé,
Diego Yeste
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: GH1 gene presents a complex map of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the entire promoter, coding and noncoding regions. The aim of the study was to establish the complete map of GH1 gene SNPs in our control normal population and to analyse its association with adult height.
A systematic GH1 gene analysis was designed in a control population of 307 adults of both sexes with height normally distributed within normal range for the same population: -2 standard deviation scores (SDS) to +2 SDS. An analysis was performed on individual and combined genotype associations with adult height.
Twenty-five SNPs presented a frequency over 1%: 11 in the promoter (P1 to P11), three in the 5'UTR region (P12 to P14), one in exon 1 (P15), three in intron 1 (P16 to P18), two in intron 2 (P19 and P20), two in exon 4 (P21 and P22) and three in intron 4 (P23 to P25). Twenty-nine additional changes with frequencies under 1% were found in 29 subjects. P8, P19, P20 and P25 had not been previously described. P6, P12, P17 and P25 accounted for 6.2% of the variation in adult height (P = 0.0007) in this population with genotypes A/G at P6, G/G at P6 and A/G at P12 decreasing height SDS (-0.063 +/- 0.031, -0.693 +/- 0.350 and -0.489 +/- 0.265, Mean +/- SE) and genotypes A/T at P17 and T/G at P25 increasing height SDS (+1.094 +/- 0.456 and +1.184 +/- 0.432).
This study established the GH1 gene sequence variation map in a normal adult height control population confirming the high density of SNPs in a relatively small gene. Our study shows that the more frequent SNPs did not significantly contribute to height determination, while only one promoter and two intronic SNPs contributed significantly to it. Studies in larger populations will have to confirm the associations and in vitro functional studies will elucidate the mechanisms involved. Systematic GH1 gene analysis in patients with growth delay and suspected GH deficiency/insufficiency will clarify whether different SNP frequencies and/or the presence of different sequence changes may be associated with phenotypes in them.
Clinical Endocrinology 03/2007; 66(2):258-68. · 3.17 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In order to assess whether vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are involved in the genetic regulation of type 1 diabetes susceptibility, a case-control study was conducted in two Spanish populations with different genetic backgrounds.
155 patients with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes and 280 healthy controls from Barcelona, and 89 patients and 116 controls from Navarre were studied for vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in peripheral blood DNA. Intron 8 (BsmI) and exon 2 (FokI) segments were amplified by PCR and sequenced to determine each corresponding genotype. Differences for allele, genotype and combined haplotype and genotype distribution between patients and controls within each population and between the two populations were analyzed.
BsmI genotype and allele frequencies showed a tendency towards increased bb genotype and b allele frequencies in Barcelona patients and the tendency was inverse in Navarre. FokI polymorphism distribution analysis showed a significant decrease in ff genotype (p = 0.016) in patients versus controls from Navarre. Combined genotypes showed homozygous bb/FF genotype to be increased in Barcelona patients (p = 0.04) whereas homozygous bb/ff genotype was decreased in Navarre patients (p = 0.02) versus their corresponding controls. BF haplotype frequency distribution between patients and controls was inverse and significantly different between Barcelona and Navarre (p = 0.04).
Combined genotypes for vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms at intron 8 and exon 2 suggest that the more active form of vitamin D receptor gene (FF genotype) can be increased in Mediterranean diabetic patients whereas the less active form (ff genotype) can be decreased in those from Navarre. Our results suggest that, in both groups, the F allele of exon 2 VDR gene polymorphism may increase type 1 diabetes susceptibility.
Medicina Clínica 10/2004; 123(8):286-90. · 1.38 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A patient with male pseudohermaphroditism and clinical diagnosis of partial androgen insensitivity in the neonatal period was studied at pubertal age for a molecular diagnosis. Hormone studies were conducted at baseline and under hCG stimulation for testosterone and dihydrotestosterone determinations at 2 months of age. Gonadectomy was performed at 4 months. At the age of 13 years genital skin fibroblasts were studied for androgen binding and 5alpha-reductase activity and peripheral blood DNA was available for androgen receptor (AR) and 5alpha-reductase (SRD5A2) gene analysis. Exons 1-8 of AR gene and exons 1-5 of SRD5A2 gene were sequenced. AR gene coding sequences were normal. SRD5A2 gene analysis revealed two heterozygote mutations (G115D and R246W), with the mother carrying the G115D and the father the R246W mutations. The compound heterozygote mutations in SRD5A2 gene explained an extremely low 5alpha-reductase enzyme activity in genital skin fibroblasts. Revision of hormonal data from the neonatal period revealed an increased testosterone-to-dihydrotestosterone ratio at the end of an hCG stimulation test, which concurred with the molecular diagnosis. Testis morphology at 4 months of age was normal. Clinical and biochemical differential diagnosis between partial androgen insensitivity syndrome and 5alpha-reductase enzyme deficiency is difficult in the neonatal period and before puberty. Our results show that in our patient the testosterone-to-dihydrotestosterone ratio would have adequately orientated the diagnosis. The two mutations in SRD5A2 gene have been described in patients of different lineages, though not in combination to date. Testis morphology showed that, during early infancy, the 5alpha-reductase deficiency may not have affected interstitial or tubular development.
Hormone Research 02/2004; 62(5):259-64. · 2.48 Impact Factor
