Publications (13)110.68 Total impact
-
Article: Hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: The IHF2SQ regimen.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for unresectable advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is chemoradiotherapy, which can be toxic, particularly among patients with coexisting medical conditions. We report our experience with the hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen Irradiation HypoFractionnée 2 Séances Quotidiennes (IHF2SQ). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 78 patients treated with the IHF2SQ regimen. Radiotherapy was administrated as 2 fractions of 3 Gy per day (days 1 and 3), during the first, third, fifth, and seventh week of treatment with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Tolerance was excellent. Forty-one patients had complete or partial response. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.9 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.3 months. One-year OS, specific survival (SS), and PFS were 58%, 71%, 51.5%, respectively. Independent predictive factors increasing the PFS were response to chemoradiotherapy, male sex, and laryngeal tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is an alternative to conventional chemoradiotherapy with good response rates and acceptable toxicity for selected patients. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2013.Head & Neck 01/2013; · 2.40 Impact Factor -
Article: Radiotherapy technical considerations in the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: American-French consensus recommendations.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Pancreatic carcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Approximately 30% of pancreatic cancer patients present with locally advanced, unresectable nonmetastatic disease. For these patients, two therapeutic options exist: systemic chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Within this context, the optimal technique for pancreatic irradiation is not clearly defined. A search to identify relevant studies was undertaken using the Medline database. All Phase III randomized trials evaluating the modalities of radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer were included, as were some noncontrolled Phase II and retrospective studies. An expert panel convened with members of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and GERCOR cooperative groups to review identified studies and prepare the guidelines. Each member of the working group independently evaluated five endpoints: total dose, target volume definition, radiotherapy planning technique, dose constraints to organs at risk, and quality assurance. Based on this analysis of the literature, we recommend either three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy to a total dose of 50 to 54 Gy at 1.8 to 2 Gy per fraction. We propose gross tumor volume identification to be followed by an expansion of 1.5 to 2 cm anteriorly, posteriorly, and laterally, and 2 to 3 cm craniocaudally to generate the planning target volume. The craniocaudal margins can be reduced with the use of respiratory gating. Organs at risk are liver, kidneys, spinal cord, stomach, and small bowel. Stereotactic body radiation therapy should not be used for pancreatic cancer outside of clinical trials. Radiotherapy quality assurance is mandatory in clinical trials. These consensus recommendations are proposed for use in the development of future trials testing new chemotherapy combinations with radiotherapy. Not all of these recommendations will be appropriate for trials testing radiotherapy dose or dose intensity concepts.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 08/2012; 83(5):1355-64. · 4.59 Impact Factor -
Article: [Emergency and semi-emergencies in radiation therapy].
La Revue du praticien 01/2011; 61(1):81-2. -
Article: Nomogram to predict subsequent brain metastasis in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE Brain metastasis is usually a fatal event in patients with stage IV breast cancer. We hypothesized that its occurrence can be predicted if a clinical nomogram can be developed, thus allowing for selection of enriched patient populations for prevention trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Electronic medical records of patients with metastatic breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed for the period between January 2000 and February 2007 under a study approved by the institutional review board. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of selected prognostic features was done. A nomogram to predict brain metastasis was constructed and validated in a cohort of 128 patients with brain metastasis treated at the Cross Cancer Institute (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada). Results Of 2,136 patients with breast cancer, 362 developed subsequent brain metastasis. Age, grade, negative status of estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, number of metastatic sites (one v > one), and short disease-free survival were significantly and independently associated with subsequent brain metastasis. The nomogram showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.69) in the training set. The validation set showed a good discrimination with an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.79). The nomogram was well calibrated, with no significant difference between the predicted and the observed probabilities. CONCLUSION We have developed a robust tool that is able to predict subsequent brain metastasis in patients with breast cancer with nonbrain metastatic disease. Selection of an enriched patient population at high risk for brain metastasis will facilitate the design of trials aiming at its prevention.Journal of Clinical Oncology 03/2010; 28(12):2032-7. · 18.37 Impact Factor -
Article: [Is there still a place for radiotherapy for the treatment of pancreatic cancers?].
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: About 7,200 new cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are diagnosed each year in France. At the time of diagnosis, only 20% of patients have an operable tumor; 30% have local or regional extensions and 50% metastatic dissemination. Median survival of patients after surgical resection ranges from 12 to 20 months, because of the high relapse rate. Currently, the use of radiotherapy is controversial for patients with operable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The standard treatment is six months of chemotherapy with FUFOL or gemcitabine. Combining it with radiation therapy as an adjuvant (CRT) may improve the survival of patients with incompletely resected tumors. This must still be demonstrated in a prospective trial. Neoadjuvant CRT is a promising treatment but still under evaluation. There is no standard treatment for patients with locally advanced tumors. A strategy of initial chemotherapy (gemcitabine) followed by CRT for patients with non-progressive tumors is under evaluation in the LAP07randomized trial.La Presse Médicale 11/2009; 39(6):645-52. · 0.67 Impact Factor -
Article: Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a qualitative systematic review.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Pancreatic carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. At time of diagnosis, 30% of patients present with a locally advanced unresectable but nonmetastatic pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). The French program Standards, Options, and Recommendations was promoted to conduct a qualitative systematic review to evaluate the role of radiotherapy in patients with LAPC. A search to identify eligible studies was undertaken using the MEDLINE database. All phase III randomized trials and systematic reviews evaluating the role of radiotherapy in LAPC were included, together with some noncontrolled studies if no phase III trials were retrieved. The quality and clinical relevance of the studies were evaluated using validated checklists, which allowed associating each result with a level of evidence. Twenty-one studies were included, as follows: two meta-analyses, 13 randomized trials, and six nonrandomized trials. Chemoradiotherapy increases overall survival when compared with best supportive care (level of evidence C) or with exclusive radiotherapy (level B1), but is more toxic (level B1). Chemoradiotherapy is not superior to chemotherapy in terms of survival (level B1) and increases toxicity (level A). Recent data favor limited irradiation to the tumor volume (level C). Fluorouracil is still the reference chemotherapy in association with radiotherapy (level B1). Induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy improves survival (level C). No standard treatment exists, but there are two options for treatment of LAPC; these are gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by a chemoradiotherapy is a promising strategy for selection of patients without early metastatic/progressing disease.Journal of Clinical Oncology 04/2009; 27(13):2269-77. · 18.37 Impact Factor -
Article: Preoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy for bulky stage IB2, IIA, and IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix with proximal parametrial invasion.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate toxicity, local tumor control, and survival after preoperative chemoradiation for operable bulky cervical carcinoma. Between December 1991 and July 2006, 92 patients with operable bulky stage IB2, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma without pelvic or para-aortic nodes on pretreatment imaging were treated. Treatment consisted of preoperative external beam pelvic radiation therapy (EBRT) and concomitant chemotherapy (CT) during the first and fourth weeks of radiation combining 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. The pelvic radiation dose was 40.5 Gy over 4.5 weeks. EBRT was followed by low-dose rate uterovaginal brachytherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in 62 patients. After a median rest period of 44 days, all patients underwent Class II modified radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Thirty patients who had not received preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy underwent postoperative low-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy at a dose of 20 Gy. The mean follow-up was 46 months. Pathologic residual tumor was observed in 43 patients. After multivariate analysis, additional preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy was the single significant predictive factor for pathologic complete response rate (p = 0.019). The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 80.4% and 72.2%, respectively. Pathologic residual cervical tumor was the single independent factor decreasing the probability of DFS (p = 0.020). Acute toxicities were moderate. Two severe ureteral complications requiring surgical intervention were observed. Concomitant chemoradiation followed by surgery for operable bulky stage I-II cervical carcinoma without clinical lymph node involvement can be used with acceptable toxicity. Pathologic complete response increases the probability of DFS.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 09/2008; 72(5):1508-15. · 4.59 Impact Factor -
Article: HIV-specific differences in outcome of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: a multicentric cohort study of HIV-positive patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To define clinical outcome after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of anal carcinoma in HIV-infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). A multicentric cohort comparison of 40 HIV-positive patients with HAART and 81 HIV-negative patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) or CRT was retrospectively performed. Local disease control (LC), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), toxicity, and prognostic factors were investigated. HIV-positive patients were younger (mean age, 48 v 62 years; P < .0005), predominantly male (93% v 25%; P < .0005), and with early-stage (P = .06) and large-cell histology (90% v 67%; P = .005) disease. RT or CRT resulted in complete response in 92% (HIV positive) and 96% (HIV negative) of cases. Five-year OS was 61% (95% CI, 44% to 78%) in HIV-positive and 65% (95% CI, 53% to 77%) in HIV-negative patients (median follow-up, 36 months). Five-year LC was 38% (95% CI, 5% to 71%) in HIV-positive and 87% (95% CI, 79% to 95%) in HIV-negative patients (P = .008) compromising CSS and sphincter preservation. Grade 3/4 acute skin (35% v 17% [HIV negative]; P = .04) and hematologic (33% v 12% [HIV negative]; P = .08) toxicity together approximated 50% in HIV-positive patients. RFS in HIV-positive patients was associated with RT dose (P = .08) and severe acute skin toxicity (P = .04). Long-term LC and acute toxicity represent major clinical challenges in HIV-positive patients with anal carcinoma. Even if fluoropyrimidine-based CRT is feasible and may result in similar response rates and OS as in HIV-negative patients, improved treatment strategies with better long-term outcome are warranted.Journal of Clinical Oncology 05/2008; 26(15):2550-7. · 18.37 Impact Factor -
Article: Concomitant administration of weekly oxaliplatin, fluorouracil continuous infusion, and radiotherapy after 2 months of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin induction in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a Groupe Coordinateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie phase II study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: According to previously reported Groupe Coordinateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) studies in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) may be recommended for patients who do not experience disease progression after systemic induction chemotherapy (CT). To further improve patient outcome with classical fluorouracil (FU)-based CCRT, this study was designed to prospectively investigate a CCRT with FU infusion and weekly oxaliplatin after 2 months of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) induction chemotherapy. Nonpretreated patients with LAPC having WHO performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 received four induction cycles of GEMOX (gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2; day 1 of a 15-day cycle). One month after cycle 4, patients who did not experience disease progression with PS 0 to 2 received 45 Gy over 5 weeks + 10 Gy (as a concomitant boost during the last 2 weeks) of radiotherapy (RT), with daily 250 mg/m(2) FU as a continuous infusion and 60 mg/m(2)of oxaliplatin weekly. Of 59 patients, 50 patients (84.7%) received CCRT, whereas nine patients did not because of disease progression (seven patients), CT toxicity (one patient), or personal decision (one patient). Forty-four patients (74.5%) completed the fully planned CCRT. Median progression-free survival and overall survival durations were 7.6 and 12.2 months, respectively, for the whole population and 9.4 and 12.6 months, respectively, for patients who completed CCRT. CCRT grade 3 to 4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) were neutropenia (10.4%), thrombocytopenia (8.4%), nausea and vomiting (16.7%), and diarrhea (12.5%). Concomitant administration of weekly oxaliplatin, continuous-infusion FU, and RT in patients with LAPC is feasible, with an acceptable acute and late safety profile. The encouraging results observed despite a nonoptimal patient selection (owing to the short induction time) indicates that further randomized evaluation to better define the specific role of oxaliplatin in CCRT is deserved.Journal of Clinical Oncology 04/2008; 26(7):1080-5. · 18.37 Impact Factor -
Article: Growth inhibition by STI571 in combination with radiation in human chronic myelogenous leukemia K562 cells.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Altered radiation responses by STI571 (Imatinib, Glivec), a specific inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of Bcr-Abl, was assessed in K562 chronic myelogenous leukemia cells using growth inhibition and colony formation assays. Flow cytometry, Western blotting, and microscope observation were used to determine cell cycle redistribution, erythroid differentiation, apoptosis, necrosis, senescence, and expression and phosphorylation of effectors downstream from Bcr-Abl as endpoints. STI571 (> or =24-h contact) retarded the growth of K562 cells and elicited reduction in the G(2)-phase content due to an efficient arrest in early S phase rather than to the disruption of the G(2) checkpoint as confirmed by analysis of Lyn and CDK1 phosphorylation. STI571 brought about the inhibitory dephosphorylation of Bcr-Abl and STAT5, but the expression of DNA-PKcs and Rad51 was unaffected and the interaction between radiation and STI571 was strictly additive with regard to induction of apoptosis. Overall STI571 interacted cooperatively with radiation to retard the growth of K562 cells but did not affect intrinsic radiosensitivity. However, STI571 and radiation acted antagonistically with each other with regard to induction of senescence and erythroid differentiation.Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 03/2008; 7(2):398-406. · 5.23 Impact Factor -
Article: [Gemcitabine and digestive carcinomas].
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gemcitabine is a well-tolerated anti-tumour drug with broad-spectrum activity. It is now recommended for treatment in an increasing number of tumours. Locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer is the only digestive cancer for which it has yet been approved. Numerous phase III trials have addressed gemcitabine's dosage, infusion modalities, and its potential association with other anti-tumour drugs in pancreatic cancer. Standard recommended treatment for this disease in 2006 is gemcitabine monotherapy following Burris'protocol, that is 1000 mg per square meter in a 30 minute-infusion weekly for seven weeks, one week off and then weekly for three weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. Many phase I or II trials have been carried out in all other digestive cancers. They show gemcitabine's potential activity, especially in esophageal cancer, biliary tract adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Nevertheless, larger studies are required to confirm this efficacy. The aim of this review is to describe the trials that have contributed to determine gemcitabine's infusion modalities in pancreatic cancer. We will then present the studies that have been carried out in other digestive cancers.Bulletin du cancer 02/2007; 94 Spec No Actualites:S104-15. · 0.67 Impact Factor -
Article: Impact of chemoradiotherapy after disease control with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in GERCOR phase II and III studies.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The management of locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer patients remains controversial. To select patients who could benefit from chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the therapeutic strategy used by the Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) consisted of initial chemotherapy (CT) for at least 3 months. The decision to administer CRT or continue CT in nonprogressive patients was the investigator's choice. Retrospective analysis of outcome in 181 patients with LA pancreatic cancer (76 women and 105 men; mean age, 61 years; range, 37 to 85 years) enrolled onto prospective phase II and III GERCOR studies was performed to compare the survival of patients who received CRT with that of patients who continued CT alone. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times for the 181 patients were 6.3 and 11.4 months, respectively. Fifty-three patients (29.3%) had metastatic disease after 3 months of CT and were not eligible for CRT. Among the 128 remaining patients (70.3%) who had no disease progression and who were, therefore, eligible for CRT, 72 (56%) received CRT (group A), whereas 56 (44%) continued with CT (group B). The two groups were balanced for initial characteristics (performance status, sex, age, and type of CT), as well as for induction CT results. In groups A and B, the median PFS times were 10.8 and 7.4 months, respectively (P = .005), and the median OS times were 15.0 and 11.7 months, respectively (P = .0009). These results suggest that, after control of disease by initial CT, CRT could significantly improve survival in patients with LA pancreatic cancer compared with CT alone. A prospective phase III study is ongoing to evaluate this strategy.Journal of Clinical Oncology 02/2007; 25(3):326-31. · 18.37 Impact Factor -
Article: [Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 2006].
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: About 5,300 new cases of pancreatic adenocarcinomas are diagnosed each year in France. At the time of diagnosis, an efficient carcinologic surgery will not be possible for nearly 80% of patients, in relation to locoregional extension or metastatic dissemination. After surgical resection, the median survival of resected patients ranges from 12 to 20 months, with a high rate of loco-regional or metastatic relapses. Numerous therapeutic trials, adjuvant or neo-adjuvant, have been conducted in aim of which to improve locoregioanl control and survival rates. Chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy represent adjuvant treatments. In one trial, a chemotherapy regimen with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FUFOL) has proven its efficience for survival improvement by comparison to chemoradiotherapy and is at this time the reference treatment in Europe. In another trial, using adjuvant gemcitabine results in an improvement in disease-free survival. Some phase III trials are in progress to evaluate new therapeutic strategies. The aim of neoadjuvant strategy using chemoradiotherapy is to enhance the rate of complete resections and by the way local control. This is under evaluation. This paper presents a summary of adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials for patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Bulletin du cancer 02/2007; 94(1):72-80. · 0.67 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
Institutions
-
2013
-
Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6
Paris, Ile-de-France, France
-
-
2011–2012
-
Hôpital Tenon – Hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien
Paris, Ile-de-France, France
-
-
2007–2009
-
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Paris, Ile-de-France, France
-
-
2008
-
Institut Curie
Paris, Ile-de-France, France
-
