Sébastien Beun

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, BRU, Belgium

Are you Sébastien Beun?

Claim your profile

Publications (5)12.03 Total impact

  • Article: Physical, mechanical and rheological characterization of resin-based pit and fissure sealants compared to flowable resin composites.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical and rheological properties of resin-based pit and fissure sealants to flowable resin composites in order to define clinical indications based on these properties. Eight flowable resin composites (Admira Flow, Filtek Supreme XT Flow, FlowLine, Grandio Flow, Point-4 Flowable, Premise Flowable, Revolution Formula 2, X-Flow) and four resin-based pit and fissure sealants (Clinpro, Delton FS(+), Estiseal F, Guardian Seal) were used in this study. Their filler weight content was measured by thermogravimetric analysis. Mechanical properties were measured: dynamic and static moduli of elasticity, flexural strength and Vickers microhardness. Rheological measurements were performed using a dynamic oscillation rheometer. Flowable resin composites have by far better mechanical properties than pit and fissure sealants, except for Delton FS(+). All the materials tested are non-Newtonian, shear thinning fluids. They all showed elasticity even at the lowest frequencies but elasticity differs pretty much from one material to another. Resin-based pit and fissure sealants seem appropriate for preventive pit and fissure sealing. For enlarged fissures, it can be assumed that flowable resin composites with low elasticity at low frequency are more appropriate.
    Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 11/2011; 28(4):349-59. · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • Article: Rheological properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA flowable resin composites with various macrofiller/microfiller ratio.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to investigate the rheological behavior of resin composites and to evaluate the influence of each component, organic as well as inorganic, on their viscoelastic properties by testing model experimental formulations. Several unfilled mixtures of 2,2-bis-[4-(methacryloxy-2-hydroxy-propoxy)-phenyl]-propane (Bis-GMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) were prepared as well as experimental flowable resin composites using a Bis-GMA/TEGDMA 50/50 wt% mixture as organic fraction filled at 60% in weight with varying ratios of silanated barium glass (1 microm) and partially hydrophobic fumed silica (0.1 microm). Their rheological properties were investigated using dynamic oscillatory rheometers. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was also performed to investigate the spatial organization of the filler particles. Unfilled Bis-GMA/TEGDMA mixtures all showed a Newtonian behavior. The experimental flowable resin composites were non-Newtonian, shear-thinning fluids. As the quantity of microfiller increased, the viscosity increased and the shear-thinning behavior increased as well. In addition, the experimental composites showed thixotropy, i.e. their viscosity is a function of time after deformation. All these properties were not specifically linked to the creation and destruction of a visible network between inorganic particles, as no difference could be seen between particles' spatial organization at the equilibrium rest state or immediately after deformation. The complex viscoelastic properties of resin composites are due to interactions between microfiller and monomer molecules. Modifying the chemical and physical properties of the particles' surface could possibly improve their flow properties and thus their clinical handling performances.
    Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 08/2008; 25(2):198-205. · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • Article: Rheological properties of flowable resin composites and pit and fissure sealants.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this research was to determine the viscoelastic properties of commercially available flowable resin composites and resin-based pit and fissure sealants. The weight percentage of filler particles and the morphology of the filler particles were also investigated. Eight flowable resin composites (Admira Flow, Filtek Flow, FlowLine, Grandio Flow, Point-4 Flowable, Revolution Formula 2, Tetric Flow and X-Flow) and four pit and fissure sealants (Clinpro, Delton FS+, Estiseal F and Guardian Seal) were tested. Rheological measurements were performed using a dynamic oscillation rheometer. The filler weight content was determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and the morphology of the particles was investigated by scanning-electron microscopy (SEM). Flowable resin composites are non-Newtonian, shear-thinning materials. As the shear rate increased, the complex viscosity decreased drastically. They all showed elasticity even at the lowest frequencies. They also all showed thixotropy. Pit and fissure sealants are non-Newtonian, very low-viscosity fluids. No correlation was found between the rheological properties and the filler weight content or the particles' shape. Huge differences are observed in the viscosity and flow characteristics of flowable resin composites that can have a potential influence on their clinical behavior during handling and thus on their clinical indications. Pit and fissure sealants show very different rheological properties from one another.
    Dental Materials 05/2008; 24(4):548-55. · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare the inorganic fraction and the mechanical properties of three nanofilled composites with four universal hybrid and two microfilled composites. The degrees of conversion of the materials photopolymerized using halogen and LED units were also investigated. Three nanofilled (Supreme, Grandio and Grandio Flow), four universal hybrid (Point-4, Tetric Ceram, Venus, Z 100) and two microfilled (A 110, Durafill VS) composites were used in this study. Their filler weight content was measured by thermogravimetric analysis. The morphology of the filler particles was determined using scanning-electron microscopy (SEM). Mechanical properties were measured: dynamic and static elastic moduli, flexural strength and Vickers microhardness. The degree of conversion in relation with the depth of polymerization of every material tested was evaluated using Raman spectrophotometry. Nanofilled resin composites show higher elastic moduli than those of universal and microfilled composites, except for the Z-100. The microfilled composites exhibit by far the lowest mechanical properties. The flexural strength does not appear as a discriminating factor in this study. The degrees of polymerization obtained with the halogen lamp are higher than those obtained with the LED lamp. Nanofilled resin composites show mechanical properties at least as good as those of universal hybrids and could thus be used for the same clinical indications as well as for anterior restorations due to their high aesthetic properties.
    Dental Materials 02/2007; 23(1):51-9. · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • Article: [Manual or rotary root canal preparation? Nickel-titanium or stainless steel? Review of the literature].
    Sébastien Beun, P Bogaerts, J P Van Nieuwenhuysen
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this review was to determine the advantages and disadvantages of rotative nickel-titanium endodontic instruments compared with stainless steel manual instruments on the basis of in vitro studies. Indeed, many articles about this topic have been published these last few years and it has now been demonstrated that these new instruments show many advantages compared with classical manual instruments. However, they cannot solve every clinical situation and the use of manual stainless steel instruments still remains essential.
    Revue belge de médecine dentaire. 02/2005; 60(2):81-91.

Institutions

  • 2011
    • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
      Brussels, BRU, Belgium
  • 2005–2008
    • Université Catholique de Louvain
      • School of Dentistry and Stomatology
      Louvain-la-Neuve, WAL, Belgium