-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Using electrophysiology, the attentional functions of target selection and distractor filtering were investigated during visual search. Observers searched for multiple tilted line segments amidst vertical distractors. In different conditions, observers were either looking for a specific line orientation ("feature-based" selection), or for any tilted line ("salience-based"). The search array could contain both left- and rightward tilted lines simultaneously (requiring spatial filtering) or only one line type (no filtering). The amplitude of the P1 event-related potential component was reduced during feature-based selection, compared to salience-based selection. The N1 showed a similar effect, at least when filtering was required. Amplitudes were also somewhat reduced when competing nontarget stimuli required filtering. Interactions between selection and filtering became stronger on the N2a and P3. When both feature-based selection and filtering were required, N2a amplitude was highest, and P3 amplitude was lowest. The results support an early locus of feature-based attentional selection in multi-item search.
Biological psychology 02/2013; · 4.36 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The consequences of maintaining a task set in the context of the (speeded) attentional blink were investigated in a series of experiments. Observers were asked to either attend or ignore the first of two target stimuli (T1 and T2). The results showed that when T1 and T2 shared a task relevant feature that was unique to T2, but not to T1, a shallow attentional blink was observed, as well as a lack of Lag 1 sparing. In comparison, when the targets shared a feature that was uniquely task relevant to both targets, the blink could not be avoided. Conversely, when no feature was shared between targets, ignoring T1 was successful and virtually no attentional costs were apparent. A similar lack of costs was also observed when targets shared a task relevant feature that was unique to T1 but not to T2. Finally, matching the feature dimension of a target feature that was unique to T2, but not T1, also strongly attenuated the blink. However, it did not completely abolish Lag 1 sparing. The results are interpreted in the context of current models of the attentional blink.
Psychological Research 08/2012; · 2.47 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The relationship between attentional control and episodic representation was investigated in six experiments that employed a variant of the classic attentional blink paradigm. We introduced a task-irrelevant (unpredictive) color match between the first and second target stimulus in a three-stream rapid serial visual presentation task. When this match was present, the first target reliably elicited a priming benefit to the identification of the second, lateralized target. However, this was only the case when the identities of the targets did not belong to the same category (digits, letters, or symbols). When targets did belong to the same category, interference was observed instead of priming, particularly at Lag 1. Furthermore, when color was the target-defining feature, interference at Lag 1 gave way to priming at longer lags. The interference effect is attributed to partial overlap between competing episodic target representations, which affects the availability of their overlapping features for successive attentional selection in rapid serial visual presentation.
Psychological Research 08/2012; · 2.47 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: When searching for a target object presented in a context of other, irrelevant objects, the dissimilarity between target and surrounding context elements as well as the similarity between context elements themselves affect search efficiency. The present functional imaging study explored the cortical mechanisms involved in processing the same target when surrounded by context arrangements of varying homogeneity. Results showed that brain activity increased in the precuneus, cingulate gyrus, and the middle temporal gyrus as context homogeneity and local feature contrast increased. Contexts with low homogeneity and local feature contrast, compared to contexts with high homogeneity and local feature contrast, increasingly involved areas near the corpus callosum and the medial frontal gyrus. The results support the assumption that contextual grouping and local target detection both contribute to perform the visual search task.
Neuroscience Letters 09/2011; 502(1):46-51. · 2.11 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Visual STM (VSTM) is thought to be related to visual attention in several ways. Attention controls access to VSTM during memory encoding and plays a role in the maintenance of stored information by strengthening memorized content. We investigated the involvement of visual attention in recall from VSTM. In two experiments, we measured electrophysiological markers of attention in a memory search task with varying intervals between VSTM encoding and recall, and so we were able to track recoding of representations in memory. Results confirmed the involvement of attention in VSTM recall. However, the amplitude of the N2pc and N3rs components, which mark orienting of attention and search within VSTM, decreased as a function of delay. Conversely, the amplitude of the P3 and sustained posterior contralateral negativity components increased as a function of delay, effectively the opposite of the N2pc and N3rs modulations. These effects were only observed when verbal memory was not taxed. Thus, the results suggested that gradual recoding from visuospatial orienting of attention into verbal recall mechanisms takes place from short to long retention intervals. Interestingly, recall at longer delays was faster than at short delays, indicating that verbal representation is coupled with faster responses. These results extend the orienting-of-attention hypothesis by including an account of representational recoding during short-term consolidation and its consequences for recall from VSTM.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 08/2011; 24(3):653-63. · 5.18 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In an ERP experiment, we investigated whether a 'permanent' salient distractor changes the deployment of attention to target and nontarget singletons. Observers searched for a color target in a search array that mainly consisted of black vertical lines, but also always contained a line in a task-irrelevant color. Together with this distractor, a target or nontarget singleton was presented. Nontargets could be salient on the task-relevant dimension (color), or on a neutral dimension (line orientation). N2pc amplitude was maximal for targets, no N2pc was elicited by color nontargets, and orientation nontargets elicited an inverse N2pc. Targets and color nontargets elicited larger N2 amplitude than orientation singletons. P3 amplitude was high for relevant and low for irrelevant singletons. Targets also elicited higher reaction times and more errors. Attention seemed thus driven by the target feature, and by its feature dimension, even when constant distraction on that dimension had to be suppressed.
Biological psychology 03/2011; 87(2):218-25. · 4.36 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Three experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of working memory content on temporal attention in a rapid serial visual presentation attentional blink paradigm. It was shown that categorical similarity between working memory content and the target stimuli pertaining to the attentional task (both digits) increased attentional blink magnitude compared to a condition in which this similarity was absent (colors and digits, respectively). This effect was only observed when the items in working memory were not presented as conjunctions of the involved categories (i.e., colored digits). This suggested that storage and retrieval from working memory was at least preferentially conjunctive in this case. It was furthermore shown that the content of working memory enhanced the identification rate of the second target, by means of repetition priming, when inter-target lag was short and the attentional blink was in effect. The results are incompatible with theories of temporal attention that assume working memory has no causal role in the attentional blink and support theories that do.
PLoS ONE 01/2011; 6(2):e16696. · 4.09 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Electrophysiological measurements were taken from observers performing a visual search within a single feature dimension, and between multiple dimensions. The N2pc to selected singleton target stimuli (rightward tilted lines) was increased when targets varied between feature dimensions, compared to the N2pc to the same rightward tilted line targets, in a condition in which targets varied only between feature values within the same dimension. The anterior and posterior N2 were not reliably modulated, but P3(b) amplitude was higher for singleton present trials that varied between dimensions than for those that varied within. The ERP elicited by singleton absent trials showed reduced P3 amplitude in the between-dimension condition. The electrophysiological modulations were accompanied by increased reaction times in the between-dimension condition, on both singleton present and absent trials. The results suggested that visual target detection is affected by early dimension-specific weighting of the current attentional task set. Furthermore, exhaustively searching multiple feature dimensions to determine the absence of a target incurs dimensional switching costs, possibly at a later stage.
Neuropsychologia 09/2010; 48(11):3365-70. · 3.64 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To attend successfully, a specification of what is currently relevant is necessary, but not sufficient. Irrelevant stimuli that are also present in the environment must be recognized as such and filtered out at the same time. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we showed that posterior brain regions in parietal, occipital and temporal cortex are recruited in order to ignore distracting visual stimuli, while the specification and selection of relevant stimuli is associated with differential activity in frontal cortex and hippocampal areas instead. The results thus suggest that the selection of relevant objects can be anatomically dissociated from the handling of competing irrelevant objects. The dissociation between the increased involvement of parietal and occipital cortex in handling distraction on one hand, and that of frontal cortex in target specification on the other provides neurophysiological support for models of attention that make this functional distinction.
Neuropsychologia 09/2010; 48(11):3335-42. · 3.64 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: An increase in concurrent working memory load has been shown to amplify the attentional blink. The present study investigated the temporal locus of this phenomenon, by using a dual rapid serial visual presentation paradigm that enabled the measurement of lateralized event-related potentials. The P3 component was shown to be affected by both working memory load and the lag between the target stimuli, consistent with current models of temporal attention and a functional explanation of the P3 in terms of memory consolidation. P3 amplitude was reduced for short target lags and high memory loads. The P2 component was affected by lag only, and not memory load. Importantly, the N2pc component was modulated also by both lag and memory load. The results showed that early attentional processing (as marked by the N2pc) was suppressed by increased involvement of working memory, a phenomenon not well predicted by many current theories of temporal attention.
Psychophysiology 04/2010; 47(6):1134-41. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Name agreement is the extent to which different people agree on a name for a particular picture. Previous studies have found that it takes longer to name low name agreement pictures than high name agreement pictures. To examine the effect of name agreement in the online process of picture naming, we compared event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded whilst 19 healthy, native English speakers silently named pictures which had either high or low name agreement. A series of ERP components was examined: P1 approximately 120ms from picture onset, N1 around 170ms, P2 around 220ms, N2 around 290ms, and P3 around 400ms. Additionally, a late time window from 800 to 900ms was considered. Name agreement had an early effect, starting at P1 and possibly resulting from uncertainty of picture identity, and continuing into N2, possibly resulting from alternative names for pictures. These results support the idea that name agreement affects two consecutive processes: first, object recognition, and second, lexical selection and/or phonological encoding.
International journal of psychophysiology: official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 03/2010; 76(3):130-41. · 3.05 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Four experiments are reported that investigated visual event integration by using a variant of the missing element paradigm. Good performance on this task depends on whether two brief successive stimulus displays are perceived as (or integrated into) one single event. We replicated the classic finding of greater accuracy with shorter duration of the first stimulus and ruled out an attention-related account thereof. In a subsequent electrophysiological experiment we found that successful event integration increased the amplitude of the N1, N2, and late P3 components of the event-related potential and decreased early P3 amplitude. No effect on the P1 was observed. The results provided evidence for an early onset of event integration in time and demonstrated the existence of electrophysiological markers of episodic integration. The implications of these results are related to studies on feature-specific integration and early attentional processes.
Psychophysiology 02/2010; 47(3):512-22. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The neural processing fate of target and nontarget singleton stimuli was investigated in a series of visual search tasks. The first experiment showed that the ERPs elicited by nontargets defined in the same feature dimension as targets were identical to those of targets until a relatively late divergence in the P3 time range. The second experiment showed that increased stimulus duration allowed slightly faster attentional selection: The ERPs of targets and nontargets now diverged earlier at the N2pc component, although nontargets still elicited a reliable N2pc, which was indicative of the processing of features of these stimuli. It furthermore seemed that task difficulty did not modulate the observed differences between target and nontarget processing. The third experiment investigated the impact of stimulus-response mapping as well as target probability. The former did not modulate the observed differences, and while the latter modulated absolute ERP amplitude, it again did not change the overall pattern of results. No evidence was found in these experiments for differential processing of targets and nontargets defined in the same feature dimension in the time range of the P2 component or before. In a final experiment, targets were compared with nontargets defined in the same or another feature dimension, and for the latter nontargets a clearly much earlier locus of divergent processing was observed, starting at the P2. The N2pc to these nontargets was also strongly suppressed. The relatively late locus of attentional selection between targets and nontargets defined in the same feature dimension suggested that early attentional processes cannot yet fully distinguish between specific within-dimension features.
Brain research 10/2009; 1307:115-33. · 2.46 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Three experiments examined the temporal dynamics of the impact of symbols with task-irrelevant spatial meanings on attentional control. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were color-cued to report the first letter they saw in the left or right of two parallel letter streams. The cue appeared in the shape of an arrow pointing to the target stream (compatible) or to the other stream (incompatible). Incompatible arrows delayed letter selection; that is, participants reported later-appearing letters and made more errors. In Experiment 3, the target stream was cued in advance, and yet, incompatible symbols delayed target selection. These findings suggest that the irrelevant meaning of symbolic stimuli can still penetrate and bias attentional top-down control, an observation that challenges available control theories.
Attention Perception & Psychophysics 03/2009; 71(2):385-91. · 2.04 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Identifying 2 target stimuli in a rapid stream of visual symbols is much easier if the 2nd target appears immediately after the 1st target (i.e., at Lag 1) than if distractor stimuli intervene. As this phenomenon comes with a strong tendency to confuse the order of the targets, it seems to be due to the integration of both targets into the same attentional episode or object file. The authors investigated the degree to which people can control the temporal extension of their (episodic) integration windows by manipulating the expectations participants had with regard to the time available for target processing. As predicted, expecting more time to process increased the number of order confusions at Lag 1. This was true for between-subjects and within-subjects (trial-to-trial) manipulations, suggesting that integration windows can be adapted actively and rather quickly.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 06/2008; 34(3):569-77. · 3.06 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Two experiments investigated the capacity demands of stimulus and response priming in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. Three targets were presented in a stream of visual symbols: The first two (T1 and T2) required an unspeeded manual response at the end of the trial, but the third (T3) called for an immediate,speeded manual response. T2 and T3 either were identical (fully compatible), required the same response (response compatible), or required different responses (incompatible). Priming in the fully compatible condition depended strongly on successful identification of the priming stimulus, whereas response-based priming was observed regardless of whether the prime could be reported or not. These findings suggest that stimulus coding and response coding are automatic processes, unaffected by attentional capacity constraints, followed by capacity-limited stimulus consolidation and response selection. Moreover, even though response codes are activated automatically upon stimulus processing, both types of codes act, and affect behavior, independently.
Perception & Psychophysics 11/2007; 69(7):1152-61. · 1.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Theories of selective attention often have a central memory component, which is commonly thought to be limited in some way and is thereby a potential bottleneck in the attentional process. There have been only a few attempts to validate this assertion, and they have produced mixed results. This study presents a specific examination of the link between working memory and attention by engaging active rather than passive memory operations. Two experiments are reported that provide evidence for the involvement of working memory in the attentional blink (AB) phenomenon. Memory loads of increasing size had a detrimental effect on attentional performance within the blink-sensitive interval, but not beyond. Speeded response requirements proved to modulate the AB, but were independent from the memory load effect. Theoretical implications for current models of selective attention are discussed.
Memory & Cognition 07/2007; 35(4):621-7. · 1.92 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We investigated whether it is possible to control the temporal window of attention used to rapidly integrate visual information. To study the underlying neural mechanisms, we recorded ERPs in an attentional blink task, known to elicit Lag-1 sparing. Lag-1 sparing fosters joint integration of the two targets, evidenced by increased order errors. Short versus long integration windows were induced by showing participants mostly fast or slow stimuli. Participants expecting slow speed used a longer integration window, increasing joint integration. Difference waves showed an early (200 ms post-T2) negative and a late positive modulation (390 ms) in the fast group, but not in the slow group. The modulations suggest the creation of a separate event for T2, which is not needed in the slow group, where targets were often jointly integrated. This suggests that attention can be guided by global expectations of presentation speed within tens of milliseconds.
Psychophysiology 06/2007; 44(3):383-91. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Short-term memory (STM) has often been considered to be a central resource in cognition. This study addresses its role in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) tasks tapping into temporal attention—the attentional blink (AB). Various STM operations are tested for their impact on performance and, in particular, on the AB. Memory tasks were found to exert considerable impact on general performance but the size of the AB was more or less immune to manipulations of STM load. Likewise, the AB was unaffected by manipulating the match between items held in STM and targets or temporally close distractors in the RSVP stream. The emerging picture is that STM resources, or their lack, play no role in the AB. Alternative accounts assuming serial consolidation, selection for action, and distractor-induced task-set interference are discussed.
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology - EUR J COGN PSYCHOL. 01/2006; 18(4):520-536.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: When people monitor a visual stream of rapidly presented stimuli for two targets (T1 and T2), they often miss T2 if it falls into a time window of about half a second after T1 onset--the attentional blink. However, if T2 immediately follows T1, performance is often reported being as good as that at long lags--the so-called Lag-1 sparing effect. Two experiments investigated the mechanisms underlying this effect. Experiment 1 showed that, at Lag 1, requiring subjects to correctly report both identity and temporal order of targets produces relatively good performance on T2 but relatively bad performance on T1. Experiment 2 confirmed that subjects often confuse target order at short lags, especially if the two targets are equally easy to discriminate. Results suggest that, if two targets appear in close succession, they compete for attentional resources. If the two competitors are of unequal strength the stronger one is more likely to win and be reported at the expense of the other. If the two are equally strong, however, they will often be integrated into the same attentional episode and thus get both access to attentional resources. But this comes with a cost, as it eliminates information about the targets' temporal order.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 12/2005; 58(8):1415-33. · 2.45 Impact Factor
