-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) represents one of the most severe consequences of drug-resistant epilepsy, for which no evidence-based prevention is available. Development of effective prevention will depend on the following: (1) better understanding of the pathophysiology of SUDEP to define the most appropriate targets of intervention, and (2) identification of risk factors for SUDEP that would allow for the design of feasible clinical trials to test targeted interventions in high-risk populations. The most important known risk factor is the occurrence and frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS), a seizure type that triggers the majority of witnessed SUDEP. Therefore, one likely way to prevent SUDEP is to minimize the risk of GTCS with optimal medical management and patient education. However, whether one might prevent SUDEP in patients with refractory epilepsy by using more frequent review of antiepileptic treatment and earlier referral for presurgical evaluation, remains to be seen. Another hypothetical strategy to prevent SUDEP is to reduce the risk of GTCS-induced postictal respiratory distress. This might be achieved by using lattice pillow, providing nocturnal supervision, reinforcing interictal serotoninergic tone, and lowering opiate- or adenosine-induced postictal brainstem depression. Promising interventions can be tested first on surrogate markers, such as postictal hypoxia in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs), before SUDEP trials can be implemented. EMU safety should also be improved to avoid SUDEP occurrence in that setting. Finally, the development of ambulatory SUDEP prevention devices should be encouraged but raises a number of unsolved issues.
Epilepsia 05/2013; 54 Suppl 2:23-8. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a category of death in people with epilepsy occurring in the absence of a known structural cause of death and is most likely heterogeneous with regard to mechanisms and circumstances. SUDEP is particularly difficult to investigate in research studies for several reasons, including its relatively low incidence, its unpredictable occurrence often in unwitnessed settings, and its low rate of complete autopsy examinations. Over the past two decades, two complementary definitions have been used in most SUDEP studies, but often with variations. We propose here a unified SUDEP definition and classification to resolve current ambiguities and to retrieve cases that would not have been further studied if the previous definitions were used. The proposed Unified SUDEP Definition and Classification contains, in addition to concepts inherent in the previous definitions, nine main recommendations. (1) The word "unexpected," and not the word "unexplained," should be uniformly used in the term SUDEP. (2) The SUDEP category should be applied when appropriate, whether or not a terminal seizure is known to have occurred. (3) The "Possible SUDEP" category should be used only for cases with competing causes of death, with cases left unclassified when data are insufficient to reasonably permit their classification. (4) Cases that would otherwise fulfill the definition of SUDEP should be designated as "SUDEP Plus" when evidence indicates that a preexisting condition, known before or after autopsy, could have contributed to the death, which otherwise is classified as SUDEP (e.g., coronary insufficiency with no evidence of myocardial infarction or long-QT syndrome with no documented primary ventricular arrhythmia leading to death). (5) To be considered SUDEP, the death should have occurred within 1 h from the onset of a known terminal event. (6) For status epilepticus as an exclusion criterion for SUDEP, the duration of seizure activity should be 30 min or more. (7) A specific category of SUDEP due to asphyxia should not be designated, the distinction being largely impractical on circumstantial or autopsy evidence, with more than one mechanism likely to be contributory in many cases. (8) Death occurring in water but without circumstantial or autopsy evidence of submersion should be classified as "Possible SUDEP." If any evidence of submersion is present, the death should not be classified as SUDEP. (9) A category of "Near-SUDEP" should be agreed to include cases in which cardiorespiratory arrest was reversed by resuscitation efforts with subsequent survival for more than 1 h. Scenarios that demonstrate the basis for each SUDEP category are described. If disagreement exists about which category fits a particular case, we suggest the use of consensus decision by a panel of informed reviewers to adjudicate the classification of the case.
Epilepsia 12/2011; 53(2):227-33. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To report mortality, after a longer interval, in a cohort of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy treated by temporal lobe surgery between 1975 and 1995. A previous audit of these patients ending December 1, 1997 observed a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of 4.5.
We analyzed mortality in a cohort of 306 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who underwent temporal lobe resections between December 1, 1975 and December 1, 1995. Deaths occurring after December 1,1997 and until December 1, 2009 were evaluated. Medical records, death certificates, postmortem examination reports, coroner officer's reports, and coroner's inquest reports were sought, and causes of death were ascertained. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) cases were identified.
In 3,569 person-years of follow-up 19 deaths occurred, [SMR 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-3.13], 14 men (SMR 2.01, 95% CI 1.19-3.39) and 5 women (SMR 1.68, 95% CI 0.70-4.03). On analysis of subgroups, SMRs were significantly elevated in patients with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) (SMR 2.50, 95% CI 1.38-4.51), men with MTS (SMR 3.12, 95% CI 1.56-6.25), men with nonspecific lesions (SMR 2.68, 95% CI 1.00-7.09), and right-sided resections in MTS (SMR 3.33, 95% CI 1.39-8.00). During follow-up, six SUDEP cases were observed with a rate of 1/595 person-years.
In this cohort, the risk for premature death in patients undergoing TLE surgery decreased over time but remained above the standard population. Men had a slightly higher risk than women, as did right-sided resections in MTS, confirming this observation in the original cohort. Although lower, the risk of SUDEP remained. Without up-to-date information on seizure outcome, we were unable to directly relate this to mortality.
Epilepsia 11/2011; 53(2):267-71. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) has on rare occasions occurred during electroencephalography (EEG) telemetry, and in such cases postictal EEG suppression (PI EEG-SUP) was frequently observed. More recently a retrospective case-control study reported this pattern as a risk factor for SUDEP. We retrospectively audited frequency and electroclinical features of this pattern as well as immediate management following tonic-clonic seizures during telemetry. Forty-eight patients with tonic-clonic seizures were identified from 470 consecutive EEG-videotelemetry reports. Thirteen patients (27%) with PI EEG-SUP (mean duration 38.1 s, range 6-69 s, median 38 s) were compared to 12 randomly selected controls. One seizure was analyzed per individual. Those with PI EEG-SUP were significantly more likely to be motionless after the seizure and have simple nursing interventions performed (suction, oxygen administration, placed in recovery position, vital signs checked). This pattern is relatively common and requires further study as a potential marker for increased mortality in epilepsy.
Epilepsia 11/2011; 53(2):e21-4. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques 09/2011; 38(5):765-7. · 0.97 Impact Factor
-
Practical Neurology 08/2011; 11(4):256-8.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We have investigated seven voltage-gated sodium channel genes for association with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). Probands and control DNA were grouped into pools and used to screen 85 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), mostly HapMap SNPs tagging the common variation in these genes. Twelve SNPs exhibiting an allele frequency difference between pools were genotyped individually in our sample of 232 probands, 313 controls, and 95 parent-proband trios. Two SNPs, in SCN1A and SCN8A, were associated by allele and genotype at nominal level of significance, but were not significant after Bonferroni correction. Two SCN2A SNPs (rs3943809 and rs16850331) were associated by case-control with a subgroup with IGE and history of febrile seizures and also by transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) in parent-proband trios. Both SNPs are part of a linkage disequilibrium (LD) cluster of 38 SNPs, but none are obvious functional variants. The association of rs3943809 with the febrile seizure subgroup (p = 0.0004) remains significant after the conservative Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.
Epilepsia 04/2010; 51(4):694-8. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: SUDEP remains a significant clinical problem, which, in the authors' opinion, is to some extent potentially preventable. Research needs to focus on interventions that may alter risk. Some wide-ranging suggestions for future developments that in time can translate to clinical practice have been presented. These suggestions, the authors believe, give rise to cautious optimism.
Neurologic Clinics 11/2009; 27(4):1063-74. · 2.34 Impact Factor
-
Barry A Chioza,
Jean Aicardi,
Harald Aschauer,
Oebele Brouwer,
Petra Callenbach,
Athanasios Covanis,
Joseph M Dooley,
Olivier Dulac,
Martina Durner,
Orvar Eeg-Olofsson, [......],
Marianne Juel Kjeldsen,
Rima Nabbout, Lina Nashef,
Thomas Sander,
Auli Sirén,
Elaine Wirrell,
Paul McKeigue,
Robert Robinson,
R Mark Gardiner,
Kate V Everett
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is an idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE) characterised by typical absence seizures manifested by transitory loss of awareness with 2.5-4 Hz spike-wave complexes on ictal EEG. A genetic component to the aetiology is well recognised but the mechanism of inheritance and the genes involved are yet to be fully established. A genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based high density linkage scan was carried out using 41 nuclear pedigrees with at least two affected members. Multipoint parametric and non-parametric linkage analyses were performed using MERLIN 1.1.1 and a susceptibility locus was identified on chromosome 3p23-p14 (Z(mean)=3.9, p<0.0001; HLOD=3.3, alpha=0.7). The linked region harbours the functional candidate genes TRAK1 and CACNA2D2. Fine-mapping using a tagSNP approach demonstrated disease association with variants in TRAK1.
Epilepsy research 10/2009; 87(2-3):247-55. · 2.48 Impact Factor
-
The Lancet Neurology 03/2009; 8(2):132-133. · 23.46 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Familial febrile seizures occur in both generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) and autosomal dominant febrile seizures (ADFS). The literature largely separates families with GEFS+ from those with ADFS. However, there is clinical overlap, and families with ADFS also include individuals with afebrile seizures. The phenotypic spectrum of GEFS+ is broader now than when first described, resulting in unclear boundaries between these two familial syndromes. The purpose of this report is to highlight the phenotypic similarities of GEFS+ and ADFS. A multigenerational family with febrile and afebrile seizures is described and the clinical features are compared to those of previously reported GEFS+ and ADFS families. This family meets the requirements for both ADFS and the broader definition of GEFS+. Linkage analysis has shown no clear linkage to known febrile seizure or GEFS+ loci. Despite locus heterogeneity, identified mutations in reported GEFS+ have so far all been in sodium channel or gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-receptor genes, with other modifier genes postulated to affect individual phenotypes. The two mutations identified in families with ADFS are in genes implicated in GEFS+, SCN1A, and GABRG2. We conclude that it is inappropriate to separate GEFS+ and ADFS at present given the clinical and genotypic overlap.
Epilepsia 12/2008; 50(4):937-42. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although largely neglected in earlier literature, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the most important epilepsy-related mode of death, and is the leading cause of death in people with chronic uncontrolled epilepsy. Research during the past two to three decades has shown that incidence varies substantially depending on the epilepsy population studied, ranging from 0.09 per 1000 patient-years in newly diagnosed patients to 9 per 1000 patient-years in candidates for epilepsy surgery. Risk profiles have been delineated in case-control studies. These and other studies indicate that SUDEP mainly occurs in the context of a generalised tonic-clonic seizure. However, it remains unclear why a seizure becomes fatal in a person that might have had many similar seizures in the past. Here, we review SUDEP rates, risk factors, triggers, and proposed mechanisms, and critically assess potential preventive strategies. Gaps in knowledge are discussed and ways forward are suggested.
The Lancet Neurology 10/2008; 7(11):1021-31. · 23.46 Impact Factor
-
Epilepsia 03/2008; 49(2):360-5. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In a cohort of 275 Caucasians with a broad IGE phenotype, patients with absences were classified. Criteria of the 1989 Commission on Classification of the International League Against Epilepsy for Childhood Absence Epilepsy (CAE 1989 criteria) were compared with the stricter criteria of the ILAE Task Force for Classification and Terminology (CAE 2005 criteria). Among the 129 patients with absences without significant myoclonus, 50 had juvenile absence epilepsy 44 had CAE according to the CAE 1989 criteria and only 30 had CAE according to the CAE 2005 criteria. We found a significantly better outcome in patients considered as CAE by the CAE 2005 criteria, compared with those excluded. Strict criteria for classification of absence syndromes leave many patients unclassified. However, diagnostic criteria used to classify CAE patients have prognostic significance. We propose that patients are classified as having benign CAE or as having CAE with the adverse prognostic factors indicated.
Epilepsia 12/2007; 48(11):2187-90. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
Sanjay Sisodiya,
J Helen Cross,
Ingmar Blümcke,
David Chadwick,
John Craig,
Peter B Crino,
Paul Debenham,
Norman Delanty,
Frances Elmslie,
Mark Gardiner, [......], Lina Nashef,
Jeffrey L Noebels,
Ruth Ottman,
Munir Pirmohamed,
Asla Pitkänen,
Ingrid Scheffer,
Simon Shorvon,
Graeme Sills,
Nicholas Wood,
Sameer Zuberi
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Sixth Epilepsy Research Foundation workshop, held in Oxford in March 2006, brought together basic scientists, geneticists, epidemiologists, statisticians, pharmacologists and clinicians to consider progress, issues and strategies for harnessing genetics to improve the understanding and treatment of the epilepsies. General principles were considered, including the fundamental importance of clear study design, adequate patient numbers, defi ned phenotypes, robust statistical data handling, and follow-up of genetic discoveries. Topics where some progress had been made were considered including chromosomal abnormalities, neurodevelopment, hippocampal sclerosis, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, focal cortical dysplasia and pharmacogenetics. The ethical aspects of epilepsy genetics were reviewed. Principles and limitations of collaboration were discussed. Presentations and their matched discussions are produced here. There was optimism that further genetic research in epilepsy was not only feasible, but might lead to improvements in the lives of people with epilepsy.
Epileptic disorders: international epilepsy journal with videotape 07/2007; 9(2):194-236. · 1.50 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: People with epilepsy may die suddenly and unexpectedly without a structural pathological cause. Most SUDEP cases are likely to be related to seizures. SUDEP incidence varies and is <1:1,000 person-years among prevalent cases in the community and approximately 1:250 person years in specialist centres. Case-control studies identified certain risk factors, some potentially amenable to manipulation, including uncontrolled convulsive seizures and factors relating to treatment and supervision. Both respiratory and cardiac mechanisms are important. The apparent protective effect of lay supervision supports an important role for respiratory factors, in part amenable to intervention by simple measures. Whereas malignant tachyarrhythmias are rare during seizures, sinus bradycardia/arrest, although infrequent, is well documented. Both types of arrhythmias can have a genetic basis. This article reviews SUDEP and explores the potential of coexisting liability to cardiac arrhythmias as a contributory factor, while acknowledging that at present, bridging evidence between cardiac inherited gene determinants and SUDEP is lacking.
Epilepsia 05/2007; 48(5):859-71. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We have investigated the reported association (p = 0.019) between the A118G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the opioid receptor micro subunit gene (OPRM1) and idiopathic absence epilepsy (IAE). Five SNPs, including A118G, were investigated by association studies in a sample of 240 probands with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), including 110 with IAE, and 257 controls. No significant association was found for A118G with IGE or IAE. The difference between the two studies was in the control samples that had significantly different allele frequencies (p = 0.00005), suggesting that population stratification may explain the earlier significant association with IAE. In the current study, none of the other four SNPs was significantly associated with IGE or IAE. Our results provide no support for association of A118G with either IAE or IGE and also exclude association in our sample of a small-to-moderate gene effect with IGE from a large part of OPRM1.
Epilepsia 11/2006; 47(10):1728-31. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
Epilepsia 10/2006; 47(10):1757 - 1758. · 3.96 Impact Factor
-
Neurology 03/2005; 64(3):579. · 8.31 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The incidence of renal stone disease in patients receiving topiramate (Topamax) is 2-4 times that expected in the background population. This has been attributed to a weak carbonic anhydrase inhibitor effect, but published data are scant. Following three cases of renal stones in patients receiving topiramate, we evaluated biochemical risk for nephrolithiasis in eight further unselected patients. Most patients demonstrated inadequate urinary acidification and hypocitraturia; in some cases citrate was undetectable. Several patients also had other risk factors for nephrolithiasis, including increased urinary sodium, calcium and oxalate excretion. The biochemical changes induced by topiramate appear highly penetrant. Experience with this drug is relatively short-lived and it is being prescribed for long-term use in (often) relatively young patients. This report highlights the significantly increased metabolic risk of stone formation in patients receiving topiramate.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 04/2004; 41(Pt 2):166-9. · 2.17 Impact Factor
