-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine if there was a significant association between the presence of altered mouth and taste sensations with oral carriage of yeasts and to assess the factors that influence the yeast carriage.
The oral and dental status including unstimulated (USFR) and stimulated (SSFR) whole salivary flow rates of a total of 509 subjects was recorded. Saliva specimens were collected for microbiologic examination. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any factors that were significantly associated with the prevalence of oral yeasts.
Old age, clinical signs of oral dryness, denture wearing, and a reduction in USFR increased the prevalence of yeasts, whereas patient gender, levels of dentition, the sensation of dry or burning mouth, taste disorders, and SSFR were not associated with increased prevalence of oral yeasts.
An increased prevalence of oral yeasts was not found to relate to changes in mouth sensation alone. Other factors, most notably patient age, the wearing of dentures, clinical signs of oral dryness, and salivary flow rate under rest conditions, were, however, found to be closely associated with oral yeast carriage.
Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics 05/2008; 105(4):445-51. · 1.50 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare postoperative maxillary stability following Le Fort I osteotomy for the correction of occlusal cant as compared with conventional Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement.
The subjects were 40 Japanese adults with jaw deformities. Of these, 20 underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) to correct asymmetric skeletal morphology and inclined occlusal cant. The other 20 patients underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) to advance the maxilla. Lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms were taken postoperatively and assessed statistically. Thereafter, the 2 groups were followed for time-course changes.
There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to time-course changes during the immediate postoperative period.
This suggests that maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy for cant correction does not differ from that after Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement.
Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics 08/2007; 104(1):38-43. · 1.50 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare objectively, the recovery of hypoestheia of the lower lip following orthognathic surgery using different procedures (sagittal split ramus osteotomy [SSRO]) and intra-oral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO)) and fixation methods (monocortical plate fixation and bi-cortical plate fixation). Hypoesthesia was evaluated using the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential (TSEP).
The subjects consisted of 174 patients (348 sides) with mandibular prognathism with or without asymmetry, who underwent mandibular ramus osteotomies using different fixation types. The patients were divided into 4 groups. The OAM group consisted of 128 sides who had SSRO using the Obwegeser method with mono-cortical absorbable plate fixation, the ODTM group consisted of 84 sides who had the Obwegeser-Dal Pont method with mono-cortical titanium plate fixation, the OTB group consisted of 32 sides who had the Obwegeser method with bi-cortical titanium plate fixation and the VO group consisted of 104 sides who underwent IVRO according to the Bell method without fixation. Trigeminal nerve hypoestheia at the region of the lower lip was assessed bilaterally by the TSEP method. An electroencephalograph recording system (Neuropack Sigma; Nion Koden Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze the potentials. Each patient was evaluated pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 1 and 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year.
The mean measurable period and standard deviation of TSEP of the lower lip in the OAM group was 5.2 +/- 9.9 weeks, 10.9 +/- 13.1 weeks in the ODTM group, 7.8 +/- 4.5 weeks in the OTB group, and 2.5 +/- 6.3 weeks in the VO group. There were significant differences between the OAM and ODTM groups (P < .0001), the ODTM and OTB groups (P = .0001), the OTB and VO groups (P = .0221), the OAM and VO groups (P < .0001), and the ODTM and VO groups (P < .0001).
This study proved using objective measurements that the recovery period from hypoesthesia of the lower lip following orthognathic surgery was dependent on the surgical procedure. Recovery in lower lip hypoesthesia after IVRO was significantly earlier than SSRO.
Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics 08/2007; 104(2):177-85. · 1.50 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate hypoesthesia of the upper lip following Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with mandibular osteotomy with trigeminal somatosensory evoked potential (TSEP).
The subjects consisted of 25 patients with mandibular prognathism with maxillary retrognathism mandibular prognathism with or without asymmetry, who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) or intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). Trigeminal nerve hypoesthesia at the region of the upper lip was assessed bilaterally by the TSEP method. The electrodes were placed exactly above the highest point of the vermilion border and on the mucosa of the upper lip. An electroencephalograph recording system (Neuropack Sigma; Nihon Koden Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze the potentials. Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and then postoperatively at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.
The average measurable period and standard deviation of TSEP of the upper lip was 7.8 +/- 10.7 weeks following Le Fort I osteotomy, TSEP of the lower lip was 4.6 +/- 9.2 weeks in the patients who underwent SSRO with Le Fort I osteotomy, and 1.2 +/- 0.4 weeks in the patients who underwent IVRO with Le Fort I osteotomy.
This study objectively proved that hypoesthesia could appear in the upper lips following Le Fort I osteotomy with TSEP. The measurable period for the upper lip following Le Fort I osteotomy tended to be longer than that for the lower lip in the patients who underwent SSRO and IVRO with Le Fort I osteotomy.
Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics 03/2007; 103(2):169-74. · 1.50 Impact Factor
