James A Johnson

The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Are you James A Johnson?

Claim your profile

Publications (92)182.55 Total impact

  • Article: Validation of a finite element model of the human elbow for determining cartilage contact mechanics.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is important to study joint contact mechanics to better understand the processes which lead to cartilage degradation. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a finite element (FE) model of a human elbow capable of predicting joint contact area and stress. A cylindrical constrained elbow joint loading apparatus was used to measure the cartilage compression and contact area for a single cadaveric specimen. A computer model of the same joint was created based on computed tomography images of the specimen, and the same loading was simulated using FE contact analysis. The model-predicted joint compression and contact area corresponded closely with experiment-measured results (differences of -4.9% and +9.6%). A sensitivity analysis showed that the model results were sensitive to cartilage and bone material properties, as well as the cartilage thickness distribution. The results of this study underline the importance of using accurate material properties and physiological cartilage thickness distributions when simulating cartilage contact mechanics.
    Journal of biomechanics 05/2013; · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • Article: The bicipital tuberosity and distal radius are unreliable landmarks for radial head implant alignment.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: As more anatomic asymmetric radial head implants emerge, it is necessary to determine the optimal landmarks to ensure correct rotational orientation. The bicipital tuberosity and distal radius are possible bony landmarks that can be used for rotational alignment of asymmetric prostheses; however, they have not been validated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the bicipital tuberosity and distal radius as rotational landmarks for orientation of asymmetric radial head prostheses. METHODS: Measurements were made from computer tomography scans of 50 elbows in order to determine the rotational relationships between the radial head, bicipital tuberosity, biceps tendon footprint, and distal radius. RESULTS: The maximum radial head diameter was oriented 65° ± 28° from the bicipital tuberosity, 119° ± 38° from the biceps tendon footprint, 82° ± 29° from the radial styloid, and 76° ± 28° from the volar surface of the distal radius. All of these landmarks had a significantly greater variance than a proposed acceptable clinical tolerance of 10° (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the measured landmarks show no consistent rotational relationship with the maximum diameter of the radial head. In order to maximize the utility of more anatomic asymmetric radial head implant systems, further studies are necessary to identify more reliable rotational landmarks to ensure optimal implant positioning.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 05/2013; · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Article: Classic Versus Congruent Coracoid Positioning During the Latarjet Procedure: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare the classic Latarjet technique and congruent-arc modification with respect to glenohumeral stability, joint stiffness, translation, and range of motion. METHODS: Eight cadaveric forequarters were tested on a shoulder simulator that applied loads independently to the conjoint tendon, long head of biceps, rotator cuff, and deltoid. The test conditions included: intact, 30% glenoid defect, and reconstruction of the defect with the classic and congruent Latarjets. The Latarjet techniques were randomly ordered, with the outcome variables being anterior dislocation, glenohumeral translation, rotational range of motion, and joint stiffness. RESULTS: All 8 specimens dislocated after creation of a 30% glenoid defect. The classic Latarjet stabilized 7 of 8 specimens, whereas the congruent-arc modification stabilized all specimens (8/8). In abduction neutral rotation, there was no difference in joint translation between techniques (P = .613). In abduction external rotation, there was significantly greater anterior humeral head translation after the congruent technique than after the classic (9.9 and 6.5 mm, respectively, P = .013). Rotational range of motion was significantly reduced after classic (-25.8°) and congruent (-22.2°) transfers as compared with the 30% defect (P ≤ .041). Joint stiffness in the abducted, externally rotated position was significantly reduced in the 30% defect as compared with intact (P = .012), congruent (P = .015), and classic (P < .001) conditions. In all abduction positions, the intact was not significantly different from the Latarjet techniques, and the techniques did not significantly differ from each other (P ≥ .102). CONCLUSIONS: The classic and congruent-arc Latarjet techniques restore shoulder stability and motion in cases of considerable bone loss. The techniques do not substantially differ in rotational range of motion or joint stiffness. The congruent-arc technique, however, does result in significantly greater anterior humeral head translation, as compared with the classic technique, before reaching a stable non-dislocated endpoint. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: On the basis of this biomechanical model, both the classic and congruent-arc Latarjet techniques can be used to stabilize a shoulder with substantial glenoid bone loss. Further clinical and biomechanical studies are required to determine if particular clinical circumstances exist where 1 technique has an advantage over the other.
    Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 01/2013; · 3.02 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effect of implant design of linked total elbow arthroplasty on stability and stress: a finite element analysis.
    Ryan Willing, Graham J W King, James A Johnson
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several linked total elbow arthroplasty designs exist, which function similar to a loose hinge joint. Constraint behaviour is an important design consideration, as it affects joint stability, or how much secondary [e.g. varus-valgus (VV)] motion is permitted. Implant durability is also a concern, as bearing failures have been reported. This finite element analysis investigates the constraint characteristics and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene bearing stresses of three linked elbow design concepts [cylindrical (CY), hourglass (HG) and concave cylinder (CC)]. The bearing of the CY design was subjected to elevated Von Mises stresses (2.1-5.4 times higher than the HG and CC designs) due to edge loading. The HG design maintained low stresses, but was unable to provide consistent VV stability. The CC design also maintained low stresses while providing consistent VV stability. These results suggest that CC designs may provide better stability characteristics and durability in vivo, compared to the other two designs.
    Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 11/2012; · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • Article: The shoulder remplissage procedure for Hill-Sachs defects: does technique matter?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: This biomechanical study evaluated the effects of 3 remplissage techniques on shoulder stability and motion in a Hill-Sachs (HS) instability model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaveric forequarters were tested on an active shoulder simulator. Three remplissage techniques were performed for 15% and 30% HS defects. Testing conditions included intact and 15% and 30% HS defects, and the 3 remplissage techniques: T1, anchors in the defect valley; T2, anchors in humeral head rim; and T3, anchors in valley with medial suture placement. Outcomes included stability, internal-external rotation range of motion (IE-ROM), and joint stiffness. RESULTS: All remplissage techniques improved shoulder stability. In 15% HS defects tested in adduction, T3 significantly reduced IE-ROM (P = .037), whereas T1 and T2 did also (mean IE-ROM reductions: T1, 14°; T2, 11°; T3, 21°), but not to significance (P ≥ .088). In abduction, no significant reductions in IE-ROM occurred (P ≥ .060). In 30% HS defects tested in adduction (mean reduction IE-ROM: T1, 11°; T2, 19°; T3, 28°) and abduction (mean reduction: T1, 9°; T2, 15°; T3, 21°), all techniques significantly reduced IE-ROM (P ≤ .046). All techniques increased joint stiffness from 100% to 320% beyond the Bankart repair alone. A significant increase in joint stiffness was observed for T3 compared with the 30% HS group (P = .004), whereas T2 trended toward an increase (P = .078). There was no significant increase in joint stiffness with T1 (P = .249). CONCLUSIONS: All remplissage techniques enhanced shoulder stability, restricted ROM, and increased joint stiffness. No significant differences were found between anchors placed in the valley (T1) vs those placed in the humeral head rim (T2). Medial suture placement (T3) resulted in the greatest joint stiffness values and mean restriction in motion.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 10/2012; · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Article: Do the Traditional and Modified Latarjet Techniques Produce Equivalent Reconstruction Stability and Strength?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The Latarjet procedure has been described as a reconstructive option for instability associated with substantial glenoid bone defects. A modification, termed the Congruent-Arc, is thought to improve glenoid reconstruction through better articular congruency and greater bone reconstitution. The strengths of these techniques, however, have not been reported.Purpose/ HYPOTHESIS:To compare the fixation stability, strength, glenoid vault load transfer, and joint contact between the Classic and Congruent-Arc techniques. The authors hypothesized that the Classic Latarjet would exhibit inferior joint contact characteristics while having greater stability and strength and more normal glenoid vault strain. STUDY DESIGN:Controlled laboratory study. METHODS:Sixteen shoulder specimens (8 pairs) were tested by loading the glenohumeral joint with the glenoid intact, following creation of a 25% anterior bone defect, and after random assignment to the Classic or Congruent-Arc Latarjet techniques. Specimens were mounted to a testing apparatus that allowed concentric, centralized loading and loading 30° anterior on the glenoid rim. Cyclic loading (100 cycles at 1 Hz) was applied with a staircase protocol (50, 100, 150, and 200 N). Graft interface displacement and glenoid load transfer, quantified in terms of strain, were recorded during loading. Contact was quantified during 50-N loading using a thin pressure sensor. After cyclic loading, specimens were loaded to failure, defined as 5 mm of graft interface displacement. RESULTS:The 30° loading ≥100 N resulted in significantly greater graft displacement (P < .004) in the Congruent-Arc group as compared with the Classic (mean displacement range, 0.9-2.6 vs 0.1-0.5 mm, respectively). Failure testing yielded a significantly (P = .010) greater ultimate strength for the Classic (557 N) as compared with the Congruent-Arc (392 N). Load-transfer measurements demonstrated that neither technique's glenoid vault strain values significantly differed from intact (P ≥ .076). Both techniques resulted in contact areas significantly less than intact (P < .035); however, the Congruent-Arc trended toward better contact characteristics (P = .074). CONCLUSION:The Congruent-Arc results in significantly poorer fixation stability as compared with the Classic technique but did more closely reproduce intact joint contact, which may yield more favorable long-term outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:Care must be taken in balancing the consideration of initial fixation stability and joint contact for the Congruent-Arc and Classic Latarjet, as these factors have opposing implications for each of the 2 reconstructions' outcomes.
    The American journal of sports medicine 09/2012; · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • Article: Does the dynamic sling effect of the Latarjet procedure improve shoulder stability? A biomechanical evaluation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Glenohumeral instability with glenoid bone loss is commonly treated with the Latarjet procedure. The procedure involves transfer of the coracoid and conjoint tendon, which is thought to provide a stabilizing sling effect; however, its significance is unknown. This study evaluated the effects of the Latarjet procedure, with and without conjoint tendon loading, on shoulder stability and range of motion (ROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A custom simulator was used to evaluate anterior shoulder stability and ROM in 8 cadaveric shoulders. Testing conditions included intact, 30% glenoid defect, and Latarjet with and without conjoint loading. Unloaded and 10-N loaded states were tested in adduction and 90° abduction. Outcome variables included dislocation, stiffness (neutral and 60° external rotation), and internal-external rotational ROM. RESULTS: All 30% defects dislocated in abduction external rotation. The loaded Latarjet prevented dislocation in all specimens, whereas the unloaded Latarjet stabilized 6 of 8 specimens. In abduction external rotation, there were no significant differences in stiffness between loaded and unloaded transfers (P = .176). In adduction, there were no significant differences between the intact and the loaded Latarjet (P ≥ .228); however, in neutral rotation, the unloaded Latarjet (P = .015) and the 30% defects (P = .011) were significantly less stiff. Rotational ROM in abduction was significantly reduced with the loaded Latarjet (P = .014) compared with unloaded Latarjet, and no differences were found in adduction. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that glenohumeral stability is improved, but not fully restored to intact, with conjoint tendon loading. The results support the existence of the sling effect and its importance in augmenting stability provided by the transferred coracoid.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 09/2012; · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Article: Rehabilitation of the Medial- and Lateral Collateral Ligament-deficient Elbow: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In vitro biomechanical research using an elbow motion simulator. The optimal rehabilitation of elbow dislocations with medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries has not been defined. To determine a safe rehabilitation protocol for elbow dislocations with MCL and LCL injuries. Eight cadaveric elbows underwent simulated active and passive motions with the arm in multiple orientations. Varus-valgus angulation and internal-external rotation of the ulna relative to the humerus were quantified for the intact joint and with injured MCL and LCL. Active motion with injured MCL and LCL in the horizontal and vertical orientations resulted in kinematics similar to the intact elbow, whereas passive motion resulted in significant kinematic alterations. Marked elbow instability was noted in the varus and valgus orientations using both active and passive motion. Elbows with MCL and LCL injuries should be rehabilitated using active motion in the horizontal or vertical orientations. Basic science research.
    Journal of Hand Therapy 09/2012; 25(4):363-73. · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • Article: Kinematics and laxity of a linked total elbow arthroplasty following computer navigated implant positioning.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aseptic loosening in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains the most common cause of long-term failure. While several different mechanisms of implant loosening have been suggested, it is likely that one important underlying cause is implant malpositioning, resulting in changes in joint kinematics and loading. Although use of computer navigation has been shown to improve component positioning in other joints, no such system currently exists for the elbow. This study used real-time computer feedback for humeral, ulnar, and radial component positioning in 11 cadaveric extremities. An elbow motion simulator evaluated joint kinematics. Endosteal abutment of the stems of the humeral and ulnar components precluded optimal positioning in 5 and 6 specimens, respectively. Loss of the normal valgus angulation following elbow arthroplasty (p < 0.05) suggests that errors in humeral component positioning translate directly into changes in joint kinematics during active motion. These findings suggest that although computer navigation can reproduce normal joint kinematics, optimal implant positioning may require a TEA system which allows for some modularity to accommodate the normal variations in osseous morphology of the elbow.
    Computer Aided Surgery 07/2012; 17(5):249-58. · 0.30 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effect of the remplissage procedure on shoulder stability and range of motion: an in vitro biomechanical assessment.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The remplissage procedure may be performed as an adjunct to Bankart repair to treat recurrent glenohumeral dislocation associated with an engaging Hill-Sachs humeral head defect. The purpose of this in vitro biomechanical study was to examine the effects of the remplissage procedure on glenohumeral joint motion and stability. Cadaveric shoulders (n = 8) were mounted on a biomechanical testing apparatus that applies simulated loads to the rotator cuff and the anterior, middle, and posterior heads of the deltoid muscle. Testing was performed with the shoulder intact, after creation of the Bankart lesion, and after repair of the Bankart lesion. In addition, testing was performed after Bankart repair with and without remplissage in shoulders with 15% and 30% Hill-Sachs defects. Shoulder motion and glenohumeral translation were recorded with an optical tracking system. Outcomes measured included stability (joint stiffness and defect engagement) and internal-external glenohumeral rotational motion in adduction and in 90° of composite shoulder abduction. In specimens with a 15% Hill-Sachs defect, Bankart repair combined with remplissage resulted in a significant reduction in internal-external range of motion in adduction (15.1° ± 11.1°, p = 0.039), but not in abduction (7.7° ± 9.9, p = 0.38), compared with the intact condition. In specimens with a 30% Hill-Sachs defect, repair that included remplissage also significantly reduced internal-external range of motion in adduction (14.5° ± 11.3°, p = 0.049) but not in abduction (6.2° ± 9.3°, p = 0.60). In specimens with a 15% Hill-Sachs defect, addition of remplissage significantly increased joint stiffness compared with isolated Bankart repair (p = 0.038), with the stiffness trending toward surpassing the level in the intact condition (p = 0.060). In specimens with a 30% Hill-Sachs defect, addition of remplissage restored joint stiffness to approximately normal (p = 0.41 compared with the intact condition). All of the specimens with a 30% Hill-Sachs defect engaged and dislocated after Bankart repair alone. The addition of remplissage was effective in preventing engagement and dislocation in all specimens. None of the specimens with a 15% Hill-Sachs defect engaged or dislocated after Bankart repair. In this experimental model, addition of remplissage provided little additional benefit to a Bankart repair in specimens with a 15% Hill-Sachs defect, and it also reduced specific shoulder motions. However, Bankart repair alone was ineffective in preventing engagement and recurrent dislocation in specimens with a 30% Hill-Sachs defect. The addition of remplissage to the Bankart repair in these specimens prevented engagement and enhanced stability, although at the expense of some reduction in shoulder motion.
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 06/2012; 94(11):1003-12. · 3.27 Impact Factor
  • Article: Development of an image-based technique to examine joint congruency at the elbow.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identifying joint contact in articular joints is important for both the biomechanical investigation of joint mechanics and the study of osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study is to develop a proximity mapping technique to non-invasively determine joint congruency, as a surrogate of joint contact. To illustrate the capabilities of this algorithm, a cadaveric upper extremity was positioned at varying degrees of elbow flexion. This technique was validated using a gold standard experimental casting technique. The pattern of the cast showed an excellent agreement with the generated proximity map using the inter-bone distance algorithm. The results from this study agree with the results of previous studies examining joint contact at the elbow both in the location and in the tracking of the joint contact throughout elbow flexion. Ultimately, this technique will lead to an increased understanding of the effect of malalignment and instability of the joint on contact mechanics.
    Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 01/2012; · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • Article: Accuracy assessment of an imaging technique to examine ulnohumeral joint congruency during elbow flexion.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A CT-based imaging technique to investigate ulnohumeral joint congruency of elbows undergoing physiologic flexion is introduced. This technique, which employed landmark registration and a previously developed inter-bone distance algorithm, was validated experimentally. Results obtained with this imaging technique were validated in a single specimen by comparing the resulting joint congruency maps to results obtained with experimental casting in a static position. Additionally, the accuracy of the registration technique was assessed in four specimens using fiducial and target registration error to evaluate the positional and angular accuracy. Preliminary data from an intact cadaveric elbow was shown to demonstrate the utility of this technique. The overall accuracy of the registration was better than 1 mm, and the congruency maps showed excellent correspondence with the casting, validating the use of a CT-based imaging technique to examine the congruency of joints undergoing quasi-static flexion.
    Computer Aided Surgery 01/2012; 17(3):142-52. · 0.30 Impact Factor
  • Article: Moderate to large engaging Hill-Sachs defects: an in vitro biomechanical comparison of the remplissage procedure, allograft humeral head reconstruction, and partial resurfacing arthroplasty.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The management of engaging Hill-Sachs defects (HSD) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare 3 treatment strategies. Eight specimens were tested on a shoulder simulator. The protocol involved testing 2 unrepaired HSD (30% and 45%), which were then treated with remplissage, humeral head allograft (HHA), and partial resurfacing arthroplasty (PRA). Stability (defect engagement and glenohumeral stiffness) and range of motion (ROM) were measured. All 30% and 45% HSDs engaged and dislocated. Remplissage and HHA effectively prevented engagement in all specimens; however, 62% of PRA engaged. No repair exhibited stiffness significantly greater than intact, but 30% and 45% remplissage produced a 74% and 207% increase, respectively, and were significantly greater than the unrepaired states (P ≤ .047). Stiffness results for HHA and PRA closely matched those of intact. In adduction, remplissage reduced internal-external ROM compared with both defects (P ≤ .01), but only 30% remplissage caused a significant decrease compared with intact (P = .049). In abduction, all repairs reduced ROM compared with HSD (P ≤ .04), but none compared with intact (P ≥ 0.05). In extension, remplissage had significantly less ROM than either HHA or PRA (P ≤ .02). All procedures improved stability; however, unlike remplissage, results from HHA and PRA closely resembled intact. Remplissage (30% and 45%) improved stability and eliminated engagement but caused reductions in ROM. HHA and PRA re-established intact ROM, but PRA could not fully prevent engagement. The effects of each technique are not equivalent and further studies are required.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 10/2011; 21(9):1142-51. · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effect of decreasing computed tomography dosage on radiostereometric analysis (RSA) accuracy at the glenohumeral joint.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Standard, beaded radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and markerless RSA often use computed tomography (CT) scans to create three-dimensional (3D) bone models. However, ethical concerns exist due to risks associated with CT radiation exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of decreasing CT dosage on RSA accuracy. Four cadaveric shoulder specimens were scanned using a normal-dose CT protocol and two low-dose protocols, where the dosage was decreased by 89% and 98%. 3D computer models of the humerus and scapula were created using each CT protocol. Bi-planar fluoroscopy was used to image five different static glenohumeral positions and two dynamic glenohumeral movements, of which a total of five static and four dynamic poses were selected for analysis. For standard RSA, negligible differences were found in bead (0.21±0.31mm) and bony landmark (2.31±1.90mm) locations when the CT dosage was decreased by 98% (p-values>0.167). For markerless RSA kinematic results, excellent agreement was found between the normal-dose and lowest-dose protocol, with all Spearman rank correlation coefficients greater than 0.95. Average root mean squared errors of 1.04±0.68mm and 2.42±0.81° were also found at this reduced dosage for static positions. In summary, CT dosage can be markedly reduced when performing shoulder RSA to minimize the risks of radiation exposure. Standard RSA accuracy was negligibly affected by the 98% CT dose reduction and for markerless RSA, the benefits of decreasing CT dosage to the subject outweigh the introduced errors.
    Journal of biomechanics 09/2011; 44(16):2847-50. · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effect of CT dose on glenohumeral joint congruency measurements using 3D reconstructed patient-specific bone models.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study of joint congruency at the glenohumeral joint of the shoulder using computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of joint surfaces is an area of significant clinical interest. However, ionizing radiation delivered to patients during CT examinations is much higher than other types of radiological imaging. The shoulder represents a significant challenge for this modality as it is adjacent to the thyroid gland and breast tissue. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal CT scanning techniques that would minimize radiation dose while accurately quantifying joint congruency of the shoulder. The results suggest that only one-tenth of the standard applied total current (mA) and a pitch ratio of 1.375:1 was necessary to produce joint congruency values consistent with that of the higher dose scans. Using the CT scanning techniques examined in this study, the effective dose applied to the shoulder to quantify joint congruency was reduced by 88.9% compared to standard clinical CT imaging techniques.
    Physics in Medicine and Biology 09/2011; 56(20):6615-24. · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effect of implant malalignment on joint loading in total elbow arthroplasty: an in vitro study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aseptic loosening is one of the leading causes of failure in total elbow arthroplasty. Incorrect implant positioning and alignment in other joints such as the knee have been found to lead to excessive loading and wear. Although similar alignment difficulties exist in the elbow, the effect of implant malalignment on wear-inducing loads is not yet known. This in vitro study determined the effect of anterior malpositioning and varus-valgus and internal-external malrotations on humeral stem loading in total elbow arthroplasty. Computer-navigated linked elbow arthroplasty was conducted in 8 cadaveric elbows. A modular, instrumented humeral component was used to measure loading during simulated elbow motion while the position of the ulna relative to the humerus was recorded. Loading increased for all malaligned implant positions tested (P < .05). During simulation of implant malpositioning, combinations of internal-external and varus-valgus malrotations that tended to preserve the line of action of the elbow flexors had lower loads than combinations that did not. This in vitro study showed that loading does increase after humeral component malalignment; however, further studies are required to determine the long-term effects on polyethylene wear and component loosening.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 08/2011; 21(8):1032-8. · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Article: Reconstruction of the coronoid using an extended prosthesis: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When repair of comminuted coronoid fractures is not possible, prosthetic replacement may restore elbow stability. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to determine whether a coronoid implant with an extended tip would improve elbow stability compared with an anatomic prosthesis in the setting of collateral ligament insufficiency. Passive elbow extension was performed in 7 cadaveric arms in the varus and valgus positions and active and passive extension in the horizontal position by use of an elbow motion simulator. Varus-valgus laxity of the ulna relative to the humerus was quantified with a tracking system with a native coronoid, a 40% coronoid deficiency, an anatomic prosthesis, and an extended prosthesis, with the collateral ligaments sectioned and repaired. Laxity significantly increased after a 40% coronoid deficiency with both repaired and sectioned collateral ligaments (P ≤ .01). With the ligaments repaired, there was no significant difference in laxity between the native coronoid, the anatomic implant, or the extended implant. Ligament sectioning alone produced severe instability, with a mean laxity of 42.75° ± 11.54° (P < .01). With insufficient ligaments, the anatomic prosthesis produced no change in laxity compared with the native coronoid, whereas the extended implant significantly reduced laxity by 21.56° ± 17.70° (P = .02). An anatomic coronoid implant with ligament repair restores stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow to intact levels. In the setting of ligament insufficiency, an extended implant improves stability relative to an anatomic implant, but the elbow remains significantly less stable than an intact elbow. Studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of these designs.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 07/2011; 21(7):969-76. · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effect of triceps repair techniques following olecranon excision on elbow stability and extension strength: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the effect of two types of triceps repair techniques on elbow stability and extension strength in the setting of olecranon deficiency using a cadaveric model. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were tested in an elbow motion simulator, which produced active elbow extension by applying physiological loads to the tendons. Computed tomography-based surface models were used to determine cutting planes corresponding to sequential levels of olecranon resection. Both anterior and posterior triceps repairs were simulated for each level. Progressive sectioning of the olecranon increased elbow laxity for both active and passive extension (P < 0.001). Although the posterior repair resulted in greater laxity than the anterior repair for all but the 50% resection, this difference was small (less than 3°) and not statistically significant for either active (P = 0.2) or passive (P = 0.1) extension. Active extension produced less joint laxity than passive extension for both the anterior (P = 0.007) and posterior (P = 0.001) repairs. The posterior repair provided greater extension strength than the anterior repair at all applied triceps tensions and for all olecranon resections (P = 0.01). Both repairs reduced extension strength relative to the intact state (P < 0.01). Sequential olecranon excision decreased extension strength (P = 0.04); however, there were no differences between resection levels (P > 0.05). On average, there was a loss of extension strength of 24% and 30% for the posterior and anterior repairs, respectively. There was no significant difference in stability between repair techniques. Posterior repair of the triceps after olecranon excision would thus appear to be efficacious as a result of its higher triceps extension strength. However, clinical studies are needed to confirm these in vitro observations.
    Journal of orthopaedic trauma 07/2011; 25(7):420-4. · 1.78 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effect of the conjoined tendon of the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis on shoulder stability and kinematics during in-vitro simulation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The kinematics and stability of the shoulder during in-vitro simulation are affected by the muscles chosen for simulation and their loads. Existing simulators have commonly actuated the rotator cuff and deltoids; however, the contribution of secondary muscles, such as those which form the conjoined tendon, are not well understood. The conjoined tendon consists of the origins of the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis (SH&C), and is thought to produce an anterior stabilizing effect. This study investigated the effect of SH&C tension at four loading levels: 0, 5, 10, 15N. Our primary outcome variable was glenohumeral stiffness for anterior loading but internal/external rotation and extension ranges of motion were also measured. Four joint configurations were tested: adduction and 90° combined abduction, each in neutral and maximal external rotation. Increasing SH&C load resulted in a significant trend of increased glenohumeral stiffness across the average of all joint configurations (p=0.008). In abduction, neutral rotation differences were found between the stiffness at 10 and 15N compared to 0N (p=0.038 and 0.043, respectively); however, no differences were found for the three other joint configurations. There was a tendency for a decrease in the range of shoulder extension with increasing SH&C load, but this did not achieve significance (p=0.065). These findings demonstrate that the SH&C provides a stabilizing barrier effect, but only in configurations when it wraps directly anterior to the humeral head. Thus SH&C loading is likely critical to in-vitro simulation due to its effect on joint stability and kinematics.
    Journal of biomechanics 03/2011; 44(6):1192-5. · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • Article: Stem abutment affects alignment of the humeral component in computer-assisted elbow arthroplasty.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The humeral component in total elbow arthroplasty has limited geometric modularity, and the extent to which this affects accurate positioning is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (1) validate the accuracy of a computer-assisted implant alignment technique, and (2) identify variations in distal humeral morphology that affected computer-assisted implant alignment. This was achieved by implanting both an unmodified humeral component and an implant with a reduced stem using computer assistance. We hypothesized that implantation of a humeral component with a reduced stem length would be more accurate than implantation of the standard length stem. In addition, we hypothesized that the variation in flexion-extension (FE) varus-valgus angulation would significantly affect computer-assisted implant alignment. Computer-assisted alignment of the implant articulating axis with the humeral FE axis was performed on 13 cadaveric humeri for both the regular and modified humeral component. Navigation was based on alignment of the prosthesis with a preoperative plan and registration of this plan to the humerus. Implant alignment was significantly improved for the reduced stem. Alignment error of the reduced stem averaged 1.3 ± 0.5 mm in translation and 1.2° ± 0.4° in rotation, compared with 1.9 ± 1.1 mm and 3.6° ± 2.1° for the regular stem. Humeral varus-valgus angulation significantly affected alignment of the unmodified stem. A humeral component with a fixed valgus angulation cannot be accurately positioned in a consistent fashion without sacrificing alignment of the FE axis. Improved accuracy of implant placement can be achieved by introducing a family of humeral components, with 3 valgus angulations of 0°, 4° and 8°.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 03/2011; 20(6):891-8. · 1.93 Impact Factor

Institutions

  • 2000–2013
    • The University of Western Ontario
      • • The Hand and Upper Limb Centre
      • • Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
      London, Ontario, Canada
  • 2003–2012
    • St. Joseph's Health Care London
      London, Ontario, Canada
  • 2007
    • University of Washington Seattle
      • Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
      Seattle, WA, USA
    • Saint Joseph Hospital
      Chicago, IL, USA
  • 2006
    • University of Guelph
      • School of Engineering
      Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    • Dalhousie University
      Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • 2004
    • St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto
      Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2000–2004
    • Lawson Health Research Institute
      London, Ontario, Canada