E Attar

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Are you E Attar?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)13.49 Total impact

  • Article: Double umbilical cord blood transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning and sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main limitations to umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation (UCBT) in adults are delayed engraftment, poor immunological reconstitution and high rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM). Double UCBT (DUCBT) has been used to circumvent the issue of low cell dose, but acute GVHD remains a significant problem. We describe our experience in 32 subjects, who underwent DUCBT after reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/melphalan/antithymocyte globulin and who received sirolimus and tacrolimus to prevent acute GVHD. Engraftment of neutrophils occurred in all patients at a median of 21 days, and platelet engraftment occurred at a median of 42 days. Three subjects had grade II-IV acute GVHD (9.4%) and chronic GVHD occurred in four subjects (cumulative incidence 12.5%). No deaths were caused by GVHD and NRM at 100 days was 12.5%. At 2 years, NRM, PFS and OS were 34.4, 31.2 and 53.1%, respectively. As expected, immunologic reconstitution was slow, but PFS and OS were associated with reconstitution of CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocyte subsets, suggesting that recovery of adaptive immunity is required for the prevention of infection and relapse after transplantation. In summary, sirolimus and tacrolimus provide excellent GVHD prophylaxis in DUCBT, and this regimen is associated with low NRM after DUCBT.
    Bone marrow transplantation 05/2011; 46(5):659-67. · 3.00 Impact Factor
  • Article: Autologous SCT with a dose-reduced BU and CY regimen in older patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Autologous SCT is a potentially curative procedure for patients with relapsed lymphoma (NHL). We analyzed the outcomes of 34 patients > or =60 years old, including eight patients > or =70 years old, who received BU and CY and SCT for NHL. Patients received BU 0.8 mg/kg i.v. (n=25) or 1 mg/kg p.o. (n=9) q 6 h x 14 doses and CY 60 mg/kg i.v. q day x 2 days. The median age was 66 (range, 60-78) years. Twenty-two patients had large cell, 10 follicular and two-mantle cell lymphoma. Fifteen patients were in a second or greater CR and 19 patients were in a PR. The median days to ANC >500/microl and platelet count >50,000/microl were 10 and 13 days respectively. The 100-day transplant-related mortality was 0%. Toxicities included interstitial lung disease (n=2), seizures in a patient with CNS lymphoma (n=1), mild veno-occlusive disease (n=2), and transient atrial fibrillation (n=4). With a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-year overall survival and PFS were 67 and 54% respectively. BU/CY is a well-tolerated conditioning regimen for older patients with NHL. Age alone should not be used as an exclusion criterion for autologous SCT.
    Bone marrow transplantation 10/2008; 43(1):37-42. · 3.00 Impact Factor
  • Article: Clinical outcomes of late rather than early full-donor chimerism in patients with advanced lymphomas receiving nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic SCT.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) can ideally provide long-term remission in advanced lymphoma patients by capturing a graft-vs-tumor (GVT) effect. On the basis of a murine model, we attempted to optimize a GVT effect through nonmyeloablative therapy and HLA-matched related donor HSCT with intentional induction of mixed chimerism followed by prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion. A total of 26 advanced lymphoma patients were separated into an early and late full-donor chimerism (FDC) group using a median of 45 days post-HSCT as the defining point for FDC. Upon generating these groups, analysis by Student's t-test demonstrated that they were statistically distinct in time to develop FDC (P<0.01). There was a trend toward improved CR rates in the late group relative to the early group (62 vs 31%; P=0.12). A trend toward improved progression-free survival at 5 years was also observed in the late compared to the early group by Kaplan-Meier analysis (38 vs 8%; P=0.081). However, this did not correlate to a significant overall survival benefit. In conclusion, these data support the observation from our mouse models that the most potent GVT effect occurs in mixed chimeras with late chimerism conversion.
    Bone Marrow Transplantation 06/2008; 42(5):329-35. · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • Article: Comparison of outcomes after transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow following an identical nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This is the first study to examine the outcomes in 54 patients with hematologic malignancies who received an HLA-matched related donor bone marrow (BM, n = 42) or GCSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC, n = 12) following identical nonmyeloablative conditioning with the intention of induction of mixed chimerism (MC) followed by prophylactic donor leukocyte infusion (pDLI) to convert MC to full donor chimerism (FDC) and capture a graft-versus-tumor effect without clinical graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Neutrophil and platelet recovery were faster and transfusion requirement was less in PBSC recipients (P < 0.05). A total of 48% of BMT recipients achieved FDC with a median conversion time of 84 days, including 13 following pDLI. In contrast, 83% (P = 0.04) in the PBSC group had spontaneous FDC at a median of 14 days, precluding the administration of pDLI. There was no significant difference in the incidences of acute or chronic GVHD, though the rates of chronic GVHD were considerably higher in PBSC group than in the BM group (6/7, 86% vs 10/24, 42%). CD4 and CD8 T-cell recovery was faster in PBSC recipients. In PBSC recipients, a higher number of CD34+ cells was associated with increased rates of severe, grade III-IV acute GVHD.
    Bone Marrow Transplantation 08/2007; 40(1):19-27. · 3.75 Impact Factor