-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is well established that human faces induce stronger involuntary orienting responses than other visual objects. Yet, the timing of this preferential orienting response at the neural level is still unknown. Here, we used an antisaccade paradigm to investigate the neural dynamics preceding the onset of reflexive and voluntary saccades elicited by human faces and nonface visual objects, normalized for their global low-level visual properties. High-density event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in observers as they performed interleaved pro- and antisaccades toward a lateralized target. For reflexive saccades, we report an ERP modulation specific to faces as early as 40-60 ms following stimulus onset over parieto-occipital sites, further predicting the speed of saccade execution. This was not linked to differences in the programming of the saccadic eye movements, as it occurred early in time. For the first time, we present electrophysiological evidence of early target selection to faces in reflexive orienting responses over parieto-occipital cortex that facilitates the triggering of saccades toward faces. We argue for a 2-stage process in the representation of a face in involuntary spatial orienting with an initial, rapid implicit processing of the visual properties of a face, followed by subsequent stimulus categorization depicted by the N170 component.
Cerebral Cortex 11/2012; · 6.54 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is widely accepted that the posterior parietal cortex is critical for the on-line control of action and optic ataxia patients are unable to correct their movements in-flight to changes in target position. The current study investigated on-line correction in patients with left visual neglect, right brain damaged patients without neglect and healthy controls. Participants were asked to reach towards a central target that could jump unexpectedly, at movement onset, to the right or left sides of space. In response to the jump, participants were asked either to follow the target or to stop their movement. Neglect patients were able to correct their ongoing movements smoothly and accurately towards right and left target jumps. They did so even when told to stop their movement, indicating that these corrections occurred automatically (i.e., without instruction). However, the timing of corrections to the left was delayed in neglect patients and this produced a drastic increase in movement time. To our surprise, we also found that neglect patients were impaired at stopping their ongoing reaches, when compared to the control groups, in response to either left or right jump trials. We suggest that the 'automatic pilot' system for the hand is spared in neglect, but its processing speed is unilaterally slowed due to a deficit in orienting of attention to the contralesional side. We relate these findings to the breakdown of a system that combines information for attention, perception and action. Damage to this system may not only slow corrective movements to the contralesional side, but also produce non-lateralized deficits in interrupting an ongoing reach.
Neuropsychologia 10/2011; 50(6):1124-35. · 3.64 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is well established that patients with hemispatial neglect present with severe visuospatial impairments, but studies that have investigated visuomotor control directly have revealed diverging results, with some investigations finding impairments mirroring the perceptual difficulties of these patients, while others have shown that such neglect patients perform relatively better in action tasks. In this review we attempt to reconcile these diverging findings, addressing differences in the type of visuomotor tasks studied but also highlighting the diverging neuroanatomy that seems to be driving the differences in performance. We argue that there are different types of actions and that these in turn depend on different cortical networks (Goodale, Westwood, & Milner, 2004; Milner & Goodale, 2006). Patients with visuospatial neglect, in contrast to patients with optic ataxia, are relatively unimpaired at performing target-directed tasks even towards stimuli located in their 'neglected' field. We relate these findings to the view that for the on-line guidance of action, spatial information is coded in egocentric coordinates and depends on the visuomotor networks of the visual dorsal stream. Furthermore, based on recent lesion-symptom mapping studies, we postulate that deficits in on-line actions that are observed after right-brain damage are associated with damage to the visuomotor control network, in particular with damage to the basal ganglia, frontal and parieto-occipital regions. On the other hand, clear neglect-specific deficits emerge when the action is off-line and not directly target-driven, thus requiring relational metrics or scene-based coordinates (as is the case for example in delayed and mirrored (anti-pointing) reaches). We review recent studies that support our argument that such deficits in off-line actions are associated with damage to occipito-temporal and parahippocampal cortex, perhaps as part of the ventral visual stream or areas where information from the two visual streams is combined.
Neuropsychologia 09/2011; 50(6):1018-28. · 3.64 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Recent evidence suggests the possibility that not all action modes depend on dorsal visual stream processing but that off-line nontarget-directed actions, such as antipointing, require additional and even distinct neural networks when compared with target-directed online actions. Here, we explored this potential dissociation in a group of 11 patients with left visual neglect, a syndrome characterized by a loss of awareness of the contralesional side of space. Ten healthy participants and 10 right hemisphere-damaged patients without neglect served as controls. Participants had to point either directly toward targets presented on their left or right (i.e., propointing) or to the mirror position in the opposite hemispace (i.e., antipointing). Compared with both control groups, neglect patients showed reduced accuracy when antipointing but not propointing. Lesion-behavior mapping revealed that the areas critically associated with these deficits were located in the middle and superior temporal and parahippocampal gyri. We argue that neglect patients present specific deficits only when the visuomotor task taps into more perceptual representations thought to rely on ventral visual stream processing and that our results indicate that right temporal brain regions are implicated in these off-line actions.
Cerebral Cortex 04/2011; 21(12):2751-61. · 6.54 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Human faces capture attention more than other visual stimuli. Here we investigated whether such face-specific biases rely on automatic (involuntary) or voluntary orienting responses. To this end, we used an anti-saccade paradigm, which requires the ability to inhibit a reflexive automatic response and to generate a voluntary saccade in the opposite direction of the stimulus. To control for potential low-level confounds in the eye-movement data, we manipulated the high-level visual properties of the stimuli while normalizing their global low-level visual properties. Eye movements were recorded in 21 participants who performed either pro- or anti-saccades to a face, car, or noise pattern, randomly presented to the left or right of a fixation point. For each trial, a symbolic cue instructed the observer to generate either a pro-saccade or an anti-saccade. We report a significant increase in anti-saccade error rates for faces compared to cars and noise patterns, as well as faster pro-saccades to faces and cars in comparison to noise patterns. These results indicate that human faces induce stronger involuntary orienting responses than other visual objects, i.e., responses that are beyond the control of the observer. Importantly, this involuntary processing cannot be accounted for by global low-level visual factors.
Journal of Vision 01/2010; 10(3):16.1-10. · 3.38 Impact Factor
-
Monika Harvey,
Keith Muir,
Ian Reeves,
George Duncan,
Philip Birschel,
Margaret Roberts,
Katrina Livingstone,
Hazel Jackson,
Caroline Hogg,
Pauline Castle,
Gemma Learmonth,
Stéphanie Rossit
Behavioural neurology 01/2010; 23(4):237-9. · 1.77 Impact Factor
-
Behavioural neurology 01/2010; 23(4):249-51. · 1.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: According to Milner and Goodale's model (The visual brain in action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006) areas in the ventral visual stream mediate visual perception and oV-line actions, whilst regions in the dorsal visual stream mediate the on-line visual control of action. Strong evidence for this model comes from a patient (DF), who suffers from visual form agnosia after bilateral damage to the ventro-lateral occipital region, sparing V1. It has been reported that she is normal in immediate reaching and grasping, yet severely impaired when asked to perform delayed actions. Here we investigated whether this dissociation would extend to saccade execution. Neurophysiological studies and TMS work in humans have shown that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), on the right in particular (supposedly spared in DF), is involved in the control of memory-guided saccades. Surprisingly though, we found that, just as reported for reaching and grasping, DF's saccadic accuracy was much reduced in the memory compared to the stimulus-guided condition. These data support the idea of a tight coupling of eye and hand movements and further suggest that dorsal stream structures may not be sufficient to drive memory-guided saccadic performance.
Experimental Brain Research 11/2009; 200(1):109-16. · 2.39 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We tested patients suffering from hemispatial neglect on the anti-saccade paradigm to assess voluntary control of saccades. In this task participants are required to saccade away from an abrupt onset target. As has been previously reported, in the pro-saccade condition neglect patients showed increased latencies towards targets presented on the left and their accuracy was reduced as a result of greater undershoot. To our surprise though, in the anti-saccade condition, we found strong bilateral effects: the neglect patients produced large numbers of erroneous pro-saccades to both left and right stimuli. This deficit in voluntary control was present even in patients whose lesions spared the frontal lobes. These results suggest that the voluntary control of action is supported by an integrated network of cortical regions, including more posterior areas. Damage to one or more components within this network may result in impaired voluntary control.
Neuropsychologia 06/2009; 47(12):2488-95. · 3.64 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We have recently reported that patients with hemispatial neglect demonstrate increased terminal errors when performing delayed leftward reaches and that right-brain damaged patients (irrespective of neglect) take longer to complete their movements [Rossit, S., Muir, K., Reeves, I., Duncan, G., Birschel, P., & Harvey, M. (2009). Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologiaa 47, 1563-1573]. Here we conducted an initial voxel-based lesion-symptom analysis to examine the neural basis of such deficits in 21 right-brain damaged subjects with 11 patients suffering from hemispatial neglect (2 more than in Rossit et al. [Rossit S., Muir K., Reeves I., Duncan, G., Birschel, P., & Harvey, M. (2009). Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 47, 1563-1573] and 10 control patients without the condition. We found that the accuracy impairments in delayed leftward reaches were associated with damage to occipito-temporal areas. In contrast, the movement time slowing was related to more anterior lesions in the frontal lobe. These findings agree with the view that neglect affects actions thought to depend on the processing carried out by the ventral visual stream. In addition, we suggest that the timing impairments which are not neglect-specific maybe be driven by frontal structures.
Neuropsychologia 05/2009; 47(10):2149-53. · 3.64 Impact Factor
-
Stéphanie Rossit,
Paresh Malhotra,
Keith Muir,
Ian Reeves,
George Duncan,
Katrina Livingstone,
Hazel Jackson,
Caroline Hogg,
Pauline Castle,
Gemma Learmonth, Monika Harvey
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is well established that patients with hemispatial neglect present with severe visuospatial impairments, but studies that have directly investigated visuomotor control have revealed diverging results, with some studies showing that neglect patients perform relatively better on such tasks. The present study compared the visuomotor performance of patients with and without neglect after right-hemisphere stroke with those of age-matched controls. Participants were asked to point either directly towards targets or halfway between two stimuli, both with and without visual feedback during movement. Although we did not find any neglect-specific impairment, both patient groups showed increased reaction times to leftward stimuli as well as decreased accuracies for open loop leftward reaches. We argue that these findings agree with the view that neglect patients code spatial parameters for action veridically. Moreover, we suggest that lesions in the right hemisphere may cause motor deficits irrespective of the presence of neglect and we performed an initial voxel-lesion symptom analysis to assess this. Lesion-symptom analysis revealed that the reported deficits did not result from damage to neglect-associated areas alone, but were further associated with lesions to crucial nodes in the visuomotor control network (the basal ganglia as well as occipito-parietal and frontal areas).
Cerebral Cortex 04/2009; 19(11):2616-24. · 6.54 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Effective interaction with the world requires the brain to signal behaviourally relevant events and organise an appropriate and timely motor response to such events. Unilateral brain lesion typically results in a reduction and slowing of motor behaviour directed to contralesional space. Accumulator models of choice and reaction time can distinguish between two possible functional causes of this deficit: slowed extraction of evidence in favour of a motor response or an increase in the required amount of evidence for response generation. Three patients with unilateral damage to the right hemisphere were tested on a visually guided saccade task. All three patients showed a dramatic increase in the latency of their responses to targets in the contralesional visual field. We fit their saccade latency distributions with a number of competing accumulator models that embody the alternative functional causes of this deficit. The latency difference between the two hemifields was best accounted for as an increase in the amount of evidence required for a contralesional response.
Neuroscience Letters 04/2009; 452(1):1-4. · 2.11 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Experiments using chimeric faces, where the left and the right hand side of the face are different, have shown that observers tend to bias their responses toward the information on the left. Here we investigate the effects of aging as well as exposure duration on this leftward bias. Forty female and male blended as well as chimeric faces were presented to 24 young and 23 elderly adults in either sub-saccadic 100 msec, 300 msec or free view conditions. We found firstly that an increase in exposure duration resulted in an increase in the degree of leftward perceptual biases, irrespective of age, in line with hypotheses stressing the contribution of scanning to chimeric face processing. Secondly, fundamental differences in the perceptual biases between the groups were found in so far that the younger subjects demonstrated significant perceptual biases to chimeric face stimuli even at sub-saccadic exposure durations, whilst for older adults this was the case for the 300 msec and free view conditions only. This differential perceptual activity can be viewed in terms of either reduced right hemispheric function, or increased bilateral function as a possible consequence of elderly adults experiencing the task as more effortful.
Cortex 07/2008; 44(6):665-72. · 6.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It has been widely reported that aging is accompanied by a decline in motor skill performance and in particular, it has been shown that older subjects take longer to adapt their ongoing reach in response to a target location shift. In the present experiment, we investigated the influence of aging on the ability to perform trajectory corrections in response to a target jump, but also assessed inhibition by asking a younger and an older group of participants to either adapt or stop their ongoing movement in response to a target location change. Results showed that although older subjects took longer to initiate, execute, correct and inhibit an ongoing reach, they performed both tasks with the same level of accuracy as the younger sample. Moreover, the slowing was also observed when older subjects were asked to point to stationary targets. Our findings thus indicate that aging does not specifically influence the ability to perform or inhibit fast online corrections to target location changes, but rather produces a general slowing and increased variability of movement planning, initiation and execution to both perturbed and stationary targets. For the first time, we demonstrate that aging is not accompanied by a decrease in the inhibition of motor control.
Experimental Brain Research 03/2008; 185(1):1-10. · 2.39 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We investigated hemispheric differences in image-specific and abstractive immediate repetition priming of famous faces. Participants performed speeded familiarity decisions for centrally presented famous and unfamiliar target faces. Target faces were preceded by lateralized primes (150 ms), presented either in the left or right visual field (LVF or RVF). Primes were either an identical photograph of the famous target face (image-specific priming), a different image of the famous target face (abstractive priming) or a different familiar face (unprimed condition). Reaction times (RTs) revealed significant effects of priming for both image-specific and abstractive priming overall. In addition, image-specific priming was more than twice the magnitude for targets following LVF primes as compared to RVF primes. By contrast, no hemispheric differences emerged for abstractive face priming across different images. Whereas ERPs revealed no evidence that priming affected the N170 component, both image-specific and abstractive priming significantly modulated the amplitudes of a right temporal N250r and a parietal N400 component. Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in image-specific and abstractive face priming are discussed with respect to current theories of how the human left and right ventral temporal cortices represent abstractive and form-specific visual information.
Neuropsychologia 11/2007; 45(13):2910-21. · 3.64 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Spatially lateralised deficits that typically define the hemispatial neglect syndrome have been shown to co-occur with other non-lateralised deficits of attention, memory, and drawing. However even a simple graphic task involves multiple planning components, including the specification of drawing start position and drawing direction. In order to investigate the influence of these factors in neglect we presented patients with a circle-copying task, and specified the drawing start point. The ability to draw from the instructed location was strongly related to tests that measure constructional abilities, but not related to start point laterality. In contrast, the direction in which patients drew the circle was affected by start point laterality: patients with neglect were less likely to draw in a typical direction when the cue was on the affected side of space and this was strongly related to severity of the neglect. Patients with neglect consistently produced circles that were smaller than the model; however, the scaling was not affected by the laterality of the start point, nor was the proportion of drawings correctly started at the cue. These findings demonstrate the complex relationship between neglect and even the simplest test for the syndrome.
Brain and Cognition 07/2007; 64(2):150-7. · 3.17 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Patients with hemispatial neglect show deficits in size perception. We investigated how this effect would be modulated by a change in object orientation. Seven right-hemisphere-lesioned patients, with and without neglect, and a control group, were asked to indicate which one of two bilaterally presented lines was longer, shorter or the same. Depending on the participant's response, the length was increased or decreased in a staircase-like procedure. Line orientation was varied over separate blocks. All neglect patients judged a line on the left as shorter, predominantly for horizontal lines and lines rotated by 30 degrees. Moreover, the magnitude of the distortion effect varied considerably between patients from as little as 2% objective underestimation to as much as 20%.
Neuroreport 04/2007; 18(5):457-60. · 1.66 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Experiments using chimeric faces typically report a perceptual bias towards the viewers left. Here we show that this leftward bias can be elicited even when eye movement should be impossible. Although supporting previous studies arguing that eye movements are not necessary to generate the bias, the effect we found here was significantly reduced, compared to an earlier study which allowed eye movements. We suggest that the chimeric face bias is enhanced by eye movements.
Brain Research 01/2007; 1124(1):96-9. · 2.73 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In search tasks, patients with spatial neglect typically fail to respond to stimuli on the contralesional side. Such behavior has been associated with hyperattention to the ipsilesional side and a deficit in disengaging from attended stimuli. The present study investigated whether such explanations can also account for a further kind of behavior frequently shown by neglect patients: repetitive returns to previously indicated stimuli, particularly on the ipsilesional side. A group of neglect patients was tested along with a group of healthy participants and a patient control group without neglect. Participants performed an exploration task in which they searched for targets defined by their shape or for all stimuli either with the aid of vision or blindfolded. The results showed differential effects of reducing the salience of visual stimuli by blindfolding. For a subgroup of patients, detection rate improved, while for others the percentage of omissions increased. However, contrary to the control groups, blindfolding had no effect on repetitive search in the neglect group, inconsistent with hyperattention, a disengage or impaired working memory deficits. The rate of repetitive returns to previously indicated locations did not seem to be associated with the percentage of omitted stimuli, suggesting that repetitive returns may be best explained by a disruption of systematic search and lack of volitional control in spatial neglect. The results further underline the importance of considering repetitive search behavior in addition to omissions in standard neglect assessments.
Brain Research 12/2006; 1118(1):106-15. · 2.73 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Goal-driven control over saccade target selection requires the inhibition of task-irrelevant, stimulus-driven saccades. A widely held assumption is that frontal structures are of critical importance for this function. Here we report the oculomotor capture behaviour of a patient with a right temporo-parietal lesion, which challenges this view. T.H. was asked to search for a target among distractors and to signal its location with a saccade. A task-irrelevant, additional distractor appeared with or without abrupt onset, and it was either similar or dissimilar in its colour to the target. Compared to controls, T.H. showed an elevated level of capture overall. He also showed spatial extinction, which was partially overridden by an abrupt onset distractor. These results support the view that effective oculomotor control depends on an intact network of frontal and posterior brain regions. We argue that stimulus-driven and goal-driven signals are computed at different stages, but are ultimately combined in a common functional salience map.
Cognitive Neuropsychology 09/2006; 23(6):990-9. · 2.13 Impact Factor
