-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bone metastases are a significant and undertreated clinical problem in patients with advanced lung cancer.
We reviewed the incidence of bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with lung cancer and examined the burden on patients' lives and on health care systems. Available therapies to improve survival and lessen the impact of SREs on quality of life (QoL) were also investigated.
Bone metastases are common in lung cancer; however, owing to short survival times, data on the incidences of SREs are limited. As with other cancers, the costs associated with treating SREs in lung cancer are substantial. Bisphosphonates reduce the frequency of SREs and improve measures of pain and QoL in patients with lung cancer; however, nephrotoxicity is a common complication of therapy. Denosumab, a recently approved bone-targeted therapy, is superior to zoledronic acid in increasing the time to first on-study SRE in patients with solid tumours, including lung cancer. Additional roles of bone-targeted therapies beyond the prevention of SREs are under investigation.
With increasing awareness of the consequences of SREs, bone-targeted therapies may play a greater role in the management of patients with lung cancer, with the aim of delaying disease progression and preserving QoL.
Annals of Oncology 02/2012; 23(9):2215-22. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: 23Na-MRI has been proposed as a potential imaging biomarker for the assessment of tumor viability and the evaluation of therapy response but has not yet been evaluated in patients with lung cancer. We aimed to assess the feasibility of 23Na-MRI in patients with lung cancer.
Three patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung were examined on a clinical 3 Tesla MRI system (Magnetom TimTrio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Feasibility of 23Na-MRI images was proven by comparison and fusion of 23Na-MRI with 1H-MR, CT and FDG-PET-CT images. 23Na signal intensities (SI) of tumor and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of the spinal canal were measured and the SI ratio in tumor and CSF was calculated. One chemonaive patient was examined before and after the initiation of combination therapy (Carboplatin, Gemcitabin, Cetuximab).
All 23Na-MRI examinations were successfully completed and were of diagnostic quality. Fusion of 23Na-MRI images with 1H-MRI, CT and FDG-PET-CT was feasible in all patients and showed differences in solid and necrotic tumor areas. The mean tumor SI and the tumor/CSF SI ratio were 13.3 ± 1.8 × 103 and 0.83 ± 0.14, respectively. In necrotic tumors, as suggested by central non-FDG-avid areas, the mean tumor SI and the tumor/CSF ratio were 19.4 × 103 and 1.10, respectively.
23Na-MRI is feasible in patients with lung cancer and could provide valuable functional molecular information regarding tumor viability, and potentially treatment response.
RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der R 02/2012; 184(4):340-4. · 2.76 Impact Factor
-
C Manegold,
N van Zandwijk,
A Szczesna,
P Zatloukal,
J S K Au,
M Blasinska-Morawiec,
P Serwatowski,
M Krzakowski,
J Jassem,
E H Tan,
R J Benner,
A Ingrosso,
S J Meech,
D Readett,
N Thatcher
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This open-label phase III study assessed the addition of Toll-like receptor 9-activating oligodeoxynucleotide PF-3512676 to gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized (1:1) to receive six or fewer 3-week cycles of i.v. gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin alone (75 mg/m2 on day 1, control arm) or combined with s.c. PF-3512676 0.2 mg/kg on days 8 and 15 of each chemotherapy cycle and weekly thereafter until progression or unacceptable toxicity (experimental arm). No crossover was planned. The primary end point was overall survival (OS).
A total of 839 patients were randomized. Baseline demographics were well balanced. Median OS (11.0 versus 10.7 months; P=0.98) and median progression-free survival (PFS) (both 5.1 months) were similar between groups. Grade≥3 hematologic adverse events (AEs), injection-site reactions, and influenza-like symptoms were more frequently reported among patients receiving PF-3512676. At the first-interim analysis, the Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended study discontinuation. Administration of PF-3512676 was halted based on efficacy futility and increased grade≥3 AEs (experimental arm).
Addition of PF-3512676 to gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy did not improve OS or PFS but did increase toxicity.
Annals of Oncology 04/2011; 23(1):72-7. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
M Reck,
J von Pawel,
P Zatloukal,
R Ramlau,
V Gorbounova,
V Hirsh,
N Leighl,
J Mezger,
V Archer,
N Moore, C Manegold
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bevacizumab, the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent, provides clinical benefit when combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We report the final overall survival (OS) analysis from the phase III AVAiL trial.
Patients (n = 1043) received cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) for up to six cycles plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg (n = 345), bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (n = 351) or placebo (n = 347) every 3 weeks until progression. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); OS was a secondary end point.
Significant PFS prolongation with bevacizumab compared with placebo was maintained with longer follow-up {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.75 (0.64-0.87), P = 0.0003 and 0.85 (0.73-1.00), P = 0.0456} for the 7.5 and 15 mg/kg groups, respectively. Median OS was >13 months in all treatment groups; nevertheless, OS was not significantly increased with bevacizumab [HR (95% CI) 0.93 (0.78-1.11), P = 0.420 and 1.03 (0.86-1.23), P = 0.761] for the 7.5 and 15 mg/kg groups, respectively, versus placebo. Most patients ( approximately 62%) received multiple lines of poststudy treatment. Updated safety results are consistent with those previously reported.
Final analysis of AVAiL confirms the efficacy of bevacizumab when combined with cisplatin-gemcitabine. The PFS benefit did not translate into a significant OS benefit, possibly due to high use of efficacious second-line therapies.
Annals of Oncology 02/2010; 21(9):1804-9. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Baseline patient and disease characteristics are investigated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an effort to predict response to treatment and optimize patients' outcomes. Histology has recently been identified in multiple NSCLC phase III trials as a predictive factor for survival in patients receiving pemetrexed regimens.
Cox-adjusted models were used to further analyze a randomized phase III study in 1725 chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of zero or one who received cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP; C, 75 mg/m(2) and P, 500 mg/m(2)) or cisplatin plus gemcitabine (CG; C, 75 mg/m(2) and G, 1250 mg/m(2)) every 21 days.
Histology was confirmed to be predictive of CP efficacy and may also be prognostic. Gender, ethnicity, disease stage, smoking status, and PS were not predictive in either treatment arm but were shown to be prognostic in the nonsquamous population, consistent with the results in the overall NSCLC population.
NSCLC histology significantly predicts efficacy outcomes for patients receiving pemetrexed. Several other factors are prognostic for the overall study population as well as a subset of patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.
Annals of Oncology 10/2009; 21(3):556-61. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
Ejc Supplements - EJC SUPPL. 01/2009; 7(2):522-522.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) has rarely been studied. The Expanded Access Program (EAP) provided access to 109 patients with PM.
This was a nonrandomized, open-label study conducted in chemo-naïve or previously treated patients with PM not amenable to curative surgery. Patients received pemetrexed (PEM) 500 mg/m2 alone or with cisplatin (CIS) 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (CARBO) AUC 5 every 21 days, supplemented with standard vitamin B(12), folate, and dexamethasone.
Response rates (95% CI) for PEM, PEM/CIS, and PEM/CARBO were 12.5% (3.5, 29.0), 20.0% (7.7, 38.6), and 24.1% (10.3, 43.5), respectively. Median survival for PEM was 10.3 months. One-year survival rates for PEM/CIS and PEM were 57.4% (95% CI: 10.3, 100) and 41.5% (95% CI: 4.6, 78.4), respectively, and were not available for PEM/CARBO. Anemia was the most common serious adverse event (6.4%). Neutropenia (34.6%) was the most frequent CTC grade 3 or 4 toxicity reported. CONCLUDING STATEMENT: PEM with or without a platinum agent was both active and well tolerated in patients with peritoneal mesothelioma.
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 12/2008; 64(2):211-8. · 3.14 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The present EORTC phase II feasibility study in stage IIIB (T4-N3) NSCLC was conducted to investigate whether an induction regimen with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery after restaging by re-mediastinoscopy and/or fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was feasible in a multicenter setting. Unfortunately, the study closed prematurely because of poor accrual. The combination of more stringent selection criteria, the incorrect prevailing view of Ethical Boards that a tri-modality approach is too toxic, competing studies in the participating centers and the fact that patients with N3 disease could only be enrolled if a re-mediastinoscopy could be performed, underlie the low accrual. Although this study illustrates that the conduct of a tri-modality study across Europe appeared to be difficult at that time, the number of centers with highly qualified and experienced specialists involved in this kind of multi-modality approaches is rapidly increasing. Future initiatives should, therefore, certainly be encouraged. Minimally invasive procedures such as EUS and EBUS should preferably be used for up-front mediastinal staging, mediastinoscopy with or without EUS should preferably be reserved for restaging, and especially right-sided pneumonectomies should be avoided. Though evident, the feasibility to complete this kind of studies within a reasonable time period is still a condition sine qua non.
Lung Cancer 02/2007; 55(1):95-9. · 3.43 Impact Factor
-
F Efficace,
A Bottomley,
E F Smit,
P Lianes,
C Legrand,
C Debruyne,
F Schramel,
H J Smit,
R Gaafar,
B Biesma, C Manegold,
C Coens,
G Giaccone,
J Van Meerbeeck
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this prognostic factor analysis was to investigate if a patient's self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) provided independent prognostic information for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Pretreatment HRQOL was measured in 391 advanced NSCLC patients using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC Lung Cancer module (QLQ-LC13). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of survival. In addition, a bootstrap validation technique was used to assess the stability of the outcomes.
The final multivariate Cox regression model retained four parameters as independent prognostic factors for survival: male gender with a hazard ratio (HR) = 1.32 (95% CI 1.03-1.69; P = 0.03); performance status (0 to 1 versus 2) with HR = 1.63 (95% CI 1.04-2.54; P = 0.032); patient's self-reported score of pain with HR= 1.11 (95% CI 1.07-1.16; P < 0.001) and dysphagia with HR = 1.12 (95% CI 1.04-1.21; P = 0.003). A 10-point shift worse in the scale measuring pain and dysphagia translated into an 11% and 12% increased in the likelihood of death respectively. A risk group categorization was also developed.
The results suggest that patients' self-reported HRQOL provide independent prognostic information for survival. This finding supports the collection of such data in routine clinical practice.
Annals of Oncology 11/2006; 17(11):1698-704. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This is a dose-finding study of fixed dose gemcitabine and escalating doses of ifosfamide, in chemo naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The purpose of the study was to determine the optimal dosage and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of a specified schedule of gemcitabine and ifosfamide. Patients received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 and ifosfamide between 1.6 and 2.2 g/m2, intravenously, on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of four cycles. RESULTS: Sixteen patients entered the study. Three patients were entered at the first dose level of ifosfamide (1.6 g/m2) and none experienced any dose limiting (DLT) toxicity. In dose level 2 (1.8 g/m2), two patients had grade IV haematological toxicities, but they reached 21 days without any other dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Three further patients entered at this level but they were withdrawn due to disease progression. The sixth patient entered without any DLT. Three patients entered dose level 3 (2.0 g/m2), without any grade IV toxicity. The first patient entered into dose level 4 (2.2 g/m2), had progressive disease within 21 days and was withdrawn and another three were entered and had no DLT during the first 21 days. Four (33%) of the patients had stable disease and 67% had progressive disease. CONCLUSION: The MTD of the ifosfamide gemcitabine combination was not reached in the present study, as no DLT was observed. This combination at the dose levels of this protocol has little or no activity in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Lung Cancer 09/2006; 53(2):165-70. · 3.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this phase II study was to document activity and toxicity of docetaxel and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before definitive local treatment. Forty-six chemotherapy-nai ve patients (median age 60 years) were included. Treatment consisted of 3 cycles of docetaxel (85 mg/m2 on day 1), followed by cisplatin (40 mg/m2/day on days 1 and 2) every 21 days. Grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia occurred in 45.7% and 65.2% of the patients, respectively. Among 8 cases of febrile neutropenia (17.4%), one (2.2%) resulted in early death. Common grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities were nausea (17.4%) and vomiting (13%). Eighty-five percent of the patients received three courses; six stopped prematurely due to toxicity, one due to protocol violation. Response rate was the primary endpoint of this study. Considering eligible patients (n=40), 18 responses (1 complete and 17 partial responses) were observed (response rate 45%; 95% Confidence interval (CI): 29.3%-61.5%). In stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients, docetaxel-cisplatin could be administered and demonstrated manageable toxicity with modest efficacy.
European Journal of Cancer 08/2006; 42(10):1399-406. · 5.54 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This trial aimed to assess the feasibility and tumour control of concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone after docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC received two 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel (85 mg m(-2), day 1) plus cisplatin (40 mg m(-2), days 1 and 2). Patients without disease progression on day 43 were randomised to radiotherapy (2 Gy for 5 days week(-1); total 60 Gy) alone or with docetaxel 20 mg m(-2) once weekly every 6 weeks. Of 108 patients who received induction chemotherapy, 104 were evaluable for response. After induction chemotherapy, the overall response rate (ORR) was 44%; 91 (88%) patients had no disease progression and 89 were subsequently randomised to local treatment. After randomised therapy, the ORR was 53% (chemoradiotherapy 58%; radiotherapy 48%). Median survival and time to progression were 14.9 and 7.8 months, respectively, for chemoradiotherapy and 14.0 and 7.5 months, respectively, for radiotherapy. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy and randomised therapy were grades 3-4 neutropenia and grade 3 lymphocytopenia, respectively. Docetaxel-cisplatin induction therapy followed by concurrent docetaxel and thoracic radiotherapy is a feasible treatment option, showing good clinical activity and tolerability, for locally advanced NSCLC.
British Journal of Cancer 06/2006; 94(10):1375-82. · 5.04 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Häufigkeit: Das diffuse maligne Pleuramesotheliom ist der häufigste primäre Pleuratumor, gehört aber zu den selteneren Tumorerkrankungen.
Es findet sich häufiger bei Männern als bei Frauen (Connelly et al. 1987). Mit einer Zunahme dieser Erkrankung bis etwa zum
Jahre 2020 ist zu rechnen (gleichbleibende Tendenz bei Frauen; steigende Tendenz bei Männern) (Peto et al. 1995).
12/2005: pages 3641-3657;
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Controversial results of surgical treatment after induction chemotherapy, especially in relation to the extent of resection, have previously been reported. Mortality and morbidity were studied in the surgical arm of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 08941 trial. EORTC 08941 is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, phase-III trial of surgical resection versus radiotherapy in patients with proven stage IIIA-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after an objective response to platinum-based induction chemotherapy. Operative results in the 167 patients randomised in the surgical arm are presented within this study. Among these patients, one switched to the radiotherapy arm and 17 patients did not get any protocol treatment or information is not yet available. Radical resection with negative surgical margins was obtained in 74 patients (49.7%). In 61 patients (40.9%), a pathological down-staging to N0 or N1 was present. Operative 30-day mortality was 4.0%. Post-operative complications were mainly pneumonia, respiratory insufficiency, arrhythmias, air leak, cardiac decompensation, empyema and bronchopleural fistula. In total, 12 (8.1%) patients underwent re-operation due to positive margins, haemothorax, empyema and bronchopleural fistula. In conclusion, surgical resection after induction chemotherapy in the multicentre European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial has yielded acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.
European Respiratory Journal 09/2005; 26(2):192-7. · 5.89 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A phase III trial in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma demonstrated a survival advantage for pemetrexed plus cisplatin compared with single-agent cisplatin. Because post-study chemotherapy (PSC) may have influenced the outcome of the trial, we examined its use and association with survival.
Eighty-four patients from the pemetrexed plus cisplatin arm and 105 patients from the single-agent cisplatin arm received PSC. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were compared by treatment groups, and by PSC and non-PSC subgroups.
The percentage of patients receiving PSC was imbalanced between the treatment arms. Fewer pemetrexed plus cisplatin treated patients received PSC (37.2% versus 47.3%). A multiple regression analysis performed in this trial showed that PSC had a statistically significant correlation with prolonged survival (P <0.01), adjusting for baseline prognostic factors and treatment intervention. The adjusted hazard ratio for PSC over non-PSC subgroups was 0.56 (confidence interval 0.44-0.72).
PSC in malignant pleural mesothelioma was significantly associated with prolonged survival. It is not known whether the reduced risk of death was associated with PSC or whether patients who had prolonged survival tended to receive more PSC. The pemetrexed plus cisplatin treatment group had a statistically significant survival advantage even though fewer patients from that arm of the trial received PSC. The potentially beneficial role of PSC should be assessed in prospective trials.
Annals of Oncology 07/2005; 16(6):923-7. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
Annals of Oncology 02/2005; 16 Suppl 1:i32-3. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
T Le Chevalier,
G Scagliotti,
R Natale,
S Danson,
R Rosell,
R Stahel,
P Thomas,
R M Rudd,
J Vansteenkiste,
N Thatcher, C Manegold,
J-L Pujol,
N van Zandwijk,
C Gridelli,
J P van Meerbeeck,
L Crino,
A Brown,
P Fitzgerald,
M Aristides,
J H Schiller
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gemcitabine-platinum combination activity has been clearly established in a number of phase II studies. It has also been compared against other combinations in many phase III trials. It is generally believed that all such regimens have an equivalent impact on survival. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the treatment effect of gemcitabine plus a platinum agent in the treatment of advanced NSCLC and compare the combination to other regimens used globally.
Data from a total of 4556 patients from 13 randomized trials investigating gemcitabine in combination with a platinum agent versus any other platinum-containing regimen were included in a meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.
A significant reduction in overall mortality in favor of gemcitabine-platinum regimens was observed, hazard ratio (HR) 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96) with an absolute benefit at 1 year of 3.9%. Median survival was 9.0 months for the gemcitabine-platinum regimens and 8.2 months for the comparator regimens. Sub-group analysis of the first- and second-generation platinum-based comparator regimens also indicated a significant benefit for gemcitabine-platinum regimens, HR 0.84 (CI: 0.71-0.9985). Analysis of third-generation agent plus platinum regimens showed a non-significant trend favoring gemcitabine-platinum regimens, HR 0.93 (CI: 0.86-1.01). There was a significant decrease in the risk of disease progression in favor of gemcitabine-platinum regimens, HR 0.88 (CI: 0.82-0.93). An absolute benefit of 4.2% at 1 year was estimated. Median progression-free survival was 5.1 months for gemcitabine-platinum regimens compared with 4.4 months for the comparator regimens. Sub-group analysis indicated a statistically significant progression-free survival benefit for patients assigned to gemcitabine-platinum treatment compared to first- and second-generation platinum regimens, HR 0.85 (CI: 0.77-0.94), and third-generation agent plus platinum regimens, HR 0.89 (CI: 0.82-0.96).
Lung Cancer 02/2005; 47(1):69-80. · 3.43 Impact Factor
-
C Gridelli, C Manegold,
P Mali,
M Reck,
L Portalone,
O Castelnau,
R Stahel,
D Betticher,
M Pless,
J Terrassa Pons,
D Aubert,
J-P Burillon,
Y Parlier,
F De Marinis
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Vinorelbine intravenously (i.v.) demonstrated its efficacy and tolerability in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, including elderly subjects. Since vinorelbine is now available as an oral formulation this phase II open study was designed to evaluate its activity and tolerability in advanced, elderly NSCLC patients. A total of 56 chemonaive patients were recruited from April 2001 through to March 2002. The dosage schedule, already tested in younger NSCLC patients, was 60 mg/m(2)once a week for three weeks (first cycle), followed by 80 mg/m(2) once a week until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. A limited sampling scheme was used for performing pharmacokinetic analysis on 52 of 56 patients enrolled in the study. Treatment was well tolerated with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 11/17 patients (20/30%) and febrile neutropenia in 1 (2%). Six partial responses (11%) and 25 stable disease responses were recorded, with a disease control rate of 55%. Median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI) [6.2-11.3]). The clinical benefit response rate was 31% on 32 evaluable patients. Pharmacokinetic profiles appeared quite similar to the historical profiles recorded following i.v. administration. Oral vinorelbine appears to be a reasonable alternative to i.v. vinorelbine, both in terms of activity and tolerability, in advanced, elderly NSCLC patients.
European Journal of Cancer 12/2004; 40(16):2424-31. · 5.54 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is currently recommended as the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its benefit seems limited to fit patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. For PS2 patients, there is no consensus on standard treatment. With the aims of reviewing the evidence supporting each of these therapeutic options, possibly reaching a consensus for treatment of PS2 patients affected by advanced NSCLC in clinical practice, and suggesting the priorities for clinical research in this field, an European Experts Panel took place in Avellino, Italy in April 2003. RESULTS: and conclusions On the basis of current evidence, chemotherapy treatment appears justified for patients with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Single-agent chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxanes) could be the preferred option, although carboplatin-based or low-dose cisplatin-based doublets may represent alternative options. Stronger evidence is expected from new clinical research specifically focused on PS2 patients. Single-agent chemotherapy should be the standard arm against which experimental treatments are tested in randomised trials dedicated to PS2 patients. High priority should be given to the evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of platinum-based combinations, and to the testing of new biological agents. Another research priority is the improvement of supportive care. Patients strongly need symptomatic improvement: end points such as symptom relief, clinical benefit and quality of life should have a central position in trials dedicated to PS2 NSCLC patients.
Annals of Oncology 04/2004; 15(3):419-26. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
W E Eberhardt,
K S Albain,
H Pass,
J B Putnam,
A Gregor,
H Assamura,
F Mornex,
S Senan,
J Belderbos,
V Westeel,
M Thomas,
P Van Schil,
J Vansteenkiste, C Manegold,
R O Mirimanoff,
M Stuschke,
J Pignon,
P Rocmans,
F A Shepherd
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Surgery alone is currently still accepted "standard of care" for patients with operable NSCLC, this includes stages IA and IIB, as well as selected early subsets of IIIA disease. In more advanced and inoperable stage III disease, combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy remain the standard treatment approach for patients with good performance status. The role of surgery following induction therapy in these advanced stage III patients is at the moment not conclusively defined. More evidence from randomized trials is clearly needed to tailor treatment for the large number of patients that present in these locally advanced stages. Enrollment of patients into ongoing prospective clinical trials should be encouraged, whenever possible, to further define prognostic factors and improve multimodality strategies in this clinical setting.
Lung Cancer 01/2004; 42 Suppl 1:S9-14. · 3.43 Impact Factor
