-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Tuberculosis (TB) is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Even after successful microbiological cure of TB, many patients are left with residual pulmonary damage that can lead to chronic respiratory impairment and greater risk of additional TB episodes due to reinfection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Elevated levels of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α and several other markers of inflammation, together with expression of matrix metalloproteinases, have been associated with increased risk of pulmonary fibrosis, tissue damage, and poor treatment outcomes in TB patients. In this study, we used a rabbit model of pulmonary TB to evaluate the impact of adjunctive immune modulation, using a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor that dampens the innate immune response, on the outcome of treatment with the antibiotic isoniazid. Our data show that cotreatment of M. tuberculosis infected rabbits with the phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor CC-3052 plus isoniazid significantly reduced the extent of immune pathogenesis, compared with antibiotic alone, as determined by histologic analysis of infected tissues and the expression of genes involved in inflammation, fibrosis, and wound healing in the lungs. Combined treatment with an antibiotic and CC-3052 not only lessened disease but also improved bacterial clearance from the lungs. These findings support the potential for adjunctive immune modulation to improve the treatment of pulmonary TB and reduce the risk of chronic respiratory impairment.
American Journal Of Pathology 07/2011; 179(1):289-301. · 4.89 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), treatment with lenalidomide induces a unique, previously uncharacterized, immune response called tumor flare reaction (TFR). The clinical significance of this reaction remains unknown.
Forty-five patients with CLL who were treated with lenalidomide in a phase 2 clinical trial were evaluated for the clinical features, intensity, and duration of TFR. Correlation was made with tumor response and the immune cellular microenvironment. Steroids for the prophylaxis of TFR was not given to patients in Group A (n = 29) whereas patients in Group B (n = 16) received low-dose prednisone as well as a slow dose escalation of lenalidomide for the prevention of TFR.
Thirty (67%) patients experienced a TFR, with a grade 2 or 3 reaction (according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]) observed in 33% of patients (47% in Group A and 9% in Group B; P = .05). The median time to onset of the TFR was 6 days, and was longer in the patients receiving prophylaxis (4 days vs 9 days, respectively; P = .01). A complete response was observed in 7 of 30 (23%) patients with TFR and 1 of 15 (7%) patients without TFR. The median progression-free survival was 19.9 months and 19.4 months, respectively, for patients with versus those without TFR (P = .92).
TFR is a unique immune-mediated phenomenon noted with lenalidomide treatment only in patients with CLL that correlates with clinical response. It can be effectively managed with anti-inflammatory agents.
Cancer 05/2011; 117(10):2127-35. · 4.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lenalidomide (REVLIMID), an immunomodulatory compound targeting both cancer cells and their microenvironment, has substantial activity in several difficult-to-manage hematological malignancies. In previously treated multiple myeloma, lenalidomide produces high-quality responses combined with sustained disease control. Recently, several randomized studies have demonstrated a clinical benefit of continuous lenalidomide treatment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. In many patients with refractory anemia associated with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes and a 5q chromosome deletion, lenalidomide leads to transfusion independence, considerably improving quality of life. It has a manageable safety profile, and its oral formulation reduces the burden on patients. Several phase III trials are ongoing in other indications currently underserved by conventional therapy, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and prostate cancer. Several early-stage studies are exploring lenalidomide alone and in combination across different hematological malignancies, solid tumors, and immune-related disorders.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 03/2011; 1222:76-82. · 3.15 Impact Factor
-
Jesús F San-Miguel,
Meletios A Dimopoulos,
Edward A Stadtmauer,
S Vincent Rajkumar,
David Siegel,
Marie-Laure Bravo,
Marta Olesnyckyj,
Robert D Knight, Jerome B Zeldis,
Jean-Luc Harousseau,
Donna M Weber
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In two randomized phase III trials (MM-009 and MM-010), lenalidomide plus dexamethasone significantly prolonged time to progression and overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma compared with dexamethasone alone. In both trials the treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. We conducted a subanalysis to determine if continuing therapy after achieving≥partial response (PR) improved survival.
Data were collected on 212 patients who were treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone and achieved≥PR. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were compared between patients on continued treatment versus patients discontinuing therapy because of adverse events, withdrawal of consent, or other reasons. Time-dependent multivariate regression analyses were used to determine the benefit of continuing treatment with lenalidomide.
A total of 174 patients received continued treatment until disease progression or death, and 38 patients discontinued therapy without progression. There was a trend toward longer median OS in patients who continued therapy (50.9 months vs. 35.0 months; P=.0594). When controlling for the number of previous antimyeloma therapies, β2-microglobulin levels, and Durie-Salmon stage (which adversely affected survival in these patients), continued lenalidomide treatment (HR, 0.137; 95% CI, 0.045-0.417; P=.0005) or each additional cycle of lenalidomide (HR, 0.921; 95% CI, 0.886-0.957; P<.0001) were both associated with longer survival.
Continued lenalidomide treatment until disease progression after achievement of ≥PR is associated with a significant survival advantage when controlling for patient characteristics. These findings should be confirmed in a prospectively designed trial.
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia 10/2010; 11(1):38-43.
-
Jean-Luc Harousseau,
Meletios A Dimopoulos,
Michael Wang,
Alessandro Corso,
Christine Chen,
Michel Attal,
Andrew Spencer,
Zhinuan Yu,
Marta Olesnyckyj, Jerome B Zeldis,
Robert D Knight,
Donna M Weber
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This retrospective pooled analysis of two phase III trials (MM-009/MM-010) compared clinical outcomes of patients who achieved a complete response or very good partial response to treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone with the outcomes of those who only achieved a partial response.
Patients (n=353) received lenalidomide (25 mg/day for 21 days of each 28-day cycle) plus dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 for four cycles, and only on days 1-4 after the first four cycles). Time to response, duration of response, time-to-progression, overall survival, and adverse events were investigated for patients who had a complete or very good partial response and compared with those of patients who had a partial response.
At the time of unblinding, 32% of patients had achieved a complete or very good partial response and 28% had a partial response. Half (50.5%) of the patients who had a partial response as their initial response achieved a complete or very good partial response with further treatment. The probability of achieving a complete or very good partial response with continued lenalidomide treatment decreased with delayed achievement of a partial response (by cycle 4 versus later); however, it remained clinically significant. With an extended follow-up of 48 months, the median response duration, time-to-progression, and overall survival were longer in patients with a complete or very good partial response than in those with a partial response (24.0 versus 8.3 months, P<0.001; 27.7 versus 12.0 months, P<0.001; not reached versus 44.2 months, P=0.021, respectively). The benefit of a complete or very good partial response was independent of when it was achieved.
Continuing treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone to achieve best response, in the absence of disease progression and toxicity, provided deeper remissions and greater clinical benefit over time for patients in this study.
Haematologica 05/2010; 95(10):1738-44. · 6.42 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lenalidomide and other new agents are improving survival of multiple myeloma patients. This review describes current data on lenalidomide in myeloma and how the unique properties of lenalidomide may lend its use in new settings, such as maintenance and preventive therapy.
This review covers the activity of lenalidomide in multiple myeloma, efficacy in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients, how to manage effectively common adverse events observed with lenalidomide, and its potential use in new settings based on clinical trials published up to 2009.
This review describes the mechanism of action of lenalidomide in myeloma which provides the basis for its clinical use in newly diagnosed, relapsed/refractory, and high-risk smoldering myeloma in combination with other agents. Strategies to reduce or effectively manage myelosuppression and thromboembolic events, the main adverse events associated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone therapy, are also described.
Lenalidomide is an oral immunomodulatory drug that is highly effective in treating multiple myeloma, has a favorable safety profile and is now being evaluated as maintenance therapy, preventive therapy and in combination with other new agents.
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 04/2010; 11(5):829-42. · 3.20 Impact Factor
-
Thomas E Witzig,
Peter H Wiernik,
Timothy Moore,
Craig Reeder,
Craig Cole,
Glen Justice,
Henry Kaplan,
Michael Voralia,
Dennis Pietronigro,
Kenichi Takeshita,
Annette Ervin-Haynes, Jerome B Zeldis,
Julie M Vose
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lenalidomide is a novel immunomodulatory agent with antiproliferative activities. Given its efficacy in a wide range of hematologic malignancies, we conducted a phase II trial (NHL-001) of single-agent lenalidomide in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).
Patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL were eligible, with no limit on the number of previous therapies. Oral lenalidomide 25 mg was self-administered once daily on days 1 to 21 of every 28-day cycle for up to 52 weeks as tolerated, or until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary end points of duration of response (DR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.
Forty-three enrolled patients were assessable for response and safety. Patients received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1 to 17) and half were refractory to last therapy. ORR was 23% (10 of 43), including a 7% complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR rate. Twenty-seven percent (six of 22) of patients with follicular lymphoma grade 1 or 2, and 22% (four of 18) with small lymphocytic lymphoma responded to therapy. Median DR was not reached, but was longer than 16.5 months with seven of 10 responses ongoing at 15 to 28 months. Median PFS for the whole group was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 10.4 months). Adverse events were predictable and manageable; the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30% and 16%, respectively) and thrombocytopenia (14% and 5%, respectively).
Oral lenalidomide monotherapy produces durable responses with manageable adverse events in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL, warranting further investigation of treatment for indolent NHL.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 10/2009; 27(32):5404-9. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Antonio Palumbo,
Patrizia Falco,
Antonietta Falcone,
Giulia Benevolo,
Letizia Canepa,
Francesca Gay,
Alessandra Larocca,
Valeria Magarotto,
Alessandro Gozzetti,
Annalisa Luraschi,
Fortunato Morabito,
Andrea Nozza,
Robert D Knight, Jerome B Zeldis,
Mario Boccadoro,
Maria Teresa Petrucci
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Initial analysis of the combination melphalan, prednisone, plus lenalidomide (MPR) showed significant antimyeloma activity in patients with untreated multiple myeloma, with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as the most frequent side effects. This updated analysis reassessed the kinetics of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as well as the safety and efficacy of MPR.
A total of 21 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma received melphalan 0.18 mg/kg on days 1-4, prednisone 2 mg/kg on days 1-4, and lenalidomide 10 mg daily on days 1-21 for nine 28-day cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide 10 mg daily on days 1-21.
Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 52% of the patients, and granulocyte colonystimulating factor was administered in 43%. The mean neutrophil counts at the start of each MPR cycle, during nadir, and after 6 months of maintenance were 2.69 x 109/L, 1.43 x 109/L, and 2.11 x 109/L, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 24% of the patients. Platelet transfusions were required by 1 patient (5%) with a platelet count of 16 x 109/L; however, no thrombocytopenia-associated bleeding was reported. The mean platelet counts at the start of each cycle, during nadir, and after 6 months of maintenance were 174 x 109/L, 121 x 109/L, and 158 x 109/L, respectively. Median follow-up was 29.6 months, median progression-free survival was 28.5 months, and 2-year overall survival was 91%.
MPR is a promising regimen with manageable hematologic toxicity.
Clinical Lymphoma & Myeloma 05/2009; 9(2):145-50. · 1.13 Impact Factor
-
Christine Chen,
Donna E Reece,
David Siegel,
Ruben Niesvizky,
Ralph V Boccia,
Edward A Stadtmauer,
Rafat Abonour,
Paul Richardson,
Jeffrey Matous,
Shaji Kumar,
Nizar J Bahlis,
Melissa Alsina,
Robert Vescio,
Steven E Coutre,
Dennis Pietronigro,
Robert D Knight, Jerome B Zeldis,
Vincent Rajkumar
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lenalidomide gained Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with dexamethasone in June 2006. In April 2005, the FDA and patient advocacy groups requested an expanded access programme to both provide lenalidomide to patients likely to benefit and obtain additional safety information. Relapsed/refractory MM patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/d (days 1-21) and dexamethasone 40 mg/d (days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 of cycles 1-4; days 1-4 only from cycle 5 onwards), in 4-week cycles until disease progression, study drug discontinuation, or lenalidomide approval. Of the 1438 patients enrolled, approximately 60% were male, median age was 64 years, and 61.7% had Durie-Salmon stage III disease. Median time on study was 15.4 weeks (range: 0.1-49.1) and median dose was 25 mg. The most common adverse events (AEs) were haematological (49%), gastrointestinal (59%), and fatigue (55%). The most common grade > or =3 AEs were haematological (45%), fatigue (10%), and pneumonia (7%). The most common serious AEs were pneumonia (8%), pyrexia (4%), and deep-vein thrombosis (3%). Primary cause of death was disease progression (10%). Safety data confirmed known AEs of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory MM.
British Journal of Haematology 05/2009; 146(2):164-70. · 4.94 Impact Factor
-
Edward A Stadtmauer,
Donna M Weber,
Ruben Niesvizky,
Andrew Belch,
Miles H Prince,
Jesús F San Miguel,
Thierry Facon,
Marta Olesnyckyj,
Zhinuan Yu, Jerome B Zeldis,
Robert D Knight,
Meletios A Dimopoulos
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This subset analysis of data from two phase III studies in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) evaluated the benefit of initiating lenalidomide plus dexamethasone at first relapse. Multivariate analysis showed that fewer prior therapies, along with beta(2)-microglobulin (< or = 2.5 mg/L), predicted a better time to progression (TTP; study end-point) with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment. Patients with one prior therapy showed a significant improvement in benefit after first relapse compared with those who received two or more therapies. Patients with one prior therapy had significantly prolonged median TTP (17.1 vs. 10.6 months; P = 0.026) and progression-free survival (14.1 vs. 9.5 months, P = 0.047) compared with patients treated in later lines. Overall response rates were higher (66.9% vs. 56.8%, P = 0.06), and the complete response plus very good partial response rate was significantly higher in first relapse (39.8% vs. 27.7%, P = 0.025). Importantly, overall survival was significantly prolonged for patients treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone with one prior therapy, compared with patients treated later in salvage (median of 42.0 vs. 35.8 months, P = 0.041), with no differences in toxicity, dose reductions, or discontinuations despite longer treatment. Therefore, lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is both effective and tolerable for second-line MM therapy and the data suggest that the greatest benefit occurs with earlier use.
European Journal Of Haematology 03/2009; 82(6):426-32. · 2.61 Impact Factor
-
Thomas M Habermann,
Izidore S Lossos,
Glen Justice,
Julie M Vose,
Peter H Wiernik,
Kyle McBride,
Kenton Wride,
Annette Ervin-Haynes,
Kenichi Takeshita,
Dennis Pietronigro, Jerome B Zeldis,
Joseph M Tuscano
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a poor prognosis following first relapse. We present a subgroup analysis of an open-label phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. Oral lenalidomide 25 mg was self-administered once daily on days 1-21 every 28 d for up to 52 weeks, according to tolerability or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints were duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Among 15 patients with MCL with a median disease duration of 5.1 years and a median of four prior treatments, the ORR was 53%. Three patients (20%) had a complete response and 5 (33%) had a partial response. The median duration of response was 13.7 months and median PFS was 5.6 months. Four of five patients who relapsed after transplantation and two of five patients who previously received bortezomib responded to lenalidomide. The most common grade 4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia (13%) and the most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (40%), leucopenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (20%). In conclusion, oral lenalidomide monotherapy is well tolerated and active in relapsed or refractory MCL.
British Journal of Haematology 03/2009; 145(3):344-9. · 4.94 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Multiple myeloma treatment with lenalidomide-based regimens is associated with risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly during concomitant use with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). The risk of VTE in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients treated with lenalidomide is not well characterized and the background risk in untreated patients is not known. This study set out to determine the reporting rate of VTE in MDS patients on lenalidomide in the two years of postmarketing experience in the US, and to investigate whether there is a disproportional signal of VTE in MDS patients on lenalidomide by screening the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) safety database.
The MDS population exposed to lenalidomide was obtained from RevAssist, the company's proprietary restrictive distribution programme. VTE reports were identified from the company's postmarketing surveillance safety database. The FDA AERS database was used for disproportionality analysis, and signal scores computed using three algorithms: multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and reporting odds ratios (ROR).
A total of 7764 MDS patients were prescribed lenalidomide during the first two years of commercial use in the US. VTE representing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was reported in 41 patients, a reporting rate of 0.53%. The computed signal scores did not exceed the statistical threshold for identification of a significant disproportional signal for VTE in MDS reports involving use of lenalidomide without concomitant use of ESAs. However, a disproportional signal of VTE was detected in MDS reports where lenalidomide was concurrently used with ESAs.
The VTE reporting rate for MDS patients receiving lenalidomide during the first two years of postmarketing exposure was low (0.53%). Disproportionality analysis demonstrated a statistically meaningful association of VTE with lenalidomide concomitantly used with ESAs in MDS patients, but the association was not statistically significant when lenalidomide was used in the absence of ESAs.
Clinical Drug Investigation 02/2009; 29(3):161-71. · 1.82 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Clinical Oncology 01/2009; 27(1):156-7. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Michael Wang,
Meletios A Dimopoulos,
Christine Chen,
M Teresa Cibeira,
Michel Attal,
Andrew Spencer,
S Vincent Rajkumar,
Zhinuan Yu,
Marta Olesnyckyj, Jerome B Zeldis,
Robert D Knight,
Donna M Weber
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with thalidomide. Of 704 patients, 39% were thalidomide exposed. Thalidomide-exposed patients had more prior lines of therapy and longer duration of myeloma than thalidomide-naive patients. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone led to higher overall response rate (ORR), longer time to progression (TTP), and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo + dexamethasone despite prior thalidomide exposure. Among lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients, ORR was higher in thalidomide-naive versus thalidomide-exposed patients (P = .04), with longer median TTP (P = .04) and PFS (P = .02). Likewise for dexamethasone alone-treated patients (P = .03 for ORR, P = .03 for TTP, P = .06 for PFS). Prior thalidomide did not affect survival in lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients (36.1 vs 33.3 months, P > .05). Thalidomide-naive and thalidomide-exposed patients had similar toxicities. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone resulted in higher rates of venous thromboembolism, myelosuppression, and infections versus placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Lenalido-mide + dexamethasone was superior to placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Although prior thalidomide may have contributed to inferior TTP and PFS compared with thalidomide-naive patients, these parameters remained superior compared with placebo + dexamethasone; similar benefits compared with placebo + dexamethasone were not evident for thalidomide-exposed patients in terms of overall survival. Studies were registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00056160 and NCT00424047.
Blood 10/2008; 112(12):4445-51. · 9.90 Impact Factor
-
Peter H Wiernik,
Izidore S Lossos,
Joseph M Tuscano,
Glen Justice,
Julie M Vose,
Craig E Cole,
Wendy Lam,
Kyle McBride,
Kenton Wride,
Dennis Pietronigro,
Kenichi Takeshita,
Annette Ervin-Haynes, Jerome B Zeldis,
Thomas M Habermann
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The major cause of death in aggressive lymphoma is relapse or nonresponse to initial therapy. Lenalidomide has activity in a variety of hematologic malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We report the results of a phase II, single-arm, multicenter trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide oral monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL.
Patients were treated with oral lenalidomide 25 mg once daily on days 1 to 21, every 28 days, for 52 weeks, until disease progression or intolerance. The primary end point was response; secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.
Forty-nine patients with a median age of 65 years received lenalidomide in this study. The most common histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (53%), and patients had received a median of four prior treatment regimens for NHL. An objective response rate of 35% was observed in 49 treated patients, including a 12% rate of complete response/unconfirmed complete response. Responses were observed in each aggressive histologic subtype tested (diffuse large B-cell, follicular center grade 3, mantle cell, and transformed lymphomas). Of patients with stable disease or partial response at first assessment, 25% improved with continued treatment. Estimated median duration of response was 6.2 months, and median PFS was 4.0 months. The most common grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (8.2%) and thrombocytopenia (8.2%); the most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (24.5%), leukopenia (14.3%), and thrombocytopenia (12.2%).
Oral lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL, with manageable side effects.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 08/2008; 26(30):4952-7. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
S Vincent Rajkumar,
Laura Rosiñol,
Mohamad Hussein,
John Catalano,
Wieslaw Jedrzejczak,
Lela Lucy,
Marta Olesnyckyj,
Zhinuan Yu,
Robert Knight, Jerome B Zeldis,
Joan Bladé
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The long-term impact of thalidomide plus dexamethasone (thal/dex) as primary therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) is unknown. The goal of this study was to compare thalidomide plus dexamethasone versus placebo plus dexamethasone (placebo/dex)as primary therapy for newly diagnosed MM.
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with untreated symptomatic MM were randomized to thal/dex (arm A) or to placebo plus dexamethasone (dex) (arm B). Patients in arm A received oral thalidomide 50 mg daily, escalated to 100 mg on day 15, and to 200 mg from day 1 of cycle 2 (28-day cycles). Oral dex 40 mg was administered on days 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and 17 through 20 during cycles 1 through 4 and on days 1 through 4 only from cycle 5 onwards. Patients in arm B received placebo and dex, administered as in arm A. The primary end point of the study was time to progression. This study is registered at http://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00057564).
A total of 470 patients were enrolled (235 randomly assigned to thal/dex and 235 to placebo/dex). The overall response rate was significantly higher with thal/dex compared with placebo/dex (63% v 46%), P < .001. Time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer with thal/dex compared with placebo/dex (median, 22.6 v 6.5 months, P < .001). Grade 4 adverse events were more frequent with thal/dex than with placebo/dex (30.3% v 22.8%).
Thal/dex results in significantly higher response rates and significantly prolongs TTP compared with dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed MM.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 05/2008; 26(13):2171-7. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Azra Raza,
James A Reeves,
Eric J Feldman,
Gordon W Dewald,
John M Bennett,
H Joachim Deeg,
Luke Dreisbach,
Charles A Schiffer,
Richard M Stone,
Peter L Greenberg,
Peter T Curtin,
Virginia M Klimek,
Jamile M Shammo,
Deborah Thomas,
Robert D Knight,
Michele Schmidt,
Kenton Wride, Jerome B Zeldis,
Alan F List
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lenalidomide is approved for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent anemia due to low or intermediate-1 (int-1) risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) associated with a chromosome 5q deletion with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities. We report results of a multicenter, phase 2 trial evaluating lenalidomide therapy for transfusion-dependent patients with low- or int-1-risk MDS without deletion 5q. Eligible patients had 50,000/mm(3) or more platelets and required 2 U or more RBCs within the previous 8 weeks; 214 patients received 10 mg oral lenalidomide daily or 10 mg on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (30%) and thrombocytopenia (25%). Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 56 (26%) patients achieved transfusion independence (TI) after a median of 4.8 weeks of treatment with a median duration of TI of 41.0 weeks. In patients who achieved TI, the median rise in hemoglobin was 32 g/L (3.2 g/dL; range, 10-98 g/L [1.0-9.8 g/dL]) from baseline. A 50% or greater reduction in transfusion requirement occurred in 37 additional patients, yielding a 43% overall rate of hematologic improvement (TI response + ||>or= 50% reduction in transfusion requirement). Lenalidomide has clinically meaningful activity in transfusion-dependent patients with low- or int-1-risk MDS who lack the deletion 5q karyotypic abnormality.
Blood 01/2008; 111(1):86-93. · 9.90 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lenalidomide (Revlimid) is an immunomodulatory drug and an analogue of thalidomide, a known teratogen. To prevent fetal exposure, in the US lenalidomide is available only under a special restricted distribution programme called RevAssist. Under this risk minimization programme, only prescribers and contract pharmacies registered with the programme are able to prescribe and dispense the product. Patients must be advised of, agree to and comply with the requirements of the RevAssist programme in order to receive lenalidomide through a registered prescriber. A total of 15 584 patients were registered in the RevAssist programme during the first year lenalidomide was on the market. There were four reports of false-positive beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin measurements in patients aged 43-57 years. Mandatory patient and prescriber surveys have shown discrepant responses that were resolved by risk management intervention specialists 99% of the time. The voluntary patient surveys have shown understanding of the risks of lenalidomide use and of behaviours necessary to minimize risks in >95% of females of childbearing potential and adult males. To date, there have been no reports of pregnancy in female patients or female partners of male patients. The pharmacy audit findings showed compliance with RevAssist was high. Although RevAssist is labour-intensive, time-consuming and costly, it continues to be effective in preventing fetal exposure to lenalidomide.
Drug Safety 01/2008; 31(9):743-52. · 3.63 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Clinical Oncology 12/2007; 25(31):5047. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The present study investigated the effect of renal impairment and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide following a single 25-mg oral dose in 30 subjects aged 39 to 76 years. A single 25-mg dose was well tolerated by renally impaired subjects. Renal impairment did not alter the oral absorption, protein binding, or nonrenal elimination of lenalidomide. Mean urinary recovery of unchanged lenalidomide was 84% of the dose in subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CL(Cr)] > 80 mL/min), and it declined to 69%, 38%, and 43% in subjects with mild (50 < or = CL(Cr) < or = 80 mL/min), moderate (30 < or = CL(Cr) < 50 mL/min), and severe (CL(Cr) < 30 mL/min) renal impairment, respectively. The differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between normal renal function and mild renal impairment were minor to modest (11%-32%). As renal impairment progressed to moderate, severe, or end-stage renal disease, total and renal lenalidomide clearance decreased drastically, area under the concentration-time curve increased by approximately 185% to 420%, and t((1/2)) was prolonged by approximately 6 to 12 hours. A 4-hour hemodialysis removed 31% of lenalidomide in the body. Therefore, lenalidomide dose adjustments should be considered for patients with CL(Cr) < 50 mL/min, and the recommendations are given for the starting doses.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 12/2007; 47(12):1466-75. · 2.91 Impact Factor
