Tommi Nyrönen

Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Western Finland, Finland

Are you Tommi Nyrönen?

Claim your profile

Publications (8)29.95 Total impact

  • Article: Computationally identified novel diphenyl- and phenylpyridine androgen receptor antagonist structures.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have identified and profiled a set of androgen receptor (AR) binding compounds representing two nonsteroidal scaffolds from a public chemical database supplied by Asinex with virtual screening procedure incorporating our recently published 3D QSAR model of AR ligands. The diphenyl- and phenylpyridine-based compounds act as antagonists in wild-type AR in CV1 cells and also retain this antagonistic character in CV1 cells expressing T877A mutant receptor. This mutation is frequently associated with prostate cancer. Two of the compounds repress the androgen-dependent cell growth of LNCaP prostate cancer cells expressing the T877A AR mutant. Molecular modeling of the observed in vitro antagonism with induced fit docking suggests that W741 and M895 could be mechanistically involved in the initiation of the antagonism. The results indicate finding of nonsteroidal AR antagonist compounds from a public chemical database with computational methods. Compounds could serve as a novel platform to develop more potent AR antagonists with inhibitory activity in both wild-type and T877A mutant AR.
    Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 09/2008; 48(9):1882-90. · 4.68 Impact Factor
  • Article: Small molecule designed to target metal binding site in the alpha2I domain inhibits integrin function.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Integrin alpha2beta1 is a potential target molecule in drug development. We have established "design" criteria for molecules that bind to the "closed" conformation of alpha2I domain via Mg(2+) in MIDAS (metal ion dependent adhesion site) while simultaneously forming interactions with neighboring amino acid residues. Specific tetracyclic Streptomyces products belonging to the group of aromatic polyketides fulfill our criteria and inhibit alpha2beta1 integrin. All previously described inhibitors of alphaI domain integrins act in an allosteric manner.
    Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 06/2007; 50(11):2742-6. · 5.25 Impact Factor
  • Article: Molecular evolution of adrenoceptors and dopamine receptors: implications for the binding of catecholamines.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We derived homology models for all human catecholamine-binding GPCRs (CABRs; the alpha-1, alpha-2, and beta-adrenoceptors and the D1-type and D2-type dopamine receptor) using the bovine rhodopsin-11-cis-retinal X-ray structure. Interactions were predicted from the endogenous ligands norepinephrine or dopamine and from the binding site and were used to optimize receptor-ligand interactions. Similar binding modes in the complexes agree with a large "binding core" conserved across the CABRs, that is, D3.32, V(I)3.33, T3.37, S5.42, S(A/C)5.43, S5.46, F6.51, F6.52, and W6.48. Model structures and docking simulations suggest that extracellular loop 2 could provide a common attachment point for the ligands' beta-hydroxyl via a hydrogen bond donated by the main-chain NH group of residue xl2.52. The modeled CABRs and docking modes are in good agreement with published experimental studies. Complementarity between the ligand and the binding site suggests that the bovine rhodopsin structure is a suitable template for modeling agonist-bound CABRs.
    Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 04/2006; 49(5):1706-19. · 5.25 Impact Factor
  • Article: Model structures of alpha-2 adrenoceptors in complex with automatically docked antagonist ligands raise the possibility of interactions dissimilar from agonist ligands.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antagonist binding to alpha-2 adrenoceptors (alpha2-ARs) is not well understood. Structural models were constructed for the three human alpha2-AR subtypes based on the bovine rhodopsin X-ray structure. Twelve antagonist ligands (including covalently binding phenoxybenzamine) were automatically docked to the models. A hallmark of agonist binding is the electrostatic interaction between a positive charge on the agonist and the negatively charged side chain of D3.32. For antagonist binding, ion-pair formation would require deviations of the models from the rhodopsin structural template, e.g., a rotation of TM3 to relocate D3.32 more centrally within the binding cavity, and/or creation of new space near TM2/TM7 such that antagonists would be shifted away from TM5. Thus, except for the quinazolines, antagonist ligands automatically docked to the model structures did not form ion-pairs with D3.32. This binding mode represents a valid alternative, whereby the positive charge on the antagonists is stabilized by cation-pi interactions with aromatic residues (e.g., F6.51) and antagonists interact with D3.32 via carboxylate-aromatic interactions. This binding mode is in good agreement with maps derived from a molecular interaction library that predicts favorable atomic contacts; similar interaction environments are seen for unrelated proteins in complex with ligands sharing similarities with the alpha2-AR antagonists.
    Journal of Structural Biology 06/2005; 150(2):126-43. · 3.41 Impact Factor
  • Article: BODIL: a molecular modeling environment for structure-function analysis and drug design.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BODIL is a molecular modeling environment geared to help the user to quickly identify key features of proteins critical to molecular recognition, especially (1) in drug discovery applications, and (2) to understand the structural basis for function. The program incorporates state-of-the-art graphics, sequence and structural alignment methods, among other capabilities needed in modern structure-function-drug target research. BODIL has a flexible design that allows on-the-fly incorporation of new modules, has intelligent memory management, and fast multi-view graphics. A beta version of BODIL and an accompanying tutorial are available at http://www.abo.fi/fak/mnf/bkf/research/johnson/bodil.html.
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 07/2004; 18(6):401-19. · 3.39 Impact Factor
  • Article: Molecular mechanisms of ligand-receptor interactions in transmembrane domain V of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. The structural determinants of catechol hydroxyl interactions with adrenergic receptors were examined using 12 alpha2-adrenergic agonists and a panel of mutated human alpha2A-adrenoceptors. The alpha2ASer201 mutant had a Cys --> Ser201 (position 5.43) amino-acid substitution, and alpha2ASer201Cys200 and alpha2ASer201Cys204 had Ser --> Cys200 (5.42) and Ser --> Cys204 (5.46) substitutions, respectively, in addition to the Cys --> Ser201 substitution. 2. Automated docking methods were used to predict the receptor interactions of the ligands. Radioligand-binding assays and functional [35S]GTPgammaS-binding assays were performed using transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells to experimentally corroborate the predicted binding modes. 3. The hydroxyl groups of phenethylamines were found to have different effects on ligand affinity towards the activated and resting forms of the wild-type alpha2A-adrenoceptor. Substitution of Ser200 or Ser204 with cysteine caused a deterioration in the capability of catecholamines to activate the alpha2A-adrenoceptor. The findings indicate that (i) Cys201 plays a significant role in the binding of catecholamine ligands and UK14,304 (for the latter, by a hydrophobic interaction), but Cys201 is not essential for receptor activation; (ii) Ser200 interacts with the meta-hydroxyl group of phenethylamine ligands, affecting both catecholamine binding and receptor activation; while (iii) substituting Ser204 with a cysteine interferes both with the binding of catecholamine ligands and with receptor activation, due to an interaction between Ser204 and the para-hydroxyl group of the catecholic ring.
    British Journal of Pharmacology 10/2003; 140(2):347-58. · 4.41 Impact Factor
  • Article: Determinants of antagonist binding at the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor subunit, GluR-D. Role of the conserved arginine 507 and glutamate 727 residues.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous structural and mutagenesis studies indicate that the invariant alpha-amino and alpha-carboxyl groups of glutamate receptor agonists are engaged in polar interactions with oppositely charged, conserved arginine and glutamate residues in the ligand-binding domain of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor. To examine the role of these residues (R507 and E727 in the GluR-D subunit) in the discrimination between agonists and antagonists, we analyzed the ligand-binding properties of homomeric GluR-D and its soluble ligand-binding domain with mutations at these positions. Filter-binding assays using [3H]AMPA, an agonist, and [3H]Ro 48-8587, a high-affinity antagonist, as radioligands revealed that even a conservative mutation at R507 (R507K) resulted in the complete loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. In contrast, a negative charge at position 727 was necessary for agonist binding, whereas the isosteric mutation, E727Q, abolished all agonist binding but retained high-affinity binding for [3H]Ro 48-8587, displaceable by 7,8-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione. Competition binding studies with antagonists representing different structural classes in combination with ligand docking experiments suggest that the role of E727 is antagonist-specific, ranging from no interaction to weak electrostatic interactions involving indirect and direct hydrogen bonding with the antagonist molecule. These results underline the importance of ion pair interaction with E727 for agonist activity and suggest that an interaction with R507, but not with E727, is essential for antagonist binding.
    European Journal of Biochemistry 01/2003; 269(24):6261-70. · 3.58 Impact Factor
  • Article: Determinants of antagonist binding at the α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid receptor subunit, GluR‐D
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous structural and mutagenesis studies indicate that the invariant -amino and -carboxyl groups of glutamate receptor agonists are engaged in polar interactions with oppositely charged, conserved arginine and glutamate residues in the ligand-binding domain of -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor. To examine the role of these residues (R507 and E727 in the GluR-D subunit) in the discrimination between agonists and antagonists, we analyzed the ligand-binding properties of homomeric GluR-D and its soluble ligand-binding domain with mutations at these positions. Filter-binding assays using [3H]AMPA, an agonist, and [3H]Ro 48–8587, a high-affinity antagonist, as radioligands revealed that even a conservative mutation at R507 (R507K) resulted in the complete loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. In contrast, a negative charge at position 727 was necessary for agonist binding, whereas the isosteric mutation, E727Q, abolished all agonist binding but retained high-affinity binding for [3H]Ro 48–8587, displaceable by 7,8-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione. Competition binding studies with antagonists representing different structural classes in combination with ligand docking experiments suggest that the role of E727 is antagonist-specific, ranging from no interaction to weak electrostatic interactions involving indirect and direct hydrogen bonding with the antagonist molecule. These results underline the importance of ion pair interaction with E727 for agonist activity and suggest that an interaction with R507, but not with E727, is essential for antagonist binding.
    European Journal of Biochemistry. 12/2002; 269(24):6261 - 6270.