I A Glukhov

Publications (8)2.5 Total impact

• Article: Retrotransposon gtwin specific for the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

  A P Kotnova, M A Feoktistova, I A Glukhov, V B Salenko, N V Lyubomirskaya, A I Kimb, Y V Ilyina
  Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics 06/2006; 409:233-5. · 0.33 Impact Factor
• Article: [Mobile genetic element MDG4 (gypsy) in Drosophila melanogaster. Features of structure and regulation of transposition].

  L K Kusulidu, N N Karpova, O V Razorenova, I A Glukhov, A I Kim, N V Liubomirskaia, Iu V Il'in
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Distribution of two structural functional variants of the MDG4 (gypsy) mobile genetic element was examined in 44 strains of Drosophila melanogaster. The results obtained suggest that less transpositionally active MDG4 variant is more ancient component of the Drosophila genome. Using Southern blotting, five strains characterized by increased copy number of MDG4 with significant prevalence of the active variant over the less active one were selected for further analysis. Genetic analysis of these strains led to the suggestion that some of them carry factors that mobilize MDG4 independently from the cellular flamenco gene known to be responsible for transposition of this element. Other strains probably contained a suppressor of the flam- mutant allele causing active transpositions of the MDG4. Thus, the material for studying poorly examined relationships between the retrovirus and the host cell genome was obtained.
  Genetika 01/2002; 37(12):1589-97. · 0.44 Impact Factor
• Article: Mobile Genetic Element gypsy(MDG4) in Drosophila melanogasterStrains: Structural Characteristics and Regulation of Transposition

  L. K. Kousoulidou, N. N. Karpova, O. V. Razorenova, I. A. Glukhov, A. I. Kim, N. V. Lyubomirskaya, Y. V. Ilyin
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Distribution of two structural functional variants of the gypsy(MDG4) mobile genetic element was examined in 44 strains of Drosophila melenogaster. The results obtained suggest that less transpositionally active gypsyvariant is more ancient component of the Drosophilagenome. Using Southern blotting, five strains characterized by increased copy number of gypsywith significant prevalence of the active variant over the less active one were selected for further analysis. Genetic analysis of these strains led to the suggestion that some of them carry factors that mobilize gypsyindependently from the cellular flamencogene known to be responsible for transposition of this element. Other strains probably contained a suppressor of the flam –mutant allele causing active transpositions of the gypsy. Thus, the material for studying poorly examined relationships between the retrovirus and the host cell genome was obtained.
  Russian Journal of Genetics 11/2001; 37(12):1335-1342. · 0.43 Impact Factor
• Article: Structural Polymorphism of the Transposable Element MDG4 (gypsy) in Drosophila melanogasterStrains

  L. K. Kusulidu, N. N. Karpova, O. V. Razorenova, I. A. Glukhov, A. I. Kim, N. V. Lyubomirskaya, Yu. V. Ilyin
  Doklady Biological Sciences 12/2000; 376(1):54-58.
• Article: A rare family of gtwin retrotransposon carrying a mutation in the tRNA-primer binding site is amplified in G-32 Drosophila melanogaster strain.

  V B Salenko, A P Kotnova, I A Glukhov, Yu E Stefanov, S A Surkov, N V Lyubomirskaya, Y V Ilyin
  Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics 436:16-9. · 0.33 Impact Factor
• Article: Long deletion hot spots inside retrotransposon 297.

  I A Glukhov, V B Salenko, Y E Stefanov, Y V Ilyin
  Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics 444:171-4. · 0.33 Impact Factor
• Article: Characteristics of retrotransposition activity of the gtwin retrovirus of the Drosophila melanogaster line G32.

  Y E Stefanov, A P Kotnova, I A Glukhov, N V Lyubomirskaya, Y V Ilyin
  Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics 424:42-5. · 0.33 Impact Factor
• Article: Structural characteristics of the third open reading frame of the retrotransposon gtwin in different strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

  I A Glukhov, N N Karpova, A P Kotnova, N V Lyubomirskaya, Y V Ilyin
  Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics 399:341-3. · 0.33 Impact Factor