Alastair J Flint

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Are you Alastair J Flint?

Claim your profile

Publications (27)105.1 Total impact

  • Article: The Incidence of Tardive Dyskinesia in the Study of Pharmacotherapy for Psychotic Depression.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a debilitating adverse effect associated with antipsychotic treatment. Older age and the presence of mood disorder have been identified as risk factors for the development of TD. Thus, we assessed the incidence of TD in younger and older patients with major depressive disorder with psychotic features who participated in a 12-week clinical trial comparing olanzapine plus sertraline versus olanzapine plus placebo. All subjects (n = 259) were assessed with the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment (or at termination). We used 7 different published criteria to estimate the prevalence of TD at baseline and the incidence over the duration of the trial. We compared the incidence of TD in subjects 60 years or older and those younger than 60 years. The overall prevalence and incidence of TD varied almost 10-fold, depending on the criteria (prevalence range, 1.2%-8.9%; incidence range, 0.0%-5.9%). Tardive dyskinesia was observed as a clinical adverse event in only 1 subject (0.4%). Whereas older subjects had a higher prevalence of TD at baseline, the incidence in younger and older subjects did not differ significantly. The incidence of TD was relatively low in both younger and older patients with major depressive disorder with psychotic features treated acutely with olanzapine. However, the estimate of the risk of TD varies widely, depending on the criteria used to define TD.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 04/2013; · 5.09 Impact Factor
  • Article: Sustaining remission of psychotic depression: rationale, design and methodology of STOP-PD.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Psychotic depression (PD) is a severe disabling disorder with considerable morbidity and mortality. Electroconvulsive therapy and pharmacotherapy are each efficacious in the treatment of PD. Expert guidelines recommend the combination of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications in the acute pharmacologic treatment of PD. However, little is known about the continuation treatment of PD. Of particular concern, it is not known whether antipsychotic medication needs to be continued once an episode of PD responds to pharmacotherapy. This issue has profound clinical importance. On the one hand, the unnecessary continuation of antipsychotic medication exposes a patient to adverse effects, such as weight gain and metabolic disturbance. On the other hand, premature discontinuation of antipsychotic medication has the potential risk of early relapse of a severe disorder.Methods/design: The primary goal of this multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial is to assess the risks and benefits of continuing antipsychotic medication in persons with PD once the episode of depression has responded to treatment with an antidepressant and an antipsychotic. Secondary goals are to examine age and genetic polymorphisms as predictors or moderators of treatment variability, potentially leading to more personalized treatment of PD. Individuals aged 18-85 years with unipolar psychotic depression receive up to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with sertraline and olanzapine. Participants who achieve remission of psychosis and remission/near-remission of depressive symptoms continue with 8 weeks of open-label treatment to ensure stability of remission. Participants with stability of remission are then randomized to 36 weeks of double-blind treatment with either sertraline and olanzapine or sertraline and placebo. Relapse is the primary outcome. Metabolic changes are a secondary outcome. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide clinicians with much-needed evidence to guide the continuation and maintenance treatment of one of the most disabling and lethal of psychiatric disorders.Trial registration and URL: Clinicaltrials.govRegistry ID: NCT01427608.
    BMC Psychiatry 01/2013; 13(1):38. · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • Article: Impact of prior pharmacotherapy on remission of psychotic depression in a randomized controlled trial.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Having failed to respond to an adequate antidepressant treatment course predicts poorer treatment outcomes in patients with major depression. However, little is known about the impact of prior treatment on the outcome of major depression with psychotic features (MDpsy). We examined the effect of prior treatment history on the outcome of pharmacotherapy of MDpsy in patients who participated in the STOPD-PD study, a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing a combination of olanzapine plus sertraline vs. olanzapine plus placebo. The strength of treatment courses received prior to randomization was classified using a validated method. A hierarchy of outcomes was hypothesized based on treatments received prior to randomization and randomized treatment. A high remission rate was observed in subjects with a history of no prior treatment or inadequate treatment who were treated with a combination of olanzapine and sertraline. A low remission rate was observed in subjects who had previously failed to respond to an antidepressant alone and who were treated with olanzapine monotherapy. A low remission rate was also observed in subjects who had previously failed to respond to a combination of an antipsychotic and an antidepressant. Similar to patients with major depression, these results emphasize the impact of prior pharmacotherapy on treatment outcomes in patients with MDpsy.
    Journal of psychiatric research 02/2011; 45(7):896-901. · 3.72 Impact Factor
  • Article: Effect of age on the frequency of anxiety disorders in major depression with psychotic features.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the frequency of anxiety disorders in older and younger persons with major depressive disorder with psychotic features. Cross-sectional. University medical centers. Two hundred fifty-nine persons (N = 117 aged 18-59 years and N = 142 aged > or =60 years) with major depressive disorder with psychotic features who were enrolled in the Study of the Pharmacotherapy of Psychotic Depression (STOP-PD). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, (DSM-IV) defined anxiety disorders were determined by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV interview at baseline assessment. Younger and older participants were compared on the frequencies of any current anxiety disorder and any lifetime anxiety disorder, as well as the frequencies of individual anxiety disorders. Older persons had significantly lower frequencies of any current anxiety disorder and any lifetime anxiety disorder, even after controlling for relevant demographic and clinical variables. With respect to specific anxiety disorders, older persons had significantly lower frequencies of current and lifetime panic disorder, current and lifetime social anxiety disorder, and current and lifetime posttraumatic stress disorder. The findings of this study are consistent with those of community-based epidemiologic surveys that anxiety disorders are less prevalent in older than younger adults. Because of the rigorous assessment used in STOP-PD, our findings suggest that the age-related decline in the prevalence of anxiety disorders is not simply due to a failure to detect cases in older people, as has been previously suggested.
    The American journal of geriatric psychiatry: official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 05/2010; 18(5):404-12. · 3.35 Impact Factor
  • Article: A double-blind randomized controlled trial of olanzapine plus sertraline vs olanzapine plus placebo for psychotic depression: the study of pharmacotherapy of psychotic depression (STOP-PD).
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence for the efficacy of combination pharmacotherapy has been limited and without positive trials in geriatric patients with major depression (MD) with psychotic features. To compare remission rates of MD with psychotic features in those treated with a combination of atypical antipsychotic medication plus a serotonin reuptake inhibitor with those treated with antipsychotic monotherapy; and to compare response by age. Twelve-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Clinical services of 4 academic sites. Patients Two hundred fifty-nine subjects with MD with psychotic features randomized by age (<60 or > or =60 years) (mean [standard deviation (SD)], 41.3 [10.8] years in 117 younger adults vs 71.7 [7.8] years in 142 geriatric participants). Intervention Target doses of 15 to 20 mg of olanzapine per day plus masked sertraline or placebo at 150 to 200 mg per day. Main Outcome Measure Remission rates of MD with psychotic features. Treatment with olanzapine/sertraline was associated with higher remission rates during the trial than olanzapine/placebo (odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.47; P < .001); 41.9% of subjects who underwent combination therapy were in remission at their last assessment compared with 23.9% of subjects treated with monotherapy (chi(2)(1) = 9.53, P = .002). Combination therapy was comparably superior in both younger (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.50; P = .02) and older (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.66; P = .01) adults. Overall, tolerability was comparable across age groups. Both age groups had significant increases in cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, but statistically significant increases in glucose occurred only in younger adults. Younger adults gained significantly more weight than older subjects (mean [SD], 6.5 [6.6] kg vs 3.3 [4.9] kg, P = .001). Combination pharmacotherapy is efficacious for the treatment of MD with psychotic features. Future research must determine the benefits vs risks of continuing atypical antipsychotic medications beyond 12 weeks. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00056472.
    Archives of general psychiatry 09/2009; 66(8):838-47. · 12.26 Impact Factor
  • Article: Late-life generalized anxiety: the constraint of categorization.
    Alastair J Flint
    The American journal of geriatric psychiatry: official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 07/2009; 17(6):441-4. · 3.35 Impact Factor
  • Article: Rates and patterns of treatment seeking by individuals with mood and anxiety disorders.
    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) 11/2008; 59(10):1099. · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • Article: Correlates of suicidality among patients with psychotic depression.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The independent association of age and other factors with suicidality in patients with major depression with psychotic features was examined. Of the 183 study participants, 21% had a suicide attempt during the current episode. Male gender, Hispanic background, past suicide attempt, higher depression scores, and higher cognitive scores were each independently associated with greater intensity of current suicidality. Older age was independently associated with a lower risk of a lifetime suicide attempt. These findings reinforce the evidence that patients with psychotic depression are at high risk for suicide and underscore the importance of examining correlates of suicidality specific to patients with psychotic depression.
    Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 09/2008; 38(4):403-14. · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • Article: Does major depressive disorder with somatic delusions constitute a distinct subtype of major depressive disorder with psychotic features?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Among patients with major depression with psychotic features, little is known about the extent to which those with and without somatic delusions differ. The first 183 participants in the STOP-PD study were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of somatic delusions and were compared on multiple demographic and clinical characteristics. In the multivariate analysis, those with somatic delusions reported more somatic symptoms, rated their health as worse, and were less likely to have persecutory delusions. Based on the methods we used, we could not detect meaningful differences between subjects with and without somatic delusions. This suggests that the presence of irrational somatic ideation does not define a distinct clinical subgroup among patients with psychotic depression. This finding needs to be replicated.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 07/2008; 112(1-3):250-5. · 3.52 Impact Factor
  • Article: Weight gain during olanzapine treatment for psychotic depression: effects of dose and age.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Weight gain has often been associated with olanzapine treatment, yet little is known about the influence of patient age or cumulative dose on olanzapine-associated weight gain. The first 118 participants in the National Institutes of Mental Health Study of the Pharmacotherapy of Psychotic Depression randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NCT00056472) completing at least 4 weeks of treatment with olanzapine were analyzed to determine the relationship between weight gain, age, and cumulative olanzapine dose. Younger (age 18-59 years) and older (age 60+ years) participants received open-label olanzapine and either sertraline or placebo for up to 12 weeks. Linear mixed effect regression modeling was used to determine the effects of age and cumulative olanzapine dose on weight gain, controlling for potential confounders. Age was observed to have a significant negative association with weight gain (P=0.01), even after controlling for differences in cumulative dose and baseline body mass index. Each 10-year increase in age was associated with a decrease in mean weight gain over 12 weeks of approximately 0.6 kg (95% confidence interval: 0.14-1.05 kg). Cumulative olanzapine dose was also significantly associated with weight gain (P<0.0001). Approximately 60% of completers of the 12-week trial experienced clinically significant weight gain (> or =7% of baseline weight).
    International Clinical Psychopharmacology 06/2008; 23(3):130-7. · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Article: Missed diagnosis of psychotic depression at 4 academic medical centers.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major depressive disorder with psychotic features (psychotic depression), though occurring relatively frequently in the general population, is a commonly missed psychiatric diagnosis. To ascertain accuracy of diagnosis of psychotic depression among inpatients at 4 academic medical centers and explore whether presenting symptoms, treatment setting, and physician's level of training affect the accuracy of diagnosis. The medical records of 65 patients who met DSM-IV criteria for psychotic depression following systematic assessment were analyzed to ascertain the concordance between chart diagnoses and research diagnoses arrived at using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. The patients were participants in the National Institute of Mental Health Study of Pharmacotherapy of Psychotic Depression, conducted from December 28, 2002, through June 18, 2004, at 4 academic medical centers. For each patient's hospital visit, separate standardized data forms were completed on the basis of each physician's assessment of the patient prior to screening for the study. Hospital records from the emergency room and from admission to psychiatric units were reviewed. Among these 65 patients, 130 chart diagnoses had been made. Psychotic depression had not been diagnosed prior to research assessments for 27% of the 130 diagnoses in our sample. The 3 most common diagnoses assigned to patients meeting research criteria for psychotic depression were major depressive disorder without psychotic features, depression not otherwise specified, and mood disorder not otherwise specified. Failure to identify psychotic depression was more likely when symptoms of depressed mood, hallucinations, or delusions were not noted in the medical record (all p < .005). The accuracy of diagnoses was greater on inpatient units than in emergency rooms (chi(2) = 7.64, p < .01). The diagnosis of psychotic depression is frequently missed in emergency room and inpatient settings. The findings of this study are sobering given the serious morbidity and mortality of psychotic depression and the implications for treatment if an inaccurate diagnosis is made. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00056472.
    The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 05/2008; 69(8):1293-6. · 5.80 Impact Factor
  • Article: Persisting low use of antipsychotics in the treatment of major depressive disorder with psychotic features.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Practice guidelines recommend the use of a combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic for the pharmacologic treatment of major depressive disorder with psychotic features (MD-Psy). We assessed the extent to which the pharmacotherapy received by patients with MD-Psy under usual care conforms to these recommendations. We assessed the pharmacotherapy received under usual care conditions by 100 patients with MD-Psy prior to enrollment in STOP-PD (Study of the Pharmacotherapy of Psychotic Depression), a 12-week randomized, controlled trial comparing olanzapine plus sertraline to olanzapine plus placebo. Our assessment took place from January 2003 to May 2004. The strength of antidepressant trials was rated using the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF). The strength of antipsychotic trials or combinations of antidepressants and antipsychotics was rated using a modified version of the ATHF. We also determined whether the strength of antipsychotic or combination trials was associated with age, the duration of the current depressive episode, medical burden, cognitive status, or the severity of depressive or psychotic symptoms. Most patients with MD-Psy were treated with antidepressants (N = 82, 82%) or antipsychotics (N = 65, 65%). About half of the patients (N = 48, 48%) received therapeutic doses of an antidepressant; 10% (N = 10) received an intermediate dose of an antipsychotic, and 6% (N = 6) received a high dose. Overall, only 5% (N = 5) received a combination of an adequate dose of an antidepressant and a high dose of an antipsychotic. The strength of both antipsychotic trials (p = .021) and combination trials (p = .039) was significantly associated only with a longer duration of the current depressive episode. These findings show a persisting low use of antipsychotics in the treatment of MD-Psy. Given the high morbidity rates associated with MD-Psy, it is important to continue to educate clinicians regarding its identification and treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00056472.
    The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 03/2007; 68(2):194-200. · 5.80 Impact Factor
  • Article: A delusion assessment scale for psychotic major depression: Reliability, validity, and utility.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although delusions are the hallmark of major depression with psychotic features, a scale to measure the intensity of beliefs across multiple delusional domains in this condition has been unavailable. The development and assessment of the Delusional Assessment Scale (DAS) are described. Scale items were selected initially based on previous studies of delusional ideation in schizophrenia. A three-point item to assess mood congruence was added. A 15-item scale was assessed in 92 subjects participating in the four-site collaborative study of the pharmacotherapy of major depression with psychotic features. Maximum likelihood method was used to determine scale factors. The internal consistency of these factors was determined. Comparisons between scale scores and ratings from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Overall and Gorham 1962) were used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. The data were fit by a five-factors model (impact, conviction, disorganization, bizarreness, and extension). Inter-rater reliability of the five factors ranged from .77 for conviction and .74 for impact to .37 for disorganization. Internal consistency for each of the five factors was > or =.72. Scores on specific domains were significantly correlated with the BPRS unusual thought content item and positive symptom subscale scores. The DAS is a reliable measure of 5 delusional domains.
    Biological Psychiatry 01/2007; 60(12):1336-42. · 8.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Generalised anxiety disorder in elderly patients : epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment options.
    Alastair J Flint
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) is characterised by at least 6 months of excessive uncontrollable worry accompanied by symptoms of motor tension and vigilance and scanning. As with other anxiety disorders, GAD is less prevalent in older adults than younger adults. GAD has a high level of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders and this has a bearing on estimates of its prevalence. GAD that is comorbid with another psychiatric disorder has a period prevalence of approximately 4% in community-dwelling older people. On the other hand, 'pure' GAD is less common, with a period prevalence of approximately 1%. Pure GAD in late life is a fairly even mix of chronic cases that began earlier in life and cases starting for the first time in later life. The most frequent and consistent finding regarding late-life generalised anxiety is its high level of comorbidity with major depression. There are few longitudinal data pertaining to the temporal association of generalised anxiety and major depression in late life, but the data that do exist suggest that the anxiety is frequently symptomatic of the depression. If generalised anxiety occurs exclusively during episodes of major depression, a separate diagnosis of GAD is not warranted. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is the most frequently studied psychological treatment for GAD. Although CBT is more effective than a wait-list control condition, it is not more effective than nondirective therapies in late-life GAD. Furthermore, a standard course of CBT appears to be less efficacious for GAD in older adults than younger adults. Further research is needed to develop more efficacious and specific forms of psychotherapy for late-life GAD. The three classes of medications that are most commonly used for GAD are: (i) antidepressants; (ii) benzodiazepines; and (iii) buspirone. Antidepressant medication is the pharmacological treatment of choice for most older adults with generalised anxiety. When generalised anxiety is secondary to an episode of major depression, the selection of an antidepressant is guided by the same principles that apply to treatment of nonanxious depression. Antidepressant medication is also effective for GAD in the absence of an episode of major depression. In this situation, citalopram and venlafaxine have been found to be efficacious in older people. Data from studies of mixed-aged patients suggest that escitalopram, paroxetine and trazodone may also be beneficial in late-life GAD. Despite their widespread use in older persons with anxiety, benzodiazepines have a limited role in the treatment of GAD in the elderly. If a benzodiazepine is initiated, pharmacokinetic considerations favour the use of either lorazepam or oxazepam. Buspirone also has a more limited role than antidepressants in the treatment of late-life GAD.
    Drugs & Aging 02/2005; 22(2):101-14. · 2.67 Impact Factor
  • Article: Anxiety and its disorders in late life: moving the field forward.
    Alastair J Flint
    American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 02/2005; 13(1):3-6. · 3.64 Impact Factor
  • Article: Affective correlates of fear of falling in elderly persons.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fear of falling is common in older people, occurring on average in 50% of those who have fallen in the previous year. Little is known about the psychological correlates of fear of falling. The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinically significant depression and anxiety were independently associated with fear of falling. This was a cross-sectional study of 105 persons age > or =60 years, admitted to medical or orthopedic wards, who had fallen at least once in the previous 12 months. Fear of falling was assessed using two different constructs: 1) intensity of fear; and 2) self-efficacy. Depressive and anxiety disorders were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Depression and anxiety severity were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Demographic, physical, functional, and social variables previously found to be associated with fear of falling were also measured. Logistic-regression and multiple-regression analyses were used to examine the independent association of affective variables with fear of falling. Depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, depression severity, and anxiety severity had significant independent associations with both constructs of fear of falling. Of all the variables that were measured, depressive disorders and depression severity had the strongest associations with fear of falling. Affective variables had a stronger association with fear of falling than non-affective variables in a hospital-based group of subjects. Further research is needed to determine whether similar findings occur in a community-based sample of older people.
    American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 02/2005; 13(1):7-14. · 3.64 Impact Factor
  • Article: Diagnosis and management of panic disorder in older patients.
    Alastair J Flint, Nadine Gagnon
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Panic disorder occurs less frequently in the elderly than in younger adults and rarely starts for the first time in old age. Panic attacks that begin in late life should prompt the clinician to conduct a careful search for a depressive disorder, physical illness or drugs that could be contributing to their presence. When panic attacks do occur in the elderly, the symptoms are qualitatively similar to those experienced by younger people. The elderly, however, may have fewer and less severe symptoms and exhibit less avoidant behaviour. As panic disorder is typically a chronic or recurrent condition, its management requires a long-term approach. With the exception of one descriptive pilot study, there have been no randomised controlled trials of the treatment of panic disorder in later life. Therefore, recommendations regarding the management of this disorder in the elderly must be extrapolated from research pertaining to younger patients. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, benzodiazepines and cognitive behavioural therapy are efficacious treatments for panic disorder. There are no consistent differences in efficacy between classes of medications or between pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy. Furthermore, there are no reliable predictors of response to one type of treatment compared with another. Treatment selection, therefore, depends on an individual assessment of the risks and benefits of each type of treatment (taking into account comorbid psychiatric and physical conditions), patient preference, cost and the availability of therapists skilled in cognitive behavioural techniques. As a general rule, antidepressant medication is preferable to a benzodiazepine as a first-line treatment for panic disorder in the elderly, especially given the high level of comorbidity between panic disorder and depressive disorders. Of the antidepressants, an SSRI is recommended as the initial choice of treatment in older patients. Anxious patients frequently misattribute somatic symptoms of anxiety to adverse effects of medication. Adherence with treatment, therefore, can be enhanced by starting antidepressant medication at a low dosage so as to avoid initial exacerbation of anxiety (but then gradually increasing the dosage to the therapeutic range), frequent follow-up during the first few weeks of treatment, discussion about potential adverse effects and addressing any other concerns the patient may have about taking medication. Given the delayed onset of action of antidepressant medication, the short-term use of adjunctive lorazepam in the first few weeks of treatment may be helpful in selected patients.
    Drugs & Aging 02/2003; 20(12):881-91. · 2.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Treatment-resistant depression in late life.
    Alastair J Flint
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment resistance is reported in up to 40% of older patients with major depression. Before labeling an episode of depression as treatment resistant, it is important to ensure that the diagnosis is correct and that the patient has received and adhered to an adequate dose of treatment for an appropriate length of time. It is also important to assess the patient for comorbid physical and psychiatric conditions that can contribute to treatment resistance. In patients who do not experience remission of symptoms with an adequate trial of medication, the following options can be considered: augmenting the antidepressant with a drug that is not primarily an antidepressant, adding a second antidepressant to the first, switching to a different antidepressant medication, or switching to electroconvulsive therapy. This paper reviews the concept of treatment-resistant depression and discusses its assessment and management in the elderly. The author concludes that when a systematic stepped-care approach to treatment is followed, most older patients with major depression will experience remission of symptoms.
    CNS spectrums 11/2002; 7(10):733-8. · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Effective use of electroconvulsive therapy in late-life depression.
    Alastair J Flint, Nadine Gagnon
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review literature pertaining to the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in treating late-life depression. We undertook a literature review with an emphasis on research studies published in the last 10 years. There is a positive association between advancing age and ECT efficacy. Age per se does not necessarily increase the risk of cognitive side effects from ECT, but this risk is increased by age-associated neurological conditions such as Alzheimer's dementia and cerebrovascular disease. With appropriate evaluation and monitoring, ECT can be used safely in patients of very advanced age and in those with serious medical conditions. Several technical factors, including dose of electricity relative to a patient's seizure threshold, position of electrodes, frequency of administration, and total number of treatments, have an impact on the efficacy and cognitive side effects of ECT and need to be taken into account when administering ECT. Naturalistic studies have found that 50% of more of patients have a relapse of depression within 6 to 12 months of discontinuing acute ECT. In recent years, there has been substantial progress in our understanding of the effect of technical factors on the efficacy and cognitive side effects of ECT. When administered in an optimal manner, ECT is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment in older patients. Relapse of depression after response to ECT remains a significant problem, and there is a need for further research into the prediction and prevention of post-ECT relapse.
    Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie 11/2002; 47(8):734-41. · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • Article: Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in older patients with major depression.
    Alastair J Flint, Sandra L Rifat
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Symptomatic anxiety has prognostic significance in major depression. In theory, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) should be a useful instrument for measuring the severity of symptomatic anxiety in late-life depression. However, the dimensional structure of the HADS has not been evaluated in elderly depressed patients; it is not known whether the scale actually functions as a bidimensional measure of anxiety and depression in this population. The purpose of this exploratory study, therefore, was to examine the factor structure of the HADS in older patients with major depression. The HADS was completed by 213 patients, aged 60 years or older, with DSM-III-R unipolar major depression. Principal components analysis was performed on the full 14-item HADS and on each of its subscales. Two distinct factors, which corresponded to the instrument's depression and anxiety subscales, emerged. The two-factor structure proved reasonably stable when the study group was randomly divided into two halves. Analysis of the subscales resulted in a single factor for each. The subscales had high internal reliability. These findings confirm that the HADS functions as a bidimensional measure of depression and anxiety in older patients with major depression. The results suggest that the HADS is a valid instrument for measuring severity of anxiety, independent of other depressive symptoms, in this population.
    International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 03/2002; 17(2):117-23. · 2.42 Impact Factor