Publications (7)10.72 Total impact
-
Article: New subclavian artery angioplasty technique for treating subclavian coronary steal syndrome.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Left subclavian artery stenting is usually performed through the standard femoral route using a guiding catheter technique. This technique has obvious drawbacks in the case of coronary subclavian steal due to the poor opacification of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) ostium, and difficult access to the LIMA in the case of plaque shifting, especially when the vertebral artery and the LIMA ostia are very close to the left subclavian artery stenosis. We have developed an "ad hoc" technique to minimize catheter manipulation and contrast injection, and to optimize LIMA and vertebral artery visibility during stent implantation, which includes access through the brachial artery and a long sheath guiding catheter. This technique should be preferred to the standard femoral route because of its intrinsic advantages.The Annals of thoracic surgery 09/2007; 84(2):688-9. · 3.74 Impact Factor -
Article: Impact of intracardiac echocardiography on radiation exposure during adult congenital heart disease catheter-based interventions.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a widespread approach in many cardiovascular procedures in which it has the potential to reduce the fluoroscopy time and patients radiation exposure. We sought to assess the patient radiation exposure during transcatheter closure of interatrial communications with and without ICE-guidance. In a prospective consecutive series of 25 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter closure of interatrial communications between May and October 2005 with (15 patients) and without (10 patients) ICE-guidance in a single secondary care referral centre, we measured the dose-area product (DAP), the fluoroscopy dose-area product (FDAP), the total dose-area product (TDAP), and the mean procedural time. In patients underwent ICE-guided transcatheter closure procedure the mean fluoroscopy time, the mean DAP, mean FDAP, and mean TDAP resulted significantly lower than in control patients: 2.0 +/- 0.21 (range 1.6-2.2) versus 5.05 +/- 0.54 (range 4.2-5.8) minutes (P < 0.001) , 13.72 +/- 9.03 (range 11.36-14.63) versus 21.95 +/- 6.93 (range 20.90-23.93) Gycm2 (P < 0.001), 8.25 +/- 1.22 (range 6.60-9.50) versus 20.15 +/- 8.83 (range 18.90-20.93) Gycm2 (P < 0.001), and 29.33 +/- 1.51(range 27.16-31.00) versus 32.61 +/- 2.53 (range 29.20-35.55) Gycm2 (P < 0.01). On the contrary, the mean procedural time, was significantly higher in ICE-guided transcatheter closure patients: 30.2 +/- 2.45 (range 23-40) versus 24.5 +/- 2.45 (range 24-31) minutes (P = 0.03). The radiation exposure during ICE-guided transcatheter closure of interatrial communications in this group of patients was quite lower than that reported in literature for such procedures and compared favourably with radiation exposure of patients in whom the intervention was performed without ICE guidance.The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 05/2007; 23(2):139-42. · 2.29 Impact Factor -
Article: Concomitant peripheral vascular and coronary artery disease: a new dimension for the global endovascular specialist?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Early and accurate diagnosis of peripheral atherosclerosis is of paramount importance for global ma agement of patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to evaluate retrospectively the prevalence and clinical relevance of significant abdominal vessel stenosis or aneurysm (AVA) in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography at two public institutions over a 12-month period were evaluated. Angiographic results of patients who underwent diagnostic abdominal aorta angiography, based on clinical criteria, to evaluate abdominal vessels the same time as coronary angiography were analyzed. During the study period, AVA was reported in 180 (35.7%) of 504 consecutive patients (335 men, mean age 68 +/- 13.8 years): renal artery stenosis was found in 13.1% of cases (66 patients), aortoiliac artery disease in 13.7% (69 patients and aortic aneurysmal disease in 8.9% (45 patients). Logistic regression analyses revealed > or = 3-vessel CAD (odds ratio [OR] 9.917, p = 0.002), age >65 years (OR 3.817, p = 0.036), > or =3 risk factors (OR 2.8, p = 0.048) as independent predictors of AVA. Multiple vascular atherosclerotic distributions are frequent in elderly patients who have multivessel CAD and a high-risk profile, suggesting the usefulness of a more global and comprehensive cardiovascular approach.Clinical Cardiology 06/2005; 28(5):231-5. · 2.15 Impact Factor -
Article: An improved technique for gaining radial artery access in endovascular interventions.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We present a simple technique to avoid time loss and potential dangerous maneuvers for catheterization of the radial artery in endovascular interventions. If any difficulties are encountered when advancing the guide wire after the arterial puncture using standard transradial kits, we found it useful to routinely use a 60-mm polyethylene radial pressure line catheter like the Leader Cath (Vygon, Ecquen, France), which is more flexible and less traumatic than short catheters and are usually available in the standard hydrophilic transradial kit. With the 20-gauge needle within the arterial lumen, it is sufficient to advance the guide wire 3 or 4 cm, followed by the insertion of the radial pressure line catheter for administering a vasodilator cocktail. The contrast injection through the catheter is safer than through the needle, and visualization of the underling problems may avoid any time loss and complications. The standard sheath insertion is facilitated by the pressure line catheter that acts as a dilator. This technique, especially when performing coronary or peripheral interventions in which large introducers are needed, may avoid potentially dangerous vascular complications and improve the success rate.Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 7(1):46-7. -
Article: Evidence against the widespread use of angiography of noncoronary arteries during coronary artery angiography and cardiac catheterization.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although the most widely used screening techniques for extracardiac atherosclerotic distributions are noninvasive, in patients undergoing coronary arteriography, the question as to whether angiography of extracardiac arteries at the time of cardiac catheterization is really effective or if it should be considered malpractice is still open. We sought to determine the safety and real usefulness of angiography of extracardiac arteries performed by trained invasive cardiologists during cardiac catheterization. Medical records of all patients undergoing combined coronary and noncoronary angiography between May 1998 and December 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Moderate to severe arterial stenosis (>50% stenosis), vessel occlusion, aneurysmal, or severe ectasia were noted as significant angiographic findings. Two hundred and seventy patients (165 males, mean age = 67.7+/-9.2 years, mean serum creatinine = 1.1+/-0.8 mg/dl) underwent combined cardiac catheterization and angiography of extracardiac arteries following specific indications. Significant findings were reported in 66 (24.4%) patients. Logistic regression analyses revealed three-vessel coronary artery disease [CAD; odds ratio (OR)=9.917; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.2 to 43.8; P = .002) and hypercholesterolemia (OR = 2.851; 95% CI=1.03 to 7.9; P = .044) to be independent predictors of extracardiac atherosclerotic involvement. Complications rate was negligible. The detection of significant angiographic findings led to endovascular treatment in 37.8% and surgical vascular repair in 33.3% of cases. Angiography of extracardiac arteries at the time of coronary angiography appears justified only in patients with specific indications, multivessel CAD, and hypercholesterolemia.Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 6(2):48-51. -
Article: An uncommon coronary artery fistula.
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 6(3):136-7. -
Article: Angiographic characteristics of renal arterial disease over the spectrum of coronary artery disease.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The angiographic characteristics of renal artery stenoses (RAS) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have not been yet fully investigated. We sought to evaluate the angiographic characteristics of RAS in patients with CAD. The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography in a single public institution over a 12-month period were evaluated. The patients who underwent coincident diagnostic renal angiography to evaluate renal vessels on the basis of clinical criteria and who had at least one-vessel CAD were analyzed. Moderate (50-70%) to severe (70-100%) arterial stenoses were noted as significant angiographic findings. The types of stenosis (ostial, true renal, mixed) and presence and location of calcium were recorded. Angiographically significant RAS were reported in 40 (19.5%) of 205 consecutive patients (mean age 67.1 +/- 12.8 years, mean serum creatinine concentration 2.1 +/- 0.5 mg/dl, mean glomerular filtration rate 52 +/- 13 ml/min) for a total of 55 lesions. The RAS severity was moderate in 30.9% (17/55), severe in 69.1% (38/55), ostial in 27.2% (15/55), true renal in 10.9% (6/55), and mixed in 61.8% (34/55) of the patients. The mean lesion length was 16 +/- 1.8 mm. Patients with > or = 3-vessel CAD had a statistically significantly higher prevalence of mixed calcified RAS (18/24, 75%). Logistic regression analyses revealed > or = 3-vessel CAD (odds ratio 9.917, p = 0.002), age > 65 years (odds ratio 3.817, p = 0.036), and > or = 3 risk factors (odds ratio 2.8, p = 0.048) as independent predictors of RAS. RAS in multivessel CAD patients seems to have a peculiar angiographic pattern, such as a higher prevalence of mixed calcified lesions and poststenotic enlargement, that should be taken in account when dealing with RAS.American Journal of Nephrology 25(2):116-20. · 2.54 Impact Factor
