J C Weeks

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA

Are you J C Weeks?

Claim your profile

Publications (48)779.71 Total impact

  • Article: Direct-to-consumer advertising for bleeding disorders: a content analysis and expert evaluation of advertising claims.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that all direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) contain both an accurate statement of a medication's effects ('truth') and an even-handed discussion of its benefits and risks/adverse effects ('fair balance'). DTCA for medications to treat rare diseases such as bleeding disorders is unlikely to be given high priority for FDA review. We reviewed all DTCA for bleeding disorder products appearing in the patient-directed magazine HemeAware from January 2004 to June 2006. We categorized the information presented in each advertisement as benefit, risk/adverse effect, or neither, and assessed the amount of text and type size devoted to each. We also assessed the readability of each type of text using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES, where a score of >or=65 is considered of average readability), and assessed the accuracy of the advertising claims utilizing a panel of five bleeding disorder experts. A total of 39 unique advertisements for 12 products were found. On average, approximately twice the amount of text was devoted to benefits as compared with risks/adverse effects, and the latter was more difficult to read [FRES of 32.0 for benefits vs. 20.5 for risks/adverse effects, a difference of 11.5 (95% CI: 4.5-18.5)]. Only about two-thirds of the advertising claims were considered by a majority of the experts to be based on at least low-quality evidence. As measured by our methods, print DTCA for bleeding disorders may not reach the FDA's standards of truth and fair balance.
    Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 10/2008; 6(10):1680-4. · 5.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contemporary ethical accounts of the patient-provider relationship emphasise respect for patient autonomy and shared decision making. We sought to examine the relative influence of involvement in decisions, confidence and trust in providers, and treatment with respect and dignity on patients' evaluations of their hospital care. Cross-sectional survey. Fifty one hospitals in Massachusetts. Stratified random sample of adults (N=27 414) discharged from a medical, surgical, or maternity hospitalisation between January and March, 1998. Twelve thousand six hundred and eighty survey recipients responded. Respondent would definitely be willing to recommend the hospital to family and friends. In a logistic regression analysis, treatment with respect and dignity (odds ratio (OR) 3.4, 99% confidence interval (CI) 2.8 to 4.2) and confidence and trust in providers (OR 2.5, CI 2.1 to 3.0) were more strongly associated with willingness to recommend than having enough involvement in decisions (OR 1.4, CI 1.1 to 1.6). Courtesy and availability of staff (OR 2.5, CI 2.1 to 3.1), continuity and transition (OR 1.9, CI 1.5 to 2.2), attention to physical comfort (OR 1.8, CI 1.5 to 2.2), and coordination of care (OR 1.5, CI 1.3 to 1.8) were also significantly associated with willingness to recommend. Confidence and trust in providers and treatment with respect and dignity are more closely associated with patients' overall evaluations of their hospitals than adequate involvement in decisions. These findings challenge a narrow emphasis on patient autonomy and shared decision making, while arguing for increased attention to trust and respect in ethical models of health care.
    Journal of Medical Ethics 05/2003; 29(2):103-8. · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Article: The treating physician as active gatekeeper in the recruitment of research subjects.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Institutional Review Boards vary in regard to the conditions imposed on investigators concerning contacting potential subjects to participate in health-services research studies. The impact of more active involvement of the treating physician was examined in the approval process for recruiting study subjects. In recruiting subjects for a Massachusetts-based, multihospital (n = 17), health-services research study of treatment patterns for early stage breast cancer that required patient interviews, four hospitals stipulated that the treating surgeon provide written permission to the investigators to allow any contact with a potential study subject for the purpose of recruitment (active physician involvement group); the remaining 13 hospitals stipulated that the treating surgeon need only respond to the investigators if contact with a potential subject was forbidden (passive physician involvement group). Of the 1401 potential subjects treated for early stage breast cancer, 697 were in the active physician involvement group and 704 were in the passive physician involvement group. The percentages of patients for whom contact was allowed for recruitment purposes and who enrolled in the study were determined for the active physician involvement group and the passive physician involvement group, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to assess the independent effect of physician involvement on study enrollment. Of the 697 patients in the active physician involvement group, contact was approved by the treating surgeon for 72% (n = 505), compared with 91% (n = 638) of the passive physician involvement group (P <0.001). After adjustment for a variety of patient, physician, and hospital-level variables, patients in the passive physician involvement group were found to be significantly more likely to be enrolled in the study (adjusted OR 2.61; 95% CI, 1.53-4.45). However, among those patients approved for investigator contact, there were no significant differences between patients who were enrolled and patients who were not enrolled in the study with regard to physician involvement in the recruitment process (adjusted OR 1.13; 95% CI, 0.70-1.81). Our findings demonstrate that more stringent IRB requirements on health services researchers to verify permission from the treating physician to access patients for recruitment purposes adversely impact on the enrollment of patients even in noninterventional research studies. Current procedures for involving the treating physician as a gatekeeper in the recruitment of research subjects may limit access to patient participation in research studies from the perspectives of both researchers and potential subjects.
    Medical Care 12/2001; 39(12):1339-44. · 3.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Investigators have to obtain informed consent before enrolling participants in clinical trials. We wanted to measure the quality of understanding among participants in clinical trials of cancer therapies, to identify correlates of increased understanding, and to assess providers' beliefs about clinical research. We also sought evidence of therapeutic misconceptions in participants and providers. We sent a standard questionnaire to 287 adult patients with cancer who had recently enrolled in a clinical trial at one of three affiliated institutions, and surveyed the provider who obtained each patient's consent. 207 of 287 (72%) patients responded. 90% (186) of these respondents were satisfied with the informed consent process and most considered themselves to be well informed. Nevertheless, many did not recognise non-standard treatment (74%), the potential for incremental risk from participation (63%), the unproven nature of the treatment (70%), the uncertainty of benefits to self (29%), or that trials are done mainly to benefit future patients (25%). In multivariate analysis, increased knowledge was associated with college education, speaking only English at home, use of the US National Cancer Institute consent form template, not signing the consent form at initial discussion, presence of a nurse, and careful reading of the consent form. Only 28 of 61 providers (46%) recognised that the main reason for clinical trials is benefit to future patients. Misconceptions about cancer clinical trials are frequent among trial participants, and physician/investigators might share some of these misconceptions. Efforts to educate providers and participants about the underlying goals of clinical trials are needed.
    The Lancet 12/2001; 358(9295):1772-7. · 38.28 Impact Factor
  • Article: Discussion of treatment options for early-stage breast cancer: effect of provider specialty on type of surgery and satisfaction.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the physicians with whom breast cancer patients discuss treatment options and assess whether discussing surgical options with a medical oncologist is associated with type of surgery and satisfaction. Medical record abstraction and survey. Women with early-stage breast cancer numbering 2,426 in two states-Massachusetts, where the rate of breast-conserving surgery is high, and Minnesota, where it is lower. Receipt of breast-conserving surgery and satisfaction. Women in Massachusetts discussed breast cancer treatments with more physicians than women in Minnesota (mean 3.5 vs. 2.8; P <0.001) and more often discussed surgical options with a medical oncologist (52% vs. 28%; P <0.001). Using propensity score analyses, in Massachusetts, discussing surgical options with a medical oncologist was not related to type of surgery (adjusted difference in rate of breast-conserving surgery: 3.9%, 95% CI -3.6% to 11.5%) but was associated with greater satisfaction (adjusted difference: 8.1, 95% CI 2.0% to 14.2%). In Minnesota, discussing surgical options with a medical oncologist was associated with breast-conserving surgery (adjusted difference: 12.6%, 95% CI 5.6% to 19.7%) with no difference in satisfaction (adjusted difference: -1.5%, 95% CI -6.8% to 3.8%). Outcomes associated with discussing surgical treatments with a medical oncologist vary with local care patterns. Where breast-conserving surgery is standard care, seeing a medical oncologist is not related to type of surgery, but is associated with greater satisfaction. Where it is not the standard, seeing a medical oncologist is associated with more breast-conserving surgery and equivalent satisfaction. These findings suggest that collaborative care may benefit women with respect to treatment selection or satisfaction.
    Medical Care 08/2001; 39(7):681-91. · 3.41 Impact Factor
  • Article: Costs and effectiveness of staging and treatment options in early-stage Hodgkin's disease.
    A K Ng, K M Kuntz, P M Mauch, J C Weeks
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using a cost-effectiveness analysis, to weigh the costs and benefits of the different staging and treatment options in early-stage Hodgkin's disease. We constructed a decision-analytic model for a hypothetical cohort of 25-year-old patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease. Markov models were used to simulate the lifetime costs and prognosis of each staging and treatment strategy. Baseline probabilities and cost estimates were derived from published studies and bills of relevant patient cohorts. Among the six management strategies considered, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of laparotomy and tailored treatment compared with mantle and para-aortic-splenic radiation therapy in all clinical stage I-II patients was $24,100/quality-adjusted life year, while that of the strategy of combined modality therapy in all clinical stage I-II patients compared with laparotomy was $61,700/quality-adjusted life year. All the remaining strategies were dominated by one of these three strategies. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness ratios were driven predominantly by the effectiveness rather than the cost of each strategy. In particular, the analysis was heavily influenced by the utility of the post-laparotomy health state. In considering the various alternative management strategies in early-stage Hodgkin's disease, even very small gains in effectiveness were enough to justify the additional costs of more expensive treatment options.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 08/2001; 50(4):979-89. · 4.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Discrepancies between patient and physician estimates for the success of stem cell transplantation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stem cell transplantation is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The extent to which patients and their physicians correctly estimate these risks is unknown. To measure the expectations of patients and physicians prior to stem cell transplantation and correlate them with actual outcomes after transplantation. Prospective cohort study with baseline questionnaire administered July 1996 through November 1999 and follow-up to May 2000. Tertiary care transplant center in the United States. Of 458 surveys mailed, evaluable returned surveys were included for 313 autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation patients and their physicians. Patient and physician expectations prior to transplantation (measured on 6-point Likert scales) of treatment-related mortality, cure with transplantation, and cure without transplantation; actual treatment-related mortality and disease-free survival among patients with at least 1 year of follow-up after transplantation (n = 263). Both patients and physicians were fairly accurate in estimating treatment-related mortality when actual mortality was less than 30%. However, in situations in which mortality was higher than 30%, such as with allogeneic transplantation for intermediate or advanced disease, physician expectations were lower, while patients remained optimistic. Similarly, physicians provided lower estimates of disease-free survival in cases of intermediate or advanced disease while patient expectations remained high and constant regardless of disease stage. Patients and their physicians have the most concordant and accurate expectations when the outcome of stem cell transplantation is likely to be favorable. However, patients with more advanced disease fail to recognize the higher risks associated with their situations.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 03/2001; 285(8):1034-8. · 30.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: Effectiveness of chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer in the elderly: instrumental variable and propensity analysis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy given to elderly patients in routine practice for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the efficacy observed in randomized trials. We used instrumental variable analysis (IVA) and propensity scores (PS) to simulate the conditions of a randomized trial in a retrospective cohort of patients over age 65 from the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry. Geographic variation in chemotherapy use served as the instrument for the IVA analysis, and propensity scores were calculated with a logistic model based on patient disease and sociodemographic characteristics. Among 6,232 elderly patients, the instrumental variable estimate indicated an increase in median survival of 33 days and an improvement in 1-year survival of 9% attributable to chemotherapy. In a Cox regression model, chemotherapy administration was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.85). When survival was analyzed separately within propensity score quintiles, the hazard ratios were all similar, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85. These results are comparable with those of a large meta-analysis, which found a hazard ratio of 0.87 in the subgroup of patients over age 65. Chemotherapy for stage IV NSCLC seems to have effectiveness for elderly patients and those with comorbid conditions that is similar to the efficacy seen in randomized trials containing mostly younger, highly selected patients. All suitable patients should be given the opportunity to consider palliative chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 03/2001; 19(4):1064-70. · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Recovery after stem-cell transplantation for hematologic diseases.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the number of autologous and allogeneic stem-cell transplantations (SCT) is increasing, relatively little information about recovery after transplantation is available. Quantitative information appropriate for patient counseling is difficult to discern from the literature. We sought to suggest reasonable expectations for recovery and symptoms after SCT for hematologic malignancies and other disorders using the following measures: (1) objective measures of health status, such as frequency of clinic visits, need for rehospitalization, medication usage, work status, and overall and event-free survival; (2) qualitative assessment of quality of life, such as returning to a normal life, resumption of normal activities, satisfaction with appearance, and whether recovery has occurred; and (3) quantification of specific bothersome symptoms. Autologous and allogeneic SCT recipients at a tertiary-care transplant center participated in the prospective, longitudinal questionnaire study. Three hundred twenty patients were studied. Questionnaire response rates at 6, 12, and 24 months range from 85% to 88% among survivors. Although autologous patients had better event-free and overall survival, fewer symptoms, and more complete recovery at 6 months, these advantages had largely equalized by 12 months. Specific bothersome symptoms were reported by less than 24% of patients after transplantation, except for fatigue and financial and sexual difficulties, which were more prevalent. These findings may help counsel patients considering transplantation and educate them about reasonable expectations for recovery. Overall, the low level of bothersome symptoms and continued recovery through the first year after transplantation are encouraging.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 02/2001; 19(1):242-52. · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The informed consent of participants is ethically and legally required for most research involving human subjects. However, standardized methods for assessing the adequacy of informed consent to research are lacking. We designed a brief questionnaire, the Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC), to measure subjects' actual (objective) and perceived (subjective) understanding of cancer clinical trials. The QuIC incorporates the basic elements of informed consent specified in federal regulations, assesses the therapeutic misconception (the belief that all aspects of a clinical trial are designed to directly benefit the subject), and employs the language and structure of the new National Cancer Institute template for informed consent documents. We modified the QuIC after receiving feedback from pilot tests with cancer research subjects, as well as validation from two independent expert panels. We then sent the QuIC to 287 adult cancer patients enrolled on phase I, II, or III clinical trials. Two hundred seven subjects (72%) completed the QuIC. To assess test-retest reliability, a random sample of 32 respondents was selected, of whom 17 (53%) completed the questionnaire a second time. The test-retest reliability was good with intraclass correlation coefficients of.66 for tests of objective understanding and.77 for tests of subjective understanding. The current version of the QuIC, which consists of 20 questions for objective understanding and 14 questions for subjective understanding, was tested for time and ease of administration in a sample of nine adult cancer patients. The QuIC required an average of 7.2 minutes to complete. The QuIC is a brief, reliable, and valid questionnaire that holds promise as a standardized way to assess the outcome of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.
    JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 02/2001; 93(2):139-47. · 13.76 Impact Factor
  • Article: Disclosure of familial genetic information: perceptions of the duty to inform.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The familial implications of genetic information can lead to a conflict between a physician's duties to maintain patient confidentiality and to inform at-risk relatives about susceptibility to genetic diseases. As genes are discovered that can identify patients at risk of adverse outcomes, this conflict has become the subject of discussion and debate. We performed a one-time telephone survey of a population-based sample of 200 Jewish women to assess knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing. Attitudes toward sharing genetic test results with family members were evaluated using three hypothetical scenarios that described an easily preventable disease, a disease (breast cancer) in which the only option for prevention was prophylactic mastectomies, and a nonpreventable disease. Nearly all respondents believed that a patient should inform at-risk family members when the disease was preventable (100% and 97% in the relevant scenarios), compared with only 85% who felt a duty to inform at-risk family members about a nonpreventable disease (P <0.001). The proportions of respondents who believed that physicians should seek out and inform at-risk family members against a patient's wishes was much lower: only 18% of respondents to the easily preventable disease scenario, 22% of respondents to the breast cancer scenario, and 16% of respondents to the nonpreventable disease scenario. Most women surveyed believed that genetic information should be shared within families, unless it violated a patient's wishes. These sorts of opinions should be considered in the debate over the confidentiality of genetic information.
    The American Journal of Medicine 01/2001; 109(9):705-11. · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • Article: Understanding of prognosis among parents of children who died of cancer: impact on treatment goals and integration of palliative care.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Parents' understanding of prognosis or decision making about palliative care for children who die of cancer is largely unknown. However, a more accurate understanding of prognosis could alter treatment goals and expectations and lead to more effective care. To evaluate parental understanding of prognosis in children who die of cancer and to assess the association of this factor with treatment goals and the palliative care received by children. Survey, conducted between September 1997 and August 1998, of 103 parents of children who received treatment at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass, and who died of cancer between 1990 and 1997 (72% of those eligible and those located) and 42 pediatric oncologists. Timing of parental understanding that the child had no realistic chance for cure compared with the timing of physician understanding of this prognosis, as documented in the medical record. Parents first recognized that the child had no realistic chance for cure a mean (SD) of 106 (150) days before the child's death, while physician recognition occurred earlier at 206 (330) days before death. Among children who died of progressive disease, the group characterized by earlier recognition of this prognosis by both parents and physicians had earlier discussions of hospice care (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.06; P =.01), better parental ratings of the quality of home care (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.15-9.54; P =.03), earlier institution of a do-not-resuscitate order (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06; P =.02), less use of cancer-directed therapy during the last month of life (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.05-7.50; P =.04), and higher likelihood that the goal of cancer-directed therapy identified by both physician and parent was to lessen suffering (OR, 5.17; 95% CI, 1.86-14.4; P =.002 for physician and OR, 6.56; 95% CI, 1.54-27.86; P =.01 for parents). Considerable delay exists in parental recognition that children have no realistic chance for cure, but earlier recognition of this prognosis by both physicians and parents is associated with a stronger emphasis on treatment directed at lessening suffering and greater integration of palliative care. JAMA. 2000;284:2469-2475.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 12/2000; 284(19):2469-75. · 30.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: Patient preferences for axillary dissection in the management of early-stage breast cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent data on the value of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer and promising early data on less invasive strategies for managing the axilla have raised questions about the appropriate role of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the management of early-stage breast cancer. We sought to evaluate how women weigh potential benefits of ALND-prognostic information, enhanced local control, and tailored therapy-against the risks of long-term morbidity that are associated with the procedure. We used hypothetical scenarios to survey 82 randomly selected women with invasive breast cancer who had been treated with ALND and 62 women at risk for invasive breast cancer by virtue of a history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who had not undergone ALND. Women in both the invasive cancer and the DCIS groups required substantial improvements in local control of the cancer (5% and 15%, respectively) and overall survival (3% and 10%, respectively) before they would opt for this procedure. Women with invasive cancer would choose ALND if it had only a 1% chance of altering treatment recommendations, whereas DCIS subjects required a 25% chance. Sixty-eight percent and 29% of women in the invasive cancer and DCIS groups, respectively, would accepted a 40% risk of arm dysfunction to gain prognostic information that would not change treatment. For most subjects treated previously for invasive breast cancer and almost half those at risk of the disease, the potential benefits of ALND, particularly the value of prognostic information, were sufficient to outweigh the risks of morbidity. However, women varied considerably in their preferences, highlighting the need to tailor decisions regarding management of the axilla to individual patients' values.
    JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 11/2000; 92(20):1681-7. · 13.76 Impact Factor
  • Article: Patterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older women: patient preference and clinical and physical influences.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Older women have high rates of breast carcinoma, and there are substantial variations in the patterns of care for this population group. The authors studied 718 breast carcinoma patients age 67 years and older who were diagnosed with localized disease between 1995 and 1997 from 29 hospitals in 5 regions. Data were collected from patients, charts, and surgeons. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate determinants of treatment. Women who were concerned about body image were 1.8 times more likely (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.1-2.8) to receive breast conservation surgery and radiotherapy than women without this preference, controlling for other factors. In contrast, women who preferred receiving no therapy beyond surgery were 3.9 times more likely (95% CI, 2.9-6.1) to undergo mastectomy than other women, after considering other factors. Radiotherapy was omitted after breast conservation 3.4 times more often (95% CI, 2.0-5.6) among women age 80 years and older than among women ages 67-79 years, controlling for covariates. Black women tended to have radiotherapy omitted after breast conservation surgery 2.0 times more often (95% CI, 0.9-4.4) than white women (P = 0.09). Women age 80 years and older also were 70% less likely (odds ratio = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8) to receive chemotherapy than women ages 67-79 years, controlling for health, functional status, and other covariates. After considering other factors, patient preferences and age were found to be associated with breast carcinoma treatment patterns in older women. Further research and training are needed to provide care for the growing population of older women that is both clinically appropriate and consonant with a woman's preferences.
    Cancer 09/2000; 89(3):561-73. · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Binary data with two, non-nested sources of clustering: an analysis of physician recommendations for early prostate cancer treatment.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A prospective cohort study of men with newly diagnosed early prostate cancer was undertaken Talcott et al. (1998) in order to evaluate both the patient-level and the physician-level determinants of physician recommendations for radical prostatectomy (surgery) versus radiation therapy. Each patient sought recommendations from as many as six physicians, and each physician provided recommendations for as many as 113 patients. Thus, the recommendations are clustered within physician and within patient. While methods have been developed for binary data with multiple-nested sources of clustering, they have not been fully explored for binary data with non-nested sources of clustering, such as the treatment recommendations. Here we propose reclustering the data to form binary data with one source of clustering. Because the reclustered data result in one very large cluster and several clusters of size one and two, marginal logistic regression models for the probability of a recommendation of surgery fit using a generalized estimating equation approach would produce unreliable estimates of uncertainty for the parameters. Thus, in addition to the mean model, we attempt to model the associations in as much detail as possible. We compare this model to a mixed-effects model that implicitly adjusts for both sources of clustering and to models based on the assumption of conditional independence with regard to one source of clustering.
    Biostatistics 07/2000; 1(2):219-30. · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • Article: Who gets chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the prevalence and factors associated with chemotherapy use in elderly patients presenting with advanced lung cancer. A retrospective cohort study using administrative data. We analyzed the medical bills for the 6,308 Medicare patients > 65 years old with diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the 11 SEER (survival, epidemiology, and end results) regions between 1991 and 1993. The main outcome measure, chemotherapy administration, was identified by the relevant medical billing codes. Patient sociodemographic and disease characteristics were obtained from the SEER database and census data. Almost 22% of patients received chemotherapy at some time for their metastatic NSCLC. As expected, younger patients and those with fewer comorbid conditions were more likely to receive chemotherapy. However, several nonmedical factors, such as nonblack race, higher socioeconomic status, treatment in a teaching hospital, and living in the Seattle/Puget Sound or Los Angeles SEER regions, also significantly increased a patient's likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. Compared to previous reports, the prevalence of chemotherapy use for advanced NSCLC appears to be increasing. However, despite uniform health insurance coverage, there is wide variation in the utilization of palliative chemotherapy among Medicare patients, and nonmedical factors are strong predictors of whether a patient receives chemotherapy. While it is impossible to know the appropriate rate of usage, nonmedical factors should only influence a patient's likelihood of receiving treatment if they reflect patient treatment preference. Research to further clarify the costs, benefits, and patient preferences for chemotherapy in this patient population is warranted in order to minimize the effect of nonmedical biases on management decisions.
    Chest 06/2000; 117(5):1239-46. · 5.25 Impact Factor
  • Article: Improving discussion of surgical treatment options for patients with breast cancer: local medical opinion leaders versus audit and performance feedback.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We studied whether a hospital intervention utilizing medical opinion leaders and performance feedback reduced the proportion of women who reported that surgeons did not discuss options prior to surgery for early stage breast cancer. Opinion leaders provided clinical education to their peers using a variety of strategies and were selected for their ability to influence their peers. Performance feedback involved distributing performance reports that contained data on the outcomes of interest as well as on other treatment patterns. Twenty-eight hospitals in Minnesota were randomized to the intervention or to a control group that received performance feedback only. The proportion of patients at intervention hospitals who said that their surgeon did not discuss options decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 33% to 17%, but a similar decrease was observed among control hospitals. Using medical opinion leaders to intervene in hospitals appeared as effective as performance feedback.
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 05/2000; 61(2):171-5. · 4.43 Impact Factor
  • Article: Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer is the second leading cause of death in children, after accidents. Little is known, however, about the symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer. In 1997 and 1998, we interviewed the parents of children who had died of cancer between 1990 and 1997 and who were cared for at Children's Hospital, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, or both. Additional data were obtained by reviewing medical records. Of 165 eligible parents, we interviewed 103 (62 percent), 98 by telephone and 5 in person. The interviews were conducted a mean (+/-SD) of 3.1+/-1.6 years after the death of the child. Almost 80 percent died of progressive disease, and the rest died of treatment-related complications. Forty-nine percent of the children died in the hospital; nearly half of these deaths occurred in the intensive care unit. According to the parents, 89 percent of the children suffered "a lot" or "a great deal" from at least one symptom in their last month of life, most commonly pain, fatigue, or dyspnea. Of the children who were treated for specific symptoms, treatment was successful in 27 percent of those with pain and 16 percent of those with dyspnea. On the basis of a review of the medical records, parents were significantly more likely than physicians to report that their child had fatigue, poor appetite, constipation, and diarrhea. Suffering from pain was more likely in children whose parents reported that the physician was not actively involved in providing end-of-life care (odds ratio, 2.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 6.7). Children who die of cancer receive aggressive treatment at the end of life. Many have substantial suffering in the last month of life, and attempts to control their symptoms are often unsuccessful. Greater attention must be paid to palliative care for children who are dying of cancer.
    New England Journal of Medicine 03/2000; 342(5):326-33. · 53.30 Impact Factor
  • Article: Outcomes research in oncology: history, conceptual framework, and trends in the literature.
    S J Lee, C C Earle, J C Weeks
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: "Outcomes research" is a commonly used term, but what does it really mean? In this review article, we 1) briefly review the historic background of outcomes research, paying particular attention to the social and political movements that helped shape the field; 2) present a conceptual framework to help classify the major areas of research and provide a working definition of outcomes research; and 3) review the oncology literature in the English language from 1966 through 1998 to examine temporal trends and characterize the body of work being presented to the practicing oncology community. We conclude that outcomes research is a broad concept, which, in its current usage, describes an array of distinct types of research. However, common themes are apparent when outcomes research is viewed in the context of its historic origins and is contrasted with other established disciplines, especially clinical trials. Our literature review shows that outcomes studies are increasing in absolute numbers, in relative proportion of the oncology literature, and in quality. We suggest that as different branches of investigation develop their own literature and methodology-in effect, outgrowing the generic label of outcomes research-they become identified by separate, more precise terms.
    JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 03/2000; 92(3):195-204. · 13.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Life expectancy gains from cancer prevention strategies for women with breast cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Women with BRCA1- or BRCA2-associated breast cancer are at increased risk for contralateral breast cancer and ovarian cancer and therefore may consider secondary cancer prevention strategies, such as prophylactic surgery and tamoxifen therapy. It is not proven to what extent these strategies reduce risk of second cancers in such patients. To examine the effect of tamoxifen therapy, bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy (PO), prophylactic contralateral mastectomy (PCM), and combinations of these strategies on life expectancy for women with unilateral breast cancer and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. Decision analysis using a Markov model. Probabilities for developing contralateral breast cancer and ovarian cancer, dying from these cancers, dying from primary breast cancer, and the reduction in cancer incidence and mortality due to prophylactic surgeries and/or tamoxifen were estimated from published studies. Hypothetical breast cancer patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations facing decisions about secondary cancer prevention strategies. Seven strategies, including 5 years of tamoxifen use, PO, PCM, and combinations of these strategies, compared with careful surveillance. Total and incremental life expectancy (LE) with each intervention strategy. Depending on the assumed penetrance of the BRCA mutation, compared with surveillance alone, 30-year-old early-stage breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations gain in LE 0.4 to 1.3 years from tamoxifen therapy, 0.2 to 1.8 years from PO, and 0.6 to 2.1 years from PCM. The magnitude of these gains is least for women with low-penetrance mutations (assumed contralateral breast cancer risk of 24% and ovarian cancer risk of 6%) and greatest for those with high-penetrance mutations (assumed contralateral breast cancer risk of 65% and ovarian cancer risk of 40%.) Older age and poorer prognosis from primary breast cancer further attenuate these gains. Interventions to prevent second cancers, particularly PCM, may offer substantial LE gain for young women with BRCA-associated early-stage breast cancer. Estimates of LE gain may help women and their physicians consider the uncertainties, risks, and advantages of these interventions and lead to more informed choices about cancer prevention strategies.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 03/2000; 283(5):617-24. · 30.03 Impact Factor

Institutions

  • 1991–2008
    • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      • • Center for Outcomes and Policy Research
      • • Department of Pediatric Oncology
      Boston, MA, USA
  • 2001
    • Primary Health Care Institute
      Iringa, Iringa Region, Tanzania
    • Boston Children's Hospital
      • Department of Pediatrics
      Boston, MA, USA
  • 1999–2000
    • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • • Department of Radiation Oncology
      • • Department of Medicine
      Boston, MA, USA
  • 1998–2000
    • University of Michigan
      • Department of Radiation Oncology
      Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Harvard University
      • Department of Biostatistics
      Cambridge, MA, USA
    • Harvard Medical School
      • Department of Health Care Policy
      Boston, MA, USA